Tandem UAA repeats at the 3'-end of the transcript are essential for the precise initiation of reverse transcription of the I factor in Drosophila melanogaster

The function of twister ribozyme variants in non-LTR retrotransposition in Schistosoma mansoni

The twister ribozyme is widely distributed over numerous organisms and is especially abundant in Schistosoma mansoni, but has no confirmed biological function. Of the 17 non-LTR retrotransposons known in S. mansoni, none have thus far been associated with ribozymes. Here we report the identification of novel twister variant (T-variant) ribozymes and their function in S. mansoni non-LTR retrotransposition. We show that T-variant ribozymes are located at the 5′ end of Perere-3 non-LTR retrotransposons in the S. mansoni genome. T-variant ribozymes were demonstrated to be catalytically active in vitro. In reporter constructs, T-variants were shown to cleave in vivo, and cleavage of T-variants was sufficient for the translation of downstream reporter genes. Our analysis shows that the T-variants and Perere-3 are transcribed together. Target site duplications (TSDs); markers of target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) and footmarks of retrotransposition, are located adjacent to the T-variant cleavage site and suggest that T-variant cleavage has taken place inS. mansoni. Sequence heterogeneity in the TSDs indicates that Perere-3 retrotransposition is not site-specific. The TSD sequences contribute to the 5′ end of the terminal ribozyme helix (P1 stem). Based on these results we conclude that T-variants have a functional role in Perere-3 retrotransposition.

A benchmark and an algorithm for detecting germline transposon insertions and measuring de novo transposon insertion frequencies

Transposons are genomic parasites, and their new insertions can cause instability and spur the evolution of their host genomes. Rapid accumulation of short-read whole-genome sequencing data provides a great opportunity for studying new transposon insertions and their impacts on the host genome. Although many algorithms are available for detecting transposon insertions, the task remains challenging and existing tools are not designed for identifying de novo insertions. Here, we present a new benchmark fly dataset based on PacBio long-read sequencing and a new method TEMP2 for detecting germline insertions and measuring de novo ‘singleton’ insertion frequencies in eukaryotic genomes. TEMP2 achieves high sensitivity and precision for detecting germline insertions when compared with existing tools using both simulated data in fly and experimental data in fly and human. Furthermore, TEMP2 can accurately assess the frequencies of de novo transposon insertions even with high levels of chimeric reads in simulated datasets; such chimeric reads often occur during the construction of short-read sequencing libraries. By applying TEMP2 to published data on hybrid dysgenic flies inflicted by de-repressed P-elements, we confirmed the continuous new insertions of P-elements in dysgenic offspring before they regain piRNAs for P-element repression. TEMP2 is freely available at Github: https://github.com/weng-lab/TEMP2.

Both the Exact Target Site Sequence and a Long Poly(A) Tail Are Required for Precise Insertion of the 18S Ribosomal DNA-Specific Non-Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposon R7Ag

Ribosomal elements (R elements) are site-specific non-long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons that target ribosomal DNA (rDNA). To elucidate how R elements specifically access their target sites, we isolated and characterized the 18S rDNA-specific R element R7Ag from Anopheles gambiae Using an in vivo and ex vivo recombinant baculovirus retrotransposition system, we found that the exact host 18S rDNA sequence at the target site is essential for the precise insertion of R7Ag. In addition, a long poly(A) tail is necessary for the accurate initiation of R7Ag reverse transcription, a novel mechanism found in non-LTR elements. We further compared the subcellular localizations of proteins in R7Ag as well as R1Bm, another R element that targets 28S rDNA. Although the open reading frame 1 proteins (ORF1ps) of both R7Ag and R1Bm localized predominantly in the cytoplasm, ORF2 proteins (ORF2ps) colocalized in the nucleus with the nucleolar marker fibrillarin. The ORF1ps and ORF2ps of both R elements colocalized largely in the nuclear periphery and to a lesser extent within the nucleus. These results suggest that R7Ag and R1Bm proteins may access nucleolar rDNA targets in an ORF2p-dependent manner.

