1
|
Boland ST, Nylen A, Bates M, Alejandria MC, Grace R, Tayyeb Z, Levine AC. Armed actor interventions in humanitarian and public health crises: examining perspectives of crisis-affected community members. Confl Health 2024; 18:33. [PMID: 38632646 PMCID: PMC11025275 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-024-00593-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite frequently providing non-military services in times of crisis, little systematic research has examined the perspectives of crisis-affected community members on the role of armed actors responding to humanitarian crises and public health emergencies. METHODS To address this research gap, 175 interviews were conducted (2020-2021) amongst humanitarian and public health practitioners; armed actors; and crisis-affected community members across three country and four crisis contexts. Specifically, this effort included an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; a refugee crisis on the Jordanian-Syrian border; and a volcanic eruption and COVID-19 outbreak in the Philippines. Data was analysed using grounded theory principles. RESULTS Crisis-affected community members held diverse views. Non-state armed groups (NSAGs) and government armed actors were characterised as antagonists by some but supportive by others; gender issues were central to perceptions of armed actors, in ways that were both prejudicing and favourable. Overall perception was most closely linked to armed actor roles rather than the relative amount of conflict in a given area. CONCLUSIONS Findings nuance the relevant literature characterizing NSAGs as disruptive agents, and also the relevant literature that does not fully consider the nuances of gender and armed actor roles as deeply relevant to crisis-affected community perspectives on armed actors. These findings have important implications for both policy and academic discourse on militarization and localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel T Boland
- Chatham House, 10 St James's Square, London, SW1Y 4LE, United Kingdom.
| | - Alexandria Nylen
- Brown University, 69 Brown Street, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, USA
| | - Madison Bates
- Brown University, 69 Brown Street, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, USA
| | | | - Rob Grace
- Boston University, Commonwealth Ave, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, USA
| | - Zein Tayyeb
- Brown University, 69 Brown Street, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, USA
| | - Adam C Levine
- Brown University, 69 Brown Street, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boland ST, Balabanova D, Mayhew S. Examining the militarised hierarchy of Sierra Leone's Ebola response and implications for decision making during public health emergencies. Global Health 2023; 19:89. [PMID: 37993942 PMCID: PMC10664671 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00995-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In September, 2014, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) called for militarised assistance in response to the rapidly escalating West Africa Ebola Epidemic. Soon after, the United Kingdom deployed its military to Sierra Leone, which (among other contributions) helped to support the establishment of novel and military-led Ebola Virus Disease (Ebola) response centres throughout the country. To examine these civil-military structures and their effects, 110 semi-structured interviews with civilian and military Ebola Response Workers (ERWs) were conducted and analysed using neo-Durkheimian theory. RESULTS The hierarchical Ebola response centres were found to be spaces of 'conflict attenuation' for their use of 'rule-bound niches', 'neutral zones', 'co-dependence', and 'hybridity', thereby not only easing civil-military relationships (CMRel), but also increasing the efficiency of their application to Ebola response interventions. Furthermore, the hierarchical response centres were also found to be inclusive spaces that further increased efficiency through the decentralisation and localisation of these interventions and daily decision making, albeit for mostly privileged groups and in limited ways. CONCLUSIONS This demonstrates how hierarchy and localisation can (and perhaps should) go hand-in-hand during future public health emergency responses as a strategy for more robustly including typically marginalised local actors, while also improving necessary efficiency-in other words, an 'inclusive hierarchical coordination' that is both operationally viable and an ethical imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel T Boland
- Centre for Universal Health, Chatham House, 10 St James's Square, London, SW1Y 4LE, UK.
| | - Dina Balabanova
- Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Susannah Mayhew
- Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boland ST, Balabanova D, Mayhew S. The political economy of expedience: examining perspectives on military support to Sierra Leone's Ebola response. Confl Health 2023; 17:53. [PMID: 37932772 PMCID: PMC10626636 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-023-00553-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The 2013-2016 West Africa Ebola Epidemic is the largest outbreak of Ebola in history. By September, 2014 the outbreak was worsening significantly, and the international president of Médecins Sans Frontières called for military assistance. In Sierra Leone, the British and Sierra Leonean militaries intervened. They quickly established a National Ebola Response Centre and a constituent network of District Ebola Response Centres. Thereafter, these inherently militarised centres are where almost all Ebola response activities were coordinated. In order to examine perspectives on the nature of the militaries' intervention, 110 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted and analysed. Military support to Sierra Leone's Ebola response was felt by most respondents to be a valuable contribution to the overall effort to contain the outbreak, especially in light of the perceived weakness of the Ministry of Health and Sanitation to effectively do so. However, a smaller number of respondents emphasised that the military deployments facilitated various structural harms, including for how the perceived exclusion of public institutions (as above) and other local actors from Ebola response decision making was felt to prevent capacity building, and in turn, to limit resilience to future crises. The concurrent provision of life-saving assistance and rendering of structural harm resulting from the militaries' intervention is ultimately found to be part of a vicious cycle, which this article conceptualises as the 'political economy of expedience', a paradox that should be considered inherent in any militarised intervention during humanitarian and public health crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel T Boland
- Centre for Universal Health, Chatham House, 10 St James's Square, London, SW1Y 4LE, UK.
