The Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A stimulates sigmaA-dependent transcription prior to the major energetic barrier

Arginine kinase McsB and ClpC complex impairs the transition to biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis

Robust biofilm formation on host niches facilitates beneficial Bacillus to promote plant growth and inhibit plant pathogens. Arginine kinase McsB is involved in bacterial development and stress reaction by phosphorylating proteins for degradation through a ClpC/ClpP protease. Conversely, cognate arginine phosphatase YwlE counteracts the process. Regulatory pathways of biofilm formation have been studied in Bacillus subtilis, of which Spo0A∼P is a master transcriptional regulator, which is transcriptionally activated by itself in biofilm formation. Previous studies have shown that Spo0A∼P transcript regulation controls biofilm formation, where MecA binds ClpC to inhibit Spo0A∼P-dependent transcription without triggering degradation. It remains unclear whether McsB and ClpC regulate biofilm formation together and share a similar non-proteolytic mechanism like MecA/ClpC complex. In this study, we characterized McsB and ClpC as negative regulators of biofilm formation and matrix gene eps expression. Our genetic and morphological evidence further indicates that McsB and ClpC inhibit eps expression by decreasing the spo0A and sinI expression, leading to the release of SinR, a known repressor of eps transcription. Given that the spo0A and sinI expression is transcriptionally activated by Spo0A∼P in biofilm formation, we next demonstrate that McsB interacts with Spo0A directly by bacterial two-hybrid system and Glutathione transferase pull-down experiments. Additionally, we present that McsB forms a complex with ClpC to dampen biofilm formation in vivo. Finally, we show that YwlE acts as a positive regulator of biofilm formation, counteracting the function of McsB. These findings suggest that McsB, ClpC, and YwlE play vital roles in the transition to biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis, providing new insights into the regulatory mechanisms underlying biofilm development and sharing a similar non-proteolytic mechanism in biofilm formation as MecA/ClpC complex.

Prophage-encoded small protein YqaH counteracts the activities of the replication initiator DnaA in Bacillus subtilis

Bacterial genomes harbour cryptic prophages that are mostly transcriptionally silent with many unannotated genes. Still, cryptic prophages may contribute to their host fitness and phenotypes. In Bacillus subtilis, the yqaF-yqaN operon belongs to the prophage element skin, and is tightly repressed by the Xre-like repressor SknR. This operon contains several small ORFs (smORFs) potentially encoding small-sized proteins. The smORF-encoded peptide YqaH was previously reported to bind to the replication initiator DnaA. Here, using a yeast two-hybrid assay, we found that YqaH binds to the DNA binding domain IV of DnaA and interacts with Spo0A, a master regulator of sporulation. We isolated single amino acid substitutions in YqaH that abolished the interaction with DnaA but not with Spo0A. Then, using a plasmid-based inducible system to overexpress yqaH WT and mutant derivatives, we studied in B. subtilis the phenotypes associated with the specific loss-of-interaction with DnaA (DnaA_LOI). We found that expression of yqaH carrying DnaA_LOI mutations abolished the deleterious effects of yqaH WT expression on chromosome segregation, replication initiation and DnaA-regulated transcription. When YqaH was induced after vegetative growth, DnaA_LOI mutations abolished the drastic effects of YqaH WT on sporulation and biofilm formation. Thus, YqaH inhibits replication, sporulation and biofilm formation mainly by antagonizing DnaA in a manner that is independent of the cell cycle checkpoint Sda.

Transcription activation by the siderophore sensor Btr is mediated by ligand-dependent stimulation of promoter clearance

Bacterial transcription factors often function as DNA-binding proteins that selectively activate or repress promoters, although the biochemical mechanisms vary. In most well-understood examples, activators function by either increasing the affinity of RNA polymerase (RNAP) for the target promoter, or by increasing the isomerization of the initial closed complex to the open complex. We report that Bacillus subtilis Btr, a member of the AraC family of activators, functions principally as a ligand-dependent activator of promoter clearance. In the presence of its co-activator, the siderophore bacillibactin (BB), the Btr:BB complex enhances productive transcription, while having only modest effects on either RNAP promoter association or the production of abortive transcripts. Btr binds to two direct repeat sequences adjacent to the −35 region; recognition of the downstream motif is most important for establishing a productive interaction between the Btr:BB complex and RNAP. The resulting Btr:BB dependent increase in transcription enables the production of the ferric-BB importer to be activated by the presence of its cognate substrate.