RNA-Mediated Gene Duplication and Retroposons: Retrogenes, LINEs, SINEs, and Sequence Specificity

A substantial number of “retrogenes” that are derived from the mRNA of various intron-containing genes have been reported. A class of mammalian retroposons, long interspersed element-1 (LINE1, L1), has been shown to be involved in the reverse transcription of retrogenes (or processed pseudogenes) and non-autonomous short interspersed elements (SINEs). The 3′-end sequences of various SINEs originated from a corresponding LINE. As the 3′-untranslated regions of several LINEs are essential for retroposition, these LINEs presumably require “stringent” recognition of the 3′-end sequence of the RNA template. However, the 3′-ends of mammalian L1s do not exhibit any similarity to SINEs, except for the presence of 3′-poly(A) repeats. Since the 3′-poly(A) repeats of L1 and Alu SINE are critical for their retroposition, L1 probably recognizes the poly(A) repeats, thereby mobilizing not only Alu SINE but also cytosolic mRNA. Many flowering plants only harbor L1-clade LINEs and a significant number of SINEs with poly(A) repeats, but no homology to the LINEs. Moreover, processed pseudogenes have also been found in flowering plants. I propose that the ancestral L1-clade LINE in the common ancestor of green plants may have recognized a specific RNA template, with stringent recognition then becoming relaxed during the course of plant evolution.

piRNA-mediated transgenerational inheritance of an acquired trait

The maintenance of genome integrity is an essential trait to the successful transmission of genetic information. In animal germ cells, piRNAs guide PIWI proteins to silence transposable elements (TEs) in order to maintain genome integrity. In insects, most TE silencing in the germline is achieved by secondary piRNAs that are produced by a feed-forward loop (the ping-pong cycle), which requires the piRNA-directed cleavage of two types of RNAs: mRNAs of functional euchromatic TEs and heterochromatic transcripts that contain defective TE sequences. The first cleavage that initiates such an amplification loop remains poorly understood. Taking advantage of the existence of strains that are devoid of functional copies of the LINE-like I-element, we report here that in such Drosophila ovaries, the initiation of a ping-pong cycle is exclusively achieved by secondary I-element piRNAs that are produced in the ovary and deposited in the embryonic germline. This unusual secondary piRNA biogenesis, detected in the absence of functional I-element copies, results from the processing of sense and antisense transcripts of several different defective I-element. Once acquired, for instance after ancestor aging, this capacity to produce heterochromatic-only secondary piRNAs is partially transmitted through generations via maternal piRNAs. Furthermore, such piRNAs acting as ping-pong initiators in a chromatin-independent manner confer to the progeny a high capacity to repress the I-element mobility. Our study explains, at the molecular level, the basis for epigenetic memory of maternal immunity that protects females from hybrid dysgenesis caused by transposition of paternally inherited functional I-element.

Non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons: mechanisms, recent developments, and unanswered questions

Non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons are present in most eukaryotic genomes. In some species, such as humans, these elements are the most abundant genome sequence and continue to replicate to this day, creating a source of endogenous mutations and potential genotoxic stress. This review will provide a general outline of the replicative cycle of non-LTR retrotransposons. Recent findings regarding the host regulation of non-LTR retrotransposons will be summarized. Finally, future directions of interest will be discussed.

Internal priming: an opportunistic pathway for L1 and Alu retrotransposition in hominins

Retrotransposons, specifically Alu and L1 elements, have been especially successful in their expansion throughout primate genomes. While most of these elements integrate through an endonuclease-mediated process termed target primed reverse transcription, a minority integrate using alternative methods. Here we present evidence for one such mechanism, which we term internal priming and demonstrate that loci integrating through this mechanism are qualitatively different from "classical" insertions. Previous examples of this mechanism are limited to cell culture assays, which show that reverse transcription can initiate upstream of the 3' poly-A tail during retrotransposon integration. To detect whether this mechanism occurs in vivo as well as in cell culture, we have analyzed the human genome for internal priming events using recently integrated L1 and Alu elements. Our examination of the human genome resulted in the recovery of twenty events involving internal priming insertions, which are structurally distinct from both classical TPRT-mediated insertions and non-classical insertions. We suggest two possible mechanisms by which these internal priming loci are created and provide evidence supporting a role in staggered DNA double-strand break repair. Also, we demonstrate that the internal priming process is associated with inter-chromosomal duplications and the insertion of filler DNA.

