1
|
Langer J, Welch VL, Moran MM, Cane A, Lopez SMC, Srivastava A, Enstone A, Sears A, Markus K, Heuser M, Kewley R, Whittle I. The Cost of Seasonal Influenza: A Systematic Literature Review on the Humanistic and Economic Burden of Influenza in Older (≥ 65 Years Old) Adults. Adv Ther 2024; 41:945-966. [PMID: 38261171 PMCID: PMC10879238 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02770-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adults aged ≥ 65 years contribute a large proportion of influenza-related hospitalizations and deaths due to increased risk of complications, which result in high medical costs and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Although seasonal influenza vaccines are recommended for older adults, the effectiveness of current vaccines is dependent on several factors including strain matching and recipient demographic factors. This systemic literature review aimed to explore the economic and humanistic burden of influenza in adults aged ≥ 65 years. METHODS An electronic database search was conducted to identify studies assessing the economic and humanistic burden of influenza, including influenza symptoms that impact the HRQoL and patient-related outcomes in adults aged ≥ 65 years. Studies were to be published in English and conducted in Germany, France, Spain, and Italy, the UK, USA, Canada, China, Japan, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa. RESULTS Thirty-eight studies reported on the economic and humanistic burden of influenza in adults aged ≥ 65 years. Higher direct costs were reported for people at increased risk of influenza-related complications compared to those at low risk. Lower influenza-related total costs were found in those vaccinated with adjuvanted inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) compared to high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV-HD). Older age was associated with an increased occurrence and longer duration of certain influenza symptoms. CONCLUSION Despite the limited data identified, results show that influenza exerts a high humanistic and economic burden in older adults. Further research is required to confirm findings and to identify the unmet needs of current vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Langer
- Pfizer Patient & Health Impact, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Pfizer Portugal, Lagoas Park, Edifício 10, 2740-271, Porto Salvo, Portugal.
| | - Verna L Welch
- Pfizer Vaccines Medical & Scientific Affairs, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Mary M Moran
- Pfizer Vaccines Medical & Scientific Affairs, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Alejandro Cane
- Pfizer Vaccines Medical & Scientific Affairs, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | | | - Amit Srivastava
- Pfizer Emerging Markets, Vaccines Medical & Scientific Affairs, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Amy Sears
- Adelphi Values PROVE, Bollington, SK10 5JB, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ishak AR, Hsieh YC, Srinivasan H, See KC. Review of Vaccination Recommendations in Guidelines for Non-Communicable Diseases with Highest Global Disease Burden among Adults 75 Years Old and Above. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1076. [PMID: 37376465 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This scientific review paper explores international and country-specific healthcare guidelines for non-communicable diseases with the highest burden among individuals aged 75 years and above. The study aims to identify the best vaccination practices and standardize healthcare practices to improve vaccination adherence in this vulnerable population. Given that older people are more prone to infectious illnesses and have higher rates of morbidity and mortality, vaccinations are essential for disease prevention. Despite the proven efficacy of vaccinations, adherence has plateaued in recent years, partly due to a lack of accessibility, public education, and variability in disease-specific guidelines. This paper highlights the need for a more robust and standardized international vaccination model to improve quality of life and reduce disability-adjusted life years among the elderly. The findings of this study call for further research to review the guidelines as more implementations are put in place, including non-English guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Rahman Ishak
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Yu Chun Hsieh
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Harshitha Srinivasan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Kay Choong See
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vasileiou E, Sheikh A, Butler CC, Robertson C, Kavanagh K, Englishby T, Lone NI, von Wissmann B, McMenamin J, Ritchie LD, Schwarze J, Gunson R, Simpson CR. Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in People With Asthma: A National Test-Negative Design Case-Control Study. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:e94-e104. [PMID: 31688921 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz1086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza infection is a trigger of asthma attacks. Influenza vaccination can potentially reduce the incidence of influenza in people with asthma, but uptake remains persistently low, partially reflecting concerns about vaccine effectiveness (VE). METHODS We conducted a test-negative designed case-control study to estimate the effectiveness of influenza vaccine in people with asthma in Scotland over 6 seasons (2010/2011 to 2015/2016). We used individual patient-level data from 223 practices, which yielded 1 830 772 patient-years of data that were linked with virological (n = 5910 swabs) data. RESULTS Vaccination was associated with an overall 55.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.8-62.7) risk reduction of laboratory-confirmed influenza infections in people with asthma over 6 seasons. There were substantial variations in VE between seasons, influenza strains, and age groups. The highest VE (76.1%; 95% CI, 55.6-87.1) was found in the 2010/2011 season, when the A(H1N1) strain dominated and there was a good antigenic vaccine match. High protection was observed against the A(H1N1) (eg, 2010/2011; 70.7%; 95% CI, 32.5-87.3) and B strains (eg, 2010/2011; 83.2%; 95% CI, 44.3-94.9), but there was lower protection for the A(H3N2) strain (eg, 2014/2015; 26.4%; 95% CI, -12.0 to 51.6). The highest VE against all viral strains was observed in adults aged 18-54 years (57.0%; 95% CI, 42.3-68.0). CONCLUSIONS Influenza vaccination gave meaningful protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza in people with asthma across all seasons. Strategies to boost influenza vaccine uptake have the potential to substantially reduce influenza-triggered asthma attacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleftheria Vasileiou
