Evaluation of cochlear implant electrode position after a modified round window insertion by means of a 64-multislice CT

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Post-Cochlear Implant Vestibular Dysfunction: Round Window Versus Standard Cochleostomy Approaches

BACKGROUND

Two main techniques for cochlear implantation (CI) are commonly used: the standard cochleostomy (SCA) and the round window approach (RWA). Initially, the RWA was more utilized, followed by the SCA for cases with challenging visualization. Recent studies show that RWA is preferred due to SCA's risk of damaging cochlear structures.

AIM

We aim to compare post-CI complications between the RWA and SCA approaches.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Eligibility screening was performed to determine inclusion criteria, and data extraction from the selected studies was conducted independently. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as rate ratios (RR) and standard errors (SE), with significance determined by a p value >0.05 between CI subgroups. The generic inverse variance analysis method was applied with the employment of the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Our systematic review encompassed 82 studies, of which 58 were eligible for meta-analysis. Vertigo was documented in 10% of instances utilizing the RWA technique and in 8% of cases using the SCA method. Likewise, dizziness was noted in 18% of RWA cases and in 14% of SCA cases. The overall incidence of vestibular complications was 36% for RWA and 17% for SCA. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between these approaches ( p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both the RWA and the SCA approaches demonstrate comparable post-CI complication profiles concerning dizziness, vertigo, and overall vestibular complications, with the RWA approach showing slightly higher incidences. However, no significant difference was found between the two techniques.

Various approaches to the round window for cochlear implantation: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Round window approaches are used to insert a cochlear implant electrode array into the scala tympani. This study aimed to review the literature to find the reported round window approaches.

METHOD

This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses ('PRISMA') guidelines. Articles that described their surgical approach to the round window were included. The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched through to June 2021. The study protocol was registered on Prospero (reference number: CRD42021226940).

RESULTS

A total of 42 reports were included. The following approaches were documented: the standard facial recess, keyhole, retrofacial, modified suprameatal, transaditus, combined posterior tympanotomy and endomeatal, modified Veria, canal wall down approaches, and endoscopically assisted technique.

CONCLUSION

This review suggested that there are numerous distinct round window approaches, providing alternatives when the round window is inaccessible through the standard facial recess.

Inner-ear augmented metal artifact reduction with simulation-based 3D generative adversarial networks

Metal Artifacts creates often difficulties for a high quality visual assessment of post-operative imaging in computed tomography (CT). A vast body of methods have been proposed to tackle this issue, but these methods were designed for regular CT scans and their performance is usually insufficient when imaging tiny implants. In the context of post-operative high-resolution CT imaging, we propose a 3D metal artifact reduction algorithm based on a generative adversarial neural network. It is based on the simulation of physically realistic CT metal artifacts created by cochlea implant electrodes on preoperative images. The generated images serve to train a 3D generative adversarial networks for artifacts reduction. The proposed approach was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively on clinical conventional and cone beam CT of cochlear implant postoperative images. These experiments show that the proposed method outperforms other general metal artifact reduction approaches.

Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography

Purpose

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) offers a valid alternative to conventional Computed Tomography (CT). A possible radiation dose reduction with the use of CBCT in postoperative imaging of CIs is of great importance. Whether the visualization of Cochlear Implant (CI) electrodes in CBCT correlates with the radiation dose applied was investigated in this study.

Methods

We compared the visualization quality of Contour Advance CIs to Straight CIs from Cochlear using CBCT with varying tube parameters on whole-head specimen.

Results

The internal diameter of the cochlea decreases from base to apex, resulting in a significantly different intracochlear positioning of the two tested CI models. While electrodes of the Contour Advance series are located close to the modiolus, thus closer to the spiral ganglion neurons, those of the Straight series are located further away. The artifact portion of the electrode amounts to 50–70% of the radiological diameter of the electrode. An increase in artifact portion from the base (electrode #1 approx. 50%) to the apex (electrode #20 approx. 70%) of the cochlea was observed. The visualization of electrodes in the medial and apical part of the cochlea is limited due to artifact overlapping. There was no correlation between the artifact size and the applied radiation dose.

