The initiator core promoter element antagonizes repression of TATA-directed transcription by negative cofactor NC2

Transcription start site heterogeneity and its role in RNA fate determination distinguish HIV-1 from other retroviruses and are mediated by core promoter elements

HIV-1 uses heterogeneous transcription start sites (TSSs) to generate two RNA 5´ isoforms that adopt radically different structures and perform distinct replication functions. Although these RNAs differ in length by only two bases, exclusively, the shorter RNA is encapsidated while the longer RNA is excluded from virions and provides intracellular functions. The current study examined TSS usage and packaging selectivity for a broad range of retroviruses and found that heterogeneous TSS usage was a conserved feature of all tested HIV-1 strains, but all other retroviruses examined displayed unique TSSs. Phylogenetic comparisons and chimeric viruses' properties provided evidence that this mechanism of RNA fate determination was an innovation of the HIV-1 lineage, with determinants mapping to core promoter elements. Fine-tuning differences between HIV-1 and HIV-2, which uses a unique TSS, implicated purine residue positioning plus a specific TSS-adjacent dinucleotide in specifying multiplicity of TSS usage. Based on these findings, HIV-1 expression constructs were generated that differed from the parental strain by only two point mutations yet each expressed only one of HIV-1's two RNAs. Replication defects of the variant with only the presumptive founder TSS were less severe than those for the virus with only the secondary start site. IMPORTANCE Retroviruses use RNA both to encode their proteins and to serve in place of DNA as their genomes. A recent surprising discovery was that the genomic RNAs and messenger RNAs of HIV-1 are not identical but instead differ subtly on one of their ends. These differences enable the functional separation of HIV-1 RNAs into genome and messenger roles. In this report, we examined a broad collection of HIV-1-related viruses and discovered that each produced only one end class of RNA, and thus must differ from HIV-1 in how they specify RNA fates. By comparing regulatory signals, we generated virus variants that pinpointed the determinants of HIV-1 RNA fates, as well as HIV-1 variants that produced only one or the other functional class of RNA. Competition and replication assays confirmed that HIV-1 has evolved to rely on the coordinated actions of both its RNA forms.

ATAC and SAGA co-activator complexes utilize co-translational assembly, but their cellular localization properties and functions are distinct

To understand the function of multisubunit complexes, it is of key importance to uncover the precise mechanisms that guide their assembly. Nascent proteins can find and bind their interaction partners during their translation, leading to co-translational assembly. Here, we demonstrate that the core modules of ATAC (ADA-two-A-containing) and SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase), two lysine acetyl transferase-containing transcription co-activator complexes, assemble co-translationally in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. In addition, a SAGA complex containing all of its modules forms in the cytoplasm and acetylates non-histone proteins. In contrast, ATAC complex subunits cannot be detected in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. However, an endogenous ATAC complex containing two functional modules forms and functions in the nucleus. Thus, the two related co-activators, ATAC and SAGA, assemble using co-translational pathways, but their subcellular localization, cytoplasmic abundance, and functions are distinct.

Transcription start site heterogeneity and its role in RNA fate determination distinguish HIV-1 from other retroviruses and are mediated by core promoter elements

HIV-1 uses heterogeneous transcription start sites (TSSs) to generate two RNA 5' isoforms that adopt radically different structures and perform distinct replication functions. Although these RNAs differ in length by only two bases, exclusively the shorter RNA is encapsidated while the longer RNA is excluded from virions and provides intracellular functions. The current study examined TSS usage and packaging selectivity for a broad range of retroviruses and found that heterogenous TSS usage was a conserved feature of all tested HIV-1 strains, but all other retroviruses examined displayed unique TSSs. Phylogenetic csomparisons and chimeric viruses' properties provided evidence that this mechanism of RNA fate determination was an innovation of the HIV-1 lineage, with determinants mapping to core promoter elements. Fine-tuning differences between HIV-1 and HIV-2, which uses a unique TSS, implicated purine residue positioning plus a specific TSS-adjacent dinucleotide in specifying multiplicity of TSS usage. Based on these findings, HIV-1 expression constructs were generated that differed from the parental strain by only two point mutations yet each expressed only one of HIV-1's two RNAs. Replication defects of the variant with only the presumptive founder TSS were less severe than those for the virus with only the secondary start site.

