Depolarization affects the binding properties of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and their interaction with proteins of the exocytic apparatus

Voltage Sensors Embedded in G Protein-Coupled Receptors

Some signaling processes mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are modulated by membrane potential. In recent years, increasing evidence that GPCRs are intrinsically voltage-dependent has accumulated. A recent publication challenged the view that voltage sensors are embedded in muscarinic receptors. Herein, we briefly discuss the evidence that supports the notion that GPCRs themselves are voltage-sensitive proteins and an alternative mechanism that suggests that voltage-gated sodium channels are the voltage-sensing molecules involved in such processes.

G Protein-Coupled Receptors Regulated by Membrane Potential

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in a vast majority of signal transduction processes. Although they span the cell membrane, they have not been considered to be regulated by the membrane potential. Numerous studies over the last two decades have demonstrated that several GPCRs, including muscarinic, adrenergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic receptors, are voltage regulated. Following these observations, an effort was made to elucidate the molecular basis for this regulatory effect. In this review, we will describe the advances in understanding the voltage dependence of GPCRs, the suggested molecular mechanisms that underlie this phenomenon, and the possible physiological roles that it may play.

GPCR voltage dependence controls neuronal plasticity and behavior

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a paramount role in diverse brain functions. Almost 20 years ago, GPCR activity was shown to be regulated by membrane potential in vitro, but whether the voltage dependence of GPCRs contributes to neuronal coding and behavioral output under physiological conditions in vivo has never been demonstrated. Here we show that muscarinic GPCR mediated neuronal potentiation in vivo is voltage dependent. This voltage dependent potentiation is abolished in mutant animals expressing a voltage independent receptor. Depolarization alone, without a muscarinic agonist, results in a nicotinic ionotropic receptor potentiation that is mediated by muscarinic receptor voltage dependency. Finally, muscarinic receptor voltage independence causes a strong behavioral effect of increased odor habituation. Together, this study identifies a physiological role for the voltage dependency of GPCRs by demonstrating crucial involvement of GPCR voltage dependence in neuronal plasticity and behavior. Thus, this study suggests that GPCR voltage dependency plays a role in many diverse neuronal functions including learning and memory.

Voltage affects the dissociation rate constant of the m2 muscarinic receptor

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest protein family and mediate the vast majority of signal transduction processes in the body. Until recently GPCRs were not considered to be voltage dependent. Newly it was shown for several GPCRs that the first step in GPCR activation, the binding of agonist to the receptor, is voltage sensitive: Voltage shifts the receptor between two states that differ in their binding affinity. Here we show that this shift involves the rate constant of dissociation. We used the m2 muscarinic receptor (m2R) a prototypical GPCR and measured directly the dissociation of [(3)H]ACh from m2R expressed Xenopus oocytes. We show, for the first time, that the voltage dependent change in affinity is implemented by voltage shifting the receptor between two states that differ in their rate constant of dissociation. Furthermore, we provide evidence that suggest that the above shift is achieved by voltage regulating the coupling of the GPCR to its G protein.

What are the mechanisms for analogue and digital signalling in the brain?

Synaptic transmission in the brain generally depends on action potentials. However, recent studies indicate that subthreshold variation in the presynaptic membrane potential also determines spike-evoked transmission. The informational content of each presynaptic action potential is therefore greater than initially expected. The contribution of this synaptic property, which is a fast (from 0.01 to 10 s) and state-dependent modulation of functional coupling, has been largely underestimated and could have important consequences for our understanding of information processing in neural networks. We discuss here how the membrane voltage of the presynaptic terminal might modulate neurotransmitter release by mechanisms that do not involve a change in presynaptic Ca(2+) influx.

Depolarization induces a conformational change in the binding site region of the M2 muscarinic receptor

G protein-coupled receptors play a central role in signal transduction and were only known to be activated by agonists. Recently it has been shown that membrane potential also affects the activity of G protein-coupled receptors. For the M(2) muscarinic receptor, it was further shown that depolarization induces charge movement. A tight correlation was found between the voltage-dependence of the charge movement and the voltage-dependence of the agonist binding. Here we examine whether depolarization-induced charge movement causes a conformational change in the M(2) receptor that may be responsible for the voltage-dependence of agonist binding. Using site-directed fluorescence labeling we show a voltage-dependent fluorescence signal, reflecting a conformational change, which correlates with the voltage-dependent charge movement. We further show that selected mutations in the orthosteric site abolish the fluorescence signal and concomitantly, the voltage-dependence of the agonist binding. Surprisingly, mutations in the allosteric site also abolished the voltage-dependence of agonist binding but did not reduce the fluorescence signal. Finally, we show that treatments, which reduced the charge movement or hindered the coupling between the charge movement and the voltage-dependent binding, also reduced the fluorescence signal. Our results demonstrate that depolarization-induced conformational changes in the orthosteric binding site underlie the voltage-dependence of agonist binding. Our results are also unique in suggesting that the allosteric site is also involved in controlling the voltage-dependent agonist binding.

