Diet and cancer prevention: the concerted action polyp prevention (CAPP) studies

Association Between Low-Dose Aspirin Use and Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Taiwan

IMPORTANCE

Population-based East Asian data have corroborated reports from non-Asian settings on the association between low-dose aspirin and a lower risk of colorectal cancer (CRC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between duration and recency of low-dose aspirin use and CRC risk.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This nested case-control study included individuals who initiated aspirin use and matched individuals who did not use aspirin. Data were collected from Taiwan National Health Insurance and Taiwan Cancer Registry from 2000 through 2015. CRC cases were age- and sex-matched in a 1:4 ratio with individuals in a control group, identified from a cohort of individuals who used and did not use aspirin through risk-set sampling. Data analysis was conducted from June 2018 to July 2019.

EXPOSURES

Low-dose aspirin use was defined as receiving less than 150 mg per day, whereas 100 mg/d was most commonly used. Based on duration and recency of low-dose aspirin use between cohort entry (initiation date of low-dose aspirin for aspirin use group or randomly assigned date for those who did not use aspirin) and index date (CRC diagnosis date for individuals in the case group and the diagnosis date for the 4 corresponding matched individuals in the control group), the 3 following mutually exclusive exposure groups served as the basis for analysis: (1) long-term current low-dose aspirin use, (2) episodic low-dose aspirin use, and (3) no low-dose aspirin use (the reference group).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

CRC risk among the 3 exposure groups.

RESULTS

Among 4 710 504 individuals (2 747 830 [51.7%] men; median [interquartile range] age at cohort entry in initiator group, 61 [52-71] years; median [interquartile range] age at cohort entry in nonuse group, 59 [51-68] years), 79 095 CRC cases (1.7% of study cohort) were identified. Compared with no low-dose aspirin use, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for long-term current low-dose aspirin use and CRC risk was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93); for episodic use, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.89). Adjusted ORs of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.61-0.67) were observed for long-term current use and episodic low-dose aspirin use within the subcohort of individuals who initiated low-dose aspirin between age 40 and 59 years.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, low-dose aspirin use was associated with 11% lower CRC risk in an East Asian population, and this association was larger when low-dose aspirin use started before age 60 years.

The role of aspirin in preventing colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the developed world and is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the UK and USA. Regular use of aspirin can reduce cancer incidence, recurrence, metastasis and cancer-related mortality.

SOURCES OF DATA

Peer-reviewed journals, governmental and professional society publications.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

There is a wide body of evidence from observational studies and randomized trials that aspirin reduces risk of CRC. There is a delay of several years between initiation and effect. There is interpersonal variation in aspirin metabolism but pharmacogenetic testing is not yet sufficiently sensitive or specific to justify routine use.

AREAS OF DISAGREEMENT

There is uncertainty about the optimal dose and the duration of aspirin. There is debate around use for the general population but there is growing consensus on use in those at increased risk of developing cancer.

GROWING POINTS

Understanding is growing of the possible mechanisms by which aspirin exerts its anticancer effects. Large-scale meta-analyses are quantifying the cost-benefit ratio in the general population. International trials are underway to assess the optimal dose in high-risk individuals and the role of aspirin as an adjuvant in those who present with a malignancy.

Chemoprevention in Lynch syndrome

CAPP1 tested aspirin 600 mg/day and/or resistant starch 30 g/day in 200 adolescent FAP carriers. Aspirin treatment resulted in a non-significant reduction in polyp number and a significant reduction in polyp size among patients treated with aspirin for more than 1 year. CAPP2 RCT used the same interventions in 937 Lynch syndrome patients, the first RCT to have cancer prevention as the primary endpoint. Aspirin did not reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasia in a mean treatment period of 29 months but double blind post intervention follow-up has revealed 48 participants developed 53 CRCs. Per protocol analysis showed 63% fewer colon cancers with aspirin (p = 0.008) apparent from 4 years, with a similar effect on other LS cancers. Resistant starch was not beneficial at long term followup. CAPP3 will involve a double blind dose non-inferiority trial comparing 100, 300 or 600 mg daily in 3,000 gene carriers. We can now recommend aspirin in people at high risk of colorectal cancer.

