The conserved C-terminus of Sss1p is required to maintain the endoplasmic reticulum permeability barrier

Defective gating of the Sec61 translocon results in reorganisation of the actin cytoskeleton and perturbed formation of the actomyosin contractile ring

The Sec61 complex sits between the distinct environments of the cytosol and the ER lumen and it's appropriate gating is essential to prevent the deleterious flux of molecules and ions between them. Using the sss1-7 mutant we show that actin dynamics is grossly perturbed when translocon gating is defective. Importantly, normal actin morphology is restored when sss1-7 translocon gating defects are suppressed or when these cells are treated with cell-permeable Ca2+ chelators. Our findings underscore the importance of translocon gating, particularly in regulating Ca2+ homeostasis, in the overall regulation and functional distribution of the actin cytoskeleton.

Diverse Sphingolipid Species Harbor Different Effects on Ire1 Clustering

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) function is dedicated to multiple essential processes in eukaryotes, including the processing of secretory proteins and the biogenesis of most membrane lipids. These roles implicate a heavy burden to the organelle, and it is thus prone to fluctuations in the homeostasis of molecules which govern these processes. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a general ER stress response tasked with maintaining the ER for optimal function, mediated by the master activator Ire1. Ire1 is an ER transmembrane protein that initiates the UPR, forming characteristic oligomers in response to irregularities in luminal protein folding and in the membrane lipid environment. The role of lipids in regulating the UPR remains relatively obscure; however, recent research has revealed a potent role for sphingolipids in its activity. Here, we identify a major role for the oxysterol-binding protein Kes1, whose activity is of consequence to the sphingolipid profile in cells resulting in an inhibition of UPR activity. Using an mCherry-tagged derivative of Ire1, we observe that this occurs due to inhibition of Ire1 to form oligomers. Furthermore, we identify that a sphingolipid presence is required for Ire1 activity, and that specific sphingolipid profiles are of major consequence to Ire1 function. In addition, we highlight cases where Ire1 oligomerization is absent despite an active UPR, revealing a potential mechanism for UPR induction where Ire1 oligomerization is not necessary. This work provides a basis for the role of sphingolipids in controlling the UPR, where their metabolism harbors a crucial role in regulating its onset.

Cancer associated mutations in Sec61γ alter the permeability of the ER translocase

Translocation of secretory and integral membrane proteins across or into the ER membrane occurs via the Sec61 complex, a heterotrimeric protein complex possessing two essential sub-units, Sec61p/Sec61α and Sss1p/Sec61γ and the non-essential Sbh1p/Sec61β subunit. In addition to forming a protein conducting channel, the Sec61 complex maintains the ER permeability barrier, preventing flow of molecules and ions. Loss of Sec61 integrity is detrimental and implicated in the progression of disease. The Sss1p/Sec61γ C-terminus is juxtaposed to the key gating module of Sec61p/Sec61α and is important for gating the translocon. Inspection of the cancer genome database identifies six mutations in highly conserved amino acids of Sec61γ/Sss1p. We identify that five out of the six mutations identified affect gating of the ER translocon, albeit with varying strength. Together, we find that mutations in Sec61γ that arise in malignant cells result in altered translocon gating dynamics, this offers the potential for the translocon to represent a target in co-therapy for cancer treatment.

How does Sec63 affect the conformation of Sec61 in yeast?

The Sec complex catalyzes the translocation of proteins of the secretory pathway into the endoplasmic reticulum and the integration of membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Some substrate peptides require the presence and involvement of accessory proteins such as Sec63. Recently, a structure of the Sec complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, consisting of the Sec61 channel and the Sec62, Sec63, Sec71 and Sec72 proteins was determined by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Here, we show by co-precipitation that the Sec61 channel subunit Sbh1 is not required for formation of stable Sec63-Sec61 contacts. Molecular dynamics simulations started from the cryo-EM conformation of Sec61 bound to Sec63 and of unbound Sec61 revealed how Sec63 affects the conformation of Sec61 lateral gate, plug, pore region and pore ring diameter via three intermolecular contact regions. Molecular docking of SRP-dependent vs. SRP-independent signal peptide chains into the Sec61 channel showed that the pore regions affected by presence/absence of Sec63 play a crucial role in positioning the signal anchors of SRP-dependent substrates nearby the lateral gate.