Depupylase Dop Requires Inorganic Phosphate in the Active Site for Catalysis

Mapping the structural heterogeneity of Pup ligase PafA using H/D exchange mass spectrometry

The Pup-proteasome system (PPS) is a unique bacterial proteolytic pathway found in some bacterial species, including in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, that plays a vital role in maintaining proteome integrity and survival during infection. Pupylation is the process of tagging substrates with Pup for degradation and is catalyzed by PafA, the sole Pup ligase in bacteria. However, how PafA interacts with diverse targets and its oligomeric state remains poorly understood. Although X-ray crystal structures have characterized PafA as a domain-swapped dimer, it is widely regarded as functionally active in its monomeric form. It remains to be established whether PafA dimerizes in solution, and how dimerization influences its function. In this study, we employed hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) alongside complementary biophysical techniques to explore the oligomeric states and conformational dynamics of PafA. We show that recombinantly-produced PafA exists in a monomeric and a domain-swapped dimeric state in solution. Although nucleotide binding stabilizes PafAdimer, it primarily adopts a catalytically inactive conformation. Our HDX-MS highlighted regions throughout the N- and C-terminal domains that facilitate the PafA dimerization process. HDX-MS also revealed nucleotide binding induces global conformational changes on PafAmonomer, underscoring the structural plasticity of this promiscuous enzyme. Our findings enhance our understanding of the structural and conformational heterogeneity of PafA and demonstrate how nucleotide binding and dimerization may influence its function.

Identification of a depupylation regulator for an essential enzyme in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

In Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), proteins that are posttranslationally modified with a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) can be degraded by bacterial proteasomes. A single Pup-ligase and depupylase shape the pupylome, but the mechanisms regulating their substrate specificity are incompletely understood. Here, we identified a depupylation regulator, a protein called CoaX, through its copurification with the depupylase Dop. CoaX is a pseudopantothenate kinase that showed evidence of binding to pantothenate, an essential nutrient Mtb synthesizes, but not its phosphorylation. In a ∆coaX mutant, pantothenate synthesis enzymes including PanB, a substrate of the Pup-proteasome system (PPS), were more abundant than in the parental strain. In vitro, CoaX specifically accelerated depupylation of Pup~PanB, while addition of pantothenate inhibited this reaction. In culture, media supplementation with pantothenate decreased PanB levels, which required CoaX. Collectively, we propose CoaX regulates PanB abundance in response to pantothenate levels by modulating its vulnerability to proteolysis by Mtb proteasomes.

Identification of a proteolysis regulator for an essential enzyme in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

In Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins that are post-translationally modified with Pup, a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein, can be degraded by proteasomes. While pupylation is reversible, mechanisms regulating substrate specificity have not been identified. Here, we identify the first depupylation regulators: CoaX, a pseudokinase, and pantothenate, an essential, central metabolite. In a Δ coaX mutant, pantothenate synthesis enzymes were more abundant, including PanB, a substrate of the Pup-proteasome system. Media supplementation with pantothenate decreased PanB levels in a coaX and Pup-proteasome-dependent manner. In vitro , CoaX accelerated depupylation of Pup∼PanB, while addition of pantothenate inhibited this reaction. Collectively, we propose CoaX contributes to proteasomal degradation of PanB by modulating depupylation of Pup∼PanB in response to pantothenate levels.

One Sentence Summary

A pseudo-pantothenate kinase regulates proteasomal degradation of a pantothenate synthesis enzyme in M. tuberculosis .

Electrostatic interactions guide substrate recognition of the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein ligase PafA

Pupylation, a post-translational modification found in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other Actinobacteria, involves the covalent attachment of prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) to lysines on target proteins by the ligase PafA (proteasome accessory factor A). Pupylated proteins, like ubiquitinated proteins in eukaryotes, are recruited for proteasomal degradation. Proteomic studies suggest that hundreds of potential pupylation targets are modified by the sole existing ligase PafA. This raises intriguing questions regarding the selectivity of this enzyme towards a diverse range of substrates. Here, we show that the availability of surface lysines alone is not sufficient for interaction between PafA and target proteins. By identifying the interacting residues at the pupylation site, we demonstrate that PafA recognizes authentic substrates via a structural recognition motif centered around exposed lysines. Through a combination of computational analysis, examination of available structures and pupylated proteomes, and biochemical experiments, we elucidate the mechanism by which PafA achieves recognition of a wide array of substrates while retaining selective protein turnover.

