Identification of tumours with the CD43 only phenotype during the investigation of suspected lymphoma: a heterogeneous group not necessarily of T cell origin

Acute leukemia immunohistochemistry: a systematic diagnostic approach

CONTEXT

The diagnosis and classification of leukemia is becoming increasingly complex. Current classification schemes incorporate morphologic features, immunophenotype, molecular genetics, and clinical data to specifically categorize leukemias into various subtypes. Although sophisticated methodologies are frequently used to detect characteristic features conferring diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic implications, a thorough microscopic examination remains essential to the pathologic evaluation. Detailed blast immunophenotyping can be performed with lineage- and maturation-specific markers. Although no one marker is pathognomonic for one malignancy, a well-chosen panel of antibodies can efficiently aid the diagnosis and classification of acute leukemias.

OBJECTIVE

To review important developments from recent and historical literature. General immunohistochemical staining patterns of the most commonly encountered lymphoid and myeloid leukemias are emphasized. The goal is to discuss the immunostaining of acute leukemias when flow cytometry and genetic studies are not available.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive review was performed of the relevant literature indexed in PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and referenced medical texts. Additional references were identified in the reviewed manuscripts.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunophenotyping of blasts using an immunohistochemical approach to lymphoid and myeloid malignancies is presented. Initial and subsequent additional antibody panels are suggested to confirm or exclude each possibility in the differential diagnosis and a general strategy for diagnostic evaluation is discussed. Although the use of immunohistochemistry alone is limited and evaluation by flow cytometry and genetic studies is highly recommended, unavoidable situations requiring analysis of formalin-fixed tissue specimens arise. When performed in an optimized laboratory and combined with a careful morphologic examination, the immunohistochemical approach represents a useful laboratory tool for classifying various leukemias.

Incidence and nature of CD20-negative relapses following rituximab therapy in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a retrospective review

Re-treatment with rituximab for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) relapsing after previous rituximab therapy has recently been shown to be clinically efficacious. Although the mechanism of resistance to rituximab re-treatment in non-responding patients is unknown, it is possible that loss of CD20 expression in the relapsed NHL could be important in some patients. We examined the incidence and nature of CD20 negative relapses following rituximab therapy in aggressive B-cell NHL treated at our institution. Of a total of 18 patients who received rituximab, 13 have relapsed, with 10 patients subsequently undergoing repeat tissue biopsy. Six of these 10 patients (60%) were shown to have lost CD20 expression by either immunohistochemistry and/or flow cytometry. Furthermore, three of the six patients who relapsed with CD20-negative NHL also suffered relapses at unusual anatomical sites. We conclude that loss of CD20 expression in aggressive B-cell NHL relapsing post-rituximab therapy is common. As such, repeat tissue biopsy should be undertaken to document CD20 expression by both flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry prior to considering repeated courses of rituximab in relapsed aggressive lymphomas.