1
|
Van Werkhoven LA, Cammareri E, Hoogeman MS, Nout RA, Milder MTW, Nuyttens JJME. Stereotactic body radiation therapy on abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases: a systematic review on toxicity. Acta Oncol 2024; 63:822-832. [PMID: 39473177 PMCID: PMC11541805 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.40681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 10/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To review available data on toxicity during and/or after treatment of abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases (A-P LN) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to provide an overview of adverse events and its relation to dose or fractionation. MATERIAL AND METHODS For this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAH for studies published between the database inception and October 3rd, 2023. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with 1-5 A-P LN oligometastases, (2) treatment with SBRT to a median prescribed dose of ≥55 Gy BED10, and (3) description of acute and/or late toxicity. There were no language or date restrictions. RESULTS A total of 35 studies, including 1,512 patients, were selected. Late grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 0.6% and 0.1% of the patients treated for A-P LN oligometastases. All late adverse events grade ≥ 3 occurred after treatment of the tumor with a minimum BED10 of 72 Gy. Of the 11 patients with severe late toxicity, five patients were re-irradiated. Late grade 2 and 1 toxicity was reported in 3.4% and 8.3% of the patients. Acute toxicity grades 4, 3, 2, and 1 occurred in 0.1%, 0.2%, 4.4%, and 19.8% of the patients, respectively. INTERPRETATION SBRT for A-P LN oligometastases show low toxicity rates. Nearly 50% of late adverse events ≥ grade 3 were associated with re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A Van Werkhoven
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands.
| | - Eugenio Cammareri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mischa S Hoogeman
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike T W Milder
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moran S, Cheng HH, Weg E, Kim EH, Chen DL, Iravani A, Ippolito JE. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) of prostate cancer: current and emerging applications. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:1288-1305. [PMID: 38386156 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04188-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is transforming the management of patients with prostate cancer. In appropriately selected patients, PSMA-PET offers superior sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional imaging (e.g., computed tomography and bone scintigraphy) as well as choline and fluciclovine PET, with the added benefit of consolidating bone and soft tissue evaluation into a single study. Despite being a newly available imaging tool, PSMA-PET has established indications, interpretation guidelines, and reporting criteria, which will be reviewed. The prostate cancer care team, from imaging specialists to those delivering treatment, should have knowledge of physiologic PSMA radiotracer uptake, patterns of disease spread, and the strengths and limitations of PSMA-PET. In this review, current and emerging applications of PSMA-PET, including appropriateness use criteria as well as image interpretation and pitfalls, will be provided with an emphasis on clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamus Moran
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Emily Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eric H Kim
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Delphine L Chen
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amir Iravani
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph E Ippolito
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 4559 Scott Ave., Mail Stop Code: 8131, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shaheen H, Salans MA, Mohamad O, Coleman PW, Ahmed S, Roach M. Age 70 +/- 5 Years and Cancer-Specific Outcomes After Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:672-681. [PMID: 37788716 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
A secondary analysis of 2 randomized Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials demonstrated that age ≥70 years was a favorable prognostic factor among men treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). In contrast, several series based on men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) suggested that older age was an unfavorable prognostic factor. Our study was initiated to determine whether these observations reflect a true but paradoxical underlying age-related treatment-dependent biological phenomenon. We conducted a systematic review (PubMed, January 1, 1999-January 30, 2023) evaluating the effect of age on cancer-specific outcomes after definitive local treatment with either RP or EBRT. Our main objective was to assess possible interactions between age (using a cutoff of 70 +/- 5 years) and treatment type, with regard to adverse cancer-specific outcomes (eg, pathology, biochemical failure, distant metastasis, or prostate cancer-specific survival). Forty-five studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review, including 30 and 15 studies with patients treated with RP and EBRT, respectively. Among patients treated with RP, 10 (50%) of these studies suggested that older age was associated with worse outcome(s) after RP. None suggested that age was a favorable prognostic factor after RP. Among the EBRT-based studies, 8 (53%) suggested that older age was associated with better outcomes, with an additional 3 studies (21%) trending to support a better outcome. None of these studies involving EBRT suggested that older age was an adverse prognostic factor. This systematic review suggests that age using a categorical cutoff of 70 +/- 5 years may be an adverse prognostic factor for men undergoing RP but a favorable prognostic factor for men treated with EBRT. Further research is needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitham Shaheen
- Clinical Oncology, Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Mia A Salans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pamela W Coleman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Soha Ahmed
- Clinical Oncology Department, Suez University, Suez, Egypt