A conserved loop sequence of the proteasome system depupylase Dop regulates substrate selectivity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Mycobacteria use a proteasome system that is similar to a eukaryotic proteasome but do not use ubiquitin to target proteins for degradation. Instead, mycobacteria encode a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) that posttranslationally modifies proteins to mark them for proteolysis. Pupylation occurs on lysines of targeted proteins and is catalyzed by the ligase PafA. Like ubiquitylation, pupylation can be reversed by the depupylase Dop, which shares high structural similarity with PafA. Unique to Dop near its active site is a disordered loop of approximately 40 amino acids that is highly conserved among diverse dop-containing bacterial genera. To understand the function of this domain, we deleted discrete sequences from the Dop loop and assessed pupylation in mutant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We determined that various Dop loop mutations resulted in altered pupylome profiles, in particular when mutant dop alleles were overexpressed. Taken together, our data suggest these conserved amino acids play a role in substrate selectivity for Dop.

Structures of prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein Pup in complex with depupylase Dop reveal the mechanism of catalytic phosphate formation

Pupylation is the post-translational modification of lysine side chains with prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) that targets proteins for proteasomal degradation in mycobacteria and other members of Actinobacteria. Pup ligase PafA and depupylase Dop are the two enzymes acting in this pathway. Although they share close structural and sequence homology indicative of a common evolutionary origin, they catalyze opposing reactions. Here, we report a series of high-resolution crystal structures of Dop in different functional states along the reaction pathway, including Pup-bound states in distinct conformations. In combination with biochemical analysis, the structures explain the role of the C-terminal residue of Pup in ATP hydrolysis, the process that generates the catalytic phosphate in the active site, and suggest a role for the Dop-loop as an allosteric sensor for Pup-binding and ATP cleavage.

Pupylation is a bacterial post-translational protein modification, where the small ubiquitin-like protein Pup is covalently attached to lysine side chains of target proteins, which is a reversible process and depupylation is catalysed by the depupylase enzyme, Dop. Here, the authors present crystal structures of Dop in different functional states, which together with biochemical experiments provide insights into the catalytic mechanism of this enzyme.

Development of Tyrphostin Analogues to Study Inhibition of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pup Proteasome System*

Tuberculosis is a global health problem caused by infection with the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) bacteria. Although antibiotic treatment has dramatically reduced the impact of tuberculosis on the population, the existence and spreading of drug resistant strains urgently demands the development of new drugs that target Mtb in a different manner than currently used antibiotics. The prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) proteasome system is an attractive target for new drug development as it is unique to Mtb and related bacterial genera. Using a Pup-based fluorogenic substrate, we screened for inhibitors of Dop, the Mtb depupylating protease, and identified I-OMe-Tyrphostin AG538 (1) and Tyrphostin AG538 (2). The hits were validated and determined to be fast-reversible, non-ATP competitive inhibitors. We synthesized >25 analogs of 1 and 2 and show that several of the synthesized compounds also inhibit the depupylation actions of Dop on native substrate, FabD-Pup. Importantly, the pupylation activity of PafA, the sole Pup ligase in Mtb, was also inhibited by some of these compounds.

