Central sensitization in patients with non-cardiac chest pain: a clinical experimental study

Mechanical experimentation of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review

The gastrointestinal (GI) organs of the human body are responsible for transporting and extracting nutrients from food and drink, as well as excreting solid waste. Biomechanical experimentation of the GI organs provides insight into the mechanisms involved in their normal physiological functions, as well as understanding of how diseases can cause disruption to these. Additionally, experimental findings form the basis of all finite element (FE) modelling of these organs, which have a wide array of applications within medicine and engineering. This systematic review summarises the experimental studies that are currently in the literature (n = 247) and outlines the areas in which experimentation is lacking, highlighting what is still required in order to more fully understand the mechanical behaviour of the GI organs. These include (i) more human data, allowing for more accurate modelling for applications within medicine, (ii) an increase in time-dependent studies, and (iii) more sophisticated in vivo testing methods which allow for both the layer- and direction-dependent characterisation of the GI organs. The findings of this review can also be used to identify experimental data for the readers' own constitutive or FE modelling as the experimental studies have been grouped in terms of organ (oesophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine or rectum), test condition (ex vivo or in vivo), number of directions studied (isotropic or anisotropic), species family (human, porcine, feline etc.), tissue condition (intact wall or layer-dependent) and the type of test performed (biaxial tension, inflation-extension, distension (pressure-diameter), etc.). Furthermore, the studies that investigated the time-dependent (viscoelastic) behaviour of the tissues have been presented.

Central Sensitization and Pain: Pathophysiologic and Clinical Insights

Central sensitization is an increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to their normal or subthreshold afferent input.

AIM

To explain how the notion of central sensitization has changed our understanding of pain conditions, discuss how this knowledge can be used to improve the management of pain, and highlight knowledge gaps that future research needs to address.

METHODS

Overview of definitions, assessment methods, and clinical implications.

RESULTS

Human pain models, and functional and molecular imaging have provided converging evidence that central sensitization occurs and is clinically relevant. Measures to assess central sensitization in patients are available; however, their ability to discriminate sensitization of central from peripheral neurons is unclear. Treatments that attenuate central sensitization are available, but the limited understanding of molecular and functional mechanisms hampers the development of target-specific treatments. The origin of central sensitization in human pain conditions that are not associated with tissue damage remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

The knowledge of central sensitization has revolutionized our neurobiological understanding of pain. Despite the limitations of clinical assessment in identifying central sensitization, it is appropriate to use the available tools to guide clinical decisions towards treatments that attenuate central sensitization. Future research that elucidates the causes, molecular and functional mechanisms of central sensitization would provide crucial progress towards the development of treatments that target specific mechanisms of central sensitization.

Thermal Grill Illusion in Post-Stroke Patients: Analysis of Clinical Features and Lesion Areas

Purpose

In the thermal grill illusion, participants experience a feeling similar to burning pain. The illusion is induced by simultaneously touching warm and cool stimuli in alternating positions. In post-stroke pain, central sensitization is caused by a variety of factors, including damage to the spinothalamic tract and shoulder pain. Because the thermal grill illusion depends on central mechanisms, it has recently been suggested that it may be a useful indicator of central sensitization. Therefore, we hypothesized that post-stroke patients who are more likely to experience central sensitization may also be more likely to experience a thermal grill sensation of pain and discomfort than the likelihood among those who are less likely to experience central sensitization. However, the effects of the thermal grill illusion in post-stroke patients have not yet been reported. In this pilot study, we conducted the thermal grill illusion procedure in post-stroke patients and analyzed the relationship between clinical somatosensory functions and thermal grill sensations. We also conducted brain imaging analysis to identify brain lesion areas that were associated with thermal grill sensations.

Patients and Methods

Twenty patients (65.7 ± 11.9 years old) with post-stroke patients participated in this study. The thermal grill illusion procedure was performed as follows: patients simultaneously touched eight water-filled copper bars, with the water temperature adjusted to provide alternate warm (40°C) and cold (20°C) stimuli.

Results

Thermal grill sensation of pain and discomfort tended to be associated with the wind-up phenomenon in bedside quantitative sensory testing and thermal grill sensation of discomfort was also related to damage to the thalamic lateral nucleus.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the thermal grill illusion might measure central sensitization, and that secondary brain hyperactivity might lead to increased thermal grill sensations.

Esophageal physiology-an overview of esophageal disorders from a pathophysiological point of view

The esophagus serves the principal purpose of transporting food from the pharynx into the stomach. A complex interplay between nerves and muscle fibers ensures that swallowing takes place as a finely coordinated event. Esophageal function can be tested by a variety of methods, endoscopy, manometry, and reflux monitoring being some of the most important. Regarding pathophysiology, motor disorders, such as achalasia, often cause dysphagia and/or chest pain. Functional esophageal disorders are a heterogeneous group with hypersensitivity as a dominant pathophysiological factor. Gastroesophageal reflux disease often causes symptoms, such as heartburn and regurgitation, and a spectrum of disease, ranging from minimal mucosal damage visible only in the microscope to esophageal ulcers and strictures in the most severe cases. Eosinophilic esophagitis is an immune-mediated condition that can result in significant dysphagia and associated luminal narrowing. In the following, we will provide an overview of the most common esophageal disorders from a combined pathophysiological and clinical view.

The Mexican consensus on non-cardiac chest pain

INTRODUCTION

Non-cardiac chest pain is defined as a clinical syndrome characterized by retrosternal pain similar to that of angina pectoris, but of non-cardiac origin and produced by esophageal, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, or psychiatric diseases.

AIM

To present a consensus review based on evidence regarding the definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain, as well as the therapeutic options for those patients.

