Substrate-dependent effects of molecular-targeted anticancer agents on activity of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1

COREGO: drug-drug interaction analysis on the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with a sarcoma: pooled analysis of the data from the REGOSARC and REGOBONE trials

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib, an antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor (MKI), showed antitumour activity in the second line of treatment for sarcomas in the phase II, randomised versus placebo, multicentre clinical trials REGOSARC (NCT01900743) and REGOBONE (NCT02389244). MKIs are drugs with a narrow therapeutic index subject to drug-drug interactions. The co-medications were not included in the trials' analyses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an ancillary exploratory analysis of the two trials to evaluate the interactions between regorafenib and patients' co-medications administered at baseline in terms of efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS)] and toxicity. The efficacy analysis was stratified according to histology groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 289 patients were included in the efficacy analysis and 339 in the toxicity analysis. Of the entire population, 71.7% of patients had at least one co-medication (median = 2, range 0-14). Overall, we found an improvement in PFS with regorafenib versus placebo (hazard ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.53, P < 0.0001). In the multivariate model adjusted on sex, histological grade, and performance status, we did not find any significant interaction between treatment effect (regorafenib versus placebo) and the co-medications on PFS. In the safety analysis, we observed no significant interaction analysis between treatment effect (regorafenib versus placebo) and the co-medications, for all the adverse events, even when considering co-medications with treatments known to be at risk of similar toxicities, or with co-medications at risk of pharmacological overdose (like cytochrome P-450 3A4 inhibitors, organic anion-transporting polypeptide inhibitors, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase inhibitors, treatments competing on protein binding). We did not find any significant interaction between regorafenib and anti-acid drugs either in the efficacy analysis (P = 0.35) or in the toxicity analysis (P = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

We did not find any significant unfavourable interaction between regorafenib and patients' co-medications, from any pharmacological class (e.g. anti-acid), either in terms of efficacy or regarding the occurrence of adverse events. These results are reassuring for the safety of regorafenib administered in association with co-medications.

Inhibition of ABC transporters by sorafenib and lenvatinib: implications for drug-induced cholestasis

Sorafenib and lenvatinib are systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. They often exhibit high intersubject pharmacokinetic variability and can cause drug-induced liver injury, yet the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Inhibition of some ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, such as bile salt export pump (BSEP; ABCB11) and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2), which are involved in bile acid disposition, may lead to cholestatic liver injury.In this study, we investigated the inhibitory effects of sorafenib and lenvatinib on selected ABC transporters in membrane vesicles and sandwich-culture human hepatocytes (SCHH) using fluorescent probe substrates.The BSEP-mediated tauro-nor-THCA-24-DBD uptake was inhibited by sorafenib, with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 30.1 μM. Transport of Lucifer yellow by BCRP was strongly inhibited by sorafenib (IC50 = 2.9 μM). Only sorafenib affected MRP2 activity (IC50 = 15.6 µM). Both drugs showed comparable inhibition potency on P-gp with IC50 values of 12.4 μM for sorafenib and 13.9 μM for lenvatinib. Unlike lenvatinib, sorafenib decreased the biliary excretion of tauro-nor-THCA-24-DBD, a probe substrate of BSEP, in SCHH by over 40%.In conclusion, sorafenib exhibited a more pronounced inhibition of ABC transporters, including BCRP, BSEP and MRP2, than lenvatinib, which could contribute to cholestatic liver injury.

