Roles for inhibitory interactions in the use of the -10 promoter element by sigma 70 holoenzyme

The bacterial promoter spacer modulates promoter strength and timing by length, TG-motifs and DNA supercoiling sensitivity

Transcription, the first step to gene expression, is a central coordination process in all living matter. Besides a plethora of regulatory mechanisms, the promoter architecture sets the foundation of expression strength, timing and the potential for further regulatory modulation. In this study, we investigate the effects of promoter spacer length and sequence composition on strength and supercoiling sensitivity in bacteria. Combining transcriptomics data analysis and standardized synthetic promoter libraries, we exclude effects of specific promoter sequence contexts. Analysis of promoter activity shows a strong variance with spacer length and spacer sequence composition. A detailed study of the spacer sequence composition under selective conditions reveals an extension to the -10 region that enhances RNAP binding but damps promoter activity. Using physiological changes in DNA supercoiling levels, we link promoter supercoiling sensitivity to overall spacer GC-content. Time-resolved promoter activity screens, only possible with a novel mild treatment approach, reveal strong promoter timing potentials solely based on DNA supercoiling sensitivity in the absence of regulatory sites or alternative sigma factors.

Transcription Initiation by Mix and Match Elements: Flexibility for Polymerase Binding to Bacterial Promoters

Bacterial RNA polymerase is composed of a core of subunits (β β′, α1, α2, ω), which have RNA synthesizing activity, and a specificity factor (σ), which identifies the start of transcription by recognizing and binding to sequence elements within promoter DNA. Four core promoter consensus sequences, the –10 element, the extended –10 (TGn) element, the –35 element, and the UP elements, have been known for many years; the importance of a nontemplate G at position -5 has been recognized more recently. However, the functions of these elements are not the same. The AT-rich UP elements, the –35 elements (–35TTGACA–30), and the extended –10 (15TGn–13) are recognized as double-stranded binding elements, whereas the –5 nontemplate G is recognized in the context of single-stranded DNA at the transcription bubble. Furthermore, the –10 element (–12TATAAT–7) is recognized as both double-stranded DNA for the T:A bp at position –12 and as nontemplate, single-stranded DNA from positions –11 to –7. The single-stranded sequences at positions –11 to –7 as well as the –5 contribute to later steps in transcription initiation that involve isomerization of polymerase and separation of the promoter DNA around the transcription start site. Recent work has demonstrated that the double-stranded elements may be used in various combinations to yield an effective promoter. Thus, while some minimal number of contacts is required for promoter function, polymerase allows the elements to be mixed and matched. Interestingly, which particular elements are used does not appear to fundamentally alter the transcription bubble generated in the stable complex. In this review, we discuss the multiple steps involved in forming a transcriptionally competent polymerase/promoter complex, and we examine what is known about polymerase recognition of core promoter elements. We suggest that considering promoter elements according to their involvement in early (polymerase binding) or later (polymerase isomerization) steps in transcription initiation rather than simply from their match to conventional promoter consensus sequences is a more instructive form of promoter classification.

Structural basis for promoter-10 element recognition by the bacterial RNA polymerase σ subunit

The key step in bacterial promoter opening is recognition of the -10 promoter element (T(-12)A(-11)T(-10)A(-9)A(-8)T(-7) consensus sequence) by the RNA polymerase σ subunit. We determined crystal structures of σ domain 2 bound to single-stranded DNA bearing-10 element sequences. Extensive interactions occur between the protein and the DNA backbone of every -10 element nucleotide. Base-specific interactions occur primarily with A(-11) and T(-7), which are flipped out of the single-stranded DNA base stack and buried deep in protein pockets. The structures, along with biochemical data, support a model where the recognition of the -10 element sequence drives initial promoter opening as the bases of the nontemplate strand are extruded from the DNA double-helix and captured by σ. These results provide a detailed structural basis for the critical roles of A(-11) and T(-7) in promoter melting and reveal important insights into the initiation of transcription bubble formation.

