Management of pathologic node-positive disease following initial surgery for clinical T1-2 N0 esophageal cancer: patterns of care and outcomes from the national cancer data base

A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial of adjuvant sintilimab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

No adjuvant treatment has been established for patients who remain at high risk of recurrence and incidental pathologic lymph node metastasis for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this open-label, multicenter, phase III, randomized controlled trial, ESCC patients who did not achieve pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery and clinical T1-2 N0 patients with incidental pathologic lymph node metastasis following initial surgery were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to receive either a sintilimab regimen or observational management (NCT05495152). The primary end point was disease-free survival for all randomized patients. The results of this randomized controlled trial addressed controversy regarding the survival benefits of adjuvant sintilimab treatment for patients with resected locally advanced ESCC. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05495152 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Lymph Node Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus: From the Results of NEOCRTEC5010, a Randomized Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic impact of pathologic lymph node (LN) status and investigate risk factors of recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

There are no large-scale prospective study data regarding ypN status and recurrence after pCR in ESCC patients receiving NCRT.

METHODS

The NEOCRTEC5010 trial was a prospective multicenter trial that compared the survival and safety of NCRT plus surgery (S) with S in patients with locally advanced ESCC. The relationships between survival and cN, pN, and ypN status were assessed. Potential prognostic factors in patients with ypN+ and pCR were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 389 ESCC patients (NCRT: 182; S: 207) were included. Patients with pN+ in the S group and ypN+ in the NCRT group had decreased overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with pN0 and ypN0 patients, respectively. Partial response at the primary site [hazard ratio (HR), 2.09] and stable disease in the LNs (HR, 3.26) were independent risk factors for lower DFS, but not OS. For patients with pCR, the recurrence rate was 13.9%. Patients with distant LN metastasis had a median OS and DFS of 16.1 months and 14.4 months, respectively. Failure to achieve the median total dose of chemotherapy was a significant risk factor of recurrence and metastasis after pCR (HR, 44.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent pathologic LN metastasis after NCRT is a strong poor prognostic factor in ESCC. Additionally, pCR does not guarantee a cure; patients with pCR should undergo an active strategy of surveillance and adjuvant therapy.

Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients Not Meeting Age-based Criteria of the CROSS Trial

OBJECTIVES

The CROSS trial established neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT-S) as superior to surgery alone (S) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). However, because patients above 75 years of age were excluded, this comparison cannot be extrapolated to older patients. This study of a large, contemporary national database evaluated practice patterns in elderly patients ineligible for CROSS, and analyzed overall survival (OS) between nCRT+S, S, and definitive CRT (dCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for EC patients with cT1N1M0/T2-3N0-1M0 EC (per the CROSS trial) but 76 years and above of age. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with nCRT+S (vs. S). Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated OS; Cox multivariate analysis determined variables associated with OS. Propensity matching aimed to address group imbalances and indication biases.

RESULTS

Of 4099 total patients, 594 (14%) underwent nCRT+S, 494 (12%) underwent S, and 3011 (73%) underwent dCRT. Since 2010, trimodality management has risen, corresponding to declines in S and dCRT. Median OS in the respective groups were 26.7, 20.3, and 17.8 months (P<0.05). Following propensity matching, there was a trend towards higher OS with nCRT-S over S (P=0.077); dCRT showed poorer OS than nCRT-S (P<0.001) but was equivalent to S (P=0.669). Before and following matching, nCRT-S experienced equivalent 30- and 90-day mortality as S (P>0.05), with lower 30-day readmission and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most older patients not meeting CROSS criteria undergo dCRT, utilization of trimodality therapy is rising. Despite the trend towards higher OS with trimodality therapy without poorer postoperative outcomes, careful patient selection continues to be essential in this population.

Management of Unresectable T4b Esophageal Cancer: Practice Patterns and Outcomes From the National Cancer Data Base

PURPOSE

Patients with unresectable cT4b esophageal cancer (EC) are rare and largely excluded from prospective trials. As a result, current treatment recommendations are based on limited evidence. This study sought to evaluate national practice patterns and outcomes for this population and evaluated 3 primary cohorts: patients receiving chemotherapy (CT) with or without subtherapeutic radiotherapy (RT), definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), or CT with or without RT followed by definitive surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cT4b Nany M0 EC. Exclusion criteria were patients with unspecified staging, palliative treatment, improper, or no histologic confirmation, or lack of CT. Multivariable logistic regression determined factors predictive of receiving surgical therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS.

