eIF4G, eIFiso4G, and eIF4B bind the poly(A)-binding protein through overlapping sites within the RNA recognition motif domains

Eukaryotic initiation factors eIF4F and eIF4B promote translation termination upon closed-loop formation

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), comprising subunits eIF4G, eIF4E, and eIF4A, plays a pivotal role in the 48S preinitiation complex assembly and ribosomal scanning. Additionally, eIF4B enhances the helicase activity of eIF4A. eIF4F also interacts with poly (A)-binding protein (PABP) bound to the poly (A) tail of messenger RNA (mRNA), thereby forming a closed-loop structure. PABP, in turn, interacts with eukaryotic release factor 3 (eRF3), stimulating translation termination. Here, we employed a reconstituted mammalian system to directly demonstrate that eIF4F potently enhances translation termination. Specifically, eIF4A and eIF4B promote the loading of eRF1 into the A site of the ribosome, while eIF4G1 stimulates the GTPase activity of eRF3 and facilitates the dissociation of release factors following peptide release. We also identified MIF4G as the minimal domain required for this activity and showed that eIF4G2/DAP5 can also promote termination. Our findings provide compelling evidence that the closed-loop mRNA structure facilitates translation termination, with PABP and eIF4F directly involved in this process.

Translation regulation in response to stress

Cell stresses occur in a wide variety of settings: in disease, during industrial processes, and as part of normal day-to-day rhythms. Adaptation to these stresses requires cells to alter their proteome. Cells modify the proteins they synthesize to aid proteome adaptation. Changes in both mRNA transcription and translation contribute to altered protein synthesis. Here, we discuss the changes in translational mechanisms that occur following the onset of stress, and the impact these have on stress adaptation.

Poly(A)-binding protein promotes VPg-dependent translation of potyvirus through enhanced binding of phosphorylated eIFiso4F and eIFiso4F∙eIF4B

The phosphorylation of eukaryotic translational initiation factors has been shown to play a significant role in controlling the synthesis of protein. Viral infection, environmental stress, and growth circumstances cause phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of plant initiation factors. Our findings indicate that casein kinase 2 can phosphorylate recombinant wheat eIFiso4E and eIFiso4G generated from E. coli in vitro. For wheat eIFiso4E, Ser-207 was found to be the in vitro phosphorylation site. eIFiso4E lacks an amino acid that can be phosphorylated at the position corresponding to Ser-209, the phosphorylation site in mammalian eIF4E, yet phosphorylation of eIFiso4E has effects on VPg binding affinity that are similar to those of phosphorylation of mammalian eIF4E. The addition of VPg and phosphorylated eIFiso4F to depleted wheat germ extract (WGE) leads to enhancement of translation of both uncapped and capped viral mRNA. The addition of PABP together with eIFiso4Fp and eIF4B to depleted WGE increases both uncapped and capped mRNA translation. However, it exhibits a translational advantage specifically for uncapped mRNA, implying that the phosphorylation of eIFiso4F hinders cap binding while promoting VPg binding, thereby facilitating uncapped translation. These findings indicate TEV virus mediates VPg-dependent translation by engaging a mechanism entailing phosphorylated eIFiso4Fp and PABP. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying these observed effects, we studied the impact of PABP and/or eIF4B on the binding of VPg with eIFiso4Fp. The inclusion of PABP and eIF4B with eIFiso4Fp resulted in about 2-fold increase in affinity for VPg (Kd = 24 ± 1.7 nM), as compared to the affinity of eIFiso4Fp alone (Kd = 41.0 ± 3.1 nM). The interactions between VPg and eIFiso4Fp were determined to be both enthalpically and entropically favorable, with the enthalpic contribution accounting for 76-97% of the ΔG at 25°C, indicating a substantial role of hydrogen bonding in enhancing the stability of the complex. The binding of PABP to eIFiso4Fp·4B resulted in a conformational alteration, leading to a significant enhancement in the binding affinity to VPg. These observations suggest PABP enhances the affinity between eIFiso4Fp and VPg, leading to an overall conformational change that provides a stable platform for efficient viral translation.

Embryonic poly(A)-binding protein interacts with translation-related proteins and undergoes phosphorylation on the serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues in the mouse oocytes and early embryos

Expression of the embryonic poly(A)-binding protein (EPAB) in frog, mouse, and human oocytes and early-stage embryos is maintained at high levels until embryonic genome activation (EGA) after which a significant decrease occurs in EPAB levels. Studies on the vertebrate oocytes and early embryos revealed that EPAB plays key roles in the translational regulation, stabilization, and protection of maternal mRNAs during oocyte maturation and early embryogenesis. However, it remains elusive whether EPAB interacts with other cellular proteins and undergoes phosphorylation to perform these roles. For this purpose, we identified a group of Epab-interacting proteins and its phosphorylation status in mouse germinal vesicle (GV)- and metaphase II (MII)-stage oocytes, and in 1-cell, 2-cell, and 4-cell preimplantation embryos. In the oocytes and early preimplantation embryos, Epab-interacting proteins were found to play roles in the translation and transcription processes, intracellular signaling and transport, maintenance of structural integrity, metabolism, posttranslational modifications, and chromatin remodeling. Moreover, we discovered that Epab undergoes phosphorylation on the serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues, which are localized in the RNA recognition motifs 2, 3, and 4 or C-terminal. Conclusively, these findings suggest that Epab not only functions in the translational control of maternal mRNAs through binding to their poly(A) tails but also participates in various cellular events through interacting with certain group proteins. Most likely, Epab undergoes a dynamic phosphorylation during the oocyte maturation and the early embryo development to carry out these functions.

