Knowledge, practice pattern and attitude toward asthma management amongst physicians from Nepal, Malaysia, Lebanon, Myanmar and Morocco

How do we manage asthma? Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice patterns among pulmonologists and allergists

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare knowledge, attitude, and practice patterns between pulmonologists and allergists for adult asthma in Turkey.Methods: Questionnaire-based data were gathered from 236 pulmonologists and 62 allergists, who had been members of the Turkish Thoracic Society and Turkish National Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in January-March 2021. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to determine the factors associated with primary reliever preferences.Results: Of the 298 physicians, 39% encountered at least five asthma patients daily. Spirometer was used frequently by both the allergists (82.3%) and pulmonologists (77.5%) for asthma diagnosis. Budesonide was the most preferred inhaler corticosteroid. Formoterol/budesonide was the most preferred ICS/LABA combination, followed by beclomethasone/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol for asthma treatment. For mild asthmatics, formoterol/ICS was the most preferred (72.6%) reliever among allergists, whereas salbutamol was the most preferred (66.1%) among pulmonologists (p < 0.001). Age and workplace were associated with salbutamol preference of doctors for mild asthmatics. Age, specialty, and patient examination time were significantly associated with salbutamol preference for severe asthmatics.Conclusions: The use of diagnostic tools, such as a spirometer, for asthma diagnosis was compatible with the guidelines. While recent updates of the guidelines indicate that salbutamol should not be used solely in mild asthmatics due to its harmful effects in long-term use, it still was the most preferred drug by pulmonologists. Postgraduate education programs are needed to improve compliance with the guidelines.

Nigerian doctors’ experiences of guideline-based asthma management: a qualitative study

Background

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) report sets out an updated evidence-based strategy for asthma management. Little is known about how this report is perceived and implemented in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nigeria. We explored the experiences of asthma management as informed by the current GINA guideline among doctors in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods

Using a qualitative research approach, in-depth interviews were conducted among doctors in Lagos, Nigeria to explore their experiences of asthma management in the context of the current GINA report. The thematic framework approach was used for data analysis.

Results

Eleven doctors aged 28-46 years (five general practitioners (GPs) and six family physicians (FPs) took part. Four overarching themes were identified: (i) knowledge of, and attitude towards the GINA strategy – whilst most doctors were aware of the existence of the GINA report, there was limited knowledge about its content including current recommendations for mild asthma treatment; (ii) asthma diagnosis and treatment – there was limited access to lung function testing facilities, and its role in asthma diagnosis was underappreciated; (iii) barriers to managing asthma according to GINA recommendations – these included complexity of the GINA report, unavailability and unaffordability of asthma medicines and poor patient adherence to medications, driven by socio-cultural factors; and (iv) enablers of GINA-recommended asthma management – improvement in asthma education for doctors and the general population and better access to diagnostic tests and medicines.

Conclusions

Whilst there was awareness of the existence of the GINA report, there was limited knowledge about its content and several barriers to its implementation were reported. Education about the GINA report, investment in diagnostic and treatment services and simplification of recommendations were identified as possible solutions.

How Do Pediatricians Diagnose Asthma in Tertiary Care Hospitals?

Objective: There is a lot of disparity in the guidelines and the practice of pediatricians globally for diagnosing asthma in children. To find out if pediatricians are diagnosing asthma in children according to best standard practices.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted at tertiary care hospitals' emergency and outpatient departments (OPDs). All the parents accompanying the asthmatic children to the emergency or outpatient departments of the tertiary care hospitals were asked questions regarding the diagnosis of their children's asthma on a prescribed performa. This performa had all the components of the best standard practices for the diagnosis of asthma in children. The data were entered into SPSS version 27 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and analyzed.

Results: Among the 234 children, the diagnosis of asthma was based on only one component out of three, i.e., recurrence (100%) of symptoms or signs. The objective measurement of the second component, i.e., reversibility with a peak flow meter (PFM) or spirometry, was assessed in only 6% of children. The third component, i.e., the presence of inflammation, was not assessed at all (0.0%).

Conclusions: The diagnosis of asthma in children lacks precision. This is far from the evidence-based best standard practices. There is a need to provide motivation, training, and equipment to the staff.

Physicians' Knowledge and Practices Regarding Asthma: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia

Objective

This study aimed to explore the characteristics of knowledge and practice of physicians towards asthma in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

An online cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia between 28 August and 10 November 2021. Convenience sampling technique was applied in this study through social media websites. Previously developed 10-items questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge about asthma among the participating physicians. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the participants’ demographic characteristics. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with being adherent to asthma practices guidelines.

Results

Overall, participants’ knowledge was moderate. The average percentage of physicians who reported practicing asthma management based on recommended guidelines 63.7%. Younger age (30–34 years) and having a work experience of (6–10 years) were significant predictors of being adherent to asthma practices guidelines (OR: 1.96 (95% CI: 1.21–3.17) (p=0.006) and OR: 1.67 (95% CI 1.05–2.67) (p=0.031), receptively).

Conclusion

This study showed that the percentage of physicians who reported practicing asthma management based on recommended guidelines in Saudi Arabia are moderate. Future studies to investigate factors associated with improvement in knowledge about asthma and adherence to guidelines are needed.