Promoter spacer DNA plays an active role in integrating the functional consequences of RNA polymerase contacts with -10 and -35 promoter elements

Bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) interacts with conserved -10 and -35 promoter elements to recognize the promoter and to form an open complex in which DNA duplex around transcription start site melts. Using model DNA constructs (fork junction DNA) that mimic DNA structure found in the open complex we observed that the consequences of mutations in -10 promoter element for RNAP binding exhibited a striking dependence on the presence or absence of a functional -35 promoter element. A role of spacer DNA (a non-conserved DNA sequence connecting -10 and -35 promoter elements) in this phenomenon was probed with a series of fork junction DNA constructs containing perturbations to the spacer DNA. In the absence of a physical connection between the -10 and -35 DNA elements, or when -10 and -35 DNA elements were connected by a long flexible non-DNA linker, the dependence of RNAP interactions with -10 element on the strength of -35 element was lost. When these DNA elements were linked by a rigid DNA duplex or by a DNA duplex containing a short single-stranded gap, the coupling between the -10 and -35 binding activities was observed. These results indicated that promoter spacer DNA played an active role in integrating the functional consequences of RNA polymerase contacts with -10 and -35 promoter element. This role likely involves physical deformation of the spacer occurring in parallel with promoter melting as shown by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) experiments with the probes incorporated into spacer DNA.

A critical role of downstream RNA polymerase-promoter interactions in the formation of initiation complex

Nucleation of promoter melting in bacteria is coupled with RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding to a conserved -10 promoter element located at the upstream edge of the transcription bubble. The mechanism of downstream propagation of the transcription bubble to include the transcription start site is unclear. Here we introduce new model downstream fork junction promoter fragments that specifically bind RNAP and mimic the downstream segment of promoter complexes. We demonstrate that RNAP binding to downstream fork junctions is coupled with DNA melting around the transcription start point. Consequently, certain downstream fork junction probes can serve as transcription templates. Using a protein beacon fluorescent method, we identify structural determinants of affinity and transcription activity of RNAP-downstream fork junction complexes. Measurements of RNAP interaction with double-stranded promoter fragments reveal that the strength of RNAP interactions with downstream DNA plays a critical role in promoter opening and that the length of the downstream duplex must exceed a critical length for efficient formation of transcription competent open promoter complex.

Interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase σ70 subunit with promoter elements in the context of free σ70, RNA polymerase holoenzyme, and the β'-σ70 complex

Promoter recognition by RNA polymerase is a key point in gene expression and a target of regulation. Bacterial RNA polymerase binds promoters in the form of the holoenzyme, with the σ specificity subunit being primarily responsible for promoter recognition. Free σ, however, does not recognize promoter DNA, and it has been proposed that the intrinsic DNA binding ability is masked in free σ but becomes unmasked in the holoenzyme. Here, we use a newly developed fluorescent assay to quantitatively study the interactions of free σ(70) from Escherichia coli, the β'-σ complex, and the σ(70) RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme with non-template strand of the open promoter complex transcription bubble in the context of model non-template oligonucleotides and fork junction templates. We show that σ(70), free or in the context of the holoenzyme, recognizes the -10 promoter element with the same efficiency and specificity. The result implies that there is no need to invoke a conformational change in σ for recognition of the -10 element in the single-stranded form. In the holoenzyme, weak but specific interactions of σ are increased by contacts with DNA downstream of the -10 element. We further show that region 1 of σ(70) is required for stronger interaction with non-template oligonucleotides in the holoenzyme but not in free σ. Finally, we show that binding of the β' RNAP subunit is sufficient to allow specific recognition of the TG motif of the extended -10 promoter element by σ(70). The new fluorescent assay, which we call a protein beacon assay, will be instrumental in quantitative dissection of fine details of RNAP interactions with promoters.

