Requirement of specific intrahelical interactions for stabilizing the inactive conformation of glycoprotein hormone receptors

Novel insights on thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor signal transduction

The TSH receptor (TSHR) is a member of the glycoprotein hormone receptors, a subfamily of family A G protein-coupled receptors. The TSHR is of great importance for the growth and function of the thyroid gland. The TSHR and its endogenous ligand TSH are pivotal proteins with respect to a variety of physiological functions and malfunctions. The molecular events of TSHR regulation can be summarized as a process of signal transduction, including signal reception, conversion, and amplification. The steps during signal transduction from the extra- to the intracellular sites of the cell are not yet comprehensively understood. However, essential new insights have been achieved in recent years on the interrelated mechanisms at the extracellular region, the transmembrane domain, and intracellular components. This review contains a critical summary of available knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of signal transduction at the TSHR, for example, the key amino acids involved in hormone binding or in the structural conformational changes that lead to G protein activation or signaling regulation. Aspects of TSHR oligomerization, signaling promiscuity, signaling selectivity, phenotypes of genetic variations, and potential extrathyroidal receptor activity are also considered, because these are relevant to an understanding of the overall function of the TSHR, including physiological, pathophysiological, and pharmacological perspectives. Directions for future research are discussed.

Asn441 plays a key role in folding and function of the Na+/I- symporter (NIS)

The Na(+)/I(-) symporter (NIS) is a plasma membrane glycoprotein that mediates active I(-) transport in the thyroid, the first step in the biosynthesis of the iodine-containing thyroid hormones T3 and T4. Several NIS mutants have been identified as a cause of congenital I(-) transport defect (ITD), and their investigation has yielded valuable mechanistic information on NIS. Here we report a thorough characterization of the ITD-causing NIS mutation in which the sixth intracellular loop residues 439-443 are missing. This mutant protein was intracellularly retained, incompletely glycosylated, and intrinsically inactive. Engineering 5 Ala at positions 439-443 partially recovered cell surface targeting and activity (∼15%). Strikingly, NIS with the sequence 439-AANAA-443, in which Asn was restored at position 441, was targeted to the plasma membrane and exhibited ∼95% the transport activity of WT NIS. Based on our NIS homology model, we propose that the side chain of N441, a residue conserved throughout most of the SLC5 family, interacts with the main chain amino group of G444, capping the α-helix of transmembrane segment XII and thus stabilizing the structure of the molecule. Our data provide insight into a critical interhelical interaction required for NIS folding and activity.

From molecular details of the interplay between transmembrane helices of the thyrotropin receptor to general aspects of signal transduction in family a G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)

Transmembrane helices (TMHs) 5 and 6 are known to be important for signal transduction by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Our aim was to characterize the interface between TMH5 and TMH6 of the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) to gain molecular insights into aspects of signal transduction and regulation. A proline at TMH5 position 5.50 is highly conserved in family A GPCRs and causes a twist in the helix structure. Mutation of the TSHR-specific alanine (Ala-593⁵·⁵⁰) at this position to proline resulted in a 20-fold reduction of cell surface expression. This indicates that TMH5 in the TSHR might have a conformation different from most other family A GPCRs by forming a regular α-helix. Furthermore, linking our own and previous data from directed mutagenesis with structural information led to suggestions of distinct pairs of interacting residues between TMH5 and TMH6 that are responsible for stabilizing either the basal or the active state. Our insights suggest that the inactive state conformation is constrained by a core set of polar interactions among TMHs 2, 3, 6, and 7 and in contrast that the active state conformation is stabilized mainly by non-polar interactions between TMHs 5 and 6. Our findings might be relevant for all family A GPCRs as supported by a statistical analysis of residue properties between the TMHs of a vast number of GPCR sequences.

Conserved amino acids participate in the structure networks deputed to intramolecular communication in the lutropin receptor

The luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) particularly susceptible to spontaneous pathogenic gain-of-function mutations. Protein structure network (PSN) analysis on wild-type LHR and two constitutively active mutants, combined with in vitro mutational analysis, served to identify key amino acids that are part of the regulatory network responsible for propagating communication between the extracellular and intracellular poles of the receptor. Highly conserved amino acids in the rhodopsin family GPCRs participate in the protein structural stability as network hubs in both the inactive and active states. Moreover, they behave as the most recurrent nodes in the communication paths between the extracellular and intracellular sides in both functional states with emphasis on the active one. In this respect, non-conservative loss-of-function mutations of these amino acids is expected to impair the most relevant way of communication between activating mutation sites or hormone-binding domain and G protein recognition regions.