METHODS

Three general coordinators carried out a literature review of all articles published in English and Spanish on the theme and formulated 38 initial statements, dividing them into 3 main categories: (i)definitions, epidemiology, and pathophysiology; (ii)diagnosis, and (iii)treatment. The statements underwent 3rounds of voting, utilizing the Delphi system. The final statements were those that reached >75% agreement, and they were rated utilizing the GRADE system.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The final consensus included 29 statements. All patients presenting with chest pain should initially be evaluated by a cardiologist. The most common cause of non-cardiac chest pain is gastroesophageal reflux disease. If there are no alarm symptoms, the initial approach should be a therapeutic trial with a proton pump inhibitor for 2-4weeks. If dysphagia or alarm symptoms are present, endoscopy is recommended. High-resolution manometry is the best method for ruling out spastic motor disorders and achalasia and pH monitoring aids in demonstrating abnormal esophageal acid exposure. Treatment should be directed at the pathophysiologic mechanism. It can include proton pump inhibitors, neuromodulators and/or smooth muscle relaxants, psychologic intervention and/or cognitive therapy, and occasionally surgery or endoscopic therapy.

What Is the Future of Impedance Planimetry in Gastroenterology?

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is efficient in transporting ingested material to the site of delivery in healthy subjects. A fine balance exists between peristaltic forces, the mixing and delivery of the contents, and sensory signaling. This fine balance is easily disturbed by diseases. It is mandatory to understand the pathophysiology to enhance our understanding of GI disorders. The inaccessibility and complex nervous innervation, geometry and mechanical function of the GI tract make mechanosensory evaluation difficult. Impedance planimetry is a distension technology that assesses luminal geometry, mechanical properties including muscle dynamics, and processing of nociceptive signals from the GI tract. Since standardized models do not exist for GI muscle function in vivo, models, concepts, and terminology must be borrowed from other medical fields such as cardiac mechanophysiology. The review highlights the impedance planimetric technology, muscle dynamics assessment, and 3 applied technologies of impedance planimetry. These technologies are the multimodal probes that assesses sensory function, the functional luminal imaging probe that dynamically measures the geometry of the lumen it distends, and Fecobionics that is a simulated feces providing high-resolution measurements during defecation. The advanced muscle analysis and 3 applied technologies can enhance the quality of future interdisciplinary research for gaining more knowledge about mechanical function, sensory-motor disorders, and symptoms. This is a step in the direction of individualized treatment for GI disorders based on diagnostic subtyping. There seems to be no better alternatives to impedance planimetry, but only the functional luminal imaging probe is currently commercially available. Wider use depends on commercialization of the multimodal probe and Fecobionics.

Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions

Different neuroplastic processes can occur along the nociceptive pathways and may be important in the transition from acute to chronic pain and for diagnosis and development of optimal management strategies. The neuroplastic processes may result in gain (sensitisation) or loss (desensitisation) of function in relation to the incoming nociceptive signals. Such processes play important roles in chronic pain, and although the clinical manifestations differ across condition processes, they share some common mechanistic features. The fundamental understanding and quantitative assessment of particularly some of the central sensitisation mechanisms can be translated from preclinical studies into the clinic. The clinical perspectives are implementation of such novel information into diagnostics, mechanistic phenotyping, prevention, personalised treatment, and drug development. The aims of this paper are to introduce and discuss (1) some common fundamental central pain mechanisms, (2) how they may translate into the clinical signs and symptoms across different chronic pain conditions, (3) how to evaluate gain and loss of function using quantitative pain assessment tools, and (4) the implications for optimising prevention and management of pain. The chronic pain conditions selected for the paper are neuropathic pain in general, musculoskeletal pain (chronic low back pain and osteoarthritic pain in particular), and visceral pain (irritable bowel syndrome in particular). The translational mechanisms addressed are local and widespread sensitisation, central summation, and descending pain modulation.

Significance

Central sensitisation is an important manifestation involved in many different chronic pain conditions. Central sensitisation can be different to assess and evaluate as the manifestations vary from pain condition to pain condition. Understanding central sensitisation may promote better profiling and diagnosis of pain patients and development of new regimes for mechanism based therapy. Some of the mechanisms underlying central sensitisation can be translated from animals to humans providing new options in development of therapies and profiling drugs under development.

Pharmacological and other treatment modalities for esophageal pain

Treatment of esophageal pain remains a major challenge for the clinician. Although many patients have heartburn and may respond to proton pump inhibitors, there in an unmet need for other treatment modalities in patients where there are no obvious pathological findings. Although analgesics are the mainstay in esophageal pain treatment, many patients are nonresponders to these drugs. The current concise review focuses on other systems affecting pain processing, where better understanding may serve as a framework for therapy. These are the parasympathetic nervous system, exercise, and personality profiles. Finally, treatment with analgesics for functional chest pain remains a challenge, and an overview of treatment with antidepressive drugs is provided.

[Psychophysiology of visceral pain]

The psychophysiology of visceral pain is--different from cardiac psychophysiology--much less well investigated due to the invasiveness of its methods and problems associated with reliably and reproducibly stimulating as well as recording of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite these problems, the last 30 years have documented a number of psychophysiological phenomena such as the perception (interoception) of visceral stimuli, the effect of emotions and stress on visceral sensations, and the effect of visceral processes on cortical processing. This was mainly due to the application of neurophysiological techniques (cortical imaging and stimulation) in these investigations.

Do patients with functional chest pain have neuroplastic reorganization of the pain matrix? A diffusion tensor imaging study

Background and aims

In functional chest pain (FCP) of presumed esophageal origin central nervous system hyperexcitability is generally believed to play an important role in pain pathogenesis. However, this theory has recently been challenged. Using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging, the aim was to characterize any microstructural reorganization of the pain neuromatrix in FCP patients.