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cuccia F, Tamburo M, Piras A, Mortellaro G, Iudica A, Daidone A, Federico M, Zagardo V, Ferini G, Marletta F, Spatola C, Fazio I, Filosto S, Pergolizzi S, Ferrera G. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lymph-Nodal Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Experience. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1442. [PMID: 37629732 PMCID: PMC10456704 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Background: The favorable role of SBRT for lymph-nodal oligometastases from prostate cancer has been reported by several retrospective and prospective experiences, suggesting a more indolent natural history of disease when compared to patients with bone oligometastases. This retrospective multicenter study evaluates the outcomes of a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for lymph-nodal oligometastases. Methods: Inclusion criteria were up to five lymph-nodal oligometastases detected either with Choline-PET or PSMA-PET in patients naïve for ADT or already ongoing with systemic therapy and at least 6 Gy per fraction for SBRT. Only patients with exclusive lymph-nodal disease were included. The primary endpoint of the study was LC; a toxicity assessment was retrospectively performed following CTCAE v4.0. Results: A total of 100 lymph-nodal oligometastases in 69 patients have been treated with SBRT between April 2015 and November 2022. The median age was 73 years (range, 60-85). Oligometastatic disease was mainly detected with Choline-PET in 47 cases, while the remaining were diagnosed using PSMA-PET, with most of the patients treated to a single lymph-nodal metastasis (48/69 cases), two in 14 cases, and three in the remaining cases. The median PSA prior to SBRT was 1.35 ng/mL (range, 0.3-23.7 ng/mL). Patients received SBRT with a median total dose of 35 Gy (range, 30-40 Gy) in a median number of 5 (range, 3-6) fractions. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 7-59 months), our LC rates were 95.8% and 86.3% at 1 and 2 years. DPFS rates were 90.4% and 53.4%, respectively, at 1 and 2 years, with nine patients developing a sequential oligometastatic disease treated with a second course of SBRT. Polymetastatic disease-free survival (PMFS) at 1 and 2 years was 98% and 96%. Six patients needed ADT after SBRT for a median time of ADT-free survival of 15 months (range, 6-22 months). The median OS was 16 months (range, 7-59) with 1- and 2-year rates of both 98%. In multivariate analysis, higher LC rates and the use of PSMA-PET were related to improved DPFS rates, and OS was significantly related to a lower incidence of distant progression. No G3 or higher adverse events were reported. Conclusions: In our experience, lymph-nodal SBRT for oligometastatic prostate cancer is a safe and effective option for ADT delay with no severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (G.M.)
| | - Maria Tamburo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95100 Catania, Italy; (M.T.)
| | - Antonio Piras
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (A.P.); (A.D.)
- RI.MED Foundation, 90100 Palermo, Italy
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Arianna Iudica
- Radiotherapy Unit, AOU Policlinico-VE, 95100 Catania, Italy; (A.I.); (C.S.)
| | - Antonino Daidone
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (A.P.); (A.D.)
| | - Manuela Federico
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (M.F.); (I.F.)
| | - Valentina Zagardo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, REM Radioterapia, 95100 Viagrande, CT, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ferini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, REM Radioterapia, 95100 Viagrande, CT, Italy
| | | | - Corrado Spatola
- Radiotherapy Unit, AOU Policlinico-VE, 95100 Catania, Italy; (A.I.); (C.S.)
| | - Ivan Fazio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (M.F.); (I.F.)
| | - Sergio Filosto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, La Maddalena Dipartimento Oncologico di III Livello, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Department of Radiological Science, University of Messina, 98121 Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (G.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
da Silva ACB, de Toledo LGM. ASO Author Reflections: PSMA PET in the Prostate Cancer Primary Staging Scenario-A Reliable Method with a Remarkable Decision-Making Impact. Ann Surg Oncol 2023:10.1245/s10434-023-13426-2. [PMID: 37010662 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13426-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignant tumor in men in Brazil and worldwide. Although positron emission tomography (PET) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been used for over 10 years and several studies have been published regarding its superior performance in PCa primary staging and other scenarios, the management decision is often still based on conventional imaging information. A retrospective analysis was performed in 35 patients with PCa in the primary staging scenario with conventional exams as well as with PET PSMA. The findings of our study showed changes on the staging classification and significant impact on the therapeutic choice. PET PSMA is a dependable imaging exam and has already proved its worth and superiority when compared with conventional methods to evaluate PCa patients in primary staging and biochemical relapse, in addition to other potential roles. Prospective studies are needed to assess the outcome of patients whose management was guided by PSMA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Carolina Borges da Silva
- Department of Uro-oncology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Luís Gustavo Morato de Toledo
- Department of Uro-oncology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tomassen ML, Damen PJJ, Verkooijen HM, Peters M, van der Stap J, van Lindert ASR, Verhoeff JJC, van Rossum PSN. Feasibility and first results of the 'Trials-within-Cohorts' (TwiCs) design in patients undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:237-244. [PMID: 36927251 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2183778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Background: 'Trials-within-Cohorts' (TwiCs), previously known as 'cohort multiple randomized controlled trials' is a pragmatic trial design, supporting an efficient and representative recruitment of patients for (future) trials. To our knowledge, the 'COhort for Lung cancer Outcome Reporting and trial inclusion' (COLOR) is the first TwiCs in lung cancer patients. In this study we aimed to assess the feasibility and first year results of COLOR.Material and Methods: All patients diagnosed with lung cancer referred to the Radiotherapy