Structural and functional changes in a synthetic S5 segment of KvLQT1 channel as a result of a conserved amino acid substitution that occurs in LQT1 syndrome of human

Mutations in various voltage gated cardiac ion channels are the cause of different forms of long QT syndrome (LQTS), which is an inherited arrhythmic disorder marked as a prolonged QT interval on electrocardiogram. Of these LQTS1 is associated with mutations in the gene encoding KCNQ1 (KvLQT1) channel. One responsible mutation, G269S, in the S5 segment of KvLQT1, that affects the proper expression and function of channel protein leads to LQTS1. Our objective was to study how G269S mutation interferes with the structure and function of a synthetic S5 segment of KvLQT1 channel. One wild type 22-residue peptide and another mutant peptide of the same length with G269S mutation, derived from the S5 segment were synthesized and labeled with fluorescent probes. The mutant peptide exhibited lower affinity towards phospholipid vesicles as compared to the wild type peptide and showed impaired assembly and localization onto the lipid vesicles as evidenced by membrane-binding, energy transfer and proteolytic cleavage experiments. Loss in the helical content of S5 mutant peptide in membrane-mimetic environments was observed. Furthermore, it was observed that G269S mutation significantly inhibited the ability of S5 peptide to permeabilize the lipid vesicles. The present studies show the basis of change in function of the selected S5 segment as a result of G269S mutation which is associated with LQT1 syndrome. We speculate that the structural and functional changes related to the glycine to serine amino acid substitution in the S5 segment may also influence the activity of the whole KvLQT1 channel.

Heterodimerization of hypothalamic G-protein-coupled receptors involved in weight regulation

BACKGROUND

Melanocortin 3 and 4 receptors (MC3R and MC4R) are known to play an essential role in hypothalamic weight regulation. In addition to these two G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a huge number of other GPCRs are expressed in hypothalamic regions, and some of them are involved in weight regulation. So far, homodimerization was shown for a few of these receptors. Heterodimerization of unrelated receptors may have profound functional consequence but heterodimerization of GPCRs involved in weight regulation was not reported yet.

METHODS

A selective number of hypothalamically expressed GPCRs were cloned into a eukaryotic expression vector. Cell surface expression was demonstrated by an ELISA approach. Subcellular distribution was investigated by confocal laser microscopy. A sandwich ELISA and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) were used to determine protein-protein interaction.

RESULTS

Via sandwich ELISA and FRET approach we could demonstrate a robust interaction of the MC4R with GPR7, both of which are expressed in the hypothalamic nucleus paraventricularis. Moreover, we determined a strong interaction of MC3R with the growth hormone secretagogue receptor expressed in the nucleus arcuatus.

CONCLUSION

Identification GPCR heterodimerization adds to the understanding of the complexity of weight regulation and may provide important information to develop therapeutic strategies to treat obesity.

Multiple facets of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor function

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a glycoprotein hormone produced by the anterior pituitary gland. This gonadotropin plays an essential role in reproduction. Its receptor (FSHR) belongs to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), specifically the family of rhodopsin-like receptors. Agonist binding to the FSHR triggers the rapid activation of multiple signaling cascades, mainly the cAMP-adenylyl cyclase-protein kinase A cascade, that impact diverse biological effects of FSH in the gonads. As in other G protein-coupled receptors, the several cytoplasmic domains of the FSHR are involved in signal transduction and termination of the FSH signal. Here we summarize some recent information on the signaling cascades activated by FSH as well as on the role of the intracytoplasmic domains of the FSHR in coupling to membrane and cytosolic proteins linked to key biological functions regulated by the FSH-FSHR system.