Genome-wide screening and characterization of transposable elements and their distribution analysis in the silkworm, Bombyx mori

To elucidate the contribution of transposable elements (TEs) to the silkworm genome structure and evolution, we have conducted genome-wide analysis of TEs using the newly released genome assembly. The TEs made up 35% of the genome and contributed greatly to the genome size. Non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons (non-LTRs) and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) were the predominant TE classes. From characterization of the TE distribution in the genome, it was revealed that non-LTRs, especially R1 clade elements, are frequently inserted into GC-rich regions. The GC content of non-LTRs themselves was over 40%, which indicate their contribution to the GC content of the insertion region. TEs accumulated in regions with low gene density, and there were relatively strong positive correlations between TE density and chromosomal recombination rate. We also characterized the clade distribution of the non-LTRs. The silkworm non-LTRs represented 10 of the 16 previously defined clades, which had the most variety than that reported for other genomes. Two partial CRE clade elements were found, which is one of the most ancient lineages of non-LTRs, and have been only found in Trypanosoma and fungi before. This analysis suggests that Bombyx genome is influenced by numerous amounts and variety of TEs.

The diversity of retrotransposons and the properties of their reverse transcriptases

A number of abundant mobile genetic elements called retrotransposons reverse transcribe RNA to generate DNA for insertion into eukaryotic genomes. Four major classes of retrotransposons are described here. First, the long-terminal-repeat (LTR) retrotransposons have similar structures and mechanisms to those of the vertebrate retroviruses. Genes that may enable these retrotransposons to leave a cell have been acquired by these elements in a number of animal and plant lineages. Second, the tyrosine recombinase retrotransposons are similar to the LTR retrotransposons except that they have substituted a recombinase for the integrase and recombine into the host chromosomes. Third, the non-LTR retrotransposons use a cleaved chromosomal target site generated by an encoded endonuclease to prime reverse transcription. Finally, the Penelope-like retrotransposons are not well understood but appear to also use cleaved DNA or the ends of chromosomes as primer for reverse transcription. Described in the second part of this review are the enzymatic properties of the reverse transcriptases (RTs) encoded by retrotransposons. The RTs of the LTR retrotransposons are highly divergent in sequence but have similar enzymatic activities to those of retroviruses. The RTs of the non-LTR retrotransposons have several unique properties reflecting their adaptation to a different mechanism of retrotransposition.

RNA from the 5' end of the R2 retrotransposon controls R2 protein binding to and cleavage of its DNA target site

Non-LTR retrotransposons insert into eukaryotic genomes by target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT), a process in which cleaved DNA targets are used to prime reverse transcription of the element's RNA transcript. Many of the steps in the integration pathway of these elements can be characterized in vitro for the R2 element because of the rigid sequence specificity of R2 for both its DNA target and its RNA template. R2 retrotransposition involves identical subunits of the R2 protein bound to different DNA sequences upstream and downstream of the insertion site. The key determinant regulating which DNA-binding conformation the protein adopts was found to be a 320-nt RNA sequence from near the 5' end of the R2 element. In the absence of this 5' RNA the R2 protein binds DNA sequences upstream of the insertion site, cleaves the first DNA strand, and conducts TPRT when RNA containing the 3' untranslated region of the R2 transcript is present. In the presence of the 320-nt 5' RNA, the R2 protein binds DNA sequences downstream of the insertion site. Cleavage of the second DNA strand by the downstream subunit does not appear to occur until after the 5' RNA is removed from this subunit. We postulate that the removal of the 5' RNA normally occurs during reverse transcription, and thus provides a critical temporal link to first- and second-strand DNA cleavage in the R2 retrotransposition reaction.

Cis-preferential LINE-1 reverse transcriptase activity in ribonucleoprotein particles

LINE-1 retrotransposons (L1s) constitute approximately 17% of human DNA, and their activity continues to affect genome evolution. Retrotransposition-competent human L1s encode two proteins required for their mobility (ORF1p and ORF2p); however, biochemical activities associated with ORF2p have been difficult to detect in cells. Here, we show for the first time the colocalization of L1 RNA, ORF1p and ORF2p to a putative ribonucleoprotein retrotransposition intermediate. We further demonstrate that ORF2p preferentially uses its encoding RNA as a template for reverse transcription. Thus, our data provide the first biochemical evidence supporting the cis-preferential action of the L1 reverse transcriptase.