Energy and sugar signaling during hypoxia

The major consequence of hypoxia is a dramatic reduction in energy production. At the onset of hypoxia, both oxygen and ATP availability decrease. Oxygen and energy sensing therefore converge to induce an adaptive response at both the transcriptional and translational levels. Oxygen sensing results in stabilization of the transcription factors that activate hypoxia-response genes, including enzymes required for efficient sugar metabolism, allowing plants to produce enough energy to ensure survival. The translation of the resulting mRNAs is mediated by SnRK1, acting as an energy sensor. However, as soon as the sugar availability decreases, a homeostatic mechanism, detecting sugar starvation, dampens the hypoxia-dependent transcription to reduce energy consumption and preserves carbon reserves for regrowth when oxygen availability is restored.

Crystal Structure of a Variant PAM2 Motif of LARP4B Bound to the MLLE Domain of PABPC1

Eukaryotic cells determine the protein output of their genetic program by regulating mRNA transcription, localization, translation and turnover rates. This regulation is accomplished by an ensemble of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that bind to any given mRNA, thus forming mRNPs. Poly(A) binding proteins (PABPs) are prominent members of virtually all mRNPs that possess poly(A) tails. They serve as multifunctional scaffolds, allowing the recruitment of diverse factors containing a poly(A)-interacting motif (PAM) into mRNPs. We present the crystal structure of the variant PAM motif (termed PAM2w) in the N-terminal part of the positive translation factor LARP4B, which binds to the MLLE domain of the poly(A) binding protein C1 cytoplasmic 1 (PABPC1). The structural analysis, along with mutational studies in vitro and in vivo, uncovered a new mode of interaction between PAM2 motifs and MLLE domains.

O-GlcNAcylation of core components of the translation initiation machinery regulates protein synthesis

Protein synthesis is essential for cell growth, proliferation, and survival. Protein synthesis is a tightly regulated process that involves multiple mechanisms. Deregulation of protein synthesis is considered as a key factor in the development and progression of a number of diseases, such as cancer. Here we show that the dynamic modification of proteins by O-linked β-N-acetyl-glucosamine (O-GlcNAcylation) regulates translation initiation by modifying core initiation factors eIF4A and eIF4G, respectively. Mechanistically, site-specific O-GlcNAcylation of eIF4A on Ser322/323 disrupts the formation of the translation initiation complex by perturbing its interaction with eIF4G. In addition, O-GlcNAcylation inhibits the duplex unwinding activity of eIF4A, leading to impaired protein synthesis, and decreased cell proliferation. In contrast, site-specific O-GlcNAcylation of eIF4G on Ser61 promotes its interaction with poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) and poly(A) mRNA. Depletion of eIF4G O-GlcNAcylation results in inhibition of protein synthesis, cell proliferation, and soft agar colony formation. The differential glycosylation of eIF4A and eIF4G appears to be regulated in the initiation complex to fine-tune protein synthesis. Our study thus expands the current understanding of protein synthesis, and adds another dimension of complexity to translational control of cellular proteins.

The SnRK1-eIFiso4G1 signaling relay regulates the translation of specific mRNAs in Arabidopsis under submergence

Cellular responses to oxygen deprivation are essential for survival during energy crises in plants and animals. Hypoxia caused by submergence results in reprogramming of translation dynamic in plants, but the molecular mechanisms are not well understood. Here we show that Arabidopsis Snf1-related protein kinase 1 (SnRK1) phosphorylates the translation initiation factor eIFiso4G to regulate translation dynamic under submergence. In Arabidopsis, there are two eIFiso4G genes, eIFiso4G1 and eIFiso4G2, which belong to the eIF4G family. Both eIFiso4Gs were phosphorylated by SnRK1 under submergence. Interestingly, the eIFiso4G1 knockout mutant, but not the eIFiso4G2 mutant, became more sensitive to submergence, implying that eIFiso4G1 is involved in regulating submergence tolerance in Arabidopsis. Comparison of RNA sequences in the polysome fraction and the RNAs immunoprecipitated by eIFiso4G1 from Col-0 and the SnRK1 and eIFiso4G1 mutants revealed that lack of eIFiso4G1 phosphorylation disrupts the translation of specific mRNAs under submergence. Taken together, our findings suggest that the SnRK1-eIFiso4G1 relay controls the translation of an array of genes under hypoxia, including core hypoxia response genes and genes related to stress response and biosynthetic process.

Phosphorylation and interactions associated with the control of the Leishmania Poly-A Binding Protein 1 (PABP1) function during translation initiation

The Poly-A Binding Protein (PABP) is a conserved eukaryotic polypeptide involved in many aspects of mRNA metabolism. During translation initiation, PABP interacts with the translation initiation complex eIF4F and enhances the translation of polyadenylated mRNAs. Schematically, most PABPs can be divided into an N-terminal RNA-binding region, a non-conserved linker segment and the C-terminal MLLE domain. In pathogenic Leishmania protozoans, three PABP homologues have been identified, with the first one (PABP1) targeted by phosphorylation and shown to co-immunoprecipitate with an eIF4F-like complex (EIF4E4/EIF4G3) implicated in translation initiation. Here, PABP1 phosphorylation was shown to be linked to logarithmic cell growth, reminiscent of EIF4E4 phosphorylation, and coincides with polysomal association. Phosphorylation targets multiple serine-proline (SP) or threonine-proline (TP) residues within the PABP1 linker region. This is an essential protein, but phosphorylation is not needed for its association with polysomes or cell viability. Mutations which do impair PABP1 polysomal association and are required for viability do not prevent phosphorylation, although further mutations lead to a presumed inactive protein largely lacking phosphorylated isoforms. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out to investigate PABP1 function further, identifying several novel protein partners and the EIF4E4/EIF4G3 complex, but no other eIF4F-like complex or subunit. A novel, direct interaction between PABP1 and EIF4E4 was also investigated and found to be mediated by the PABP1 MLLE binding to PABP Interacting Motifs (PAM2) within the EIF4E4 N-terminus. The results shown here are consistent with phosphorylation of PABP1 being part of a novel pathway controlling its function and possibly translation in Leishmania.

