Standards of care in cauda equina syndrome

No turning back: a long-term retrospective analysis of urgent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed for suspected cauda equina compression in a tertiary referral centre

AIM

Cauda equina syndrome is a rare but potentially serious condition for which diagnosis is time-critical for the best outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice, but the diagnostic pathway is challenging as availability of 24/7 urgent MRI is mostly limited to tertiary centres. We present a 13-year experience at one such tertiary centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All lumbar spine MRIs performed for suspected cauda equina between 2011 and 2023 were identified retrospectively from trust-wide information technology (IT) systems. Data including time from request to scan acquisition and reporting times were analysed using automated methods with manual validation.

RESULTS

At our institution, there has been a 10-fold increase in demand for MRI to exclude cauda equina compression over the last decade. In recent years, the mean duration from request to MRI acquisition was within the 4-hour national target in approximately 90% of cases, and time from MRI acquisition to first verified report met the 1-hour national target in just over half of cases (51.1% in 2023). In 2023, 90.0% of reports were verified within 4 hours and 77.5 % within 2 hours, satisfying locally defined standards. Since 2012, 377 patients with clinical suspicion of cauda equina syndrome and positive MRI proceeded to spinal surgery within a week. The mean 5.1% operative rate between 2012 and 2023 corresponds well to previous literature.

CONCLUSION

There is a rising demand for urgent MRI to exclude cauda equina compression with consequent logistical and financial considerations required to meet new national guidance on scan acquisition and reporting targets.

Management of a cauda equina syndrome in a 24 years old military person: a case report

Introduction

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare condition that arises due to various underlying conditions and comprises pentad back pain, saddle anesthesia, bowel bladder disorder, sensory and motor dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction.

Case presentations

The authors hereby present a case of CES in a 24 years old military person who was actively involved in exercise and heavy weight lifting. He was received at the emergency department with symptoms of low back pain with bladder and bowel incontinence, diagnosis of CES was made based on history, clinical examination, and radiological assessments. He was treated under expert surveillance. After the initial treatment he was admitted in the ward for almost a month due to intolerable low back pain. However currently he is showing good signs of recovery in 6 months follow-up.

Clinical discussion

Early diagnosis of CES is likely to be beneficial as it helps delay deterioration, prevents further complications and improve the quality of life of patients but the diagnosis of this syndrome is usually delayed due to unavailability of diagnostic facilities in every health care center. So, assessment of this syndrome should be made among patient presenting with suggestive symptoms for timely diagnosis and better outcome.

Conclusion

CES is a surgical emergency requiring early diagnosis and early intervention to prevent further complications.

Patients returning to the emergency department with symptoms of cauda equina syndrome: do the symptoms differ with radiological cauda equina compression?

BACKGROUND

The guidance for clinicians on who requires further investigation when suspecting cauda equina syndrome has become clearer in England following the publication of the national recommendations. This does not have specific advice for those patients who have had recent imaging with no compression, returning to a healthcare provider with a change in symptoms. These cases can cause difficulty for clinicians with limited access to imaging who can often be reassured by previous imaging.

METHOD

This study presents a retrospective review of the case notes of 45 patients presenting on two occasions to the same Emergency Department who underwent magnetic resonance imaging due to the clinical diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome. Those with compression of the cauda equina on the second visit were compared to those without a compressive cause for their symptoms.

RESULTS

Patients presenting with an increased number of clinical symptoms associated with cauda equina syndrome on their return visit were more likely to have compression of the cauda equina on imaging.

CONCLUSION

The small numbers in this study would suggest caution, however, if patients present with an increasing number of symptoms further imaging should be considered, even with previous reassuring scans.

A prospective review of Cauda Equina Syndrome referrals received by an on-call orthopaedic department at a major trauma unit

INTRODUCTION

Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is one of the genuine orthopaedic emergencies. Diagnosis of acute CES is challenging and may be missed, resulting in considerable medicolegal claims. In Ireland, nearly €21 million in compensation has been paid out over a 10-year period due to the diagnosis being missed. As a result, defensive practices have resulted in an increased number of referrals for CES to the on-call orthopaedic service in a major trauma unit.

METHODS

A prospective data-capturing exercise was carried out of all referrals for acute CES to the orthopaedic on-call department in a tertiary-level university-affiliated teaching hospital between August and November 2023. Qualitative data was captured including referral source, referring clinician grade, in-hours or out-of-hours referral, MRI on referral, red flags as identified by the referring team, red flags as identified by the orthopaedic team, and outcome.

RESULTS

Forty referrals for CES were made over the duration of this audit. Seventeen (42.5%) referrals were made in-hours, and 23 (57.5%) were referred out-of-hours. Only five (12.5%) of these referrals had an MRI done at the time of the referral. No patients were transferred for an out-of-hours MRI to another hospital. Only five (12.5%) patients required surgical decompression-none of these patients required an out-of-hours emergent decompression.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of understanding as to what exactly is being referred-resulting in a referral volume which is over ten times the expected number of CES cases being made to our unit. The lack of out-of-hours MRI access poses a significant concern for patient outcomes.

Cauda equina, conus medullaris and syndromes mimicking sciatic pain: WFNS spine committee recommendations

Introduction

Cauda equina syndrome (CES), conus medullaris syndrome (CMS), and sciatica-like syndromes or "sciatica mimics" (SM) may present as diagnostic and/or therapeutic dilemmas for the practicing spine surgeon. There is considerable controversy regarding the appropriate definition and diagnosis of these entities, as well as indications for and timing of surgery. Our goal is to formulate the most current, evidence-based recommendations for the definition, diagnosis, and management of CES, CMS, and SM syndromes.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed from 2012 to 2022 using the keywords "cauda equina syndrome", "conus medullaris syndrome", "sciatica", and "sciatica mimics". Standardized screening criteria yielded a total of 43 manuscripts, whose data was summarized and presented at two international consensus meetings of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee. Utilizing the Delphi method, we generated seven final consensus statements.

Results and conclusion

s: We provide standardized definitions of cauda equina, cauda equina syndrome, conus medullaris, and conus medullaris syndrome. We advocate for the use of the Lavy et al classification system to categorize different types of CES, and recommend urgent MRI in all patients with suspected CES (CESS), considering the low sensitivity of clinical examination in excluding CES. Surgical decompression for CES and CMS is recommended within 48 h, preferably within less than 24 h. There is no data regarding the role of steroids in acute CES or CMS. The treating physician should be cognizant of a variety of other pathologies that may mimic sciatica, including piriformis syndrome, and how to manage these.

