Ultrasound-guided transvaginal radiofrequency ablation combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for symptomatic uterine adenomyosis treatment

Advances in Adenomyosis Treatment: High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound, Percutaneous Microwave Therapy, and Radiofrequency Ablation

Background/Objectives: Adenomyosis is a debilitating gynecologic condition that affects both multiparous older women and nulliparous younger women, inducing a variety of symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, and infertility. Thermal ablation techniques are new procedures that have been proposed for the treatment of adenomyosis. They include high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Because thermal ablation techniques are minimally invasive or noninvasive, fertility is not impaired while symptoms improve. In addition, hospital stays and financial costs are generally reduced, increasing the interest in these alternative management options. Methods: In this narrative review, we conducted a thorough literature search of PubMed/Medline from the database inception to September 2022. In our search, we focused on noninvasive treatment methods such as HIFU ablation, RFA ablation, and PMWA as well as adenomyosis-specific terms and noninvasive techniques (ultrasonography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging). The queries were a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. The search was limited to the English language. Abstracts were screened according to their content, and relevant articles were selected. Results: Overall, the results showed that the above-mentioned ablation techniques are effective and safe in providing adenomyosis treatment. Lesion size and uterus volume are reduced, leading to considerable symptom alleviation with all three methods. Positive results concerning safety and fertility preservation have been described as well. Conclusions: Nonetheless, more research is required in this field to compare the efficacy and safety of different ablation techniques with traditional therapies. Such research will help improve these procedures and their associated decision-making processes.

An Updated Review of Thermal Ablation Technology for Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis: Focusing on Protecting Fertility

There is a growing trend towards minimally invasive or noninvasive alternatives for gynecological disorders due to their rapid alleviation of symptom, expedited recovery, and minimal risks of postoperative complications. Thermal ablation technology has been commonly advocated as a minimally invasive therapeutic methods in recent years, including microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. The increasing application scenarios require updated and systematic research, and more evidence to promote their appropriate use. The objective of this review is to summarize the latest views of ablation from a prospective of fertility protection, endeavor to clarify the clinical value of thermal ablation technology in protecting fertility by assessing parameters such as ablation rates, alleviation of disease symptoms, re-intervention rates and post-treatment pregnancy rates. We review the clinical studies of ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis treatment in the past 10 years, summarize the limitation and the prospects of its development in the treatment process, so as to provide clinicians with advice on the best practice. In the management of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis, thermal ablation technology offers improved fertility preservation and minimizes normal tissue injury compared to traditional surgical approaches for patients pursuing reproductive goals. In the future, thermal ablation technology will play a significantly enhanced role in preserving fertility for individuals requiring treatment for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis, guided by indications. But further research is still needed in the form of more extensive randomized prospective trials to provide stronger evidence supporting this perspective.

Alternative treatments of adenomyosis - an update in procedural management and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adenomyosis is a common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain. Definitive diagnosis and treatment have historically been by uterine histopathology at time of hysterectomy; however, advances in imaging have supported earlier diagnosis and subsequent conservative treatment. This review aims to update the evidence supporting the uterine-sparing, procedural management options with a focus on clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Uterine artery embolization (UAE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA), and adenomyomectomy are minimally invasive interventions proven to be effective in reducing AUB and dysmenorrhea due to adenomyosis. Symptom improvement is associated with a decrease in uterine volume. Studies support the use of alternative treatment options given the overall low rates of symptom recurrence and reintervention. Combination therapy may be more effective than monotherapy.

SUMMARY

This review provides the current evidence for use of alternative treatment options for adenomyosis. Access to ablative therapies in the USA is limited and primarily off label, given lack of FDA approval. High-quality prospective and randomized controlled trials are needed in order to further delineate treatment comparisons, efficacy, safety, and ideal patient selection for these treatments. More data are needed to assess safety and utility in those desiring future fertility.