A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives

OBJECTIVE

First-degree relatives (FDRs) of people diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) have a two- to threefold increased risk of developing the same disease. Tailored print interventions based on behavior change theories have demonstrated considerable promise in facilitating health-promoting behaviors. This study compared the impact of two mailed print interventions on CRC screening outcomes among FDRs.

METHODS

This randomized trial compared effects of two mailed print interventions--one tailored and one nontailored--on participation in CRC screening among FDRs of CRC survivors. Data collected via phone interviews from 140 FDRs at baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.

RESULTS

At 3 months, both the tailored and nontailored interventions yielded modest but statistically insignificant increases in adherence to any CRC screening test (14% vs. 21%, respectively; p=0.30). While there were no main effects for tailored versus nontailored interventions, there were significant interactions that showed that the tailored print intervention had significantly greater effects on forward stage movement for CRC screening depending on stage of adoption at baseline, race, and objective CRC risk. Receipt of the tailored intervention was 2.5 times more likely to move baseline precontemplators and contemplators forward in stage of adoption for colonoscopy (95% CI: 1.10-5.68) and was three times more likely to move Caucasians forward in stage of adoption for FOBT (95% CI: 1.00-9.07). In addition, the tailored intervention was 7.7 times more likely to move people at average risk forward in stage of adoption for colonoscopy (95% CI: 1.25-47.75).

CONCLUSION

The tailored print intervention was more effective at moving Caucasians, those in precontemplation and contemplation at baseline, and those at average risk forward in their stage of adoption for CRC screening.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Both tailored and nontailored print interventions showed moderate effects for increasing CRC screening participation. Tailored print interventions may be more effective for certain subgroups.

Advances in dietary fibre characterisation. 2. Consumption, chemistry, physiology and measurement of resistant starch; implications for health and food labelling

Resistant starch (RS) is defined as ‘the sum of starch and products of starch degradation not absorbed in the small intestine of healthy individuals’. This basic definition includes different types of starches that (1) are physically inaccessible, usually due to an encapsulation in intact cell walls, or (2) are naturally highly resistant to mammalian α-amylase, or (3) have been modified by hydrothermic treatments then retrograded. Interest in RS has increased significantly during the last two decades, mostly due to its capacity to produce a large amount of butyrate all along the colon. Butyrate has been observed to have a range of effects on cell metabolism, differentiation and cell growth as well as inhibition of a variety of factors that underlie the initiation, progression and growth of colon tumours. The physiological definition of RS, which seems to be nearly consensual, raises a difficulty in proper analytical quantification of RS. A number of methods have, however, been proposed and provide similar values for the RS content in most of the starch types and starchy foods. It seems, however, that some starches, proven to be partly resistant according toin vivoinvestigations on ileostomy subjects, could not be quantified by most of these methods. This may be due to a widespread use of glucoamylase during the first steps of these methods. Accordingly, there is an international debate on health aspects of RS and on how to quantify the RS content of food products. The present review describes aspects of classification of RS, past and current consumption, physiological effects and analytical aspects, and concludes with impacts on food and product labelling.

Molecular characterization of the spectrum of genomic deletions in the mismatch repair genes MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2 responsible for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)

A systematic search by Southern blot analysis in a cohort of 439 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families for genomic rearrangements in the main mismatch repair (MMR) genes, namely, MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2, identified 48 genomic rearrangements causative of this inherited predisposition to colorectal cancer in 68 unrelated kindreds. Twenty-nine of the 48 rearrangements were found in MSH2, 13 in MLH1, 2 in MSH6, and 4 in PMS2. The vast majority were deletions, although one previously described large inversion, an intronic insertion, and a more complex rearrangement also were found. Twenty-four deletion breakpoints have been identified and sequenced in order to determine the underlying recombination mechanisms. Most fall within repetitive sequences, mainly Alu repeats, in agreement with the differential distribution of deletions between the MSH2 and MLH1 genes: the higher number and density of Alu repeats in MSH2 corresponded with a higher incidence of genomic rearrangement at this disease locus when compared with other MMR genes. Long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) repeats, relatively abundant in, for example, MLH1, did not seem to contribute to the genesis of the deletions, presumably because of their older evolutionary age and divergence among individual repeat units when compared with short interspersed nuclear element (SINE) repeats, including Alu repeats. Moreover, Southern blot analysis of the introns and the genomic regions flanking the MMR genes allowed us to detect 6 novel genomic rearrangements that left the coding region of the disease-causing gene intact. These rearrangements comprised 4 deletions upstream of the coding region of MSH2 (3 cases) and MSH6 (1 case), a 2-kb insertion in intron 7 of PMS2, and a small (459-bp) deletion in intron 13 of MLH1. The characterization of these genomic rearrangements underlines the importance of genomic deletions in the etiology of HNPCC and will facilitate the development of PCR-based tests for their detection in diagnostic laboratories.

