The Quality of Life in Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors with Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema

Evaluating the effect of upper-body morbidity on quality of life following primary breast cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Improvements in breast cancer management continue to increase survival and life expectancy after treatment. Yet the adverse effects of treatment may persist long term, threatening physical, psychological, and social wellbeing, leading to impaired quality of life (QOL). Upper-body morbidity (UBM) such as pain, lymphoedema, restricted shoulder range of motion (ROM), and impaired function are widely reported after breast cancer treatment, but evidence demonstrating its impact on QOL is inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of UBM on QOL following primary breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

The study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020203445). CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, PsycInfo, PubMed/Medline, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for studies reporting QOL in individuals with and without UBM following primary breast cancer treatment. Primary analysis determined the standardised mean difference (SMD) in physical, psychological, and social wellbeing scores between UBM + /UBM - groups. Secondary analyses identified differences in QOL scores between groups, according to questionnaire.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight studies were included, with 39 conducive to meta-analysis. Types of UBM included pain, lymphoedema, restricted shoulder ROM, impaired upper-body function, and upper-body symptoms. UBM + groups reported poorer physical (SMD =  - 0.99; 95%CI =  - 1.26, - 0.71; p < 0.00001), psychological (SMD =  - 0.43; 95%CI =  - 0.60, - 0.27; p < 0.00001), and social wellbeing (SMD =  - 0.62; 95%CI =  - 0.83, - 0.40; p < 0.00001) than UBM - groups. Secondary analyses according to questionnaire showed that UBM + groups rated their QOL poorer or at equal to, UBM - groups across all domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings demonstrate the significant, negative impact of UBM on QOL, pervading physical, psychological, and social domains.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Efforts to assess and minimise the multidimensional impact of UBM are warranted to mitigate impaired QOL after breast cancer.

Ensuring patient centeredness in upper extremity lymphedema research: Identifying patient-prioritized agenda and preferences

PURPOSE

To elicit a patient-prioritized agenda and preferences for upper extremity lymphedema (LE) research.

METHODS

Focus group sessions (FGs) were conducted with English-speaking, adult women (18 years and older) with breast cancer-related LE (BCRL) seeking conservative or surgical care at two tertiary cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. An interview guide was used; women were asked to describe health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes that mattered the most to them, followed by their preferences for research study design and for providing patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM) data. Inductive content analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

A total of 16 women participated in 4 FG sessions (55 ± 9.5 years) and described the impact of LE on their appearance, physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being. Women emphasized that psychosocial well-being was often not discussed in clinical care and that they were poorly informed of LE risk and care options. Most women said that they would not be willing to be randomized to surgical versus conservative management of LE. They also expressed a preference to complete PROM data electronically. All women emphasized the value of having an open text option alongside PROMs to expand on their concerns.

CONCLUSION

Patient centeredness is key to generating meaningful data and ensuring ongoing engagement in clinical research. In LE, comprehensive PROMs that measure a range of HRQL concerns, especially psychosocial well-being, should be considered. Women with BCRL are reluctant to be randomized to conservative care when a surgical option is available, resulting in implications for planning trial sample size and recruitment.

In vivo vascularized scaffold with different shear-exposed models for lymphatic tissue regeneration

Current clinical treatments on lymphedema provide promising results, but also result in donor site morbidities. The establishment of a microenvironment optimized for lymphangiogenesis can be an alternative way to enhance lymphatic tissue formation. Hemodynamic flow stimuli have been confirmed to have an influential effect on angiogenesis in tissue engineering, but not on lymphatic vessel formation. Here, the three in vivo scaffolds generated from different blood stimuli in the subcutaneous layer, in the flow through pedicle, and in an arterio-venous (AV) loop model, were created to investigate potential of lymphangiogenesis of scaffolds containing lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs). Our results indicated that AV loop model displayed better lymphangiogenesis in comparison to the other two models with slower flow or no stimuli. Other than hemodynamic force, the supplement of LECs is required for lymphatic vessel regeneration. The in vivo scaffold generated from AV loop model provides an effective approach for engineering lymphatic tissue in the clinical treatment of lymphedema.