SERINC5 Mediates a Postintegration Block to HIV-1 Gene Expression in Macrophages

HIV-1 antagonizes SERINC5 by redundant mechanisms, primarily through Nef and additionally via envelope glycoprotein. Paradoxically, HIV-1 preserves Nef function to ensure the exclusion of SERINC5 from virion incorporation regardless of the availability of envelope that can confer resistance, suggesting additional roles of the virion-incorporated host factor. Here, we report an unusual mode of SERINC5 action in inhibiting viral gene expression. This inhibition is observed only in the myeloid lineage cells but not in the cells of epithelial or lymphoid origin. We found that SERINC5-bearing viruses induce the expression of RPL35 and DRAP1 in macrophages, and these host proteins intercept HIV-1 Tat from binding to and recruiting a mammalian capping enzyme (MCE1) to the HIV-1 transcriptional complex. As a result, uncapped viral transcripts are synthesized, leading to the inhibition of viral protein synthesis and subsequent progeny virion biogenesis. Cell-type-specific inhibition of HIV-1 gene expression thus exemplifies a novel antiviral function of virion-incorporated SERINC5. IMPORTANCE In addition to Nef, HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein has been shown to modulate SERINC5-mediated inhibition. Counterintuitively, Nef from the same isolates preserves the ability to prevent SERINC5 incorporation into virions, implying additional functions of the host protein. We identify that virion-associated SERINC5 can manifest an antiviral mechanism independent of the envelope glycoprotein to regulate HIV-1 gene expression in macrophages. This mechanism is exhibited by affecting the viral RNA capping and is plausibly adopted by the host to overcome the envelope glycoprotein-mediated resistance to SERINC5 restriction.

Structure and mechanism of the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery

RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcribes all protein-coding genes and many noncoding RNAs in eukaryotic genomes. Although Pol II is a complex, 12-subunit enzyme, it lacks the ability to initiate transcription and cannot consistently transcribe through long DNA sequences. To execute these essential functions, an array of proteins and protein complexes interact with Pol II to regulate its activity. In this review, we detail the structure and mechanism of over a dozen factors that govern Pol II initiation (e.g., TFIID, TFIIH, and Mediator), pausing, and elongation (e.g., DSIF, NELF, PAF, and P-TEFb). The structural basis for Pol II transcription regulation has advanced rapidly in the past decade, largely due to technological innovations in cryoelectron microscopy. Here, we summarize a wealth of structural and functional data that have enabled a deeper understanding of Pol II transcription mechanisms; we also highlight mechanistic questions that remain unanswered or controversial.

Reporter-ChIP-nexus reveals strong contribution of the Drosophila initiator sequence to RNA polymerase pausing

RNA polymerase II (Pol II) pausing is a general regulatory step in transcription, yet the stability of paused Pol II varies widely between genes. Although paused Pol II stability correlates with core promoter elements, the contribution of individual sequences remains unclear, in part because no rapid assay is available for measuring the changes in Pol II pausing as a result of altered promoter sequences. Here, we overcome this hurdle by showing that ChIP-nexus captures the endogenous Pol II pausing on transfected plasmids. Using this reporter-ChIP-nexus assay in Drosophila cells, we show that the pausing stability is influenced by downstream promoter sequences, but that the strongest contribution to Pol II pausing comes from the initiator sequence, in which a single nucleotide, a G at the +2 position, is critical for stable Pol II pausing. These results establish reporter-ChIP-nexus as a valuable tool to analyze Pol II pausing.

Genomic encoding of transcriptional burst kinetics

Mammalian gene expression is inherently stochastic^1,2resulting in discrete bursts of RNA molecules synthesised from each allele^3–7. Although known to be regulated by promoters and enhancers, it is unclear how cis-regulatory sequences encode transcriptional burst kinetics. Characterization of transcriptional bursting, including the burst size and frequency, have mainly relied on live-cell^4,6,8 or single-molecule RNA-FISH^3,5,8,9 recordings of selected loci. Here, we inferred transcriptome-wide burst frequencies and sizes for endogenous genes using allele-sensitive single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq). We show that core promoter elements affect burst size and uncover synergistic effects between TATA and Initiator elements, which were masked at mean expression levels. Importantly, we provide transcriptome-wide support for enhancers controlling burst frequencies and we additionally demonstrate that cell-type-specific gene expression is primarily shaped by changes in burst frequencies. Altogether, our data show that burst frequency is primarily encoded in enhancers and burst size in core promoters, and that allelic scRNA-seq is a powerful paradigm for investigating transcriptional kinetics.