Modulation of M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors by interacting proteins

Protein-protein interactions represent an important mechanism for posttranslational modifications of protein expression and function. In brain cells, surface-expressed and membrane-bound neurotransmitter receptors are common proteins that undergo dynamic protein-protein interactions between their intracellular domains and submembranous regulatory proteins. Recently, the Gα(i/o)-coupled muscarinic M4 receptor (M4R) has been revealed to be one of these receptors. Through direct interaction with the intracellular loops or C-terminal tails of M4Rs, M4R interacting proteins (M4RIPs) vigorously regulate the efficacy of M4R signaling. A synapse-enriched protein kinase, Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), exemplifies a prototype model of M4RIPs, and is capable of binding to the second intracellular loop of M4Rs. Through an activity- and phosphorylation-dependent mechanism, CaMKII potentiates the M4R/Gα(i/o)-mediated inhibition of M4R efficacy in inhibiting adenylyl cyclase and cAMP production. In striatal neurons where M4Rs are most abundantly expressed, M4RIPs dynamically control M4R activity to maintain a proper cholinergic tone in these neurons. This is critical for maintaining the acetylcholine-dopamine balance in the basal ganglia, which determines the behavioral responsiveness to dopamine stimulation by psychostimulants.

A novel fast mechanism for GPCR-mediated signal transduction--control of neurotransmitter release

In addition to calcium influx, charge movement in the G protein–coupled M₂-muscarinic receptor is required for the control of acetylcholine release.

Reliable neuronal communication depends on accurate temporal correlation between the action potential and neurotransmitter release. Although a requirement for Ca²⁺ in neurotransmitter release is amply documented, recent studies have shown that voltage-sensitive G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are also involved in this process. However, how slow-acting GPCRs control fast neurotransmitter release is an unsolved question. Here we examine whether the recently discovered fast depolarization-induced charge movement in the M₂-muscarinic receptor (M₂R) is responsible for M₂R-mediated control of acetylcholine release. We show that inhibition of the M₂R charge movement in Xenopus oocytes correlated well with inhibition of acetylcholine release at the mouse neuromuscular junction. Our results suggest that, in addition to Ca²⁺ influx, charge movement in GPCRs is also necessary for release control.

Control of neurotransmitter release: From Ca2+ to voltage dependent G-protein coupled receptors

This review discusses two theories that try to explain mechanisms of control of neurotransmitter release in fast synapses: the Ca(2+) hypothesis and the Ca(2+) voltage hypothesis. The review summarizes experimental results that are incompatible with predictions from the Ca(2+) hypothesis and concludes that Ca(2+) is involved in the control of the amount of release but not in the control of the time course of evoked release, i.e., initiation and termination of evoked release. Results summarizing direct effects of changes in membrane potential on the release machinery are then presented. These changes in membrane potential affect the affinity (for the transmitter) of presynaptic autoinhibitory G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The voltage dependence of these GPCRs and their pivotal role in determining the time course of evoked release is discussed.

Molecular mechanisms that control initiation and termination of physiological depolarization-evoked transmitter release

Ca(2+) is essential for physiological depolarization-evoked synchronous neurotransmitter release. But, whether Ca(2+) influx or another factor controls release initiation is still under debate. The time course of ACh release is controlled by a presynaptic inhibitory G protein-coupled autoreceptor (GPCR), whose agonist-binding affinity is voltage-sensitive. However, the relevance of this property for release control is not known. To resolve this question, we used pertussis toxin (PTX), which uncouples GPCR from its G(i/o) and in turn reduces the affinity of GPCR toward its agonist. We show that PTX enhances ACh and glutamate release (in mice and crayfish, respectively) and, most importantly, alters the time course of release without affecting Ca(2+) currents. These effects are not mediated by G(beta)gamma because its microinjection into the presynaptic terminal did not alter the time course of release. Also, PTX reduces the association of the GPCR with the exocytotic machinery, and this association is restored by the addition of agonist. We offer the following mechanism for control of initiation and termination of physiological depolarization-evoked transmitter release. At rest, release is under tonic block achieved by the transmitter-bound high-affinity presynaptic GPCR interacting with the exocytotic machinery. Upon depolarization, the GPCR uncouples from its G protein and consequently shifts to a low-affinity state toward the transmitter. The transmitter dissociates, the unbound GPCR detaches from the exocytotic machinery, and the tonic block is alleviated. The free machinery, together with Ca(2+) that had already entered, initiates release. Release terminates when the reverse occurs upon repolarization.

