Incidence of adverse events after I.V injection of MR contrast agents in a Chinese population. A comparison between gadopentetate and gadodiamide

Application of magnetic resonance urography in diagnosis of congenital urogenital anomalies in children

Magnetic resonance urography (MRU) has become a useful adjuvant in evaluating urogenital anomalies. In present study, we evaluated the ability of MRU in diagnosis of different congenital urogenital anomalies when the results of conventional imaging modalities were inconclusive. A total of 90 children were included in this series. The children were evaluated with T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRU sequences. The results were compared with findings obtained with ultrasonography, intravenous urography, renal nuclide scan, and voiding cystourethrography. MRU was requested in these children because conventional imaging modalities were equivocal or a co-existing urogenital anomaly was suspected. Only those cases that underwent surgery were included in this study and the surgical findings were set as the reference standard in statistical evaluation. The records of 61 boys with mean (range) age of 2.3 years (2 months-12 years) and 29 girls with mean (range) age of 3.3 years (3 months-12 years) were reviewed. The final diagnosis was ureteropelvic junction obstruction (n = 25), vesicoureteral junction obstruction (n = 16), ureterocele (n = 19), ectopic kidney (n = 11), posterior urethral valve (n = 17), and polycystic kidney (n = 2). The overall sensitivity of MRU, intravenous urography, renal nuclide scan, ultrasonography, and voiding cystourethrography in diagnosis of the aforementioned anomalies were 86, 63, 50, 44, and 41%, respectively. MRU was much more sensitive than other imaging modalities in diagnosis of end-ureteral dilation (100%) and ureterocele (89%). MRU provides a reliable noninvasive technique for imaging of the congenital anomalies in the urinary tract of children with T2-weighted MRU sequences providing unenhanced static-water images of the urinary tract as well as depicting adjacent soft-tissue lesions, and T1-weighted MRU technique imitating conventional intravenous urography. Both MRU sequences can be combined for a comprehensive examination of the urinary tract.

Use of gadolinium contrast adrenal venography for the assessment of primary aldosteronism in a patient with iodine allergy

Primary aldosteronism is a relatively common cause of secondary hypertension. It is often important to diagnose this disease accurately, since appropriate surgical therapy may result in cure of the disease. Assessment of the laterality of adrenal hyperfunction is possible using adrenal venous sampling of steroid hormones, but this procedure may not be feasible in patients with allergy to iodinated radiocontrast agents. In this paper, we report a patient with primary aldosteronism who was found to have bilateral adrenal tumors on CT. Because preoperative localization of the hyperfunctioning tumor was important, adrenal venous sampling and venography was performed by a highly-experienced radiologist using the MRI contrast agent gadolinium. After reviewing the data, the patient received a right adrenalectomy. This case report demonstrates that it was possible to perform adrenal venography using gadolinium in this patient, however the safety and efficacy should be re-assessed in individual cases.

Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance urography for assessing drainage in dilated pelvicalyceal systems with moderate renal function: preliminary results and comparison with diuresis renography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of dynamic gadolinium diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid (DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance urography (Gd-MRU) for assessing kidneys with markedly dilated pelvicalyceal systems and impaired function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight children (mean age 30 months, sd 25) were assessed, diagnosed as having gross unilateral hydronephrosis with a mean (sd) anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter of 36 (7) mm and reduced (30-40%) renal function. Dynamic Gd-MRU was performed after the patients were pre-loaded with intravenous fluid and diuretics, and comprised a dynamic T1-weighted sequence after Gd-DTPA (0.1 mmol/kg body weight) was administered, with a time-intensity curve of each kidney produced. Drainage was diagnosed by a clearly declining time-intensity curve and direct visualization of contrast medium within the ureter in several frames. High-grade or complete obstruction was diagnosed when drainage of contrast medium could not be detected. Gd-MRU results were compared with diuresis radionuclide (mercapto-acetyltriglycine, MAG3) renography within the same week. Unobstructive units detected by Gd-MRU were treated conservatively with a close follow-up by ultrasonography and radionuclide studies.

RESULTS

Diuresis MAG3 renography showed drainage in three dilated units and poor washout in five; in contrast, Gd-MRU showed drainage in seven dilated systems (three showed poor washout by MAG3), and obstruction in the remaining case. The unobstructed units detected by MRU under conservative treatment thus showed no further deterioration of renal function or progressive hydronephrosis in the subsequent follow-up (mean 18 months, range 15-23).

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that dynamic Gd-MRU is a useful noninvasive imaging method in distinguishing obstructive from unobstructive dilated systems, particularly in patients with hydronephrosis and reduced renal function.