Amino acids in the COOH-terminal region of the oxytocin receptor third intracellular domain are important for receptor function

Previously, residue K6.30 in the COOH-terminal region of the third intracellular domain (3iC) of the oxytocin (OT) receptor (OTR) was identified as important for receptor function leading to phospholipase C activation in both OTR and the vasopressin V(2) receptor (V(2)R) chimera V(2)ROTR3iC. Substitution of either A6.28K or V6.30K in wild-type V(2)R did not recapitulate the increase in phosphatidylinositide (PI) turnover observed in V(2)ROTR3iC. Hence, the role of K6.30 may be context-specific. Deletion of two NH(2)-terminal OTR3iC segments in the V(2)ROTR3iC chimera did not diminish vasopressin-stimulated PI turnover, whereas deletion of RVSSVKL (residues 6.19-6.25) reduced receptor expression. Deletion of this sequence in wild-type OTR reduced expression by 50% without affecting affinity for [(3)H]OT. This OTR mutant was unable to activate PI turnover or extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation. The effects of alanine substitution for individual residues in RVSSVKL indicated differential importance for OTR function. The R6.19A substitution lost high-affinity sites for [(3)H]OT and the ability to stimulate PI turnover. Affinity for [(3)H]OT and membrane expression was not affected by any other substitutions. OTR-V6.20A and OTR-K6.24A mutants functioned as well as wild-type OTR, whereas OTR S6.21A, S6.22A, and V6.23A mutants exhibited impaired abilities to activate PI turnover (20-40% of OTR), and the OTR-L6.25A mutant exhibited constitutive activity. In conclusion, specific amino acids in the RVSSVKL segment in the COOH-terminal region of the third intracellular domain of OTR influence the ability of OTR to activate G protein-mediated actions.

Role of the intracellular domains of the human FSH receptor in G(alphaS) protein coupling and receptor expression

The human (h) follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) belongs to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This receptor consists of 695 amino acid residues and is preferentially coupled to the G(s) protein. This receptor is highly conserved among species (overall homology, 85%), with a 25-69% homology drop when compared to the human LH and TSH receptors. Although studies in prototypical rhodopsin/beta-adrenergic receptors suggest that multiple domains in the intracellular loops (iL) and the carboxyl-terminus (Ctail) of these receptors contribute to G protein coupling and receptor expression, there is a paucity of structure/function data on the role of these domains in FSHR function. Employing point mutations we have found that several residues present in the iL2 of the hFSHR are important for both coupling the receptor to the G(s) protein and maintaining the receptor molecule in an inactive conformation. In fact, HEK-293 cells expressing several hFSHR mutants with substitutions at R(450) (central to the highly conserved ERW triplet motif) and T(453) (a potential target for phosphorylation) failed to mediate ligand-provoked G(s) protein activation but not agonist binding, whereas substitutions at the hydrophobic L(460) (a conserved residue present in all glycoprotein hormone receptors) conferred elevated basal cAMP to the transfected cells. Thus, this particular loop apparently acts as a conformational switch for allowing the receptor to adopt an active conformation upon agonist stimulation. Residues in both ends of the iL3 are important for signal transduction in a number of GPCRs, including the FSHR. We have recently explored the importance of the reversed BBXXB motif (BXXBB; where B represents a basic residue and X a non-basic residue) present in the juxtamembrane region of the hFSHR iL3. A hFSHR mutant with all basic amino acids present in the iL3 BXXBB motif replaced by alanine failed to bind agonist and activate effector, and was expressed as an immature < or =62kDa form of the receptor. Individual substitutions of basic residues resulted in mutants that bound agonist normally but failed to activate effector when replaced at R(552) or R(556). Triple mutations in the same motif located in the NH(2)-end of the Ctail resulted in a complete inability of the receptor to bind agonist and activate effector, whereas individual substitutions resulted in decreased or virtually abolished agonist binding and cAMP accumulation, with both functions correlating with the detected levels of mature (80kDa) forms of the receptor. Thus, the BXXBB motif at the iL3 of the FSHR is essential for coupling the activated receptor to the G(s) protein, whereas the same motif in the Ctail is apparently more important for membrane expression. The role of cysteine residues present in the Ctail of the FSHR is an enigma since there are no conserved cysteines amongst LHR, FSHR and TSHR. C(629) and C(655) are conserved in the gonadotropin receptors but not in the TSHR. Alanine replacement of C(627) had no effect on hFSHR expression and function, whereas the same mutation at C(629) altered membrane expression and signal transduction. Serine or threonine substitutions of C(655) did not modify any of the parameters analyzed. In the hFSHR, C(629) may be a target for palmitoylation, and apparently it is the only cysteine residue in the Ctail domain that might play an important role in receptor function.