Vascularized lymph node transplantation successfully reverses lymphedema and maintains immunity in a rat lymphedema model

Vascularized lymph node transplantation (VLNT) has shown inspiring results for the treatment of lymphedema. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how VLNT restores lymphatic drainage and whether or not immunity recovers after surgery. Hindlimb lymphedema model was created using rats with extensive groin and popliteal lymph node removable following with radiotherapy, and the lymphedema was confirmed using indocyanine green (ICG) lymphangiography and micro‐computer tomography for volume measurement. VLNT was performed 1 month later. Volume measurement, ICG lymphangiography, histology, and immune reaction were done 1 month after surgery. VLNT successfully reduced the volume of the lymphedema hindlimb, restored lymphatic drainage function with proven lymphatic channel, and reduced lymphedema‐related inflammation and fibrosis. It promotes lymphangiogenesis shown from ICG lymphangiography, histology, and enhanced lymphangiogenesis gene expression. Dendritic cell trafficking via the regenerated lymphatic channels was successfully restored, and maintained systemic immune response was proved using dinitrofluorobenzene sensitization and challenge. VLNT effectively reduces lymphedema and promotes lymphatic regeneration in the capillary lymphatic but not the collecting lymphatic vessels. Along with the re‐established lymphatic system was the restoration of immune function locally and systemically. This correlated to clinical experience regarding the reduction of swelling and infection episodes after VLNT in lymphedema patients.

Creation of a rat lymphedema model using extensive lymph node dissection and circumferential soft tissue resection: Is this a reliable model?

INTRODUCTION

The medical demand for lymphedema treatment is huge since the disease mechanism remains unclear, and management are difficult. Our purpose was to develop a reliable lymphedema model mimicking the clinical scenario and allows a microsurgical approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Lewis rats weighing 400 to 450 g were used to create lymphedema with groin and popliteal lymph node dissection and creation of 5 mm circumferential skin defect (n = 6). A skin incision was made and closed primarily for control group (n = 5). Evaluation included indocyanine green (ICG) lymphangiography 1 and 2 months postoperatively, volume difference between bilateral hindlimbs measured using micro-CT, and the skin was harvested for histological evaluation 2 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Larger volume differences present in the lymphedema group (17.50 ± 7.76 vs. 3.73 ± 2.66%, p < .05). ICG lymphangiography indicated dermal backflow only in the lymphedema group. Increased thickness of the epidermis was noted in lymphedema group (28.50 ± 12.61 μm vs. 15.10 ± 5.41 μm, p < .0001). More CD45+ (35.6 ± 26.68 vs. 2.8 ± 4.23 cells/high power field [HPF], p < .0001), CD3+ (38.39 ± 20.17 vs. 9.73 ± 8.62 cells/HPF, p < .0001), and CD4+ cell infiltration (11.7 ± 7.71 vs. 2.0 ± 2.67 cells/HPF, p < .0001) were observed in the lymphedema group. Collagen type I deposition was more in the lymphedema group (0.15 ± 0.06 vs. 0.07 ± 0.03, p < .0005).

CONCLUSIONS

A rat lymphedema model was successfully established. The model can be applied in lymphedema related research.

Breast cancer-related lymphoedema: Risk factors and prediction model

AIMS

To identify the risk factors for lymphoedema following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in a European sample and to propose a lymphoedema prediction model for this population.

DESIGN

Predictive retrospective cohort study comparing women who developed lymphoedema in 2 years of undergoing ALND with those who did not developed lymphoedema.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical records of 504 women who, between January 2008 and May 2018, underwent surgery for breast cancer that involved ALND. Logistic regression was used to identify significant risk factors for lymphoedema. The prediction accuracy of the model was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Of the 504 women whose records were analysed, 156 developed lymphoedema. Significant predictors identified in the regression model were level of lymph node dissection, lymph node status, post-operative complications, body mass index (BMI) and number of lymph nodes extracted. The prediction model showed good sensitivity (80%) in the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

The factor contributing most to the risk of lymphoedema was the level of lymph node dissection, and the only patient-related factor in the prediction model was BMI. The model offers good predictive capacity in this population and it is a simple tool that breast care units could use to assess the risk of lymphoedema following ALND. Nurses with specialist knowledge of lymphoedema have a key role to play in ensuring that women receive holistic and individualized care.

IMPACT

What problem did the study address? Secondary lymphoedema is one of the main complications in the treatment of breast cancer. What were the main findings? The prediction model included five factors associated with the risk of lymphoedema following ALND. The strongest predictor was the level of lymph node dissection, and the only patient-related factor was BMI. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The prediction model offers breast care units a tool for assessing the risk of lymphoedema in women undergoing surgery involving ALND. The results highlight the importance of weight reduction as a preventive measure and support a more conservative surgical approach.