Colorectal cancer chemoprevention--an overview of the science

The development and dissemination of sophisticated detection technologies have recently exposed the high prevalence of preinvasive colorectal neoplasia in the adult U.S. population. Although cancer screening and surveillance provide opportunities for risk stratification, they achieve risk reduction only when coupled with effective interventions. This review surveys the lead compounds for colorectal cancer prevention and the measures by which they may be prioritized for clinical testing. Clinical trials remain the rate-limiting step in agent development, and novel trial designs are needed to hasten agent identification and testing for cancer prevention. Innovative research models include the nesting of prevention end points within cancer treatment trials and within trials testing promising preventive compounds intended for nononcologic indications.

Are there socio-economic inequalities in age of resection of colorectal cancer in people with HNPCC?

The relationship between socio-economic status and health has been consistently reported and is thought to be causal. Socio-economic inequalities are present in the incidence of and mortality from cancer in general, but not in the incidence of colorectal cancer in particular. However, there are socio-economic gradients in mortality from colorectal cancer. The socio-economic distribution of incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer in individuals with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (Lynch syndrome) is not known. It is possible that increased awareness of and access to screening for colorectal cancer amongst this group of individuals reduces the socio-economic gradients seen in the population as a whole. We investigated the relationship between socio-economic status and age of resection of colorectal cancer in a cohort of individuals with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. More affluent individuals tended to undergo surgical resection for colorectal cancers earlier in their lives than less affluent individuals. This relationship was bordering on statistical significance. This trend probably represents socio-economic variations in access to treatment. In addition, age based diagnostic criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer may, inadvertently, accentuate socio-economic inequalities in outcome.

Genomic deletions in MSH2 or MLH1 are a frequent cause of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: identification of novel and recurrent deletions by MLPA

Gene dosage abnormalities account for a significant proportion of the mutations in genes tested in DNA diagnostic laboratories. Detection of these changes has proved a challenge as the methods available to date are time consuming or unreliable. The multiplex ligation-dependent probe assay (MLPA) is a new technique allowing relative quantification of up to 40 different nucleic acid sequences in a single reaction tube. We have evaluated MLPA for potential use in the diagnostic setting against the following criteria: accuracy, reagent cost, hands-on time, reliability, and retests required. A total of 215 UK patients referred for genetic testing on the basis of a family history consistent with autosomal dominant hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC or Lynch syndrome) were tested by MLPA. Of these, 12 cases with deletions of one or more exons were identified, six with MLH1 deletions and six with MSH2 deletions. Test failure rates were less than 5% and overall mutation detection sensitivity in this series was increased by approximately 50% by the inclusion of MLPA for an additional testing cost of about 10%. Two novel mutations in MSH2 and 10 novel point mutations in MLH1 were also identified during the course of this study. We conclude that MLPA is a cost effective and robust gene dosage method that can be readily adopted by diagnostic services. Comprehensive mutation scanning for MSH2 and MLH1 is incomplete without gene dosage analysis.

Genetic predisposition as a basis for chemoprevention, surgical and other interventions in colorectal cancer

Strategies of cancer prevention are generally developed with the population at large in mind. However, special attention is warranted for those persons with rare genetic traits associated with a greatly elevated risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) and some other malignancies: Orphan diseases demand Orphan preventive measures! Recent advances in modern genetics have enhanced our understanding of several genes and the specific germ-line mutations responsible for colorectal carcinogenesis. A number of features provide evidence for a genetic predisposition to CRC. These include typical clinical and histological features of a particular syndrome, a familial aggregation of CRC and associated malignancies, young age at onset of CRC, occurrence of multiple neoplasias and/or unusual localisation of the tumour (e.g., right side of the colon). In hereditary colorectal cancer, genetic testing can easily be demonstrated as cost-effective.

