Sleep Behaviors and Parent Functioning in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes

Around-the-clock: Caregiving at night for juveniles living with type 1 diabetes - a systematic review

Caring for children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) can require around-the-clock attention but there is little acknowledgment of the impact that nocturnal caregiving can have on caregivers in clinical care provision. This systematic review aimed to (1) explicate nocturnal caregiving practice (NCP) by identifying and synthesising peer-reviewed research to establish the prevalence and nature of NCP, (2) explore the impacts of NCP for caregivers, (3) evaluate the perceived value of technology for supporting NCP, and (4) examine potential solutions for mitigating NCP burden. In January, 2022, the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus and EMBASE were searched to identify peer-reviewed studies, published in English since 1997, which addressed NCP for juveniles with T1D. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies were included. Risk of bias analysis was carried out using the quality assessment with diverse studies tool. Where possible, quantitative data were aggregated. Qualitative data was subjected to a narrative synthesis, using thematic analysis. Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 3,547 caregivers. 88% of caregivers engaged in NCP, though frequency was variable. Over 50% of participants (19-80%) failed to get adequate sleep and 54% reported poor sleep quality. Qualitative testimony detailed adverse impacts of NCP; exhaustion, difficulty making illness-management decisions, negative impacts on mood and physical health. Benefits from technology were equivocal. Evidence regarding predictors and associations for NCP, such as patient age, was contradictory. 83% of authors recommended that sleep be routinely addressed in clinic, which is not current practice. This review provides clear evidence that NCP in T1D is pervasive with significant negative impacts on caregivers. These secondary impacts of juvenile T1D need to be acknowledged so that care guidelines can be modified and psychosocial supports can be developed for use in clinical treatment environments.

Towards the standardisation of adult person-reported outcome domains in diabetes research: A Consensus Statement development panel

Diabetes is unique among chronic diseases because clinical outcomes are intimately tied to how the person living with diabetes reacts to and implements treatment recommendations. It is further characterised by widespread social stigma, judgement and paternalism. This physical, social and psychological burden collectively influences self-management behaviours. It is widely recognised that the individual's perspective about the impact of trying to manage the disease and the burden that self-management confers must be addressed to achieve optimal health outcomes. Standardised, rigorous assessment of mental and behavioural health status, in interaction with physical health outcomes is crucial to aid understanding of person-reported outcomes (PROs). Whilst tempting to conceptualise PROs as an issue of perceived quality of life (QoL), in fact health-related QoL is multi-dimensional and covers indicators of physical or functional health status, psychological and social well-being. This complexity is illuminated by the large number of person reported outcome measures (PROMs) that have been developed across multiple psychosocial domains. Often measures are used inappropriately or because they have been used in the scientific literature rather than based on methodological or outcome assessment rigour. Given the broad nature of psychosocial functioning/mental health, it is important to broadly define PROs that are evaluated in the context of therapeutic interventions, real-life and observational studies. This report summarises the central themes and lessons derived in the assessment and use of PROMs amongst adults with diabetes. Effective assessment of PROMs routinely in clinical research is crucial to understanding the true impact of any intervention. Selecting appropriate measures, relevant to the specific factors of PROs important in the research study will provide valuable data alongside physical health data.

Insomnia severity among caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes: A mixed method study

AIM

This research was conducted to assess the severity of insomnia experienced by caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes.

METHOD

In this study, a mixed-method descriptive sequential pattern design was employed, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative research methods. In the study, 152 caregivers were surveyed for quantitative data on survey form and insomnia severity. Additionally, 9 mothers underwent semi-structured interviews for qualitative insights.

RESULTS

Of caregivers, 13.8% were identified to experience clinical insomnia. There were statistically significant differences in insomnia severity index scores in terms of experiencing sleep problems after the child's type 1 diabetes diagnosis, caregivers having adequate sleep duration at night, how they felt on waking in the morning, difficulty managing their child's diabetes the next day due to lack of sleep, difficulty getting to sleep at night, sleeping more than one hour during the day, lack of sleep due to caring and treatment, lack of sleep due to not meeting the desired targets for blood glucose values and receiving support for type 1 diabetes management due to lack of sleep (p < 0.05). Three themes were identified as a result of qualitative analysis: Sleep status of caregivers, effect of sleep problems on daily life and solving sleep problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers experience insomnia during the process of type 1 diabetes management and this situation affects their daytime care duties.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Research shows caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes often face insomnia, highlighting the need for solutions.

Health-Related Quality of Life of Adolescents and Children With Type 1 Diabetes in the Jazan Region of Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is increasingly prevalent among Saudi Arabian youth, particularly in the Jazan region. This chronic condition necessitates lifelong insulin therapy and poses significant daily management challenges for affected adolescents. Despite the high incidence rates, there is a notable lack of research into how T1DM impacts the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of these individuals.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess HRQoL and its demographic correlates in T1DM patients in the Jazan region of Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 236 T1DM patients completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Diabetes Module 3.0 (PedsQL DM). The HRQoL across domains of diabetes symptoms, treatment barriers, adherence, worry, and communication was compared by gender, nationality, age, education, residence, and healthcare follow-up using t-tests and ANOVA. Multivariate regression identified predictors of overall HRQoL.