| | - Dina Balabanova
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Susannah Mayhew
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pasquini M. Mistrustful Dependency: Mistrust as Risk Management in an Italian Emergency Department. Med Anthropol 2023; 42:579-592. [PMID: 37526633 DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2023.2240942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Mistrust is increasingly a daily reality of healthcare delivery worldwide. Yet it remains understudied as a form of relationship and a force in its own right. I address this gap through the ethnography of an Italian Emergency Department (ED), where conflicts have increased since the 2008 financial crisis. I show how mistrust does not result in a breakdown of healthcare interactions. Rather, mistrust is used in ambivalent care relationships to negotiate the roles, the risks, and the power that patients and staff are willing to entrust to others. Mistrust manifests in risk management strategies within relationships of "mistrustful dependency."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko Pasquini
- Centre for Medical Humanities, Department of History of Science and Ideas and Department of Cultural Anthropology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Knowledge exchange in crisis settings: A scoping review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282080. [PMID: 36827258 PMCID: PMC9956070 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public health practice and efforts to improve the social determinants of health operate within a climate characterised by multiple and intersecting crises. This includes the Covid-19 pandemic as well as more protracted crises such as climate change and persistent social inequalities that impact health. We sought to understand and compare how knowledge exchange (KE) processes occur across different crises, and how knowledge on improving social determinants of health can be utilised at times of crisis to reduce health inequalities and strengthen public systems. METHODS We conducted a scoping review to understand how KE on improving social determinants of health can occur across different types of crises (e.g. environmental, pandemics, humanitarian). Relevant studies were identified through electronic searching of Medline, EMBASE, Global Health, Scopus and Web of Science databases. RESULTS We identified 86 studies for inclusion in the review. Most studies concerned pandemic or environmental crises. Fewer studies explored KE during technical (e.g. nuclear), terror-related or humanitarian crises. This may reflect a limitation of the searches. Few studies assessed KE as part of longer-term responses to social and economic impacts of crises, with studies more likely to focus on immediate response or early recovery stages. Exchange of research evidence or data with policy or practice contextual knowledge was common but there was variation in the extent that lay (public) knowledge was included as part of KE processes. CONCLUSION As ongoing crises continue with significant public health implications, KE processes should appropriately reflect the complexity inherent in crises and foreground health inequalities. Doing so could include the utilisation of systems or complexity-informed methods to support planning and evaluation of KE, a greater focus on KE to support action to address social determinants of health, and the inclusion of a plurality of knowledge-including lived experience-in planning and responding to crises.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee SJ, Vernooij E, Enria L, Kelly AH, Rogers J, Ansumana R, Bangura MH, Lees S, Street A. Human preparedness: Relational infrastructures and medical countermeasures in Sierra Leone. Glob Public Health 2022; 17:4129-4145. [PMID: 36168658 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2110917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This paper examines health worker experiences in two areas of post-epidemic preparedness in Sierra Leone - vaccine trials and laboratory strengthening - to reflect on the place of people in current models of epidemic response. Drawing on ethnographic research and interviews with health workers in the aftermath of Ebola, it explores the hopes and expectations that interventions foster for frontline workers in under-resourced health systems, and describes the unseen work involved in sustaining robust response infrastructures. Our analysis focuses on what it means for the people who sustain health systems in an emergency to be 'prepared' for an epidemic. Human preparedness entails more than the presence of a labour force; it involves building and maintaining 'relational infrastructures', often fragile social and moral relationships between health workers, publics, governments, and international organisations. The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the value of rethinking human resources from an anthropological perspective, and investing in the safety and support of people at the forefront of response. In describing the labour, personal losses, and social risks undertaken by frontline workers for protocols and practicality to meet in an emergency context, we describe the social process of preparedness; that is, the contextual engineering and investment that make response systems work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shona J Lee
- School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Eva Vernooij
- School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Luisa Enria
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ann H Kelly
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - James Rogers
- Laboratory Technical Working Group, Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Rashid Ansumana
- School of Community Health Sciences, Njala University, Bo, Sierra Leone
| | - Mahmood H Bangura
- College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Shelley Lees
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Alice Street
- School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Epidemics and the Military: Responding to COVID-19 in Uganda. Soc Sci Med 2022; 314:115482. [PMID: 36370659 PMCID: PMC9617651 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The UN Security Council's response to Ebola in 2014 legitimised militarised responses. It also influenced responses to COVID-19 in some African countries. Yet, little is known about the day-to-day impacts for ordinary citizens of mobilising armies for epidemic control. Drawing on 18 months ethnographic research, this article analyses militarised responses to COVID-19 during, and following, two lockdowns at contrasting sites in Uganda: a small town in Pakwach district and a village in Kasese district. Both field sites lie close to the border of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Although the practice of health security varied between sites, the militarised response had more impact than the disease in these two places. The armed forces scaled back movement from urban conurbations to rural and peri-urban areas; while simultaneously enabling locally based official public authorities to use the proclaimed priorities of President Museveni's government to enhance their position and power. This led to a situation whereby inhabitants created new modes of mutuality to resist or subvert the regulations being enforced, including the establishment of new forms of cross-border movement. These findings problematise the widely held view that Uganda's response to COVID-19 was successful. Overall, it is argued that the on-going securitisation of global health has helped to create the political space to militarise the response. While this has had unknown effects on the prevalence of COVID-19, it has entrenched unaccountable modes of public authority and created a heightened sense of insecurity on the ground. The tendency to condone the violent practice of militarised public health programmes by international and national actors reflects a broader shift in the acceptance of more authoritarian forms of governance.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sams K. Fearnley, Lyle. Virulent zones: animal disease and global health at China's pandemic epicenter. 288 pp., illus., bibliogr. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press, 2020. £20.99 (paper)Keck, Frédéric. Avian reservoirs: virus hunters and birdwatchers in Chinese sentinel posts. x, 245 pp., illus., bibliogr. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press, 2020. £20.99 (paper)Porter, Natalie. Viral economies: bird flu experiments in Vietnam. 240 pp., illus., bibliogr. Chicago: Univ. Press, 2019. £22.00 (paper). JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL INSTITUTE 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.13782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
