The effect of time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia on planned equivalent radiation dose

Biological treatment evaluation in thermoradiotherapy: application in cervical cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermia treatment quality is usually evaluated by thermal (dose) parameters, though hyperthermic radiosensitization effects are also influenced by the time interval between the two modalities. This work applies biological modelling for clinical treatment evaluation of cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia by calculating the equivalent radiation dose (EQDRT, i.e., the dose needed for the same effect with radiation alone). Subsequent analyses evaluate the impact of logistics.

METHODS

Biological treatment evaluation was performed for 58 patients treated with 23-28 fractions of 1.8-2 Gy plus 4-5 weekly hyperthermia sessions. Measured temperatures (T50) and recorded time intervals between the radiotherapy and hyperthermia sessions were used to calculate the EQDRT using an extended linear quadratic (LQ) model with hyperthermic LQ parameters based on extensive experimental data. Next, the impact of a 30-min time interval (optimized logistics) as well as a 4‑h time interval (suboptimal logistics) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Median average measured T50 and recorded time intervals were 41.2 °C (range 39.7-42.5 °C) and 79 min (range 34-125 min), respectively, resulting in a median total dose enhancement (D50) of 5.5 Gy (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-6.6 Gy). For 30-min time intervals, the enhancement would increase by ~30% to 7.1 Gy (IQR 5.5-8.1 Gy; p < 0.001). In case of 4‑h time intervals, an ~ 40% decrease in dose enhancement could be expected: 3.2 Gy (IQR 2.3-3.8 Gy; p < 0.001). Normal tissue enhancement was negligible (< 0.3 Gy), even for short time intervals.

CONCLUSION

Biological treatment evaluation is a useful addition to standard thermal (dose) evaluation of hyperthermia treatments. Optimizing logistics to shorten time intervals seems worthwhile to improve treatment efficacy.

A Novel Framework for Thermoradiotherapy Treatment Planning

PURPOSE

Thermoradiotherapy combines radiation therapy with hyperthermia to increase therapeutic effectiveness. Currently, both modalities are optimized separately and in state-of-the-art research the enhanced therapeutic effect is evaluated using equivalent radiation dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2). This study proposes a novel thermoradiotherapy treatment planning framework with voxelwise EQD2 radiation therapy optimizing including thermal radiosensitization and direct thermal cytotoxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

To demonstrate proof-of-concept of the planning framework, 3 strategies consisting of 20 radiation therapy fractions were planned for 4 prostate cancer cases with substantially different temperature distributions: (1) Conventional radiation therapy plan of 60 Gy combined with 4 hyperthermia sessions (RT60 + HT), (2) standalone uniform dose escalation to 68 Gy without hyperthermia (RT68), and (3) uniform target EQD2 that maximizes the tumor control probability (TCP) accounting for voxelwise thermal effects of 4 hyperthermia sessions without increasing normal tissue doses (RTHT + HT). Assessment included dose, EQD2, TCP, and rectal normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), alongside robustness analyses for TCP and NTCP against parameter uncertainties.

RESULTS

The estimated TCP of around 76% for RT60 without hyperthermia was increased to an average of 85.9% (range, 81.3%-90.5%) for RT60 + HT, 92.5% (92.4%-92.5%) for RT68, and 94.4% (91.7%-96.6%) for RTHT + HT. The corresponding averaged rectal NTCPs were 8.7% (7.9%-10.0%), 14.9% (13.8%-17.1%), and 8.4% (7.5%-9.7%), respectively. RT68 and RTHT + HT exhibited slightly enhanced TCP robustness against parameter uncertainties compared with RT60 + HT, and RT68 presented higher and less robust rectal NTCP values compared with the other planning strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study introduces an innovative thermoradiotherapy planning approach, integrating thermal effects into EQD2-based radiation therapy optimization. Results demonstrate an ability to achieve enhanced and uniform target EQD2 and TCP across various temperature distributions without elevating normal tissue EQD2 or NTCP compared with conventional methods. Although promising for improving clinical outcomes, realizable enhancements depend on accurate tumor- and tissue-specific data and precise quantification of hyperthermic effects, which are seamlessly integrable in the planning framework as they emerge.