RESULTS

Most respondents were female (51.3%), 42.8% were between the ages of seven and 12 years, and 94.5% were Saudi nationals. Males reported better HRQoL than females, with fewer symptoms, treatment barriers, and better communication (all p<0.05). Non-Saudis had better treatment adherence, communication, and overall HRQoL than Saudis (all p<0.05). Older children (13-18 years) reported lower treatment barriers than younger children (three to six years) (p<0.05). Those with intermediate education had lower treatment barriers than those with preliminary education (p = 0.038). Only the female gender (-0.171, p = 0.009) independently predicted poorer overall HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed disparities in HRQoL among T1DM children and adolescents. Males, non-Saudis, older children, and those with more education had better HRQoL. Females were at particular risk for poorer outcomes. Targeted interventions are needed to address this region's demographic disparities in diabetes-related HRQoL.

Twelve-month psychosocial outcomes of continuous glucose monitoring with behavioural support in parents of young children with type 1 diabetes

AIM

Managing type 1 diabetes in young children can cause significant stress for parents. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may reduce parental burden. The Strategies to Enhance CGM Use in Early Childhood (SENCE) trial randomized parents of children (ages 2 to <8 years) with type 1 diabetes to CGM with family behavioural intervention (CGM + FBI), CGM alone (Standard-CGM) or blood glucose monitoring for 26 weeks before receiving CGM + FBI (BGM-Crossover). This report assesses changes in psychosocial outcomes for all groups over 52 weeks.

METHODS

CGM + FBI (n = 45), Standard-CGM (n = 42) and BGM-Crossover (n = 44) participants completed psychosocial assessments at baseline, 26 weeks and 52 weeks. Repeated measures linear regression models evaluated change within and between treatment groups.

RESULTS

The BGM-Crossover group reported improved diabetes burden (Δ -6.9, 95% CI [-11.3, -2.6], p = 0.003), fear of hypoglycaemia (Δ -6.4, CI [-10.1, -2.6], p = 0.002) and technology satisfaction (Δ 7.3, CI [2.4, 12.2], p = 0.005) from 26 to 52 weeks, similar to published findings in the CGM + FBI group over the first 26 weeks. The Standard-CGM group reported increased technology satisfaction (Δ 7.3, CI [0.6, 14.0], p = 0.027) from baseline to 52 weeks. The CGM + FBI group reported less diabetes burden and fear of hypoglycaemia from baseline to 52 weeks, but changes were not statistically significant. Scores from 26 to 52 weeks did not deteriorate.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents demonstrated psychosocial benefits following FBI that appeared to maintain without additional intervention. CGM-focused education with behavioural support likely helps parents of young children with type 1 diabetes reduce burden and worry in the short- and long-term.

Sleep and Circadian Rhythm Disturbances in Diabetes: A Narrative Review

Sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances are less-known risk factors for the development and suboptimal outcomes of diabetes. The goal of this narrative review is to highlight the importance of sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances in the development and outcomes of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), assess current treatment options and the possible mediating mechanisms. We performed a literature search using PubMed and selected relevant English and Dutch papers. Disturbances of sleep and circadian rhythm are common in people with diabetes. They are associated with an increased risk of developing T2D as well as with suboptimal diabetes outcomes (including higher HbA1c levels and reduced quality of life) for T1D and T2D. Preliminary data suggest that treatment of sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances could improve diabetes outcomes in people with T1D and T2D. Finally, the association with medical parameters appears to be mediated by disturbance in hormones, and by suboptimal self-care including forgetting or postponing glucose monitoring or medication use as well as higher consumption of high fat/high sugary foods. Diabetes may also disturb sleep, for example through nocturnal hypoglycemia and nocturia. We concluded that sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances are closely linked with diabetes. More attention to sleep in regular diabetes care is warranted, while further research is needed on treatment of sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances in the prevention of diabetes and its suboptimal outcomes.

Up all night? Sleep disruption in parents of young children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Despite the known challenges of parental adjustment to new-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) in young children, little is known about parental sleep soon after diagnosis.

METHODS

Parents (n = 157) of young children (4.5 ± 1.6 years) with new-onset T1D (29 ± 15 days) self-reported their sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) at the baseline of a behavioral randomized control trial. We examined sleep patterns and relations with continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use.

RESULTS

Over two-thirds (68.8%) reported poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5, M = 8.3 ± 4.1). The mean reported sleep duration was 5.9 ± 1.4 h/night. PSQI scores did not significantly differ by CGM use.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep disruption is a pervasive self-reported problem among parents of young children emerging early after the T1D diagnosis. Healthcare providers should discuss parental sleep as part of diabetes care soon after diagnosis. Further interventions targeting parental sleep may be of benefit.

'I don't sleep through the night': Qualitative study of sleep in type 1 diabetes

AIMS

Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience greater sleep disturbances than people without diabetes. However, the nature, causes and effects of sleep disruption in individuals with T1D and their family are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to explore and characterise the perspectives of parents, partners and individuals with diabetes about T1D-related sleep issues.

