Evaluation of outcome and QOL in patients with craniofacial resection for malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base

Psychometric testing of the Skull Base Inventory health-related quality of life questionnaire in a multi-institutional study of patients undergoing open and endoscopic surgery

PURPOSE

The skull base inventory (SBI) was developed to better assess health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in patients with anterior and central skull base neoplasms treated by endoscopic and open approaches. The primary objective of this study was to prospectively assess the psychometric properties of the SBI.

METHODS

This study is part of a multi-center study of patients undergoing endoscopic and open procedures completed between 2012 and 2018. Participants were eligible if they were over 18 years of age; had benign or malignant anterior, antero-lateral, or central skull base tumors; and required either an open or endoscopic skull base surgical approach. In order to assess the psychometric properties of the SBI, patients completed the instrument at six time points (preoperative, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months postoperative). Patients also completed the Anterior Skull Base (ASB) questionnaire and the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) to allow comparison to the SBI.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-seven patients were included across five centers, with 121 having an endoscopic procedure. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and test-retest at 12 months and 12 months plus 2 weeks (intraclass correlation > 0.90) were excellent. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by very strong correlation between total SBI scores and ASB scores (r = 0.810 to 0.869, p < 0.001) and moderate correlation between nasal domain SBI scores and SNOT-22 scores (r = - 0.616 to - 0.738, p < 0.001). Convergent validity was demonstrated by moderate correlation between change in SBI scores and global QOL change (r_s = 0.4942, p < 0.001). The minimally important clinical difference (global HR-QOL change of "a little better" or "a little worse") was 6.0.

CONCLUSION

The SBI questionnaire is reliable and valid for patients treated by both endoscopic and open approaches and can be used for assessment of HR-QOL in these settings.

Visual Outcomes After Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Orbital Lesions

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been increasing in popularity as an alternative to traditional transcranial and transorbital approaches in the treatment of orbital pathological entities. The purpose of the present study was to examine the outcomes of patients who had undergone EEA resection of orbital lesions at our center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective medical record review of patients who had undergone the EEA for resection of orbital lesions and orbital apex decompression from January 1, 2006 to December 1, 2019. For all the patients, the demographic data, presenting symptoms, symptom duration, imaging data, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent endoscopic endonasal resection of orbital lesions and orbital apex decompression at our center, including 6 male patients and 3 female patients. The mean age was 49.4 years, and the mean follow-up period was 3.8 years (range, 1-13.5 years). The orbital pathological lesions that were treated included nasopharyngeal carcinoma, hemangioma, fibrous dysplasia, IgG4 pseudotumor, inverted papilloma, angioleiomyoma, adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine paraganglioma metastasis. All the patients presented with exophthalmos of the affected orbit. Of the 9 patients, 5 presented with decreased visual acuity on examination. Postoperatively, 1 of these 5 patients had improved to baseline visual acuity, 3 had stable vision, and 1 had brief improvement before experiencing progressive visual decline 1 month postoperatively. Two patients presented with diplopia, and both improved postoperatively. Three patients experienced new, transient, and self-limiting postoperative diplopia.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with orbital lesions causing compressive optic neuropathy, the endoscopic endonasal approach can be used as an alternative strategy in appropriately selected patients.

Evolution of sinonasal symptoms and mucosal healing after minimally invasive pituitary surgery

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pituitary surgery (MIPS) via endoscopy has become widely accepted as the surgical paradigm of choice for pituitary pathology. The objective of the current study was to analyze the evolution of symptom scores and mucosal healing after MIPS.

METHODS

The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores and objective endoscopic data of 52 patients were reviewed in a longitudinal manner. Scaled averages of the SNOT-22 and endoscopic scores from different time points were compared with baseline scores by using nonparametric testing. The time to baseline for endoscopic examinations was also analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

The rhinologic symptoms subdomain of the SNOT-22 scores showed statistically significant worsening between baseline and 2 weeks after surgery (p = 0.03). Follow-up SNOT-22 scores after 2 weeks showed no significant differences compared with baseline scores, with an overall trend toward improvement in patient symptoms during the subsequent period. Similar analysis for the endoscopic data illustrated statistically significant differences from the baseline scores up to 16 weeks after surgery. The overall trend showed a worsened endoscopic examination, initially with a spike at ∼8 to 10 weeks (p = 0.03) and with a subsequent return to baseline. The Kaplan-Meier estimate curve demonstrated a median time to return to baseline endoscopy at 18.9 weeks (95% confidence interval, 14.9-38.3 weeks).