Telomere-specific non-LTR retrotransposons and telomere maintenance in the silkworm, Bombyx mori

Most insects have telomeres that consist of pentanucleotide (TTAGG) telomeric repeats, which are synthesized by telomerase. However, all species in Diptera so far examined and several species in other orders of insect have lost the (TTAGG)n repeats, suggesting that some of them recruit telomerase-independent telomere maintenance. The silkworm, Bombyx mori, retains the TTAGG motifs in the chromosomal ends but expresses quite a low level of telomerase activity in all stages of various tissues. Just proximal to a 6-8-kb stretch of the TTAGG repeats in B. mori, more than 1000 copies of non-LTR retrotransposons, designated TRAS and SART families, occur among the telomeric repeats and accumulate. TRAS and SART are abundantly transcribed and actively retrotransposed into TTAGG telomeric repeats in a highly sequence-specific manner. They have three possible mechanisms to ensure specific integration into the telomeric repeats. This article focuses on the telomere structure and telomere-specific non-LTR retrotransposons in B. mori and discusses the mechanisms for telomere maintenance in this insect.

R2 target-primed reverse transcription: ordered cleavage and polymerization steps by protein subunits asymmetrically bound to the target DNA

R2 elements are non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons that specifically insert into 28S rRNA genes of many animal groups. These elements encode a single protein with reverse transcriptase and endonuclease activities as well as specific DNA and RNA binding properties. In this report, gel shift experiments were conducted to investigate the stoichiometry of the DNA, RNA, and protein components of the integration reaction. The enzymatic functions associated with each of the protein complexes were also determined, and DNase I digests were used to footprint the protein onto the target DNA. Additionally, a short polypeptide containing the N-terminal putative DNA-binding motifs was footprinted on the DNA target site. These combined findings revealed that one protein subunit binds the R2 RNA template and the DNA 10 to 40 bp upstream of the insertion site. This subunit cleaves the first DNA strand and uses that cleavage to prime reverse transcription of the R2 RNA transcript. Another protein subunit(s) uses the N-terminal DNA binding motifs to bind to the 18 bp of target DNA downstream of the insertion site and is responsible for cleavage of the second DNA strand. A complete model for the R2 integration reaction is presented, which with minor modifications is adaptable to other non-LTR retrotransposons.

The changing tails of a novel short interspersed element in Aedes aegypti: genomic evidence for slippage retrotransposition and the relationship between 3' tandem repeats and the poly(dA) tail

A novel family of tRNA-related SINEs named gecko was discovered in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Approximately 7200 copies of gecko were distributed in the A. aegypti genome with a significant bias toward A + T-rich regions. The 3' end of gecko is similar in sequence and identical in secondary structure to the 3' end of MosquI, a non-LTR retrotransposon in A. aegypti. Nine conserved substitutions and a deletion separate gecko into two groups. Group I includes all gecko that end with poly(dA) and a copy that ends with AGAT repeats. Group II comprises gecko elements that end with CCAA or CAAT repeats. Members within each group cannot be differentiated when the 3' repeats are excluded in phylogenetic and sequence analyses, suggesting that the alterations of 3' tails are recent. Imperfect poly(dA) tail was recorded in group I and partial replication of the 3' tandem repeats was frequently observed in group II. Genomic evidence underscores the importance of slippage retrotransposition in the alteration and expansion of the tandem repeat during the evolution of gecko sequences, although we do not rule out postinsertion mechanisms that were previously invoked to explain the evolution of Alu-associated microsatellites. We propose that the 3' tandem repeats and the poly(dA) tail may be generated by similar mechanisms during retrotransposition of both SINEs and non-LTR retrotransposons and thus the distinction between poly(dA) retrotransposons such as L1 and non-poly(dA) retrotransposons such as I factor may not be informative.