Trans-activation, cis-activation and signal selection of gonadotropin receptors

It has been thought that when a hormone binds to a receptor, the liganded receptor activates itself and generates hormone signals, such as the cAMP signal and the inositol phosphate signal (cis-activation). We describe that a liganded LH receptor or FSH receptor molecule is capable of intermolecularly activating nonliganded receptors (trans-activation). Particularly, intriguing is the possibility that a pair of compound heterozygous mutants, one defective in binding and the other defective in signaling, may cooperate and rescue signaling. Furthermore, trans-activation of the binding deficient receptors examined in our studies generates either the cAMP signal or the IP signal, but not both. Trans-activation and selective signal generation have broad implications on signal generation mechanisms, and suggest new therapeutic approaches.

Structural determinants for G-protein activation and specificity in the third intracellular loop of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor

The selectivity of G-protein recognition is determined by the intracellular loops (ICLs) of seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors. In a previous study, we have shown that the N-terminal and central portions of ICL2 from F525 to D530 participate in dual Galphas-/Galphaq-protein activation by the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR). ICL3 is another major determinant for G-protein activation. Therefore, the aim of our study was to identify important amino acids within ICL3 of the TSHR to gain insight in more detail about its specific function for Galphas- and Galphaq-protein activation and selectivity. Single-alanine substitutions of residues in the N-terminal, middle, and C-terminal region of ICL3 were generated. N-terminal residues Y605 and V608 and C-terminal positions K618, K621, and I622 were identified as selectively important for Galphaq activation, whereas mutations in the center of ICL3 had no effect on TSHR signaling. Our findings provide evidence for an amino acid pattern in the N- and C-terminal part of ICL3, which is involved in Galphaq-mediated signaling. Furthermore, molecular modeling of interaction of TSHR ICL2 and 3 with Galphaq suggests three potential contact sites: TSHR C-terminal ICL3 with beta5-6 loop of Galphaq, TSHR ICL2 residues I523-R531 with beta2-3 loop and N-terminal helix of Galphaq, and TSHR ICL2/transmembrane helix (TMH) 3+ICL3/TMH6 with C-terminal tail of Galphaq.

Functional significance of the BBXXB motif reversed present in the cytoplasmic domains of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor

The minimal structural motif, BBXXB (where B represents a basic amino acid residue and X a non-basic residue), located in particular regions of the intracellular domains of cell surface membrane receptors is involved in the G protein-activating activity of a number of G protein-coupled receptors. The human FSH receptor (hFSHR) exhibits a reversed BBXXB motif (BXXBB) in the juxtamembrane region of the third intracellular loop (IL3) and the carboxyl terminus (Ctail) of the receptor; however the importance of this sequence on receptor function remains unclear. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of mutations in this structural motif on hFSHR expression, receptor-mediated effector activation and agonist-provoked receptor internalization. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids containing the cDNA of the wild-type (Wt) hFSHR or several hFSHR mutants in which basic amino acids of the minimal structural motif at the IL3 and Ctail were replaced with alanine (i.e. AXXAA, AXXBB, BXXAB and BXXBA mutants). Alanine substitution of the three basic residues present in the IL3-BXXBB (IL3-AXXAA mutant) yielded a < or =60 kDa possibly under-glycosylated form of the FSHR, whereas the same substitutions in the Ctail resulted in the immature >62 kDa form of the receptor; both AXXAA hFSHR mutants completely failed to bind agonist and activate effector. Individual substitutions resulted in different cAMP responses to agonist stimulation: the IL3-AXXBB and IL3-BXXBA mutant hFSHRs failed to evoke Gs protein activation, whereas agonist-stimulated cAMP production was completely normal when the IL3-BXXAB mutant was expressed. All three IL3 mutants bound [125I]-labelled FSH in a similar fashion to the Wt hFSHR. Ligand-binding, cell surface membrane receptor expression and agonist-provoked effector activation were significantly affected by the individual substitutions at the Ctail-BXXBB motif: the Ctail-AXXBB variant exhibited reduced (approximately 50%) maximal cAMP response and ability to bind ligand, whereas both ligand binding and effector activation was severely reduced or abolished by expression of the Ctail-BXXBA and -BXXAB hFSHR mutants; the expression levels of the 80 kDa form of the receptor correlated with the magnitude of ligand-provoked cAMP production and binding capability of the mutant receptors. Upon stimulation by agonist, all mutants with detectable ligand-binding activity internalized following the pattern exhibited by the Wt hFSHR species. These results indicate that the BXXBB motif at the IL3 of the hFSHR is essential for coupling the activated receptor to the Gs protein, whereas the same motif in the Ctail is apparently more important for membrane expression.