An organelle proteomic method to study neurotransmission-related proteins, applied to a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia

Limited information is currently available on molecular events that underlie schizophrenia-like behaviors in animal models. Accordingly, we developed an organelle proteomic approach enabling the study of neurotransmission-related proteins in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of postpubertal (postnatal day 60 (PD60)) neonatally ventral hippocampal (nVH) lesioned rats, an extensively used neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia-like behaviors. The PFC was chosen because of its purported role in the etiology of the disease. Statistical analysis of 392 reproducible spots on 2-D organelle proteomic patterns revealed significant changes in intensity of 18 proteinous spots in plasma membrane-enriched fractions obtained from postpubertal nVH lesioned rats compared to controls. Mass spectrometric analysis and database searching allowed the identification of a single protein in each of the nine differential spots, including proteins of low abundance, such as neurocalcin delta. Most of the identified dysregulated proteins, including clathrin light chain B, syntaxin binding protein 1b and visinin-like protein 1 are known to be linked to various neurotransmitter systems and to play key roles in plasma membrane receptor expression and recycling as well as synaptic vesicle exocytosis/recycling. Organelle proteomic approaches have hence proved to be most useful to identify key proteins linked to a given behavior in animal models of brain diseases.

The chemical synapse goes electric: Ca2+- and voltage-sensitive GPCRs control neurotransmitter release

It is widely believed that the initiation of transmitter release in fast synapses is triggered by rapid Ca2+ entry and that the termination of release is governed by removal of Ca2+ from below the release sites. We argue that, although Ca2+ is essential for release, fast-entry kinetics render Ca2+ incapable of being the limiting factor for the initiation of release, and the relatively slow removal of Ca2+ cannot be the limiting factor for the termination of release. We suggest, and provide supporting evidence for, a novel general mechanism for control of fast transmitter release (in the range of milliseconds) from nerve terminals. According to this mechanism, two factors control release: Ca2+ and voltage-sensitive presynaptic inhibitory G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Inhibitory autoreceptors are known to mediate slow feedback inhibition of transmitter release. We discuss the evidence showing that these receptors also control the initiation and termination of transmitter release by directly interacting with core proteins in the exocytotic machinery. This novel mechanism has important implications for understanding the regulation of transmitter release, synaptic plasticity and neuronal circuit properties.

Second-by-second measurement of acetylcholine release in prefrontal cortex

Microdialysis has been widely used to measure acetylcholine (ACh) release in vivo and has provided important insights into the regulation of cholinergic transmission. However, microdialysis can be constrained by limited spatial and temporal resolution. The present experiments utilize a microelectrode array (MEA) to rapidly measure ACh release and clearance in anaesthetized rats. The array electrochemically detects, on a second-by-second basis, changes in current selectively produced by the hydrolysis of ACh to choline (Ch) and the subsequent oxidation of choline and hydrogen peroxidase (H(2)O(2)) at the electrode surface. In vitro calibration of the microelectrode revealed linear responses to ACh (R(2) = 0.9998), limit of detection of 0.08 microm, and signal-to-noise ratio of 3.0. The electrode was unresponsive to ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA), or norepinephrine (NE) interferents. In vivo experiments were conducted in prefrontal cortex (PFC) of anaesthetized rats. Pressure ejections of ACh (10 mm; 40 nL) through an adjoining micropipette produced a rapid rise in current, reaching maximum amplitude in approximately 1.0 s and cleared by 80% within 4-11 s. Endogenously released ACh, following local depolarization with KCl (70 mm; 40, 160 nL), was detected at values as low as 0.05 microm. These signals were volume-dependent and cleared within 4-12 s. Finally, nicotine (1.0 mm, 80 nL) stimulated ACh signals. Nicotine-induced signals reflected the hydrolysis of ACh by endogenous acetylcholinesterase (AChE) as inhibition of the enzyme following perfusion with neostigmine (10 microm) attenuated the signal (40-94%). Collectively, these data validate a novel method for rapidly measuring cholinergic transmission in vivo with a spatial and temporal resolution that far exceeds conventional microdialysis.