department were eligible to participate in the ongoing prospective COLOR study. At inclusion, written informed consent was requested for use of patient data, participation in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and willingness to participate in (future) trials. Feasibility was studied by assessing participation and comparing baseline PROs to EORTC reference values. First-year results of PROs at baseline and 3 months after inclusion were evaluated separately for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and conventional radiotherapy patients.Results: Of the 338 eligible patients between July 2020 and July 2021, 169 (50%) participated. Among these, 127 (75%) gave informed consent to PROs participation and 110 (65%) were willing to participate in (future) trials. The inclusion percentage dropped from 77% to 33% when the information procedure was switched from in-person to by phone (due to COVID-19 pandemic measures). Baseline PROs for physical and cognitive functioning were comparable in COLOR patients compared to the EORTC reference values. No significant changes in PROs were observed 3 months after inclusion, except for a slight increase in pain scores in the SBRT group (n = 97).Conclusions: The TwiCs-design appears feasible in lung cancer patients with fair participation rates (although negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic). With a planned expansion to other centers, the COLOR-study is expected to enable multiple (randomized) evaluations of experimental interventions with important advantages for recruitment, generalizability, and long-term outcome data collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathijs L Tomassen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J J Damen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Max Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spohn SKB, Draulans C, Kishan AU, Spratt D, Ross A, Maurer T, Tilki D, Berlin A, Blanchard P, Collins S, Bronsert P, Chen R, Pra AD, de Meerleer G, Eade T, Haustermans K, Hölscher T, Höcht S, Ghadjar P, Davicioni E, Heck M, Kerkmeijer LGW, Kirste S, Tselis N, Tran PT, Pinkawa M, Pommier P, Deltas C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Wiegel T, Zilli T, Tree AC, Qiu X, Murthy V, Epstein JI, Graztke C, Gao X, Grosu AL, Kamran SC, Zamboglou C. Genomic Classifiers in Personalized Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy Approaches: A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives Based on International Consensus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022:S0360-3016(22)03691-4. [PMID: 36596346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Current risk-stratification systems for prostate cancer (PCa) do not sufficiently reflect the disease heterogeneity. Genomic classifiers (GC) enable improved risk stratification after surgery, but less data exist for patients treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) or RT in oligo-/metastatic disease stages. To guide future perspectives of GCs for RT, we conducted (1) a systematic review on the evidence of GCs for patients treated with RT and (2) a survey of experts using the Delphi method, addressing the role of GCs in personalized treatments to identify relevant fields of future clinical and translational research. We performed a systematic review and screened ongoing clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. Based on these results, a multidisciplinary international team of experts received an adapted Delphi method survey. Thirty-one and 30 experts answered round 1 and round 2, respectively. Questions with ≥75% agreement were considered relevant and included in the qualitative synthesis. Evidence for GCs as predictive biomarkers is mainly available to the postoperative RT setting. Validation of GCs as prognostic markers in the definitive RT setting is emerging. Experts used GCs in patients with PCa with extensive metastases (30%), in postoperative settings (27%), and in newly diagnosed PCa (23%). Forty-seven percent of experts do not currently use GCs in clinical practice. Expert consensus demonstrates that GCs are promising tools to improve risk-stratification in primary and oligo-/metastatic patients in addition to existing classifications. Experts were convinced that GCs might guide treatment decisions in terms of RT-field definition and intensification/deintensification in various disease stages. This work confirms the value of GCs and the promising evidence of GC utility in the setting of RT. Additional studies of GCs as prognostic biomarkers are anticipated and form the basis for future studies addressing predictive capabilities of GCs to optimize RT and systemic therapy. The expert consensus points out future directions for GC research in the management of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Cédric Draulans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UH Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University
| | - Ashley Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network. Toronto, Canada
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Sean Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine
| | - Gert de Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Eade
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Höcht
- Xcare Practices Dept. Radiotherapy, Saarlouis, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| | | | - Matthias Heck
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany
| | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tselis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik Bonn, Germany
| | - Pascal Pommier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Constantinos Deltas
- Molecular Medicine Research Center and Laboratory of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alison C Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Xuefeng Qiu
- Department of Urology, Medical School of Nanjing University, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National University, India
| | - Jonathan I Epstein
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christian Graztke
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sophia C Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reply to "Letter to the editor regarding 'Stereotactic radiosurgery for bone metastases in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients: DESTROY-2 clinical trial subanalysis'". Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:1217-1218. [PMID: 35305244 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02813-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|