ExsA recruits RNA polymerase to an extended -10 promoter by contacting region 4.2 of sigma-70

ExsA is a member of the AraC family of transcriptional activators and is required for expression of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system (T3SS). ExsA-dependent promoters consist of two binding sites for monomeric ExsA located approximately 50 bp upstream of the transcription start sites. Binding to both sites is required for recruitment of sigma(70)-RNA polymerase (RNAP) to the promoter. ExsA-dependent promoters also contain putative -35 hexamers that closely match the sigma(70) consensus but are atypically spaced 21 or 22 bp from the -10 hexamer. Because several nucleotides located within the putative -35 region are required for ExsA binding, it is unclear whether the putative -35 region makes an additional contribution to transcription initiation. In the present study we demonstrate that the putative -35 hexamer is dispensable for ExsA-independent transcription from the P(exsC) promoter and that deletion of sigma(70) region 4.2, which contacts the -35 hexamer, has no effect on ExsA-independent transcription from P(exsC). Region 4.2 of sigma(70), however, is required for ExsA-dependent activation of the P(exsC) and P(exsD) promoters. Genetic data suggest that ExsA directly contacts region 4.2 of sigma(70), and several amino acids were found to contribute to the interaction. In vitro transcription assays demonstrate that an extended -10 element located in the P(exsC) promoter is important for overall promoter activity. Our collective data suggest a model in which ExsA compensates for the lack of a -35 hexamer by interacting with region 4.2 of sigma(70) to recruit RNAP to the promoter.

An A257V mutation in the bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A prevents regulated expression of promoters with low-consensus binding sites

In Bacillus species, the master regulator of sporulation is Spo0A. Spo0A functions by both activating and repressing transcription initiation from target promoters that contain 0A boxes, the binding sites for Spo0A. Several classes of spo0A mutants have been isolated, and the molecular basis for their phenotypes has been determined. However, the molecular basis of the Spo0A(A257V) substitution, representative of an unusual phenotypic class, is not understood. Spo0A(A257V) is unusual in that it abolishes sporulation; in vivo, it fails to activate transcription from key stage II promoters yet retains the ability to repress the abrB promoter. To determine how Spo0A(A257V) retains the ability to repress but not stimulate transcription, we performed a series of in vitro and in vivo assays. We found unexpectedly that the mutant protein both stimulated transcription from the spoIIG promoter and repressed transcription from the abrB promoter, albeit twofold less than the wild type. A DNA binding analysis of Spo0A(A257V) showed that the mutant protein was less able to tolerate alterations in the sequence and arrangement of its DNA binding sites than the wild-type protein. In addition, we found that Spo0A(A257V) could stimulate transcription of a mutant spoIIG promoter in vivo in which low-consensus binding sites were replaced by high-consensus binding sites. We conclude that Spo0A(A257V) is able to bind to and regulate the expression of only genes whose promoters contain high-consensus binding sites and that this effect is sufficient to explain the observed sporulation defect.

Activation of transcription initiation by Spx: formation of transcription complex and identification of a Cis-acting element required for transcriptional activation

The Spx protein of Bacillus subtilis interacts with RNA polymerase (RNAP) to activate transcription initiation in response to thiol-oxidative stress. Protein-DNA cross-linking analysis of reactions containing RNAP, Spx and trxA (thioredoxin) or trxB (thioredoxin reductase) promoter DNA was undertaken to uncover the organization of the Spx-activated transcription initiation complex. Spx induced contact between the RNAP sigma(A) subunit and the -10 promoter sequence of trxA and B, and contact of the betabeta' subunits with core promoter DNA. No Spx-DNA contact was detected. Spx mutants, Spx(C10A) and Spx(G52R.), or RNAP alpha C-terminal domain mutants that impair productive Spx-RNAP interaction did not induce heightened sigma and betabeta' contact with the core promoter. Deletion analysis and the activity of hybrid promoter constructs having upstream trxB DNA fused at positions -31, -36 and -41 of the srf (surfactin synthetase) promoter indicated that a cis-acting site between -50 and -36 was required for Spx activity. Mutations at -43 and -44 of trxB abolished Spx-dependent transcription and Spx-induced cross-linking between the sigma subunit and the -10 region. These data are consistent with a model that Spx activation requires contact between the Spx/RNAP complex and upstream promoter DNA, which allows Spx-induced engagement of the sigma and large subunits with the core promoter.

Promoter activation by repositioning of RNA polymerase

Spo0A, a classical two-component-type response regulator in Bacillus subtilis, binds to a specific DNA sequence found in many promoters to repress or activate the transcription of over 100 genes. On the spoIIG promoter, one of the Spo0A binding sites, centered at position -40, overlaps a consensus -35 element that may also interact with region 4 of the sigma A (sigma(A)) subunit of RNA polymerase. Molecular modeling corroborated by genetic evidence led us to propose that the binding of Spo0A to this site repositions sigma(A) region 4 on the promoter. Therefore, we used a chemical nuclease, p-bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA-Fe, that was covalently tethered to a single cysteine in region 4 of sigma(A) to map the position of sigma(A) on the promoter. The results indicated that in the absence of Spo0A, sigma(A) region 4 of the RNA polymerase was located near the -35 element sequence centered at position -40. However, in the presence of Spo0A, sigma(A) region 4 was displaced downstream from the -35 element by 4 bp. These and other results support the model in which the binding of Spo0A to the spoIIG promoter stimulates promoter utilization by repositioning prebound RNA polymerase and stabilizing the repositioned RNA polymerase-promoter complex at a new position that aligns sigma(A) region 2 with the -10 region sequences of the promoter, thus facilitating open complex formation.