Evidence for a tyrosine-adenine stacking interaction and for a short-lived open intermediate subsequent to initial binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to promoter DNA

Bacterial RNA polymerase and a "sigma" transcription factor form an initiation-competent "open" complex at a promoter by disruption of about 14 base pairs. Strand separation is likely initiated at the highly conserved -11 A-T base pair. Amino acids in conserved region 2.3 of the main Escherichia coli sigma factor, sigma(70), are involved in this process, but their roles are unclear. To monitor the fates of particular bases upon addition of RNA polymerase, promoters bearing single substitutions of the fluorescent A-analog 2-aminopurine (2-AP) at -11 and two other positions in promoter DNA were examined. Evidence was obtained for an open intermediate on the pathway to open complex formation, in which these 2-APs are no longer stacked onto their neighboring bases. The tyrosine at residue 430 in region 2.3 of sigma(70) was shown to be involved in quenching the fluorescence of a 2-AP substituted at -11, presumably through a stacking interaction. These data refine the structural model for open complex formation and reveal a novel interaction involved in DNA melting by RNA polymerase.

Substitution of a highly conserved histidine in the Escherichia coli heat shock transcription factor, sigma32, affects promoter utilization in vitro and leads to overexpression of the biofilm-associated flu protein in vivo

The heat shock sigma factor (sigma(32) in Escherichia coli) directs the bacterial RNA polymerase to promoters of a specific sequence to form a stable complex, competent to initiate transcription of genes whose products mitigate the effects of exposure of the cell to high temperatures. The histidine at position 107 of sigma(32) is at the homologous position of a tryptophan residue at position 433 of the main sigma factor of E. coli, sigma(70). This tryptophan is essential for the strand separation step leading to the formation of the initiation-competent RNA polymerase-promoter complex. The heat shock sigma factors of all gammaproteobacteria sequenced have a histidine at this position, while in the alpha- and deltaproteobacteria, it is a tryptophan. In vitro the alanine-for-histidine substitution at position 107 (H107A) destabilizes complexes between the GroE promoter and RNA polymerase containing sigma(32), implying that H107 plays a role in formation or maintenance of the strand-separated complex. In vivo, the H107A substitution in sigma(32) impedes recovery from heat shock (exposure to 42 degrees C), and it also leads to overexpression at lower temperatures (30 degrees C) of the Flu protein, which is associated with biofilm formation.

The -11A of promoter DNA and two conserved amino acids in the melting region of sigma70 both directly affect the rate limiting step in formation of the stable RNA polymerase-promoter complex, but they do not necessarily interact

Formation of the stable, strand separated, 'open' complex between RNA polymerase and a promoter involves DNA melting of approximately 14 base pairs. The likely nucleation site is the highly conserved -11A base in the non-template strand of the -10 promoter region. Amino acid residues Y430 and W433 on the sigma70 subunit of the RNA polymerase participate in the strand separation. The roles of -11A and of the Y430 and W433 were addressed by employing synthetic consensus promoters containing base analog and other substitutions at -11 in the non-template strand, and sigma70 variants bearing amino acid substitutions at positions 430 and 433. Substitutions for -11A and for Y430 and W433 in sigma70 have small or no effects on formation of the initial RNA polymerase-promoter complex, but exert their effects on subsequent steps on the way to formation of the open complex. As substitutions for Y430 and W433 also affect open complex formation on promoter DNA lacking the -11A base, it is concluded that these amino acid residues have other (or additional) roles, not involving the -11A. The effects of the substitutions at -11A of the promoter and Y430 and W433 of sigma70 are cumulative.

The genome of the novel phage Rtp, with a rosette-like tail tip, is homologous to the genome of phage T1

