1
|
Arras T, Boudewyns A, Dhooge I, Zarowski A, Philips B, Desloovere C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A. Early cochlear implantation supports narrative skills of children with prelingual single-sided deafness. Sci Rep 2023; 13:17828. [PMID: 37857664 PMCID: PMC10587124 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45151-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Prelingual single-sided deafness (SSD) not only affects children's hearing skills, but can also lead to speech-language delays and academic underachievement. Early cochlear implantation leads to improved spatial hearing, but the impact on language development is less studied. In our longitudinal study, we assessed the language skills of young children with SSD and a cochlear implant (CI). In particular, we investigated their narrative skills in comparison to two control groups: children with SSD without a CI, and children with bilateral normal hearing. We found that children with SSD and a CI performed in line with their normal-hearing peers with regard to narrative and verbal short-term memory skills. Children with SSD without a CI had worse narrative (group difference = - 0.67, p = 0.02) and verbal short-term memory (group difference = - 0.68, p = 0.03) scores than the implanted group. Verbal short-term memory scores and grammar scores each correlated positively with narrative scores across all groups. Early grammar scores (at 2-3 years of age) could partially predict later narrative scores (at 4-6 years of age). These results show that young children with prelingual SSD can benefit from early cochlear implantation to achieve age-appropriate language skills. They support the provision of a CI to children with prelingual SSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tine Arras
- Department of Neurosciences, Experimental ORL, KU Leuven, O&N2, Herestraat 49 Bus 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Cochlear Technology Center, Schaliënhoevedreef 20i, 2800, Mechelen, Belgium.
| | - An Boudewyns
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Ingeborg Dhooge
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrzej Zarowski
- European Institute for ORL-HNS, Sint-Augustinus Hospital Antwerp, Oosterveldlaan 24, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Birgit Philips
- Cochlear Technology Center, Schaliënhoevedreef 20i, 2800, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Christian Desloovere
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Wouters
- Department of Neurosciences, Experimental ORL, KU Leuven, O&N2, Herestraat 49 Bus 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Astrid van Wieringen
- Department of Neurosciences, Experimental ORL, KU Leuven, O&N2, Herestraat 49 Bus 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss. Ear Hear 2022; 44:588-602. [PMID: 36575571 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Limited evidence exists for the use of rerouting devices in children with severe-to-profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Many laboratory studies to date have evaluated hearing-in-noise performance in specific target-masker spatial configurations within a small group of participants and with only a subset of available hearing devices. In the present study, the efficacy of all major types of nonsurgical devices was evaluated within a larger group of pediatric subjects on a challenging speech-in-noise recognition task. DESIGN Children (7-18 years) with unaided severe-to-profound unilateral hearing loss (UHL' n = 36) or bilateral normal hearing (NH, n = 36) participated in the present study. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required for 50% speech understanding (SNR-50) was measured using BKB sentences in the presence of proprietary restaurant noise (R-SPACE BSIN-R) in the R-SPACE Sound System. Subjects listened under 2 target/masker spatial configurations. The target signal was directed toward subjects' NH or hearing-impaired ear (45º azimuth), while the interfering restaurant noise masker was presented from the remaining 7 loudspeakers encircling the subject, spaced every 45º. Head position was fixed during testing. The presentation level of target sentences and masking noise varied over time to estimate the SNR-50 (dB). The following devices were tested in all participants with severe-to-profound UHL: air conduction (AC) contralateral routing of signal (CROS), bone conduction (BC) CROS fitted on a headband with and without the use of remote microphone (RM), and an ear-level RM hearing assistance technology (HAT) system. RESULTS As a group, participants with severe-to-profound UHL performed best when the target signal was directed toward their NH ear. Across listening conditions, there was an average 8.5 dB improvement in SNR-50 by simply orienting the NH ear toward the target signal. When unaided, participants with severe-to-profound UHL performed as well as participants with NH when the target signal was directed toward the NH ear. Performance was negatively affected by AC CROS when the target signal was directed toward the NH ear, whereas no statistically significant change in performance was observed when using BC CROS. When the target signal was directed toward participants' hearing-impaired ear, all tested devices improved SNR-50 compared with the unaided condition, with small improvements (1-2 dB) observed with CROS devices and the largest improvement (9 dB) gained with the personal ear-level RM HAT system. No added benefit nor decrement was observed when RM was added to BC CROS using a 50/50 mixing ratio when the target was directed toward the impaired ear. CONCLUSIONS In a challenging listening environment with diffuse restaurant noise, SNR-50 was most improved in the study sample when using a personal ear-level RM HAT system. Although tested rerouting devices offered measurable improvement in performance (1-2 dB in SNR-50) when the target was directed to the impaired ear, benefit may be offset by a detriment in performance in the opposing condition. Findings continue to support use of RM HAT for children with severe-to-profound UHL in adverse listening environments, when there is one primary talker of interest, to ensure advantageous SNRs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Nassrallah F, Tang K, Whittingham J, Sun H, Fitzpatrick EM. Auditory, Social, and Behavioral Skills of Children With Unilateral/Mild Hearing Loss. JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION 2020; 25:167-177. [PMID: 31836889 DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enz041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