Cauda equina syndrome from intradural metastasis of a non-neural tumor: case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a challenging condition and it can be caused by variable entities. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a multifocal seeding of the leptomeninges by malignant cells and it is observed in 1-8% of patients with solid tumors. Diagnosis of intradural metastases of the cauda equina is often delayed due to the non-specific characteristics of this condition but also to the delay of presentation of many patients. Cauda equina metastases usually occur in advanced cancers, but rarely can be the first presentation of disease.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 63-year-old man presented with 6 months history of low back pain and 20 d history of bilateral sciatica, hypoesthesia of the legs and the saddle, flaccid paraparesis and bowel incontinence determine by multiple nodular small lesions on the entire cauda equina with contrast-enhancement. Total-body CT showed a millimetric lesion at the lung. The patient underwent L2-L5 laminectomy and subtotal removal and histological examination showed a small cell lung carcinoma metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

In the literature, 54 cases of CES from non-CNS tumor metastasis are described. The diagnosis is challenging, back pain, with or without irradiation to the lower limbs, is the most frequently reported disturbance. In about 30% of patients there is no known malignancy and CES is the first clinical presentation. Treatment of choice is surgery, followed by radiotherapy and less frequently adjuvant chemotherapy. The surgical removal is almost always incomplete and functional outcome is often not satisfactory. Prognosis is poor.

A comparison of the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in treating cauda equina syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) in treating cauda equina syndrome (CES).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted, searching relevant databases for studies investigating MIS and/or OS in treating CES. Pooled outcomes and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were meta-analyzed via random-effects models.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled mean operation times were shorter for MIS (75.4 min; 95 %CI: 40.8, 110.0) than OS (155.1 min; 121.3, 188.9). Similarly, mean hospital stay was shorter for MIS (4.08 days; 2.77, 5.39 vs. 8.85 days; 6.56, 11.13). Mean blood loss was smaller for MIS (71.7 mL; 0, 154.5 vs. 366.5; 119.1, 614.0). Mean post-op lumbar/back visual analogue scale (VAS) score was lower for MIS (3.65; 2.75, 4.56 vs. 5.80; 4.55, 7.05). Mean post-op leg VAS score was 1.27 (0.41, 21.4) for MIS and 1.29 (0.47, 2.12) for OS. Mean complete bladder recovery rate was 81.0% (55.0%, 94.0%) for MIS and 75.0% (44.0%, 92.0%) for OS. Mean complete motor recovery rate was larger for MIS (70.0%; 48.0, 85.0 vs. 42.0%; 34.0, 51.0). Mean percentages of "excellent" patient outcomes were equal for MIS (64.0%; 48.0%, 77.0%) and OS (64.0%; 22.0%, 92.0%).

CONCLUSION

MIS for CES was associated with reduced operative time, length of stay, and blood loss, compared to OS. MIS was also associated with better post-operative lumbar/back and leg VAS scores and complete motor and bladder recovery rates. MIS and OS produced an equal average percentage of "excellent" patient outcomes.

Early experience of a local pathway on the waiting time for MRI in patients presenting to a UK district general hospital with suspected cauda equina syndrome

AIM

This study evaluated the impact of the Salisbury Protocol for Assessment of Cauda Equina Syndrome (SPACES) on the waiting time for MRI in patients presenting with suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome (sCES) within a UK district general hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing an MRI scan in our hospital, for sCES, over a 12 month period, prior to and following the introduction of SPACES, were identified. Patient's gender, age, MRI diagnosis, time from MRI request to imaging and outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

In the year prior to the introduction of SPACES, 66 patients underwent MRI for sCES, out of which 10.6% had cauda equina compression (CEC), 63.5% had other spinal pathology and 25% had a normal scan. In the year after introduction of SPACES, 160 patients underwent MRI for sCES out of which 6.2% had CEC, 70.7% had other spinal pathology and 23% had a normal scan. Despite the referrals for sCES increasing by more than 2-fold following the introduction of SPACES, the median time from MRI request to scan decreased from 9.1 to 4.2 hours (p = 0.106, Mann-Whitney-U) and the number of patients transferred to the regional hub hospital decreased from 7 to 3.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of SPACES for patients with sCES resulted in a substantial reduction in waiting time for MRI and decreased the number of transfers to the regional hub hospital. Based on our early experience, we encourage other centres within the UK to introduce such a pathway locally, to improve the management of patients with sCES.

Major complications of caudal block: A prospective survey of 973 cases in adult anorectal surgery

Background

We conducted a prospective study of surgical inpatients at a teaching hospital to assess the incidence and potential risk factors for major complications of caudal anesthesia in anorectal surgery.

Methods

A total of 973 patients undergoing anorectal surgery under caudal block were included in this prospective, observer-blinded trial after providing consent. Demographic information, detailed perioperative information, anesthesia-related complications and postoperative follow-up information were recorded. Meanwhile, the incidence and risk factors for major caudal anesthesia-related complications were analyzed.

Results

A total of 973 patients underwent caudal block. The effective rate was 95.38 % (928 cases). However, there were still 38 (3.91 %) cases with insufficient block and 7 (0.72 %) cases with no block. The major anesthesia-related complications were local anesthetic systemic toxicity (9, 0.92 %), cauda equine syndrome (1, 0.10 %), transient neurological symptoms (3, 0.31 %) and localized pain at the caudal insertion site (30, 3.08 %). The identified risk factor for local anesthetic systemic toxicity was multiple attempts locating the caudal space (OR = 5.30; 1.21-23.29). The identified risk factor for localized pain at the caudal insertion site was multiple attempts locating the caudal space (OR = 10.57; 4.89-22.86).

Conclusion

The main complications of caudal block in adult patients are transient neurological symptoms, cauda equine syndrome, serious local anesthetic systemic toxicity and localized pain at the caudal insertion site. Overall, the incidence of complications is low and symptoms are mild. Caudal block is still a safe and reliable method for anesthesia in adult anorectal surgery.

Publication Trends and Hot Spots in Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Current Research

BACKGROUND

Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a relatively uncommon and complex disorder. Recently, there has been a surge in research on CES. Although the research directions are multifarious, the overall research trends are unclear at present. We aimed to identify the 100 most cited articles on CES and analyze the hot spots trends regarding CES related research by bibliometric analysis.

