Gene silencing via protein-mediated subcellular localization of DNA

Plasmid Partition Mechanisms

The stable maintenance of low-copy-number plasmids in bacteria is actively driven by partition mechanisms that are responsible for the positioning of plasmids inside the cell. Partition systems are ubiquitous in the microbial world and are encoded by many bacterial chromosomes as well as plasmids. These systems, although different in sequence and mechanism, typically consist of two proteins and a DNA partition site, or prokaryotic centromere, on the plasmid or chromosome. One protein binds site-specifically to the centromere to form a partition complex, and the other protein uses the energy of nucleotide binding and hydrolysis to transport the plasmid, via interactions with this partition complex inside the cell. For plasmids, this minimal cassette is sufficient to direct proper segregation in bacterial cells. There has been significant progress in the last several years in our understanding of partition mechanisms. Two general areas that have developed are (i) the structural biology of partition proteins and their interactions with DNA and (ii) the action and dynamics of the partition ATPases that drive the process. In addition, systems that use tubulin-like GTPases to partition plasmids have recently been identified. In this chapter, we concentrate on these recent developments and the molecular details of plasmid partition mechanisms.

The Nucleoid: an Overview

This review provides a brief review of the current understanding of the structure-function relationship of the Escherichia coli nucleoid developed after the overview by Pettijohn focusing on the physical properties of nucleoids. Isolation of nucleoids requires suppression of DNA expansion by various procedures. The ability to control the expansion of nucleoids in vitro has led to purification of nucleoids for chemical and physical analyses and for high-resolution imaging. Isolated E. coli genomes display a number of individually intertwined supercoiled loops emanating from a central core. Metabolic processes of the DNA double helix lead to three types of topological constraints that all cells must resolve to survive: linking number, catenates, and knots. The major species of nucleoid core protein share functional properties with eukaryotic histones forming chromatin; even the structures are different from histones. Eukaryotic histones play dynamic roles in the remodeling of eukaryotic chromatin, thereby controlling the access of RNA polymerase and transcription factors to promoters. The E. coli genome is tightly packed into the nucleoid, but, at each cell division, the genome must be faithfully replicated, divided, and segregated. Nucleoid activities such as transcription, replication, recombination, and repair are all affected by the structural properties and the special conformations of nucleoid. While it is apparent that much has been learned about the nucleoid, it is also evident that the fundamental interactions organizing the structure of DNA in the nucleoid still need to be clearly defined.

Insights into ParB spreading from the complex structure of Spo0J and parS

Spo0J (stage 0 sporulation protein J, a member of the ParB superfamily) is an essential component of the ParABS (partition system of ParA, ParB, and parS)-related bacterial chromosome segregation system. ParB (partition protein B) and its regulatory protein, ParA, act cooperatively through parS (partition S) DNA to facilitate chromosome segregation. ParB binds to chromosomal DNA at specific parS sites as well as the neighboring nonspecific DNA sites. Various ParB molecules can associate together and spread along the chromosomal DNA. ParB oligomer and parS DNA interact together to form a high-order nucleoprotein that is required for the loading of the structural maintenance of chromosomes proteins onto the chromosome for chromosomal DNA condensation. In this report, we characterized the binding of parS and Spo0J from Helicobacter pylori (HpSpo0J) and solved the crystal structure of the C-terminal domain truncated protein (Ct-HpSpo0J)-parS complex. Ct-HpSpo0J folds into an elongated structure that includes a flexible N-terminal domain for protein-protein interaction and a conserved DNA-binding domain for parS binding. Two Ct-HpSpo0J molecules bind with one parS. Ct-HpSpo0J interacts vertically and horizontally with its neighbors through the N-terminal domain to form an oligomer. These adjacent and transverse interactions are accomplished via a highly conserved arginine patch: RRLR. These interactions might be needed for molecular assembly of a high-order nucleoprotein complex and for ParB spreading. A structural model for ParB spreading and chromosomal DNA condensation that lead to chromosome segregation is proposed.