9
|
Rhodes T, Lancaster K. Making pandemics big: On the situational performance of Covid-19 mathematical models. Soc Sci Med 2022; 301:114907. [PMID: 35303668 PMCID: PMC8917648 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we trace how mathematical models are made 'evidence enough' and 'useful for policy'. Working with the interview accounts of mathematical modellers and other scientists engaged in the UK Covid-19 response, we focus on two weeks in March 2020 prior to the announcement of an unprecedented national lockdown. A key thread in our analysis is how pandemics are made 'big'. We follow the work of one particular device, that of modelled 'doubling-time'. By following how modelled doubling-time entangles in its assemblage of evidence-making, we draw attention to multiple actors, including beyond models and metrics, which affect how evidence is performed in relation to the scale of epidemic and its policy response. We draw attention to: policy; Government scientific advice infrastructure; time; uncertainty; and leaps of faith. The 'bigness' of the pandemic, and its evidencing, is situated in social and affective practices, in which uncertainty and dis-ease are inseparable from calculus. This materialises modelling in policy as an 'uncomfortable science'. We argue that situational fit in-the-moment is at least as important as empirical fit when attending to what models perform in policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Rhodes
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
White S, Mutula AC, Buroko MM, Heath T, Mazimwe FK, Blanchet K, Curtis V, Dreibelbis R. How does handwashing behaviour change in response to a cholera outbreak? A qualitative case study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266849. [PMID: 35413080 PMCID: PMC9004767 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Handwashing with soap has the potential to curb cholera transmission. This research explores how populations experienced and responded to the 2017 cholera outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and how this affected their handwashing behaviour. Methods Cholera cases were identified through local cholera treatment centre records. Comparison individuals were recruited from the same neighbourhoods by identifying households with no recent confirmed or suspected cholera cases. Multiple qualitative methods were employed to understand hand hygiene practices and their determinants, including unstructured observations, interviews and focus group discussions. The data collection tools and analysis were informed by the Behaviour Centred Design Framework. Comparisons were made between the experiences and practices of people from case households and participants from comparison households. Results Cholera was well understood by the population and viewed as a persistent and common health challenge. Handwashing with soap was generally observed to be rare during the outbreak despite self-reported increases in behaviour. Across case and comparison groups, individuals were unable to prioritise handwashing due to competing food-scarcity and livelihood challenges and there was little in the physical or social environments to cue handwashing or make it a convenient, rewarding or desirable to practice. The ability of people from case households to practice handwashing was further constrained by their exposure to cholera which in addition to illness, caused profound non-health impacts to household income, productivity, social status, and their sense of control. Conclusions Even though cholera outbreaks can cause disruptions to many determinants of behaviour, these shifts do not automatically facilitate an increase in preventative behaviours like handwashing with soap. Hygiene programmes targeting outbreaks within complex crises could be strengthened by acknowledging the emic experiences of the disease and adopting sustainable solutions which build upon local disease coping mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sian White
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Anna C. Mutula
- Independent Consultant, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | | | | | | | - Karl Blanchet
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Val Curtis
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Dreibelbis
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Storer E, Dawson K, Fergus CA. Covid-19 Riskscapes: Viral Risk Perceptions in the African Great Lakes. Med Anthropol 2022; 41:387-403. [PMID: 35286216 DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2022.2047675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
In this article we explore Covid-19 riskscapes across the African Great Lakes region. Drawing on fieldwork across Uganda and Malawi, our analysis centers around how two mobile, trans-border figures - truck drivers and migrant traders - came to be understood as shifting, yet central loci of perceived viral risk. We argue that political decision-making processes, with specific reference to the influence of Covid-19 testing regimes and reported disease metrics, aggravated antecedent geographies of blame targeted at mobile "others". We find that using grounded riskscapes to examine localised renditions of risk reveals otherwise neglected forms of discriminatory discourse and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Storer
- Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Kate Dawson
- Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Cristin A Fergus
- Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Drotbohm H. O Cuidado além do Reparo. MANA 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/1678-49442022v28n1a206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Resumo Importar-se com os outros e cuidar dos outros - sejam outras pessoas, coletividades, plantas, animais ou o clima - é um ato cotidiano e recorrente. Em algum momento da vida, quase todos os seres humanos precisam ser cuidados, são cuidados e, por fim, cuidam. Na antropologia, a noção crítica de cuidado constitui uma ferramenta analítica para considerar seriamente as contingências da vida e para compreender os modos como as pessoas atribuem sentido a diferentes tipos de atos, atitudes e valores. Este artigo argumenta que a dimensão normativa do conceito é parte de um binarismo cultural que hierarquiza o mundo de acordo com esferas da existência às quais são atribuídos valores distintos. Concentrando-se nesta normatividade como algo intrínseco à noção, o artigo estabelece uma distinção entre três campos empíricos complementares: o cuidado como reprodução social (globalizada), o cuidado como assimetria institucionalizada, e o cuidado para além do excepcionalismo humano. Fica claro que o cuidado oscila entre duas perspectivas distintas, produzindo uma tensão específica: por um lado, o conceito de cuidado apresenta uma dimensão protetora e conservadora ligada ao passado, por outro, incorpora uma dimensão transformativa por meio de suas noções de desenvolvimento, progresso e aprimoramento. Para ir além de nossa própria concepção (potencial ou inevitavelmente) acadêmica, eurocêntrica ou humanocêntrica da noção de cuidado, este ensaio sugere levar “o cuidado além do reparo”: podemos fazê-lo, em primeiro lugar, indagando qual é o papel da pesquisa nesta ética da diferenciação e, em seguida, identificando perspectivas e posicionalidades as quais, à primeira vista, parecem indistintas ou desarticuladas e, por isso, desafiam categorias já familiares de avaliação e distinção. Encarado desta maneira, o cuidado além do reparo nos chama a atenção para o fazer e o desfazer da existência humana.