The Relevance of High Temperatures and Short Time Intervals Between Radiation Therapy and Hyperthermia: Insights in Terms of Predicted Equivalent Enhanced Radiation Dose

PURPOSE

The radiosensitization effect of hyperthermia can be considered and quantified as an enhanced equivalent radiation dose (EQD_RT), that is, the dose needed to achieve the same effect without hyperthermia. EQD_RT can be predicted using an extended linear quadratic model, with temperature-dependent parameters. Clinical data show that both the achieved temperature and time interval between radiation therapy and hyperthermia correlate with clinical outcome, but their effect on expected EQD_RT is unknown and was therefore evaluated in this study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Biological modeling was performed using our in-house developed software (X-Term), considering a 23- × 2-Gy external beam radiation scheme, as applied for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. First, the EQD_RT was calculated for homogeneous temperature levels, evaluating time intervals between 0 and 4 hours. Next, realistic heterogeneous hyperthermia treatment plans were combined with radiation therapy plans and the EQD_RT was calculated for 10 patients. Furthermore, the effect of achieving 0.5°C to 1°C lower or higher temperatures was evaluated.

RESULTS

EQD_RT increases substantially with both increasing temperature and decreasing time interval. The effect of the time interval is most pronounced at higher temperatures (>41°C). At a typical hyperthermic temperature level of 41.5°C, an enhancement of ∼10 Gy can be realized with a 0-hour time interval, which is decreased to only ∼4 Gy enhancement with a 4-hour time interval. Most enhancement is already lost after 1 hour. Evaluation in patients predicted an average additional EQD_RT (D95%) of 2.2 and 6.3 Gy for 4- and 0-hour time intervals, respectively. The effect of 0.5°C to 1°C lower or higher temperatures is most pronounced at high temperature levels and short time intervals. The additional EQD_RT (D95%) ranged between 1.5 and 3.3 Gy and between 4.5 and 8.5 Gy for 4- and 0-hour time intervals, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biological modeling provides relevant insight into the relationship between treatment parameters and expected EQD_RT. Both high temperatures and short time intervals are essential to maximize EQD_RT.

Biological modeling in thermoradiotherapy: present status and ongoing developments toward routine clinical use

Biological modeling for anti-cancer treatments using mathematical models can be very supportive in gaining more insight into dynamic processes responsible for cellular response to treatment, and predicting, evaluating and optimizing therapeutic effects of treatment. This review presents an overview of the current status of biological modeling for hyperthermia in combination with radiotherapy (thermoradiotherapy). Various distinct models have been proposed in the literature, with varying complexity; initially aiming to model the effect of hyperthermia alone, and later on to predict the effect of the combined thermoradiotherapy treatment. Most commonly used models are based on an extension of the linear-quadratic (LQ)-model enabling an easy translation to radiotherapy where the LQ model is widely used. Basic predictions of cell survival have further progressed toward 3 D equivalent dose predictions, i.e., the radiation dose that would be needed without hyperthermia to achieve the same biological effect as the combined thermoradiotherapy treatment. This approach, with the use of temperature-dependent model parameters, allows theoretical evaluation of the effectiveness of different treatment strategies in individual patients, as well as in patient cohorts. This review discusses the significant progress that has been made in biological modeling for hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy. In the future, when adequate temperature-dependent LQ-parameters will be available for a large number of tumor sites and normal tissues, biological modeling can be expected to be of great clinical importance to further optimize combined treatments, optimize clinical protocols and guide further clinical studies.

Detailed in vitro analyses of the impact of multimodal cancer therapy with hyperthermia and radiotherapy on the immune phenotype of human glioblastoma cells

PURPOSE

Improvements of heat-delivery systems have led to hyperthermia (HT) being increasingly recognized as an adjunct treatment modality also for brain tumors. But how HT affects the immune phenotype of glioblastoma cells is only scarcely known.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We therefore investigated the effect of in vitro HT, radiotherapy (RT), and the combination of both (RHT) on cell death modalities, immune checkpoint molecule (ICM) expression and release of the danger signal HSP70 of two human glioblastoma cell lines (U87 and U251) by using multicolor flow cytometry and ELISA. Hyperthermia was performed once or twice for 60-minute sessions reaching temperatures of 39 °C, 41 °C, and 44 °C, respectively. RT was administered with 5 x 2 Gy.