The molecular choreography of protein synthesis: translational control, regulation, and pathways

Translation of proteins by the ribosome regulates gene expression, with recent results underscoring the importance of translational control. Misregulation of translation underlies many diseases, including cancer and many genetic diseases. Decades of biochemical and structural studies have delineated many of the mechanistic details in prokaryotic translation, and sketched the outlines of eukaryotic translation. However, translation may not proceed linearly through a single mechanistic pathway, but likely involves multiple pathways and branchpoints. The stochastic nature of biological processes would allow different pathways to occur during translation that are biased by the interaction of the ribosome with other translation factors, with many of the steps kinetically controlled. These multiple pathways and branchpoints are potential regulatory nexus, allowing gene expression to be tuned at the translational level. As research focus shifts toward eukaryotic translation, certain themes will be echoed from studies on prokaryotic translation. This review provides a general overview of the dynamic data related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic translation, in particular recent findings with single-molecule methods, complemented by biochemical, kinetic, and structural findings. We will underscore the importance of viewing the process through the viewpoints of regulation, translational control, and heterogeneous pathways.

Eukaryotic Initiation Factor eIFiso4G1 and eIFiso4G2 Are Isoforms Exhibiting Distinct Functional Differences in Supporting Translation in Arabidopsis

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4G is required during protein synthesis to promote the assembly of several factors involved in the recruitment of a 40S ribosomal subunit to an mRNA. Although many eukaryotes express two eIF4G isoforms that are highly similar, the eIF4G isoforms in plants, referred to as eIF4G and eIFiso4G, are highly divergent in size, sequence, and domain organization but both can interact with eIF4A, eIF4B, eIF4E isoforms, and the poly(A)-binding protein. Nevertheless, eIF4G and eIFiso4G from wheat exhibit preferences in the mRNAs they translate optimally. For example, mRNA containing the 5'-leader (called Ω) of tobacco mosaic virus preferentially uses eIF4G in wheat germ lysate. In this study, the eIF4G isoform specificity of Ω was used to examine functional differences of the eIF4G isoforms in Arabidopsis. As in wheat, Ω-mediated translation was reduced in an eif4g null mutant. Loss of the eIFiso4G1 isoform, which is similar in sequence to wheat eIFiso4G, did not substantially affect Ω-mediated translation. However, loss of the eIFiso4G2 isoform substantially reduced Ω-mediated translation. eIFiso4G2 is substantially divergent from eIFiso4G1 and is present only in the Brassicaceae, suggesting a recent evolution. eIFiso4G2 isoforms exhibit sequence-specific differences in regions representing partner protein and RNA binding sites. Loss of any eIF4G isoform also resulted in a substantial reduction in reporter transcript level. These results suggest that eIFiso4G2 appeared late in plant evolution and exhibits more functional similarity with eIF4G than with eIFiso4G1 during Ω-mediated translation.

Mechanism of cytoplasmic mRNA translation

Protein synthesis is a fundamental process in gene expression that depends upon the abundance and accessibility of the mRNA transcript as well as the activity of many protein and RNA-protein complexes. Here we focus on the intricate mechanics of mRNA translation in the cytoplasm of higher plants. This chapter includes an inventory of the plant translational apparatus and a detailed review of the translational processes of initiation, elongation, and termination. The majority of mechanistic studies of cytoplasmic translation have been carried out in yeast and mammalian systems. The factors and mechanisms of translation are for the most part conserved across eukaryotes; however, some distinctions are known to exist in plants. A comprehensive understanding of the complex translational apparatus and its regulation in plants is warranted, as the modulation of protein production is critical to development, environmental plasticity and biomass yield in diverse ecosystems and agricultural settings.

Phylogenetic analysis reveals dynamic evolution of the poly(A)-binding protein gene family in plants

Background

The poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) binds the poly(A) tail of eukaryotic mRNAs and functions to maintain the integrity of the mRNA while promoting protein synthesis through its interaction with eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4G and eIF4B. PABP is encoded by a single gene in yeast and marine algae but during plant evolution the PABP gene family expanded substantially, underwent sequence divergence into three subclasses, and acquired tissue-specificity in gene family member expression. Although such changes suggest functional specialization, the size of the family and its sequence divergence have complicated an understanding of which gene family members may be foundational and which may represent more recent expansions of the family to meet the specific needs of speciation. Here, we examine the evolution of the plant PABP gene family to provide insight into these aspects of the family that may yield clues into the function of individual family members.

Results

The PABP gene family had expanded to two members by the appearance of fresh water algae and four members in non-vascular plants. In lycophytes, the first sequence divergence yielding a specific class member occurs. The earliest members of the gene family share greatest similarity to those modern members whose expression is confined to reproductive tissues, suggesting that supporting reproductive-associated gene expression is the most conserved function of this family. A family member sharing similarity to modern vegetative-associated members first appears in gymnosperms. Further elaboration of the reproductive-associated and vegetative-associated members occurred during the evolution of flowering plants.