RESULTS

Altogether, 519 patients met inclusion criteria; 195 (38%) underwent CT, 291 (56%) underwent definitive CRT, and 33 (6%) underwent surgical-based therapy. Surgery was more likely performed in patients residing in rural areas, living farther from the treating facility, and N1 status (P<0.05 for all). Median OS in the respective cohorts were 6.0, 12.7, and 43.9 months (P<0.001). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling, among others, nonsurgical treatment was associated with poorer OS (P<0.05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest study to date evaluating patterns of care for cT4b EC, as compared with CT alone, addition of definitive RT was associated with higher OS. Although causation is clearly not implied, well-selected responders to CT and/or RT may be able to undergo resection and numerically prolonged survival, but patient selection remains paramount.

Comparison of outcomes between metaplastic and triple-negative breast cancer patients

Purpose

Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare, aggressive variant of breast cancer that has been associated with poor clinical outcomes, as has triple-negative breast (TNBC) cancer. Limited studies compare the clinical characteristics and prognosis of MBC to TNBC. This study uses a large, contemporary US cancer database to compare clinical characteristics and survival outcomes for patients with MBC to those with TNBC.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried for women with cT1-4N1-3M0 MBC or TNBC diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 and treated with definitive surgery. Chi-squared analysis was performed to determine differences between the cohorts. Kaplan-Meier curves compared overall survival (OS), and Cox regression determined patient factors associated with OS.

Results

Altogether, 55,847 patients met the inclusion criteria; 50,705 (90.8%) had TNBC and 5,142 (9.2%) had MBC. Most patients had no comorbid conditions (82%), N0 disease (71%), poorly differentiated histology (77%), received chemotherapy (87%), and received radiation therapy (60%). Amongst all patients, patients with TNBC disease were observed to have greater OS than those with MBC (5-year OS 72.0% vs 55.8%, p < 0.001). The greater observed OS for patients with TNBC persisted when controlling for stage and when comparing propensity score matched cohorts. On Cox regression, lower age, T1 status, N0 status, chemotherapy, TNBC disease, and radiation therapy (RT) were associated with improved OS.

Conclusions

MBC had an association with poorer OS compared to TNBC, while RT and chemotherapy receipt were associated with improved OS for patients regardless of stage. Further studies are needed to corroborate the conclusions herein.

•

Metaplastic breast cancer is associated with poor clinical outcomes.

•

Metaplastic breast cancer associated with worse survival than patients with triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma.

•

Radiation therapy and chemotherapy associated with improved survival for patients with metaplastic breast cancer.

Omission of radiation therapy following breast conservation in older (≥70 years) women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although randomized data support omitting adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following breast conservation for T1-2N0 estrogen receptor positive breast cancer in ≥70-year-old women, there remains a knowledge gap regarding its omission for triple-negative BC (TNBC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for ≥70-year-old females with newly diagnosed T1-2N0M0 TNBC treated with breast conservation. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with adjuvant RT administration. Overall survival (OS) between patients treated with or without adjuvant RT was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS.

RESULTS

Of 8526 patients, 6283 (74%) patients received adjuvant RT, and 2243 (26%) did not. RT was more frequently withheld in older patients, those with higher comorbidities, lower income, pT2 disease, following margin-positive resection, receipt of chemotherapy, and at academic centers (P < 0.05 for all). Median follow-up was 38.0 months. Five-year OS was greater in the adjuvant RT group (77.2% vs 55.3%, P < 0.001); these differences persisted when stratifying for age, T stage, and chemotherapy utilization (P < 0.001 for all). Omission of RT was also independently associated with poorer OS on multivariate analysis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation, the largest known such study to date, observed that omission of adjuvant RT for elderly women with T1-2N0 TNBC was associated with poorer OS; this was observed across a range of age groups, as well as following stratification by T stage and chemotherapy usage. Although these results do not imply causation, caution must be exercised when considering omission of adjuvant RT in node-negative TNBC patients.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer: practice patterns and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Up-front stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been historically thought of as inadequate for brain metastases (BM) from newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study evaluates national practice patterns and clinical outcomes for BM from SCLC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2013) for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic SCLC receiving intracranial radiotherapy. Patients were grouped into three categories: upfront SRS, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone, or WBRT with boost (SRS or fractionated radiotherapy). Statistics included temporal trend assessment by annual percent change (APC), logistic regression, exploratory Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis without and with propensity matching, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 14,722 patients met selection criteria, of whom 487 (3.3%), 13,657 (92.8%), and 578 (3.9%) received upfront SRS, WBRT and WBRT with boost, respectively. Utilization of SRS showed a slight increasing trend from 2004 to 2013 (2.7-4.3%). In addition to socioeconomic factors, other variables associated with SRS use included diagnosis after 2010, treatment at academic centers, and residing in higher-educated regions. SRS was less often delivered to patients with node-positive disease (p < .05). On exploratory analysis, SRS cohort was observed to have a higher overall survival (OS) than WBRT-based groups (p < .001), namely in patients without extracranial metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of up-front SRS for SCLC BM has been increasing over time but is driven by socioeconomic disparities. Although there are likely numerous biases associated with the OS findings herein, further research is needed to validate this finding as well as the role of SRS on patients with brain metastases due to SCLC.