RESULTS

A hyperthermia chamber for cell culture t-flasks regulating the temperature via a contact sensor was developed. While the glioblastoma cells were rather radioresistant, particularly in U251 cells, the combination of RT with HT significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic and necrotic cells for all temperatures examined and for both, single and double HT application. In line with that, an increased release of HSP 70 was seen only in U251 cells, mainly following treatment with HT at temperatures of 44 °C alone or in combination with RT. In contrast, immune suppressive (PD-L1, PD-L2, HVEM) and immune stimulatory (ICOS-L, CD137-L and Ox40-L) ICMs were significantly increased mostly on U87 cells, and particularly after RHT with 41 °C.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual assessment of the glioblastoma immune cell phenotype with regard to the planned treatment is mandatory to optimize multimodal radio-immunotherapy protocols including HT.

Immunogenic cell death and its therapeutic or prognostic potential in high-grade glioma

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) has emerged as a key component of therapy-induced anti-tumor immunity. Over the past few years, ICD was found to play a pivotal role in a wide variety of novel and existing treatment modalities. The clinical application of these techniques in cancer treatment is still in its infancy. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal primary brain tumor with a dismal prognosis despite maximal therapy. The development of new therapies in this aggressive type of tumors remains highly challenging partially due to the cold tumor immune environment. GBM could therefore benefit from ICD-based therapies stimulating the anti-tumor immune response. In what follows, we will describe the mechanisms behind ICD and the ICD-based (pre)clinical advances in anticancer therapies focusing on GBM.

Radiobiological Evaluation of Combined Gamma Knife Radiosurgery and Hyperthermia for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology

Simple Summary

This study proposes a novel strategy in brain cancer management. Stereotactic radiosurgery delivered by the Gamma Knife was combined with hyperthermia. For the radiobiological modelling of this synergistic treatment modality, we used the linear-quadratic model with temperature-dependent parameters to assess the potential enhancement of the therapeutic outcome. The results indicate that focused intracranial heating can be used to boost the dose to the target. Alternatively, one can conclude that for the same therapeutic effect, hyperthermia can help to minimize the dose undesirably delivered to healthy tissues. This study is also the first to advocate a combination of stereotactic radiosurgery with focused heating and motivates the future development of hyperthermia systems for brain cancer treatment.

Abstract

Combining radiotherapy (RT) with hyperthermia (HT) has been proven effective in the treatment of a wide range of tumours, but the combination of externally delivered, focused heat and stereotactic radiosurgery has never been investigated. We explore the potential of such treatment enhancement via radiobiological modelling, specifically via the linear-quadratic (LQ) model adapted to thermoradiotherapy through modulating the radiosensitivity of temperature-dependent parameters. We extend this well-established model by incorporating oxygenation effects. To illustrate the methodology, we present a clinically relevant application in pediatric oncology, which is novel in two ways. First, it deals with medulloblastoma, the most common malignant brain tumour in children, a type of brain tumour not previously reported in the literature of thermoradiotherapy studies. Second, it makes use of the Gamma Knife for the radiotherapy part, thereby being the first of its kind in this context. Quantitative metrics like the biologically effective dose (BED) and the tumour control probability (TCP) are used to assess the efficacy of the combined plan.

Advanced patient-specific hyperthermia treatment planning

Hyperthermia treatment planning (HTP) is valuable to optimize tumor heating during thermal therapy delivery. Yet, clinical hyperthermia treatment plans lack quantitative accuracy due to uncertainties in tissue properties and modeling, and report tumor absorbed power and temperature distributions which cannot be linked directly to treatment outcome. Over the last decade, considerable progress has been made to address these inaccuracies and therefore improve the reliability of hyperthermia treatment planning. Patient-specific electrical tissue conductivity derived from MR measurements has been introduced to accurately model the power deposition in the patient. Thermodynamic fluid modeling has been developed to account for the convective heat transport in fluids such as urine in the bladder. Moreover, discrete vasculature trees have been included in thermal models to account for the impact of thermally significant large blood vessels. Computationally efficient optimization strategies based on SAR and temperature distributions have been established to calculate the phase-amplitude settings that provide the best tumor thermal dose while avoiding hot spots in normal tissue. Finally, biological modeling has been developed to quantify the hyperthermic radiosensitization effect in terms of equivalent radiation dose of the combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatment. In this paper, we review the present status of these developments and illustrate the most relevant advanced elements within a single treatment planning example of a cervical cancer patient. The resulting advanced HTP workflow paves the way for a clinically feasible and more reliable patient-specific hyperthermia treatment planning.

Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review

The therapeutic application of heat is very effective in cancer treatment. Both hyperthermia, i.e., heating to 39-45 °C to induce sensitization to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and thermal ablation, where temperatures beyond 50 °C destroy tumor cells directly are frequently applied in the clinic. Achievement of an effective treatment requires high quality heating equipment, precise thermal dosimetry, and adequate quality assurance. Several types of devices, antennas and heating or power delivery systems have been proposed and developed in recent decades. These vary considerably in technique, heating depth, ability to focus, and in the size of the heating focus. Clinically used heating techniques involve electromagnetic and ultrasonic heating, hyperthermic perfusion and conductive heating. Depending on clinical objectives and available technology, thermal therapies can be subdivided into three broad categories: local, locoregional, or whole body heating. Clinically used local heating techniques include interstitial hyperthermia and ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), scanned focused ultrasound (SFUS), electroporation, nanoparticle heating, intraluminal heating and superficial heating. Locoregional heating techniques include phased array systems, capacitive systems and isolated perfusion. Whole body techniques focus on prevention of heat loss supplemented with energy deposition in the body, e.g., by infrared radiation. This review presents an overview of clinical hyperthermia and ablation devices used for local, locoregional, and whole body therapy. Proven and experimental clinical applications of thermal ablation and hyperthermia are listed. Methods for temperature measurement and the role of treatment planning to control treatments are discussed briefly, as well as future perspectives for heating technology for the treatment of tumors.

Exploring the rationale for thermotherapy in COVID-19

Increased transmissibility of the pandemic severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been noted to occur at lower ambient temperatures. This is seemingly related to a better replication of most respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, at lower-than-core body temperatures (i.e., 33 °C vs 37 °C). Also, intrinsic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 make it a heat-susceptible pathogen. Thermotherapy has successfully been used to combat viral infections in plants which could otherwise result in great economic losses; 90% of viruses causing infections in plants are positive-sense single-stranded ribonucleic acid (+ssRNA) viruses, a characteristic shared by SARS-CoV-2. Thus, it is possible to envision the use of heat-based interventions (thermotherapy or mild-temperature hyperthermia) in patients with COVID-19 for which moderate cycles (every 8-12 h) of mild-temperature hyperthermia (1-2 h) have been proposed. However, there are potential safety and mechanistic concerns which could limit the use of thermotherapy only to patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 to prevent disease progression rather than to treat patients who have already progressed to severe-to-critical COVID-19. Here, we review the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 which make it a heat-susceptible virus, potential host mechanisms which could be enhanced at higher temperatures to aid viral clearance, and how thermotherapy could be investigated as a modality of treatment in patients with COVID-19 while taking into consideration potential risks.

Mathematical model for the thermal enhancement of radiation response: thermodynamic approach

Radiotherapy can effectively kill malignant cells, but the doses required to cure cancer patients may inflict severe collateral damage to adjacent healthy tissues. Recent technological advances in the clinical application has revitalized hyperthermia treatment (HT) as an option to improve radiotherapy (RT) outcomes. Understanding the synergistic effect of simultaneous thermoradiotherapy via mathematical modelling is essential for treatment planning. We here propose a theoretical model in which the thermal enhancement ratio (TER) relates to the cell fraction being radiosensitised by the infliction of sublethal damage through HT. Further damage finally kills the cell or abrogates its proliferative capacity in a non-reversible process. We suggest the TER to be proportional to the energy invested in the sensitisation, which is modelled as a simple rate process. Assuming protein denaturation as the main driver of HT-induced sublethal damage and considering the temperature dependence of the heat capacity of cellular proteins, the sensitisation rates were found to depend exponentially on temperature; in agreement with previous empirical observations. Our findings point towards an improved definition of thermal dose in concordance with the thermodynamics of protein denaturation. Our predictions well reproduce experimental in vitro and in vivo data, explaining the thermal modulation of cellular radioresponse for simultaneous thermoradiotherapy.