Methods

13 FCP patients and 20 matched healthy controls were studied in a 3T MR scanner. Inclusion criteria were relevant chest pain, normal coronary angiogram and normal upper gastrointestinal evaluation. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (i.e. mean diffusivity of water) and fractional anisotropy (FA) (i.e. directionality of water diffusion as a measure of fiber organization) values were assessed in the secondary sensory cortex, cingulate cortex, insula, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala.

Results

Overall, including all regions, no difference in ADC and FA values was found between the patients and controls (P = 0.79 and P = 0.23, respectively). Post-hoc tests revealed no difference in ADC and FA values of the individual regions. However, a trend of patients having increased ADC in the mid insula grey matter and increased FA in the mid insula white matter was observed (both P = 0.065).

Conclusions

This explorative study suggests that microstructural reorganization of the central pain neuromatrix may not be present in well-characterized FCP patients.

Implications

This finding, together with recent neurophysiologal evidence, challenges the theory of visceral hypersensitivity due to changes in the central nervous system in FCP patients.

Central response to painful electrical esophageal stimulation in well-defined patients suffering from functional chest pain

BACKGROUND

Functional chest pain (FCP) of presumed esophageal origin is considered a common cause for chest pain in which central nervous system hyperexcitability is thought to play an important role. We aimed to compare cerebral responses with painful esophageal stimuli between FCP patients and healthy subjects (HS).

METHODS

Thirteen patients with FCP (seven females, mean age 50.4 ± 7.5 years) and 15 HS (eight females, mean age 49.1 ± 12.9 years) were enrolled. Inclusion criteria consisted of typical chest pain, normal coronary angiogram, and normal upper gastrointestinal evaluation. Electrical stimulations evoking the pain threshold were applied in the distal esophagus, while cortical evoked potentials were recorded from the scalp. Pain scores, resting electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potential characteristics and brain electrical sources to pain stimulation were compared between groups.

KEY RESULTS

No differences were seen between patients and HS regarding (i) pain thresholds (patients: 20.1 ± 7.4 mA vs HS: 22.4 ± 8.3 mA, all P > 0.05), (ii) resting-EEG (P > 0.05), (iii) evoked brain potential latencies (N2: patients 181.7 ± 25.7 mS vs HS 182.2 ± 25.8 mS, all P > 0.05) and amplitudes (N2P2: patients 8.2 ± 7.2 μV vs HS: 10.1 ± 3.4 μV, all P > 0.05), (iv) topography (P > 0.05), and (v) brain source location (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

No differences in activation of brain areas to painful esophageal stimulation were seen in this group of well characterized patients with FCP compared with sex- and age-matched HS. The mechanism of pain in FCP and whether it originates in the esophagus remains unsolved.

Exploration of the effects of gender and mild esophagitis on esophageal pain thresholds in the normal and sensitized state of asymptomatic young volunteers

BACKGROUND

Clinical data suggest gender differences in gastrointestinal pain, but very little experimental data exist. Esophageal painful thresholds to mechanical, thermal, electric, and chemical stimuli can be measured with the esophageal multimodal pain model. The aim was to measure the effect of gender and mild esophagitis on esophageal pain perception.

METHODS

Thirty-five healthy asymptomatic volunteers [19 men, median age 29 (22-56 years)] underwent upper GI endoscopy, 24 h pH/impedance measurement, and multimodal esophageal pain stimulation before and after sensitization with acid. Stimulus intensities at painful thresholds were recorded.

KEY RESULTS

Men had higher pain thresholds (PT) to mechanical stimulation (mean volume: men 20.9 ± 10 mL vs women 15.2 ± 6.8 mL, P = 0.02) and more men tolerated the maximum acid challenge (58% vs 20%, P = 0.03). There were no differences between genders for PT to (1) thermal stimulation [mean stimulation time (men, women): heat; 20 ± 5 s vs 21 ± 6 s or cold; 33.3 ± 20.1 s vs 20.7 ± 21.4 s, P > 0.2], (2) electrical current (mean current: men 17.6 ± 9.2 mA vs women 12.9 ± 3.7 mA, P = 0.11), or (3) acid volume [median volume: men 200 (20;200) mL vs women 133 (40;200) mL, P = 0.2]. Fifteen asymptomatic subjects had mild esophagitis (10 men, all Los Angeles A). There were no differences in esophageal PT between subjects with normal endoscopy or mild esophagitis (all P > 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The effects of gender and mild esophagitis on esophageal multimodal pain perception have been measured in asymptomatic volunteers. The study suggests that gender, not mild esophagitis, tends to influence mechanical and chemical esophageal pain.

Acid-suppressive therapy with esomeprazole for relief of unexplained chest pain in primary care: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

High-quality data regarding the efficacy of acid-suppressive treatment for unexplained chest pain are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of esomeprazole in primary-care treatment of patients with unexplained chest pain stratified for frequency of reflux/regurgitation symptoms.

METHODS

Patients with a ≥ 2-week history of unexplained chest pain (unrelated to gastroesophageal reflux) who had at least moderate pain on ≥ 2 of the last 7 days were stratified by heartburn/regurgitation frequency (≤ 1 day/week (stratum 1) vs. ≥ 2 days/week (stratum 2)) and randomized to 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with twice-daily esomeprazole 40 mg or placebo. Chest pain relief during the last 7 days of treatment (≤ 1 day with minimal symptoms assessed daily using a 7-point scale) was analyzed by stratum in keeping with the predetermined analysis plan.