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Chris C Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom and Cardiff University, Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Robertson
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom and Health Protection Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Kimberley Kavanagh
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Tanya Englishby
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Nazir I Lone
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Beatrix von Wissmann
- Health Protection Scotland, National Health Service (NHS) National Services Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jim McMenamin
- Health Protection Scotland, National Health Service (NHS) National Services Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Lewis D Ritchie
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Jürgen Schwarze
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Child Life and Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Rory Gunson
- West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Colin R Simpson
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- School of Health, Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand and Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu K, Li S, Qian ZM, Dharmage SC, Bloom MS, Heinrich J, Jalaludin B, Markevych I, Morawska L, Knibbs LD, Hinyard L, Xian H, Liu S, Lin S, Leskinen A, Komppula M, Jalava P, Roponen M, Hu LW, Zeng XW, Hu W, Chen G, Yang BY, Guo Y, Dong GH. Benefits of influenza vaccination on the associations between ambient air pollution and allergic respiratory diseases in children and adolescents: New insights from the Seven Northeastern Cities study in China. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2020; 256:113434. [PMID: 31672350 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little information exists on interaction effects between air pollution and influenza vaccination on allergic respiratory diseases. We conducted a large population-based study to evaluate the interaction effects between influenza vaccination and long-term exposure to ambient air pollution on allergic respiratory diseases in children and adolescents. METHODS A cross-sectional study was investigated during 2012-2013 in 94 schools from Seven Northeastern Cities (SNEC) in China. Questionnaires surveys were obtained from 56 137 children and adolescents aged 2-17 years. Influenza vaccination was defined as receipt of the influenza vaccine. We estimated air pollutants exposure [nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤1 μm (PM1), ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) and ≤10 μm (PM10)] using machine learning methods. We employed two-level generalized linear mix effects model to examine interactive effects between influenza vaccination and air pollution exposure on allergic respiratory diseases (asthma, asthma-related symptoms and allergic rhinitis), after controlling for important covariates. RESULTS We found statistically significant interactions between influenza vaccination and air pollutants on allergic respiratory diseases and related symptoms (doctor-diagnosed asthma, current wheeze, wheeze, persistent phlegm and allergic rhinitis). The adjusted ORs for doctor-diagnosed asthma, current wheeze and allergic rhinitis among the unvaccinated group per interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM1 and PM2.5 were significantly higher than the corresponding ORs among the vaccinated group [For PM1, doctor-diagnosed asthma: OR: 1.89 (95%CI: 1.57-2.27) vs 1.65 (95%CI: 1.36-2.00); current wheeze: OR: 1.50 (95%CI: 1.22-1.85) vs 1.10 (95%CI: 0.89-1.37); allergic rhinitis: OR: 1.38 (95%CI: 1.15-1.66) vs 1.21 (95%CI: 1.00-1.46). For PM2.5, doctor-diagnosed asthma: OR: 1.81 (95%CI: 1.52-2.14) vs 1.57 (95%CI: 1.32-1.88); current wheeze: OR: 1.46 (95%CI: 1.21-1.76) vs 1.11 (95%CI: 0.91-1.35); allergic rhinitis: OR: 1.35 (95%CI: 1.14-1.60) vs 1.19 (95%CI: 1.00-1.42)]. The similar patterns were observed for wheeze and persistent phlegm. The corresponding p values for interactions were less than 0.05, respectively. We assessed the risks of PM1-related and PM2.5-related current wheeze were decreased by 26.67% (95%CI: 1.04%-45.66%) and 23.97% (95%CI: 0.21%-42.08%) respectively, which was attributable to influenza vaccination (both p for efficiency <0.05). CONCLUSIONS Influenza vaccination may play an important role in mitigating the detrimental effects of long-term exposure to ambient air pollution on childhood allergic respiratory diseases. Policy targeted at increasing influenza vaccination may yield co-benefits in terms of reduced allergic respiratory diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangkang Liu
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental and Health risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Shanshan Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Zhengmin Min Qian
- Department of Epidemiology, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, 63104, USA
| | - Shyamali C Dharmage
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3052, Australia
| | - Michael S Bloom
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental and Health risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Department of Environmental Health Sciences and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY, 12144, USA