Integrating Loco-Regional Hyperthermia Into the Current Oncology Practice: SWOT and TOWS Analyses

Moderate hyperthermia at temperatures between 40 and 44°C is a multifaceted therapeutic modality. It is a potent radiosensitizer, interacts favorably with a host of chemotherapeutic agents, and, in combination with radiotherapy, enforces immunomodulation akin to “in situ tumor vaccination.” By sensitizing hypoxic tumor cells and inhibiting repair of radiotherapy-induced DNA damage, the properties of hyperthermia delivered together with photons might provide a tumor-selective therapeutic advantage analogous to high linear energy transfer (LET) neutrons, but with less normal tissue toxicity. Furthermore, the high LET attributes of hyperthermia thermoradiobiologically are likely to enhance low LET protons; thus, proton thermoradiotherapy would mimic ¹²C ion therapy. Hyperthermia with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy substantially improves therapeutic outcomes without enhancing normal tissue morbidities, yielding level I evidence reported in several randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various tumor sites. Technological advancements in hyperthermia delivery, advancements in hyperthermia treatment planning, online invasive and non-invasive MR-guided thermometry, and adherence to quality assurance guidelines have ensured safe and effective delivery of hyperthermia to the target region. Novel biological modeling permits integration of hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment plans. Further, hyperthermia along with immune checkpoint inhibitors and DNA damage repair inhibitors could further augment the therapeutic efficacy resulting in synthetic lethality. Additionally, hyperthermia induced by magnetic nanoparticles coupled to selective payloads, namely, tumor-specific radiotheranostics (for both tumor imaging and radionuclide therapy), chemotherapeutic drugs, immunotherapeutic agents, and gene silencing, could provide a comprehensive tumor-specific theranostic modality akin to “magic (nano)bullets.” To get a realistic overview of the strength (S), weakness (W), opportunities (O), and threats (T) of hyperthermia, a SWOT analysis has been undertaken. Additionally, a TOWS analysis categorizes future strategies to facilitate further integration of hyperthermia with the current treatment modalities. These could gainfully accomplish a safe, versatile, and cost-effective enhancement of the existing therapeutic armamentarium to improve outcomes in clinical oncology.

Differences of the Immune Phenotype of Breast Cancer Cells after Ex Vivo Hyperthermia by Warm-Water or Microwave Radiation in a Closed-Loop System Alone or in Combination with Radiotherapy

The treatment of breast cancer by radiotherapy can be complemented by hyperthermia. Little is known about how the immune phenotype of tumor cells is changed thereby, also in terms of a dependence on the heating method. We developed a sterile closed-loop system, using either a warm-water bath or a microwave at 2.45 GHz to examine the impact of ex vivo hyperthermia on cell death, the release of HSP70, and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules (ICMs) on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells by multicolor flow cytometry and ELISA. Heating was performed between 39 and 44 °C. Numerical process simulations identified temperature distributions. Additionally, irradiation with 2 × 5 Gy or 5 × 2 Gy was applied. We observed a release of HSP70 after hyperthermia at all examined temperatures and independently of the heating method, but microwave heating was more effective in cell killing, and microwave heating with and without radiotherapy increased subsequent HSP70 concentrations. Adding hyperthermia to radiotherapy, dynamically or individually, affected the expression of the ICM PD-L1, PD-L2, HVEM, ICOS-L, CD137-L, OX40-L, CD27-L, and EGFR on breast cancer cells. Well-characterized pre-clinical heating systems are mandatory to screen the immune phenotype of tumor cells in clinically relevant settings to define immune matrices for therapy adaption.

The Role of Hyperthermia in the Multidisciplinary Treatment of Malignant Tumors

Hyperthermia is often used in combination with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer treatment. Recently, immunotherapy has become a popular research area, breaking exciting new ground with concurrent immunotherapy and hyperthermia. Much evidence has demonstrated the effectiveness of multidisciplinary synergistic therapy, and the underlying mechanism has been gradually explored. In this review, we focus on the mechanism of various cancer treatments in the current literature and recent advances in hyperthermia. Additionally, we review clinical studies of hyperthermia combined with other therapies in the previous 10 years and propose future prospects for hyperthermia in multidisciplinary synergistic therapy.