Movement of 'gating charge' is coupled to ligand binding in a G-protein-coupled receptor

Activation by agonist binding of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) controls most signal transduction processes. Although these receptors span the cell membrane, they are not considered to be voltage sensitive. Recently it was shown that both the activity of GPCRs and their affinity towards agonists are regulated by membrane potential. However, it remains unclear whether GPCRs intrinsically respond to changes in membrane potential. Here we show that two prototypical GPCRs, the m2 and m1 muscarinic receptors (m2R and m1R), display charge-movement-associated currents analogous to 'gating currents' of voltage-gated channels. The gating charge-voltage relationship of m2R correlates well with the voltage dependence of the affinity of the receptor for acetylcholine. The loop that couples m2R and m1R to their G protein has a crucial function in coupling voltage sensing to agonist-binding affinity. Our data strongly indicate that GPCRs serve as sensors for both transmembrane potential and external chemical signals.

On the Feedback Between Theory and Experiment in Elucidating the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Neurotransmitter Release

This review describes the development of the molecular level Ca(2+)-voltage hypothesis. Theoretical considerations and feedback between theory and experiments played a key role in its development. The theory, backed by experiments, states that at fast synapses, membrane potential by means of presynaptic inhibitory autoreceptors controls initiation and termination of neurotransmitter release. A molecular kinetic scheme which depicts initiation and termination of evoked release is discussed. This scheme is able to account for both spontaneous release and evoked release. The physiological implications of this scheme are enumerated.

Release of Neurotransmitter Induced by Ca2+-Uncaging: Reexamination of the Ca-Voltage Hypothesis for Release

The primacy of Ca2+ in controlling the amount of released neurotransmitter is well established. However, it is not yet clear what controls the time-course (initiation and termination) of release. Various experiments indicated that the time-course is controlled by membrane potential per se. Consequently the phenomenological Ca-Voltage-Hypothesis (CVH) was formulated. The CVH was later embodied in a molecular level mathematical model, whose key predictions were affirmed experimentally. Nonetheless, the single most important basis for the CVH, namely that depolarization per se is needed to induce physiological phasic release, was challenged by two major experimental findings. (i) Release was induced by Ca2+ alone by means of Ca2+-uncaging. (ii) There was at most a small additional effect when depolarization was applied after release was induced by Ca2+-uncaging. Point (i) was dealt with previously, but additional conclusions are drawn here. Here we concentrate on (ii) and show that the experimental results can be fully accounted for by the molecular level CVH model, with essentially the same parameters.

The sperm, a neuron with a tail: 'neuronal' receptors in mammalian sperm

A number of plasma membrane receptor types originally thought to be specific to neurons have been found in other somatic cells. More surprisingly, the mammalian sperm and neuron appear to share many of these 'neuronal' receptors. The morphology, chromosome number, genomic activity, and functions of those two cell types are as unlike as any two cells in the body, but they both achieve their highly disparate goals with the aid of a number of the same receptors. Exocytosis in neurons and sperm is essential to the functions of these cells and is strongly influenced by similar receptors. 'Neuronal' receptor types in sperm may also play a role in the control of sperm motility (a function of course not shared by neurons). This review will consider the evidence for the presence of sperm plasma membrane 'neuronal' receptors and for their significance to mammalian sperm function. The persuasiveness of the evidence varies depending on the receptor being considered, but there is strong experimental support for the presence and importance of a number of 'neuronal' receptors in sperm.

Depolarization initiates phasic acetylcholine release by relief of a tonic block imposed by presynaptic M2 muscarinic receptors