Conclusions

Expansion of the plant PABP gene family began prior to the colonization of land. By the evolution of lycophytes, the first class member whose expression is confined to reproductive tissues in higher plants had appeared. A second class member whose expression is vegetative-associated appeared in gymnosperms and all three modern classes had fully evolved by the appearance of the first known basal angiosperm. The size of each PABP class underwent further expansion during subsequent evolution, especially in the Brassicaceae, suggesting that the family is undergoing dynamic evolution.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-014-0238-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The role of the poly(A) binding protein in the assembly of the Cap-binding complex during translation initiation in plants

Translation initiation in eukaryotes requires the involvement of multiple initiation factors (eIFs) that facilitate the binding of the 40 S ribosomal subunit to an mRNA and assemble the 80 S ribosome at the correct initiation codon. eIF4F, composed of eIF4E, eIF4A, and eIF4G, binds to the 5'-cap structure of an mRNA and prepares an mRNA for recruitment of a 40 S subunit. eIF4B promotes the ATP-dependent RNA helicase activity of eIF4A and eIF4F needed to unwind secondary structure present in a 5'-leader that would otherwise impede scanning of the 40 S subunit during initiation. The poly(A) binding protein (PABP), which binds the poly(A) tail, interacts with eIF4G and eIF4B to promote circularization of an mRNA and stimulates translation by promoting 40 S subunit recruitment. Thus, these factors serve essential functions in the early steps of protein synthesis. Their assembly and function requires multiple interactions that are competitive in nature and determine the nature of interactions between the termini of an mRNA. In this review, the domain organization and partner protein interactions are presented for the factors in plants which share similarities with those in animals and yeast but differ in several important respects. The functional consequences of their interactions on factor activity are also discussed.

Insights from a Paradigm Shift: How the Poly(A)-Binding Protein Brings Translating mRNAs Full Circle

In recent years, our thinking of how the initiation of protein synthesis occurs has changed dramatically. Initiation was thought to involve only events occurring at or near the 5′-cap structure, which serves as the binding site for the cap-binding complex, a group of translation initiation factors (eIFs) that facilitate the binding of the 40 S ribosomal subunit to an mRNA. Because the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) binds the poly(A) tail present at the 3′-terminus of an mRNA, it was long thought to play no role in translation initiation. In this review, I present evidence from my laboratory that has contributed to the paradigm shift in how we think of mRNAs during translation. The depiction of mRNAs as straight molecules in which the poly(A) tail is far from events occurring at the 5′-end has now been replaced by the concept of a circular mRNA where the interaction between PABP and the cap-binding complex bridges the termini of an mRNA and promotes translation initiation. The research from my laboratory supports the new paradigm that translation of most mRNAs requires a functional and physical interaction between the termini of an mRNA.

Specificity factors in cytoplasmic polyadenylation

Poly(A) tail elongation after export of an messenger RNA (mRNA) to the cytoplasm is called cytoplasmic polyadenylation. It was first discovered in oocytes and embryos, where it has roles in meiosis and development. In recent years, however, has been implicated in many other processes, including synaptic plasticity and mitosis. This review aims to introduce cytoplasmic polyadenylation with an emphasis on the factors and elements mediating this process for different mRNAs and in different animal species. We will discuss the RNA sequence elements mediating cytoplasmic polyadenylation in the 3' untranslated regions of mRNAs, including the CPE, MBE, TCS, eCPE, and C-CPE. In addition to describing the role of general polyadenylation factors, we discuss the specific RNA binding protein families associated with cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements, including CPEB (CPEB1, CPEB2, CPEB3, and CPEB4), Pumilio (PUM2), Musashi (MSI1, MSI2), zygote arrest (ZAR2), ELAV like proteins (ELAVL1, HuR), poly(C) binding proteins (PCBP2, αCP2, hnRNP-E2), and Bicaudal C (BICC1). Some emerging themes in cytoplasmic polyadenylation will be highlighted. To facilitate understanding for those working in different organisms and fields, particularly those who are analyzing high throughput data, HUGO gene nomenclature for the human orthologs is used throughout. Where human orthologs have not been clearly identified, reference is made to protein families identified in man.

Translational Regulation of Cytoplasmic mRNAs

Translation of the coding potential of a messenger RNA into a protein molecule is a fundamental process in all living cells and consumes a large fraction of metabolites and energy resources in growing cells. Moreover, translation has emerged as an important control point in the regulation of gene expression. At the level of gene regulation, translational control is utilized to support the specific life histories of plants, in particular their responses to the abiotic environment and to metabolites. This review summarizes the diversity of translational control mechanisms in the plant cytoplasm, focusing on specific cases where mechanisms of translational control have evolved to complement or eclipse other levels of gene regulation. We begin by introducing essential features of the translation apparatus. We summarize early evidence for translational control from the pre-Arabidopsis era. Next, we review evidence for translation control in response to stress, to metabolites, and in development. The following section emphasizes RNA sequence elements and biochemical processes that regulate translation. We close with a chapter on the role of signaling pathways that impinge on translation.