Structure and topology of the transmembrane domain 4 of the divalent metal transporter in membrane-mimetic environments

The divalent metal transporter (DMT1) is a 12-transmembrane domain protein responsible for dietary iron uptake in the duodenum and iron acquisition from transferrin in peripheral tissues. The transmembrane domain 4 (TM4) of DMT1 has been shown to be crucial for its biological function. Here we report the 3D structure and topology of the DMT1-TM4 peptide by NMR spectroscopy with simulated annealing calculations in membrane-mimetic environments, e.g. 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol and SDS micelles. The 3D structures of the peptide are similar in both environments, with nonordered and flexible N- and C-termini flanking an ordered helical region. The final set of the 16 lowest energy structures is particularly well defined in the region of residues Leu9-Phe20 in 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, with a mean pairwise root mean square deviation of 0.23 +/- 0.10 A for the backbone heavy atoms and 0.82 +/- 0.17 A for all heavy atoms. In SDS micelles, the length of the helix is dependent on pH values. In particular, the C-terminus becomes well-structured at low pH (4.0), whereas the N-terminal segment (Arg1-Gly7) is flexible and poorly defined at all pH values studied. The effects of 12-doxylPtdCho spin-label and paramagnetic metal ions on NMR signal intensities demonstrated that both the N-terminus and helical region of the TM4 are embedded into the interior of SDS micelles. Unexpectedly, we observed that amide protons exchanged much faster in SDS than in 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, indicating that there is possible solvent accessibility in the structure. The paramagnetic metal ions broaden NMR signals from residues both situated in aqueous phase and in the helical region. From these results we speculate that DMT1-TM4s may self-assemble to form a channel through which metal ions are likely to be transported. These results might provide an insight into the structure-function relationship for the integral DMT1.

Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor and its role in Graves' disease

The thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH, or thyrotropin) receptor (TSHR) mediates the activating action of TSH to the thyroid gland, resulting in the growth and proliferation of thyrocytes and thyroid hormone production. In Graves' disease, thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies can mimic TSH action and stimulate thyroid cells. This leads to hyperthyroidism and abnormal overproduction of thyroid hormone. TSHR-antibodies-binding epitopes on the receptor molecule are well studied. Mechanism of TSHR-autoantibodies production is more or less clear but a susceptibility gene, which is linked to their production, is still unknown. Genetic studies show no linkage between the TSHR gene and Graves' disease. Among three common polymorphisms in the TSHR gene, only the D727E germline polymorphism in the cytoplasmic tail of the receptor showed an association with the disease, and this association is weak. The absence of a strong genetic effect of the TSHR polymorphisms in such a common and complex disorder as Graves' disease may be explained by a high degree of evolutionary conservation in TSHR. This can be shown by naturally existing germline and somatic mutations in the TSHR gene that cause various types of nonautoimmune and hereditary thyroid disease.

Membrane-inserted conformation of transmembrane domain 4 of divalent-metal transporter

Divalent-metal transporter 1 (DMT1) is involved in the intestinal iron absorption and in iron transport in the transferrin cycle. It transports metal ions at low pH ( approximately 5.5), but not at high pH (7.4), and the transport is a proton-coupled process. Previously it has been shown that transmembrane domain 4 (TM4) is crucial for the function of this protein. Here we provide the first direct experimental evidence for secondary-structural features and membrane insertions of a 24-residue peptide, corresponding to TM4 of DMT1 (DMTI-TM4), in various membrane-mimicking environments by the combined use of CD and NMR spectroscopies. The peptide mainly adopts an alpha-helical structure in trifluoroethanol, SDS and dodecylphosphocholine micelles, and dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine and dimyristoyl phosphatidylglycerol small unilamellar vesicles. It has been demonstrated from both Halpha secondary shifts and nuclear-Overhauser-enhancement (NOE) connectivities that the peptide is well folded into an alpha-helix from Val(8) to Lys(23) in SDS micelles at pH 4.0, whereas the N-terminus is highly flexible. The alpha-helical content estimated from NMR data is in agreement with that extracted from CD simulations. The highest helicity was observed in the anionic phospholipids [1,2-dimyristoyl- sn -glycero-3-[phospho-rac -(1-glycerol)]], indicating that electrostatic attraction is important for peptide binding and insertion into the membranes. The secondary-structural transition of the peptide occurred at pH 4.3 in the 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) water mixed solvent, whereas at a higher pH value (5.6) in SDS micelles, DMT1-TM4 exhibited a more stable structure in SDS micelles than that in TFE in terms of changing the pH and temperature. PAGE did not show high-molecular-mass aggregates in SDS micelles. The position of the peptide relative to SDS micelles was probed by the effects of 5- and 16-doxylstearic acids on the intensities of the peptide proton resonances. The results showed that the majority of the peptide is inserted into the hydrophobic interior of SDS micelles, whereas the C-terminal residues are surface-exposed. The ability of DMT1-TM4 to assume transmembrane features may be crucial for its biological function in vivo.