The role of presynaptic muscarinic autoreceptors in the initiation of phasic acetylcholine (ACh) release at frog and mouse neuromuscular junctions was studied by measuring the dependency of the amount (m) of ACh release on the level of presynaptic depolarization. Addition of methoctramine (a blocker of M2 muscarinic receptors), or of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), increased release in a voltage-dependent manner; enhancement of release declined as the depolarizing pulse amplitude increased. In frogs and wild-type mice the slope of log m/log pulse amplitude (PA) was reduced from about 7 in the control to about 4 in the presence of methoctramine or AChE. In M2 muscarinic receptor knockout mice, the slope of log m/log PA was much smaller (about 4) and was not further reduced by addition of either methoctramine or AChE. The effect of a brief (0.1 ms), but strong (-1.2 microA) depolarizing prepulse on the dependency of m on PA was also studied. The depolarizing prepulse had effects similar to those of methoctramine and AChE. In particular, it enhanced release of test pulses in a voltage-dependent manner and reduced the slope of log m/log PA from about 7 to about 4. Methoctramine + AChE occluded the prepulse effects. In knockout mice, the depolarizing prepulse had no effects. The cumulative results suggest that initiation of phasic ACh release is achieved by depolarization-mediated relief of a tonic block imposed by presynaptic M2 muscarinic receptors.

Activity-dependent hepatocyte growth factor expression and its role in organogenesis and cancer growth suppression

Studies by Murphy et al. have shown that neuronal stimulation can activate immediate early genes that code for transcription factors. Recent data suggest that Ca(2+) elevation in both neuronal cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments is responsible for the coupling of synaptic excitation to gene expression. Deisseroth et al. suggest that Ca(2+) influx through L-type voltage-sensitive Ca(2+) channels (VSCCs) activates cytoplasmic Ca(2+) targets such as calmodulin (CaM). The Ca(2+)-CaM complex then translocates to the nucleus leading to Ca(2+) and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation and gene expression. Reports have shown that L-type VSCCs are found on the vagus nerve. Other studies have suggested that activation of L-type VSCCs leads to a Ca(2+) store-dependent elevation of nuclear [Ca(2+)] that triggers gene expression by more direct activation of nuclear Ca(2+)/CaM-dependent protein kinase (CaMK). Moreover, nuclear transcription factors such as DREAM are themselves Ca(2+)-dependent, further supporting the importance of both nuclear and cytoplasmic Ca(2+) elevation in regulating gene expression. Our simulation studies suggest that intense synaptic stimulation in combination with amplification by release from intracellular Ca(2+) stores can produce elevations in nuclear Ca(2+) concentration and CaMK phosphorylation leading to CREB phosphorylation and gene expression. One of the downstream events would be the production of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). HGF has trophic, repair, therapeutic or mitotic effect on kidney, pancreas, spleen, liver, lung, heart and spinal cord. These organs and systems' regeneration can be achieved by either upregulation of HGF release from the vagus nerve or upregulation of HGF production within the system (spinal cord). Conversely, inhibition of HGF release from the vagus nerve can inhibit cancer growth. Vagus nerve seems to be the nerve that nature intends to regulate organ growth and regeneration, it is very possible that other than HGF and injurin, other growth factors could be found in the vagus nerve. Electrical depolarization and hyperpolarization of the vagus nerve would be the most natural and effective way to induce organ regeneration and suppress cancer growth, respectively. A similar pathway seems to exist for different organs as HGF has trophic, repair, therapeutic or mitotic effect on different vagally innervated organs.

Acetylcholine release from the carotid body by hypoxia: evidence for the involvement of autoinhibitory receptors

The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether hypoxia influences acetylcholine (ACh) release from the rabbit carotid body and, if so, to determine the mechanism(s) associated with this response. ACh is expressed in the rabbit carotid body (5.6 +/- 1.3 pmol/carotid body) as evidenced by electrochemical analysis. Immunocytochemical analysis of the primary cultures of the carotid body with antibody specific to ACh further showed that ACh-like immunoreactivity is localized to many glomus cells. The effect of hypoxia on ACh release was examined in ex vivo carotid bodies harvested from anesthetized rabbits. The basal release of ACh during normoxia ( approximately 150 Torr) averaged 5.9 +/- 0.5 fmol.min-1.carotid body-1. Lowering the Po2 to 90 and 20 Torr progressively decreased ACh release by approximately 15 and approximately 68%, respectively. ACh release returned to the basal value on reoxygenation. Simultaneous monitoring of dopamine showed a sixfold increase in dopamine release during hypoxia. Hypercapnia (21% O2 + 10% CO2) as well as high K+ (100 mM) facilitated ACh release from the carotid body, suggesting that hypoxia-induced inhibition of ACh release is not due to deterioration of the carotid body. Hypoxia had no significant effect on acetylcholinesterase activity in the medium, implying that increased hydrolysis of ACh does not account for hypoxia-induced inhibition of ACh release. In the presence of either atropine (10 microM) or domperidone (10 microM), hypoxia stimulated ACh release. These results demonstrate that glomus cells of the rabbit carotid body express ACh and that hypoxia overall inhibits ACh release via activation of muscarinic and dopaminergic autoinhibitory receptors in the carotid body.

