Pretreatment late-phase DCE-MRI predicts outcome in locally advanced cervix cancer

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Cervical Cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Treatment with chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy achieves high local control, but recurrence with metastatic disease impacts survival. This highlights the need for predictive and prognostic biomarkers identifying populations at risk of poorer treatment response and survival. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely used in cervical cancer and is a potential source for biomarkers. Functional MRI (fMRI) can characterise tumour beyond anatomical MRI, which is limited to the assessment of morphology. This review summarises fMRI techniques used in cervical cancer and examines the role of fMRI parameters as predictive or prognostic biomarkers. Different techniques characterise different tumour factors, which helps to explain the variation in patient outcomes. These can impact simultaneously on outcomes, making biomarker identification challenging. Most studies are small, focussing on single MRI techniques, which raises the need to investigate combined fMRI approaches for a more holistic characterisation of tumour.

The Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Uterine Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review

Correct staging of cervical cancer is essential to establish the best therapeutic procedure and prognosis for the patient. MRI is the best imaging modality for local staging and follow-up. According to the latest ESUR guidelines, T2WI and DWI-MR sequences are fundamental in these settings, and CE-MRI remains optional. This systematic review, according to the PRISMA 2020 checklist, aims to give an overview of the literature regarding the use of contrast in MRI in cervical cancer and provide more specific indications of when it may be helpful. Systematic searches on PubMed and Web Of Science (WOS) were performed, and 97 papers were included; 1 paper was added considering the references of included articles. From our literature review, it emerged that many papers about the use of contrast in cervical cancer are dated, especially about staging and detection of tumor recurrence. We did not find strong evidence suggesting that CE-MRI is helpful in any clinical setting for cervical cancer staging and detection of tumor recurrence. There is growing evidence that perfusion parameters and perfusion-derived radiomics models might have a role as prognostic and predictive biomarkers, but the lack of standardization and validation limits their use in a research setting.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based texture analysis for the prediction of postoperative clinical outcome in uterine cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based texture analysis (MRTA) is a novel image analysis tool that offers objective information about the spatial arrangement of MRI signal intensity. We aimed to investigate the value of MRTA in predicting the postoperative clinical outcome of patients with uterine cervical cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 115 patients with surgically proven cervical cancer who underwent preoperative pelvic 3T-MRI, and MRTA was performed on T2-weighted images (T2), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1). Filtration histogram-based texture analysis was used to generate six first-order statistical parameters [mean intensity, standard deviation (SD), mean of positive pixels (MPP), entropy, skewness, and kurtosis] at five spatial scaling factors (SSFs, 2-6 mm) as well as from unfiltered images. Cox proportional hazard models and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to evaluate the associations between parameters and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 36 months, tumor recurrence was found in 26 patients (22.6%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CE-T1 MPP and T2 kurtosis at SSF3-5, CE-T1 MPP at SSF6, and CE-T1 SD at unfiltered images were independent predictors of RFS (p < 0.05). Regarding the 2-year RFS for CE-T1 MPP and T2 kurtosis at SSF5, and CE-T1 MPP at SSF6, patients with > optimal cutoff values demonstrated significantly worse survival than those with ≤ optimal cutoff values (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MRTA may be useful for predicting postoperative outcome in patients with cervical cancer.

Identification of Tumor-Specific MRI Biomarkers Using Machine Learning (ML)

The identification of reliable and non-invasive oncology biomarkers remains a main priority in healthcare. There are only a few biomarkers that have been approved as diagnostic for cancer. The most frequently used cancer biomarkers are derived from either biological materials or imaging data. Most cancer biomarkers suffer from a lack of high specificity. However, the latest advancements in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the identification of highly predictive, disease-specific biomarkers. Such biomarkers can be used to diagnose cancer patients, to predict cancer prognosis, or even to predict treatment efficacy. Herein, we provide a summary of the current status of developing and applying Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers in cancer care. We focus on all aspects of MRI biomarkers, starting from MRI data collection, preprocessing and machine learning methods, and ending with summarizing the types of existing biomarkers and their clinical applications in different cancer types.

DCE-MRI of locally-advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Tofts analysis versus non-model-based analyses

BACKGROUND

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) may provide biomarkers of the outcome of locally-advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC). There is, however, no agreement on how DCE-MR recordings should be analyzed. Previously, we have analyzed DCE-MRI data of LACC using non-model-based strategies. In the current study, we analyzed DCE-MRI data of LACC using the Tofts pharmacokinetic model, and the biomarkers derived from this analysis were compared with those derived from the non-model-based analyses.