Can resistant starch and/or aspirin prevent the development of colonic neoplasia? The Concerted Action Polyp Prevention (CAPP) 1 Study

Loss of function of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumour suppressor gene through truncating mutations or other means is an early event in most colo-rectal cancer (CRC). The APC gene encodes a large multifunctional protein that plays key roles in several cellular processes, including the wnt signalling pathway where an intact APC protein is essential for down regulation of beta-catenin. The APC protein also plays a role in regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, cell-cell adhesion, cell migration and chromosomal stability during mitosis. Acquisition of a non-functional APC gene can occur by inheritance (in the disease familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)) or by a sporadic event in a somatic cell. Whilst there is strong epidemiological evidence that variation in diet is a major determinant of variation in CRC incidence, conventional adenoma recurrence trials in sporadic cases of the disease have been relatively unsuccessful in identifying potentially protective food components. Since the genetic basis of CRC in FAP and in sporadic CRC is similar, intervention trials in FAP gene carriers provide an attractive strategy for investigation of potential chemo-preventive agents, since smaller numbers of subjects and shorter time frames are needed. The Concerted Action Polyp Prevention (CAPP) 1 Study is using a 2 x 2 factorial design to test the efficacy of resistant starch (30 g raw potato starch-Hylon VII (1:1, w/w)/d) and aspirin (600 mg/d) in suppressing colo-rectal adenoma formation in young subjects with FAP. Biopsies of macroscopically-normal rectal mucosa are also being collected for assay of putative biomarkers of CRC risk.

Pulses and carcinogenesis: potential for the prevention of colon, breast and other cancers

Consumption of pulses as components of healthy diets is encouraged because it is believed that this is likely to help in reducing the risk of common non-communicable diseases, including cancers. However, the evidence base for the role of pulses in prevention of cancers is unconvincing because of the difficulties, using conventional epidemiological tools, in ascertaining the quantitative contribution made by pulses to cancer risk. Advances in understanding of the biological basis of cancer and of the mechanisms of action of cancer-preventing compounds offer new insights into the role of food-derived substances and of diet-gene interactions in modulating cancer risk. Pulses contain a rich variety of compounds which, if consumed in sufficient quantities, may help to reduce tumour risk.

The role of eicosanoids, cyclooxygenases, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal tumorigenesis and chemoprevention

There is mounting evidence from studies on experimental cancer in rodents, interventional studies in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, and some, but not all, epidemiologic investigations, that suggests a chemopreventive effect of aspirin and nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) against colorectal cancer. In addition, the mechanisms by which these agents modulate tumorigenesis are being elucidated in laboratory experiments. Currently available NSAIDs are unlikely to have an acceptable benefit-to-risk ratio for long-term use in an asymptomatic population. Once the discrete chemopreventive mechanisms are established and the genetic background and risk factor profile of individuals who will benefit from chemoprevention are clarified, a low-dose combination of NSAIDs with different targets may optimize efficacy and minimize toxicity. At present, however, colectomy is still the treatment of choice for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, and early screening and regular surveillance colonoscopies are the choices for those at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. In the average-risk individual, endoscopic screening and surveillance will remain the core of efforts to prevent sporadic colorectal cancer.

Genetics of colorectal cancer: hereditary aspects and overview of colorectal tumorigenesis

Familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer are dominantly inherited conditions with 100% and 80% life-time risk of developing colorectal cancer, respectively. The genetic mutations responsible for these two conditions lie in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and mismatch repair genes. These same genes also play a key role in the formation of sporadic colorectal cancers, which arise on a background of a similar spectrum of mutations to the hereditary cancers. This article examines the genetic mechanisms underlying the hereditary colorectal cancers, as well as genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer in the general population in the absence of a clear-cut genetic syndrome. Colorectal cancer arises as the cumulative effect of multiple mutations within the cell, allowing it to escape growth and regulatory control mechanisms. This step-wise progression of mutations facilitates the histological transition from normal mucosa to adenoma to carcinoma. The latter part of this paper focuses on the key genetic events underlying this process and provides an overview of the genetic mechanisms responsible for colorectal tumorigenesis.