Alu retrotransposition-mediated deletion

Alu repeats contribute to genomic instability in primates via insertional and recombinational mutagenesis. Here, we report an analysis of Alu element-induced genomic instability through a novel mechanism termed retrotransposition-mediated deletion, and assess its impact on the integrity of primate genomes. For human and chimpanzee genomes, we find evidence of 33 retrotransposition-mediated deletion events that have eliminated approximately 9000 nucleotides of genomic DNA. Our data suggest that, during the course of primate evolution, Alu retrotransposition may have contributed to over 3000 deletion events, eliminating approximately 900 kb of DNA in the process. Potential mechanisms for the creation of Alu retrotransposition-mediated deletions include L1 endonuclease-dependent retrotransposition, L1 endonuclease-independent retrotransposition, internal priming on DNA breaks, and promiscuous target primed reverse transcription. A comprehensive analysis of the collateral effects by Alu mobilization on all primate genomes will require sequenced genomes from representatives of the entire order.

Essential motifs in the 3' untranslated region required for retrotransposition and the precise start of reverse transcription in non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposon SART1

Non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons amplify their copies by reverse transcribing mRNA from the 3' end, but the initial processes of reverse transcription are still unclear. We have shown that a telomere-specific non-LTR retrotransposon of the silkworm, SART1, requires the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) for retrotransposition. With an in vivo retrotransposition assay, we identified several novel motifs within the 3' UTR involved in precise and efficient reverse transcription. Of 461 nucleotides (nt) of the 3' UTR, the central region, from nt 163 to nt 295, was essential for SART1 retrotransposition. Of five putative stem-loops formed in RNA for the SART1 3' UTR, the second stem-loop (nt 159 to 221) is included in this region. Loss of the 3' region (nt 296 to 461) in the 3' UTR and the poly(A) tract resulted in decreased and inaccurate reverse transcription, which starts mostly from several telomeric repeat-like GGUU sequences just downstream of the second stem-loop. These results suggest that short telomeric repeat-like sequences in the 3' UTR anneal to the bottom strand of (TTAGG)(n) repeats. We also demonstrated that the mRNA for green fluorescent protein (GFP) could be retrotransposed into telomeric repeats when the GFP coding region is fused with the SART1 3' UTR and SART1 open reading frame proteins are supplied in trans.

Gene silencing triggered by non-LTR retrotransposons in the female germline of Drosophila melanogaster

Several studies have recently shown that the activity of some eukaryotic transposable elements is sensitive to the presence of homologous transgenes, suggesting the involvement of homology-dependent gene-silencing mechanisms in their regulation. Here we provide data indicating that two non-LTR retrotransposons of Drosophila melanogaster are themselves natural triggers of homology-dependent gene silencing. We show that, in the female germline of D. melanogaster, fragments from the R1 or from the I retrotransposons can mediate silencing of chimeric transcription units into which they are inserted. This silencing is probably mediated by sequence identity with endogenous copies of the retrotransposons because it does not occur with a fragment from the divergent R1 elements of Bombyx mori, and, when a fragment of I is used, it occurs only in females containing functional copies of the I element. This silencing is not accompanied by cosuppression of the endogenous gene homologous to the chimeric transcription unit, which contrasts to some other silencing mechanisms in Drosophila. These observations suggest that in the female germline of D. melanogaster the R1 and I retrotransposons may self-regulate their own activity and their copy number by triggering homology-dependent gene silencing.

Chimeric RNA transposition intermediates of the I factor produce precise retrotransposed copies

I elements in Drosophila melanogaster are non-long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons of particular interest because high levels of transposition can be induced by appropriate crosses. They use a full-length RNA transposition intermediate as a template for reverse transcription. Detailed molecular characterization of this intermediate is rendered difficult because of the many transcripts produced by defective elements. The use of an active I element marked with a sequence encoding the HA epitope solves this problem. We used an RNA circularization procedure followed by RT-PCR to analyze the transcripts produced by actively transposing tagged I elements. Most start at the 5' end at the second nucleotide of the I element and all are polyadenylated at a site located in genomic sequences downstream of the 3' end. One of the tagged I elements, inserted in locus 88A, produces chimeric transcripts that carry sequences from both 5'- and 3'-flanking genomic DNA. We show that synthesis of these chimeric transcripts is controlled by the I element itself. Analysis of full-length transposed copies of this element shows that the extra sequences at the 5' and 3' ends are not integrated during retrotransposition. This suggests that initiation and arrest of reverse transcription during retrotransposition are precise processes.