Conservative surgical treatment for adenomyosis: New options for looking beyond uterus removal

Adenomyosis is a common benign uterine disorders and patients may present dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and infertility. The treatment is very complex, including medical, surgical or radiological approaches. Hormonal drugs represent the first line therapy of adenomyosis, highly effective on symptoms and uterine volume reduction. Radiological procedures (UAE and HIFU), RFA and hysteroscopy may be proposed in those cases in which medical therapy is ineffective. Considering surgical treatment, hysterectomy remains the only existing definitive treatment but in the last decades the desire of uterus preservation is becoming more and more diffuse. On the other hand, surgical conservative treatments of adenomyosis are very effective in ameliorating AUB and pelvic pain and in reducing uterine volume, with some post-operative risks and obstetrics complications. Cytoreductive surgery for adenomyosis may be very complex, therefore it should be performed by experienced surgeons in dedicated centers, above all in case of concomitant endometriosis.

The Impact of Conservative Surgical Treatment of Adenomyosis on Fertility and Perinatal Outcomes

Adenomyosis is a benign condition commonly encountered in patients with infertility. While the definitive surgical management is hysterectomy, conservative surgical management is gaining attention in patients desiring future fertility. This review explores whether the surgical treatment of adenomyosis affects fertility outcomes for patients trying to conceive. The PubMed and Medline databases were searched using the keywords: "adenomyosis", "surgery", "radiofrequency", "infertility", "pregnancy", "sterility", "conception", "miscarriage", and "endometrial receptivity". Abstracts were screened, and relevant articles were selected for review. This review reveals that surgery appears to improve fertility outcomes with or without medical therapy; however, the risk of uterine rupture remains high and the best technique to reduce this risk is still not known. More studies are needed to formulate the best surgical approach for preserving fertility in treating adenomyosis and to establish standardized guidelines.

Microwave ablation for diffuse adenomyosis leading to multiple complications after hysterectomy: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Hysterectomy after microwave ablation (MWA) is more difficult than conventional surgery which increases the probability of postoperative complications due to MWA's collateral thermal damage to nearby intestines. Here we report a case of multiple postoperative complications after hysterectomy following MWA.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 44-year-old female was admitted due to progressive abdominal pain during menstruation for 30 years and no relief 1 year after MWA. Hysterectomy was performed. Intraoperative findings: pelvic inflammatory exudation; the uterus and the left adnexa were extensively and densely adhered to the intestine, bladder, pelvic wall and surrounding tissues; the local tissue of the uterus was brittle and dark yellow. Intestinal obstruction, abdominal infection and urinary fistula occurred after hysterectomy.

DIAGNOSES

1. Adenomyosis. 2. Endometrial polyps. 3. Left chocolate cyst of ovary. 4. Pelvic adhesions. 5. Pelvic inflammation.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent intestinal obstruction catheter implantation, ultrasound-guided pelvic fluid mass puncture drainage, right kidney puncture and fistula drainage, right ureteral bladder replantation, and right ureteral stent implantation.

OUTCOMES

After 48 days of comprehensive treatment, the patient was cured and discharged.

LESSONS

Microwave ablation has a poor therapeutic effect on diffuse adenomyosis, and should avoid excessive ablation during the ablation process.

Treatment of adenomyosis, abdominal wall endometriosis and uterine leiomyoma with interventional radiology: A review of current evidences

Interventional radiology shows promises in the field of women's health, particularly in pelvic interventions. This review article discusses the latest advancements in interventional radiology techniques for pelvic conditions affecting women including adenomyosis, abdominal wall endometriosis and uterine leiomyoma. Extraperitoneal endometriosis involving the abdominal wall may be treated by percutaneous thermal ablation, such as cryoablation, whereas uterine leiomyoma and adenomyosis can be managed either using percutaneous thermal ablation or using uterine artery embolization. Continued research and development in interventional radiology will further enhance the minimally-invasive interventions available for women's health, improving outcomes and quality of life for this large patient population of women.

Effects of different treatment methods on clinical efficacy and fertility outcomes of patients with adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

This trial was to investigate the effect of different treatment methods on the clinical efficacy and fertility outcome of patients with adenomyosis.