A new Escherichia coli phage, named Rtp, was isolated and shown to be closely related to phage T1. Electron microscopy revealed that phage Rtp has a morphologically unique tail tip consisting of four leaf-like structures arranged in a rosette, whereas phage T1 has thinner, flexible leaves that thicken toward the ends. In contrast to T1, Rtp did not require FhuA and TonB for infection. The 46.2-kb genome of phage Rtp encodes 75 open reading frames, 47 of which are homologous to phage T1 genes. Like phage T1, phage Rtp encodes a large number of small genes at the genome termini that exhibit no sequence similarity to known genes. Six predicted genes larger than 300 nucleotides in the highly homologous region of Rtp are not found in T1. Two predicted HNH endonucleases are encoded at positions different from those in phage T1. The sequence similarity of rtp37, -38, -39, -41, -42, and -43 to equally arranged genes of lambdoid phages suggests a common tail assembly initiation complex. Protein Rtp43 is homologous to the lambda J protein, which determines lambda host specificity. Since the two proteins differ most in the C-proximal area, where the binding site to the LamB receptor resides in the J protein, we propose that Rtp43 contributes to Rtp host specificity. Lipoproteins similar to the predicted lipoprotein Rtp45 are found in a number of phages (encoded by cor genes) in which they prevent superinfection by inactivating the receptors. We propose that, similar to the proposed function of the phage T5 lipoprotein, Rtp45 prevents inactivation of Rtp by adsorption to its receptor during cells lysis. Rtp52 is a putative transcriptional regulator, for which 10 conserved inverted repeats were identified upstream of genes in the Rtp genome. In contrast, the much larger E. coli genome has only one such repeat sequence.

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase contacts outside the -10 promoter element are not essential for promoter melting

We examined the relative affinity of model promoter constructs for binding Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme. Model promoter constructs were designed to mimic DNA structures characteristic for different steps of transcription initiation. DNA duplexes in which a chemical cross-link was introduced just downstream from -10 hexamer to prevent DNA melting upon RNAP binding were used to mimic RNAP-promoter contacts in a closed complex. Fork junction DNA molecules with double-stranded/single-stranded junction between -11 and -10 position were used to study interactions of RNA polymerase with DNA in open complex. The -35 and -10 promoter regions were found to be equally important for the initial RNAP binding. The recognition of -35 promoter region was independent of structural context of the model promoter fragment. In contrast, free energy of RNAP binding to -10 hexamer was highly dependent on DNA structure. The relative importance of -10 region for sequence-specific interaction with the polymerase was the lowest for constructs mimicking closed complex and the highest for the constructs mimicking open complex. The relative importance of region -10 was also dependent on the presence of -35 consensus element indicating a communication between different DNA binding determinants of polymerase during open complex formation. Short double-stranded promoter fragments comprising only -35 and -10 or only -10 consensus elements underwent melting in a complex with polymerase indicating that the core of promoter melting activity of the polymerase is localized to a very small subset of all promoter-polymerase contacts.

Mechanistic differences in promoter DNA melting by Thermus aquaticus and Escherichia coli RNA polymerases

Formation of strand-separated, functional complexes at promoters was compared for RNA polymerases from the mesophile Escherichia coli and the thermophile Thermus aquaticus. The RNA polymerases contained sigma factors that were wild type or bearing homologous alanine substitutions for two aromatic amino acids involved in DNA melting. Substitutions in the sigmaA subunit of T. aquaticus RNA polymerase impair promoter DNA melting equally at temperatures from 25 to 75 degrees C. However, homologous substitutions in sigma70 render E. coli RNA polymerase progressively more melting-defective as the temperature is reduced below 37 degrees C. The effects of the mutations on the mechanism of promoter DNA melting were investigated by studying the interaction of wild type and mutant RNA polymerases with "partial promoters" mimicking promoter DNA where the nucleation of DNA melting had taken place. Because T. aquaticus and E. coli RNA polymerases bound these templates similarly, it was concluded that the different effects of the mutations on the two polymerases are exerted at a step preceding nucleation of DNA melting. A model is presented for how this mechanistic difference between the two RNA polymerase could explain our observations.

An RNA Polymerase Mutant Deficient in DNA Melting Facilitates Study of Activation Mechanism: Application to an Artificial Activator of Transcription

Transcription initiation is a major target for the regulation of gene expression in all organisms. Transcription activators can stimulate different steps in the initiation process including the initial binding of RNA polymerase (RNAP) to the promoter and a subsequent promoter-melting step. Typically, kinetic assays are required to determine whether an activator exerts its effect on the initial binding of RNAP or on the promoter-melting step. Here we take advantage of a mutant Escherichia coli RNAP that is deficient in promoter melting to assess the ability of an activator to stabilize the initial binding of RNAP to the promoter. For the well-characterized activator CRP, we show that this RNAP mutant can be used to distinguish between effects on initial binding and promoter melting; these results provide an independent confirmation of the results of kinetic analysis. We then employ the melting-deficient RNAP mutant to demonstrate an effect of an artificial activator of transcription on the initial binding of RNAP. Our findings demonstrate that a melting-deficient RNAP mutant can be used to trap a normally unstable intermediate in transcription initiation, thus providing a novel tool for probing activation mechanism.

