Neural Mechanisms in Infantile Esotropia: What Goes Wrong?

Decorrelation of cerebral visual inputs as the sufficient cause of infantile esotropia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Human infants at greatest risk for esotropia are those who suffer cerebral insults that could decorrelate signals from the two eyes during an early critical period of binocular, visuomotor development. The authors reared normal infant monkeys under conditions of binocular decorrelation to determine if this alone was sufficient to cause esotropia, and associated behavioral as well as neuroanatomic deficits.

METHODS

Binocular decorrelation was imposed using prism-goggles for durations of 3-24 weeks (control monkeys wore plano goggles), emulating unrepaired strabismus of durations 3 months to 2 years in human infants. Behavioral recordings were obtained, followed by neuroanatomic analysis of ocular dominance columns and binocular, horizontal connections in the striate visual cortex (area V1).

RESULTS

Concomitant, constant esotropia developed in each monkey exposed to decorrelation for a duration of 6-24 weeks. The severity of ocular motor signs (esotropia angle; dissociated vertical deviation; latent nystagmus; pursuit / optokinetic tracking asymmetry; fusional vergence deficits), and the loss of V1 binocular connections increased as a function of decorrelation duration. Stereopsis was deficient and motion visually evoked potentials were asymmetric. Monkeys exposed to decorrelation for 3 weeks showed transient esotropia, but regained normal alignment, visuomotor behaviors, and binocular V1 connections.

CONCLUSIONS

Binocular decorrelation is a sufficient cause of infantile esotropia when imposed during a critical period of visuomotor development. The systematic relationship between severity of visuomotor signs and severity of V1 connectivity deficits provides a neuroanatomic mechanism for these signs. Restoration of binocular fusion and V1 connections after short durations of decorrelation helps explain the benefits of early strabismus repair in humans.

The neural mechanism for Latent (fusion maldevelopment) nystagmus

Latent nystagmus (LN) is the by-product of fusion maldevelopment in infancy. Because fusion maldevelopment--in the form of strabismus and amblyopia--is common, LN is a prevalent form of pathologic nystagmus encountered in clinical practice. It originates as an afferent visual pathway disorder. To unravel the mechanism for LN, we studied patients and nonhuman primates with maldeveloped fusion. These experiments have revealed that loss of binocular connections within striate cortex (area V1) in the first months of life is the necessary and sufficient cause of LN. The severity of LN increases systematically with longer durations of binocular decorrelation and greater losses of V1 connections. Decorrelation durations that exceed the equivalent of 2-3 months in human development result in an LN prevalence of 100%. No manipulation of brain stem motor pathways is required. The binocular maldevelopment originating in area V1 is passed on to downstream extrastriate regions of cerebral cortex that drive conjugate gaze, notably MSTd. Conjugate gaze is stable when MSTd neurons of the right and left cerebral hemispheres have balanced binocular activity. Fusion maldevelopment in infancy causes unbalanced monocular activity. If input from one eye dominates and the other is suppressed, MSTd in one hemisphere becomes more active. Acting through downstream projections to the ipsilateral nucleus of the optic tract, the eyes are driven conjugately to that side. The unbalanced MSTd drive is evident as the nasalward gaze-holding bias of LN when viewing with either eye.

Timing of surgery for infantile esotropia: sensory and motor outcomes

Infantile esotropia is a common ophthalmic disorder in childhood. It is often accompanied by profound maldevelopment of stereopsis, motion processing, and eye movements, despite successful surgical realignment of the eyes. The proper timing of surgery has been debated for decades. There is growing evidence from clinical and animal studies that surgery during the early critical periods enhances sensory and ocular motor development. The Congenital Esotropia Observational Study has defined a clinical profile of infants who will benefit most from early surgery, and several other studies have shown that early surgery does not lead to adverse long-term effects. Clinicians now should consider offering early surgery to patients with large-angle, constant infantile esotropia at or before 10 months of age.

Can ophthalmologists repair the brain in infantile esotropia? Early surgery, stereopsis, monofixation syndrome, and the legacy of Marshall Parks

Can ophthalmologists repair defects of visual cortex circuitry in infants who have esotropia? The answer to this question encompasses both sensory and motor behaviors because the clinical hallmarks of the disorder are stereoblindness and absence of motor fusion, which manifests as convergently deviated eyes. Functional recovery of sensory and motor fusion in infantile esotropia was a consuming interest, if not career-defining passion, of Marshall Parks. The purpose of this work is to pay tribute to Parks' legacy by showing how human and animal studies, conducted largely during the last 25 years, support both his clinical insights and treatment philosophy.

Early versus delayed repair of infantile strabismus in macaque monkeys: I. ocular motor effects

INTRODUCTION

The appropriate age for surgical correction of esotropic strabismus in human infants is controversial; some clinicians advocate surgery before age 6 months, and others recommend observation and surgery at older ages. Infantile (congenital) esotropia in humans and monkeys is known to be accompanied by a constellation of eye movement abnormalities caused by maldevelopment of cerebral visual motor pathways. The purpose of this study was to determine how early versus delayed correction of strabismus influences development and/or maldevelopment of these eye movement pathways.

METHODS

Optical strabismus was created in infant macaques by fitting them with prism goggles on day 1 of life. The early correction group (2 experimental and 1 control) wore the goggles for a period of 3 weeks (the equivalent of 3 months before surgical repair in humans). The delayed correction group (3 experimental and 1 control) wore the goggles for a period of 3 or 6 months (the equivalent of 12 or 24 months before surgical repair in humans). Several months after the goggles were removed, the monkeys were trained to perform visual fixation, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) tasks for a juice reward. Eye movements were recorded using binocular search coils. The performance of the early versus delayed infant monkey groups was also compared with that of a group of adult monkeys who had unrepaired, naturally occurring infantile esotropia.

RESULTS

Early correction monkeys developed normal eye movements and exhibited ocular motor behaviors that were indistinguishable from normal control animals. They regained normal binocular eye alignment and showed stable fixation (no latent nystagmus). Monocular horizontal smooth pursuit and large field OKN were symmetric. In contrast, delayed correction monkeys showed persistent esotropia, latent fixation nystagmus, dissociated vertical deviation, and pursuit/OKN asymmetry. Animals who had the longest delay in correction of the optical strabismus exhibited eye movement abnormalities as severe as those of adult animals with uncorrected, natural esotropia.

CONCLUSIONS

Early correction of strabismus in primates prevents maldevelopment of eye movements driven by cerebral motor pathways. Our results provide additional evidence that early strabismus correction may be beneficial for brain development in human infants.