Bacillus subtilis RNA Polymerase Recruits the Transcription Factor Spo0A∼P to Stabilize a Closed Complex during Transcription Initiation

The Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A approximately P activates transcription from the spoIIG promoter by stimulating a rate-limiting transition between the initial interaction of RNA polymerase with the promoter and initiation of RNA synthesis. Previous work showed that Spo0A exerts its effect on RNA polymerase prior to the formation of an open complex in which the DNA strands at the initiation site have been separated. To isolate the effect of Spo0A approximately P on events prior to DNA strand separation at spoIIG we studied RNA polymerase binding to DNA fragments that were truncated to contain only promoter sequences 5' to the -10 element by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. RNA polymerase bound to these fragments readily though highly reversibly, and polymerase-promoter complexes recruited Spo0A approximately P. Sequence-independent interactions between the RNA polymerase and the DNA upstream of the core promoter were important for RNA polymerase binding and essential for Spo0A approximately P recruitment, while sequence-specific Spo0A approximately P-DNA interactions positioned and stabilized RNA polymerase binding to the DNA. Spo0A approximately P decreased the dissociation rate of the complexes formed with truncated promoter templates which could contribute to the means by which Spo0A approximately P stimulates spoIIG expression.

Dual role of the PhoP approximately P response regulator: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 phytase gene transcription is directed by positive and negative interactions with the phyC promoter

Several Bacillus strains secrete phytase, an enzyme catalyzing dephosphorylation of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate (phytate). We identified the phyC (phytase) gene from environmental Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 as a member of the phosphate starvation-inducible PhoPR regulon. In vivo and in vitro assays revealed that PhoP approximately P is essential for phyC transcription. The transcriptional start site was identified downstream of a sigmaA-like promoter region located 27 bp upstream of the probable translation ATG start codon. Inspection of the phyC promoter sequence revealed an unusual structure. The -35 and -10 regions are separated by a window of 21 bp. A pair of tandemly repeated PhoP TT(T/A/C)ACA binding boxes was located within and upstream of the -35 consensus promoter region. A single PhoP box was found within the -10 consensus promoter region. DNase I footprinting experiments performed with isolated PhoP confirmed that PhoP approximately P binds at two sites overlapping with the phyC -35 and -10 consensus promoter region. While binding of dimeric PhoP approximately P at -35 is essential for activation of the phyC promoter, binding of PhoP approximately P at -10 suppresses promoter activity. A sixfold enhancement of phyC gene expression was registered after T:G substitution of nucleotide -13 (mutant MUT13), which eliminates PhoP binding at the single PhoP box without impairing the -10 consensus sequence. Moreover, MUT13 also expressed phyC during phosphate-replete growth, suggesting that the repressing effect due to binding of PhoP approximately P at -10 was abolished. A model is presented in which transcription initiation of phyC is positively and negatively affected by the actual concentration of the PhoP approximately P response regulator.

Phosphorylation and functional analysis of the sporulation initiation factor Spo0A from Clostridium botulinum

The initiation of sporulation in aerobic Bacillus species is regulated by the phosphorelay consisting of several sensor histidine kinases, the Spo0F response regulator, the Spo0B phosphotransferase and the Spo0A transcription factor that upon phosphorylation represses genes for growth and activates the developmental process. Clostridium species lack both Spo0F and Spo0B and the identities of the sensor histidine kinases are unknown. The amino acid sequence of Spo0A is highly conserved in Clostridium botulinum relative to Bacillus subtilis but the cloned C. botulinum Spo0A was unable to complement a spo0A mutant of B. subtilis for sporulation. However, it was able to repress the abrB gene of B. subtilis. Active site mutations in Spo0A still repressed, indicating this activity was independent of phosphorylation. An orphan sensor histidine kinase of C. botulinum appeared to normally phosphorylate C. botulinum Spo0A and expression of this kinase in combination with C. botulinum Spo0A in B. subtilis was lethal, suggesting phosphorylation of C. botulinum Spo0A repressed essential growth genes as a prerequisite to sporulation but could not compensate for this effect by inducing sporulation. A chimera Spo0A consisting of a B. subtilis Spo0A response regulator domain fused to a C. botulinum DNA-binding domain was capable of restoring sporulation to a spo0A mutant of B. subtilis albeit at less than wild-type levels. The data suggest that induction of sporulation requires interactions of both domains of Spo0A with other conserved proteins and despite the high conservation of the amino acid sequence of C. botulinum Spo0A, some of these interactions have been lost.