Radiosensitization by Hyperthermia: The Effects of Temperature, Sequence, and Time Interval in Cervical Cell Lines

Cervical cancers are almost exclusively caused by an infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV). When patients suffering from cervical cancer have contraindications for chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy combined with hyperthermia is a good treatment option. Radiation-induced DNA breaks can be repaired by nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). Hyperthermia can temporarily inactivate homologous recombination. Therefore, combining radiotherapy with hyperthermia can result in the persistence of more fatal radiation-induced DNA breaks. However, there is no consensus on the optimal sequence of radiotherapy and hyperthermia and the optimal time interval between these modalities. Moreover, the temperature of hyperthermia and HPV-type may also be important in radiosensitization by hyperthermia. In this study we thoroughly investigated the impact of different temperatures (37–42 °C), and the sequence of and time interval (0 up to 4 h) between ionizing radiation and hyperthermia on HPV16⁺: SiHa, Caski; HPV18⁺: HeLa, C4I; and HPV⁻: C33A, HT3 cervical cancer cell lines. Our results demonstrate that a short time interval between treatments caused more unrepaired DNA damages and more cell kill, especially at higher temperatures. Although hyperthermia before ionizing radiation may result in slightly more DNA damage, the sequence between hyperthermia and ionizing radiation yielded similar effects on cell survival.

Molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer

Mild hyperthermia, local heating of the tumour up to temperatures <43 °C, has been clinically applied for almost four decades and has been proven to substantially enhance the effectiveness of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy in treatment of primary and recurrent tumours. Clinical results and mechanisms of action are discussed in this review, including the molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer as established in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Proven mechanisms include inhibition of different DNA repair processes, (in)direct reduction of the hypoxic tumour cell fraction, enhanced drug uptake, increased perfusion and oxygen levels. All mechanisms show different dose effect relationships and different optimal scheduling with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Therefore, obtaining the ideal multi-modality treatment still requires elucidation of more detailed data on dose, sequence, duration, and possible synergisms between modalities. A multidisciplinary approach with different modalities including hyperthermia might further increase anti-tumour effects and diminish normal tissue damage.

Role of Simulations in the Treatment Planning of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia Therapy in Clinics

Hyperthermia therapy is a treatment modality in which tumor temperatures are elevated to higher temperatures to cause damage to cancerous tissues. Numerical simulations are integral in the development of hyperthermia treatment systems and in clinical treatment planning. In this study, simulations in radiofrequency hyperthermia therapy are reviewed in terms of their technical development and clinical aspects for effective clinical use. This review offers an overview of mathematical models and the importance of tissue properties; locoregional mild hyperthermia therapy, including phantom and realistic human anatomy models; phase array systems; tissue damage; thermal dose analysis; and thermoradiotherapy planning. This review details the improvements in numerical approaches in treatment planning and their application for effective clinical use. Furthermore, the modeling of thermoradiotherapy planning, which can be integrated with radiotherapy to provide combined hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment planning strategies, are also discussed. This review may contribute to the effective development of thermoradiotherapy planning in clinics.

Hyperthermia with radiotherapy reduces tumour alpha/beta: Insights from trials of thermoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone

PURPOSE

Hyperthermia inhibits the repair of irradiation-induced DNA damage and thereby could alter the α/β values of tumours. This study estimates the clinical α/β_HTRT values from clinical trials of thermoradiotherapy (HTRT) vs radiotherapy (RT) in recurrent breast (RcBC), head and neck (III/IV) (LAHNC) and cervix cancers (IIB-IVA) (LACC).

METHODS

Three recently published meta-analyses for HTRT vs RT in RcBC, LAHNC and LACC were evaluated for complete response (CR). Studies with specified RT dose (D), dose/fraction (d) and corresponding CRs were selected. Tumour biological effective dose (BED) for each study with RT (BED_RT) was computed assuming an α/β_RT of 10 Gy. As outcomes were favourable with HTRT, thermoradiobiological BED (BED_HTRT) was calculated as a product of BED_RT and %CR_HTRT/%CR_RT. The α/β_HTRT was estimated as Dd/(BED_HTRT - D).

RESULTS

12 trials with 864 patients were shortlisted - RcBC (3 studies, n = 259), LAHNC (5 studies, n = 338) and LACC (4 studies, n = 267). Overall risk difference of 0.28 favoured HTRT (p < 0.001). Mean BED_RT and BED_HTRT were 64.7 Gy (SD: ±15.5) and 109.5 Gy (SD: ±32.1) respectively and global α/β_HTRT was 2.25 Gy (SD: ±0.79). Mean α/β_HTRT for RcBC, LAHNC and LACC were 2.05 Gy, 1.74 Gy and 3.03 Gy respectively. On meta-regression, α/β_HTRT was the sole predictor for the corresponding risk differences of the studies (coefficient = -0.096; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Thermoradiobiological effects on the repair of RT induced DNA damage results in reduction in α/β values of tumours. This should be considered to effectively optimize HTRT dose-fractionation schedules in the clinic.