How to build segregation complexes in bacteria: Use bridges

In this issue of Genes & Development, Graham and colleagues (pp. 1228-1238) examine how ParBs, which bind to prokaryotic centromere-like partition sites, spread into nearby nonspecific DNA and assemble into higher-order protein-DNA complexes. Spreading is accomplished by looping rather than one-dimensional filamentation, thereby compacting the DNA into an extensively bridged complex.

Biology of the staphylococcal conjugative multiresistance plasmid pSK41

Plasmid pSK41 is a large, low-copy-number, conjugative plasmid from Staphylococcus aureus that is representative of a family of staphylococcal plasmids that confer multiple resistances to a wide range of antimicrobial agents. The plasmid consists of a conserved plasmid backbone containing the genes for plasmid housekeeping functions, which is punctuated by copies of IS257 that flank a Tn4001-hybrid structure and cointegrated plasmids that harbour resistance genes. This review summarises the current understanding of the biology of pSK41, focussing on the systems responsible for its replication, maintenance and transmission, and their regulation.

Single-molecule analysis of proteinxDNA complexes formed during partition of newly replicated plasmid molecules in Streptococcus pyogenes

The Streptococcus pyogenes pSM19035 partition locus is ubiquitous among plasmids from vancomycin- or methicillin-resistant bacteria. An increasing understanding of this segregation system may highlight novel protein targets that could be blocked to curb bacterial proliferation. pSM19035 segregation depends on two homodimeric (delta(2) (ParA) and omega(2) (ParB)) proteins and six cis-acting centromeric noncurved parS sites. In the presence of ATPxMg(2+), delta(2) (delta x ATP x Mg(2+))(2) binds DNA in a sequence-independent manner. Protein omega(2) binds with high affinity and cooperatively to B-form parS DNA. Atomic force microscopy experiments indicate that about 10 omega(2) molecules bind parS, consisting of 10 contiguous iterons. Protein (delta x ATP x Mg(2+))(2), by interacting with the N terminus of omega(2) bound to parS, loses its association with DNA and relocalizes with omega(2).parS to form a ternary complex ((deltaxATPxMg(2+))(2) x omega(2) x parS) with the DNA remaining in straight B-form. Then, the interaction of two (delta x ATP x Mg(2+))(2).omega(2).parS complexes via delta(2) promotes pairing of a plasmid subfraction. (deltaD60A x ATP x Mg(2+))(2), which binds but does not hydrolyze ATP, leads to accumulation of pairing intermediates, suggesting that ATP hydrolysis induces plasmid separation. We propose that the molar omega(2):delta(2) ratio regulates the different stages of pSM19035 segregation, pairing, and delta(2) polymerization, before cell division.

VirB alleviates H-NS repression of the icsP promoter in Shigella flexneri from sites more than one kilobase upstream of the transcription start site

The icsP promoter of Shigella spp. is repressed by H-NS and derepressed by VirB. Here, we show that an inverted repeat located between positions -1144 and -1130 relative to the icsP transcription start site is necessary for VirB-dependent derepression. The atypical location of this cis-acting site is discussed.

Whole-genome analysis of the chromosome partitioning and sporulation protein Spo0J (ParB) reveals spreading and origin-distal sites on the Bacillus subtilis chromosome

We investigated the genome-wide DNA binding of the chromosome partitioning and sporulation protein and ParB family member Spo0J in Bacillus subtilis using chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA microarrays. We identified 10 parS loci to which Spo0J binds, two of which were unexpectedly distant (> 1 Mb) from the origin of replication. We used all 10 sites to refine the consensus sequence for parS. We found that Spo0J spreads along the DNA around each site. Binding was near maximal levels up to 1.6 kb away from parS, and significantly above background as far away as 18 kb. Deletion of soj (parA) had little or no effect on spreading. In contrast, the spo0J93 allele appeared to cause a significant decrease in spreading in vivo, without significantly affecting the DNA binding affinity in vitro. spo0J93 causes a phenotype similar to that of a spo0J null mutant and alters the region thought to be involved in interaction between Spo0J dimers. Our findings indicate that spreading is important for in vivo function of Spo0J. Gene expression in areas near parS sites was similar in wild type and a spo0J null mutant, indicating that binding and spreading of Spo0J on DNA does not normally silence transcription of nearby genes.