RESULTS

Overall, 599 patients (esomeprazole: 297, placebo: 302) were randomized. In stratum 1, more esomeprazole than placebo recipients achieved chest pain relief (38.7% vs. 25.5%; P=0.018); no between-treatment difference was observed in stratum 2 (27.2% vs. 24.2%; P=0.54). However, esomeprazole was superior to placebo in a post-hoc analysis of the whole study population (combined strata; 33.1% vs. 24.9%; P=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

A 4-week course of high-dose esomeprazole provided statistically significant relief of unexplained chest pain in primary-care patients who experienced infrequent or no heartburn/regurgitation, but there was no such significant reduction in patients with more frequent reflux symptoms.

Visceral pain: the ins and outs, the ups and downs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Visceral pain represents a major clinical problem, yet far less is known about its mechanisms compared with somatic pains, for example, from cutaneous and muscular structures.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we describe the neuroanatomical bases of visceral pain signalling in the peripheral and central nervous system, comparing to somatic pains and also the channels and receptors involved in these events. We include an overview of potential new targets in the context of mechanisms of visceral pain and hypersensitivity.

SUMMARY

This review should inform on the recognition of what occurs in patients with visceral pain, why comorbidities are common and how analgesic treatments work.

The pain system in oesophageal disorders: mechanisms, clinical characteristics, and treatment

Pain is common in gastroenterology. This review aims at giving an overview of pain mechanisms, clinical features, and treatment options in oesophageal disorders. The oesophagus has sensory receptors specific for different stimuli. Painful stimuli are encoded by nociceptors and communicated via afferent nerves to the central nervous system. The pain stimulus is further processed and modulated in specific pain centres in the brain, which may undergo plastic alterations. Hence, tissue inflammation and long-term exposure to pain can cause sensitisation and hypersensitivity. Oesophageal sensitivity can be evaluated ,for example, with the oesophageal multimodal probe. Treatment should target the cause of the patient's symptoms. In gastro-oesophageal reflux diseases, proton pump inhibitors are the primary treatment option, surgery being reserved for patients with severe disease resistant to drug therapy. Functional oesophageal disorders are treated with analgesics, antidepressants, and psychological therapy. Lifestyle changes are another option with less documentation.

The esophageal multimodal pain model: normal values and degree of sensitization in healthy young male volunteers

BACKGROUND

Sensory changes are thought to be involved in gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). The esophageal multimodal pain model can be used to investigate sensations in response to distension, heat, electric current and acid.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to provide normal values for this model in the normal state and in the acid induced sensitized state.

METHODS

Fifty-three healthy men (20-38 years old) underwent esophageal stimulation with distension, heat and electrical current before and after sensitization with 0.1 N HCl acid. Stimulus intensities at painful and non-painful thresholds and referred pain areas were measured. The percentage of individual participants sensitized to each modality was calculated. In 22 subjects the pre-acid tests were repeated on three subsequent visits.

RESULTS

To reach moderate pain, subjects tolerated mean distension of 29.1 ± 11 mL, heat stimulation time of 141 ± 33 s, and mean current of 17.6 ± 6.4 mA. After acid exposure, significantly reduced thresholds were observed for mechanical (24%), heat (11%) and electrical (14%) stimulation (P values < 0.05). The percentage of subjects sensitized, defined as reductions in thresholds of ≥10% or ≥20% after acid perfusion, was as follows: for distension 77%/62%, for heat 48%/28%, and for current 58%/44%. The model showed good reliability (intra-class correlations >0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Normal values for healthy young men are now provided for the normal and the sensitized state. The percentage of subjects sensitized after acid stimulation are thoroughly documented, and depends on stimulation type and the cut-off value chosen.

Proximal and distal esophageal sensitivity is decreased in patients with Barrett’s esophagus

AIM: To investigate sensations to multimodal pain stimulation in the metaplastic and normal parts of the esophagus in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE).

METHODS: Fifteen patients with BE and 15 age-matched healthy volunteers were subjected to mechanical, thermal and electrical pain stimuli of the esophagus. Both the metaplastic part and the normal part (4 and 14 cm, respectively, above the esophago-gastric junction) were examined. At sensory thresholds the stimulation intensity, referred pain areas, and evoked brain potentials were recorded.

RESULTS: Patients were hyposensitive to heat stimulation both in the metaplastic part [median stimulation time to reach the pain detection threshold: 15 (12-34) s vs 14 (6-23) s in controls; F = 4.5, P = 0.04] and the normal part of the esophagus [median 17 (6-32) s vs 13 (8-20) s in controls; F = 6.2, P = 0.02]. Furthermore, patients were hyposensitive in the metaplastic part of the esophagus to mechanical distension [median volume at moderate pain: 50 (20-50) mL vs 33 (13-50) mL in controls; F = 5.7, P = 0.02]. No indication of central nervous system abnormalities was present, as responses were comparable between groups to electrical pain stimuli in the metaplastic part [median current evoking moderate pain: 13 (6-26) mA vs 12 (9-24) mA in controls; F = 0.1, P = 0.7], and in the normal part of the esophagus [median current evoking moderate pain: 9 (6-16) mA, vs 11 (5-11) mA in controls; F = 3.4, P = 0.07]. Furthermore, no differences were seen for the referred pain areas (P-values all > 0.3) or latencies and amplitudes for the evoked brain potentials (P-values all > 0.1).

CONCLUSION: Patients with BE are hyposensitive both in the metaplastic and normal part of esophagus likely as a result of abnormalities affecting peripheral nerve pathways.