CONCLUSION

The longitudinal data exhibited subjective improvement of patient outcomes based on SNOT-22 scores within 2-4 weeks after MIPS. However, the objective endoscopic data revealed a lag in improvement of the examination, typically at 16-20 weeks, which underscores ongoing careful endoscopic assessment and management to ensure proper mucosal healing beyond just subjective symptoms as the gauge to postoperative recovery.

Preferences and Utilities for Health States after Treatment of Olfactory Groove Meningioma: Endoscopic versus Open

Objectives  The purpose of this study is to report health utility scores for patients with olfactory groove meningiomas (OGM) treated with either the standard transcranial approach, or the expanded endonasal endoscopic approach. Design  The time trade-off technique was used to derive health utility scores. Setting  Healthy individuals without skull base tumors were surveyed. Main Outcome Measures  Participants reviewed and rated scenarios describing treatment (endoscopic, open, stereotactic radiation, watchful waiting), remission, recurrence, and complications associated with the management of OGMs. Results  There were 51 participants. The endoscopic approach was associated with higher utility scores compared with an open craniotomy approach (0.88 vs. 0.74; p  < 0.001) and watchful waiting (0.88 vs.0.74; p  = 0.002). If recurrence occurred, revision endoscopic resection continued to have a higher utility score compared with revision open craniotomy (0.68; p  = 0.008). On multivariate analysis, older individuals were more likely to opt for watchful waiting ( p  = 0.001), whereas participants from higher income brackets were more likely to rate stereotactic radiosurgery with higher utility scores ( p  = 0.017). Conclusion  The endoscopic approach was associated with higher utility scores than craniotomy for primary and revision cases. The present utilities can be used for future cost-utility analyses.

Advantage of Extended Craniofacial Resection for Advanced Malignant Tumors of the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses: Long-Term Outcome and Surgical Management

OBJECTIVE

Craniofacial resection (CFR) for advanced sinonasal malignant tumors (SNMTs) is mandatory for radical resection. Surgeons must be aware of perioperative complications and long-term outcome because this procedure is extremely invasive, especially when the tumor involves the anterior skull base.

METHODS

Thirty-eight consecutive surgical patients with advanced SNMT of T4 stage or Kadish stage C (31 men and 7 women; mean age, 55 years; range: 19-76 years) treated with CFR in the past 28 years were followed up for 59.4 months. In cases of unilateral orbital extension, en-bloc resection was achieved using several neurosurgical techniques (extended CFR) from 2005 onwards. Herein, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of surgery by comparing survival data between 2 time periods (first stage: 1984-2004, second stage: 2005-2012).

RESULTS

Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological type observed (65.8%), followed by esthesioneuroblastoma (15.8%). Using a combination of adjuvant radiation therapy, the 5-year overall survival and the 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 55.5% and 59.4%, respectively. Sarcomatous histology was a poor prognostic factor. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 48.9% in the first stage and improved to 82.1% in the second stage (P = 0.057); this was related to improvements in local control rate.

CONCLUSIONS

CFR and postoperative radiotherapy are safe and effective for treating advanced SNMTs. Extended CFR, including radical orbital exenteration, may contribute to good long-term outcomes. A diverse surgical team may help perform radical resection and reconstruction in patients with advanced tumors.

Changes Experienced in Quality of Life for Skull Base Surgical Patients: A Qualitative Case Study

Objective Skull base tumors are associated with quality of life (QOL) changes. A qualitative case-study approach may help better understand patients' experiences. Methods A total of 34 skull base surgery patients were selected into focus groups using a criterion-based maximum variation sampling strategy from a sampling frame of 138 patients. Eight groups were organized based on a factorial design of surgical approach (endoscopic/pen) and tumor location (anterior/central). Data were analyzed using a conceptual framework. Qualitative analysis was performed on focus group transcripts to identify major themes and determine if surgical approach or tumor location had differential effects on QOL. Concepts were quantitatively tallied from written workbooks. Results The 34 participants (19 men, 15 women; mean age: 48 years, standard deviation: 14 years) had mixed reactions to their diagnosis ranging from relief to fear. Participants reported physical and nonphysical changes in QOL with some variation in physical complaints by tumor location. Several major themes emerged from the analysis. Skull base tumors are associated with fear and frustration, loss of physical senses and self-identity, social isolation, and coping mechanisms. Conclusions Skull base surgery may impact patients' lives. Qualitative study of patient experiences can provide rich information to better understand this disease.