Exploring Protein Space: From Hydrolase to Ligase by Substitution

The understanding of how proteins evolve to perform novel functions has long been sought by biologists. In this regard, two homologous bacterial enzymes, PafA and Dop, pose an insightful case study, as both rely on similar mechanistic properties, yet catalyze different reactions. PafA conjugates a small protein tag to target proteins, whereas Dop removes the tag by hydrolysis. Given that both enzymes present a similar fold and high sequence similarity, we sought to identify the differences in the amino acid sequence and folding responsible for each distinct activity. We tackled this question using analysis of sequence–function relationships, and identified a set of uniquely conserved residues in each enzyme. Reciprocal mutagenesis of the hydrolase, Dop, completely abolished the native activity, at the same time yielding a catalytically active ligase. Based on the available Dop and PafA crystal structures, this change of activity required a conformational change of a critical loop at the vicinity of the active site. We identified the conserved positions essential for stabilization of the alternative loop conformation, and tracked alternative mutational pathways that lead to a change in activity. Remarkably, all these pathways were combined in the evolution of PafA and Dop, despite their redundant effect on activity. Overall, we identified the residues and structural elements in PafA and Dop responsible for their activity differences. This analysis delineated, in molecular terms, the changes required for the emergence of a new catalytic function from a preexisting one.

Survival in Hostile Conditions: Pupylation and the Proteasome in Actinobacterial Stress Response Pathways

Bacteria employ a multitude of strategies to cope with the challenges they face in their natural surroundings, be it as pathogens, commensals or free-living species in rapidly changing environments like soil. Mycobacteria and other Actinobacteria acquired proteasomal genes and evolved a post-translational, ubiquitin-like modification pathway called pupylation to support their survival under rapidly changing conditions and under stress. The proteasomal 20S core particle (20S CP) interacts with ring-shaped activators like the hexameric ATPase Mpa that recruits pupylated substrates. The proteasomal subunits, Mpa and pupylation enzymes are encoded in the so-called Pup-proteasome system (PPS) gene locus. Genes in this locus become vital for bacteria to survive during periods of stress. In the successful human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the 20S CP is essential for survival in host macrophages. Other members of the PPS and proteasomal interactors are crucial for cellular homeostasis, for example during the DNA damage response, iron and copper regulation, and heat shock. The multiple pathways that the proteasome is involved in during different stress responses suggest that the PPS plays a vital role in bacterial protein quality control and adaptation to diverse challenging environments.

Inter- and intramolecular regulation of protein depupylation in Mycobacterium smegmatis

Whereas intracellular proteolysis is essential for proper cellular function, it is a destructive process, which must be tightly regulated. In some bacteria, a Pup-proteasome system tags target proteins for degradation by a bacterial proteasome. Pup, a small modifier protein, is attached to target proteins by PafA, the sole Pup ligase, in a process termed pupylation. In mycobacteria, including Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pup undergoes a deamidation step by the enzyme Dop prior to its PafA-mediated attachment to a target. The catalytic mechanism of Pup deamidation is also used by Dop to perform depupylation, namely the removal of Pup from already tagged proteins. Hence, Dop appears to play contradictory roles: On the one hand, deamidation of Pup promotes pupylation, while on the other hand, depupylation reduces tagged protein levels. To avoid futile pupylation-depupylation cycles, Dop activity must be regulated. An intramolecular regulatory mechanism directs Dop to catalyze deamidation more effectively than depupylation. A complementary intermolecular mechanism results in Dop depletion under conditions where protein pupylation and degradation are favorable. In this work, we studied these regulatory mechanisms and identified a flexible loop in Dop, previously termed the Dop-loop, that acts as an intramolecular regulatory element that allosterically controls substrate preference. To investigate regulation at the intermolecular level, we used the CRISPR interference system to knock down the expression of M. smegmatis ATP-dependent intracellular proteases and found that the ClpCP protease is responsible for Dop depletion under starvation conditions. These findings clarify previous observations and introduce a new level for the regulation of Dop activity. DATABASE: Structural data are available in the PDB database under the accession numbers 4BJR and 4B0S.