METHODS

Participants included 44 youth and adults with T1D (ages 9-69), 24 parents of youth with T1D, and 14 partners of adults with T1D, recruited from diabetes clinics at two academic medical centres in the Southwestern and Midwestern United States. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded and analysed using hybrid thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We identified two central themes: Emotional Distress and Sleep Disruption. Each theme had multiple subthemes, and the two central themes were related to one another via a shared subtheme, Worry Impacting Sleep.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex T1D-related emotional and behavioural factors both contributed to and resulted from sleep difficulties. Diabetes care providers should routinely assess for sleep concerns in people with T1D and their parents and partners. It may be important to consider both diabetes-related causes of sleep disruptions and potential impacts on self management and emotional functioning.

Emergency Glucagon: a Focused Review of Psychosocial Experiences of Rescue Drugs for Type 1 Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this paper is to describe rescue glucagon types, safety, efficacy, and preferences, as well as to review articles regarding emergency glucagon usage, severe hypoglycemia, and the emotions of both phenomena. We conducted a review of current literature on glucagon usage and the emotional impact of severe hypoglycemia on people with diabetes (PwD) and the caregivers of people with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

RECENT FINDINGS

Minimal research exists pertaining to glucagon and severe hypoglycemic experiences in PwD, which is troubling considering the severity of risks and possible side effects. Recent articles described negative emotions such as fear, anxiety, stress, helplessness, shame, embarrassment, loneliness, frustration, hopefulness, and uncertainty surrounding glucagon usage. There is scarce research regarding PwD's emotions surrounding severe hypoglycemia and rescue glucagon use. Additional research is needed to investigate the emotions and feelings people with T1D and their caregivers' experience pertaining to severe hypoglycemia and emergency glucagon use.

Sleep and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Management Among Children, Adolescents, and Emerging Young Adults: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most common chronic illnesses among the youth. Emerging evidence has suggested poor sleep as a risk factor for glycemic control. This review aimed to examine the associations between sleep characteristics and diabetes management in children, adolescents, and emerging young adults with T1DM.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors searched articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from 2000 through August 2020. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria, observational studies and clinical trials that examined sleep and diabetes management among individuals with T1DM (up to 25 years old) were selected for review.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles met the review criteria. Most studies did not report differences in self-report sleep between individuals with and without T1DM. However, several studies using objective sleep measures (actigraph and PSG) suggested shorter sleep duration and worse sleep quality in individuals with T1DM. Higher A1C levels and undesirable T1DM self-care behaviors were associated with short and long sleep duration, poor sleep quality, sleep disturbances, and irregular sleep, particularly among adolescent boys, young men and those from immigrant families. Self-care behaviors mediated the associations between sleep and subsequent A1C levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Too much or too little sleep, poor sleep quality, sleep disturbances and sleep variability are associated with undesirable T1DM management. Although more research is needed, our findings indicate the importance of including sleep education in the plan of care for children, adolescents and emerging young adults with T1DM.

Relationship of glycaemic derangement using continuous glucose monitoring system with sleep pattern among children with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Glycaemic derangement has been linked to sleep disruption. However, the impact of glycaemic derangement on sleep pattern among children with type 1 diabetes (C-T1D) remains unraveled.

AIM

To assess the effect of nocturnal hyperglycaemia and clinically significant (CS) hypoglycaemia on sleep pattern among C-T1D.

METHODOLOGY

Thirty C-T1D were compared to 30 age and sex matched healthy siblings. Patients having other organ disease that might cause sleep disorders or on medications causing sleep disturbance were excluded. History included diabetes-duration, type and dose of insulin therapy, chronic diabetic-complications, and manifestations of sleep disorders. Epworth Sleepiness Scale-Child Adolescent was used. Continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and overnight polysomnography were done and analysed.

RESULTS

C-T1D had significantly lower sleep efficiency and significantly higher arousal index (AI), periodic limb movement index and apnoea-hypopnoea index compared to controls. Moreover, they had significantly longer sleep-onset latency, light sleep percentage, and shorter rapid eye movement percentage than controls. According to nocturnal CGMS readings, 15 C-T1D had nocturnal hyperglycaemia (50%), six experienced CS hypoglycaemia (20%), two had level-1 hypoglycaemia (6.7%), and seven were within the normoglycaemic range (23.3%). C-T1D experiencing nocturnal CS hypoglycaemia had significantly higher stage 3 sleep (P = 0.004) than controls. On the other hand, C- T1D experiencing nocturnal hyperglycaemia had significantly higher sleep onset latency (P = 0.013), light sleep percentage (P < 0.001), and AI (P < 0.001) than controls. Nocturnal CS hypoglycaemia was positively correlated to deep sleep duration, while hyperglycaemia was correlated to number of awakenings, sleep-onset latency, and light sleep duration.

CONCLUSION

In children with T1D CS hypoglycaemia is associated with sleep deepening, while hyperglycaemia is associated with increased light sleep, sleep onset latency.

Impact of type 1 diabetes mellitus, glucose levels, and glycemic control on sleep in children and adolescents: a case-control study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess differences in habitual sleep patterns and sleep states between children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and control subjects, and to explore the relationships between sleep, glucose levels, and glycemic control.