Advantages and limitations of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base

BACKGROUND

The anatomy of the skull base is extremely complex with an abundance of critical neurovascular bundles and their corresponding foramina as well as the insertions and origins of multiple masticatory and craniocervical muscles. These anatomic intricacies increase the difficulty of surgery within this area.

METHODS

Advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) based on the authors' sequential learning and experience are described.

RESULTS

EEAs offer the advantages of using preexistent air spaces that enable accessing various areas of the skull base, while avoiding external incisions or scars and obviating the need for the translocation of the maxillofacial skeleton. In addition, EEAs are well suited to preserve neurologic, visual, and masticatory functions as well as cosmesis. However, the sinonasal corridor must be expanded and optimized to access the skull base adequately, facilitate the reconstruction of the surgical defect, avoid sinonasal complications, and minimize sequelae. Important considerations can limit or indicate the approach, such as the nature of the pathology, including location, diagnosis, and vascularity; patient characteristics, including age and medical comorbidities; surgeon attributes, including training, experience, and expertise; the resultant need to reconstruct large skull base defects and feasible alternatives to do so; and institutional resources, including adjunctive services, an intensive care unit, and operating room equipment.

CONCLUSIONS

EEAs are important techniques in contemporary skull base surgery. Understanding the indications for and limitations of these approaches help to maximize outcomes.

Unfavourable results in skull base surgery

Treatment of skull base tumors involves multiple specialities. The lesions are usually advanced and the treatment is often associated with unfavorable results, which may be functional and/or aesthetic. Here we have done an analysis for the complications and unfavorable results of 546 cases treated surgically by a single craniofacial surgeon over a period of 14 years. The major morbidity ranges from death to permanent impairment of vital organ functions (brain, eye, nose), infections, tissue losses, flap failures, treatment associated complications, psychosocial issues, and aesthesis besides others. This article is aimed at bringing forth these unfavorable results and how to avoid them.

Sinonasal quality of life outcomes after minimally invasive resection of sinonasal and skull-base tumors

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive endoscopic resection (MIER) has emerged as the standard for surgical management of benign and malignant sinonasal and skull-base neoplasms. The objective of the present study was to assess sinonasal quality of life (QOL) and to analyze factors that impact symptomatology after surgery.

METHODS

This single-institution observational cohort study was performed on 94 patients over a 3-year period.

RESULTS

The mean age was 55.2 years, with male:female ratio of 1.5:1. Benign and malignant tumors were observed in 48% and 52% of patients, respectively. The cohort's mean preoperative 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test score (SNOT-20) was 1.27, decreasing to 0.91 (p = 0.002) at 6 months postoperatively. Patients with benign neoplasms had a lower mean preoperative SNOT-20 score of 1.11 that decreased to 0.58 (p = 0.002), whereas patients with malignant tumors had a higher mean preoperative SNOT-20 score of 1.27, decreasing to 1.03 (p = 0.134) at 6 months postoperatively. The SNOT-20 scores for females improved 0.53 (p = 0.002) compared to 0.23 (p = 0.154) for males at 6 months. Statistically significant sinonasal QOL improvement was noted in nonsmokers (0.62, p = 0.0006), patients with no prior radiation or chemotherapy (0.59, p = 0.0029), and patients with no prior surgery (0.51, p = 0.0012). Multiple variable regression analysis demonstrated that the 2 strongest predictors for lack of SNOT-20 improvement were previous history of smoking (p < 0.05) and prior radiation and/or chemotherapy (p < 0.01) (R(2) = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

MIER results in overall improvement in SNOT-20 scores, with greater change being noted in females and in patients with benign tumors. Prior smoking and chemoradiation strongly predict decreased improvement in sinonasal QOL after surgery.