Plasmid segregation mechanisms

Bacterial plasmids encode partitioning (par) loci that ensure ordered plasmid segregation prior to cell division. par loci come in two types: those that encode actin-like ATPases and those that encode deviant Walker-type ATPases. ParM, the actin-like ATPase of plasmid R1, forms dynamic filaments that segregate plasmids paired at mid-cell to daughter cells. Like microtubules, ParM filaments exhibit dynamic instability (i.e., catastrophic decay) whose regulation is an important component of the DNA segregation process. The Walker box ParA ATPases are related to MinD and form highly dynamic, oscillating filaments that are required for the subcellular movement and positioning of plasmids. The role of the observed ATPase oscillation is not yet understood. However, we propose a simple model that couples plasmid segregation to ParA oscillation. The model is consistent with the observed movement and localization patterns of plasmid foci and does not require the involvement of plasmid-specific host-encoded factors.

LeuO protein delimits the transcriptionally active and repressive domains on the bacterial chromosome

LeuO protein relieves bacterial gene silencer AT8-mediated transcriptional repression as part of a promoter relay mechanism found in the ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster. The gene silencing activity has recently been characterized as a nucleoprotein filament initiated at the gene silencer. In this gene locus, the nucleoprotein filament cis-spreads toward the target leuO promoter and results in the repression of the leuO gene. Although the cis-spreading nature of the transcriptionally repressive nucleoprotein filament has been revealed, the mechanism underlying LeuO-mediated gene silencing relief remains unknown. We have demonstrated here that LeuO functions analogously to the eukaryotic boundary element that delimits the transcriptionally active and repressive domains on the chromosome by blocking the cis-spreading pathway of the transcriptionally repressive heterochromatin. Given that one LeuO-binding site is positioned between the gene silencer and the target promoter, the simultaneous presence of a second LeuO-binding site synergistically enhances the blockade, resulting in a cooperative increase in LeuO-mediated gene silencing relief. A known DNA loop-forming protein, the lac repressor (LacI), was used to confirm that cooperative protein binding via DNA looping is responsible for the blocking synergy. Indeed, a distal LeuO site located downstream cooperates with the LeuO sites located upstream of the leuO gene, resulting in synergistic relief for the repressed leuO gene via looping out the intervening DNA between LeuO sites in the ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster.

Cloning and characterization of a region responsible for the maintenance of megaplasmid pTAV3 of Paracoccus versutus UW1

Using cointegrate formation, we constructed a basic replicon of the megaplasmid/mini-chromosome pTAV3 of Paracoccus versutus UW1. It is composed of two adjacent modules, responsible for plasmid replication (rep) and partitioning (par). Functional analysis of the par region identified a determinant of incompatibility (inc2), whose presence is crucial for proper partitioning (the partitioning site). Database searches revealed that the only known replicon with significant homology to that of pTAV3 is encoded by the chromosome cII of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. Incompatibility studies showed that closely related basic replicons are also encoded by megaplasmids (above 400 kb) harbored by four strains of P. pantotrophus. Basic replicons of the pTAV3-type are able to maintain large bacterial genomes, therefore they appear to be good candidates for the construction of vectors specific for Alphaproteobacteria.

