Quality of life in Indian women with fertility problems as assessed by the FertiQoL questionnaire: a single center cross sectional study

Psychiatric morbidity and quality of life in infertile females: a cross-sectional, case-controlled hospital-based study

Background

Infertility is a huge global problem with a significant mental health burden. Infertility could become a source of continuous stress leading to psychosocial issues including stress, anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem in these women. A cross-sectional, case-controlled study was conducted between January 2021 and November 2021 to study the effect of infertility on mental health and quality of life. A semi-structured questionnaire was used for sociodemographic and clinical variables. The Oslo Social Support Scale-3 and FertiQol were used to study social support and quality of life respectively. Psychiatric morbidity was assessed using ICD-10 symptom checklist. A total of 56 cases and 102 controls were studied.

Results

The mean age of cases and controls was 30.4 ± 3.5 years and 31.9 ± 2.9 years, respectively. Young infertile females, primary infertility, and female factor for infertility were associated with higher psychiatric morbidity. Psychiatric morbidity was seen in 46.4% of infertile women. FertiQoL score for the infertile group was 64.61 ± 5 with the lowest score in the emotional domain (45.10) and mind-body domain (54.86) (p < 0.0001). The scores in the relational domain and social domain were higher (85.2 and 73.3, respectively). The scores in the mind-body domain and emotional domain were poor among the infertile women regardless of the presence of psychiatric morbidity (48.27 vs 59.80 and 43.57 vs 46.57) (p < 0.0001–0.04).

Conclusions

Our study emphasizes the role of more qualitative instruments like FertiQoL in studying the well-being of infertile women. Even in the absence of psychiatric morbidity, the QoL score could still predict mental well-being in fertility-related issues.

Stigma predicting fertility quality of life among Chinese infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate stigma and fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) and identify predictors of FertiQoL in Chinese infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

METHODS

A descriptive correlational design was adopted to investigate the association between stigma and FertiQoL in 588 infertile women undergoing IVF-ET. The personal information questionnaire, Infertility Stigma Scale (ISS) and FertiQoL tool were used to measure study variables.

RESULTS

The mean scores of ISS and FertiQoL were 62.59 (SD = 21.58) and 63.64 (SD = 13.72), respectively. There were significant differences of ISS scores among participants with different educational level, residence, occupation, religious belief, financial condition, age group, duration of infertility and infertility treatment, while significant differences of the FertiQoL scores were found in participants with different insurance status, determinism of etiology, infertile type, duration of infertility treatment and cycles of IVF-ET. Pearson's correlation analysis showed stigma was negatively correlated with FertiQoL (r = -0.081 to -0.669, p < .05). The self-devaluation (β = -0.290, p < .001), social withdrawal (β = -0.237, p < .001), family stigma (β = -0.217, p < .001) and insurance status (β = 0.066, p=.035) were identified as the significant predictor of FertiQoL accounting for 43.5% of variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The stigma was significantly associated with FertiQoL in infertile women undergoing IVF-ET with higher level of stigma predicting poorer FertiQoL. More psychological support should be provided to infertile women to reduce stigma and improve FertiQoL.

Depression, anxiety, quality of life and coping in women with infertility: A cross-sectional study from India

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety in women with infertility, elucidate the psycho-social factors affecting infertile women, identify the commonly employed coping strategies, and evaluate their self-esteem and quality of life.

METHODS

A total of 150 women with infertility, from a tertiary care hospital, participated in this study. Cross-sectional assessment was performed by using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, WHO-Quality of life-BREF, and Brief-COPE Inventory.

RESULTS

Overall, 58% (87/150) of women reported depression on HDRS, 24% (36/150) reported anxiety on HAM-A, and 24% (36/150) had both depression and anxiety on HDRS and HAM-A. Comparative analysis of women reporting depression and anxiety indicated that they were subjected to significant discrimination, received lower social acceptance, had financial problems, higher depression and anxiety, poorer quality of life, and employed maladaptive coping. Living in a joint family, and using maladaptive coping were significant risk factors for anxiety and depression. Conversely, the family's ability to provide support, share problems, and assist with decision-making, along with receiving support from their spouses, were chief protective factors.

CONCLUSION

Women with infertility experience depression, anxiety, poor quality of life, and employ maladaptive coping. Supportive relationships with one's family and spouse are chief protective factors.

Fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) among Chinese women undergoing frozen embryo transfer

Background

Women undergoing infertility treatment have poor quality of life. This may cause them to withdraw from or refuse treatment. Women undergoing frozen embryo transfer have a treatment interval. The aim of this study was to investigate the status quo of the fertility quality of life in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer and analyse its predictors.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted from August 2019 to August 2020 among women undergoing frozen embryo transfer in a tertiary hospital reproductive centre in Beijing, China. The survey collected demographic characteristics and treatment data and included the fertility problem inventory, the fertility quality of life scale (FertiQoL) and the state-trait anxiety scale. Multiple linear stepwise regression was used to explore the predictors of fertility quality of life.

Results

In total, 1062 women completed the survey. Participants reported that they had high levels of fertility-related stress and anxiety during treatment. They also had lower fertility-related quality of life, and the Treatment FertiQoL scored the lowest. The regression results showed that social concern, trait anxiety, duration of treatment and age were risk factors for diminished fertility quality of life.

Conclusion

Chinese women undergoing frozen embryo transfer have relatively poor quality of life. The potential predictors of fertility quality of life include social concern, trait anxiety, duration of treatment and age.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-021-01325-1.

Assessment of Impact of Infertility & its Treatment on Quality of Life of Infertile Couples using Fertility Quality of Life Questionnaire

Background:

With rising trends of infertility in India, it is no longer just a medical concern, but is rapidly becoming a public health issue due to its social and interpersonal ramifications. Limited data is available regarding quality of life of the infertile couples.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to understand the quality of life (QOL) of Indian infertile couples using the fertility QOL (FertiQoL) tool and to find the correlation between the values of the core and treatment FertiQoL and various sociodemographic and clinical factors.

Study Setting and Design:

This cross-sectional study was conducted at fertility clinic at an urban tertiary care center.

Materials and Methods:

Over a period of 12 months, 274 completed questionnaires obtained from 137 couples were selected for the analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics of all the patients were recorded. Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 25:0. IBM Chicago, USA.

Results:

Women had worse QOL than their male partners. They scored lower than men on emotional and mind body subscales. Women showed positive and uniform trend in mean scores of all core FertiQoL subscales with age and education. Rural population had poorer QOL. Patients with primary infertility had poorer QOL except in the relational domain. Couples, in whom both partners had some pathology, had the worse QOL compared to female factor, male factor or unexplained infertility.

Conclusion:

Our study is a step in the direction to establish the baseline QOL objectively in Indian couples with infertility.

Quality of life among infertile women with endometriosis undergoing IVF treatment and their pregnancy outcomes

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the quality of life (QoL) and pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment among infertile women with endometriosis, as compared to infertile women without endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-one (81) endometriosis women (with 142 embryo transfer [ET] cycles) and 605 non-endometriosis women (with 1063 ET cycles) were included. QoL was measured by FertiQoL at the date before ET. Pregnancy outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and live birth. Generalized estimating equation analyses were performed to assess the association between QoL and IVF pregnancy.

RESULTS

Endometriosis-affected women had significantly lower QoL, as indicated by mind/body, treatment environment and total treatment scores, and total scores of FertiQoL (p < .05), compared to those without endometriosis. Among non-endometriosis women, QoL scores were significantly associated with successful IVF pregnancy; with one unit increase in QoL scores as measured by emotional domain of FertiQoL, the probabilities of ongoing pregnancy and live birth significantly increased by 2.5% and 2.8%, respectively (p < .05). This association was also observed among endometriosis women but it did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower QoL among women with endometriosis versus non-endometriosis during IVF treatment highlights the importance of developing strategies to improve their QoL, which may enhance following pregnancy rates in this population.

The novel use of fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) treatment subscale to assess treatment acceptability in social egg freezing

This is the first study to assess the impact of social egg freezing (SEF) on quality of life. This cross-sectional survey utilised the FertiQoL treatment module in women who underwent SEF between January 2008 and October 2019 (n = 94). The mean treatment score was 65.5, whereas the tolerability and environment scores were 62.4 and 68 respectively. Being married or in a relationship was associated with higher, albeit not statistically significant, scores (69.2) when compared to single women (66.3; p = 0.49). However, being separated or divorced was associated with significantly worse scores compared to married women, women in a relationship and single women (43.3 vs. 67.0; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in scores between younger and older women, low and high number of oocytes stored, duration of stimulation cycles, or in those who had single or multiple cycles. These data suggest SEF is largely tolerable, with favourable FertiQoL scores compared to infertile women undergoing IVF. However, whilst such women are physiologically fertile, their situation renders them socially infertile. As such, women undergoing SEF should be identified as a population that requires additional support, who should be offered extensive counselling, active monitoring throughout the process and additional support if required.