METHODS

Articles were obtained by conducting an English language search of the Web of Science Core Collection Databases with the keywords "cauda equina syndrome." The initial 390 articles returned from the search were analyzed by VOSviewer. Next, the top 100 most cited articles were further analyzed by title, authors, journal, year of publication, total citations, country of origin, institution, and keywords.

RESULTS

A total of 390 publications were identified. The top 100 most cited articles were listed in descending order of total citations (range: 196-11). These articles originated from 24 countries; among these countries, the United Kingdom contributed the most publications (n = 29). The most prolific journal was Spine (n = 27), and the University of Edinburgh was the most productive institution (n = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of publications on CES increased steadily, with a stable rise in recent years. Some publications have been cited more than 100 times, indicating that these findings are widely accepted by relevant clinicians and contribute significantly to the knowledge of CES. This study represents the first bibliometric analysis and visualization of hot spots analysis and research trends on CES. We believe that this will aid clinical researchers in targeting future areas of research.

Lumbar decompression surgery for cauda equina syndrome - comparison of complication rates between daytime and overnight operating

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence of complications from lumbar decompression ± discectomy surgery for cauda equina syndrome (CES), assessing whether time of day is associated with a change in the incidence of complications.

METHODS

Electronic clinical and operative notes for all lumbar decompression operations undertaken at our institution for CES over a 2-year time period were retrospectively reviewed. "Overnight" surgery was defined as any surgery occurring between 18:00 and 08:00 on any day. Clinicopathological characteristics, surgical technique, and peri/post-operative complications were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 81 lumbar decompression operations were performed in the 2-year period and analysed. A total of 29 (36%) operations occurred overnight. Complete CES (CESR) was seen in 13 cases (16%) in total, 7 of whom underwent surgery during the day. Exactly 27 complications occurred in 24 (30%) patients. The most frequently occurring complication was a dural tear (n = 21, 26%), followed by post-operative haematoma, infection, and residual disc. Complication rates in the CESR cohort (54%) were significantly greater than in the CES incomplete (CESI) cohort (25%) (p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, overnight surgery was independently associated with a significantly increased complication rate (OR 2.83, CI 1.02-7.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar decompressions performed overnight for CES were more than twice as likely to suffer a complication, in comparison to those performed within daytime hours. Our study suggests that out-of-hours operating, particularly at night, must be clinically justified and should not be influenced by day-time operating capacity.

Can digital rectal examination be used to detect cauda equina compression in people presenting with acute cauda equina syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

BACKGROUND

Digital rectal examination (DRE) is a commonly used test to help identify people with cauda equina compression (CEC).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of DRE in assessment of anal tone, squeeze, sensation and reflexes, as predictors of CEC.

DESIGN

A systematic review to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of DRE to detect CEC compared with lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

METHOD

Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 6 July 2020 for studies published in English. Two assessors independently performed screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment (QUADAS-2). Meta-analysis was performed using STATA-16.

RESULTS

Six studies were included (n = 741). The sensitivity of anal tone was low across all studies (range: 0.23 to 0.53) with moderate quality evidence against the use of DRE of anal tone. One study on anal sensation found no correlation with CEC using Kendall's tau test: p = 0.102 and another found sensation had low test accuracy. One study identified sensitivity: 0.29 and specificity: 0.96 for anal squeeze, while another identified sensitivity: 0.38 and specificity: 0.6 for anal reflexes.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of DRE of anal tone to detect CEC is low and carries a high risk of false reassurance. It is therefore not recommended in any clinical setting. More research is needed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of DRE of anal squeeze, sensation and reflexes and if done the results should be interpreted with caution.

Physical Examination Is Predictive of Cauda Equina Syndrome: MRI to Rule Out Diagnosis Is Unnecessary

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a neurologic emergency, and delay in diagnosis can result in irreversible impairment. Our purpose was to determine the value of physical examination in diagnosis of CES in patients complaining of bladder and/or bowel complications in the emergency department.

METHODS

Adult patients at one tertiary academic medical center that endorsed bowel/bladder dysfunction, underwent a lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and received an orthopedic spine surgery consultation from 2008 to 2017 were included. Patients consulted for trauma or tumor were excluded. A chart and imaging review was performed to collect demographic, physical examination, and treatment data. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated, and fast-and-frugal decision trees (FFTs) were generated using R.

RESULTS

Of 142 eligible patients, 10 were diagnosed with CES. The sensitivity and specificity of the exam findings were highest for bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) (100% and 100%), followed by rectal tone (80% and 86%), postvoid residual bladder (80% and 59%), and perianal sensation (60% and 68%). The positive predictive value was high for BCR (100%), but low for other findings (13% to 31%). However, negative predictive values were consistently high for all examinations (96% to 100%). Two FFTs utilizing combinations of voluntary rectal tone, perianal sensation, and BCR resulted in no false negatives.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of physical examination findings of lower sacral function is an effective means of ruling out CES and, with further study, may eliminate the need for MRI in many patients reporting back pain and bowel or bladder dysfunction.

Cauda Equina Syndrome: Poor Recovery Prognosis Despite Early Treatment

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective patient's database operated on a cauda equina syndrome (CES).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to identify prognosis factors for favorable functional recovery after CES.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CES is a neurologic impairment of variable symptoms associating urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunctions with or without motor or sensitive deficits caused by nerve root compression of the cauda equina. The definition of CES remains debated, as well as the prognosis factors for favorable functional recovery and the benefit of early surgery.

METHODS

One hundred forty patients were included between January 2010 and 2019. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard regression models were conducted.

RESULTS

The patients were young with a median age of 46.8 years (range 18-86 yrs). At presentation, 60% were affected by a motor deficit, 42.8% a sensitive deficit, 70% urinary dysfunctions, and 44% bowel dysfunctions. The mean follow-up was 15.5 months. Bilateral motor deficit (P = 0.017) and an initial deficit severity of 0 to 2 (P = 0.001) represented prognosis factors of poor motor recovery. Initial anal incontinence (P = 0.007) was associated with poor bowel recovery. Only 32.8% of the patients went back to work. Initial motor deficit (P = 0.015), motor sequelae (P = 0.001), sphincter dysfunctions sequelae (P = 0.02), and long LOS (P = 0.02) were poor return-to-work prognosis factors. Time to surgery within an early timing < 24 or 48 hours or later did not represent a prognosis factor of recovery in CES. Incomplete versus complete CES did not show better recovery.