Plasmid partitioning and the spreading of P1 partition protein ParB

Bacterial plasmids of low copy number, P1 prophage among them, are actively partitioned to nascent daughter cells. The process is typically mediated by a pair of plasmid-encoded proteins and a cis-acting DNA site or cluster of sites, referred to as the plasmid centromere. P1 ParB protein, which binds to the P1 centromere (parS), can spread for several kilobases along flanking DNA. We argue that studies of mutant ParB that demonstrated a strong correlation between spreading capacity and the ability to engage in partitioning may be misleading, and describe here a critical test of the dependence of partitioning on the spreading of the wild-type protein. Physical constraints imposed on the spreading of P1 ParB were found to have only a minor, but reproducible, effect on partitioning. We conclude that, whereas extensive ParB spreading is not required for partitioning, spreading may have an auxiliary role in the process.

ParG, a protein required for active partition of bacterial plasmids, has a dimeric ribbon-helix-helix structure

The ParG protein (8.6 kDa) is an essential component of the DNA partition complex of multidrug resistance plasmid TP228. ParG is a dimer in solution, interacts with DNA sequences upstream of the parFG genes and also with the ParF partition protein both in the absence and presence of target DNA. Here, the solution nuclear magnetic resonance structure of ParG is reported. The ParG dimer is composed of a folded domain formed by two closely intertwined C-terminal parts (residues 33-76), and two highly mobile tails consisting of N-terminal regions (residues 1-32). The folded part of ParG has the ribbon-helix-helix (RHH) architecture similar to that of the Arc/MetJ superfamily of DNA-binding transcriptional repressors, although the primary sequence similarity is very low. ParG interacts with DNA predominantly via its folded domain; this interaction is coupled with ParG oligomerization. The dimeric RHH structure of ParG suggests that it binds to DNA by inserting the double-stranded beta-sheet into the major groove of DNA, in a manner similar to transcriptional repressors from the Arc/MetJ superfamily, and that ParG can function as a transcriptional repressor itself. A new classification of proteins belonging to the Arc/MetJ superfamily and ParG homologues is proposed, based on the location of a conserved positively charged residue at either the beginning or at the end of the beta-strand which forms part of the DNA recognition motif.

Nucleoid restructuring in stationary-state bacteria

The textbook view of the bacterial cytoplasm as an unstructured environment has been overturned recently by studies that highlighted the extent to which non-random organization and coherent motion of intracellular components are central for bacterial life-sustaining activities. Because such a dynamic order critically depends on continuous consumption of energy, it cannot be perpetuated in starved, and hence energy-depleted, stationary-state bacteria. Here, we show that, at the onset of the stationary state, bacterial chromatin undergoes a massive reorganization into ordered toroidal structures through a process that is dictated by the intrinsic properties of DNA and by the ubiquitous starvation-induced DNA-binding protein Dps. As starvation proceeds, the toroidal morphology acts as a structural template that promotes the formation of DNA-Dps crystalline assemblies through epitaxial growth. Within the resulting condensed assemblies, DNA is effectively protected by means of structural sequestration. We thus conclude that the transition from bacterial active growth to stationary phase entails a co-ordinated process, in which the energy-dependent dynamic order of the chromatin is sequentially substituted with an equilibrium crystalline order.

Bacterial Mitotic Machineries

Here, we review recent progress that yields fundamental new insight into the molecular mechanisms behind plasmid and chromosome segregation in prokaryotic cells. In particular, we describe how prokaryotic actin homologs form mitotic machineries that segregate DNA before cell division. Thus, the ParM protein of plasmid R1 forms F actin-like filaments that separate and move plasmid DNA from mid-cell to the cell poles. Evidence from three different laboratories indicate that the morphogenetic MreB protein may be involved in segregation of the bacterial chromosome.

