Validation of the Hospital Asthma Severity Score (HASS) in children ages 2-18 years old

Pre-school wheeze hospital presentations: A demographic profile and review of clinical management

AIM

Pre-school wheeze is a common hospital presentation in Australasia. The aim of this study was to describe the regional hospital presentation and cost of pre-school wheeze.

METHODS

Audit of children diagnosed with pre-school wheeze at two hospitals in Auckland, New Zealand from October 2017 to September 2019. Guideline adherence was determined.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-two children made 247 pre-school wheeze hospital presentations. Pre-school wheeze accounted for a larger proportion of acute hospital presentations for Māori versus non-Māori children (rate ratio 1.76, 95% confidence intervals 1.32-2.31). Hospital representations with pre-school wheeze occurred in 38/192 (20%) children. The proportion with a pre-school wheeze representation was larger for Māori than non-Māori (30% vs. 16%, P = 0.02). Pre-school wheeze event median length of stay increased as household deprivation increased (P = 0.01). Clinical severity of 247 pre-school wheeze episodes was mild (n = 64, 26%), moderate (n = 153, 62%) and severe (n = 30, 12%). Of 244 episodes, inhaled bronchodilators only were given for 149 (61%), oxygen for 54 (22%) and intravenous treatment for 41 (17%). Hospital guideline use was evident in 164/247 (66%) episodes. Neither clinical severity nor treatment intensity varied with child sex, age or ethnicity or household deprivation. The estimated median (interquartile range) direct medical costs of each pre-school wheeze episode were NZ$1279 (NZ$774-2158).

CONCLUSIONS

In Auckland, pre-school wheeze accounts for a larger proportion of acute hospital presentations for Māori compared with non-Māori and Māori children have increased odds of pre-school wheeze readmissions. Length of hospital stay for pre-school wheeze episodes increased with household deprivation. In this audit pre-school wheeze guideline adherence was poor.

The Buddhasothorn Asthma Severity Score (BASS): A practical screening tool for predicting severe asthma exacerbations for pediatric patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A precise scaling system of acute asthma leads to an accurate assessment of disease severity. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the Buddhasothorn Asthma Severity Score (BASS) with the Wood-Downes-Ferrés Scale (WDFS) to recognize the severity level of acute asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted comprising Thai children aged 2-15 years with acute asthma. The BASS and WFDS were rated once in the emergency department. The degree of severity was determined by frequency and type of nebulized bronchodilator administrations at the time of initial treatment. The optimum cutoff points for the area under the curve (AUC) were established to predict severe asthma exacerbations.

RESULTS

All 73 episodes of asthma exacerbations (EAEs) in 35 participants were analyzed. Fifty-nine (80.8%) EAEs were classified as severe. Both scales had good significance to recognize the selection of nebulized bronchodilator treatments by AUC of 0.815 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.680-0.950) in case of BASS, and AUC of 0.822 (95% CI: 0.70-0.944) in case of WDFS. Cutoff points of BASS ≥ 8 had sensitivity 72.9%, specificity 64.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) 89.6%, negative predictive value (NPV) 36.0% at an AUC of 0.718 (95% CI: 0.563-0.873) for severe exacerbations. These results were consistent for cutoff points of WDFS ≥ 5 with sensitivity 78.0%, specificity 50.0%, PPV 86.8%, NPV 35.0% at an AUC of 0.768 (95% CI: 0.650-0.886) for predicting severe exacerbations. There was no significant difference between the AUCs of both scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the BASS and WDFS were good and accurate scales and effective screening tools for predicting severe asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients by optimal cutoff points.

A pediatric hospital-wide asthma severity score: Reliability and effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalization in the United States. Children hospitalized with asthma are often managed in different care settings during hospitalization, posing challenges to accurate communication among care providers about illness severity. Our objective was to study the feasibility, reliability, and safety of a new pediatric hospital-wide asthma severity score (HASS) across different care units within a single tertiary-care pediatric center.

METHODS

150 patients between the ages of 2 and 18 years hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of status asthmaticus were included in this study. Study patients were followed from the time of initial triage in the emergency department until the time of medical readiness for discharge. Rates of medical errors, early transfers to a higher level of care and medically indicated hospital length of stay (LOS) were compared between 75 patients before and 75 patients after widespread implementation of the HASS using retrospective chart review and anonymous staff reporting. Interrater reliability was determined by collecting independent HASS scores from blinded staff members after tandem or simultaneous patient assessment.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability among untrained staff members using the HASS was high. Hospital LOS, rates of adverse events, medical errors, and early transfer to a higher level of care were not significantly different before and after widespread HASS implementation.

CONCLUSION

The HASS is a reliable asthma severity tool that can be used throughout hospitalization and among multiple clinical providers to trend clinical progress and optimize communication, particularly during times of care handoffs.

The Clinical Respiratory Score: investigating the reliability of an asthma scoring tool across a multidisciplinary team

BACKGROUND

Asthma scoring tools are used by emergency department (ED) teams to communicate severity of illness. Although most have been validated, none has been found to be sufficiently valid to allow for use across a multidisciplinary team managing pediatric asthma exacerbations.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Clinical Respiratory Score (CRS) among all members of an ED care team.

DESIGN/METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of children aged 2 to 18 years presenting with an acute asthma exacerbation to an urban pediatric ED over a 2-year period. We determined reliability using two CRS measurements independently documented by two separate providers, 15 min apart. An inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to determine overall reliability among users. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine reliability between types of providers and the six components of the CRS.

RESULTS

A total of 9,749 patient encounters were identified and 1,562 (16%) met our inclusion criteria. The majority of score pairings (n = 1096, 70.2%) were documented by a registered nurse followed by a respiratory therapist. The overall reliability of the CRS, when documented by two providers, was acceptable with an ICC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74-0.78, p < 0.001). Removing CRS components with the lowest agreement did not affect the overall ICC when re-calculated.

CONCLUSION(S)

The CRS is a reliable asthma severity scoring tool for pediatric patients presenting with an acute asthma exacerbation when utilized across care team members. Simplifying the CRS by removing the color and mental status components did not affect its reliability.