The M2 muscarinic G-protein-coupled receptor is voltage-sensitive

G-protein coupled receptors are not considered to exhibit voltage sensitivity. Here, using Xenopus oocytes, we show that the M2 muscarinic receptor (m2R) is voltage-sensitive. The m2R-mediated potassium channel (GIRK) currents were used to assay the activity of m2R. We found that the apparent affinity of m2R toward acetylcholine (ACh) was reduced upon depolarization. Binding experiments of [3H]ACh to individual oocytes expressing m2R confirmed the electrophysiological findings. When the GIRK channels were activated either by overexpression of Gbetagamma subunits or by injection of GTPgammaS, the ratio between the currents measured at -60 mV and +40 mV was the same as for the basal activity of the GIRK channel. Thus, the steps downstream to agonist activation of m2R are not voltage-sensitive. We further found that, in contrast to m2R, the apparent affinity of m1R was increased upon depolarization. We also found that the voltage sensitivity of binding of [3H]ACh to oocytes expressing m2R was greatly diminished following pretreatment with pertussis toxin. The cumulative results suggest that m2R is, by itself, voltage-sensitive. Furthermore, the voltage sensitivity does not reside in the ACh binding site, rather, it most likely resides in the receptor region that couples to the G-protein.

Regulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor signaling

Multiple mechanisms regulate the signaling of the five members of the family of the guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein)-coupled muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (mAChRs). Following activation by classical or allosteric agonists, mAChRs can be phosphorylated by a variety of receptor kinases and second messenger-regulated kinases. The phosphorylated mAChR subtypes can interact with beta-arrestin and presumably other adaptor proteins as well. As a result, the various mAChR signaling pathways may be differentially altered, leading to short-term or long-term desensitization of a particular signaling pathway, receptor-mediated activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway downstream of mAChR phosphorylation, as well as long-term potentiation of mAChR-mediated phospholipase C stimulation. Agonist activation of mAChRs may also induce receptor internalization and down-regulation, which proceed in a highly regulated manner, depending on receptor subtype and cell type. In this review, our current understanding of the complex regulatory processes that underlie signaling of mAChR is summarized.

Use of knockout mice reveals involvement of M2-muscarinic receptors in control of the kinetics of acetylcholine release

We have previously suggested that presynaptic M(2)-muscarinic receptors (M(2)R) are involved in the control of the time course of evoked acetylcholine release in the frog neuromuscular junction. The availability of knockout mice lacking functional M(2)R (M(2)-KO) enabled us to address this issue in a more direct way. Using the phrenic diaphragm preparation, we show that in wild-type (WT) mice experimental manipulations known to affect Ca(2+) entry and removal, greatly affected the amount of acetylcholine released (quantal content). However, the time course of release remained unaltered under all these experimental treatments. On the other hand, in the M(2)-KO mice, similar experimental treatments affected both the quantal content and the time course of release. In general, a larger quantal content was accompanied by a longer duration of release. Similarly, the rise time of the postsynaptic current produced by axon stimulation was sensitive to changes in [Ca(2+)](o) or [Mg(2+)](o) in M(2)-KO mice but not in WT mice. Measurements of Ca(2+) currents revealed that the shorter rise time of the postsynaptic current seen in high [Mg(2+)](o) in M(2)-KO mice was not produced by a shorter wave of the presynaptic Ca(2+) current. These results support our earlier findings and provide direct evidence for the major role that presynaptic M(2)-muscarinic receptors play in the control of the time course of evoked acetylcholine release under physiological conditions.

Pyridostigmine enhances glutamatergic transmission in hippocampal CA1 neurons

Pyridostigmine, a carbamate acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor, is routinely employed in the treatment of the autoimmune disease myasthenia gravis. Due to its positively charged ammonium group, under normal conditions pyridostigmine cannot cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and penetrate the brain. However, several studies have suggested that under conditions in which the BBB is disrupted, pyridostigmine enters the brain, changes cortical excitability, and leads to long-lasting alterations in gene expression. The aim of this study was to characterize the mechanisms underlying pyridostigmine-induced changes in the excitability of central neurons. Using whole cell intracellular recordings in hippocampal neurons we show that pyridostigmine decreases repetitive firing adaptation and increases the appearance of excitatory postsynaptic potentials. In voltage clamp recordings, both pyridostigmine and acetylcholine (ACh) increased the frequency but not the amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic currents. These effects were reversible upon the administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist, atropine, and were not blocked by tetrodotoxin. We conclude that pyridostigmine, by increasing free ACh levels, causes muscarinic-dependent enhancement of excitatory transmission. This mechanism may explain central side effects previously attributed to this drug as well as the potency of AChE inhibitors, including nerve-gas agents and organophosphate pesticides, in the initiation of cortical synchronization, epileptic discharge, and excitotoxic damage.