Common hereditary cancers and implications for primary care

The identification of genes that place individuals at high risk of breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer has greatly advanced our understanding of cancer predisposition over the past decade. This knowledge has received much attention from the media, and referrals to geneticists and surgeons, and requests for genetic testing, have risen. We review the published evidence for the management of people at increased risk of hereditary cancers, to draw attention to areas of uncertainty and to discuss implications for primary care. We focus on common inherited cancers, since they will have the greatest effect on clinical practice over the next decade. Cancer genetics offers a model of how information on the genetics of other common diseases could affect primary care in the future. Strategies to support the integration of genetic medicine in primary care are needed to enable primary-care practitioners to identify individuals at raised genetic risk and to reassure patients for whom genetic testing and increased surveillance offer little benefit.

Review article: the prevention of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the industrialized world. Survival remains poor because most cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. It is a preventable disease as colorectal cancers usually develop slowly from an identifiable precursor lesion, the adenoma. The existing strategies for colorectal cancer prevention include dietary prevention, chemoprevention and endoscopic intervention. The exact relationship between diet, particularly fibre, and colorectal cancer remains unclear, with the most recent studies suggesting that dietary fibre may not decrease colorectal cancer risk as previously thought. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been shown to have a protective effect against colorectal cancer, but the adverse effect profile of the non COX-2 selective drugs, particularly the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage, precludes their widespread use. There is increasing evidence that colorectal cancer incidence and mortality can be decreased from endoscopic polypectomy and early detection of cancer. Faecal occult blood testing in the general population ('average-risk') has been shown in randomized trials to decrease mortality from colorectal cancer by 15--33%. Long-term results of randomized trials of the effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy screening in the general population are awaited. Targeting high risk individuals may also be an effective and efficient way to decrease the colorectal cancer burden. As many as 15--30% of colorectal cases may be due to hereditary factors. Individuals with one or two direct relatives affected are at moderate risk for colorectal cancer (empirical lifetime mortality from colorectal cancer approximately 10%) and approximately 2--3% of cases arise in individuals harbouring highly penetrant autosomal dominant mutations, which puts them at high-risk for colorectal cancer. Surveillance colonoscopy is offered to individuals at moderate and high risk for colorectal cancer.

Microsatellite instability: application in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of mortality in Western populations. About 15% of CRC patients report a family history of the disease. Studies on individuals with a genetic predisposition to CRC have been responsible for significant advances in the understanding of this disease. Thus, although developments in molecular biology have been mainly restricted to a minority of individuals with a hereditary background, information obtained from this group may affect the diagnosis and therapy of sporadic CRCs as well. Deficiency in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system results in microsatellite instability (MSI). Individuals from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) kindreds with germline mutations in genes involved in MMR may benefit from clinical screening programs. The higher frequency of MSI in HNPCC than in sporadic tumours suggests that involvement of MMR genes in sporadic adenomas may be uncommon. Consequently

Kill and cure: dietary augmentation of immune defences against colon cancer

At its most fundamental, cancer is a genetic disease resulting from inherited or acquired mutations in tumour suppressor genes and proto-oncogenes. Environmental factors, including ingested food components, interact with genetic inheritance to determine individual cancer risk. There is growing evidence that the immune system exerts selective pressure during neoplastic development. Tumour cells that evade this immunosurveillance because they are non-antigenic or because they defend themselves successfully against immune attack have a survival advantage. Effective chemopreventative agents will include dietary components that enhance the immune system's ability to identify transformed cells and to target them for apoptosis.

Nutrition in cancer prevention

Although variation in diet may account for approximately one third of the variation in cancer incidence worldwide, epidemiologic studies have proven to be a blunt instrument for identifying causal relationships between intakes of specific food constituents and cancer risk at specific sites. Diets rich in fruits and vegetables seem to be protective, but the adverse effects of beta carotene supplementation trials on lung cancer incidence in smokers caution against the attribution of benefit to single substances. Important diet-gene interactions may exist, as illustrated by differential responses to variation in folate status in those with methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms. Targeting initial intervention studies in those with explicit genetic predisposition to cancer may have both greater cost-effectiveness and fewer ethical difficulties than do similar studies in the general public.