National Cancer Database report of nonmetastatic esophageal small cell carcinoma

Background

Esophageal small cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a rare malignancy for which there is no consensus management approach. This is the largest known analysis of nonmetastatic ESCC patients to date, evaluating national practice patterns and outcomes of surgical‐based therapy vs chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs chemotherapy alone.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for esophageal cancer patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic ESCC. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with receipt of surgical‐based management. Kaplan‐Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) and the log‐rank test is used to compare OS between groups; Cox univariate and multivariate analyses determined variables associated with OS.

Results

Altogether, 323 patients were analyzed; 64 (20%) patients underwent surgical‐based therapy, 211 (65%) CRT, and 48 (15%) chemotherapy alone. On multivariable analysis, no single factor significantly predicted for administration of surgery. Despite no OS differences between the surgery‐based (median OS 21 months) and CRT arms (18 months), both were superior to CT alone (10 months) (P < 0.001). Among other factors, receiving any local therapy independently predicted for higher OS over chemotherapy alone on Cox multivariate analysis (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study of a large, contemporary national database demonstrates that most ESCC is treated with CRT in the United States; adding local therapy to systemic therapy may be beneficial to these patients, although individualized multidisciplinary management is still recommended.

Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: practice patterns and outcomes from the national cancer data base

Background

Current guidelines recommend chemotherapy (CT) with or without radiotherapy (RT) for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IC). Although there is currently lack of consensus, previous smaller studies have illustrated the efficacy of local therapy for this population. This investigation evaluated outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CT alone in unresected IC using a large, contemporary national database.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for primary IC cases (2004-2013) receiving CT alone or CRT. Patients undergoing resection or not receiving CT were excluded, as were those with M1 disease or unknown M classification. Logistic regression analysis ascertained factors associated with CRT administration. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between both groups. Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed variables associated with OS.

Results

In total, 2,842 patients were analyzed [n=666 (23%) CRT, n=2,176 (77%) CT]. CRT was less likely delivered at community centers, in more recent time periods (2009-2013), to older patients, and in certain geographic locations. Median OS in the CRT and CT groups were 13.6 vs. 10.5 months, respectively (P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, poorer OS was associated with age, male gender, increased comorbidities, treatment at a community center, and treatment at earlier time periods (2004-2008) (P<0.05 for all). Notably, receipt of CRT independently predicted for improved OS (P<0.001).

Conclusions

As compared to CT alone, CRT was independently associated with improved survival in unresected IC. These findings support a randomized trial evaluating this question that is currently accruing.

Response rates and pathologic complete response by breast cancer molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

This is the largest study to date evaluating response rates and pathologic complete response (pCR) and predictors thereof, based on molecular subtype, in women with breast cancer having undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC).

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for women with cT1-4N1-3M0 breast cancer having received NC. Patients were divided into four subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, Her2, or triple negative (TN). Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with developing pCR. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between patients by degree of response to NC when stratifying patients by subtype.

RESULTS

Of a total of 13,939 women, 322 (2%) were luminal A, 5941 (43%) luminal B, 2274 (16%) Her2, and 5402 (39%) TN. Overall, 19% of all patients achieved pCR, the lowest in luminal A (0.3%) and the highest in Her2 (38.7%). Molecular subtype was an independent predictor of both pCR and OS in this population. Clinical downstaging was associated with improved survival, mostly in women with luminal B, Her2, and TN subtypes. Subgroup analysis of the pCR population demonstrated 5-year OS in the luminal B, Her2, and TN cohorts of 93.0, 94.2, and 90.6%, respectively (Her2 vs. TN, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing nearly 14,000 women from a contemporary United States database, this is the largest known study examining the relationship between response to NC and molecular subtype. Women with luminal A disease are the least likely to undergo pCR, with the highest rates in Her2 disease. Degree of response is associated with OS, especially in luminal B, Her2, and TN patients. Despite the comparatively higher likelihood of achieving pCR in TN cases, this subgroup may still experience a survival detriment, which has implications for an ongoing national randomized trial.