Conclusion

The results indicate that a reduction of the radiation dose by up to 45% of the currently applied radiation dose of standard protocols would be possible. Investigations of the effects on subjective image quality still need to be performed.

Potential insertion complications with cochlear implant electrodes

Objectives: The aim of this discussion paper and literature review was to estimate the incidence of a variety of complications associated with the surgical placement of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays and to discuss the implications and management of sub-optimal electrode placement. Results: A review of the peer-reviewed literature suggests that the incidence of incomplete electrode insertion and kinking is more prevalent in straight arrays and not more than about 2% in CI recipients with normal cochlear anatomy/patency. Incidence of tip fold-over is greater with perimodiolar arrays but also occurs with straight arrays and is typically less than 5%. Conversely, electrode migration is more common with straight arrays, and high rates (up to 46%) have been reported in some studies. Scalar translocations have also been reported for both perimodiolar and straight arrays. Higher rates have been reported for stylet-based perimodiolar electrodes inserted via cochleostomy (up to 56%), but with much lower rates (<10%) with both sheath-based perimodiolar arrays and lateral wall arrays. Electrode positioning complications represent a significant proportion of perioperative CI complications and compromise the level of benefit from the device. Careful surgical planning and appropriate pre- and intraoperative imaging can reduce the likelihood and impact of electrode positioning complications. There is also evidence that newer array designs are less prone to certain complications, particularly scalar translocation. Conclusions: It is important that implanting surgeons are aware of the impact of sub-optimal electrode placement and the steps that can be taken to avoid, identify and manage such complications.

Does cochlear implantation influence postural stability in patients with hearing loss?

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implantation (CI) procedure carries the potential risk for vestibular system insult or stimulation with resultant dysfunction due to its proximity to the cochlea. The vestibular system plays an essential role in crucial tasks such as postural control, gaze stabilization and spatial orientation.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does standard cochlear implantation influence postural stability in patients with hearing loss?

METHODS

The study included 21 individuals (age 51 ± 18 years) qualified to undergo CI due to severe or profound hearing loss. Participants were qualified for both groups by a physician based on an interview, an otoneurological examination and vestibular tests. The first group included patients without vestibular dysfunction, whereas the other group consisted of persons with vestibular dysfunction. The research methodology included medical examinations, anthropometric measurements and stabilometry on the Biodex Balance System SD (BBS) platform. The examinations were carried out twice, i.e. prior to and 3 months post implantation. The recorded data was compared between the first and the second examination using a non-parametric Wilcoxon test. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc HSD unequal sample sizes were performed for patients with and without vestibular dysfunction.

RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Study showed that 52.4% of the participants obtained results within the norm, while 47.6% scored below it. The comparison of stability indices of the examined individuals, with and without vestibular dysfunction, did not reveal statistically significant differences. The only difference was the anterior-posterior stability index assessed in static conditions. Three months after the implantation, no changes in the majority of indices were noted, with the exception of anterior-posterior stability index, which improved following the implantation. CI does not affect postural stability changes in the study participants.

An In-Vitro Insertion-Force Study of Magnetically Guided Lateral-Wall Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays

Hypothesis:

Insertion forces can be reduced by magnetically guiding the tip of lateral-wall cochlear-implant electrode arrays during insertion via both cochleostomy and the round window.

Background:

Steerable electrode arrays have the potential to minimize intracochlear trauma by reducing the severity of contact between the electrode-array tip and the cochlear wall. However, steerable electrode arrays typically have increased stiffness associated with the steering mechanism. In addition, steerable electrode arrays are typically designed to curve in the direction of the basal turn, which is not ideal for round-window insertions, as the cochlear hook's curvature is in the opposite direction. Lateral-wall electrode arrays can be modified to include magnets at their tips, augmenting their superior flexibility with a steering mechanism. By applying magnetic torque to the tip, an electrode array can be navigated through the cochlear hook and the basal turn.