METHODS

Participants included 82 children (5-18 years); 41 with T1DM (cases), and 41 healthy control subjects group matched for age and sex. Sleep was measured by 7-day actigraphy and single-night home-based polysomnography (PSG) recordings. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and 7 days of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were collected in cases. Regression analyses were used to model all within- and between-group comparisons adjusted for age, sex, and BMI z-scores.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in sleep duration, efficiency, or awakenings as measured by actigraphy and PSG between cases and controls, nor sleep states measured by PSG. However, cases had significantly later sleep onset and offset than controls (both p < 0.05), partially moderated by age. Cases with suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 58 mmol/mol [≥7.5%]) had significantly shorter actigraphy-derived total sleep time (TST) (mean difference = -40 minutes; 95% confidence interval = -77, -3), with similar differences in TST measured by PSG. Cases with mean CGM glucose levels ≥10 mmol/L (≥180 mg/dL) on PSG night had significantly more stage N3 (%) sleep and less stage REM (%) sleep (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Short- and long-term suboptimal glycemic control in T1DM children appears to be associated with sleep alterations. Pediatric diabetes care teams should be aware of potential interrelationships between sleep and T1DM, including management and glycemic control.

"I've Had an Alarm Set for 3:00 a.m. for Decades": The Impact of Type 1 Diabetes on Sleep

There is a dearth of research characterizing the impact on a caregiver's sleep when caring for a minor with type 1 diabetes. This study used focus groups of people with type 1 diabetes and caregivers of minors with type 1 diabetes to explore the experience of how diabetes affects sleep. The occurrence of both unanticipated and planned sleep disruptions led to the majority of participants reporting that their sleep was considerably affected by diabetes. Despite the improvement in blood glucose management that diabetes technology devices can provide, people with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers still report sleep disruption and sleep loss resulting from overnight diabetes management.

Parental Stress, Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Associated with Self-Efficacy in Paediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Literature Review

Background: Parents play a significant role in the management and monitoring of their children’s Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), being considered a family disease. The current review intends to investigate parental stress, depression and anxiety symptoms associated with self-efficacy referred to paediatric diabetes management. Method: A literature review was carried out using PsycINFO, Web of Science and PubMed where the following terms were considered: diabetes mellitus, paediatric, parent-child relationship, self-efficacy, parenting stress, perceived stress, stress, depression, anxiety. Standing a defined list of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 33 papers were finally included. Results: Findings have shown that parents experience relatively high levels of anxiety, depression and stress symptoms related to managing a child with T1DM and are associated with parental self-efficacy. Parental stress predicts a worsening in the control of HbA1c levels, while parental diabetes-specific distress predicts an increase in children depression symptoms. High parental self-efficacy associates with better monitoring, allowing better adherence and more balanced HbA1c levels in the children. Conclusions: Interventions aimed at fostering social support, improving diabetes management, and decreasing perceived stress, might alleviate parents’ psychological symptoms by focusing on increasing their self-efficacy. Digital interventions might also represent valuable solutions to support parents in the management of paediatric diabetes not presented and substantiated in the main text and should not exaggerate the main conclusions.

Sleep and Night-time Caregiving in Parents of Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus - A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a common chronic illness of childhood, with parents assuming considerable responsibility for night-time diabetes caregiving. This qualitative study explored diabetes-related factors affecting, and solutions proposed to improve, parental sleep.

PARTICIPANTS

10 mothers and 10 fathers of children ≤18 years of age with T1DM in Otago, New Zealand.

METHODS

Semi-structured individual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and systematically coded for themes. Parents completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and habitual sleep of parents and children were assessed via 7-day actigraphy.

RESULTS

Parents (n = 20) and their children with T1DM (n = 16) were aged between 32 and 54 years, and 1 and 17 years, respectively. PSQI revealed poor quality sleep in 13/20 parents. A range of diabetes-related factors, including glucose monitoring and fear of hypoglycemia, contributed to parental sleep disturbance, including awakenings and the perception of "sleeping lightly". Two distinct time periods resulted in greater sleep disturbance, notably, following T1DM diagnosis and when transitioning to using a new diabetes technology. Factors influencing maternal and paternal sleep were similar, but, generally, mothers described greater night-time care burden and sleep disturbance. While the use of diabetes technologies was generally advocated to improve parental sleep and the provision of nocturnal T1DM care, they were also perceived to potentially contribute to parental sleep disturbance.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric diabetes care teams should be aware of diabetes-related factors potentially affecting parental sleep, the mixed impacts of diabetes technologies, and consider tailored parental support and education to reduce the burden of nocturnal care.

Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Sleep, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Continuous Glucose Monitor Use

While children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents report significant sleep problems, few studies have focused on young children and included health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as an outcome of sleep disturbance. In addition, relatively little is known about the use of diabetes devices, such as continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), in young children and their link with sleep disturbances. This brief report examines the relationship between sleep quality and HRQOL and explores sleep disturbances related to CGM use in a sample of young children with T1D. Data are from the baseline of a behavioral intervention pilot for 46 parents of children ages 2-5 years with T1D. Parents reported on their child's sleep disturbances as a result of nighttime blood glucose monitoring (NBGM). Sleep was measured objectively in a subset of children (N = 11) who wore accelerometers for a 5-day period. All parents completed measures of pediatric and parental HRQOL. Greater child sleep disturbance due to NBGM was associated with lower pediatric HRQOL. Child sleep disturbances were negatively associated with parental life satisfaction. In addition, children who used CGM experienced fewer sleep disturbances than those who did not. However, parents of children who used CGM experienced greater sleep disturbances related to a higher frequency of NBGM. Pediatric and parental HRQOL were most related to child sleep disturbances by NBGM. CGM use may be associated with better child sleep, as parents are less likely to wake their child for NBGM, although CGM use may also be associated with greater sleep difficulties in parents. Future studies should further explore the relationship between sleep and technology use and impact on clinical outcomes in young children with T1D and their parents.

Associations Between Objective Sleep Behaviors and Blood Glucose Variability in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Young children with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) are at risk for extreme blood glucose variability, a risk factor for suboptimal glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and long-term health complications. We know that a reciprocal relationship exists between sleep and glycemic outcomes in older youth with T1D; however, little research has examined objective sleep in young children (<7 years) with T1D.

PURPOSE

This study examines bidirectional associations between sleep behaviors and glycemic variability in young children with T1D.

METHODS

Thirty-nine young children with T1D (Mage 4.33 ± 1.46 years; MHbA1c 8.10 ± 1.06%) provided accelerometry data to objectively measure sleep onset latency, number of nighttime awakenings, and total sleep time. We also assessed HbA1c, average blood glucose, and glycemic variability (i.e., standard deviation of blood glucose from device downloads). We evaluated bidirectional relationships using multilevel modeling in SAS, with weekday/weekend as a Level 2 moderator.

RESULTS

Children averaged 8.5 ± 1.44 hr of sleep per night, but only 12.8% met current sleep recommendations. Children experienced more nighttime awakenings, higher blood glucose, and more glycemic variability on weekends. Sleep onset latency and nighttime awakenings predicted greater glycemic variability on weekends, and weekend glycemic variability predicted increased nighttime awakenings.

CONCLUSIONS

Most young children with T1D did not meet sleep recommendations. Young children experienced more nighttime awakenings, higher blood glucose, and increased glycemic variability on weekends only, when routines may be less predictable. Findings suggest that one way families of young children with T1D may be able to decrease glycemic variability is to keep consistent routines on weekdays and weekends.

Parental stress, anxiety and trait mindfulness: associations with parent-child mealtime interactions in children with type 1 diabetes

Introduction This study examined how maternal and paternal stress, anxiety, and trait mindfulness, and child glycemic control are related to real-life parent-child interactions in families confronted with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods Parents reported on trait mindfulness, illness-related parenting stress, general stress, and state anxiety. Parent-child mealtime interactions were videotaped and scored in 33 families (31 mothers and 20 fathers) of children with T1D (5-12y., mean HbA1c = 7.22%). Results Parental stress and anxiety were related to more maladaptive and less adaptive parent-child interactions. For mothers, mindfulness was related to less observed discomfort of the child during injection. For fathers, more emotional involvement was related to better child glycemic control. Discussion Results indicate that parental stress and anxiety may be risk factors for maladaptive parent-child interactions.

Sleep-related disorders in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: current insights

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune condition that results from destruction of beta cells in the pancreas. Several reviews have concluded that sleep contributes to poor glycemic control, diabetes management, and diabetes-related complications in individuals with T1DM and represents an untapped opportunity for intervention. However, at the current juncture, the American Diabetes Association's Standards of Medical Care are devoid of recommendations about how to address sleep in the management of T1DM. This article summarizes reviews of sleep in youth and adults with T1DM and empirical studies that have examined various sleep parameters ranging from sleep disturbances (general, perceived sleep quality, sleepiness, awakenings, and sleep efficiency), sleep duration, sleep consistency, sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and sleep architecture. The data show that many individuals with T1DM sleep less than recommendations; individuals with the poorest sleep have difficulties with diabetes management; and sleep deficiency including SDB often corresponds to several disease morbidities (neuropathy, nephropathy, etc). Mixed findings exist regarding direct associations of various sleep parameters and glycemic control. SDB appears to be just as prevalent, if not more, than other conditions that have been recommended for universal screening in individuals with T1DM. The article concludes with recommendations for collaborative research efforts to further elucidate the role of sleep in diabetes-related outcomes; investigations to test behavioral strategies to increase sleep quantity and consistency; and considerations for clinical care to address sleep.

Sleep in Parental Caregivers and Children With Type 1 Diabetes

The purpose of this cross-sectional, descriptive, pilot study was to examine the correlations in sleep between caregivers (≥18 years) and young (6-12 years) children with type 1 diabetes. Sleep was measured in both parent and child over 7 days using actigraphy and a sleep diary. Parents completed questionnaires on sleep, stress, depressive symptoms, and demographics. Children completed pediatric anxiety and fatigue questionnaires, and A1C (Hemoglobin A1c) was documented at clinic. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations were used to analyze data. Parents (N = 18, mean age: 39.3 ± 5.4 years, 100% Caucasian, 83% mothers) and children (N = 18, mean age: 9.6 ± 2.4 years, diagnosed for mean 3.0 ± 2.4 years, 66% female, mean A1C: 7.5 ± 0.8%) were recruited. Strong to moderate correlations were found for several measures including sleep measures based on actigraphy: mean sleep duration (hours; 7.6 ± 0.7 for parents and 8.8 ± 0.8 for children; r = .638, p = .004), mean sleep efficiency (r = .823, p < .001), and mean daily wake after sleep onset (minutes; r = .530, p = .024).