Reorganisation of an RNA polymerase-promoter DNA complex for DNA melting

Sigma factors, the key regulatory components of the bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP), direct promoter DNA binding and DNA melting. The sigma(54)-RNAP forms promoter complexes in which DNA melting is only triggered by an activator and ATP hydrolysis-driven reorganisation of an initial sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex. We report that an initial bacterial RNAP-DNA complex can be reorganised by an activator to form an intermediate transcription initiation complex where full DNA melting has not yet occurred. Using sigma(54) as a chemical nuclease we now show that the reorganisation of the initial sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex occurs upon interaction with the activator at the transition point of ATP hydrolysis. We demonstrate that this reorganisation event is an early step in the transcription initiation pathway that occurs independently of RNAP parts normally associated with stable DNA melting and open complex formation. Using photoreactive DNA probes, we provide evidence that within this reorganised sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex, DNA contacts across the 'to be melted' sequences are made by the sigma(54) subunit. Strikingly, the activator protein, but not core RNAP subunits, is close to these DNA sequences.

The activity of a single-stranded promoter of plasmid ColIb-P9 depends on its secondary structure

The leading region of the conjugal bacterial plasmid ColIb-P9 contains three dispersed repeats of a 328 bp sequence homologous to Frpo, a sequence from plasmid F that acts as a promoter in single-stranded DNA. One of these sequences, ssi3, inactive in the double-stranded form, promoted in vitro transcription exclusively from the single strand that is transferred during conjugation. Promoter activity was dependent on the presence of RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing sigma 70. Transcription initiated from the position predicted from folding the single-stranded DNA to form a pseudo double-stranded hairpin structure containing recognizable -35 and -10 promoter elements. Footprinting of RNA polymerase holoenzyme on single-stranded ssi3 DNA was consistent with this suggestion. Mutagenesis of the putative -35 region inactivated the promoter, but random mutations in the -10 region had little effect. The putative -10 region is a poor match to the consensus sequence and contains mismatched bases. Elimination of these mismatches invariably destroyed single-strand promoter activity. These observations reveal the crucial contribution of the unpaired bases in the -10 region in potentiating the formation of the productive open complex with RNA polymerase.

Osmo-regulation of bacterial transcription via poised RNA polymerase

Adaptation to high-salt environments is critical for the survival of a wide range of cells, especially for pathogenic bacteria that colonize the animal gut and urinary tract. The adaptation strategy involves production of the salt potassium glutamate, which induces a specific gene expression program that produces electro-neutral osmolytes while inhibiting general sigma(70) transcription. These data show that in Escherichia coli potassium glutamate stimulates transcription by disengaging inhibitory polymerase interactions at a sigma(38) promoter. These occur in an upstream region that is marked by an osmotic shock promoter DNA consensus sequence. The disruption activates a poised RNA polymerase to transcribe. This transcription program leads to the production of osmolytes that are shown to have only minor effects on transcription and therefore help to restore normal cell function. An osmotic shock gene expression cycle is discussed.

Mechanism of stimulation of ribosomal promoters by binding of the +1 and +2 nucleotides

The rate of transcription of Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA promoters is central to adjusting the cellular growth rate to nutritional conditions. The +1 initiating nucleotide and ppGpp are regulatory effectors of these promoters. The data herein show that in vitro transcription is also regulated by the +2 nucleotide. Both the +1 and +2 nucleotides act by driving polymerase into an altered conformation rather than by increasing the lifetime of transcription complexes. The unique design of the ribosomal promoters may stabilize a distorted state of polymerase that is relieved by the binding of the two nucleotides required for transcription initiation.