Effects of the P1 plasmid centromere on expression of P1 partition genes

The partition operon of P1 plasmid encodes two proteins, ParA and ParB, required for the faithful segregation of plasmid copies to daughter cells. The operon is followed by a centromere analog, parS, at which ParB binds. ParA, a weak ATPase, represses the par promoter most effectively in its ADP-bound form. ParB can recruit ParA to parS, stimulate its ATPase, and significantly stimulate the repression. We report here that parS also participates in the regulation of expression of the par genes. A single chromosomal parS was shown to augment repression of several copies of the par promoter by severalfold. The repression increase was sensitive to the levels of ParA and ParB and to their ratio. The increase may be attributable to a conformational change in ParA mediated by the parS-ParB complex, possibly acting catalytically. We also observed an in cis effect of parS which enhanced expression of parB, presumably due to a selective modulation of the mRNA level. Although ParB had been earlier found to spread into and silence genes flanking parS, silencing of the par operon by ParB spreading was not significant. Based upon analogies between partitioning and septum placement, we speculate that the regulatory switch controlled by the parS-ParB complex might be essential for partitioning itself.

Pairing of P1 plasmid partition sites by ParB

The mechanisms by which bacterial plasmids and chromosomes are partitioned are largely obscure, but it has long been assumed that the molecules to be separated are initially paired, as are sister chromatids in mitosis. We offer in vivo evidence that the partition protein ParB encoded by the bacterial plasmid P1 can pair cis-acting partition sites of P1 inserted in a small, multicopy plasmid. ParB was shown previously to be capable of extensive spreading along DNA flanking the partition sites. Experiments in which ParB spreading was constrained by physical roadblocks suggest that extensive spreading is not required for the pairing process.

A molecular mechanism for the repression of transcription by the H-NS protein

The H-NS protein is a major component of the bacterial nucleoid and plays a crucial role in the global gene regulation of enteric bacteria. Although H-NS does not exhibit a high DNA sequence specificity, a number of H-NS-responsive promoters have been shown to contain regions of intrinsic DNA curvature located either upstream or downstream of the transcription start point. We have studied H-NS binding to DNA and in vitro transcriptional regulation by H-NS at several synthetic promoters with or without curved sequences inserted upstream of the Pribnow box. We show how such inserts determine the final organization of H-NS-containing nucleoprotein complexes and how this affects transcription. We refine a two-step mechanism for the constitution of H-NS assemblies that are efficient in regulation.

Identification of the partitioning site within the repABC-type replicon of the composite Paracoccus versutus plasmid pTAV1

The replicator region of composite plasmid pTAV1 of Paracoccus versutus (included in mini-replicon pTAV320) belongs to the family of repABC replicons commonly found in plasmids harbored by Agrobacterium and Rhizobium spp. The repABC replicons encode three genes clustered in an operon, which are involved in partitioning (repA and repB) and replication (repC). In order to localize the partitioning site of pTAV320, the two identified incompatibility determinants of this mini-replicon (inc1, located in the intergenic sequence between repB and repC; and inc2, situated downstream of the repC gene) were PCR amplified and used together with purified RepB fusion protein (homologous to the type B partitioning proteins binding to the partitioning sites) in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. The protein bound only inc2, forming two complexes in a protein concentration-dependent manner. The inc2 region contains two long (14-bp) repeated sequences (R1 and R2). Disruption of these sequences completely eliminates RepB binding ability. R1 and R2 have sequence similarities with analogous repeats of another repABC replicon of plasmid pPAN1 of Paracoccus pantotrophus DSM 82.5 and with centromeric sequences of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome. Excess RepB protein resulted in destabilization of the inc2-containing plasmid in Escherichia coli. On the other hand, the inc2 region could stabilize another unstable replicon in P. versutus when RepA and RepB were delivered in trans, proving that this region has centromere-like activity. Thus, it was demonstrated that repA, repB, and inc2 constitute a functional system for active partitioning of pTAV320.