Off to a slow start: Analyzing lag phases and accelerating rates in steady-state enzyme kinetics

Steady-state enzyme kinetics typically relies on the measurement of 'initial rates', obtained when the substrate is not significantly consumed and the amount of product formed is negligible. Although initial rates are usually faster than those measured later in the reaction time-course, sometimes the speed of the reaction appears instead to increase with time, reaching a steady level only after an initial delay or 'lag phase'. This behavior needs to be interpreted by the experimentalists. To assist interpretation, this article analyzes the many reasons why, during an enzyme assay, the observed rate can be slow in the beginning and then progressively accelerate. The possible causes range from trivial artifacts to instances in which deeper mechanistic or biophysical factors are at play. We provide practical examples for most of these causes, based firstly on experiments conducted with ornithine δ-aminotransferase and with other pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzymes that have been studied in our laboratory. On the side to this survey, we provide evidence that the product of the ornithine δ-aminotransferase reaction, glutamate 5-semialdehyde, cyclizes spontaneously to pyrroline 5-carboxylate with a rate constant greater than 3 s^-1.

Protein post-translational modifications in bacteria

Over the past decade the number and variety of protein post-translational modifications that have been detected and characterized in bacteria have rapidly increased. Most post-translational protein modifications occur in a relatively low number of bacterial proteins in comparison with eukaryotic proteins, and most of the modified proteins carry low, substoichiometric levels of modification; therefore, their structural and functional analysis is particularly challenging. The number of modifying enzymes differs greatly among bacterial species, and the extent of the modified proteome strongly depends on environmental conditions. Nevertheless, evidence is rapidly accumulating that protein post-translational modifications have vital roles in various cellular processes such as protein synthesis and turnover, nitrogen metabolism, the cell cycle, dormancy, sporulation, spore germination, persistence and virulence. Further research of protein post-translational modifications will fill current gaps in the understanding of bacterial physiology and open new avenues for treatment of infectious diseases.

Pupylated proteins are subject to broad proteasomal degradation specificity and differential depupylation

In actinobacteria, post-translational modification of proteins with prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein Pup targets them for degradation by a bacterial proteasome assembly consisting of the 20S core particle (CP) and the mycobacterial proteasomal ATPase (Mpa). Modification of hundreds of cellular proteins with Pup at specific surface lysines is carried out by a single Pup-ligase (PafA, proteasome accessory factor A). Pupylated substrates are recruited to the degradative pathway by binding of Pup to the N-terminal coiled-coil domains of Mpa. Alternatively, pupylation can be reversed by the enzyme Dop (deamidase of Pup). Although pupylated substrates outcompete free Pup in proteasomal degradation, potential discrimination of the degradation complex between the various pupylated substrates has not been investigated. Here we show that Mpa binds stably to an open-gate variant of the proteasome (oCP) and associates with bona fide substrates with highly similar affinities. The proteasomal degradation of substrates differing in size, structure and assembly state was recorded in real-time, showing that the pupylated substrates are processed by the Mpa-oCP complex with comparable kinetic parameters. Furthermore, the members of a complex, pupylated proteome (pupylome) purified from Mycobacterium smegmatis are degraded evenly as followed by western blotting. In contrast, analysis of the depupylation behavior of several pupylome members suggests substrate-specific differences in enzymatic turnover, leading to the conclusion that largely indiscriminate degradation competes with differentiated depupylation to control the ultimate fate of pupylated substrates.

Proteasome accessory factor A (PafA) transferase activity makes sense in the light of its homology with glutamine synthetase

The Pup-proteasome system (PPS) is a prokaryotic tagging and degradation system analogous in function to the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Like ubiquitin, Pup is conjugated to proteins, tagging them for proteasomal degradation. However, in the PPS, a single Pup-ligase, PafA, conjugates Pup to a wide variety of proteins. PafA couples ATP hydrolysis to formation of an isopeptide bond between Pup and a protein lysine via a mechanism similar to that used by glutamine synthetase (GS) to generate glutamine from ammonia and glutamate. GS can also transfer the glutamyl moiety from glutamine to a hydroxyl amine in an ATP-independent manner. Recently, the ability of PafA to transfer Pup from one protein to another was demonstrated. Here, we report that such PafA activity mechanistically resembles the transferase activity of GS. Both PafA and GS transferase activities are ATP-independent and proceed in two catalytic steps. In the first step catalyzed by PafA, an inorganic phosphate is used by the enzyme to depupylate a Pup donor, while forming an acyl phosphate Pup intermediate. The second step consists of Pup conjugation to the new protein, alongside the release of an inorganic phosphate. Detailed experimental analysis, combined with kinetic modeling of PafA transferase activity, allowed us to correctly predict the kinetics and magnitude of Pup transfer between two targets, and analyze the effects of their affinity to PafA on the efficiency of transfer. By deciphering the mechanism of the PafA transferase reaction in kinetic detail, this work provides in-depth mechanistic understanding of PafA, a key PPS enzyme.