Quality of Life evaluation and lack of correlation with volumetric results after lymphovenous anastomoses in lymphedema therapy of the lower extremity

OBJECTIVE

Chronic primary or secondary lymphedema has a huge impact on quality of life (QOL) because of associated swelling, pain, decreased range of motion, depression and anxiety, and generally requires numerous adaptations. Many studies have shown a positive objective effect of lymphovenous anastomoses (LVAs) on chronic lymphedema. In this study, we assessed the effect of LVAs on QOL in patients with primary or secondary lymphedema of the lower extremity 6 months after surgery, and examine the correlation between changes in QOL and volumetric measurements.

METHOD

Only patients with either primary or secondary lymphedema of the lower extremity who had LVAs were included in the study. To assess QOL, a specially designed questionnaire based on the "Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory" (LyQLI) was used to evaluate the subjective therapeutic results from the patients' perspectives. Objective therapy success was assessed by 3D volumetric measurements of the lower leg. Measuring points, for both subjective and objective measurements, were the day before and 6 months after therapy.

RESULTS

The mean volume change 6 months after LVAs was -6.5% (sd 5.6, p < 0.001). A significantly better quality of life in terms of physical (37.6%, sd 25.2) and psychosocial (27.0%, sd 43.0) suffering as well as practical restrictions (22.3%, sd 24.8) was found (p values < 0.001). No correlation was found between QOL improvement and volume decrease (p values > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients suffering from lymphedema of the lower extremity, lymphovenous anastomoses lead to a significant volumetric decrease and quality of life improvement six months after treatment with no demonstrable relationship between QOL improvement and volume reduction.

Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Effect of Age, Lymphedema Severity, and Anxiety

Background: Patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) have lower quality of life (QOL). However, some important predictors, such as the effect of age, lymphedema severity, depression, and anxiety, have not yet been discovered. The overall objective of this study is to explore the QOL predictors associated with BCRL in China. Methods and Results: A cross-sectional design was conducted. Data were collected before treatment, including sociodemographic characteristics (height, heaviness, age, education level, work status, marital status, and economic status), clinical characteristics (surgical method, clinical cancer stage, lymphedema severity, and lymphedema duration), the hospital anxiety (HA) and depression scale, and the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality of life instrument. Univariate analysis or bivariate correlation was first made to explore the correlation of QOL with sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, anxiety, and depression. The multiple linear regression model was used to identify the independent QOL predictors. Seventy-one patients with BCRL were recruited. Age, education level, work status, family income, lymphedema duration, lymphedema severity, and HA and hospital depression scale scores are significantly correlated with QOL (p < 0.05). Age, lymphedema severity, and HA accounted for 85.9% in QOL (F = 62.76, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Age, lymphedema, and anxiety are the most important QOL predictors. Therefore, it is very important to establish a BCRL prevention system and pay attention to psychological distress in the patients with BCRL.

Psychosocial Issues Associated with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: a Literature Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic disease affecting breast cancer survivors. The purpose of this article is to update the scientific literature regarding psychosocial issues associated with BCRL.

RECENT FINDINGS

Reports describe economic burdens, social support, sexuality, BCRL patient-education needs, and interventions to reduce BCRL symptoms and improve QOL among women with breast cancer. The psychosocial impact of BCRL may differ between younger and older women which has implications for age-related interventions to reduce the adverse psychosocial experiences of women with BCRL. We did not locate studies reporting the psychosocial impact of BCRL on male breast cancer survivors.

SUMMARY

More psychosocial-based interventions are needed that target the concerns of those with BCRL, including age-related needs, sexual concerns, body image, and social support. Future research is indicated to study the psychosocial impact of BCRL among men. Researchers may consider how pandemic-driven health care policies affect the psychosocial needs of those with BCRL.