Methods:

Automated insertions of candidate electrode arrays are conducted into a scala-tympani phantom with either a cochleostomy or round-window opening. The phantom is mounted on a multi-degree-of-freedom force sensor. An external magnet applies the necessary magnetic bending torque to the magnetic tip of a modified clinical electrode array, coordinated with the insertion, with the goal of directing the tip down the lumen. Steering of the electrode array is verified through a camera.

Results:

Statistical t-test results indicate that magnetic guidance does reduce insertion forces by as much as 50% with certain electrode-array models. Direct tip contact with the medial wall through the cochlear hook and the lateral wall of the basal turn is completely eliminated. The magnetic field required to accomplish these insertions varied from 77 to 225 mT based on the volume of the magnet at the tip of the electrode array. Alteration of the tip to accommodate a tiny magnet is minimal and does not change the insertion characteristic of the electrode array unless the tip shape is altered.

Conclusion:

Magnetic guidance can eliminate direct tip contact with the medial walls through the cochlear hook and the lateral walls of the basal turn. Insertion-force reduction will vary based on the electrode-array model, but is statistically significant for all models tested. Successful steering of lateral-wall electrode arrays is accomplished while maintaining its superior flexibility.

Meta-analysis of subjective complaints of vertigo and vestibular tests after cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative vertigo is a common complaint after cochlear implantation, but published incidence rates differ vastly. The aim of the present study was to investigate both subjective complaints of vertigo before and after cochlear implantation and related vestibular diagnostic tests on cochlear implant candidates.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic literature search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement in PubMed, Cochrane Register, and EMBASE.

REVIEW METHODS

We presented 116 eligible studies investigating subjective complaints of vertigo after cochlear implantation and/or related vestibular diagnostic tests. We conducted three meta-analyses of 46 eligible studies with matched pre- and postoperative data to calculate the odds ratio of new vertigo onset, as well as the impairment of vestibular receptors measured by nystagmography and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP). Postoperative vertigo was calculated from 95 studies and further subdivided by mean age with pooled data.

RESULTS

We observed a significant increase in postoperative vertigo and significant impairment of nystagmography and cVEMP detection. Vertigo after cochlear implantation was reported in 9.3% of the patients with a continuous increase in patient age at surgery. In a subgroup of studies, new onset of vertigo was found in 17.4% of the patients. In addition, 7.2% of the patients had persisting vertigo complaints, whereas 11.6% described an altered vertigo quality and 7.7% had their preoperative complaints resolved. A comparison of round window approach and cochleostomy revealed significantly increased vertigo after cochleostomy. Both insertion methods showed similar effects in nystagmography and cVEMP testing.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation has a significant impact on subjective vertigo and vestibular receptor function. This is affected by the patient's age at the time of surgery. The surgical technique (round window or cochleostomy) may influence the outcome, but this requires further investigation. Younger patients may compensate better following vestibular dysfunction. Perioperative testing is required to correlate vestibular impairment and subjective complaints. Laryngoscope, 2018 Laryngoscope, 128:2110-2123, 2018.

Possibility of differentiation of cochlear electrodes in radiological measurements of the intracochlear and chorda-facial angle position

Due to an increasing number of cochlear implantations, quality control has become more important. In addition to intraoperative biophysical measurements, radiological imaging is another possibility. An upcoming technique regarding this is Cone Beam CT (CBCT). Sixty-five data sets (35 Nucleus Contour Advance–Cochlear; 30 Flex Soft–MedEl) of postoperative imaging by CBCT (Accu-I-tomo F17, Morita, Kyoto, Japan) underwent further evaluation. Insertion angle, height of the cochlea, distance of the electrode to the medial or lateral wall, angle between chorda tympani and facial nerve and the precise position of the electrode cable in the facial-chordal angle were determined. The typical difference between the perimodiolar and lateral course of the electrodes could also be shown in radiological measurements. This demonstrates the accuracy and advantage of CBCT in visualisation of small structures with fewer metal artifacts. Furthermore, in 75% of patients, the angle of the chorda and facial nerve could be visualised. Significant differences in dependence of the electrode type for the relation of them to the facial nerve could be seen. In conclusion, CBCT achieves reliable visualisation and detailed imaging-based measurements of the intracochlear position of different cochlea electrodes. Additionally, clinically known differences can be reproduced. Even visualisation of the position of the electrode in the chorda-facial angle is possible. Therefore, CBCT is a useful tool in intra- and postoperative control of cochlear implants.

Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation--a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones

HYPOTHESIS

Image quality of low-dose multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) after cochlear implantation is comparable to that of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

BACKGROUND

CBCT has been described as a low-dose alternative with superior image quality to MSCT for postoperative cochlear implant (CI) imaging, but to our knowledge, no dose-matched comparisons of image quality have been published.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five human cochleae were implanted with CI electrodes and scanned on two CBCT and two MSCT systems. Four independent observers rated aspects of image quality on a five-point scale. CBCT scans were compared to clinical and dose-matched MSCT scans. Declining-dose MSCT protocols were compared to the clinical protocol. CT phantoms were used to determine effective dose and resolution for each acquisition protocol.

RESULTS

Effective dose of the CBCT protocols was 6 to 16% of the clinical MSCT dose. Visibility of cochlear inner and outer walls and overall image quality were positively correlated with radiation dose on MSCT and image quality was better with clinical MSCT than with CBCT protocols. In other comparisons, differences between systems were found, but a distinction between CBCT and MSCT could not be made.

CONCLUSION

CBCT and dose-matched MSCT are both suitable for postoperative CI imaging. Selecting a CT system and radiation dose depends on which cochlear structures need to be visualized.

The use of cone-beam computed tomography to determine cochlear implant electrode position in human temporal bones

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in the estimation of cochlear implant (CI) electrode position in implanted temporal bones.

STUDY DESIGN

Eight fresh frozen temporal bones were mounted and oriented as for standard surgery and were implanted with Cochlear Slim-Straight (SS) or Contour Advance electrode arrays by 2 CI surgeons. The bones were then imaged using an Accuitomo F170 CBCT scanner (isometric 250 μm voxel size) and were then processed for histologic sectioning (500 μm sections).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The CBCT images and the histologic micrographs (providing the "gold standard") were examined independently by several observers who assessed the scalar position (tympani or vestibuli) of each electrode in each temporal bone specimen.

RESULTS

Examination of the histologic micrographs confirmed that all electrodes were positioned within the scala tympani in all 8 bones. Similar judgments were made by the observers rating the CBCT images, except that one of the 2 observers estimated some of the apical electrodes to be located in the scala vestibuli in two of the bones implanted with the SS electrode.

CONCLUSION

Cone-beam CT imaging is able to provide a good indication of the scalar position of implanted electrodes, although estimation may be slightly less reliable for apical electrodes and for straight electrode designs. Additional advantages of using CBCT for this purpose are shorter acquisition time and reduction of radiation dose as compared with conventional CT.

HiFocus Helix™ electrode insertion: surgical approach

Background

Cochlear implants have been used for almost 30 years as a device for the rehabilitation of individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss. One of the important aspects of cochlear implantation is the type of electrode selected and proper insertion of the electrode array in scala tympani to minimize cochlear damage. The HiFocus Helix™ electrode is a precurved design aimed at placing the electrode contacts close to the spiral ganglion cells in the modiolus. The prescribed insertion techniques are intended to minimize the likelihood of damage to the basilar membrane or lateral wall of the cochlea.

Case presentation

To describe the first insertion of a HiFocus Helix™ electrode in Brazil exposing surgical particularities and device details in a patient with profound hearing loss, due to Mondini’s dysplasia.