Collapse
|
13
|
MacGregor H, Leach M, Akello G, Sao Babawo L, Baluku M, Desclaux A, Grant C, Kamara F, Martineau F, Yei Mokuwa E, Parker M, Richards P, Sams K, Sow K, Wilkinson A. Negotiating Intersecting Precarities: COVID-19, Pandemic Preparedness and Response in Africa. Med Anthropol 2022; 41:19-33. [PMID: 34994676 PMCID: PMC8820371 DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2021.2015591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
This article shares findings on COVID-19 in Africa across 2020 to examine concepts and practices of epidemic preparedness and response. Amidst uncertainties about the trajectory of COVID-19, the stages of emergency response emerge in practice as interconnected. We illustrate how complex dynamics manifest as diverse actors interpret and modify approaches according to contexts and experiences. We suggest that the concept of "intersecting precarities" best captures the temporalities at stake; that these precarities include the effects of epidemic control measures; and that people do not just accept but actively negotiate these intersections as they seek to sustain their lives and livelihoods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley MacGregor
- Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, BrightonUK,CONTACT Hayley MacGregor Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, BrightonBN1 9RE, UK
| | - Melissa Leach
- Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, BrightonUK
| | - Grace Akello
- Department of Mental Health, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda
| | | | - Moses Baluku
- Department of Mental Health, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda
| | - Alice Desclaux
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), MontpellierFrance
| | - Catherine Grant
- Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, BrightonUK
| | | | - Fred Martineau
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | | | - Melissa Parker
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | | | - Kelley Sams
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), MontpellierFrance
| | - Khoudia Sow
- Infectious Diseases Department, CRCF, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Annie Wilkinson
- Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, BrightonUK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kirk T, Green D, Allen T, Carayannis T, Bazonzi J, Ndala J, Stys P, Muzuri P, Nyenyezi A, Vlassenroot K, Nyuon ADA, Macdonald A, Owor A, Storer L, Okello J, Hopwood J, Porter H, Oryem R, Parker M, Akello G. Crisis responses, opportunity, and public authority during Covid-19's first wave in Uganda, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and South Sudan. DISASTERS 2021; 45 Suppl 1:S195-S215. [PMID: 34553404 PMCID: PMC8652749 DOI: 10.1111/disa.12513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Discussions on African responses to Covid-19 have focused on the state and its international backers. Far less is known about a wider range of public authorities, including chiefs, humanitarians, criminal gangs, and armed groups. This paper investigates how the pandemic provided opportunities for claims to and contests over power in Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and South Sudan. Ethnographic research is used to contend that local forms of public authority can be akin to miniature sovereigns, able to interpret dictates, policies, and advice as required. Alongside coping with existing complex protracted emergencies, many try to advance their own agendas and secure benefits. Those they seek to govern, though, do not passively accept the new normal, instead often challenging those in positions of influence. This paper assesses which of these actions and reactions will have lasting effects on local notions of statehood and argues for a public authorities lens in times of crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Kirk
- Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
| | - Duncan Green
- Professor in Practice at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
| | - Tim Allen
- Professor at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
| | | | - José Bazonzi
- Researcher at the University of KinshasaDemocratic Republic of the Congo
| | - José Ndala
- Researcher at the University of GbadoliteDemocratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Patrycja Stys
- Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
| | - Papy Muzuri
- Independent ResearcherDemocratic Republic of the Congo
| | | | | | | | - Anna Macdonald
- Assistant Professor at the University of East AngliaUnited Kingdom
| | - Arthur Owor
- Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
- Researcher at the Centre for African ResearchUganda
| | - Liz Storer
- Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
| | - Joseph Okello
- Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
| | - Julian Hopwood
- Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
| | - Holly Porter
- Assistant Professor at the University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Robin Oryem
- Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
| | - Melissa Parker
- Professor at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUnited Kingdom
| | - Grace Akello
- Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hilhorst D, Mena R. When Covid-19 meets conflict: politics of the pandemic response in fragile and conflict-affected states. DISASTERS 2021; 45 Suppl 1:S174-S194. [PMID: 34553401 PMCID: PMC8653116 DOI: 10.1111/disa.12514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has magnified existing crises and vulnerabilities, but much remains unknown about how it has affected fragile and conflict-affected settings. This paper builds on the theory that hazards become a disaster in interaction with vulnerability and response policies, yet often lead to renewed disaster risk creation. It is based on seven case studies of countries worldwide that experienced social conflict at the advent of the pandemic, covering the period from March-August 2020. The findings show that authorities instrumentalised Covid-19 to strengthen their control and agendas. Responsibility was assumed for lockdowns, but this was not accompanied by care to mitigate their adverse effects. Social conflict shaped the response, as high levels of mistrust in authorities complicated the implementation of measures, while authorities did not support community-based coping initiatives. Whether Covid-19 will trigger or exacerbate conflict and vulnerabilities depends on pre-existing, country-specific conditions, and how a government and other actors frame the issue and respond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothea Hilhorst
- Professor, International Institute of Social StudiesErasmus University RotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo Mena