METHODS

In total, 140 patients with adenomyosis were evenly and randomly allocated into group A (laparoscopic surgery), group B (laparoscopic surgery combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs [GnRH-a]), group C (ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation), and group D (ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation combined with GnRH-a). On the 3rd day after surgery, patients in group B and group D were subcutaneously injected with GnRH-a (Leuprorelin Acetate SR for Injection) at 3.75 mg/time, once every 4 weeks, for a total of 3 months. The therapeutic effects of the 4 groups were compared, including menstrual volume, dysmenorrhea score, uterine volume, clinical efficacy, luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, CA125 levels, recurrence, pregnancy status, and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

After treatment, the menstrual volume of 4 groups was lowered, dysmenorrhea, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, LH, FSH, E2, and CA125 levels were reduced, and uterine volume was decreased. The menstrual volume, VAS score, levels of LH, FSH, E2, and CA125, and uterine volume were reduced in groups B, C, and D compared with group A, and the decrease was more significant in group D. The total effective rate of group D was 100.00%, which was higher than that of group A (71.43%), group B (80.00%), and group C (82.86%). After one year of drug withdrawal, the recurrence of hypermenorrhea, dysmenorrhea, uterine enlargement, and excessive CA125 in group D was significantly lower than that in groups A, B and C, and the recurrence in groups B and C was significantly lower than that in group A (P < 0.05). Compared with groups A, B, and C, group D had a higher pregnancy rate, natural pregnancy rate, and lower in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer rate (P < 0.05), but showed no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation combined with Leuprorelin Acetate is effective in the treatment of adenomyosis, which can effectively relieve clinical symptoms, protect postoperative ovarian function, reduce recurrence rate, alleviate pain, and improve quality of life.

Effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on patients with adenomyosis

It is very important to treat adenomyosis which may cause infertility, menorrhagia, and dysmenorrhea for women at the reproductive age. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is effective in destroying target tumor tissues without damaging the path of the ultrasound beam and surrounding normal tissues. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LN-IUS) is a medical system which is inserted into the uterine to provide medicinal treatment for temporary control of the symptoms caused by adenomyosis. This study was to investigate the effect of HIFU combined with the LN-IUS on adenomyosis. In the HIFU treatment, the parameters of the ultrasound were transmission frequency 0.8 MHz and input power 50-400 W (350 ± 30), and the temperature in the target tissue under these conditions would reach 60-100 °C (85 °C ± 6.3 °C). Size reduction and blood flow signal decrease were used to assess the effect of combined treatment. In this study, 131 patients with adenomyosis treated with HIFU combined with LN-IUS were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical and follow-up data were analyzed. After treatment, the volume of the uterine lesion was significantly decreased with an effective rate of 72.1%, and the adenomyosis blood flow signals were significantly reduced, with an effective rate of 71.3%. At six months, the menstrual cycle was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased from 31.4 ± 3.5 days before treatment to 28.6 ± 1.9 days, the menstrual period was significantly shortened from 7.9 ± 1.2 days before HIFU to 6.5 ± 1.3 days, and the menstrual volume was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased from 100 to 49% ± 13%. The serum hemoglobin significantly (P < 0.05) increased from 90.8 ± 6.2 g/L before treatment to 121.6 ± 10.8 g/L at six months for patients with anemia. Among seventy-two (92.3%) patients who finished the six-month follow-up, sixty-five (90.3%) patients had the dysmenorrhea completely relieved, and the other seven (9.7%) patients had only slight dysmenorrhea which did not affect their daily life. Adverse events occurred in 24 (18.3%) patients without causing severe consequences, including skin burns in two (1.5%) patients, skin swelling in four (3.1%), mild lower abdominal pain and low fever in 15 (11.5%), and subcutaneous induration in three (2.3%). Six months after treatment, no other serious side effects occurred in any patients with follow-up. In conclusions, the use of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for the treatment of adenomyosis is safe and effective even though the long-term effect remains to be confirmed.