Determinants of segregational stability of the linear plasmid-prophage N15 of Escherichia coli

N15 is a bacteriophage of Escherichia coli that resembles lambda, but, unlike lambda, it lysogenizes as a linear plasmid. We show that stable maintenance of this unusual plasmid-prophage depends on the parA and parB genes, relatives of the partition genes of F and P1 plasmids. ParB of N15, like its F- and P1-encoded homologues, destabilizes plasmids carrying its target centromere, when present in excess. Within the genome of N15, we identified four unlinked, palindromic sequences that can promote the ParB-mediated destabilization of a moderate-copy vector in cis. They are distant from the parAB operon, unlike the centromeric sites of F and P1. Each of these palindromes could interact in vivo and in vitro with ParB. Each, when cloned separately, had properties characteristic of centromeric sites: exerted incompatibility against the N15 prophage and mini-N15 plasmids, and stabilized a mini-P1 plasmid depleted of its own partition genes when ParA and ParB of N15 were supplied. A pair of sites was more effective than a single site. Two of the centromeric sites are located in the proximity of promoters of phage genes, suggesting that, in addition to their function in partitioning of N15 prophage, they may control expression of N15 lytic functions.

A 72-base pair AT-rich DNA sequence element functions as a bacterial gene silencer

We have previously demonstrated that sequential activation of the bacterial ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster involves a promoter-relay mechanism. In the current study, we show that the final activation of the leuABCD operon is through a transcriptional derepression mechanism. The leuABCD operon is transcriptionally repressed by the presence of a 318-base pair AT-rich upstream element. LeuO is required for derepressing the repressed leuABCD operon. Deletion analysis of the repressive effect of the 318-bp element has led to the identification of a 72-bp AT-rich (78% A+T) DNA sequence element, AT4, which is capable of silencing a number of unrelated promoters in addition to the leuABCD promoter. AT4-mediated gene silencing is orientation-independent and occurs within a distance of 300 base pairs. Furthermore, an increased gene-silencing effect was observed with a tandemly repeated AT4 dimer. The possible mechanism of AT4-mediated gene silencing in bacteria is discussed.

Dynamic localization of bacterial and plasmid chromosomes

Plasmid-encoded partition genes determine the dynamic localization of plasmid molecules from the mid-cell position to the 1/4 and 3/4 positions. Similarly, bacterial homologs of the plasmid genes participate in controlling the bidirectional migration of the replication origin (oriC) regions during sporulation and vegetative growth in Bacillus subtilis, but not in Escherichia coli. In E. coli, but not B. subtilis, the chromosomal DNA is fully methylated by DNA adenine methyltransferase. The E. coli SeqA protein, which binds preferentially to hemimethylated nascent DNA strands, exists as discrete foci in vivo. A single SeqA focus, which is a SeqA-hemimethylated DNA cluster, splits into two foci that then abruptly migrate bidirectionally to the 1/4 and 3/4 positions during replication. Replicated oriC copies are linked to each other for a substantial period of generation time, before separating from each other and migrating in opposite directions. The MukFEB complex of E. coli and Smc of B. subtilis appear to participate in the reorganization of bacterial sister chromosomes.

DNA segregation in bacteria

Segregation of DNA in bacterial cells is an efficient process that assures that every daughter cell receives a copy of genomic and plasmid DNA. In this review, we focus primarily on observations in recent years, including the visualization of DNA and proteins at the subcellular level, that have begun to define the events that separate DNA molecules. Unlike the process of chromosome segregation in higher cells, segregation of the bacterial chromosome is a continuous process in which chromosomes are separated as they are replicated. Essential to separation is the initial movement of sister origins to opposite ends of the cell. Subsequent replication and controlled condensation of DNA are the driving forces that move sister chromosomes toward their respective origins, which establishes the polarity required for segregation. Final steps in the resolution and separation of sister chromosomes occur at the replication terminus, which is localized at the cell center. In contrast to the chromosome, segregation of low-copy plasmids, such as Escherichia coli F, P1, and R1, is by mechanisms that resemble those used in eukaryotic cells. Each plasmid has a centromere-like site to which plasmid-specified partition proteins bind to promote segregation. Replication of plasmid DNA, which occurs at the cell center, is followed by rapid partition protein-mediated separation of sister plasmids, which become localized at distinct sites on either side of the division plane. The fundamental similarity between chromosome and plasmid segregation-placement of DNA to specific cell sites-implies an underlying cellular architecture to which both DNA and proteins refer.