- Assistant Professor, International Institute of Social StudiesErasmus University RotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kett M, Cole E, Beato L, Carew M, Ngafuan R, Konneh S, Colbourn T. The Ebola crisis and people with disabilities' access to healthcare and government services in Liberia. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20:247. [PMID: 34819095 PMCID: PMC8611399 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01580-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been little research on the impact of the 2014-2015 West African Ebola crisis on people with disabilities. This paper outlines the way in which the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in Liberia in 2015 highlighted existing inequalities and exclusion of people with disabilities and their households. METHODS The results presented here are part of a larger ESRC/DFID-funded mixed methods research project in Liberia (2014-2017) which included a quantitative household survey undertaken in five counties, complemented by qualitative focus group discussions and interviews with people with disabilities and other key stakeholders. Uniquely, this research gathered information about people with disabilities' experience of the EVD outbreak, as well as additional socioeconomic and inclusion data, that compared their experience with non-disabled community members. RESULTS Reflections by people with disabilities themselves show knowledge, preparation, and responses to the EVD epidemic was often markedly different among people with disabilities due to limited resources, lack of inclusion by many mainstream public health and medical interventions and pre-existing discrimination, marginalisation and exclusion. Interviews with other key stakeholder revealed a lack of awareness of disability issues or sufficient training to include this population systematically in both Ebola response activities and general health services. Key findings include the need to understand and mitigate direct and indirect health consequences of unequal responses to the epidemic, as well as the limited capacity of healthcare and social services to respond to people with disabilities. CONCLUSION There are lessons to be learned from Ebola outbreak around inclusion of people with disabilities, relevant to the current COVID-19 pandemic. Now is the time to undertake measures to ensure that people with disabilities do not continue to be marginalised and excluded during global public health emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kett
- UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, London, UK.
| | - Ellie Cole
- UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, London, UK
| | - Lucila Beato
- University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mayhew SH, Balabanova D, Vandi A, Mokuwa GA, Hanson T, Parker M, Richards P. (Re)arranging "systems of care" in the early Ebola response in Sierra Leone: An interdisciplinary analysis. Soc Sci Med 2021; 300:114209. [PMID: 34247897 PMCID: PMC9077326 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Despite an expanding literature on Ebola-response, few studies detail or reflect on the responses of diverse systems of care. Little is known about how, why or in what ways, strategies of ill-health management were enacted locally, how health-systems power, authority and hierarchy were perceived and contested, or how other social systems, institutions and relationships shaped the response. This paper presents an interdisciplinary analysis of local responses in two early affected districts in Sierra Leone. Drawing on anthropological theories of social ordering and assemblage, we present an analysis of contrasting infection chains in three extended case studies from Bo and Moyamba districts. In contrast to previous scholarship which has understood local actions as being reactive (supporting or obstructing) to a national Ebola response, we show that local arrangements lead and shape responses. Our cases show how multiple, entangled, dynamic and co-existing systems of care influence these responses. Some individuals and communities collaborated with health authorities on measures like reporting and quarantine, others actively opposed them, or played an intermediary role. Collectively, formal health systems actors, local authorities and ordinary citizens negotiated and enacted new arrangements. These arrangements involved compromise and sometimes power was reconfigured. They were also shaped by wider political and historical contexts and by availability or absence of formal healthcare resources. Our research shows the critical importance of understanding how institutions and people involved in healthcare enact diverse “systems of care” and thereby shape Ebola response. Most importantly, our work underlines the need for alignment between formal health-systems and wider social, cultural, political and economic forms of organisation at family and community levels to improve crisis-response and promote sustainable care. In particular, health systems responders need to identify and engage with key brokers – or arrangers – in frontline care systems, with whom mutually acceptable, and effective, reconfigurations of care can be achieved. Multiple, dynamic, co-existing systems of care shaped Sierra Leone's Ebola response. Political/historic context, resources, conflict and compromise all shaped care systems. Diverse local actors negotiated relationships to reconfigure healthcare arrangements. It is local arrangements that lead and shape crisis-response at the decentralised level. Health systems need to engage with “arrangers” to reconfigure locally responsive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susannah H Mayhew
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Dina Balabanova
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ahmed Vandi
- School of Community Health Sciences, Njala University, Kowama, Bo, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Tommy Hanson
- School of Community Health Sciences, Njala University, Kowama, Bo, Sierra Leone
| | - Melissa Parker
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Paul Richards
- School of Environmental Sciences, Njala University, Mokonde, Sierra Leone
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
A review and agenda for integrated disease models including social and behavioural factors. Nat Hum Behav 2021; 5:834-846. [PMID: 34183799 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01136-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Social and behavioural factors are critical to the emergence, spread and containment of human disease, and are key determinants of the course, duration and outcomes of disease outbreaks. Recent epidemics of Ebola in West Africa and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) globally have reinforced the importance of developing infectious disease models that better integrate social and behavioural dynamics and theories. Meanwhile, the growth in capacity, coordination and prioritization of social science research and of risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) practice within the current pandemic response provides an opportunity for collaboration among epidemiological modellers, social scientists and RCCE practitioners towards a mutually beneficial research and practice agenda. Here, we provide a review of the current modelling methodologies and describe the challenges and opportunities for integrating them with social science research and RCCE practice. Finally, we set out an agenda for advancing transdisciplinary collaboration for integrated disease modelling and for more robust policy and practice for reducing disease transmission.