| | - Joachim Heinrich
- Institute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, 80336, Germany
| | - Bin Jalaludin
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Iana Markevych
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany; Division of Metabolic and Nutritional Medicine, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, 80336, Germany; Institute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, 80336, Germany
| | - Lidia Morawska
- International Laboratory for Air Quality & Health (ILAQH), Science and Engineering Faculty, Institute of Health Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4059, Australia
| | - Luke D Knibbs
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, 4006, Australia
| | - Leslie Hinyard
- Center for Health Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, 63104, USA
| | - Hong Xian
- Department of Epidemiology, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, 63104, USA
| | - Shan Liu
- NHC Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shao Lin
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY, 12144, USA
| | - Ari Leskinen
- Finnish Meteorological Institute, Kuopio, 70211, Finland; Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, 70211, Finland
| | - Mika Komppula
- Finnish Meteorological Institute, Kuopio, 70211, Finland
| | - Pasi Jalava
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, 70211, Finland
| | - Marjut Roponen
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, 70211, Finland
| | - Li-Wen Hu
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental and Health risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Xiao-Wen Zeng
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental and Health risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Wenbiao Hu
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4059, Australia
| | - Gongbo Chen
- Department of Global Health, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430000, China
| | - Bo-Yi Yang
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental and Health risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Yuming Guo
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Guang-Hui Dong
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental and Health risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shang M, Chung JR, Jackson ML, Jackson LA, Monto AS, Martin ET, Belongia EA, McLean HQ, Gaglani M, Murthy K, Zimmerman RK, Nowalk MP, Fry AM, Flannery B. Influenza vaccine effectiveness among patients with high-risk medical conditions in the United States, 2012-2016. Vaccine 2018; 36:8047-8053. [PMID: 30420119 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Revised: 10/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Annual influenza vaccination has been recommended for persons with high-risk conditions since the 1960s. However, few estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) for persons with high-risk conditions are available. METHODS Data from the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network from 2012 to 2016 were analyzed to compare VE of standard-dose inactivated vaccines against medically-attended influenza among patients aged ≥6 months with and without high-risk medical conditions. Patients with acute respiratory illness were tested for influenza by RT-PCR. Presence of high-risk conditions and vaccination status were obtained from medical records. VE by influenza virus type/subtype and age group was calculated for patients with and without high-risk conditions using the test-negative design. Interaction terms were used to test for differences in VE by high-risk conditions. RESULTS Overall, 9643 (38%) of 25,369 patients enrolled during four influenza seasons had high-risk conditions; 2213 (23%) tested positive for influenza infection. For all ages, VE against any influenza was lower among patients with high-risk conditions (41%, 95% CI: 35-47%) than those without (48%, 95% CI: 43-52%; P-for-interaction = 0.02). For children aged <18 years, VE against any influenza was 51% (95% CI: 39-61%) and 52% (95% CI: 39-61%) among those with and without high-risk conditions, respectively (P-for-interaction = 0.54). For adults aged ≥18 years, VE against any influenza was 38% (95% CI: 30-45%) and 44% (95% CI: 38-50%) among those with and without high-risk conditions, respectively (P-for-interaction = 0.21). For both children aged <18 and adults aged ≥18 years, VEs against illness related to influenza A(H3N2), A(H1N1)pdm09, and influenza B virus infection were similar among those with and without high-risk conditions. CONCLUSIONS Influenza vaccination provided protection against medically-attended influenza among patients with high-risk conditions, at levels approaching those observed among patients without high-risk conditions. Results from our analysis support recommendations of annual vaccination for patients with high-risk conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Shang
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, United States; Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, United States
| | - Jessie R Chung
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, United States
| | - Michael L Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States
| | - Lisa A Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States
| | - Arnold S Monto
- University of Michigan and Henry Ford Health System, United States
| | - Emily T Martin
- University of Michigan and Henry Ford Health System, United States
| | | | | | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Texas A&M University Health Science Center College of Medicine, United States
| | - Kempapura Murthy
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Texas A&M University Health Science Center College of Medicine, United States
| | - Richard K Zimmerman
- University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences and UPMC, United States
| | | | - Alicia M Fry
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, United States
| | - Brendan Flannery
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|