CONCLUSION

CES remains a profound disabling syndrome with poor functional prognosis: in the long run, few patients go back to work. The main prognosis factors established in our series regarded the initial severity of deficits whether motor or sphincteral. Early or later surgical cauda equina decompression did not show to represent a prognosis factor for functional recovery.Level of Evidence: 4.

Evaluation and Management of Cauda Equina Syndrome

Cauda equina syndrome is a potentially devastating spinal condition. The diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome lacks sensitivity and specificity, sometimes occurring after irreparable neurological damage has happened. Timely diagnosis and treatment is imperative for optimal outcomes and for avoiding medicolegal ramifications. Cauda equina syndrome results from conditions that compress the nerves in the lumbosacral spinal canal. Although no consensus definition exists, it generally presents with varying degrees of sensory loss, motor weakness, and bowel and bladder dysfunction (the latter of which is required to definitively establish the diagnosis). A thorough history and physical exam is imperative, followed by magnetic resonance or computed tomography imaging myelogram to aid in diagnosis and treatment. Once suspected, emergent spinal surgery referral is indicated, along with urgent decompression. Even with expeditious surgery, improvements remain inconsistent. However, early intervention has been shown to portend greater chance of neurologic recovery. All providers in clinical practice must understand the severity of this condition. Providers can optimize long-term patient outcomes and minimize the risk of litigation by open communication, good clinical practice, thorough documentation, and expeditious care.

Determination of potential risk characteristics for cauda equina compression in emergency department patients presenting with atraumatic back pain: a 4-year retrospective cohort analysis within a tertiary referral neurosciences centre

OBJECTIVE

Atraumatic back pain is an increasingly common presentation to the ED. A minority of these cases will have significant structural pathology, resulting in acute cauda equina compression (CEC). Although clinicians often look for 'red flags' to identify potential CEC, the prognostic accuracy of these presenting symptoms and clinical examination findings is unclear. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of individual clinical features in a large cohort of ED patients with atraumatic backpain and reference standard imaging, for the diagnosis of CEC.

METHODS

A retrospective case note review from 2014 to 2018 within an established ED atraumatic back pain pathway, undertaken at the largest tertiary spinal referral centre in the UK. We analysed routine data, collected prospectively by treating clinicians within a structured electronic health record clinical proforma. Data on signs and symptoms in 996 patients with suspected CEC referred for definitive MRI over a 4-year study period were extracted and compared against a final reference standard diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 111 patients with radiological evidence of CEC within the cohort referred for definitive imaging (111/996, 11.1%), of whom 109 (98.2%) underwent operative intervention. Patients with CEC were more likely to present with bilateral leg pain (OR=2.2), dermatomal sensory loss (OR 1.8) and bilateral absent ankle or ankle and knee jerks (OR=2.9). Subjective weakness was found to be associated with CEC on univariate but not multivariate analysis. We found no relationship between digital rectal examination findings and the diagnosis of CEC.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, factors independently associated with CEC diagnosis on MRI included bilateral leg pain, dermatomal sensory loss. Loss of lower limb reflexes was strongly suggestive of CES (likelihood ratio 3.4 on multivariate logistic regression). Our findings raise questions about the diagnostic utility of invasive digital rectal examination.

Priapism, a symptom of claudication of the cauda equina in spinal stenosis

Priapism is defined as a persistent penile erection in the absence of sexual arousal. This symptom has been documented in patients with spinal stenosis although it is considered a rare finding. The European Association of Urology guidelines on priapism [Salonia et al., 2014] list cauda equina syndrome and spinal stenosis as causative factors for ischemic priapism although the literature describing this phenomenon appears sparse. Priapism can be a rare symptom of lumbar spine stenosis/transient cauda equina compression. This presentation is complex and believed to be a parasympathetic mediated autonomic disorder. This article discusses the relationship between spinal stenosis, cauda equina syndrome and priapism using available literature. Greater awareness of this clinical finding may help clinicians in their clinical decision making. In patients with suspected cauda equina syndrome, subjective enquiry regarding the symptom priapism may add to the patients overall clinical picture.

Patient-Reported Bladder, Bowel, and Sexual Function After Cauda Equina Syndrome Secondary to a Herniated Lumbar Intervertebral Disc

BACKGROUND

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is rare neurosurgical emergency requiring emergent surgical decompression to prevent bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction that can have significant impact on quality of life. There is a paucity of data relating to the prevalence of these long-term complications.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the long-term prevalence of CES-related bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction and impact on quality of life to inform service provision.

METHODS

Participants were selected through coding of operative records of patients who underwent lumbar decompression for CES secondary to a herniated intervertebral disc at two large UK neurosurgical departments between 2011 and 2015 inclusive. A telephone-based survey including both validated and modified tools was used to collect data pertaining to bladder, bowel, and sexual function and impact on quality of life both before development of CES and at the time of the survey, at least 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of 135 patients contacted, 71 (42 male, 29 female) responded. Post-CES compared to pre-CES, there was higher prevalence and significant intrarespondent deterioration of bowel dysfunction, bladder dysfunction, perception of bladder function, sexual function, effect of back pain on sex life, and activities of daily living/quality of life (p < .0001 for all). Significant differences in individual questions pre-CES versus post-CES were also found.

CONCLUSION

We show high prevalence of long-term bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction post-CES, with functional and psychosocial consequences. Our results demonstrate the need for preoperative information and subsequent screening and long-term multidisciplinary support for these complications.

Factors affecting urinary outcome after delayed decompression in complete cauda equina syndrome: "A regression model study"

PURPOSE

To evaluate the recovery of urinary functions and the factors predicting urinary recovery, following delayed decompression in complete cauda equina syndrome (CESR) secondary to Lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

Retrospective study evaluated 19 cases of CESR due to single-level LDH, all presenting beyond 72 h. Mean delay in decompression was 11.16 ± 7.59 days and follow-up of 31.71 ± 13.90 months. Urinary outcomes were analysed on two scales, a 4-tier ordinal and a dichotomous scale. Logistic regression analysis was used for various predictors including delay in decompression, age, sex, radiation, level of LDH, motor deficits, type and severity of presentation. Time taken to full recovery was correlated with a delay in decompression. using Spearman-correlation.