Spurious transcription and its impact on cell function

Most RNA polymerases can initiate transcription from diverse DNA template sequences with relatively few outright sequence restraints. Recent reports have demonstrated that failure to subdue the promiscuity of RNA polymerase in vivo can severely impede cell function. This phenomenon appears common to all cell types with undesirable effects ranging from growth inhibition in prokaryotes to cancer in higher organisms. Here we discuss similarities and differences in strategies employed by cells to minimise spurious transcription across life's domains.

Taspase1 processing alters TFIIA cofactor properties in the regulation of TFIID

TFIIA is an important positive regulator of TFIID, the primary promoter recognition factor of the basal RNA polymerase II transcription machinery. TFIIA antagonises negative TFIID regulators such as negative cofactor 2 (NC2), promotes specific binding of the TBP subunit of TFIID to TATA core promoter sequence elements and stimulates the interaction of TBP-associated factors (TAFs) in the TFIID complex with core promoter elements located downstream of TATA, such as the initiator element (INR). Metazoan TFIIA consists of 3 subunits, TFIIAα (35 kDa), β (19 kDa) and γ (12 kDa). TFIIAα and β subunits are encoded by a single gene and result from site-specific cleavage of a 55 kDa TFIIA(α/β) precursor protein by the protease Taspase1. Metazoan cells have been shown to contain variable amounts of TFIIA (55/12 kDa) and Taspase1-processed TFIIA (35/19/12 kDa) depending on cell type, suggesting distinct gene-specific roles of unprocessed and Taspase1-processed TFIIA. How precisely Taspase1 processing affects TFIIA functions is not understood. Here we report that Taspase1 processing alters TFIIA interactions with TFIID and the conformation of TFIID/TFIIA promoter complexes. We further show that Taspase1 processing induces increased sensitivity of TFIID/TFIIA complexes to the repressor NC2, which is counteracted by the presence of an INR core promoter element. Our results provide first evidence that Taspase1 processing affects TFIIA regulation of TFIID and suggest that Taspase1 processing of TFIIA is required to establish INR-selective core promoter activity in the presence of NC2.

Cloning and characterization of the human trefoil factor 3 gene promoter

Human trefoil factor 3 (hTFF3) is a small-molecule peptide with potential medicinal value. Its main pharmacological function is to alleviate gastrointestinal mucosal injuries caused by various factors and promote the repair of damaged mucosa. However, how its transcription is regulated is not yet known. The aim of this study was to clone the hTFF3 gene promoter region, identify the core promoter and any transcription factors that bind to the promoter, and begin to clarify the regulation of its expression. The 5′ flanking sequence of the hTFF3 gene was cloned from human whole blood genomic DNA by PCR. Truncated promoter fragments with different were cloned and inserted into the pGL3-Basic vector to determine the position of the core hTFF3 promoter. Transcription element maintaining basic transcriptional activity was assessed by mutation techniques. Protein-DNA interactions were analyzed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). RNA interference and gene over-expression were performed to assay the effect of transcription factor on the hTFF3 expression. The results showed that approximately 1,826 bp of the fragment upstream of hTFF3 was successfully amplified, and its core promoter region was determined to be from −300 bp to −280 bp through analysis of truncated mutants. Mutation analysis confirmed that the sequence required to maintain basic transcriptional activity was accurately positioned from −300 bp to −296 bp. Bioinformatic analysis indicated that this area contained a Sp1 binding site. Sp1 binding to the hTFF3 promoter was confirmed by ChIP experiments. Sp1 over-expression and interference experiments showed that Sp1 enhanced the transcriptional activity of the hTFF3 promoter and increased hTFF3 expression. This study demonstrated that Sp1 plays an important role in maintaining the transcription of hTFF3.

Selective recognition of viral promoters by host cell transcription complexes: challenges and opportunities to control latency

The rate of transcription driven by the HIV promoter defines both the entry into and reactivation from viral latency. The HIV core promoter plays a pivotal role in HIV latency by recruiting host cell RNA polymerase II pre-initiation complexes essential for viral transcription. Pioneering studies on the HIV core promoter revealed that the architecture of the HIV core promoter is specifically required for the amplification of transcription in response to the viral trans-activator Tat, and provided the proof-of-concept that the HIV core promoter represents a tractable drug target. The recent discovery of host cell transcription complexes that selectively recognize the HIV core promoter provides new impetus to investigate their components as novel targets to therapeutically extinguish or eradicate latent HIV.