Conclusion

No problems were encountered during the surgical procedure. The patient experienced improvement in hearing thresholds and speech perception. The HiFocus Helix™ electrode proved easy to insert and provided expected hearing benefits for the patient. This manuscript indicates that the HiResolution™ Bionic Ear System with HiFocus Helix™ electrode comprise a cochlear implant system that is practical and beneficial for the treatment of severe-to-profound hearing loss.

Influence of insertion depth in cochlear implantation on vertigo symptoms and vestibular function

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the electrode insertion depth in vestibular function after cochlear implantation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective observational study design, 41 adult patients who had undergone cochlear implantation between 2006 and 2012 at a tertiary referral university hospital were included. The postoperative performed radiograph images of the petrous bone were acquired according to the Stenvers method. These were analyzed to determine electrode insertion depth. Pre- and postoperative subjective vertigo symptoms were assessed by a questionnaire. The function of the horizontal semi-circular canal was evaluated by caloric irrigation and the function of the sacculus was tested by using cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The average electrode insertion depth was 464°. A certain variability of insertion depth existed among the different electrodes according to their designs. No statistical difference of the insertion depth was found between patients with or without vertigo. There was also no correlation between electrode insertion depth and alterations of the measurable vestibular function.

CONCLUSION

In our study the variability of insertion depth didn't have a significant influence on subjective vertigo, horizontal semi-circular canal function or saccular function. Plain radiography is a rapid, simple and cost-effective method to determine electrode insertion depth after implantation. However the scalar position of the electrode cannot be analyzed in plain radiography, so that an interscalar dislocation as a possible influence in vestibular function remains undetected.

Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes

OBJECTIVE

The round window membrane (RWM) approach is designed to provide an atraumatic approach to scala tympani implantation with the goal of enhanced preservation of hearing and vestibular receptor function. Perimodiolar electrode designs offer advantages in electrophysiologic testing. However, perimodiolar arrays have only been investigated in insertion trials using temporal bone material. The aim of the present study was to evaluate perimodiolar electrode placement in a clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospective nonrandomized study included 27 patients (October 2010 to February 2011). Due to the RWM approach, cochlear implantation electrode insertion was performed using a perimodiolar electrode array fitted with a stylet that enables movement through the first cochlear turn by withdrawing the stylet. We judged the feasibility of RWM approaches with perimodiolar electrodes and the electrode placement using flat panel detector radiography. Hearing preservation, vestibular receptor function (vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, subjective haptic vertical, and caloric irrigation), and subjective vertigo were evaluated in all RWM approaches.

RESULTS

For anatomic reasons, RWM insertions were possible in 21 cases (78%). The basilar membrane disruption rate was 19% in RWM insertions using perimodiolar electrodes. In those patients with the electrode position within the scala tympani, vestibular receptor functions and subjective vertigo remained unchanged. The residual hearing preservation was unsatisfactory. The mean pure-tone average loss was 21 dB.

CONCLUSION

We believe that if performed regularly, the RWM insertion technique has almost no negative effects on vestibular receptor function and produces no vertigo. However, cochlear hair cells may be more sensitive to electrode insertion traumas than vestibular receptor cells. The use of perimodiolar electrodes may require more atraumatic electrodes to achieve hearing preservation.

[Intracochlear electrode position: evaluation after deep insertion using cone beam computed tomography]

INTRODUCTION

Due to the increasing number of cochlear implantations (CI), postoperative radiological verification of the electrode position, e.g., with respect to quality control, plays a central role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intracochlear position of deep inserted electrodes by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CBCT data sets (Accu-I-tomo, Morita, Kyoto, Japan) of 22 patients (28 ears operated between 2008 and 2011) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent a CI (round window approach) with deep insertion of the electrode (Flex soft or standard electrode from MedEl©). CBCT data were analyzed for intracochlear position of the electrode (scala vestibuli, scala tympani, malposition between the scalae) and the certainty of this evaluation.