Craniofacial Resection for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors: Statistical Analysis of Surgical Outcome over 17 Years at a Single Institution

We present a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of sinonasal malignant tumors. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local control (LC), and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated in 32 patients. Prognostic factors for survival and functional outcomes were investigated. The median follow-up period was 70 months. At 5 years, OS, DSS, LC, and DFS rates were 0.722, 0.745, 0.851, and 0.707, respectively. Prognostic factors for poor OS were involvement of the frontal sinus (p = 0.023), T classification (T4, p = 0.025), surgical complications (p = 0.029), chemotherapy (p = 0.035) postsurgical infection (p = 0.043), involvement of the orbit (p = 0.048), histology (squamous cell carcinoma, p = 0.049), and radiotherapy (p = 0.043). Prognostic factors for poor DSS were radiotherapy (p = 0.030), chemotherapy (p = 0.036), positive surgical margin (p = 0.034), and T classification (T4, p = 0.050). LC was adversely influenced by surgical procedure (combined frontotemporal resection, p = 0.035) and positive surgical margin (p = 0.049). DFS was adversely influenced by positive surgical margin (p = 0.001). Prognostic factors for poor functional outcome were postsurgical infection (p = 0.039), postsurgical complications (p = 0.040), tumor location (maxillary sinus, p = 0.042, orbit, p = 0.0002), number of sinuses involved (number of sinuses involved was inversely proportional to functional outcome, p = 0.027), T classification (T4 p = 0.007), pathology (squamous cell carcinoma, p = 0.023), and chemotherapy (p = 0.048). Craniofacial resection was an effective surgical option.

Global and disease-specific health-related quality of life after complete endoscopic resection of anterior skull base neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery for neoplasms of the anterior skull base has revolutionized the treatment of these diseases. The relative effect of endoscopic procedures, however, has not been described in terms of disease-specific and global health-related quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A single-center longitudinal study was performed of patients undergoing complete endoscopic resection of anterior skull base neoplasms. Patients presenting between October 2009 and September 2010 were enrolled. QoL assessments were based on the 22-question Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22), Health Utilities Index Mark II (HUI-2), and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) and were completed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Comparisons over time were made within subjects.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled; 11 completed preoperative and postoperative assessments (79%). Our cohort consisted of five men and six women; mean age was 55 years. Six patients had malignant tumors; four required adjuvant therapy. SNOT-22 scores were stable or improved in 10 cases (91%), with a significant difference for the cohort (mean, -33 points; p < 0.01). Ten (91%) patients had stable or improved HUI-2 scores (mean utility change, +0.13). SF-12 scores were stable for both mental (p = 0.17) and physical (p = 0.26) components. Mean quality-adjusted life year gain over the study period was 0.07.

CONCLUSION

Complete endoscopic resection of anterior skull base neoplasms is oncologically sound with anecdotal QoL improvements relative to open craniofacial resection. We show positive, quantifiable QoL results with validated global and disease-specific instruments. Additional work will help to improve outcomes in this population and will be used in formal cost-effectiveness analysis.

Development of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for anterior and central skull base pathology--the skull base inventory

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Anterior and central skull base lesions and their surgical treatment (endoscopic or open approaches) can affect quality of life. A disease-specific instrument is needed to compare quality of life for different surgical approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

Items were generated using a composite strategy consisting of chart review, systematic review of skull base instruments, expert interviews, and qualitative analysis of patient focus groups. A cross-sectional survey study was performed to reduce items based on an item impact score.

METHODS

Charts of 138 patients who underwent skull base surgery were reviewed to identify physical items and domains. Five experts were interviewed for item and domain identification. Thirty-four patients were recruited into eight focus groups based on their surgical approach (open or endoscopic) and tumor location (anterior or central). Items were generated using a composite approach and then reduced into a final questionnaire using item impact scores.

RESULTS

Chart review identified 47 physical items. Systematic review revealed nine relevant instruments with 217 relevant items. Experts identified 11 domains with 69 additional items. Qualitative analysis of focus groups generated 49 items. A total of 382 items were identified and reduced to 77 items after eliminating overlapping and irrelevant items. Further item reduction using item impact scores yielded 41 items.

CONCLUSIONS

The Skull Base Inventory is a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument. Psychometric properties have yet to be tested. It may serve to compare quality of life for endoscopic or open procedures.

Endoscopic endonasal approach for the treatment of anterior skull base tumours

INTRODUCTION

The increasing expertise of transnasal endoscopic surgery has recently expanded its indications to include the management of tumours affecting the skull base. We report our experience with endoscopic management of these tumours, emphasising the indications and surgical technique used.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients treated by an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in our department from 2004 until 2011.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were analysed. We performed an endoscopic craniofacial resection in 32 patients (51%), an expanded EEA in 22 (35%), a transclival approach in 6 (9%) and a transpterygoid approach in 3 (5%). The most frequent benign tumour was nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (24%), while adenocarcinoma (30%) was the most common among malignancies. Mean follow-up was 26 months (range: 6 to 84 months). The complication rate was 5% and resection was complete in 56 cases (89%). The 5-year overall-survival was 71% in patients with malignant tumours and the effectiveness was 100% in benign tumours.