Emerging Roles of Uremic Toxins and Inflammatory Cytokines in the Alteration of Hepatic Drug Disposition in Patients with Kidney Dysfunction

Patients with kidney dysfunction exhibit distinct pharmacokinetic profiles compared to those with normal kidney function. Hence, it is desirable to monitor the drug efficacy and toxicity caused by fluctuations in plasma drug concentrations associated with kidney dysfunction. Recently, pharmacokinetic information of drugs excreted mainly through the urine of patients with kidney dysfunction has been reported via drug-labeling information. Pharmacokinetic changes in drugs mainly eliminated by the liver cannot be overlooked as drug metabolism and/or transport activity in the liver may also be altered in patients with kidney dysfunction; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To plan an appropriate dosage regimen, it is necessary to clarify the underlying processes of functional changes in pharmacokinetic proteins. In recent years, uremic toxins have been shown to reduce the activity and/or expression of renal and hepatic transporters. This inhibitory effect has been reported to be time-dependent. In addition, inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6, released from immune cells activated by uremic toxins and/or kidney injury can reduce the expression levels of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters in human hepatocytes. In this mini-review, we have summarized the renal and hepatic pharmacokinetic changes as well as the potential underlying mechanisms in kidney dysfunction, such as the chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Patients with kidney dysfunction exhibit distinct pharmacokinetic profiles compared to those with normal kidney function. Increased plasma concentrations of uremic toxins and inflammatory cytokines during kidney disease may potentially affect the activities and/or expression levels of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters in the liver and kidneys.

Mechanisms of Pharmacoresistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: New Drugs but Old Problems

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignancy with poor prognosis when diagnosed at advanced stages in which curative treatments are no longer applicable. A small group of these patients may still benefit from transarterial chemoembolization. The only therapeutic option for most patients with advanced HCC is systemic pharmacological treatments based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy. Available drugs only slightly increase survival, as tumor cells possess additive and synergistic mechanisms of pharmacoresistance (MPRs) prior to or enhanced during treatment. Understanding the molecular basis of MPRs is crucial to elucidate the genetic signature underlying HCC resistome. This will permit the selection of biomarkers to predict drug treatment response and identify tumor weaknesses in a personalized and dynamic way. In this article, we have reviewed the role of MPRs in current first-line drugs and the combinations of immunotherapeutic agents with novel TKIs being tested in the treatment of advanced HCC.

In Vitro Evidence of Potential Interactions between CYP2C8 and Candesartan Acyl-β-D-glucuronide in the Liver

Growing evidence suggests that certain glucuronides function as potent inhibitors of CYP2C8. We previously reported the possibility of drug-drug interactions between candesartan cilexetil and paclitaxel. In this study, we evaluated the effects of candesartan N2-glucuronide and candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide on pathways associated with the elimination of paclitaxel, including those involving organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, OATP1B3, CYP2C8, and CYP3A4. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A10 and UGT2B7 were found to increase candesartan N2-glucuronide and candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide formation in a candesartan concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, the uptake of candesartan N2-glucuronide and candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide by cells stably expressing OATPs is a saturable process with K m of 5.11 and 12.1 μM for OATP1B1 and 28.8 and 15.7 μM for OATP1B3, respectively; both glucuronides exhibit moderate inhibition of OATP1B1/1B3. Moreover, the hydroxylation of paclitaxel was evaluated using recombinant CYP3A4 and CYP3A5. Results show that candesartan, candesartan N2-glucuronide, and candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide inhibit the CYP2C8-mediated metabolism of paclitaxel, with candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide exhibiting the strongest inhibition (IC50 is 18.9 µM for candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide, 150 µM for candesartan, and 166 µM for candesartan N2-glucuronide). However, time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C8 by candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide was not observed. Conversely, the IC50 values of all the compounds are comparable for CYP3A4. Taken together, these data suggest that candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide is actively transported by OATPs into hepatocytes, and drug-drug interactions may occur with coadministration of candesartan and CYP2C8 substrates, including paclitaxel, as a result of the inhibition of CYP2C8 function. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrates that the acyl glucuronidation of candesartan to form candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide enhances CYP2C8 inhibition while exerting minimal effects on CYP3A4, organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, and OATP1B3. Thus, candesartan acyl-β-D-glucuronide might represent a potential mediator of drug-drug interactions between candesartan and CYP2C8 substrates, such as paclitaxel, in clinical settings. This work adds to the growing knowledge regarding the inhibitory effects of glucuronides on CYP2C8.