Allosteric activation of plasma membrane receptors--physiological implications and structural origins

Allosteric modulation of receptors has physiological not just pharmacological significance. Thus, the chemical context in which an agonist signal is received can have a major impact on the nature of the physiological response by modifying receptor sensitivity and/or maximal activity-even the nature of the signalling response. In addition, recognising that an endogenous activator is the allosteric modulator of a known receptor, rather than the agonist of a novel receptor, has the potential to solve, in dramatic fashion, key physiological questions. What is an allosteric modulator and why are allosteric effects on receptors so diverse and frequently complex? What is the scope of allosteric effects? Can the existence of endogenous modulators be predicted from a receptor's amino acid sequence? How should screening for endogenous allosteric modulators be undertaken? These questions form the framework of this mini-review on physiological and structural aspects of receptor allostery.

The crystallographic model of rhodopsin and its use in studies of other G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins that respond to environmental signals and initiate signal transduction pathways activating cellular processes. Rhodopsin is a GPCR found in rod cells in retina where it functions as a photopigment. Its molecular structure is known from cryo-electron microscopic and X-ray crystallographic studies, and this has reshaped many structure/function questions important in vision science. In addition, this first GPCR structure has provided a structural template for studies of other GPCRs, including many known drug targets. After presenting an overview of the major structural elements of rhodopsin, recent literature covering the use of the rhodopsin structure in analyzing other GPCRs will be summarized. Use of the rhodopsin structural model to understand the structure and function of other GPCRs provides strong evidence validating the structural model.

Structural requirements for mutational lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor activation

Different activation mechanisms of glycoprotein hormone receptors, which are members of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily, have been proposed. For example, the large ectodomain of glycoprotein hormone receptors may function as an inverse agonist keeping the transmembrane domain in an inactive conformation. To provide support for this hypothesis, we have generated different lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHR) constructs lacking the ectodomain. Although some ectodomain-deficient LHR constructs were targeted to the cell surface, cAMP levels remained unchanged under basal conditions and agonist application but could be increased by a mutation within the transmembrane domain 6 (D578H). Taking advantage of a constitutive activating mutation (S277N) located in the extracellular domain, we showed that the intact leucine-rich repeat-containing ectodomain is essential for constitutive activation of the LHR by mutation of the hinge region. Our findings support an activation scenario in which agonist binding or mutational alterations expose a structure within the ectodomain, which then activates the transmembrane core.

A model for constitutive lutropin receptor activation based on molecular simulation and engineered mutations in transmembrane helices 6 and 7

Many naturally occurring and engineered mutations lead to constitutive activation of the G protein-coupled lutropin receptor (LHR), some of which also result in reduced ligand responsiveness. To elucidate the nature of interhelical interactions in this heptahelical receptor and changes thereof accompanying activation, we have utilized site-directed mutagenesis on transmembrane helices 6 and 7 of rat LHR to prepare and characterize a number of single, double, and triple mutants. The potent constitutively activating mutants, D556(6.44)H and D556(6.44)Q, were combined with weaker activating mutants, N593(7.45)R and N597(7.49)Q, and the loss-of-responsiveness mutant, N593(7.45)A. The engineered mutants have also been simulated using a new receptor model based on the crystal structure of rhodopsin. The results suggest that constitutive LHR activation by mutations at Asp-556(6.44) is triggered by the breakage or weakening of the interaction found in the wild type receptor between Asp-556(6.44) and Asn-593(7.45). Whereas this perturbation is unique to the activating mutations at Asp-556(6.44), common features to all of the most active LHR mutants are the breakage of the charge-reinforced H-bonding interaction between Arg-442(3.50) and Asp-542(6.30) and the increase in solvent accessibility of the cytosolic extensions of helices 3 and 6, which probably participate in the receptor-G protein interface. Asn-593(7.45) and Asn-597(7.49) also seem to be necessary for the high constitutive activities of D556(6.44)H and D556(6.44)Q and for full ligand responsiveness. The new theoretical model provides a foundation for further experimental work on the molecular mechanism(s) of receptor activation.