Responsiveness of the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Background: The Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Previous testing of this questionnaire showed very good psychometric properties; however, responsiveness has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to determine its internal and external responsiveness. Methods and Results: Ninety-five patients treated with decongestive lymphatic therapy in a longitudinal trial were recruited. Patients completed the Lymph-ICF-UL twice within a time interval of 7 weeks ("intensive group" receiving intensive treatment; n = 73) or 3 months ("stable group" receiving maintenance treatment; n = 22), and once the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) questionnaire at the second time point. The significance of change in scores and standardized response mean (SRM) were determined for the total and domain scores. Correlations between Lymph-ICF-UL and GPE were ascertained. In addition, the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) was determined. The Lymph-ICF-UL total score changed significantly in the intensive group (p < 0.001) and nonsignificantly for those in the stable group (p = 0.25). The SRM represented moderate responsiveness (0.65). Patients who reported a clinical improvement ( = responders) after intensive treatment showed a significant decrease in total score (p < 0.001), this was also the case for nonresponders (p < 0.001). Lymph-ICF-UL total and domain scores showed nonsignificant weak correlations with the GPE (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in mean total score changes between responders and nonresponders (p < 0.001). MCID for the total score was 9%. Conclusion: The Lymph-ICF-UL is responsive to change after decongestive lymphatic therapy. No correlations were found between Lymph-ICF-UL change scores and GPE. Future studies should be conducted in a clinical setting, with more variability between participants and their treatment responses.

Effect of yoga exercise on the quality of life and upper extremity volume among women with breast cancer related lymphedema: A pilot study

PURPOSE

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the effect of an 8-weeks-yoga intervention on quality of life and upper extremity edema volume in women with breast cancer related lymphedema.

METHODS

This was a controlled trial with pre-post design. A total of 40 women with breast cancer related lymphedema were randomly assigned into an intervention or control groups. The intervention group participated in a yoga exercise class for 8 weeks, in a twice a week instructor-led practice and once a week home practice. Outcomes were EORTC QLQ_C30 to measure quality of life, and water displacement volume-meter to measure upper extremity edema volume. The outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 4th and 8th week. Data were analyzed using SPSS.

RESULTS

Four weeks after the intervention, a significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to role functioning of quality of life (P = 0.03). Eight weeks after the intervention, a significant difference was observed between groups concerning physical and emotional functioning of quality of life (P < 0.05). The changing trend in physical, role, emotional, and cognitive functioning had increased, and in some scales such as fatigue, pain, insomnia, and financial difficulties the scores were reduced in the intervention group. Regarding edema volume, no significant difference was found between both groups on the 4th and 8th week after the intervention (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

As yoga exercise might improve physical, role, and emotional functioning of quality of life as well as reduce fatigue, pain, and insomnia, using this intervention can be suggested amongst women with breast cancer related lymphedema.

[The feasibility of the early application of the means for the physical rehabilitation with a view to improvement of life quality in the women presenting with postmastectomy syndrome]

BACKGROUND

the problem of rehabilitation and improvement of the life quality of women with the postmastectomy syndrome holds an important place in the modern concept of the treatment of breast cancer.

AIM

The objective of the present study was to determine the purposefulness of the early application of the available means and methods of physical rehabilitation for the improvement of the life quality in the women presenting with postmastectomy syndrome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 135 women with the postmastectomy syndrome who had undergone radical mastectomy as described by Madden followed by postoperative radiotherapy. Fifty women were examined and treated as in-patients whereas the remaining 85 ones were out-patients under regular medical check-up The average age of the treated patients was 60.27±0.79 years. The in-patients were randomly subdivided into two groups: the main one (n=25) and the group of comparison (n=25). At the stage of dispensary observations, the women were also allocated to two groups: the first (n=45) and the second main groups (n=40), depending on the choice of the personality-oriented program for physical rehabilitation. The analysis of the quality of life was carried out in the beginning of the out-patient rehabilitation treatment, then within 6 and 12 months after its initiation making use of the standardized Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-B + 4) questionnaire.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The benefits of the early physical rehabilitation of the in-patients first became apparent within six months after the onset of training as follows from the significantly better performance of the physical, social, emotional functions estimated taking into consideration the subscales of breast cancer and hand disorders in the women comprising the main group of the patients in comparison with those in the first and second main groups: the difference amounted to 2.34 (p<0.05), 1,88 (р<0.01), 2,52 (р<0.001), 3,52 (р<0.001) and 4,09 (р<0.001) points respectively. In a year, only the improvement of the social and emotional state persisted.

CONCLUSION

The proposed personality-oriented program of physical rehabilitation can be used in the clinical practice of the relevant specialized departments for the improvement of the quality of life of the women presenting with postmastectomy syndrome.