Group III metabotropic glutamate receptors as autoreceptors in the cerebellar cortex

1. Group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) of the subtype 4a are localized within presynaptic active zones of cerebellar parallel fibre (PF)-Purkinje cell (PC) synapses. In order to investigate the conditions necessary for group III mGluR autoreceptor-activation by synaptically released glutamate, we characterized the effects of selective agonists and antagonists on excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked by several distinct PF stimulation patterns. 2. The group III mGluR-selective agonist L-AP4 depressed evoked EPSCs at PF-PC synapses in rat brain slices with an EC(50) of 2.4 microM and maximum inhibition of 80%. This L-AP4-induced depression was antagonized by the group III mGluR-selective antagonist MSOP with an estimated equilibrium dissaciation constant of 12.5 microM. 3. Paired-pulse or four-pulse PF stimulations did not activate presynaptic group III mGluRs as revealed by the lack of effect of 1 mM MSOP on relative test EPSC amplitudes with latencies of 250-500 ms. The potentiation of a test EPSC evoked 200-500 ms after a short tetanic burst (100 Hz for 60 ms), was also unchanged in the presence of MSOP. 4. Endogenous autoreceptor-activation was revealed only during prolonged stimulation trains (10 Hz for 4.4 s), where, in the presence of 1 mM MSOP, the EPSC amplitudes were enhanced by 15%. 5. These observations support an autoreceptor function of group III mGluRs and a role in short-term synaptic plasticity at PF synapses. However, the low to moderate activation levels observed, despite the close spatial relation with glutamate release sites, suggests that additional mechanisms regulate receptor activation.

Can the Ca2+ hypothesis and the Ca2+-voltage hypothesis for neurotransmitter release be reconciled?

It is well established that Ca2+ plays a key role in promoting the physiological depolarization-induced release (DIR) of neurotransmitters from nerve terminals (Ca2+ hypothesis). Yet, evidence has accumulated for the Ca2+-voltage hypothesis, which states that not only is Ca2+ required, but membrane potential as such also plays a pivotal role in promoting DIR. An essential aspect of the Ca2+-voltage hypothesis is that it is depolarization that is responsible for the initiation of release. This assertion seems to be contradicted by recent experiments wherein release was triggered by high concentrations of intracellular Ca2+ in the absence of depolarization [calcium-induced release (CIR)]. Here we show that there is no contradiction between CIR and the Ca2+-voltage hypothesis. Rather, CIR can be looked at as a manifestation of spontaneous release under conditions of high intracellular Ca2+ concentration. Spontaneous release in turn is governed by a subset of the molecular scheme for DIR, under conditions of no depolarization. Prevailing estimates for the intracellular calcium concentration, [Ca2+]i, in physiological DIR rely on experiments under conditions of CIR. Our theory suggests that these estimates are too high, because depolarization is absent in these experiments and [Ca2+]i is held at high levels for an extended period.

Ca2+-independent feedback inhibition of acetylcholine release in frog neuromuscular junction

The effect of membrane potential on feedback inhibition of acetylcholine (ACh) release was studied using the frog neuromuscular junction. It was found that membrane potential affects the functional affinity (K(i)) of the presynaptic M2 muscarinic receptor. The K(i) for muscarine shifts from approximately 0.23 microm (at resting potential) to approximately 8 microm (at a high depolarization). Measurements of Ca2+ currents in axon terminals showed that the depolarization-mediated shift in K(i) does not stem from depolarization-dependent changes in Ca2+ influx. Pretreatments with pertussis toxin (PTX) abolished the depolarization-dependent shift in K(i); at all depolarizations K(i) was the same and higher (approximately 32 microm) than before PTX treatment. The inhibitory effect of muscarine on ACh release is produced by two independent mechanisms: a slow, PTX-sensitive process, which prevails at low to medium depolarizations and operates already at low muscarine concentrations, and a fast, PTX-insensitive and voltage-independent process, which requires higher muscarine concentrations. Neither of the two processes involves a reduction in Ca2+ influx.