Eukaryotic initiation factor 4B and the poly(A)-binding protein bind eIF4G competitively

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4G functions as a scaffold protein that assembles components of the translation initiation complex required to recruit the 40S ribosomal subunit to an mRNA. Although many eukaryotes express two highly similar eIF4G isoforms, those in plants are highly divergent in size and sequence from one another and are referred to as eIF4G and eIFiso4G. Although the domain organization of eIFiso4G differs substantially from eIF4G orthologs in other species, the domain organization of plant eIF4G is largely unknown despite the fact that it is more similar in size and sequence to eIF4G of other eukaryotes. In this study, we show that eIF4G differs from eIFiso4G in that it contains two distinct interaction domains for the poly(A) binding protein (PABP) and eIF4B but is similar to eIFiso4G in having two eIF4A interaction domains. PABP and eIF4B bind the same N-terminal region of eIF4G as they do to a region C-proximal to the HEAT-1 domain in the middle domain of eIF4G, resulting in competitive binding between eIF4B and PABP to each site. eIF4G also differs from eIFiso4G in that no competitive binding was observed between PABP and eIF4A or between eIF4B and eIF4A to its HEAT-1-containing region. These results demonstrate that despite substantial differences in size, sequence, and domain organization, PABP and eIF4B bind to eIF4G and eIFiso4G competitively.

Evolutionary conservation and diversification of the translation initiation apparatus in trypanosomatids

Trypanosomatids are ancient eukaryotic parasites that migrate between insect vectors and mammalian hosts, causing a range of diseases in humans and domestic animals. Trypanosomatids feature a multitude of unusual molecular features, including polycistronic transcription and subsequent processing by trans-splicing and polyadenylation. Regulation of protein coding genes is posttranscriptional and thus, translation regulation is fundamental for activating the developmental program of gene expression. The spliced-leader RNA is attached to all mRNAs. It contains an unusual hypermethylated cap-4 structure in its 5′ end. The cap-binding complex, eIF4F, has gone through evolutionary changes in accordance with the requirement to bind cap-4. The eIF4F components in trypanosomatids are highly diverged from their orthologs in higher eukaryotes, and their potential functions are discussed. The cap-binding activity in all eukaryotes is a target for regulation and plays a similar role in trypanosomatids. Recent studies revealed a novel eIF4E-interacting protein, involved in directing stage-specific and stress-induced translation pathways. Translation regulation during stress also follows unusual regulatory cues, as the increased translation of Hsp83 following heat stress is driven by a defined element in the 3′ UTR, unlike higher eukaryotes. Overall, the environmental switches experienced by trypanosomatids during their life cycle seem to affect their translational machinery in unique ways.

Poly(A)-binding protein facilitates translation of an uncapped/nonpolyadenylated viral RNA by binding to the 3' untranslated region

Viruses employ an alternative translation mechanism to exploit cellular resources at the expense of host mRNAs and to allow preferential translation. Plant RNA viruses often lack both a 5' cap and a 3' poly(A) tail in their genomic RNAs. Instead, cap-independent translation enhancer elements (CITEs) located in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) mediate their translation. Although eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) or ribosomes have been shown to bind to the 3'CITEs, our knowledge is still limited for the mechanism, especially for cellular factors. Here, we searched for cellular factors that stimulate the 3'CITE-mediated translation of Red clover necrotic mosaic virus (RCNMV) RNA1 using RNA aptamer-based one-step affinity chromatography, followed by mass spectrometry analysis. We identified the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) as one of the key players in the 3'CITE-mediated translation of RCNMV RNA1. We found that PABP binds to an A-rich sequence (ARS) in the viral 3' UTR. The ARS is conserved among dianthoviruses. Mutagenesis and a tethering assay revealed that the PABP-ARS interaction stimulates 3'CITE-mediated translation of RCNMV RNA1. We also found that both the ARS and 3'CITE are important for the recruitment of the plant eIF4F and eIFiso4F factors to the 3' UTR and of the 40S ribosomal subunit to the viral mRNA. Our results suggest that dianthoviruses have evolved the ARS and 3'CITE as substitutes for the 3' poly(A) tail and the 5' cap of eukaryotic mRNAs for the efficient recruitment of eIFs, PABP, and ribosomes to the uncapped/nonpolyadenylated viral mRNA.

Poly(A)-binding protein increases the binding affinity and kinetic rates of interaction of viral protein linked to genome with translation initiation factors eIFiso4F and eIFiso4F·4B complex

VPg of turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) was previously shown to interact with translation initiation factor eIFiso4F and play an important role in mRNA translation [Khan, M. A., et al. (2008) J. Biol. Chem.283, 1340-1349]. VPg competed with cap analogue for eIFiso4F binding and competitively inhibited cap-dependent translation and enhanced cap-independent translation to give viral RNA a significant competitive advantage. To gain further insight into the cap-independent process of initiation of protein synthesis, we examined the effect of PABP and/or eIF4B on the equilibrium and kinetics of binding of VPg to eIFiso4F. Equilibrium data showed the addition of PABP and/or eIF4B to eIFiso4F increased the binding affinity for VPg (K(d) = 24.3 ± 1.6 nM) as compared to that with eIFiso4F alone (K(d) = 81.3 ± 0.2.4 nM). Thermodynamic parameters showed that binding of VPg to eIFiso4F was enthalpy-driven and entropy-favorable with the addition of PABP and/or eIF4B. PABP and eIF4B decreased the entropic contribution by 67% for binding of VPg to eIFiso4F. The decrease in entropy involved in the formation of the eIFiso4F·4B·PABP-VPg complex suggested weakened hydrophobic interactions for complex formation and an overall conformational change. The kinetic studies of eIFiso4F with VPg in the presence of PABP and eIF4B show 3-fold faster association (k(2) = 182 ± 9.0 s(-1)) compared to that with eIFiso4F alone (k(2) = 69.0 ± 1.5 s(-1)) . The dissociation rate was 3-fold slower (k(-2) = 6.5 ± 0.43 s(-1)) for eIFiso4F with VPg in the presence of PABP and eIF4B (k(-2) = 19.0 ± 0.9 s(-1)). The addition of PABP and eIF4B decreased the activation energy of eIFiso4F with VPg from 81.0 ± 3.0 to 44.0 ± 2.4 kJ/mol. This suggests that the presence of both proteins leads to a rapid, stable complex, which serves to sequester initiation factors.