Different effects of morphine and oxycodone in experimentally evoked hyperalgesia: a human translational study

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT * Previous studies using short-lasting experimental pain stimulations in healthy volunteers have shown differences in opioid effects regarding visceral pain stimulations. However, these differences can be more pronounced in patients due to a sensitized pain system. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to mimic the clinical situation by investigating opioid effects on experimental pain in healthy volunteers after experimentally evoked hyperalgesia. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS? * We now know that morphine and oxycodone exerts different effects in the sensitized pain system as we found a greater analgesic effect of oxycodone in response to skin, muscle and oesophageal pain stimulation. This supports clinicians' experiences that oxycodone can be superior to morphine in the treatment of some pain conditions. The evoked hyperalgesia bridged findings from studies in healthy volunteers to patients, and new fundamental knowledge on different analgesic effects in hyperalgesia was found. AIM Similar analgesics may have different analgesic potencies especially in patients in whom the pain system is sensitized. The aim was to investigate different opioid effects on experimental pain after the sensitized pain system was mimicked evoking hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers. METHODS Twenty-four healthy volunteers were randomized to treatment with morphine (30 mg orally) and oxycodone (15 mg orally) or placebo in a double-blind crossover study. Hyperalgesia was induced by oesophageal perfusion with acid and capsaicin. Several exploratory endpoints were studied using skin heat, muscle pressure and oesophageal mechanical, heat and electrical stimulation. Effects on pain from deeper structures were considered most important. RESULTS Different analgesic potencies were found. Oxycodone had a greater analgesic effect than morphine attenuating pain from: (i) heat stimulation of skin (P= 0.016); difference between the means of 0.39 degrees C, 95% CI 0.22, 2.09. (ii) muscle pressure (P < 0.001); difference between the means of 11.93kPa, 95% CI 5.4, 18.5. (iii) oesophageal heat stimulation (P < 0.001); difference between the means of 38.54 cm(2), 95% CI 15.37, 61.71 and (iv) oesophageal electrical stimulation (P= 0.016); difference between the means of 6.69mA, 95% CI 1.23, 12.13. CONCLUSION After sensitization of the pain system different analgesic potencies of morphine and oxycodone were found in response to skin, muscle and oesophageal pain stimulation, in which oxycodone had a greater effect. As similar differential analgesic potencies of the two opioids have been found in patients with chronic pain, the experimental hyperalgesia model bridged findings from studies in healthy volunteers to patients.

Sensation evoked by esophageal distension in functional chest pain patients depends on mechanical stress rather than on ischemia

BACKGROUND

Functional chest pain is commonly reproduced by bag distension in the esophageal body. It is unknown whether such pain is primarily associated with mechanical stress and strain (force-deformation) or with changes in mucosal perfusion.

METHODS

Fourteen patients (6M, 8F, average age 55.9 years) underwent ramp bag distension before and after injection of 20 mg butylscopolamine bromide (BS) using a novel bag catheter incorporating endosonography and laser Doppler perfusion monitoring. Healthy subjects served as controls. Mucosal perfusion was evaluated and stress and strain were computed and related to the sensation.

KEY RESULTS

The symptom score increased with bag volume (P < 0.001). Volume as a function of pressure was higher in patients than in controls (P < 0.001), both before and during BS. The stress-strain relationship was exponential and indicated a stiffer esophageal wall in patients especially before BS (P < 0.01). The stress-strain curves indicate increased muscle tone in the functional chest pain patients. The perfusion decreased with increasing symptom score from visual analog scale 1-7 during BS. The decrease was on average 18.9% in patients and 19.7% in controls (P = ns). Multiple regression analysis from distensions during BS showed that the discomfort/pain sensations depended on stress and strain (P < 0.001) and with stress as the largest contributor. Perfusion did not contribute.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Pain evoked by bag distension in patients with functional chest pain is stress-dependent rather than dependent on mucosal perfusion. Furthermore, the esophagus of the patients was characterized by more pronounced muscle tone during the distensions.

Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain

Nociceptor inputs can trigger a prolonged but reversible increase in the excitability and synaptic efficacy of neurons in central nociceptive pathways, the phenomenon of central sensitization. Central sensitization manifests as pain hypersensitivity, particularly dynamic tactile allodynia, secondary punctate or pressure hyperalgesia, aftersensations, and enhanced temporal summation. It can be readily and rapidly elicited in human volunteers by diverse experimental noxious conditioning stimuli to skin, muscles or viscera, and in addition to producing pain hypersensitivity, results in secondary changes in brain activity that can be detected by electrophysiological or imaging techniques. Studies in clinical cohorts reveal changes in pain sensitivity that have been interpreted as revealing an important contribution of central sensitization to the pain phenotype in patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, musculoskeletal disorders with generalized pain hypersensitivity, headache, temporomandibular joint disorders, dental pain, neuropathic pain, visceral pain hypersensitivity disorders and post-surgical pain. The comorbidity of those pain hypersensitivity syndromes that present in the absence of inflammation or a neural lesion, their similar pattern of clinical presentation and response to centrally acting analgesics, may reflect a commonality of central sensitization to their pathophysiology. An important question that still needs to be determined is whether there are individuals with a higher inherited propensity for developing central sensitization than others, and if so, whether this conveys an increased risk in both developing conditions with pain hypersensitivity, and their chronification. Diagnostic criteria to establish the presence of central sensitization in patients will greatly assist the phenotyping of patients for choosing treatments that produce analgesia by normalizing hyperexcitable central neural activity. We have certainly come a long way since the first discovery of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in the spinal cord and the revelation that it occurs and produces pain hypersensitivity in patients. Nevertheless, discovering the genetic and environmental contributors to and objective biomarkers of central sensitization will be highly beneficial, as will additional treatment options to prevent or reduce this prevalent and promiscuous form of pain plasticity.