Transcervical Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Adenomyosis: A Case Report

Transcervical, ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation with the Sonata System was performed on a patient with symptomatic localized adenomyosis. Six-month postoperative follow-up demonstrated subjective improvement of heavy and painful menstrual bleeding and objective decreases in the volume of the adenomyosis lesion (66.3%) and the uterine corpus (40.8%) as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. This is the first known case of successful use of the Sonata System for treating adenomyosis.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Adenomyosis

Adenomyosis is a common benign gynecologic condition characterized by ectopic endometrial glands and stroma in the myometrium causing pain (dysmenorrhea) and abnormal uterine bleeding. New interventional techniques have been introduced over recent years. This study evaluates the treatment success and side effects of radiofrequency ablation. An electronic literature search in the PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases was carried out on the outcomes of pain reduction and, secondarily, on abnormal uterine bleeding, reintervention, reproductive outcome, imaging outcome, and complications. There was a mean decrease in dysmenorrhea pain scores by -63.4 ± 9.0% at 12 months. Data on other outcome parameters were sparse. No major complications were reported. Radiofrequency ablation represents a promising minimally invasive and organ-preserving treatment in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis. It is associated with clinically meaningful improvement of adenomyosis-related pain in the short term.

Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing treatment options for symptomatic adenomyosis, including adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and image-guided thermal ablation.

DATA SOURCES

We searched electronic databases such as Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2022. The search was conducted using the following search terms: "adenomyosis," "recurrence," "reintervention," "relapse," and "recur."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

All studies that described the risk of recurrence or reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis were reviewed and screened according to the eligibility criteria. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of symptoms (painful menses or heavy menstrual bleeding) after significant or complete remission, or the reappearance of adenomyotic lesions confirmed by ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The outcome measures were presented as the frequency with percentage and pooled with 95% CI. A total of 42 studies (single-arm retrospective and prospective studies) that represented 5,877 patients were included. The recurrence rates after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation were 12.6% (95% CI 8.9-16.4%), 29.5% (95% CI 17.4-41.5%), and 10.0% (95% CI 5.6-14.4%), respectively. The reintervention rates were 2.6% (95% CI 0.9-4.3%), 12.8% (95% CI 7.2-18.4%), and 8.2% (95% CI 4.6-11.9%) after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation, respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed, and the heterogeneity was reduced in several analyses.

CONCLUSION

Uterine-sparing techniques were successful in treating adenomyosis with low reintervention rates. Uterine artery embolization had higher recurrence and reintervention rates than other techniques; however, patients treated with UAE had larger uteri and larger adenomyosis, indicating that selection bias may influence these results. More randomized controlled trials with a larger population are needed in the future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021261289.

Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for symptomatic adenomyosis: More areas of concern for more uniform and promising outcomes

Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disease in reproductive women, which causes serious dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, anemia, and infertility, and has a serious impact on the physical and mental health of women. Considering that the efficacy of the traditional medication and surgical treatment is not ideal, an increasing number of patients are searching for more effective and less invasive therapies. Ultrasound (US)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a new effective and minimally invasive alternative treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis, and it is widely being used in clinical settings. Several studies have proven that it is an efficient and safe treatment modality for symptomatic adenomyosis, but a significant variance in clinical outcomes reported in previous studies was also observed. Herein, we have analyzed the potential causes of this problem from the aspects of the diagnosis of adenomyosis, symptom evaluation before ablation, steps of US-guided ablation treatment, and outcome evaluation after ablation. Simultaneously, the clinical problems existing in the ablation treatment of adenomyosis are discussed, and the directions of future research are pointed out.

Current and Prospective Treatment of Adenomyosis

(1) Background: Adenomyosis is a poorly understood entity which makes it difficult to standardize treatment. In this paper we review and compare the currently approved medical and surgical treatments of adenomyosis and present the evidence behind them. (2) Methods: A PubMed search was conducted to identify papers related to the different treatments of adenomyosis. The search was limited to the English language. Articles were divided into medical and surgical treatments. (3) Results: Several treatment options have been studied and were found to be effective in the treatment of adenomyosis. (4) Conclusions: Further randomized controlled trials are needed to compare treatment modalities and establish a uniform treatment algorithm for adenomyosis.