Identification and bioinformatics characterization of translation initiation complex eIF4F components and poly(A)-binding protein from Plasmodium falciparum

Protein synthesis in eukaryotes initiates with binding of the multisubunit translation initiation complex eIF4F. This complex contains eIF4E, eIF4A and eIF4G. eIF4E directly interacts with the cap structure, eIF4A is an RNA helicase and eIF4G acts as a scaffold for the complex. eIF4G contains the binding sites for both the subunits i.e., eIF4A and eIF4E and it also interacts with poly(A)-binding protein (PABP). In present study we have identified and characterized the main components of the eIF4F complex i.e., eIF4E, eIF4A and eIF4G and PABP from Plasmodium falciparum. Molecular modeling of PfeIF4E, PfeIF4G and PfPABP confirms that they contain all the characteristic conserved structural features. We have annotated some of the genes of P. falciparum and as a result these studies demonstrate that the components of translation initiation complex are highly conserved. Therefore these studies will contribute to understand the basic biology and components of translation complex in P. falciparum.

Competitive and noncompetitive binding of eIF4B, eIF4A, and the poly(A) binding protein to wheat translation initiation factor eIFiso4G

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) functions to organize the assembly of initiation factors required for the recruitment of a 40S ribosomal subunit to an mRNA and for interacting with the poly(A) binding protein (PABP). Many eukaryotes express two highly similar eIF4G isoforms. eIFiso4G, one of two isoforms in plants, is highly divergent and unusually small in size. Unlike animal and yeast eIF4G, the domain organization of plant eIF4G proteins is largely unknown. Consequently, little is known about the conservation of plant eIF4G with those in other eukaryotes. In this study, we show that eIFiso4G is similar to other eIF4G proteins in that there are interaction domains for eIF4A and PABP and we identify, for the first time, the interaction domain for eIF4B. In contrast to previous reports, two eIF4A binding domains in eIFiso4G were identified, similar in number and organization to those of animal eIF4G. The eIFiso4G domain organization does differ, however, in that the N-terminal eIF4A binding domain overlaps with the eIF4B and PABP binding domains. Moreover, the eIF4B and PABP binding domains overlap. PABP and eIF4B compete with eIF4A for binding eIFiso4G in the absence of the C-terminal eIF4A binding domain but not when both eIF4A binding domains are present, suggesting that the C-terminal eIF4A interaction domain functions to stabilize the association of eIF4A with eIFiso4G in the presence of eIF4B or PABP. Competitive binding to eIFiso4G was also observed between eIF4B and PABP. These observations reveal an important function of the C-terminal eIF4A binding domain in maintaining the interaction of multiple partner proteins with eIFiso4G despite the substantial divergence in its size and domain organization.

Functional characterization of three leishmania poly(a) binding protein homologues with distinct binding properties to RNA and protein partners

Trypanosomatid protozoans are reliant on posttranscriptional processes to control gene expression. Regulation occurs at the levels of mRNA processing, stability, and translation, events that may require the participation of the poly(A) binding protein (PABP). Here, we have undertaken a functional study of the three distinct Leishmania major PABP (LmPABP) homologues: the previously described LmPABP1; LmPABP2, orthologous to the PABP described from Trypanosoma species; and LmPABP3, unique to Leishmania. Sequence identity between the three PABPs is no greater than 40%. In assays measuring binding to A-rich sequences, LmPABP1 binding was poly(A) sensitive but heparin insensitive; LmPABP2 binding was heparin sensitive and less sensitive to poly(A), compatible with unique substitutions observed in residues implicated in poly(A) binding; and LmPABP3 displayed intermediate properties. All three homologues are simultaneously expressed as abundant cytoplasmic proteins in L. major promastigotes, but only LmPABP1 is present as multiple isoforms. Upon transcription inhibition, LmPABP2 and -3 migrated to the nucleus, while LmPABP1 remained predominantly cytoplasmic. Immunoprecipitation assays showed an association between LmPABP2 and -3. Although the three proteins bound to a Leishmania homologue of the translation initiation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) (LmEIF4G3) in vitro, LmPABP1 was the only one to copurify with native LmEIF4G3 from cytoplasmic extracts. Functionality was tested using RNA interference (RNAi) in Trypanosoma brucei, where both orthologues to LmPABP1 and -2 are required for cellular viability. Our results indicate that these homologues have evolved divergent functions, some of which may be unique to the trypanosomatids, and reinforces a role for LmPABP1 in translation through its interaction with the eIF4G homologue.