How to control an intracellular proteolytic system: Coordinated regulatory switches in the mycobacterial Pup-proteasome system

Intracellular proteolysis is critical for the proper functioning of all cells, owing to its involvement in a wide range of processes. Because of the destructive nature of protein degradation, intracellular proteolysis is restricted by control mechanisms at almost every step of the proteolytic process. Understanding the coordination of such mechanisms is a challenging task, especially in systems as complex as the eukaryotic ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). In comparison, the bacterial analog of the UPS, the Pup-proteasome system (PPS) is much simpler and, therefore, allows for insight into the control of a proteolytic system. This review integrates available information to present a coherent picture of what is known of PPS regulatory switches and describes how these switches act in concert to enforce regulation at the system level. Finally, open questions regarding PPS regulation are discussed, providing readers with a sense of what lies ahead in the field.

Targets of ubiquitin like system in mycobacteria and related actinobacterial species

Protein turnover and recycling is a prerequisite in all living organisms to maintain normal cellular physiology. Many bacteria are proteasome deficient but they possess typical protease enzymes for carrying out protein turnover. However, several groups of actinobacteria such as mycobacteria harbor both proteasome and proteases. In these bacteria, for cellular protein turnover the target proteins undergo post-translational modification referred as pupylation in which a small protein Pup (prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein) is tagged to the specific lysine residues of the target proteins and after that those target proteins undergo proteasomal degradation. Thus, Pup serves as a degradation signal, helps in directing proteins toward the bacterial proteasome for a turnover. Although the Pup-proteasome system has a multifaceted role in environmental stresses, pathogenicity and regulation of cellular signaling, but the fate of all types of pupylation such as mono and polypupylation on the proteins is still not completely understood. In this review, we present the mechanisms involved in the activation and conjugation of Pup to the target proteins, describing the structural sketch of pupylation and fundamental differences between the eukaryotic ubiquitin-proteasome and bacterial Pup-proteasome systems. We are also presenting a concise classification and cataloging of the complete battery of experimentally identified Pup-substrates from various species of actinobacteria.

Prokaryotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein and Its Ligase/Deligase Enyzmes

Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) and the modification enzymes involved in attaching Pup to or removing it from target proteins present a fascinating example of convergent evolution with respect to eukaryotic ubiquitination. Like ubiquitin (Ub), Pup is a small protein that can be covalently attached to lysine side chains of cellular proteins, and like Ub, it can serve to recruit tagged proteins for proteasomal degradation. However, unlike Ub, Pup is conformationally highly dynamic, exhibits a different linkage connectivity to its target lysines, and its ligase belongs to a different class of enzymes than the E1/E2/E3 cascade of ubiquitination. A specific feature of actinobacteria (aside from sporadic cases in a few other lineages), pupylation appears to have evolved to provide an advantage to the bacteria under certain environmental stresses rather than act as a constitutive modification. For Mycobacterium tuberculosis, pupylation and the recruitment of pupylated substrates to the proteasome support persistence inside host macrophages during pathogenesis, rendering the Pup-proteasome system an attractive drug target. In this review, we consider the dynamic nature of Pup in relation to its function, discuss the reaction mechanisms of ligation to substrates and cleavage from pupylated substrates, and put them in context of the evolutionary history of this post-translational modification.