METHODS

Eighty LACC patients given cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy with curative intent were included in the study. Treatment outcome was recorded as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). DCE-MRI series were analyzed voxelwise to produce K^trans and v_e frequency distributions, and ROC analysis was used to identify the parameters of the frequency distributions having the greatest potential as biomarkers. The prognostic power of these parameters was compared with that of the non-model-based parameters LETV (low-enhancing tumor volume) and TVIS (tumor volume with increasing signal).

RESULTS

Poor DFS and OS were associated with low values of K^trans, whereas there was no association between treatment outcome and v_e. The K^trans parameters having the greatest prognostic value were p35-K^trans (the K^trans value at the 35 percentile of a frequency distribution) and RV-K^trans (the tumor subvolume with K^trans values below 0.13 min^- 1). Multivariate analysis including clinical parameters and p35-K^trans or RV-K^trans revealed that RV-K^trans was the only independent prognostic factor of DFS and OS. There were significant correlations between RV-K^trans and LETV and between RV-K^trans and TVIS, and the prognostic power of RV-K^trans was similar to that of LETV and TVIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarkers of the outcome of LACC can be provided by analyzing DCE-MRI series using the Tofts pharmacokinetic model. However, these biomarkers do not appear to have greater prognostic value than biomarkers determined by non-model-based analyses.

Validated imaging biomarkers as decision-making tools in clinical trials and routine practice: current status and recommendations from the EIBALL* subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Observer-driven pattern recognition is the standard for interpretation of medical images. To achieve global parity in interpretation, semi-quantitative scoring systems have been developed based on observer assessments; these are widely used in scoring coronary artery disease, the arthritides and neurological conditions and for indicating the likelihood of malignancy. However, in an era of machine learning and artificial intelligence, it is increasingly desirable that we extract quantitative biomarkers from medical images that inform on disease detection, characterisation, monitoring and assessment of response to treatment. Quantitation has the potential to provide objective decision-support tools in the management pathway of patients. Despite this, the quantitative potential of imaging remains under-exploited because of variability of the measurement, lack of harmonised systems for data acquisition and analysis, and crucially, a paucity of evidence on how such quantitation potentially affects clinical decision-making and patient outcome. This article reviews the current evidence for the use of semi-quantitative and quantitative biomarkers in clinical settings at various stages of the disease pathway including diagnosis, staging and prognosis, as well as predicting and detecting treatment response. It critically appraises current practice and sets out recommendations for using imaging objectively to drive patient management decisions.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data of locally advanced cervical carcinoma with the Brix model

Background: There is significant evidence that DCE-MRI may have the potential to provide clinically useful biomarkers of the outcome of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. However, there is no consensus on how to analyze DCE-MRI data to arrive at the most powerful biomarkers. The purpose of this study was to analyze DCE-MRI data of cervical cancer patients by using the Brix pharmacokinetic model and to compare the biomarkers derived from the Brix analysis with biomarkers determined by non-model-based analysis [i.e., low-enhancing tumor volume (LETV) and tumor volume with increasing signal (TVIS)] of the same patient cohort. Material and methods: DCE-MRI recordings of 80 patients (FIGO stage IB-IVA) treated with concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy were analyzed voxel-by-voxel, and frequency distributions of the three parameters of the Brix model (A_Brix, k_ep, and k_el) were determined. Moreover, risk volumes were calculated from the Brix parameters and termed RV-A_Brix, RV-k_ep, and RV-k_el, where the RVs represent the tumor volume with voxel values below a threshold value determined by ROC analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were used as measures of treatment outcome. Results: Significant associations between the median value or any other percentile value of A_Brix, k_ep, or k_el and treatment outcome were not found. However, RV-A_Brix, RV-k_ep, and RV-k_el correlated with DFS and OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that the prognostic power of RV-A_Brix, RV-k_ep, and RV-k_el was independent of well-established clinical prognostic factors. RV-A_Brix, RV-k_ep, and RV-k_el correlated with each other as well as with LETV and TVIS. Conclusion: Strong biomarkers of the outcome of locally advanced cervical carcinoma can be provided by subjecting DCE-MRI series to pharmacokinetic analysis using the Brix model. The prognostic power of these biomarkers is not necessarily superior to that of biomarkers identified by non-model-based analyses.