RESULTS

Optimal recovery was seen in 73.7% patients and time to full recovery was moderately correlated with a delay in decompression (r = 0.580, p = 0.030). For those with optimal bladder recovery, mean recovery time was 7.43 ± 5.33 months. Time to decompression and other evaluated factors were not found contributory to urinary outcomes on either scales. Three (15.8%) patients had excellent, 11 (57.9%) had good, while 3 (15.8%) and 2 (10.5%) had fair and poor outcomes respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Occurrence of CESR is not a point of no-return and complete recovery of urinary functions occur even after delayed decompression. Longer delay leads to slower recovery but it is not associated with the extent of recovery. Since time to decompression is positively correlated with time to full recovery, early surgery is still advised in the next available optimal operative setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A service evaluation of patients suspected of Cauda Equina Syndrome referred to accident and emergency departments from a national telephone triage service

BACKGROUND

The presentation and management of Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) remains contentious in medical literature, however it is widely agreed that CES requires emergency medical attention. Physiotherapists will often refer suspected cases to A&E departments for emergency medical review in order to safeguard patient safety.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the management of patients triaged by a national telephone service referred to A&E for suspected CES.

METHOD

Known escalations (17 cases) from January 2017 to June 2017 from a national telephone triage service referred to A&E with suspected CES were included.

RESULTS

53% of cases with CES symptoms that conformed to the BASS definition of having a requirement for diagnostic imaging were not investigated by MRI scan. The MRI and non-MRI groups had similar group sizes (8 : 9) and mean ages (42.4 years ± 8SD and 45.7 years ± 12SD). Overall, there were more females (11) compared to males (6) referred to A&E.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be significant variability in the management of this cohort of patients once referred to emergency departments. Further guidance is needed as to when watchful waiting is clinically appropriate, and what best practice should be to facilitate safe patient management.

Scan-Negative Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To describe clinical features relevant to diagnosis, mechanism, and etiology in patients with "scan-negative" cauda equina syndrome (CES).

METHODS

We carried out a prospective study of consecutive patients presenting with the clinical features of CES to a regional neurosurgery center comprising semi-structured interview and questionnaires investigating presenting symptoms, neurologic examination, psychiatric and functional disorder comorbidity, bladder/bowel/sexual function, distress, and disability.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients presented consecutively over 28 months. A total of 47 were diagnosed with scan-positive CES (mean age 48 years, 43% female). A total of 76 mixed category patients had nerve root compression/displacement without CES compression (mean age 46 years, 71% female) and 61 patients had scan-negative CES (mean age 40 years, 77% female). An alternative neurologic cause of CES emerged in 14/198 patients during admission and 4/151 patients with mean duration 25 months follow-up. Patients with scan-negative CES had more positive clinical signs of a functional neurologic disorder (11% scan-positive CES vs 34% mixed and 68% scan-negative, p < 0.0001), were more likely to describe their current back pain as worst ever (41% vs 46% and 70%, p = 0.005), and were more likely to have symptoms of a panic attack at onset (37% vs 57% and 70%, p = 0.001). Patients with scan-positive CES were more likely to have reduced/absent bilateral ankle jerks (78% vs 30% and 12%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between groups in the frequency of reduced anal tone and urinary retention.

CONCLUSION

The first well-phenotyped, prospective study of scan-negative CES supports a model in which acute pain, medication, and mechanisms overlapping with functional neurologic disorders may be relevant.

Physiotherapists' experiences of managing persons with suspected cauda equina syndrome: Overcoming the challenges

INTRODUCTION

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is rare, but its symptoms are not and musculoskeletal physiotherapists frequently encounter persons with suspected CES. Given that delayed diagnosis of CES can result in devastating consequences for affected persons and costly litigation for healthcare organisations, it is imperative that persons presenting with suspected CES are well managed. However, this may present a challenge to physiotherapists. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore physiotherapists' experiences of managing persons with suspected CES.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with musculoskeletal physiotherapists. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using an interpretive paradigm and thematic analysis.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

Ethical approval was obtained from a university Ethics committee and NHS Research and Development.

FINDINGS

Five interlinking themes emerged. The themes of worry in relation to risk management and communication difficulties seemed to represent significant challenges. The remaining themes were described as antidotes to these challenges: Lightening the load with teamwork and shared responsibility, the usefulness of a clear pathway and perception of improved confidence and competence with experience and training.

DISCUSSION

The findings are discussed in the context of other literature, and practical recommendations are made relating to pathway implementation, team working, communication aids, training on CES and measures to care for staff wellbeing.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that it is important to be aware of and address the challenges faced by physiotherapists in order to care for clinicians' wellbeing and ensure a safe and smooth journey for persons with suspected CES. Summary Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIHqCKIQ1jk&t=90s.

30-Day Recurrence, Readmission Rate, and Clinical Outcome After Emergency Lumbar Discectomy

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the 30-day recurrence rate after emergency lumbar discectomy. Secondary aims were to investigate the factors affecting the 30-day recurrence and readmission rates and clinical outcome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Excluding cauda equine syndrome (CES) due to massive intervertebral disc herniation, emergency surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is rarely required. The operation may, however, be performed for other reasons such as persistent or progressive motor paresis associated with radiculopathy or uncontrolled pain. Literature on these topics is scarce.

METHODS

All patients admitted for inpatient care after a visit to the emergency department (ED) due to acute low back pain and who had subsequently undergone an emergency lumbar discectomy during the 4-year study period were included in the study. Patients attending the ED who subsequently had a delayed discectomy formed the control group. Recurrence and readmission rates were analyzed and clinical outcome at 30 days post-surgery was assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog pain scale (VAS).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty patients were admitted to the hospital after visiting the ED and underwent an emergency discectomy after a median of 1.0 days from admittance. Six patients in the study group [4.6% (95% CI: 2.1-9.7)] had recurrent LDH and nine patients in total [6.9% (95% CI: 3.9-12.6)] were readmitted within 30 days. None of the baseline variables clearly predicted recurrence. Mean ODI difference between the study group and controls was 8.1 (95% CI: -6.7-23.2). BMI and surgery by a non-spine surgeon were associated with higher ODI values.