Regulation of OATP1B1 Function by Tyrosine Kinase-mediated Phosphorylation

PURPOSE

OATP1B1 (SLCO1B1) is the most abundant and pharmacologically relevant uptake transporter in the liver and a key mediator of xenobiotic clearance. However, the regulatory mechanisms that determine OATP1B1 activity remain uncertain, and as a result, unexpected drug-drug interactions involving OATP1B1 substrates continue to be reported, including several involving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

OATP1B1-mediated activity in overexpressing HEK293 cells and hepatocytes was assessed in the presence of FDA-approved TKIs, while rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics in the presence of an OATP1B1 inhibiting TKI were measured in vivo. Tyrosine phosphorylation of OATP1B1 was determined by LC/MS-MS-based proteomics and transport function was measured following exposure to siRNAs targeting 779 different kinases.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 46 FDA-approved TKIs studied significantly inhibit OATP1B1 function. Inhibition of OATP1B1 by TKIs, such as nilotinib, is predominantly noncompetitive, can increase systemic concentrations of rosuvastatin in vivo, and is associated with reduced phosphorylation of OATP1B1 at tyrosine residue 645. Using genetic screens and functional validation studies, the Src kinase LYN was identified as a potential regulator of OATP1B1 activity that is highly sensitive to inhibition by various TKIs at clinically relevant concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel kinase-dependent posttranslational mechanism of OATP1B1 activation was identified and interference with this process by TKIs can influence the elimination of a broad range of xenobiotic substrates.

Role of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 in Drug-Drug Interactions Mediated by Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Failure to recognize important features of a drug's pharmacokinetic characteristics is a key cause of inappropriate dose and schedule selection, and can lead to reduced efficacy and increased rate of adverse drug reactions requiring medical intervention. As oral chemotherapeutic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are particularly prone to cause drug-drug interactions as many drugs in this class are known or suspected to potently inhibit the hepatic uptake transporters OATP1B1 and OATP1B3. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of the published literature and publicly-available regulatory documents in this rapidly emerging field. Our findings indicate that, while many TKIs can potentially inhibit the function of OATP1B1 and/or OATP1B3 and cause clinically-relevant drug-drug interactions, there are many inconsistencies between regulatory documents and the published literature. Potential explanations for these discrepant observations are provided in order to assist prescribing clinicians in designing safe and effective polypharmacy regimens, and to provide researchers with insights into refining experimental strategies to further predict and define the translational significance of TKI-mediated drug-drug interactions.

Molecular Bases of Drug Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The poor outcome of patients with non-surgically removable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most frequent type of primary liver cancer, is mainly due to the high refractoriness of this aggressive tumor to classical chemotherapy. Novel pharmacological approaches based on the use of inhibitors of tyrosine kinases (TKIs), mainly sorafenib and regorafenib, have provided only a modest prolongation of the overall survival in these HCC patients. The present review is an update of the available information regarding our understanding of the molecular bases of mechanisms of chemoresistance (MOC) with a significant impact on the response of HCC to existing pharmacological tools, which include classical chemotherapeutic agents, TKIs and novel immune-sensitizing strategies. Many of the more than one hundred genes involved in seven MOC have been identified as potential biomarkers to predict the failure of treatment, as well as druggable targets to develop novel strategies aimed at increasing the sensitivity of HCC to pharmacological treatments.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Transarterial Chemoembolization and Targeted Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is based on a multidisciplinary decision tree. Treatment includes loco-regional therapy, mainly transarterial chemoembolization, for intermediate-stage HCC and systemic therapy with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for advanced HCC. Transarterial chemoembolization involves hepatic intra-arterial infusion with either conventional procedure or drug-eluting-beads. The aim of the loco-regional procedure is to deliver treatment as close as possible to the tumor both to embolize the tumor area and to enhance efficacy and minimize systemic toxicity of the anticancer drug. Pharmacokinetic studies applied to transarterial chemoembolization are rare and pharmacodynamic studies even rarer. However, all available studies lead to the same conclusions: use of the transarterial route lowers systemic exposure to the cytotoxic drug and leads to much higher tumor drug concentrations than does a similar dose via the intravenous route. However, reproducibility of the procedure remains a major problem, and no consensus exists regarding the choice of anticancer drug and its dosage. Systemic therapy with TKIs is based on sorafenib and lenvatinib as first-line treatment and regorafenib and cabozantinib as second-line treatment. Clinical use of TKIs is challenging because of their complex pharmacokinetics, with high liver metabolism yielding both active metabolites and their common toxicities. Changes in liver function over time with the progression of HCC adds further complexity to the use of TKIs. The challenges posed by TKIs and the HCC disease process means monitoring of TKIs is required to improve clinical management. To date, only partial data supporting sorafenib monitoring is available. Results from further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies of these four TKIs are eagerly awaited and are expected to permit such monitoring and the development of consensus guidelines.