Quantitative assessment and characterization of visceral hyperalgesia evoked by esophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion in patients with functional heartburn, nonerosive reflux disease, and erosive esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of esophageal hypersensitivity in functional heartburn (FH) with negative pH test, negative symptom index, and the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) failure has not been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the characterization of visceral hyperalgesia evoked by esophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion in patients with FH, nonerosive reflux disease, and erosive esophagitis and further characterize the pathophysiologic mechanism of FH.

METHODS

A total of 21 FH patients (with esophageal acid exposure <3.1% and a symptom index<50% and nonresponse to a therapeutic trial with proton pump inhibitors, 25 Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) patients (with esophageal acid exposure>4%), 23 erosive esophagitis (EE) patients (LA grade B to D), and 18 healthy controls were recruited in the study. Mechanosensitivity including the initial perception threshold (IPT) and pain threshold (PT) was evaluated by using a Barostat with a double-random staircase distension protocol. Chemosensitivity was graded along a visual analog scale after perfusion of saline and 0.1 N HCl.

RESULTS

The baseline IPTs and PTs were all lower in patients with FH, NERD, and EE than in the controls (all P<0.01). In addition, the baseline PT in FH patients was significantly lower than those in NERD (P=0.015) and EE patients (P<0.001). After acid perfusion, the mean symptom intensity scores were significantly greater in patients with FH, NERD, and EE than those in the controls (all P<0.001). The postacid perfusion IPTs in patients with FH, NERD, and EE were all significantly lower than the corresponding baseline values (all P<0.01). The PTs in FH (P=0.026) and EE patients (P<0.001) were significantly lower than the corresponding baseline values. Moreover, the postacid perfusion PT was significantly lower in FH patients than in NERD patients (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FH patients are more sensitive to mechanical or chemical stimuli than NERD patients. Sensitization of esophageal acid-sensitive chemoreceptors may exert a significant influence on the pressure-sensitive mechanoreceptors, and there is the cooperative interaction in the process of esophageal visceral hyperalgesia.

Acid hypersensitivity in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis

OBJECTIVE

Painful symptoms are prevalent in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis but experimental data are sparse. The aim of this study was to compare the pain response to experimental oesophageal stimulation in 14 patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis and 15 healthy volunteers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multimodal probe was placed in the oesophagus. The participants were subjected to mechanical, thermal and electrical pain stimuli followed by perfusion with 0.1 M HCl. Pain scores, referred pain areas and evoked brain potentials to electrical stimulation of the oesophagus were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients tolerated significantly less acid perfused in the oesophagus (median 123 versus 200 ml; P = 0.02) and felt the burning sensation evoked by the acid earlier (median 2.0 versus 5.0 min; P = 0.01). Eight patients had coexisting gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Six patients had pure eosinophilic oesophagitis, and this group felt the acid earlier than those with concomitant reflux or the healthy volunteers (median 0.8 versus 2.0 and 5.0 min; P = 0.03). There were no differences between patients and controls in the responses to mechanical or thermal stimulation (P > 0.4). Furthermore, no differences were found for the proxies of central nervous system sensitization (response to electrical stimulations, referred pain areas or evoked brain potentials; P > 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis are hypersensitive to acid perfused in the oesophagus, and pathophysiologic findings are likely confined to the peripheral tissue. Reflux from physiological acid may play a role in the symptoms of eosinophilic oesophagitis.

Neurophysiological evaluation of convergent afferents innervating the human esophagus and area of referred pain on the anterior chest wall

Noxious stimuli in the esophagus cause pain that is referred to the anterior chest wall because of convergence of visceral and somatic afferents within the spinal cord. We sought to characterize the neurophysiological responses of these convergent spinal pain pathways in humans by studying 12 healthy subjects over three visits (V1, V2, and V3). Esophageal pain thresholds (Eso-PT) were assessed by electrical stimulation and anterior chest wall pain thresholds (ACW-PT) by use of a contact heat thermode. Esophageal evoked potentials (EEP) were recorded from the vertex following 200 electrical stimuli, and anterior chest wall evoked potentials (ACWEP) were recorded following 40 heat pulses. The fear of pain questionnaire (FPQ) was administered on V1. Statistical data are shown as point estimates of difference +/- 95% confidence interval. Pain thresholds increased between V1 and V3 [Eso-PT: V1-V3 = -17.9 mA (-27.9, -7.9) P < 0.001; ACW-PT: V1-V3 = -3.38 degrees C (-5.33, -1.42) P = 0.001]. The morphology of cortical responses from both sites was consistent and equivalent [P1, N1, P2, N2 complex, where P1 and P2 are is the first and second positive (downward) components of the CEP waveform, respectively, and N1 and N2 are the first and second negative (upward) components, respectively], indicating activation of similar cortical networks. For EEP, N1 and P2 latencies decreased between V1 and V3 [N1: V1-V3 = 13.7 (1.8, 25.4) P = 0.02; P2: V1-V3 = 32.5 (11.7, 53.2) P = 0.003], whereas amplitudes did not differ. For ACWEP, P2 latency increased between V1 and V3 [-35.9 (-60, -11.8) P = 0.005] and amplitudes decreased [P1-N1: V1-V3 = 5.4 (2.4, 8.4) P = 0.01; P2-N2: 6.8 (3.4, 10.3) P < 0.001]. The mean P1 latency of EEP over three visits was 126.6 ms and that of ACWEP was 101.6 ms, reflecting afferent transmission via Adelta fibers. There was a significant negative correlation between FPQ scores and Eso-PT on V1 (r = -0.57, P = 0.05). These data provide the first neurophysiological evidence of convergent esophageal and somatic pain pathways in humans.