Sleep and type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents: Proposed theoretical model and clinical implications

Youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) experience more sleep disturbances and shorter sleep durations compared to their healthy peers. Researchers have now uncovered the negative mental health and physical health outcomes associated with poor sleep in youth with T1D. The field of T1D sleep research currently operates under the broad notion that sleep behaviors impact treatment adherence, which ultimately lead to worse long-term health outcomes. This model however does not explain how behavior influences T1D management and sleep outcomes on a day-to-day basis, leading to difficulties in providing tailored treatment recommendations. In this review, we present a theoretical framework that describes the recursive cycle between sleep behaviors, T1D outcomes, and symptoms of negative affect/stress over a 24-hour period. This model is guided by the sleep literature, showing a clear relationship between poor sleep and negative affect, and the T1D literature demonstrating a link between poor sleep and disease management for youth with T1D. Further, emerging literature indicates a need for additional parent sleep assessment considering that T1D management and fear of hypoglycemia negatively impact parent sleep behaviors. Recommendations are provided to move the field toward effective intervention studies and new areas of research to evaluate and modify the proposed model.

Sleep in Caregivers of Children With Type 1 Diabetes

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to explore caregivers’ descriptions of their experience of nighttime sleep.

Design and Methods

Caregivers (N = 22) of children 10 to 18 years of age with type 1 diabetes (T1D) were recruited for this descriptive study. Anonymous questionnaires contained demographic information and both open- and closed-ended questions that focused on caregiving as it related to sleep. Open-ended questions were reviewed to help understand the effect of nocturnal caregiving activities on parental sleep.

Results

The sample of caregivers were all female and had a mean age of 43 years; 96% graduated high school, 68% were married or partnered, and 100% were white. Children had been diagnosed with T1D for a mean of 5 years, with a mean age of 12.2 years. Caregivers reported short sleep duration (mean, 5.8 hours). Over half of the participants reported they required ≥7 hours of sleep to feel their best, 64% indicated trouble sleeping at night, and 86% reported that caregiving interfered with their nighttime sleep, while 54% responded that sleep was “very important.” Content analysis of the open-ended questions revealed 2 themes: (1) anxiety about the child’s blood glucose levels and (2) nighttime disruptions.

Conclusions

Caregivers are frequently sleep deprived and worry about their child’s nighttime glucose. Caregiving duties, anxiety, and sleep fragmentation may contribute to their poor sleep.

Design and development of a stepped-care behavioral intervention to support parents of young children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes

One of the most common chronic conditions of childhood, the prevalence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in young children is increasing. Early childhood development complicates optimal T1D management and glycemic outcomes. Parents are at risk for elevated psychological distress, especially immediately following diagnosis. Few empirically supported interventions are available to support parents and promote optimal T1D management during this vulnerable period. This paper reports on the development and study design of First STEPS: Study of Type 1 in Early childhood and Parenting Support. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a stepped care behavioral intervention for parents of young children over the first year following a new T1D diagnosis. The stepped care design provides participants with up to three intensity levels, or steps, of clinical behavioral intervention support based on need, compared to usual care. Intervention steps include peer parent coaching, telephone-based behavioral support, personalized psychological assessment and recommendations, and intensive assessment of T1D glycemic management with recommendations. Primary outcomes include children's glycemic control and parents' psychosocial functioning. Secondary outcomes include children's behavioral and psychosocial functioning. Exploratory analyses will evaluate demographic, disease-specific, and psychosocial factors related to progression in and response to each step of the intervention.

Management and Family Burdens Endorsed by Parents of Youth <7 Years Old With Type 1 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

This study investigated unique burdens experienced by parents of young children with type 1 diabetes in the context of contemporary diabetes management.

METHODS

Self-report surveys and medical record information from the T1D Exchange clinic registry were used. Parental burden and family impact scores were tabulated across demographic and clinical characteristics, overall and according to age group (<4, 4-<6, and 6-<7 years).

RESULTS

The mean age of the 597 children was 5.2 ± 1.2 years (n = 111 <4 years, n = 291 4-<6 years, and n = 195 6-<7 years) and mean duration of diabetes was 2.4 ± 1.1 years. Mean hemoglobin A1c was 8.2% ± 1.1%. Approximately one-third (31%) reported their child was currently using CGM and over half (58%) reported using insulin pumps. The most frequently endorsed parent-reported burdens of diabetes were worrying about child having a low blood sugar (74%), about the future and possibility of serious complications (70%), and feeling upset when their child's diabetes management is "off track" (61%). Areas endorsed for negative family impact were diminished amount or quality of sleep for family members (59%) and need for flexible working arrangements to help care for their child (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial burdens remain for parents of young children with type 1 diabetes, despite the availability of advanced technologies for diabetes management.

