Treatment patterns, survival, and healthcare utilisation and costs in patients with locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer in Denmark 2015-2020

Patients with Metastatic or Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer Not Undergoing Systemic Oncological Treatment-Characteristics and Long-Term Outcome in a Single-Center Danish Cohort

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients with locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer (la/mBC) do not receive systemic oncological treatment. The reasons for refraining from systemic treatment are poorly investigated, as are the characteristics of patients who turn out to be long-term survivors despite lack of treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study included patients with registration compatible with la/mBC who did not undergo systemic treatment. They were seen at a single tertiary university hospital covering one of 5 Danish regions in the study period from 1 January 2012 until 31 December 2022. Patients were identified through a coding system, and detailed patient information was obtained in the electronic medical records.

RESULTS

The initial study population consisted of 472 patients registered with la/mBC according to codes in the patient registries but with no registration of systemic oncological treatment. Out of the total cohort, 159 patients were registered correctly, while the rest of the population were excluded due to misclassification, as 10.8% did not have la/mBC and 55.5% had received oncological treatment. Among correctly registered patients, the median overall survival was 2.6 months (95% CI 0.26; 4.94) from being diagnosed with la/mBC. The most common reasons for lack of treatment were poor general condition (74.2%), patient preference (19.5%), and poor renal function (11.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that a significant amount of patients in a cohort of suspected la/mBC not undergoing treatment either received oncological treatment or did not have la/mBC, demonstrating a misclassification in the system. This should be taken into consideration when evaluating data about survival time for this patient group. The poorest survival of untreated la/mBC is associated with a high tumor burden and specifically liver metastasis.

The usage of population and disease registries as pre-screening tools for clinical trials, a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to outline the use of population and disease registries for clinical trial pre-screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The search was conducted in the time period of January 2014 to December 2022 in three databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection. References were screened using the Rayyan software, firstly based on titles and abstracts only, and secondly through full text review. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the List of Included Studies and quality Assurance in Review tool, enabling inclusion of publications of only moderate to high quality.

RESULTS

The search originally identified 1430 citations, but only 24 studies were included, reporting the use of population and/or disease registries for trial pre-screening. Nine disease domains were represented, with 54% of studies using registries based in the USA, and 62.5% of the studies using national registries. Half of the studies reported usage for drug trials, and over 478,679 patients were identified through registries in this review. Main advantages of the pre-screening methodology were reduced financial burden and time reduction.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The use of registries for trial pre-screening increases reproducibility of the pre-screening process across trials and sites, allowing for implementation and improvement of a quality assurance process. Pre-screening strategies seem under-reported, and we encourage more trials to use and describe their pre-screening processes, as there is a need for standardized methodological guidelines.