A SeqA hyperstructure and its interactions direct the replication and sequestration of DNA

A level of explanation in biology intermediate between macromolecules and cells has recently been proposed. This level is that of hyperstructures. One class of hyperstructures comprises the genes, mRNA, proteins and lipids that assemble to fulfil a particular function and disassemble when no longer required. To reason in terms of hyperstructures, it is essential to understand the factors responsible for their formation. These include the local concentration of sites on DNA and their cognate DNA-binding proteins. In Escherichia coli, the formation of a SeqA hyperstructure via the phenomenon of local concentration may explain how the binding of SeqA to hemimethylated GATC sequences leads to the sequestration of newly replicated origins of replication.

Plasmid and chromosome partitioning: surprises from phylogeny

Plasmids encode partitioning genes (par) that are required for faithful plasmid segregation at cell division. Initially, par loci were identified on plasmids, but more recently they were also found on bacterial chromosomes. We present here a phylogenetic analysis of par loci from plasmids and chromosomes from prokaryotic organisms. All known plasmid-encoded par loci specify three components: a cis-acting centromere-like site and two trans-acting proteins that form a nucleoprotein complex at the centromere (i.e. the partition complex). The proteins are encoded by two genes in an operon that is autoregulated by the par-encoded proteins. In all cases, the upstream gene encodes an ATPase that is essential for partitioning. Recent cytological analyses indicate that the ATPases function as adaptors between a host-encoded component and the partition complex and thereby tether plasmids and chromosomal origin regions to specific subcellular sites (i.e. the poles or quarter-cell positions). Two types of partitioning ATPases are known: the Walker-type ATPases encoded by the par/sop gene family (type I partitioning loci) and the actin-like ATPase encoded by the par locus of plasmid R1 (type II partitioning locus). A phylogenetic analysis of the large family of Walker type of partitioning ATPases yielded a surprising pattern: most of the plasmid-encoded ATPases clustered into distinct subgroups. Surprisingly, however, the par loci encoding these distinct subgroups have different genetic organizations and thus divide the type I loci into types Ia and Ib. A second surprise was that almost all chromosome-encoded ATPases, including members from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive Bacteria and Archaea, clustered into one distinct subgroup. The phylogenetic tree is consistent with lateral gene transfer between Bacteria and Archaea. Using database mining with the ParM ATPase of plasmid R1, we identified a new par gene family from enteric bacteria. These type II loci, which encode ATPases of the actin type, have a genetic organization similar to that of type Ib loci.

The partition system of multidrug resistance plasmid TP228 includes a novel protein that epitomizes an evolutionarily distinct subgroup of the ParA superfamily

The segregational stability of bacterial, low-copy-number plasmids is promoted primarily by active partition. The plasmid-specified components of the prototypical P1 plasmid partition system consist of two proteins, ParA (44.3 kDa) and ParB (38.5 kDa), which, in conjunction with integration host factor, form a nucleoprotein complex at the plasmid partition site, parS. This complex is the probable substrate for the directed temporal and spatial intracellular movement of plasmids before cell division. The genetic organization of the partition cassette of the multidrug resistance plasmid TP228 differs markedly from that of the P1 paradigm. The TP228 system includes a novel member (ParF; 22.0 kDa) of the ParA superfamily of ATPases, of which the P1 ParA protein is the archetype. However, the ParF protein and its immediate relatives form a discrete subgroup of the ParA superfamily, which evolutionarily is more related to the MinD subgroup of cell division proteins than to ParA of P1. The TP228 and P1 partition modules differ further in that the former does not include a parB homologue, but does specify a protein (ParG; 8.6 kDa) unrelated to ParB. Homologues of the parF gene are widely disseminated on eubacterial genomes, suggesting that ParF-mediated partition may be a common mechanism by which plasmid segregational stability is achieved.