Collapse
|
19
|
Mayhew SH, Kyamusugulwa PM, Kihangi Bindu K, Richards P, Kiyungu C, Balabanova D. Responding to the 2018-2020 Ebola Virus Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Rethinking Humanitarian Approaches. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2021; 14:1731-1747. [PMID: 33953623 PMCID: PMC8092619 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s219295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) presents a challenging context in which to respond to public health crises. Its 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak was the second largest in history. Lessons were known from the previous West African outbreak. Chief among these was the recognition that local action and involvement are key to establishing effective epidemic-response. It remains unclear whether and how this was achieved in DRC's Ebola response. Additionally, there is a lack of scholarship on how to build resilience (the ability to adapt or transform under pressure) in crisis-response. In this article, we critically review literature to examine evidence on whether and how communities were involved, trust built, and resilience strengthened through adaptation or transformation of DRC's 2018-2020 Ebola response measures. Overall, we found limited evidence that the response adapted to engage and involve local actors and institutions or respond to locally expressed concerns. When adaptations occurred, they were shaped by national and international actors rather than enabling local actors to develop locally trusted initiatives. Communities were "engaged" to understand their perceptions but were not involved in decision-making or shaping responses. Few studies documented how trust was built or analyzed power dynamics between different groups in DRC. Yet, both these elements appear to be critical in building effective, resilient responses. These failures occurred because there was no willingness by the national government or international agencies to concede decision-making power to local people. Emergency humanitarian response is entrenched in highly medicalized, military style command and control approaches which have no space for decentralizing decision-making to "non-experts". To transform humanitarian responses, international responders can no longer be regarded as "experts" who own the knowledge and control the response. To successfully tackle future humanitarian crises requires a transformation of international humanitarian and emergency response systems such that they are led, or shaped, through inclusive, equitable collaboration with local actors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susannah H Mayhew
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Patrick Milabyo Kyamusugulwa
- Bukavu Medical University College/Institut Supérieur des Techniques Médicales de Bukavu (ISTM-Bukavu), Bukavu, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Kennedy Kihangi Bindu
- Centre de Recherche sur la Démocratie et le Développement en Afrique (CREDDA), Université Libre des Pays des Grands Lacs, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Paul Richards
- School of Environmental Sciences, Njala University, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Cyrille Kiyungu
- Hygiene, State Administration, Kikwit, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Dina Balabanova
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
MacGregor H, Leach M, Tshangela A, Hrynick TA, Lees S, Niederberger E, Parker M, Ripoll Lorenzo S, Rohan H, Schmidt-Sane M, Tulloch O, Wilkinson A. One size does not fit all: adapt and localise for effective, proportionate and equitable responses to COVID-19 in Africa. Fam Med Community Health 2021; 9:e000709. [PMID: 33811088 PMCID: PMC8023752 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Akhona Tshangela
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, African Union, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Shelley Lees
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Melissa Parker
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Hana Rohan
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tsang PM, Prost A. Boundaries of solidarity: a meta-ethnography of mask use during past epidemics to inform SARS-CoV-2 suppression. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e004068. [PMID: 33408191 PMCID: PMC7789204 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many countries aiming to suppress SARS-CoV-2 recommend the use of face masks by the general public. The social meanings attached to masks may influence their use, but remain underinvestigated. METHODS We systematically searched eight databases for studies containing qualitative data on public mask use during past epidemics, and used meta-ethnography to explore their social meanings. We compared key concepts within and across studies, then jointly wrote a critical synthesis. RESULTS We found nine studies from China (n=5), Japan (n=1), Mexico (n=1), South Africa (n=1) and the USA (n=1). All studies describing routine mask use during epidemics were from East Asia. Participants identified masks as symbols of solidarity, civic responsibility and an allegiance to science. This effect was amplified by heightened risk perception (eg, during SARS in 2003), and by seeing masks on political leaders and in outdoor public spaces. Masks also acted as containment devices to manage threats to identity at personal and collective levels. In China and Japan, public and corporate campaigns framed routine mask use as individual responsibility for disease prevention in return for state- or corporate-sponsored healthcare access. In most studies, mask use waned as risk perception fell. In contexts where masks were mostly worn by patients with specific diseases (eg, for patients with tuberculosis in South Africa), or when trust in government was low (eg, during H1N1 in Mexico), participants described masks as stigmatising, uncomfortable or oppressive. CONCLUSION Face masks can take on positive social meanings linked to solidarity and altruism during epidemics. Unfortunately, these positive meanings can fail to take hold when risk perception falls, rules are seen as complex or unfair, and trust in government is low. At such times, ensuring continued use is likely to require additional efforts to promote locally appropriate positive social meanings, simplifying rules for use and ensuring fair enforcement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po Man Tsang
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Audrey Prost