CONCLUSION

An emergency discectomy is associated with a higher rate than expected of both recurrent LDHs and 30-day readmissions. Surgeon experience and patient-related factors had minor effects on the 30-day clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

What is the incidence of cauda equina syndrome? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a surgical emergency requiring timely operative intervention to prevent symptom progression. Accurately establishing the incidence of CES is required to inform healthcare service design and delivery, including out-of-hours imaging arrangements.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus was undertaken to identify original studies stating the incidence of CES, and the estimates were combined in a meta-analysis as described in the protocol registered with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42017065865) and reported using the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 1281 studies were identified, and 26 studies were included in the review. Data about CES incidence were available from 3 different populations: asymptomatic community populations, patients with nontraumatic low-back pain, and patients presenting as an emergency with suspected CES. The incidence of CES was 0.3-0.5 per 100,000 per year in 2 asymptomatic community populations, 0.6 per 100,000 per year in an asymptomatic adult population, and 7 per 100,000 per year in an asymptomatic working-age population. CES occurred in 0.08% of those with low-back pain presenting to primary care in 1 study, and a combined estimate of 0.27% was calculated for 4 studies of those with low-back pain presenting to secondary care. Across 18 studies of adults with suspected CES, 19% had radiological and clinical CES. Difficulties in comparison between studies resulted from the heterogeneous definitions of CES and lack of separation of more advanced CES with retention, which is unlikely to be reversible. In the studies of patients with suspected CES, the small sample size, the high number of single-center studies (18/18), the high number of studies from the United Kingdom (17/18), the retrospective nature of the studies, and the high number of abstracts rather than full texts (9/18) reduced the quality of the data.

CONCLUSIONS

From current studies, it appears that CES occurs infrequently in asymptomatic community populations and in only 19% of those presenting with symptoms. Determining accurate incidence figures and designing a bespoke service for investigation of patients with suspected CES would require a consensus clinical and radiological definition of CES and international multisite studies of patient pathways of investigation and management.

The Cauda Scale - Validation for Clinical Practice

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the cauda scale (TCS) in an external population. TCS was proposed as a tool to be used to predict the likelihood of cauda equina compression.Methods: We analysed the presenting condition of consecutive patients attending the emergency department undergoing a magnetic resonance scan with a clinical suspicion of cauda equina syndrome (CES). The findings were graded according to TCS for those with and without radiological compression of the cauda equina. Logistic regression was applied to the data in accordance with the original paper.Results: Patients were included over a 14 month period (n = 313), subsequent imaging revealed CES compression in 34 cases and no CES compression in 279. The TCS proposed that small values meant a more likely diagnosis of CES, the data showed the opposite of this with the highest number of patients with CES scoring a maximal 9 on TCS (mildest symptoms).Conclusions: Our data suggests that TCS has potential limitations in identifying patients with CES and needs further work prior to implementation.

Retrospective analysis of diagnoses and outcomes of 45 cats with micturition disorders presenting as urinary incontinence

Background

In contrast to dogs, the causes and outcomes of urinary incontinence (UI) in cats are largely unknown.

Objectives

To determine the causes, identify comorbid conditions, and assess outcomes of cats with micturition disorders presenting as UI.

Animals

Forty‐five cats with UI.

Methods

Retrospective study. Medical records of cats presented from January 2006 to December 2017 were searched using 45 keywords related to UI. History, presenting complaint, and physical examination findings were used to confirm a diagnosis. Cases were categorized based on functional and anatomic localizations.

Results

Forty‐five cats met inclusion criteria. Spinal cord disease was the most common cause of UI (n = 18), followed by urethral (n = 17), bladder (n = 9), and ureteral (n = 1) disorders. Proportions of voiding and storage phase disorders were similar (53% and 47%, respectively). However, voiding‐phase disorders were observed more frequently in males and younger‐aged cats (P < .03). Urinary tract infection was detected in 11 of 28 (39%) cats. Outcomes were available in 38/45 cases; 16 cats (42%) regained continence, 3 (8%) improved with treatment, and 19 (50%) remained incontinent or were euthanized. Multiple variable logistic regressions indicated that spinal cord disease was significantly more likely to be associated with poor outcomes compared to bladder or urethral disorders (P < .04).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Urinary incontinence in cats was associated with a variety of congenital and acquired disorders that affected both phases of micturition with similar frequency. Incontinent cats with spinal cord disorders were common and warrant a more guarded prognosis than do cats with bladder or urethral disorders.

Atypical Cauda Equina Syndrome with Lower Limb Clonus: A Literature Review and Case Report

BACKGROUND

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a neurosurgical emergency warranting urgent surgical decompression. Treatment delay may precipitate permanent adverse neurological sequelae. CES is a clinical diagnosis, corroborated by radiological findings. Atypical presentations should be acknowledged to avoid inappropriately rejected diagnoses.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report the case of a woman exhibiting bilateral lower limb weakness, perineal numbness, sphincter disturbance, and lower limb clonus. Classically, CES displays lower motor neuron signs in the lower limbs. The presence of clonus, an upper motor neuron sign, brought the diagnosis into doubt. The history included chronic fatigue, difficulty mobilizing, and intermittent blurred vision. A lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan demonstrated a large disc prolapse at L5/S1. The cord was not low-lying or tethered. Therefore, the possibility of second diagnoses, including of inflammatory or demyelinating nature, was raised. An urgent MRI scan of the brain and cervicothoracic cord identified no other lesions. On balance, the clinical presentation could overwhelmingly be attributed to the L5/S1 disc prolapse. Given the time-critical nature of cauda equina (CE) compression, an urgent laminectomy and discectomy was offered with continued postoperative investigation of the clonus. Intraoperatively, significant CE compression was found. The operation proceeded uneventfully and the patient recovered fully. In the immediate postoperative period, the clonus persisted yet subsequently resolved completely.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the clonus was attributable to CE compression and not a second pathology. The corresponding neuroanatomical correlate remains nondelineated. The presence of clonus does not preclude a diagnosis of CES. If the clinicoradiological information otherwise correlate, surgery should not be delayed while alternative diagnoses are sought. The literature is also reviewed.

Evaluation and management of cauda equina syndrome in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) may be a devastating disease with the potential for significant patient morbidity. It is essential for emergency clinicians to be aware of how to effectively diagnose and manage this condition.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a narrative review of the diagnosis and management of CES for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

Cauda equina syndrome is a rare but emergent condition associated with back pain. It can result in severe morbidity and can be due to a variety of causes, most commonly vertebral disc protrusion. Diagnosis is often delayed, which may result in a poor prognosis. Red flags and findings consistent with CES include bilateral neurogenic sciatica, reduced perineal sensation, altered bladder function leading to painless urinary retention, loss of anal tone, and loss of sexual function. In isolation, history and examination findings demonstrate poor sensitivity. Symptoms may occur either suddenly or gradually, and most patients do not present with all of these symptoms. Postvoid bladder volume assessments can assist in the evaluation, but the diagnosis typically involves magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography myelography if MRI is not available. Treatment relies upon surgical consultation and operative intervention for decompression.