Prokaryotic and eukaryotic chromosomes: what's the difference?

It is widely held that the profound differences in cellular architecture between prokaryotes and eukaryotes, in particular the housing of eukaryotic chromosomes within a nuclear membrane, also extends to the properties of their chromosomes. When chromosomal multiplicity, ploidy, linearity, transcriptional silencing, partitioning, and packaging are considered, no consistent association is found between any of these properties and the presence or absence of a nuclear membrane. Some of the perceived differences can be attributed to cytological limitations imposed by the small size of bacterial nucleoids and the arbitrary choice of representative organisms for comparison. We suggest that the criterion of nucleosome-based packaging of chromosomal DNA may be more useful than the prokaryote/eukaryote dichotomy for inferring the broadest phylogenetic relationships among organisms.

Transcriptional silencing in bacteria

Transcriptional silencing and repression are modes of negative control of gene expression that differ in specificity. Repressors, when present at promoter-specific binding sites, interfere locally with RNA polymerase function. Silencing proteins act by covering a continuous region of DNA, compete with a broader spectrum of proteins and are non-specific with respect to the promoters affected. Studies of transcriptional silencing promise an entrée to relatively unexplored areas of prokaryotic biology.

Intracellular localization of P1 ParB protein depends on ParA and parS

The P1 partition system promotes faithful plasmid segregation during the Escherichia coli cell cycle. This system consists of two proteins, ParA and ParB, that act on a plasmid site called parS. By immunofluorescence microscopy, we observed that ParB localizes to discrete foci that are most often located close to the one-quarter and three-quarters positions of cell length. The visualization of ParB foci depended completely on the presence of parS, although their visualization was independent of the chromosomal context of parS (in P1 or the bacterial chromosome). In integration host factor-defective mutants, in which ParB binding to parS is weakened, only a fraction of the total pool of ParB had converged into foci. Taken together, these results indicate that parS recruits a pool of ParB into foci and that the resulting ParB-parS complexes serve as substrates for the segregation reaction. In the absence of ParA, the position of ParB foci in cells is perturbed, indicating that at least one of the roles of ParA is to direct ParB-parS complexes to the proper one-quarter positions from a cell pole. Finally, inhibition of cell division did not inhibit localization of ParB foci in cells, indicating that the positioning signals in the E. coli host that are needed for P1 partition do not depend on early division events.

Long range interaction of cis-DNA elements mediated by architectural transcription factor Bach1

BACKGROUND

A central question in vertebrate transcriptional regulation is how cis-regulatory modules, including enhancers, silencers and promoters, communicate with each other over long distances to mandate proper gene expression. In order to address this question we analysed protein/DNA interactions in the human beta-globin locus control region (LCR). One of the many proteins that are potentially implicated in LCR function is Bach1. Bach1 possesses a basic leucine zipper (bZip) domain, as well as a BTB/POZ domain that has been shown to be involved in the regulation of chromatin structure. Bach1 forms heterodimers with small Maf proteins through its leucine zipper and binds to Maf recognition elements (MARE).

RESULTS

Using atomic force microscopy we visualized large looped DNA structures between MAREs located in different regulatory elements within the human beta-globin LCR that were mediated by Bach1/MafK heterodimers. The formation of these DNA loops required the Bach1 BTB/POZ protein interaction domain. Furthermore, in transfection studies we found that Bach1 repressed the enhancer activity of the LCR in a BTB/POZ domain-dependent manner.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that Bach1 and other BTB/POZ transcription factors may represent a class of nuclear architectural proteins that mediate long range interactions between cis-regulatory elements in order to regulate gene expression.