Interaction between phytotherapy and oral anticancer agents: prospective study and literature review

Cancer is becoming more prevalent in elderly patient. Due to polypharmacy, older adults with cancer are predisposed to drug-drug interactions. There is also an increasing interest in the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Thirty to seventy percent of patients with cancer have used CAM. Through pharmaceutical counseling sessions, we can provide advices on herb-drug interactions (HDI). All the patients seen in pharmaceutical counseling sessions were prospectively included. Information was collected during these sessions: prescribed medication (oral anticancer agents (OAA) and other drugs), CAM (phytotherapy especially), and use of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. If pharmacist considered an interaction or an intervention clinically relevant, the oncologist was notified. Then, a literature review was realized to identify the potential HDI (no interactions, precautions for use, contraindication). Among 201 pharmacist counseling sessions, it resulted in 104 interventions related to 46 HDI, 28 drug-drug interactions and 30 others (wrong dosage, omission…). To determine HDI, we review 73 medicinal plants which are used by our patients with cancer and 31 OAA. A total of 1829 recommendations were formulated about 59 (75%) medical plants and their interaction with an OAA. Herb-drug interactions should not be ignored by healthcare providers in their management of cancer patients in daily practice.

Hepatocyte Concentrations of Imaging Compounds Associated with Transporter Inhibition: Evidence in Perfused Rat Livers

In the liver, several approaches are used to investigate and predict the complex issue of drug-induced transporter inhibition. These approaches include in vitro assays and pharmacokinetic models that predict how inhibitors modify the systemic and liver concentrations of the victim drugs. Imaging is another approach that shows how inhibitors might alter liver concentrations stronger than systemic concentrations. In perfused rat livers associated with a gamma counter that measures liver concentrations continuously, we previously showed how fluxes across transporters generate the hepatocyte concentrations of two clinical imaging compounds, one with a low extraction ratio [gadobenate dimeglumine (BOPTA)] and one with a high extraction ratio [mebrofenin (MEB)]. BOPTA and MEB are transported by rat organic anion transporting polypeptide and multiple resistance-associated protein 2, which are both inhibited by rifampicin. The aim of the study is to measure how rifampicin modifies the hepatocyte concentrations and membrane clearances of BOPTA and MEB and to determine whether these compounds might be used to investigate transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions in clinical studies. We show that rifampicin coperfusion greatly decreases BOPTA hepatocyte concentrations, but increases those of MEB. Rifampicin strongly decreases BOPTA hepatic clearance. In contrast, rifampicin decreases moderately MEB hepatic clearance and blocks the biliary intrinsic clearance, increasing MEB hepatocyte concentrations. In conclusion, low concentrations prevent the quantification of BOPTA biliary intrinsic clearance, while MEB is a promising imaging probe substrate to evidence transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions when inhibitors act on influx and efflux transporters.