This study explored the impact of mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss on auditory, social, and behavior skills in early school-aged children. Thirty-two children (aged 5-9 years) were evaluated with parent and teacher questionnaires. Most outcomes were within the range of expected scores. However, functional auditory skills were below published results for children with typical hearing. On the social skills scale, about 21.4% (parent-reported) and 20.0% (teacher-reported) of children were below one standard deviation (SD) of the normative mean (i.e., a standard score below 85). On the parent-reported behavior test, over a quarter of children scored beyond 1 SD on some subscales. Laterality of hearing loss had no effect on outcomes (p > .05). Agreement between parents and teachers varied from poor (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: .162) to moderate (ICC: .448). Results indicate that these children are functioning in most areas like their peers with typical hearing. Additional research on this population of children who may benefit from early identification and amplification is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora Nassrallah
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute
| | - Ken Tang
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute
| | | | - Huidan Sun
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute
| | - Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Griffin AM, Poissant SF, Freyman RL. Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Ear Hear 2020; 40:887-904. [PMID: 30418282 PMCID: PMC7104694 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) Measure sentence recognition in co-located and spatially separated target and masker configurations in school-aged children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and with normal hearing (NH). (2) Compare self-reported hearing-related quality-of-life (QoL) scores in school-aged children with UHL and NH. DESIGN Listeners were school-aged children (6 to 12 yrs) with permanent UHL (n = 41) or NH (n = 35) and adults with NH (n = 23). Sentence reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured using Hearing In Noise Test-Children sentences in quiet and in the presence of 2-talker child babble or a speech-shaped noise masker in target/masker spatial configurations: 0/0, 0/-60, 0/+60, or 0/±60 degrees azimuth. Maskers were presented at a fixed level of 55 dBA, while the level of the target sentences varied adaptively to estimate the SRT. Hearing-related QoL was measured using the Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life (HEAR-QL-26) questionnaire for child subjects. RESULTS As a group, subjects with unaided UHL had higher (poorer) SRTs than age-matched peers with NH in all listening conditions. Effects of age, masker type, and spatial configuration of target and masker signals were found. Spatial release from masking was significantly reduced in conditions where the masker was directed toward UHL subjects' normal-hearing ear. Hearing-related QoL scores were significantly poorer in subjects with UHL compared to those with NH. Degree of UHL, as measured by four-frequency pure-tone average, was significantly correlated with SRTs only in the two conditions where the masker was directed towards subjects' normal-hearing ear, although the unaided Speech Intelligibility Index at 65 dB SPL was significantly correlated with SRTs in four conditions, some of which directed the masker to the impaired ear or both ears. Neither pure-tone average nor unaided Speech Intelligibility Index was correlated with QoL scores. CONCLUSIONS As a group, school-aged children with UHL showed substantial reductions in masked speech perception and hearing-related QoL, irrespective of sex, laterality of hearing loss, and degree of hearing loss. While some children demonstrated normal or near-normal performance in certain listening conditions, a disproportionate number of thresholds fell in the poorest decile of the NH data. These findings add to the growing literature challenging the past assumption that one ear is "good enough."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda M Griffin
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah F Poissant
- Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Richard L Freyman
- Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Griffin AM, Poissant SF, Freyman RL. Auditory Comprehension in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; 51:29-41. [PMID: 31913800 DOI: 10.1044/2019_lshss-ochl-19-0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to measure auditory comprehension performance in school-aged children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and with normal hearing (NH) in quiet and in the presence of child-produced two-talker babble (TTB). Method Listeners were school-aged children (7-12 years) with permanent UHL (n = 25) or NH (n = 14). Comprehension of three short stories taken from the Test of Narrative Language (Gillam & Pearson, 2004) was measured in quiet and in the presence of TTB at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs): (a) +6 dB and (b) the individualized SNR required to achieve 50% sentence understanding in the presence of the same TTB masker in a prior study (Griffin, Poissant, & Freyman, 2019). Target/masker spatial configuration was 0°/±60° azimuth. Results As a group, subjects with UHL demonstrated auditory comprehension abilities in favorable listening environments (i.e., quiet, +6 dB SNR) that were statistically equivalent to the NH group. However, in the most challenging listening condition (individualized SNR), many subjects with UHL demonstrated poorer comprehension performance than their age-matched peers with NH. Comprehension abilities were not associated with degree of UHL, unaided speech intelligibility index at 65 dB SPL in the impaired ear, side of UHL, or sex. Conclusions As a group, children with UHL demonstrated deficits in auditory comprehension compared to age-matched peers with NH in challenging listening environments. Findings highlight the importance of ensuring good SNRs for children with UHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda M Griffin
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, MA.,Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sarah F Poissant
- Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst
| | - Richard L Freyman
- Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huttunen K, Erixon E, Löfkvist U, Mäki-Torkko E. The impact of permanent early-onset unilateral hearing impairment in children - A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 120:173-183. [PMID: 30836274 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision-making on treatment and (re)habilitation needs to be based on clinical expertise and scientific evidence. Research evidence for the impact of permanent unilateral hearing impairment (UHI) on children's development has been mixed and, in some of the reports, based on fairly small, heterogeneous samples. Additionally, treatment provided has been highly variable, ranging from no action taken or watchful waiting up to single-sided cochlear implantation. Published information about the effects of treatment has also been heterogeneous. Moreover, earlier reviews and meta-analyses published on the impact of UHI on children's development have generally focused on select areas of development. OBJECTIVES This systematic review aimed to summarize the impact of children's congenital or early onset unilateral hearing impairment on listening and auditory skills, communication, speech and language development, cognitive development, educational achievements, psycho-social development, and quality of life. METHODS Literature searches were performed to identify reports published from inception to February 16th, 2018 with the main electronic bibliographic databases in medicine, psychology, education, and speech and hearing sciences as the data sources. PubMed, CINALH, ERIC, LLBA, PsychINFO, and ISI Web of Science were searched for unilateral hearing impairment with its synonyms and consequences of congenital or early onset unilateral hearing impairment. Eligible were articles written in English, German, or Swedish on permanent unilateral hearing impairments that are congenital or with onset before three years of age. Hearing impairment had to be of at least a moderate degree with PTA ≥40 dB averaged over frequencies 0.5 to 2 or 0.5-4 kHz, hearing in the contralateral ear had to have PTA0.5-2 kHz or PTA0.5-4 kHz ≤ 20 dB, and consequences of unilateral hearing impairment needed to be reported in an unanimously defined population in at least one of the areas the review focused on. Four researchers independently screened 1618 abstracts and 566 full-text articles for evaluation of study eligibility. Eligible full-text articles were then reviewed to summarize the results and assess the quality of evidence. Additionally, data from 13 eligible case and multi-case studies, each having less than 10 participants, were extracted to summarize their results. Quality assessment of evidence was made adapting the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process, and reporting of the results adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. RESULTS Three articles with the quality of evidence graded as very-low to low, fulfilled the eligibility criteria set. Due to the heterogeneity of the articles, only a descriptive summary could be generated from the results. Unilateral hearing impairment was reported to have a negative impact on preverbal vocalization of infants and on sound localization and speech perception both in quiet and in noise. CONCLUSIONS No high-quality studies of consequences of early-onset UHI in children were found. Inconsistency in assessing and reporting outcomes, the relatively small number of participants, low directness of evidence, and the potential risk of confounding factors in the reviewed studies prevented any definite conclusions. Further well-designed prospective research using larger samples is warranted on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerttu Huttunen
- Faculty of Humanities, Logopedics, and Child Language Research Center, University of Oulu, Finland; PEDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland; MRC Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Oulu University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oulu, Finland.
| | - Elsa Erixon
- Uppsala University, Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Ulrika Löfkvist
- University of Oslo, Department of Special Needs Education, Oslo, Norway; Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Elina Mäki-Torkko
- Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro, Sweden; Örebro University Hospital, Audiological Research Center, Örebro, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anne S, Lieu JEC, Cohen MS. Speech and Language Consequences of Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 157:572-579. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599817726326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective Unilateral hearing loss has been shown to have negative consequences for speech and language development in children. The objective of this study was to systematically review the current literature to quantify the impact of unilateral hearing loss on children, with the use of objective measures of speech and language. Data Sources PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2015. Manual searches of references were also completed. Review Methods All studies that described speech and language outcomes for children with unilateral hearing loss were included. Outcome measures included results from any test of speech and language that evaluated or had age-standardized norms. Due to heterogeneity of the data, quantitative analysis could not be completed. Qualitative analysis was performed on the included studies. Two independent evaluators reviewed each abstract and article. Results A total of 429 studies were identified; 13 met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Overall, 7 studies showed poorer scores on various speech and language tests, with effects more pronounced for children with severe to profound hearing loss. Four studies did not demonstrate any difference in testing results between patients with unilateral hearing loss and those with normal hearing. Two studies that evaluated effects on speech and language longitudinally showed initial speech problems, with improvement in scores over time. Conclusions There are inconsistent data regarding effects of unilateral hearing loss on speech and language outcomes for children. The majority of recent studies suggest poorer speech and language testing results, especially for patients with severe to profound unilateral hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Anne
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Judith E. C. Lieu
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael S. Cohen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|