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Colbourn T, Waites W, Manheim D, Foster D, Sturniolo S, Sculpher M, Kerr CC, Colbourn G, Bowie C, Godfrey KM, Peto J, Burgess RA, McCoy D, Alwan NA, Yao G, Ouyang K, Roderick PJ, Pizzo E, Hill T, McGrath N, Orcutt M, Evans O, Cheetham NJ, Bonell C, Gomes M, Panovska-Griffiths J, Raine R. Modelling the health and economic impacts of different testing and tracing strategies for COVID-19 in the UK. F1000Res 2020. [DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.27980.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is resurgent in the UK and health and economic costs of the epidemic continue to rise. There is a need to understand the health and economic costs of different courses of action. Methods: We combine modelling, economic analysis and a user-friendly interface to contrast the impact and costs of different testing strategies: two levels of testing within the current test-trace-isolate (TTI) strategy (testing symptomatic people, tracing and isolating everyone) and a strategy where TTI is combined with universal testing (UT; i.e. additional population testing to identify asymptomatic cases). We also model effective coverage of face masks. Results: Increased testing is necessary to suppress the virus after lockdown. Partial reopening accompanied by scaled-up TTI (at 50% test and trace levels), full isolation and moderately effective coverage of masks (30% reduction in overall transmission) can reduce the current resurgence of the virus and protect the economy in the UK. Additional UT from December 2020 reduces the epidemic dramatically by Jan 2021 when combined with enhanced TTI (70% test-trace levels) and full isolation. UT could then be stopped; continued TTI would prevent rapid recurrence. This TTI+UT combination can suppress the virus further to save ~20,000 more lives and avoid ~£90bn economic losses, though costs ~£8bn more to deliver. We assume that all traced and lab-confirmed cases are isolated. The flexible interface we have developed allows exploration of additional scenarios, including different levels of reopening of society after the second lockdown in England as well as different levels of effective mask coverage. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that increased TTI is necessary to suppress the virus and protect the economy after the second lockdown in England. Additional UT from December 2020 reduces the epidemic dramatically by Jan 2021 and could then be stopped, as continued TTI would prevent rapid recurrence.
Collapse
|
23
|
Barker KM, Ling EJ, Fallah M, VanDeBogert B, Kodl Y, Macauley RJ, Viswanath K, Kruk ME. Community engagement for health system resilience: evidence from Liberia's Ebola epidemic. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:416-423. [PMID: 32040166 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The importance of community engagement (CE) for health system resilience is established in theoretical and empirical literature. The practical dimensions of how to operationalize theory and implement its principles have been less explored, especially within low-resource crisis settings. It is therefore unclear how CE is drawn upon and how, if at all, it facilitates health system resilience in times of health system crises. To address this critical gap, we adapt and apply existing theoretical CE frameworks to analyse qualitative data from 92 in-depth interviews and 16 focus group discussions collected with health system stakeholders in Liberia in the aftermath of the 2014-15 Ebola outbreak. Health system stakeholders indicated that CE was a crucial contributing factor in addressing the Ebola epidemic in Liberia. Multiple forms of CE were used during the outbreak; however, only some forms were perceived as meaningful, such as the formation of community-based surveillance teams. To achieve meaningful CE, participants recommended that communities be treated as active participants in-as opposed to passive recipients of-health response efforts and that communication platforms for CE be established ahead of a crisis. Participant responses highlight that meaningful CE led to improved communication with and increased trust in health authorities and programming. This facilitated health system response efforts, leading to a fortuitous cycle of increased trust, improved communication and continued meaningful CE-all necessary conditions for health system resilience. This study refines our understanding of CE and demonstrates the ways in which meaningful CE and trust work together in mutually reinforcing and beneficial ways. These findings provide empirical evidence on which to base policies and programmes aimed at improving health system resilience in low-resource settings to more effectively respond to health system crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M Barker
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, # 0507, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Emilia J Ling
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Medical School Office Building, Rm 328, 1265 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Mosoka Fallah
- Community-Based Initiative, United Nations Development Programme and Ministry of Health.,A.M. Dogliotti College of Medicine, University of Liberia, P.O Box 10-9020, Capitol Hill, 1000 Monrovia 10, Liberia
| | - Brian VanDeBogert
- Catholic Relief Services, 228 W. Lexington St., Baltimore, MD 21201-3443, USA
| | - Yvonne Kodl
- International Rescue Committee, 1730 M St NW, Suite 505, Washington, DC 20009, USA
| | | | - K Viswanath
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Margaret E Kruk
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Richards P, Mokuwa GA, Vandi A, Mayhew SH. Re-analysing Ebola spread in Sierra Leone: The importance of local social dynamics. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234823. [PMID: 33151945 PMCID: PMC7644078 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2013-15 Ebola epidemic in West Africa was the largest so far recorded, and mainly affected three adjacent countries, Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. The worst affected country (in terms of confirmed cases) was Sierra Leone. The present paper looks at the epidemic in Sierra Leone. The epidemic in this country was a concatenation of local outbreaks. These local outbreaks are not well characterized through analysis using standard numerical techniques. In part, this reflects difficulties in record collection at the height of the epidemic. This paper offers a different approach, based on application of field-based techniques of social investigation that provide a richer understanding of the epidemic. METHODS In a post-epidemic study (2016-18) of two districts (Bo and Moyamba) we use ethnographic data to reconstruct local infection pathways from evidence provided by affected communities, cross-referenced to records of the epidemic retained by the National Ebola Response Commission, now lodged in the Ebola Museum and Archive at Njala University. Our study documents and discusses local social and contextual factors largely missing from previously published studies. RESULTS Our major finding is that the epidemic in Sierra Leone was a series of local outbreaks, some of which were better contained than others. In those that were not well contained, a number of contingent factors helps explain loss of control. Several numerical studies have drawn attention to the importance of local heterogeneities in the Sierra Leone Ebola epidemic. Our qualitative study throws specific light on a number of elements that explain these heterogeneities: the role of externalities, health system deficiencies, cultural considerations and local coping capacities. CONCLUSIONS Social issues and local contingencies explain the spread of Ebola in Sierra Leone and are key to understanding heterogeneities in epidemiological data. Integrating ethnographic research into epidemic-response is critical to properly understand the patterns of spread and the opportunities to intervene. This conclusion has significant implications for future interdisciplinary research and interpretation of standard numerical data, and consequently for control of epidemic outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Richards
- School of Environmental Sciences, Njala University, Mokonde, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Ahmed Vandi
- School of Community Health Sciences, Kowama, Bo, Sierra Leone
| | - Susannah Harding Mayhew
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Parker
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hayley MacGregor
- Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Grace Akello