CONCLUSION

Cauda equina syndrome can be a difficult diagnosis. However, knowledge of the history and examination findings, imaging, and treatment can assist the emergency clinician in optimizing management of this condition.

What is the diagnostic accuracy of red flags related to cauda equina syndrome (CES), when compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To review and statistically pool available evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of red flags to clinically identify MRI confirmed Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES).

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, Scopus, Ovid Medline, Ovid Healthstar, Amed and CINAHL from inception to January 30, 2018 and a grey literature search.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Primary diagnostic studies, published in English; comparing red flags for CES; to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as reference standard; in humans; older than 18 years.

METHODS

Data extraction, assessment of study quality using a modified QUADAS-2 tool and the use of GRADE to synthesize the results for each test was performed by three independent assessors. Diagnostic accuracy statistics applied to the identified data andpooled analysis performed using Meta-DiSc, version 1.4. Moderator analyses planned for pooled results.

RESULTS

Seven studies (total N = 569 participants) were included. Potential signs or symptoms of CES were compared to MRI findings. Diagnostic data could be pooled for reduced anal tone, leg pain, back pain, saddle anaesthesia, urinary retention, urinary incontinence and bowel incontinence from six of seven studies. The pooled sensitivity for the signs and symptoms ranged from 0.19 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.33) to 0.43 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.56) while the pooled specificity ranged from 0.62 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.73) to 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Red flags used to identify potential CES appear to be more specific than sensitive. As such, when these are present, they should be considered justification for prompt diagnostic workup.

Cauda equina syndrome due to disk herniation: Long-term functional prognosis

OBJECTIVE

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) caused by lumbar disk extrusion is classically considered an indication of urgent surgery. CES can be subdivided into CESI (incomplete CES) and CESR (complete CES with urinary retention and incontinence). This paper evaluates the long-term functional outcome of a CES cohort operated on due to disk herniation.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective observational study. CES patients due to disk herniation that underwent surgery between 2000 and 2016 were included in the study. Demographic data, time intervals to diagnosis and surgery, preoperative neurologic status and outcome at the end of follow up were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included (median age 44 years). Eight patients were CESR and 14 CESI. Median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 78h (range, 12-720h), and from diagnosis to surgery 24h (range, 5-120h). Median follow up was 75 months (range, 20-195 months). At the end of follow up, in the CESR group (median time from diagnosis to surgery, 23h) only pain significantly improved after surgery (p=0.007). In the CESI group (median time from diagnosis to surgery 23h) low back pain, sciatica and urinary sphincter function significantly improved (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between early (<48h) operation (n=4) and late (n=18) in terms of sphincter recovery (Fisher's Exact Test, p=0.076).

CONCLUSION

Pain associated to CES improved both in the CESI and CESR groups. However, urinary sphincter impairment significantly improved only in the CESI group. No significant differences were found regarding long-term functional outcome between early and late surgery.

Legal and evidenced-based definitions of standard of care: Implications for code of ethics of professional medical societies

Background:

The concept “standard of care” (SOC) is invoked in legal cases, as well as evidence-based, and professional/ethical discussions in medicine and surgery.

Methods:

We reviewed key legal cases and relevant evidence-based medical articles, and then explored the implications for professional societies seeking to set guidelines for their members testifying as expert witnesses.

Results:

First, the legal concept of SOC plays a role in malpractice cases in assessing whether a physician's behavior was “within the SOC.” The concept of SOC has evolved from a “standard of a responsible body of medical opinion” (Bolam case), which implicitly did not allow for multiple SOC, to a more evidence-based approach. Second, according to the evidence-based medical literature, there is more than one SOC in medicine and surgery, including neurosurgery. Third, professional, medical, and surgical societies have evoked the concept of SOC to set ethical guidelines for how their members should behave when testifying as expert witnesses. Specifically, the literature argues societies should avoid abusing singular, self-serving definitions of the SOC to sanction members, typically plaintiff's experts, who offer alternative SOC in depositions or in court.

Conclusions:

Recent legal decisions suggest that testimony should be based upon scientific evidence. The scientific evidence indicates that there is often more than one SOC. Thus, any subspecialty society, including the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, that ignores evidence-based medicine and the existence of multiple SOC, risks the appearance of fostering self-interest at the expense of patient care.

Understanding cauda equina syndrome: protocol for a UK multicentre prospective observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a potentially devastating condition caused by compression of the cauda equina nerve roots. This can result in bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction plus lower limb weakness, numbness and pain. CES occurs infrequently, but has serious potential morbidity and medicolegal consequences. This study aims to identify and describe the presentation and management of patients with CES in the UK.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Understanding Cauda Equina Syndrome (UCES) is a prospective and collaborative multicentre cohort study of adult patients with confirmed CES managed at specialist spinal centres in the UK. Participants will be identified using neurosurgical and orthopaedic trainee networks to screen referrals to spinal centres. Details of presentation, investigations, management and service usage will be recorded. Both patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures will be assessed for 1 year after surgery. This will establish the incidence of CES, current investigation and management practices, and adherence to national standards of care. Outcomes will be stratified by clinical presentation and patient management. Accurate and up to date information about the presentation, management and outcome of patients with CES will inform standards of service design and delivery for this important but infrequent condition.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

UCES received a favourable ethical opinion from the South East Scotland Research Ethics Committee 02 (Reference: 18/SS/0047; IRAS ID: 233515). All spinal centres managing patients with CES in the UK will be encouraged to participate in UCES. Study results will be published in medical journals and shared with local participating sites.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN16828522; Pre-results.

Assessment and management of cauda equina syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare condition that affects the nerves in the spine supplying the bladder, bowel and sexual function. Identification and subsequent urgent action is required to avoid permanent damage to these essential organs. Delays in diagnosis can have devastating and life changing consequences for patients and result in high cost negligence claims.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this masterclass is to examine the current evidence and provide an evidence-based, clinically reasoned approach in the safe management of patients presenting with CES. It will include a focus on the importance of communication, documentation and a practical approach to safety netting those at risk.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

CES has significant implications for patients and clinicians alike. Timely, effective diagnosis and management of patients with CES results in a better outcome.

Outcomes Reported After Surgery for Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review

STUDY DESIGN

This is a systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes reported in trials and observational studies of surgery for cauda equina syndrome (CES), and to inform the development of a core outcome set.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Scoping searches revealed that there were inconsistencies in which outcomes were reported and how they were measured in research studies for patients who had undergone surgery for CES.