Presynaptic M(2) muscarinic receptors are involved in controlling the kinetics of ACh release at the frog neuromuscular junction

1. Macropatch recording was used to study release of acetylcholine in the frog neuromuscular junction evoked by either direct local depolarization or by an action potential. 2. The quantal content was established by directly counting the released quanta. The time course of release was obtained by constructing synaptic delay histograms. 3. Perfusion of the neuromuscular junction with methoctramine, a selective M(2)/M(4) muscarinic antagonist, increased the quantal content and slowed the exponential decay of the synaptic delay histograms. Addition of the agonist muscarine reversed these effects. 4. Addition of acetylcholinesterase prolonged the decay of the delay histogram, and muscarine reversed this effect. 5. Methoctramine slowed the rise time of the postsynaptic current produced by axon stimulation without affecting either the excitatory nerve terminal current or the presynaptic Ca(2+) current. 6. These results show that presynaptic M(2) muscarinic receptors are involved in the process which terminates evoked ACh release.

Direct interaction of a brain voltage-gated K+ channel with syntaxin 1A: functional impact on channel gating

Presynaptic voltage-gated K(+) (Kv) channels play a physiological role in the regulation of transmitter release by virtue of their ability to shape presynaptic action potentials. However, the possibility of a direct interaction of these channels with the exocytotic apparatus has never been examined. We report the existence of a physical interaction in brain synaptosomes between Kvalpha1.1 and Kvbeta subunits with syntaxin 1A, occurring, at least partially, within the context of a macromolecular complex containing syntaxin, synaptotagmin, and SNAP-25. The interaction was altered after stimulation of neurotransmitter release. The interaction with syntaxin was further characterized in Xenopus oocytes by both overexpression and antisense knock-down of syntaxin. Direct physical interaction of syntaxin with the channel protein resulted in an increase in the extent of fast inactivation of the Kv1.1/Kvbeta1.1 channel. Syntaxin also affected the channel amplitude in a biphasic manner, depending on its concentration. At low syntaxin concentrations there was a significant increase in amplitudes, with no detectable change in cell-surface channel expression. At higher concentrations, however, the amplitudes decreased, probably because of a concomitant decrease in cell-surface channel expression, consistent with the role of syntaxin in regulation of vesicle trafficking. The observed physical and functional interactions between syntaxin 1A and a Kv channel may play a role in synaptic efficacy and neuronal excitability.

Novel mechanism for presynaptic inhibition: GABA(A) receptors affect the release machinery

Presynaptic inhibition is produced by increasing Cl(-) conductance, resulting in an action potential of a smaller amplitude at the excitatory axon terminals. This, in turn, reduces Ca(2+) entry to produce a smaller release. For this mechanism to operate, the "inhibitory" effect of shunting should last during the arrival of the "excitatory" action potential to its terminals, and to achieve that, the inhibitory action potential should precede the excitatory action potential. Using the crayfish neuromuscular preparation which is innervated by one excitatory axon and one inhibitory axon, we found, at 12 degrees C, prominent presynaptic inhibition when the inhibitory action potential followed the excitatory action potential by 1, and even 2, ms. The presynaptic excitatory action potential and the excitatory nerve terminal current (ENTC) were not altered, and Ca(2+) imaging at single release boutons showed that this "late" presynaptic inhibition did not result from a reduction in Ca(2+) entry. Since 50 microM picrotoxin blocked this late component of presynaptic inhibition, we suggest that gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA(A)) receptors reduce transmitter release also by a mechanism other than affecting Ca(2+) entry.

Autoreceptors, membrane potential and the regulation of transmitter release

It has been suggested that depolarization per se can control neurotransmitter release, in addition to its role in promoting Ca2+ influx. The 'Ca2+ hypothesis' has provided an essential framework for understanding how Ca2+ entry and accumulation in nerve terminals controls transmitter release. Yet, increases in intracellular Ca2+ levels alone cannot account for the initiation and termination of release; some additional mechanism is needed. Several experiments from various laboratories indicate that membrane potential has a decisive role in controlling this release. For example, depolarization causes release when Ca2+ entry is blocked and intracellular Ca2+ levels are held at an elevated level. The key molecules that link membrane potential with release control have not yet been identified: likely candidates are presynaptic autoreceptors and perhaps the Ca2+ channel itself.