ARF6: a newly appreciated player in G protein-coupled receptor desensitization

The luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin hormone receptor (LH/CG R) signals to regulate ovulation, corpus luteum formation, and fetal survival during pregnancy. Agonist binding to the LH/CG R is poorly reversible, emphasizing the importance of a cellular mechanism to temper signaling by a potentially persistently active receptor. Like other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), signaling by this receptor is modulated by its binding of an arrestin. We have identified ADP ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) as a protein whose activation state is regulated by the LH/CG R and which functions to regulate the availability of plasma membrane-docked arrestin 2 to this receptor. We hypothesize that ARF6 might also serve GPCRs other than the LH/CG R to regulate the availability of arrestin 2 for receptor desensitization.

Aspartic acid 564 in the third cytoplasmic loop of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor is crucial for phosphorylation-independent interaction with arrestin2

Arrestin2 binding to the active but unphosphorylated luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LH/CG R) in ovarian follicles is triggered by activation of ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) and leads to uncoupling of this receptor from cAMP signaling. We sought to determine how arrestin2 binds to LH/CG R, if binding is of high affinity, and if the receptor also binds arrestin3. Desensitization of intact LH/CG R was equally sensitive to ectopic constructs of arrestin2 that bind other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) either in a phosphorylation-independent or -dependent manner. Intact LH/CG R was not desensitized by ectopic arrestin3 constructs. Surface plasmon resonance studies showed that arrestin2 bound a synthetic third intracellular (3i) LH/CG R loop peptide with picomolar affinity; arrestin3 bound with millimolar affinity. To determine whether Asp-564 in the 3i loop mimicked the phosphorylated residue of other GPCRs, human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells were transfected with wild-type (WT) and D564G LH/CG R. An agonist-stimulated ARF6-dependent arrestin2 undocking pathway to drive desensitization of WT receptor was recapitulated in HEK cell membranes, and ectopic arrestin2 promoted desensitization of WT LH/CG R. However, D564G LH/CG R in HEK cells was not desensitized, and synthetic 3i D564G peptide did not bind arrestin2. Synthetic 3i loop peptides containing D564E, D564V, or D564N also did not bind arrestin2. We conclude that the ARF6-mediated mechanism to release a pool of membrane-delimited arrestin to bind GPCRs may be a widespread mechanism to deliver arrestin to GPCRs for receptor desensitization. Unlike other GPCRs that additionally require receptor phosphorylation, LH/CG R activation is sufficient to expose a conformation in which Asp-564 in the 3i loop confers high affinity binding selectively to arrestin2.

Activation of guanosine 5'-[gamma-(35)S]thio-triphosphate binding through M(1) muscarinic receptors in transfected Chinese Hamster ovary cell membranes: 2. Testing the "two-states" model of receptor activation

I suggested in the accompanying article [Mol Pharmacol 2001;59:875-885] that muscarinic receptors catalyzed G protein activation. Acetylcholine or carbamylcholine recognition facilitated not only the GDP release from receptor-coupled inactive G proteins but also the release of G from the (unstable) HRG complex. The two effects facilitated [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the presence of GDP, but could be studied separately by comparing [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the absence and presence of GTP. Guanyl nucleotides affected the efficiency of receptor-G protein coupling. The relative efficacies of partial agonists in the absence and presence of GTP should remain nonlinearly correlated if all agonists stabilize (to different extents) the same active receptor conformation. The correlation between M(1) muscarinic agonists' efficacy in accelerating [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the absence of other nucleotides and their in vivo efficacy (inositol phosphate accumulation) was in fact very poor. This probably reflected the presence of GTP in intact cells: pertussis toxin pretreatment (which inactivates the G(i/o) proteins) did not affect the agonists' efficacy profile (evaluated in the absence of spare receptors), but the addition of GTP to the [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding medium did. These results did not support the allosteric "two states" model of receptor activation, but suggested that different agonists induced different receptor conformations ("induced fit").