METHODS

Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and trial registries were searched from January 1, 1990 to September 30, 2016 with the term "cauda equina syndrome." Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied according to study design, diagnosis, procedure, publication date, language, and patient age. Data extracted included demographics, study design, the outcomes reported, and their definition. We also assessed variation in the use of terminology for each outcome domain.

RESULTS

A total of 1873 articles were identified, of which 61 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 737 outcomes reported verbatim were categorized into 20 core outcome domains and 12 subdomains with a range of 1 to 141 outcomes per outcome domain or subdomain. The most commonly reported outcomes were bladder function (70.5%), motor function (63.9%), and sensation (50.8%). Significant variation in the terms used for each outcome was documented, for example, bladder function outcome domain had 141 different terms.

CONCLUSION

There is significant heterogeneity in outcomes reported for studies after surgery for CES patients. This indicates a clear need for the development of a core outcome set, which has been registered as number 824 on the COMET (Core Outcome Measure in Effectiveness Trials) database.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Quantifying the clinical aspects of the cauda equina syndrome - The Cauda Scale (TCS)

AIM

To quantify the clinical findings in patients with potential cauda equina syndrome (CES).

METHODS

Three domains were selected: bladder function (B), perianal sensation (S) and anal tone/squeeze (T). A quantified score was given to symptoms and signs in each domain.

RESULTS

The lowest score in each domain and the lowest sum score (the most severe lesion) is 0. The best sum score is 9 (the normal patient).

CONCLUSION

TCS can improve the clinical assessment and management of patients with possible CES and improve communication between the doctors who are called upon to assess and treat such patients.

Analysis of clinical and neurological outcomes in patients with cauda equina syndrome caused by acute lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective-prospective study

OBJECTIVES

In this research we analyzed the results of surgical treatment of cauda equina syndrome (CES) caused by acute lumbar disc herniation. We emphasize the early treatment for good neurological recovery.

METHODS

A retrospective-prospective, non randomized, clinical study was performed between Jan 2010 and Dec 2014. We retrospectively collected medical records of 18 patients who suffered from CES due to acute lumbar disc herniation and followed up them regularly. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, lumbar JOA score (29 points), RR (recovery rate) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire were used to evaluate clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for at least two years. Lumbar disc herniation is located at L2-3 level in 2 cases, L3-4 level in 2 cases, L4-5 level in 9 cases, L5-S1 level in 5 cases. VAS score is 6±2.5 preoperatively and 1.5±1.0 postoperatively at last follow-up (P<0.001). JOA score is 5±3.5 preoperatively, while it is 20±7 postoperatively at last follow-up (P<0.001). RR ≥ 50% was found in 12 cases. ODI is 75%±25% preoperatively, while it becomes 28%±16% postoperatively at last follow-up (P<0.001). It also shows that advanced age (≥45 years) may act as a risk factor for poor RR(<50%), while early operation (duration before surgery, <48 h) proves to be a protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Early operations are mandatory and closely relevant to final outcomes for CES patients. However, elder patients are more likely to have poor clinical effect after surgery.

[Delayed decompression for cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: long-term follow-up results]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of delayed decompression on long-term neurological and bladder function recovery in patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) secondary to lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

The clinical data of 35 patients receiving delayed decompression surgery for CES secondary to LDH were reviewed. The bladder empty function, bowel control, sexual ability and neurological functions of the lower limbs were evaluated after the operation, and the urodynamic changes were assessed in 6 patients with urodynamic data before and after the operation.

RESULTS

Surgical decompression was performed at 4.1±3.9 weeks in 12 patients with complete CES and at 5.5±7.6 weeks in 23 patients with incomplete CES after the onset of symptoms. The patients were followed up for a mean of 43.0±28.9 months (3-110 months). In the 23 patients with incomplete CES, 19 obtained full recovery, 4 had slight sensory alterations in the saddle area or the lower limbs. In the 12 patients with complete CES, 2 had full recovery, 4 reported slight sensory alterations in the saddle area or the lower limbs (including 2 with occasional constipation); 6 still had sense deficit in the saddle area and difficulties in bladder or bowl emptying, but they all reported significant improvements compared to the condition before operation. Urodynamic analysis in the 6 patients with pre-and postoperative urodynamic data showed increased abdominal pressure when voiding with significantly reduced residual urine in all the 6 patients; 4 patients with abnormal first desire volume before operation reported recovery after the operation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with LDH-induced CES who missed the chance of early decompression can still expect favorable functional recovery in the long term. The improvement of bladder function following decompression is probably a result of recovery of bladder sensation and the compensation by increased intra-abdominal pressure. The key strategy to promote bladder function recovery in these patients is to promote the detrusor recovery.

Cauda Equina Syndrome Due to Vigorous Back Massage With Spinal Manipulation in a Patient With Pre-Existing Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Case Report and Literature Review

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) resulting from acute lumbar disc herniation due to spinal massage is extremely rare. We present a case of CES caused by the acute worsening of a lumbar disc herniation after a vigorous back massage that included spinal manipulation. After vigorous back massage with spinal manipulation performed by a massage therapist, a 38-yr-old male patient experienced CES with severe numbness in both lower limbs, inability to walk due to weakness of bilateral lower limbs, and incontinence of urine and feces. The magnetic resonance imaging and computer tomography scan results showed that the L4-5 disc herniated down into the spinal canal, extensively compressing the ventral dural sac. The patient was successfully treated with an emergency operation including laminectomy, spinal canal decompression, discectomy, interbody fusion, and pedicle screw fixation. The muscle power in both lower limbs of the patient recovered rapidly to support standing only 1 wk later. Moreover, he regained continence of urine and feces. In conclusion, this case brings us novel knowledge that spinal massage or manipulation may worsen pre-existing disc herniation causing CES, and a timely emergency surgery is necessary and effective for treatment of CES-related symptoms.

Neurosurgeon or spinal surgeon - who should treat cauda equina syndrome?

Suspected cauda equina syndrome (CES) requires urgent evaluation, investigation and treatment. Timing of cauda equina decompression is crucial, and delays in its management, leading to significant irreversible disability can be devastating for patient and surgeon alike. The standard of care in CES therefore needs to be clear and unambiguous. Todd and Dickson have written an excellent paper summarising the condition, and have outlined what they feel is the standard of care. We would ask the authors to clarify an important point.