Sleep in children with type 1 diabetes and their parents in the T1D Exchange

OBJECTIVES

Sleep has physiological and behavioral impacts on diabetes outcomes, yet little is known about the impact of sleep disturbances in children with type 1 diabetes. The current study sought to characterize sleep in children with type 1 diabetes and in their parents and to examine the associations between child sleep, glycemic control and adherence, parent sleep and well-being, parental fear of hypoglycemia, and nocturnal caregiving behavior.

METHODS

Surveys were emailed to parents of 2- to 12-year-old participants in the Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) Exchange clinic registry. Clinical data were obtained from the registry for the 515 respondents.

RESULTS

In our sample, 67% of children met criteria for poor sleep quality. Child sleep quality was related to glycemic control (HbA1c of 7.9% [63 mmol/mol] in children with poor sleep quality vs 7.6% [60 mmol/mol] in children with non-poor sleep quality; P < 0.001) but not mean frequency of blood glucose monitoring (BGM) (7.6 times/day vs 7.4 in poor/non-poor quality; P = 0.56). Associations were similar for sleep duration. Children with poor sleep quality were more likely to experience severe hypoglycemia (4% in children with poor sleep quality vs 1% in children with non-poor sleep quality; P = 0.05) and more likely to experience DKA (7% vs 4%, respectively; P < 0.001). Poorer child sleep quality was associated with poorer parental sleep quality, parental well-being, and fear of hypoglycemia (P < 0.001 for all). Child sleep was not related to the use of diabetes-related technology (CGM, insulin pump).

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep may be a modifiable factor to improve glycemic control and reduce parental distress.

Type 1 diabetes in very young children: a model of parent and child influences on management and outcomes

The incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in very young children (YC-T1D) is increasing globally. Managing YC-T1D is challenging from both a medical and psychosocial perspective during this vulnerable developmental period when complete dependence upon parental caretaking is normative and child behavior is unpredictable. The consequences of suboptimal glycemic control during this age range are substantial since these children will have T1D for many years and they are prone to adverse neuropsychological sequelae. Poor adaptation to T1D during these early years may engender a persistent trajectory of negative outcomes that can be very resistant to change. The empirical research on the YC-T1D population (age <6 yr) has indicated multiple mechanisms through which parent characteristics, parent coping skills, and child characteristics interact to yield a pattern of T1D management behaviors that affect T1D outcomes. However, this research has not yet led to a well-conceived conceptual model for identifying and understanding these mechanisms or for specifying research gaps and future research directions. The aim of this review is to propose such a conceptual model linking parent characteristics, parent coping, and child characteristics to T1D management behaviors and outcomes. This article reviews the literature focusing on research pertinent to YC-T1D and elements of our proposed model, identifies and discusses gaps in the literature, offers directions for future research, and considers a range of possible interventions targeting the unique needs of this special population.

Brief report: Sleep disturbances in young children with type 1 diabetes

This multi-method study, including actigraphy, sleep diaries, and questionnaires, indicated significant sleep disturbances in young children with type 1 diabetes (age 3-5) and insufficient sleep duration in children and their parents. Results provide initial support for sleep as a potential target to improve both diabetes outcomes and parental distress.

The Development of a Clinically Relevant Sleep Modification Protocol for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes

Findings from type 2 diabetes research indicate that sleep is both a predictor of onset and a correlate of disease progression. However, the role sleep plays in glucose regulation and daytime functioning in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has not been systematically investigated. Nonetheless, preliminary findings have supported that various sleep parameters are strongly correlated to health-related and neurobehavioral outcomes in youth with T1DM. This suggests that improving sleep might reduce morbidity. A critical step in developing evidence-based guidelines regarding sleep in diabetes management is to first determine that sleep modification in natural settings is possible (i.e., instructing youth to have a healthy sleep opportunity leads to more total sleep time) and that an increased sleep duration impacts disease and psychosocial outcomes in these youth. This article describes the background, design, and feasibility of an ongoing randomized clinical trial that aims to examine if increasing sleep relative to youth's own sleep routines affects glucose control and daytime functioning.

The Feasibility of a Pilot Intervention for Parents of Young Children Newly Diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and indicators of preliminary efficacy of the pilot of a parent-focused, phone-based intervention to improve glycemic control and parental and child well-being in young children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

Thirty mothers of young children ages 1-6 diagnosed with T1D for less than 6 months were randomized to either a phone-based intervention or physical activity education comparison program. Child HbA1c and parent report of depressive symptoms, stress, social support, and child quality of life were assessed at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months post intervention.

RESULTS

The program was feasible, as the majority of participants completed more than 80% of the intervention or comparison education sessions and reported high levels of satisfaction. Overall, there was a significant time by treatment intervention where the intervention group demonstrated improved social support and quality of life over time as compared to the comparison education group. The intervention demonstrated a trend towards moderating the association between baseline maternal depressive symptoms and prospective worsening of HbA1c.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents of young children newly diagnosed with T1D can be engaged in a phone-based program to provide support during this vulnerable period.