CONCLUSION

Our results support that endoscopic surgery, when properly planned, represents a valid alternative to standard surgical approaches for the management of skull base tumours.

Minimally invasive endoscopic resection of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to review a single-institution experience with endoscopic resection of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients underwent treatment of SNUC between January 2002 and July 2009. Retrospective data were collected including demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical strategy, adjuvant therapies, local and regional recurrence, distant metastasis, overall survival, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The mean age was 51.8 years. The most common tumor stage at presentation was T4 (92%). Seven patients (53%) were treated with minimally invasive endoscopic resection (MIER) with negative intraoperative margins. Endoscopic anterior skull base resection was performed in 5 patients, and endoscopic-assisted bifrontal craniotomy was performed in 1 patient to clear the superior tumor margin. Six patients received pre- or postoperative chemoradiation. One patient underwent palliative chemoradiation, and one patient underwent open craniofacial resection. In the MIER group, simultaneous local and regional recurrence was observed in 1 patient (14%) after 30 months. Distant metastases were observed in 2 other patients (28%) without local or regional recurrence. All 3 patients with recurrences died of their disease. The remaining 4 patients were clinically, endoscopically, and radiographically free of disease, resulting in overall and disease-free survival rates of 57% with mean follow-up of 32.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data suggest a potential role for MIER in the comprehensive management algorithm of SNUC in appropriately selected patients. Patient outcomes including local and regional recurrence, distant metastases, and overall and disease-free survival were comparable to a treatment strategy using traditional craniofacial resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b.

A prospective evaluation of short-term health-related quality of life in patients undergoing anterior skull base surgery

We evaluated the health-related quality of life (QOL) of patients undergoing anterior skull base tumor resection. The Anterior Skull Base Surgery QOL questionnaire, a disease-specific multidimensional instrument dedicated to this population, was used to collect and prospectively analyze demographic, medical, and QOL data on 48 patients. Thirty-nine patients completed the questionnaire preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Seventeen patients (44%) had malignant histology and 22 (56%) had benign tumors. The overall QOL score decreased significantly at 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.05) and improved significantly at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.04). The emotional domain improved significantly at 12 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative scores (p < 0.03). Patients with malignant tumors had lower scores at 6 months postoperatively compared with patients with benign lesions (p < 0.002), although the scores for both groups at 12 months postoperatively were similar. Adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with a poor QOL (p < 0.005). The results of this prospective study show that the overall deteriorated QOL of patients after anterior skull base tumor resection returns to baseline by 1 year after surgery. Histology and radiotherapy are significant predictors of health-related QOL in this population.

Quality of Life following Surgery for Malignancies of the Anterior Skull Base

Radical surgery combined with postoperative radiation is recommended to achieve the best outcomes in patients suffering from malignant anterior skull base tumors. However, information on the impact of such treatment on the quality of life of these patients is sparse. This retrospective study evaluated quality of life in patients with anterior skull base malignancies after transdural resection and radiotherapy. At follow-up, 36% of the patients were alive (mean survival time, 39 months). Only 45% of the patients were able to work in their previous occupation a mean of 15 months after surgery. At follow-up, 58% of the patients had a recurrent tumor. The mean quality of life index was 42 points (range, 0 to 100). The lowest values were on the job item, and the highest mean value was on the family item. All patients, dependents, or both would agree to surgery in the future. Based on these findings, quality of life after transdural surgery for the treatment of anterior skull base malignancies seems to be low.

Quality of life in patients with skull base tumors: current status and future challenges

In selection of the right treatment for a specific patient, the surgeon should consider not only the best approach to remove a tumor but also the impact of treatment on the quality of life (QOL) of the patient. Procedures involving extirpation of skull base tumors may be associated with high morbidity. It is therefore important to study patients with skull base neoplasms, because survival differences between various treatment modalities may be small, yet larger differences are expected regarding morbidity. The overall QOL in the majority of patients after skull base tumor resection can be classified as "good," with significant improvement taking place within 12 months following surgery. Patients with carcinomas, acoustic schwannoma, or Cushing's disease suffer from more significant deterioration in their QOL after any intervention. Data retrieved from disease-specific questionnaires revealed that the financial and emotional domains have the worse impact on patients QOL. Old age, malignancy, comorbidity, radiotherapy, and extensive surgery were found to be also negative prognostic factors for QOL. Pain control regimens, antidepressants, and other psychological modalities, including group support, can improve QOL measures in these patients. It is critical that surgeons understand that they cannot assess their patients' perspectives on QOL correctly without asking them. For adequate assessment, validated disease-specific instruments addressing multiple domains of QOL should be utilized.

Outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic resection of anterior skull base neoplasms

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to review clinical outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic resection (MIER) for anterior skull base (ASB) neoplasms.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective data review.

METHODS

Data analysis was performed on all patients undergoing MIER from October 2000 to December 2008.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with mean age of 58 years underwent MIER. Malignant and benign tumors were managed in 25 (80.6%) and six (19.4%) cases, respectively. Most common histopathologies were squamous cell carcinoma (six), esthesioneuroblastoma (five), mucosal melanoma (five), and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (four). American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor staging was T3N0M0 and T4N0M0 in 14 (56%) and 11 (44%) of the malignant cases, respectively. Surgical resection with curative intent was performed in 28 cases (90.3%). Multilayered skull base reconstruction was performed in most patients; lumbar drains were used in eight cases (25.8%). Twenty-one patients (67.7%) were disease free, five patients (16.1%) were dead from disease, three patients (9.7%) were alive with disease, and two patients (6.5%) died from unrelated causes at mean follow-up of 31.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study validated technical feasibility of MIER for diversity of benign and malignant ASB histopathology. Majority of patients were able to avoid adjunct craniotomy, whereas lumbar drainage was utilized in selective cases. This surgical strategy resulted in low complication rate and acceptable disease-free survival in patients with advanced T3 and T4 malignant lesions. Future studies should focus on multicenter trials to facilitate more robust survival analysis and comparison to open surgical approaches.

Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery

The importance of quality of life (QOL) outcomes following treatments for head and neck tumors are now increasingly appreciated and measured to improve medical and surgical care for these patients. An understanding of the definitions in the setting of health care and the use of appropriate QOL instruments and measures are critical to obtain meaningful information that guides decision making in various aspects of patient health care. QOL outcomes following cranial base surgery is only recently being defined. In this article, we describe the current published data on QOL outcomes following cranial base surgery and provide preliminary prospective data on QOL outcomes and sinonasal morbidity in patients who underwent endonasal cranial base surgery for management of various skull base tumors at our institution. We used a disease-specific multidimensional instrument to measure QOL outcomes in these patients. Our results show that although sinonasal morbidity is increased, this is temporary, and the vast majority of patients have a very good QOL by 4 to 6 months after endonasal approach to the cranial base.

Maxillofacial rehabilitation after rhinectomy using two different treatment options: clinical reports

The aim of these clinical reports was to describe two different approaches to prosthetic rehabilitation after facial disfigurement because of a total rhinectomy. A man with a total rhinectomy was scheduled for craniofacial implants in the nasal residual defect. Three oral implants were used instead of craniofacial ones. A conventional framework was designed to connect the prosthesis to the implant abutments in the anterior nasal floor, and a custom-made ball attachment was positioned in the glabella abutment. A woman with a free rectum abdomis flap covering the defect of the middle face was scheduled for a nasal prosthesis. A titanium framework with a novel connection between the eyeglasses and the prosthesis was manufactured. The two clinical reports presented in this article illustrate favourable clinical treatment outcomes in the rehabilitation of disfigurement.

The radical transbasal approach for resection of anterior and midline skull base lesions

OBJECT

Craniofacial surgery can be performed to treat midline and anterior skull base lesions by creating a bicoronal scalp incision without the need for an additional transfacial procedure. Originally described as the transbasal approach, several modifications for further exposure of the skull base have been described. The authors present data on the application and outcomes of a modified transbasal approach. The radical transbasal approach consists of a bifrontal craniotomy and a frontoorbitonasal osteotomy.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2002, 41 patients (28 male and 13 female patients with a mean age of 38.3 years [range 7-77 years]) underwent 44 radical transbasal procedures. Twenty-three malignant and 18 benign lesions involving the midline skull base were treated. These cases were reviewed retrospectively. Gross-total resection of 30 lesions was achieved. Seven lesions were resected subtotally and six partially; one lesion was debulked. Complications occurred in 26 (59.1%) of the 44 operations and mostly consisted of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. The surgery-related mortality rate was 6.8% (three patients). Based on their pre- and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale scores, 86.4% of patients improved or remained the same.