Poly(A) tail affects equilibrium and thermodynamic behavior of tobacco etch virus mRNA with translation initiation factors eIF4F, eIF4B and PABP

We have investigated the effects of poly(A)-tail on binding of eIF4F, eIF4B and PABP with tobacco etch virus (TEV) IRES RNA. The fluorescence anisotropy data showed that the addition of poly(A)(20) increases the binding affinity of eIF4F·4B and eIF4F·PABP complexes to IRES RNA ~2- and 4-fold, respectively. However, the binding affinity of eIF4F with PK1 was enhanced ~11-fold with the addition of PABP, eIF4B, and poly(A)(20) together. Whereas, poly(A)(20) alone increases the binding affinity of eIF4F·4B·PABP with PK1 RNA about 3-fold, showing an additive effect rather than the large increase in affinity as shown for cap binding. Thermodynamic data showed that PK1 RNA binding to protein complexes in the presence of poly(A)(20) was enthalpy-driven and entropy-favorable. Poly(A)(20) decreased the entropic contribution 75% for binding of PK1 RNA to eIF4F·4B·PABP as compared to eIF4F alone, suggesting reduced hydrophobic interactions for complex formation and an overall conformational change. Overall, these results demonstrate the first direct effect of poly(A) on the equilibrium and thermodynamics of eIF4F and eIF4F·4B·PABP with IRES-RNA.

Expression of oestrogen receptor beta isoforms is regulated by transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms

Although ERs (oestrogen receptors) mediate breast tumour behaviour, the precise role of ERbeta remains unclear. This is mainly because analyses have been complicated by the presence in breast tissue of three ERbeta protein variants (ERbeta1, ERbeta2 and ERbeta5) that derive from differential 3' splicing. We have recently identified the first known mechanisms responsible for the differential control of isoform expression, involving regulation of translation via 5'-UTRs (untranslated regions). In the present study, we have uncovered further complexity involving the influence of multiple promoters and cross-talk between 5'- and 3'-UTRs. We demonstrate that full-length ERbeta mRNAs are transcribed from three separate promoters; two promoters are well-established within the literature, whereas the third represents a novel finding. Each promoter produces transcripts with distinct 5'-UTRs. The differential 3' splicing that produces transcripts coding for the ERbeta isoforms also defines isoform-specific 3'-UTRs. We identified exact 3'-UTR sequences for each isoform, and have shown that alternative polyadenylation sites are used in a cell-type specific manner to produce transcripts with 3'-UTRs of different lengths. Critically, we show that 5'- and 3'-UTRs combine to specify the efficiencies with which individual transcripts are translated, with 3'-UTR length having a key influence. In addition, we demonstrate how 17beta-oestradiol, a key driver of breast cancer development, affects the regulation of ERbeta expression at both transcriptional and translational levels.

Energy signaling in the regulation of gene expression during stress

Maintenance of homeostasis is pivotal to all forms of life. In the case of plants, homeostasis is constantly threatened by the inability to escape environmental fluctuations, and therefore sensitive mechanisms must have evolved to allow rapid perception of environmental cues and concomitant modification of growth and developmental patterns for adaptation and survival. Re-establishment of homeostasis in response to environmental perturbations requires reprogramming of metabolism and gene expression to shunt energy sources from growth-related biosynthetic processes to defense, acclimation, and, ultimately, adaptation. Failure to mount an initial 'emergency' response may result in nutrient deprivation and irreversible senescence and cell death. Early signaling events largely determine the capacity of plants to orchestrate a successful adaptive response. Early events, on the other hand, are likely to be shared by different conditions through the generation of similar signals and before more specific responses are elaborated. Recent studies lend credence to this hypothesis, underpinning the importance of a shared energy signal in the transcriptional response to various types of stress. Energy deficiency is associated with most environmental perturbations due to their direct or indirect deleterious impact on photosynthesis and/or respiration. Several systems are known to have evolved for monitoring the available resources and triggering metabolic, growth, and developmental decisions accordingly. In doing so, energy-sensing systems regulate gene expression at multiple levels to allow flexibility in the diversity and the kinetics of the stress response.

Kinetic mechanism for the binding of eIF4F and tobacco Etch virus internal ribosome entry site rna: effects of eIF4B and poly(A)-binding protein

The wheat germ eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4F binds tightly to the mRNA internal ribosome entry site (IRES) of tobacco etch virus (TEV) to promote translation initiation. When eIF4F is limiting, TEV is preferentially translated compared with host cell mRNA. To gain insight into the dynamic process of protein synthesis initiation and the mechanism of binding, the kinetics of eIF4F binding to TEV IRES were examined. The association rate constant (k(on)) and dissociation rate constant (k(off)) for eIF4F binding to IRES were 59 +/- 2.1 micro s(-1) and 12.9 +/- 0.3 s(-1), respectively, comparable with the rates for capped RNA. Binding of eIF4E or eIF4F to the cap of mRNA is the rate-limiting step for initiation of cap-dependent protein synthesis. The concentration dependence of the reactions suggested a simple one-step association mechanism. However, the association rate was reduced more than 10-fold when KCl concentration was increased from 50 to 300 mm, whereas the dissociation rate constant was increased 2-fold. The addition of eIF4B and poly(A)-binding protein enhanced the association rate of eIF4F approximately 3-fold. These results suggest a mechanism where eIF4F initially binds electrostatically, followed by a conformational change to further stabilize binding. Poly(A)-binding protein and eIF4B mainly affect the eIF4F/TEV association rate. These results demonstrate the first direct kinetic measurements of translation initiation factor binding to an IRES.