Mealtime behavior and diabetes-specific parent functioning in young children with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Management of meals and mealtime behavior is often challenging for parents of young children with Type 1 diabetes. Parent functioning related to diabetes care may directly affect mealtime behaviors and glycemic control. This study evaluated associations among diabetes-specific parent functioning, parent and child mealtime behaviors, and glycemic control.

METHOD

Parents of young children with Type 1 diabetes (n = 134) completed self-report measures assessing diabetes-specific functioning (hypoglycemia fear, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes-related quality of life) and child and parent mealtime behaviors. Hemoglobin A1c and percentage of blood glucose values out of range (<70 mg/dL or >200 mg/dL) over a 30-day period were abstracted from medical charts as indicators of glycemic control. Structural equation modeling was utilized to evaluate predictors and related outcomes of child and parent mealtime behavior.

RESULTS

The proposed model fit the data very well. More frequent problematic child mealtime behaviors were associated with poorer glycemic control; however, more frequent problematic parent mealtime behaviors were marginally associated with better glycemic control. Poorer diabetes-specific parent functioning was associated with more frequent problematic child and parent mealtime behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

Problematic child mealtime behaviors, such as disruptive behavior, present a significant risk for poorer glycemic control. Parents may engage in ineffective mealtime management strategies in an effort to meet glycemic recommendations and avoid hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Future research will help to determine whether parents may benefit from specific, developmentally appropriate behavioral strategies to manage meals and snacks and promote optimal diabetes management.

The diabetes online community: the importance of forum use in parents of children with type 1 diabetes

Online forums for chronic health conditions emerged as early as 30 yr ago and interest in their study has blossomed. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) forums have grown exponentially since 2005. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of these forums is needed. This study assesses the demographics and motivations of parents who use type 1 diabetes forums and the potential impact that forum membership (FM) has on parenting stress and hypoglycemic fear. One hundred and two parents were recruited through online T1D forums and asked to complete qualitative and quantitative measures of their experience with the T1D forums. Results of this study suggest that parents who use T1D forums mirror those who participate in clinic-based research protocols and are primarily motivated to participate in forums to increase their diabetes knowledge and gain social support. Indeed, parents who use T1D forums report high levels of trust, social support, and perceived knowledge gained. However, FM was positively related to increased self-reported parenting stress frequency and hypoglycemic fear behaviors. Taken together, the relationships formed within these communities may have a significant impact on the experience of these caregivers. The need for future research and potential implications for physicians, including parent debriefing, are discussed.

A pilot study of the association between sleep disturbance in children with liver transplants and parent and family health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between sleep disturbance in children with liver transplants and parent and family health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHOD

47 parents of children with liver transplants completed measures of child sleep and family HRQOL. Relationships between sleep and HRQOL and differences in HRQOL between groups with scores above and below the cutoff on a pediatric sleep measure were examined.

RESULTS

Parents endorsed higher rates of sleep-related breathing disorder (SRBD) and restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movements during sleep (RLS/PLMS) and lower HRQOL compared with published data. Significant correlations were found between SRBD and RLS/PLMS and HRQOL, and significant group differences in HRQOL were found between groups above and below the cutoff for behavior problems and RLS/PLMS.

CONCLUSION

There are significant relationships between symptoms of SRBD and RLS/PLMS in children with liver transplants and family HRQOL. Behavior problems may account for these strong relationships.

The impact of parents' sleep quality and hypoglycemia worry on diabetes self-efficacy

Parents of young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) may experience poor sleep quality, possibly impacting their confidence in T1D management. This study investigated sleep characteristics among parents of children with T1D and relationships among parents' sleep quality, hypoglycemia worry, and diabetes self-efficacy. As part of baseline assessment for a randomized clinical trial (RCT) to promote parental management of T1D, 134 parents of children ≤ age 6 reported on demographics, parent sleep characteristics, hypoglycemia worry, and diabetes self-efficacy. Parents reported they slept less time than recommended by the National Sleep Foundation and endorsed greater global sleep problems than standardized norms of healthy adults; one third of parents reported their overall sleep quality was "fairly bad" or "very bad." Hypoglycemia worry and parents' sleep quality were both significantly related to diabetes self-efficacy, but parents' sleep quality did not mediate the relationship of hypoglycemia worry and diabetes self-efficacy. Many parents experience disrupted sleep that impacts their perceived ability to perform T1D management. Interventions designed to improve parental T1D self-efficacy should consider sleep and concerns about children's hypoglycemia.

Young children with type 1 diabetes: challenges, research, and future directions

The incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in young children (age <6 years) is rising. Diabetes management guidelines offered by the American Diabetes Association and health care teams understandably place a high burden of responsibility on caregivers to check young children's blood glucose levels, administer insulin, and monitor diet and physical activity with the ultimate goal of maintaining tight glycemic control. Unfortunately, this tight control is needed during a vulnerable developmental period when behavior is unpredictable, T1D can be physiologically difficult to control, parenting stress can be elevated, and caregivers are strained by normal child caretaking routines. Despite the potentially different management needs, specific education and clinical services for managing diabetes in young children are rarely offered, and behavioral research with this young child age group has been limited in scope and quantity. Research findings pertinent to young children with T1D are reviewed, and potential clinical implications, as well as areas for future research, are discussed.