CONCLUSIONS

The radical transbasal approach increases the midline craniofacial corridor by allowing the globes to be safely retracted laterally. It also enhances exposure of the maxillary sinus from above. The morbidity and mortality rates associated with this procedure are high but consistent with the known rates for craniofacial surgery. This approach is best suited for the treatment of anterior skull base tumors that extend into the nasal cavity, orbit, ethmoid sinus, nasopharynx, and upper clivus. The approach may allow resection of tumors involving the maxillary sinus area without the need for an additional transfacial approach.

Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire

OBJECT

The goal of this study was to develop a disease-specific, multidimensional quality of life (QOL) assessment instrument for patients undergoing surgical extirpation of anterior skull base tumors.

METHODS

This investigation included 35 patients who had been surgically treated for more than 3 months before the study was begun. Relevant QOL questions were generated from a review of the literature and interviews with health professionals, patients, and their caregivers. The initial multidimensional, 80-item questionnaire was reduced to a 35-item questionnaire by using standard psychometric criteria. Six relevant domains were identified using factor analysis: performance, physical function, vitality, pain, specific symptoms, and influence on emotions. The internal consistency of the instrument had a correlation coefficient of 0.8 and a reliability coefficient (test-retest reliability) of 0.9. The validity of the construct was assessed by testing whether the clinical variable of the patient influenced his QOL domain score as hypothesized. Patients older than 60 years of age had significantly poorer scores in the domains of performance and physical function than younger patients. Patients with malignant tumors had significantly poorer scores in the domains of specific symptoms, influence on emotions, physical function, and performance compared with patients with benign tumors. Radiotherapy was associated with poorer scores in the domains of specific symptoms and influence on emotions. Comorbidity was associated with poor physical function scores. Using the final questionnaire, we prospectively evaluated the QOL of 12 additional patients before they underwent surgery and again between 5 and 6 months postoperatively to test the utility and validity of the instrument further. Again, significantly poorer QOL scores were recorded for patients with malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed questionnaire appears to be sufficiently reliable and valid in estimating a patient's QOL after extirpation of anterior skull base tumors. The instrument can be used in face-to-face interviews and via electronic or regular mail.

Head and neck tumors other than squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review deals with classification and treatment of some rare nonsquamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

RECENT FINDINGS

Paranasal sinus tumor classification is under evaluation. Contrary to the past, the recent tendency is to build stage classifications on prognostic factors that mainly reflect limitations for adequate surgery, and not simply on dimensional criteria, which are more frequently used in TNM. Among sinonasal tract tumors new pathologic entities have been described. So far, little is known about their natural history and about the need to use pathologic classification to differentiate treatment. Recent advances in radiotherapeutic techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, will probably have an impact on future treatment of paranasal sinus tumors. Several molecular targets (c-kit, HER-2/neu, androgen receptors) have been identified in salivary gland cancer. It is interesting to note that among different histotypes there is a trend toward a consistent expression of specific markers in specific cancers, suggesting a possible implication of them in the disease histogenesis. Not surprisingly these findings prompted clinical research with molecular targeted drugs.

SUMMARY

Nonsquamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck are rare neoplasms. A multidisciplinary team treatment plan is needed, in particular for skull base-located tumors. Salivary gland cancer displays several molecular targets that need to be investigated further.

Can we assess quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer? A preliminary report from the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics

Survival statistics alone may no longer be valid when used as evidence of effective outcomes. Patient satisfaction is an end point that needs further evaluation and should be included in the outcomes assessment. A 133-item questionnaire has been designed by a special committee of the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics (AAMP) to assess the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer impacting the orofacial region. This survey will be distributed to the entire population of 7 geographically dispersed treatment centers in the United States for a 2-year period. Patients will be stratified into several subgroups, including radiation/nonradiation, maxillary/mandibular, and surgical reconstruction/prostheses. Separate analyses will be conducted for each subgroup, and comparisons will be made within subgroups to test the sensitivity of the questionnaire to a known difference. A revised version of the AAMP questionnaire, limited to 50 items of interest to patients, will be validated against 2 established head and neck cancer questionnaires. This article provides background on previous quality-of-life studies and reviews the need for and aims of the AAMP assessment instrument.