Effect of esophageal acid exposure on the cortical swallowing network in healthy human subjects

Recent studies have demonstrated common cortical activity regions associated with esophageal acidification and swallowing. The effect of sensory signals imparted on these regions by esophageal acidification on swallow-related brain activity has physiological and clinical ramifications. Our aim in this study was to determine the effect of prior, unperceived esophageal acid exposure on cortical activity associated with swallowing. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques monitored brain activity associated with volitional swallowing before and after subliminal esophageal acid stimulation. Studies were carried out in two phases. In phase I (15 healthy, right-handed subjects, age 21-49 yr, 7 female) using whole brain imaging, we documented the potentiating effects of esophageal acidification alone on swallow-related cortical activity. In phase II (10 healthy, right-handed subjects, age 20-54 yr, 5 female) using high-resolution fMRI, we measured swallow-induced regional brain activity within the cortical swallowing network before and after esophageal acidification. Unlike the phase I studies, we also tested the effect of saline perfusion alone on the cortical swallowing network in the phase II studies. Because of constraints imposed by high-resolution MRI for region-of-interest (ROI) analysis, we studied only the left hemisphere in this phase. None of the subjects developed heartburn during acid perfusion. In phase I, the number of swallow-induced activated voxels increased by 43% following esophageal acid stimulation (preacid, 44 +/- 3 voxels; postacid, 63 +/- 6 voxels; means +/- SE, P < 0.05) In phase II, contrary to saline perfusion, ROI analysis showed significantly increased regional swallow-related fMRI activity volumes as well as percent maximum signal change after esophageal acid perfusion in cingulate, prefrontal, insula, and sensory/motor regions (P < 0.05). The precuneus showed no significant change. We concluded that subliminal esophageal acid stimulation has a potentiating effect on the cortical swallowing network in healthy individuals.

Basic and clinical aspects of gastrointestinal pain

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a system of organs within multicellular animals which facilitates the ingestion, digestion, and absorption of food with subsequent defecation of waste. A complex arrangement of nerves and ancillary cells contributes to the sensorimotor apparatus required to subserve such essential functions that are with the exception of the extreme upper and lower ends of the GI tract normally subconscious. However, it also has the potential to provide conscious awareness of injury. Although this function can be protective, when dysregulated, particularly on a chronic basis, the same system can lead to considerable morbidity. The anatomical and molecular basis of gastrointestinal nociception, conditions associated with chronic unexplained visceral pain, and developments in treatment are presented in this review.

Sensory testing of the human gastrointestinal tract

The objective of this appraisal is to shed light on the various approaches to screen sensory information in the human gut. Understanding and characterization of sensory symptoms in gastrointestinal disorders is poor. Experimental methods allowing the investigator to control stimulus intensity and modality, as well as using validated methods for assessing sensory response have contributed to the understanding of pain mechanisms. Mechanical stimulation based on impedance planimetry allows direct recordings of luminal cross-sectional areas, and combined with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, the contribution of different gut layers can be estimated. Electrical stimulation depolarizes free nerve endings non-selectively. Consequently, the stimulation paradigm (single, train, tetanic) influences the involved sensory nerves. Visual controlled electrical stimulation combines the probes with an endoscopic approach, which allows the investigator to inspect and obtain small biopsies from the stimulation site. Thermal stimulation (cold or warm) activates selectively mucosal receptors, and chemical substances such as acid and capsaicin (either alone or in combination) are used to evoke pain and sensitization. The possibility of multimodal (e.g. mechanical, electrical, thermal and chemical) stimulation in different gut segments has developed visceral pain research. The major advantage is involvement of distinctive receptors, various sensory nerves and different pain pathways mimicking clinical pain that favors investigation of central pain mechanisms involved in allodynia, hyperalgesia and referred pain. As impairment of descending control mechanisms partly underlies the pathogenesis in chronic pain, a cold pressor test that indirectly stimulates such control mechanisms can be added. Hence, the methods undoubtedly represent a major step forward in the future characterization and treatment of patients with various diseases of the gut, which provides knowledge to clinicians about the underlying symptoms and treatment of these patients.

Unexplained chest/epigastric pain in patients with normal endoscopy as a predictor for ischemic heart disease and mortality: a Danish 10-year cohort study

Background

Normal upper endoscopy may be a marker of ischemic heart disease in patients with unexplained chest/epigastric pain.

Methods

We examined the 10-year risk of ischemic heart disease and mortality in a cohort of 386 Danish patients with chest/epigastric pain, normal upper endoscopy, and no prior hospital discharge diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (defined as patients with unexplained chest/epigastric pain), compared with 3,793 population controls matched by age, gender, and residence. Outcome data were obtained from population-based health registries. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the relative risk of hospitalization for ischemic heart disease and the adjusted mortality rate ratio (MRR).

Results

The 10-year relative risk of hospitalization for ischemic heart disease following a normal upper endoscopy among patients with unexplained chest/epigastric pain was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1–2.2), compared with controls. The 10-year MRR was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9–1.5). Within the first year after the upper endoscopy the MRR was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3–4.5). The cause-specific MRR among patients with unexplained chest/epigastric pain compared with controls was up to threefold higher for deaths related to alcohol dependence, pneumonia, and lung cancer.

Conclusion

Unexplained chest/epigastric pain in patients with normal endoscopy is a strong marker for ischemic heart disease and increased mortality.