HIV- 1 protease inhibits Cap- and poly(A)-dependent translation upon eIF4GI and PABP cleavage

A number of viral proteases are able to cleave translation initiation factors leading to the inhibition of cellular translation. This is the case of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease (HIV-1 PR), which hydrolyzes eIF4GI and poly(A)-binding protein (PABP). Here, the effect of HIV-1 PR on cellular and viral protein synthesis has been examined using cell-free systems. HIV-1 PR strongly hampers translation of pre-existing capped luc mRNAs, particularly when these mRNAs contain a poly(A) tail. In fact, HIV-1 PR efficiently blocks cap- and poly(A)-dependent translation initiation in HeLa extracts. Addition of exogenous PABP to HIV-1 PR treated extracts partially restores the translation of polyadenylated luc mRNAs, suggesting that PABP cleavage is directly involved in the inhibition of poly(A)-dependent translation. In contrast to these data, PABP cleavage induced by HIV-1 PR has little impact on the translation of polyadenylated encephalomyocarditis virus internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-containing mRNAs. In this case, the loss of poly(A)-dependent translation is compensated by the IRES transactivation provided by eIF4G cleavage. Finally, translation of capped and polyadenylated HIV-1 genomic mRNA takes place in HeLa extracts when eIF4GI and PABP have been cleaved by HIV-1 PR. Together these results suggest that proteolytic cleavage of eIF4GI and PABP by HIV-1 PR blocks cap- and poly(A)-dependent initiation of translation, leading to the inhibition of cellular protein synthesis. However, HIV-1 genomic mRNA can be translated under these conditions, giving rise to the production of Gag polyprotein.

Translational control of eukaryotic gene expression

Translational control mechanisms are, besides transcriptional control and mRNA stability, the most determining for final protein levels. A large number of accessory factors that assist the ribosome during initiation, elongation, and termination of translation are required for protein synthesis. Cap-dependent translational control occurs mainly during the initiation step, involving eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) and accessory proteins. Initiation is affected by various stimuli that influence the phosphorylation status of both eIF4E and eIF2 and through binding of 4E-binding proteins to eIF4E, which finally inhibits cap- dependent translation. Under conditions where cap-dependent translation is hampered, translation of transcripts containing an internal ribosome entry site can still be supported in a cap-independent manner. An interesting example of translational control is the switch between cap-independent and cap-dependent translation during the eukaryotic cell cycle. At the G1-to-S transition, translation occurs predominantly in a cap-dependent manner, while during the G2-to-M transition, cap-dependent translation is inhibited and transcripts are predominantly translated through a cap-independent mechanism.

Host-dependent roles of the viral 5' untranslated region (UTR) in RNA stabilization and cap-independent translational enhancement mediated by the 3' UTR of Red clover necrotic mosaic virus RNA1

The genome of Red clover necrotic mosaic virus (RCNMV) consists of RNA1 and RNA2, both lacking a cap structure and a poly(A)tail. RNA1 has a translational enhancer element (3'TE-DR1) in the 3' untranslated region (UTR). In this study, we analyzed the roles of 5' and 3' UTRs of RNA1 in 3'TE-DR1-mediated cap-independent translation in cowpea and tobacco BY-2 protoplasts using a dual-luciferase (Luc) reporter assay system. Most mutations introduced into RNA1 5' UTR in reporter Luc mRNA abolished or greatly reduced cap-independent translation in BY-2 protoplasts, whereas those mutations had no or much milder effects if any on translational activity in cowpea protoplasts. Our results suggest that a stem-loop structure predicted in the 5' proximal region of RNA1 plays important roles in both translation and RNA stability. We also show that 3'TE-DR1-mediated cap-independent translation relies on a ribosome-scanning mechanism in both protoplasts.

Getting the message across: cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complexes

mRNA-ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) complexes mediate post-transcriptional control mechanisms in the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. Transcriptional control is paramount to gene expression but is followed by regulated nuclear pre-mRNA maturation and quality control processes that culminate in the export of a functional transcript to the cytoplasm. Once in the cytosol, mRNPs determine the activity of individual mRNAs through regulation of localization, translation, sequestration and turnover. Here, we review how quantitative assessment of mRNAs in distinct cytoplasmic mRNPs, such as polyribosomes (polysomes), has provided new perspectives on post-transcriptional regulation from the global to gene-specific level. In addition, we explore recent genetic and biochemical studies of cytoplasmic mRNPs that have begun to expose RNA-binding proteins in an integrated network that fine-tunes gene expression.

Translation initiation factor 4B homodimerization, RNA binding, and interaction with Poly(A)-binding protein are enhanced by zinc

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4B promotes the RNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis activity and ATP-dependent RNA helicase activity of eIF4A and eIF4F during translation initiation. eIF4B also helps to organize the assembly of the translational machinery through its interactions with eIF4A, eIF4G, eIF3, the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP), and RNA. Although the function of eIF4B is conserved among plants, animals, and yeast, eIF4B is one of the least conserved of initiation factors at the sequence level. Mammalian eIF4B is a constitutive dimer; however, conflicting reports have suggested that plant eIF4B may exist as a monomer or a dimer. In this study, we show that eIF4B from wheat can form a dimer and we identify the region responsible for its dimerization. Zinc stimulated homodimerization of eIF4B and bound eIF4B with a Kd of 19.7 nM. Zinc increased the activity of the eIF4B C-terminal RNA-binding domain specifically. Zinc promoted the interaction between eIF4B and PABP but not the interaction between eIF4B and eIF4A or eIFiso4G, demonstrating that the effect of zinc was highly specific. The interaction between PABP and eIFiso4G was also stimulated by zinc but required significantly higher levels of zinc. Interestingly zinc abolished the ability of eIFiso4G to compete with eIF4B in binding to their overlapping binding sites in PABP by preferentially promoting the interaction between eIF4B and PABP. Our observations suggest that wheat eIF4B can dimerize but requires zinc. Moreover zinc controls the partner protein selection of PABP such that the interaction with eIF4B is preferred over eIFiso4G.