CTGC motifs within the HIV core promoter specify Tat-responsive pre-initiation complexes

Background

HIV latency is an obstacle for the eradication of HIV from infected individuals. Stable post-integration latency is controlled principally at the level of transcription. The HIV trans-activating protein, Tat, plays a key function in enhancing HIV transcriptional elongation. The HIV core promoter is specifically required for Tat-mediated trans-activation of HIV transcription. In addition, the HIV core promoter has been shown to be a potential anti-HIV drug target. Despite the pivotal role of the HIV core promoter in the control of HIV gene expression, the molecular mechanisms that couple Tat function specifically to the HIV core promoter remain unknown.

Results

Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), the TATA box and adjacent sequences of HIV essential for Tat trans-activation were shown to form specific complexes with nuclear extracts from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, as well as from HeLa cells. These complexes, termed pre-initiation complexes of HIV (PICH), were distinct in composition and DNA binding specificity from those of prototypical eukaryotic TATA box regions such as Adenovirus major late promoter (AdMLP) or the hsp70 promoter. PICH contained basal transcription factors including TATA-binding protein and TFIIA. A mutational analysis revealed that CTGC motifs flanking the HIV TATA box are required for Tat trans-activation in living cells and correct PICH formation in vitro. The binding of known core promoter binding proteins AP-4 and USF-1 was found to be dispensable for Tat function. TAR RNA prevented stable binding of PICH-2, a complex that contains the general transcription factor TFIIA, to the HIV core promoter. The impact of TAR on PICH-2 specifically required its bulge sequence that is also known to interact with Tat.

Conclusion

Our data reveal that CTGC DNA motifs flanking the HIV TATA box are required for correct formation of specific pre-initiation complexes in vitro and that these motifs are also required for Tat trans-activation in living cells. The impact of TAR RNA on PICH-2 stability provides a mechanistic link by which pre-initiation complex dynamics could be coupled to the formation of the nascent transcript by the elongating transcription complex. Together, these findings shed new light on the mechanisms by which the HIV core promoter specifically responds to Tat to activate HIV gene expression.

Core promoter-selective function of HMGA1 and Mediator in Initiator-dependent transcription

The factors and mechanisms underlying the differential activity and regulation of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II on different types of core promoters have remained elusive. Here we show that the architectural factor HMGA1 and the Mediator coregulator complex cooperate to enhance basal transcription from core promoters containing both a TATA box and an Initiator (INR) element but not from "TATA-only" core promoters. INR-dependent activation by HMGA1 and Mediator requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP)-associated factors (TAFs) within the TFIID complex and counteracts negative regulators of TBP/TATA-dependent transcription such as NC2 and Topoisomerase I. HMGA1 interacts with TFIID and Mediator and is required for the synergy of TATA and INR elements in mammalian cells. Accordingly, natural HMGA1-activated genes in embryonic stem cells tend to have both TATA and INR elements in a synergistic configuration. Our results suggest a core promoter-specific regulation of Mediator and the basal transcription machinery by HMGA1.

TBP-related factors: a paradigm of diversity in transcription initiation

TATA binding protein (TBP) is a key component of the eukaryotic transcription initiation machinery. It functions in several complexes involved in core promoter recognition and assembly of the pre-initiation complex. Through gene duplication eukaryotes have expanded their repertoire of TATA binding proteins, leading to a variable composition of the transcription machinery. In vertebrates this repertoire consists of TBP, TBP-like factor (TLF, also known as TBPL1, TRF2) and TBP2 (also known as TBPL2, TRF3). All three factors are essential, with TLF and TBP2 playing important roles in development and differentiation, in particular gametogenesis and early embryonic development, whereas TBP dominates somatic cell transcription. TBP-related factors may compete for promoters when co-expressed, but also show preferential interactions with subsets of promoters. Initiation factor switching occurs on account of differential expression of these proteins in gametes, embryos and somatic cells. Paralogs of TFIIA and TAF subunits account for additional variation in the transcription initiation complex. This variation in core promoter recognition accommodates the expanded regulatory capacity and specificity required for germ cells and embryonic development in higher eukaryotes.