Effects of the concentration and frequency of acid infusion on the development and maintenance of esophageal hyperalgesia in a human volunteer model

Previous studies have demonstrated that a single 30-min distal esophageal infusion of concentrated (0.15 M, pH 0.8) hydrochloric acid (HCl) induces hyperalgesia to an electrical stimulus in a human model. The aim of this study was to refine this model using physiological acid concentrations (pH 1.8-4) in repeated short exposures. Two different cohorts of 10 volunteers underwent two studies. Study 1: randomization to four 5-min distal esophageal infusions of acid (0.15 M) or saline, 1 h apart. Double-blind measurements of baseline and postexposure proximal esophageal and chest wall pain thresholds (PTs) were performed to electrical stimulation at 30-min intervals throughout the study. Study 2: randomization to four 15-min infusions of 0.15, 0.075, and 0.01 M HCl and saline. In study 1, with multiple acid infusions, a significant progressive drop in PTs was observed in both areas tested (P < or = 0.0001). In study 2, increasing acid concentrations had a significant effect over multiple time points, P < or = 0.0001. Similar initial reductions in PTs were observed for all acid concentrations compared with saline; however, hypersensitivity was shorter lasting with 0.01 M acid. In healthy subjects, esophageal hypersensitivity can be induced and maintained up to 4 h by repeated short-duration acid infusion and at physiological pH levels. This has implications for future model design and pathophysiological understanding of acid-related esophageal hypersensitivity.

Impaired contractility and remodeling of the upper gastrointestinal tract in diabetes mellitus type-1

AIM: To investigate that both the neuronal function of the contractile system and structural apparatus of the gastrointestinal tract are affected in patients with longstanding diabetes and auto mic neuropathy.

METHODS: The evoked esophageal and duodenal contractile activity to standardized bag distension was assessed using a specialized ultrasound-based probe. Twelve type-1 diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy and severe gastrointestinal symptoms and 12 healthy controls were studied. The geometry and biomechanical parameters (strain, tension/stress, and stiffness) were assessed.

RESULTS: The diabetic patients had increased frequency of distension-induced contractions (6.0 ± 0.6 vs 3.3 ± 0.5, P < 0.001). This increased reactivity was correlated with the duration of the disease (P = 0.009). Impaired coordination of the contractile activity in diabetic patients was demonstrated as imbalance between the time required to evoke the first contraction at the distension site and proximal to it (1.5 ± 0.6 vs 0.5 ± 0.1, P = 0.03). The esophageal wall and especially the mucosa-submucosa layer had increased thickness in the patients (P < 0.001), and the longitudinal and radial compressive stretch was less in diabetics (P < 0.001). The esophageal and duodenal wall stiffness and circumferential deformation induced by the distensions were not affected in the patients (all P > 0.14).

CONCLUSION: The impaired contractile activity with an imbalance in the distension-induced contractions likely reflects neuronal abnormalities due to autonomic neuropathy. However, structural changes and remodeling of the gastrointestinal tract are also evident and may add to the neuronal changes. This may contribute to the pathophysiology of diabetic gut dysfunction and impact on future management of diabetic patients with gastrointestinal symptoms.

Risk of gastrointestinal cancer in patients with unexplained chest/epigastric pain and normal upper endoscopy: a Danish 10-year follow-up study

Unexplained chest/epigastric pain is a common symptom in the general population. However, it has not previously been studied whether such pain could be a marker of subsequent gastrointestinal cancer. We aimed to estimate the risk of gastrointestinal cancers in a Danish 10-year follow-up study among patients with chest/epigastric pain, normal upper endoscopy, and no prior discharge diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (N = 386), compared with population controls (N = 3860). The overall 10-year risk of gastrointestinal cancer (stomach, colorectal, liver, and pancreas) was 2.9% for patients with unexplained chest/epigastric pain vs. 1.5% for controls. The adjusted relative risks <1 year and > or =1 year after upper endoscopy were 8.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-27.5) and 1.2 (95% CI, 0.5-2.9), respectively. We found that patients with unexplained chest/epigastric pain have an increased risk of gastrointestinal cancer within the first year after upper endoscopy. Consequently, unexplained chest/epigastric pain might be an early gastrointestinal cancer symptom.

Experimental human pain models in gastro-esophageal reflux disease and unexplained chest pain

Methods related to experimental human pain research aim at activating different nociceptors, evoke pain from different organs and activate specific pathways and mechanisms. The different possibilities for using mechanical, electrical, thermal and chemical methods in visceral pain research are discussed with emphasis of combinations (e.g., the multimodal approach). The methods have been used widely in assessment of pain mechanisms in the esophagus and have contributed to our understanding of the symptoms reported in these patients. Hence abnormal activation and plastic changes of central pain pathways seem to play a major role in the symptoms in some patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease and in patients with functional chest pain of esophageal origin. These findings may lead to an alternative approach for treatment in patients that does not respond to conventional medical or surgical therapy.

Multimodal pain stimulation of the gastrointestinal tract

Understanding and characterization of pain and other sensory symptoms are among the most important issues in the diagnosis and assessment of patient with gastrointestinal disorders. Methods to evoke and assess experimental pain have recently developed into a new area with the possibility for multimodal stimulation (e.g., electrical, mechanical, thermal and chemical stimulation) of different nerves and pain pathways in the human gut. Such methods mimic to a high degree the pain experienced in the clinic. Multimodal pain methods have increased our basic understanding of different peripheral receptors in the gut in health and disease. Together with advanced muscle analysis, the methods have increased our understanding of receptors sensitive to mechanical, chemical and temperature stimuli in diseases, such as systemic sclerosis and diabetes. The methods can also be used to unravel central pain mechanisms, such as those involved in allodynia, hyperalgesia and referred pain. Abnormalities in central pain mechanisms are often seen in patients with chronic gut pain and hence methods relying on multimodal pain stimulation may help to understand the symptoms in these patients. Sex differences have been observed in several diseases of the gut, and differences in central pain processing between males and females have been hypothesized using multimodal pain stimulations. Finally, multimodal methods have recently been used to gain more insight into the effect of drugs against pain in the GI tract. Hence, the multimodal methods undoubtedly represents a major step forward in the future characterization and treatment of patients with various diseases of the gut.