- The Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bonell C, Michie S, Reicher S, West R, Bear L, Yardley L, Curtis V, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ. Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain 'social distancing' in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles. J Epidemiol Community Health 2020; 74:617-619. [PMID: 32385125 PMCID: PMC7368244 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2020-214290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Bonell
- Department of Public Health, Environment and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Laura Bear
- London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Val Curtis
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - G James Rubin
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rhodes T, Lancaster K, Lees S, Parker M. Modelling the pandemic: attuning models to their contexts. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e002914. [PMID: 32565430 PMCID: PMC7307539 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The evidence produced in mathematical models plays a key role in shaping policy decisions in pandemics. A key question is therefore how well pandemic models relate to their implementation contexts. Drawing on the cases of Ebola and influenza, we map how sociological and anthropological research contributes in the modelling of pandemics to consider lessons for COVID-19. We show how models detach from their implementation contexts through their connections with global narratives of pandemic response, and how sociological and anthropological research can help to locate models differently. This potentiates multiple models of pandemic response attuned to their emerging situations in an iterative and adaptive science. We propose a more open approach to the modelling of pandemics which envisages the model as an intervention of deliberation in situations of evolving uncertainty. This challenges the 'business-as-usual' of evidence-based approaches in global health by accentuating all science, within and beyond pandemics, as 'emergent' and 'adaptive'.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- COVID-19
- Communicable Disease Control
- Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology
- Coronavirus Infections/immunology
- Health Policy
- Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology
- Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/immunology
- Humans
- Immunity, Herd
- Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/physiology
- Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/physiology
- Influenza, Human/epidemiology
- Influenza, Human/immunology
- Models, Biological
- Pandemics
- Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology
- Pneumonia, Viral/immunology
- Uncertainty
- Virus Diseases/epidemiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Rhodes
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kari Lancaster
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shelley Lees
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Melissa Parker
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
In rural Southern Chile, native Mapuche families receive care mostly from non-indigenous clinicians. Parents and doctors alike orient to the importance of timely medical care, but clinical and communication norms also result in misunderstandings and tension. Parents find it hard to communicate about structural obstacles, and valued practices of care in families may conflict with normative expectations for timely presentation. Parents' disclosures about the duration of their children's illnesses can expose them to clinical censure, which in turn reinforces pernicious negative stereotypes about this racialized and marginalized community.
Collapse
|
29
|
Ebata A, Hodge C, Braam D, Waldman L, Sharp J, MacGregor H, Moore H. Power, participation and their problems: A consideration of power dynamics in the use of participatory epidemiology for one health and zoonoses research. Prev Vet Med 2020; 177:104940. [PMID: 32244084 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The use of Participatory Epidemiology in veterinary research intends to include livestock keepers and other local stakeholders in research processes and the development of solutions to animal health problems, including potentially zoonotic diseases. It can also be an attempt to bring some of the methods and insights of social science into a discipline largely shaped by natural science methods and ways of seeing the world. The introduction of participatory methodologies to veterinary epidemiology and disease surveillance follows a wider movement in development thinking, questioning the top-down nature of much post-second world war development efforts directed from the Global North towards the Global South. In the best cases, participatory methods can help to empower the poor and marginalised to participate in and have some control over research and interventions which affect them. Compiled from experience in multi-disciplinary One Health projects, this paper briefly traces the rise of participatory epidemiology before examining some of the limitations observed in its implementation and steps that might be taken to alleviate the problems observed. The three areas in which the operationalisation of Participatory Epidemiology in veterinary and One Health research could be improved are identified as: broadening the focus of engagement with communities beyond quantitative data extraction; taking note of the wider power structures in which research takes place, and questioning who speaks for a community when participatory methods are used. In particular, the focus falls on how researchers from different disciplines, including veterinary medicine and the social sciences, can work together to ensure that participatory epidemiology is employed in such a way that it improves the quality of life of both people and animals around the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayako Ebata
- Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London, Floor 7, Maple House 149, Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Hodge
- Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London, Floor 7, Maple House 149, Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Dorien Braam
- Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London, Floor 7, Maple House 149, Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Waldman
- Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London, Floor 7, Maple House 149, Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joanne Sharp
- Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London, Floor 7, Maple House 149, Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley MacGregor
- Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London, Floor 7, Maple House 149, Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, United Kingdom
| | - Henrietta Moore
- Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London, Floor 7, Maple House 149, Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Parker M, Hanson TM, Vandi A, Babawo LS, Allen T. Ebola, community engagement, and saving loved ones. Lancet 2019; 393:2585. [PMID: 31196572 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31364-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Parker
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | | | - Ahmed Vandi
- Department of Community Health and Clinical Studies, Njala University, Bo, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Tim Allen
- Centre for Public Authority and International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|