The metazoan ATAC and SAGA coactivator HAT complexes regulate different sets of inducible target genes

Histone acetyl transferases (HATs) play a crucial role in eukaryotes by regulating chromatin architecture and locus-specific transcription. The GCN5 HAT was identified as a subunit of the SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase) multiprotein complex. Vertebrate cells express a second HAT, PCAF, that is 73% identical to GCN5. Here, we report the characterization of the mammalian ATAC (Ada-Two-A-Containing) complexes containing either GCN5 or PCAF in a mutually exclusive manner. In vitro ATAC complexes acetylate lysine 14 of histone H3. Moreover, ATAC- or SAGA-specific knock-down experiments suggest that both ATAC and SAGA are involved in the acetylation of histone H3K9 and K14 residues. Despite their catalytic similarities, SAGA and ATAC execute their coactivator functions on distinct sets of inducible target genes. Interestingly, ATAC strongly influences the global phosphorylation level of histone H3S10, suggesting that in mammalian cells a cross-talk exists linking ATAC function to H3S10 phosphorylation.

Dr1 (NC2) is present at tRNA genes and represses their transcription in human cells

Dr1 (also known as NC2β) was identified as a repressor of RNA polymerase (pol) II transcription. It was subsequently shown to inhibit pol III transcription when expressed at high levels in vitro or in yeast cells. However, endogenous Dr1 was not detected at pol III-transcribed genes in growing yeast. In contrast, we demonstrate that endogenous Dr1 is present at pol III templates in human cells, as is its dimerization partner DRAP1 (also called NC2α). Expression of tRNA by pol III is selectively enhanced by RNAi-mediated depletion of endogenous human Dr1, but we found no evidence that DRAP1 influences pol III output in vivo. A stable association was detected between endogenous Dr1 and the pol III-specific transcription factor Brf1. This interaction may recruit Dr1 to pol III templates in vivo, as crosslinking to these sites increases following Brf1 induction. On the basis of these data, we conclude that the physiological functions of human Dr1 include regulation of pol III transcription.

The basal initiation machinery: beyond the general transcription factors

In vitro experiments led to a simple model in which basal transcription factors sequentially assembled with RNA Polymerase II to generate a preinitiation complex (PIC). Emerging evidence indicates that PIC composition is not universal, but promoter-dependent. Active promoters are occupied by a mixed population of complexes, including regulatory factors such as NC2, Mot1, Mediator, and TFIIS. Recent studies are expanding our understanding of the roles of these factors, demonstrating that their functions are both broader and more context dependent than previously realized.

TFIIB recognition elements control the TFIIA-NC2 axis in transcriptional regulation

TFIIB recognizes DNA sequence-specific motifs that can flank the TATA elements of the promoters of protein-encoding genes. The TFIIB recognition elements (BRE(u) and BRE(d)) can have positive or negative effects on transcription in a promoter context-dependent manner. Here we show that the BREs direct the selective recruitment of TFIIA and NC2 to the promoter. We find that TFIIA preferentially associates with BRE-containing promoters while NC2 is recruited to promoters that lack consensus BREs. The functional relevance of the BRE-dependent recruitment of TFIIA and NC2 was determined by small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of TFIIA and NC2, both of which elicited BRE-dependent effects on transcription. Our results confirm the established functional reciprocity of TFIIA and NC2. However, our findings show that TFIIA assembly at BRE-containing promoters results in reduced transcriptional activity, while NC2 acts as a positive factor at promoters that lack functional BREs. Taken together, our results provide a basis for the selective recruitment of TFIIA and NC2 to the promoter and give new insights into the functional relationship between core promoter elements and general transcription factor activity.

The RNA polymerase II core promoter - the gateway to transcription

The RNA polymerase II core promoter is generally defined to be the sequence that directs the initiation of transcription. This simple definition belies a diverse and complex transcriptional module. There are two major types of core promoters - focused and dispersed. Focused promoters contain either a single transcription start site or a distinct cluster of start sites over several nucleotides, whereas dispersed promoters contain several start sites over 50-100 nucleotides and are typically found in CpG islands in vertebrates. Focused promoters are more ancient and widespread throughout nature than dispersed promoters; however, in vertebrates, dispersed promoters are more common than focused promoters. In addition, core promoters may contain many different sequence motifs, such as the TATA box, BRE, Inr, MTE, DPE, DCE, and XCPE1, that specify different mechanisms of transcription and responses to enhancers. Thus, the core promoter is a sophisticated gateway to transcription that determines which signals will lead to transcription initiation.