RESULTS

All ears could be evaluated with the status certain or relatively certain in the basal turn of the cochlea. Thereby, the electrode array was inserted into the scala tympani in 93% (n = 26). Primary insertion into the scala vestibuli and the scala media was observed in 3.5% of the ears, respectively. In the apical part of the cochlea, only 32% (n = 9 ears) could be evaluated with relative certainty. The remaining 68% of cases could not be evaluated. Of the 32% interpretable cases in the apical part of the cochlea, 25% (n = 7) were inserted into the scala tympani, 3.5% (n = 1) into the scala vestibuli, and 3.5% (n = 1) were malpositioned between the scalae.

CONCLUSION

The exact evaluation of the intracochlear position of the electrode by CBCT is only possible in the basal turn of the cochlea. In deep insertion, determination of the position in the medial and apical parts of the cochlea by CBCT is still not possible. Furthermore, the round window approach allows reliable implantation into the scala tympani.

Artifacts of the electrode in cochlea implantation and limits in analysis of deep insertion in cone beam tomography (CBT)

Until now more than 250,000 cochlea implantations have been performed worldwide. The surgical procedure is well standardized. A discussion about the kind of postoperative radiological control has started since cone beam tomography (CBT) has been established in ENT and hearing preservation operations have come more into the focus. Further research has been concentrated on the role of CBT and the insertion of the basal turn. The aim of this study was to look for the possibilities of CBT and deep insertion. The second aim was to analyze the artifacts of cochlea implants in CBT. Three human cadaver ears were implanted with a flex soft electrode of MedEl© in a standard operation procedure with round window insertion and a full insertion. Afterwards 72 CBT sets per ear were performed with different X-ray-tube currents (2-10 mA), voltages (72-90 kV), and exposure times (9 and 17 s). On each data set, the radiological diameter of the electrode 9 (basal), electrode 2 (apical), the diameter of the cable next to the electrodes 9 and 2, and the associated diameter of the cochlea next to the electrodes 9 and 2 were evaluated. Additionally, a comparison to the real diameter was done. The mean radiological diameters of the measure point at electrode 9 were: electrode = 1.19 mm; cable = 0.65 mm; cochlea = 1.77 mm. Results for measure point at electrode 2 were: electrode = 0.98 mm; cable = 0.48 mm; cochlea = 1.21 mm. The real diameters were at electrode 9 in lateral view 0.58 mm and in top view 0.63 mm and at electrode 2 in lateral view 0.36 mm and in top view 0.50 mm. Differences between the diameters of the electrode 9 and 2 were highly significant. Interestingly, the real diameter of the electrode is half in comparison to the radiological one. Also in comparison to the diameter of the cable and the associated electrode is nearly half. Nearly 50% artifact exists on radiologic evaluation of the diameter of the electrode. Varying the X-ray adjustments did not lead to optimized results. The difficulties in evaluating a cochlea electrode with CBT could be shown. The high rate of artifacts (50%) makes it extremely difficult to predict the inserted scale, especially when evaluating the intracochlear position in the medial and apical turn of the cochlea. In conclusion, until now CBT allows a relatively safe evaluation of the electrode in the basal turn, whereas in deep insertion it is not really a useful tool to answer the question of insertion trauma, implanted scale, or scale displacements.

Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach

Recent advances in cochlear implant technology have focused renewed attention on the preservation of residual hearing. The focus on preservation of residual hearing is driven by the concept of electroacoustic stimulation. This option depends on the insertion of a short cochlear implant electrode into the basal region of the cochlea while preserving native function in the apical region. The desire to preserve residual hearing has led to the development of the soft-surgery cochlear implantation technique. Here, the authors evaluate its various components. Avoiding entry of blood into the cochlea and the use of hyaluronate seem to be reasonably supported, whereas the use of topical steroids is unlikely to be beneficial. The site of entry into the cochlea, the use of contoured or straight devices, and the depth of insertion are also evaluated. The authors highlight the importance of systematic recording of outcomes and surgical events.