Cell line-specific efficacy of thermoradiotherapy in human and canine cancer cells in vitro

Objective

Aims were to investigate sensitivity of various human and canine cancer cell lines to hyperthermia and the influence of particular treatment conditions, and to analyze the DNA-damage response and mode of cell death in cell line radiosensitized by hyperthermia. Additionally, we were interested in the involvement of HSP70 in radiosensitization.

Methods

Radiosensitization by hyperthermia was determined in a panel of human and canine cancer cell lines using clonogenic cell survival assay, as well as levels of heat shock proteins (HSPs) using immunoblotting. The influence of the hyperthermia-radiotherapy time gap, different temperatures and the order of treatments on clonogenicity of hyperthermia-sensitive A549 cells was investigated. Additionally, DNA damage and cell death were assessed by Comet assay and an apoptosis/necrosis assay. Further we induced transient knockdown in A549 cells to test HSP70’s involvement in radiosensitization.

Results

Out of eight cell lines tested, only two (A549 and Abrams) showed significant decrease in clonogenic cell survival when pre-treated with hyperthermia at 42°C. Strong induction of HSP70 upon thermoradiotherapy (HT-RT) treatment was found in all cell lines. Transient knockdown of HSP70 in A549 cells did not result in decrease of clonogenic cell survival in response to HT-RT.

Conclusion

Tumor cell-type, temperature and order of treatment play an important role in radiosensitization by hyperthermia. However, hyperthermia has limited potency to radiosensitize canine cancer cells grown in a 2D cell culture setting presented here. DNA damage and apoptosis/necrosis did not increase upon combined treatment and cytosolic levels of HSP70 appear not to play critical role in the radiosensitization of A549 cells.

Re‑irradiation plus hyperthermia for recurrent pediatric sarcoma; a simulation study to investigate feasibility

Recurrent pediatric tumors pose a challenge since treatment options may be limited, particularly after previous irradiation. Positive results have been reported for chemotherapy and hyperthermia, but the combination of re‑irradiation and hyperthermia has not been investigated thus far, although it is a proven treatment strategy in adults. The theoretical feasibility of re‑irradiation plus hyperthermia was investigated for infield recurrent pediatric sarcoma in the pelvic region and the extremities. A total of 46 recurrent pediatric sarcoma cases diagnosed at the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) between 2002 and 2017 were evaluated. Patients not previously irradiated, outfield recurrences and locations other than the pelvis and extremities were excluded, ultimately yielding four eligible patients: Two with sarcomas in the pelvis and two in an extremity. Re‑irradiation and hyperthermia treatment plans were simulated for 23x2 Gy treatment schedules and weekly hyperthermia. The radiosensitizing effect of hyperthermia was quantified using biological modelling with a temperature‑dependent change in the parameters of the linear‑quadratic model. The possible effectiveness of re‑irradiation plus hyperthermia was estimated by calculating the equivalent radiotherapy dose distribution. Treatment planning revealed that tumors located in the pelvis and the extremities can be effectively heated in children. Equivalent dose distributions indicated that hyperthermic radiosensitization can be quantified as a target‑selective additional D95% of typically 10 Gy, thereby delivering a possibly curative dose of 54 Gy, without substantially increasing the equivalent dose to the organs at risk. Therefore, re‑irradiation plus hyperthermia is a theoretically feasible and possibly effective treatment option for recurrent pediatric sarcoma in the pelvic region and the extremities, and its clinical feasibility is worthy of evaluation.

Immunogenic Effect of Hyperthermia on Enhancing Radiotherapeutic Efficacy

Hyperthermia is a cancer treatment where tumor tissue is heated to around 40 °C. Hyperthermia shows both cancer cell cytotoxicity and immune response stimulation via immune cell activation. Immunogenic responses encompass the innate and adaptive immune systems, involving the activation of macrophages, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, and T cells. Moreover, hyperthermia is commonly used in combination with different treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, for better clinical outcomes. In this review, we will focus on hyperthermia-induced immunogenic effects and molecular events to improve radiotherapy efficacy. The beneficial potential of integrating radiotherapy with hyperthermia is also discussed.