High rate of non-treatment among osteoporotic women enrolled in a US Medicare plan

Knowledge and Awareness of Osteoporosis and Its Risk Factors Among the Adult Population in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a medical condition that affects the bones, causing them to become weak and fragile. People with osteoporosis are at a higher risk for fractures, resulting in an increase in morbidity and mortality rates. Despite its high prevalence worldwide, osteoporosis remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, leading to significant public health concerns, especially in Saudi Arabia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire to assess the level of awareness of osteoporosis and its risk factors among the adult population in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was distributed to a diverse, representative sample of 232 adults in Jeddah, covering demographic data, knowledge and awareness of osteoporosis and its risk factors, and lifestyle practices related to prevention and management. Data were analyzed using IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., employing descriptive analysis, cross-tabulation, and chi-square tests to evaluate knowledge levels and associated factors.

RESULTS

A total of 232 eligible adults participated, with a mean age of 35.6 ± 8.7 years. Most participants, 228 (98.3%), had heard of osteoporosis, and 137 (59.1%) had good overall knowledge of the disease. Key risk factors identified included calcium deficiency (210, 90.5%), increasing age (171, 73.7%), and family history (136, 58.6%). Although most participants accurately identified common risk factors, only 10.8% of participants consistently practiced a healthy and active lifestyle, highlighting the gap between awareness and preventive behaviors. Our study showed that gender (p-value = 0.049), educational level (p-value = 0.044), and whether the participant was diagnosed with or knew someone diagnosed with osteoporosis (p-value = 0.045) were statistically significant factors associated with the overall level of knowledge of osteoporosis in the participants.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasized the need for targeted interventions to improve knowledge and promote healthier lifestyle habits among adults in Jeddah to reduce the burden of osteoporosis. Future efforts should focus on bridging the gap between awareness and preventive actions, emphasizing the importance of healthy lifestyle habits and knowledge of osteoporosis risk factors.

Intradepartmental orthopaedic fragility fracture liaison improves osteoporosis follow-up and treatment

OBJECTIVE

Over 2 million people in the United States sustain fractures related to osteoporosis annually, but only 20% of these patients receive treatment for their osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a fragility fracture liaison within the orthopedic department on treatment and follow up for osteoporosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study SETTING: University Level I Trauma center PARTICIPANTS: 112 patients treated under the aegis of an interdepartmental fracture liaison and 208 patients treated following the introduction of an orthopedic fragility fracture liaison at a single institution.

INTERVENTION

Transition from referral to interdepartmental fracture liaison to intradepartmental orthopedic fragility fracture liaison for fragility fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes evaluated included demographics, fracture type, DEXA scan results, follow up and treatment plan, and subsequent fracture.

RESULTS

The mean age at time of fracture was 75 years, and the mean BMI was 27. The most common fracture types were femoral neck fractures (29%), pertrochanteric fractures (30%) and femur fractures (8%). There was a statistically significant increase in adherence to follow up and treatment after the introduction of an orthopaedic fragility fracture liaison.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of an intradepartmental fragility fracture liaison significantly increases osteoporosis follow-up and introduces the ability to combine both osteoporosis treatment and postoperative orthopaedic care. The results of this study highlight the utility of incorporating a fragility fracture liaison within the orthopaedic department given the economic burden of fragility fractures and the morbidity associated with these fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III cohort study.

Osteoporosis Care Gap After Hip Fracture - Worse With Low Healthcare Access and Quality

Despite the burden of osteoporosis-related fractures and availability of effective treatment, a substantial osteoporosis care gap persists. We evaluated this gap following fragility hip fracture, testing the hypothesis that patients who live in areas with low health care access or quality are less likely to undergo evaluation or treatment following hip fragility fracture. This retrospective analysis quantified osteoporosis evaluation and treatment just prior and for 12 mo following fragility hip fracture at an academic medical center in the upper Midwest. Initiation of pharmacologic therapy, Vitamin D screening and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning were measured. Each patient was assigned a value for 3 metrics of regional healthcare access and quality: (1) population per PCP ratio, (2) percent un-insured <65 yrs old, and (3) preventable hospitalization >65 yrs old. Generalized estimating equations, with county as a random effect, were used to assess the association of patient characteristics and/or heath care metrics with osteoporosis treatment at the time of admission and/or osteoporosis evaluation and treatment during hospitalization and post-discharge. A total of 585 patients were 80.7 ± 8.4 yrs of age at the time of hip fragility fracture; 68% were women. In 12 mo post-fracture, 17% underwent vitamin D screening, 12% received a DXA scan and 17% began a new bone anti-resorptive medication. Only in-hospital Vitamin D screening was more common in patients from counties with low healthcare access; all other pre- and post-fracture care was more common for patients with greater healthcare access and quality. Overall rates of initiating pharmacologic treatment and/or obtaining a Vitamin D screen or DXA scan following hip fragility fracture were very low and were worse in patients from counties with low access and quality of healthcare. These results remind the practitioner to diagnose and treat osteoporosis following hip fracture and suggests a role for targeting high-risk groups.

A Prospective Evaluation of the Awareness, Knowledge, and Management of Osteoporosis in a Cohort of Medical Staff

Objective

To investigate the differences in the awareness, knowledge, and management of osteoporosis from a cohort of medical staff after educational intervention.

Methods

A total of 653 medical workers from different departments related to the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis from 7 hospitals in Ningxia were enrolled. Information was collected using a designed questionnaire.

Results

After 5 years of educational intervention and follow-up, medical staff had an increased understanding of osteoporosis diagnosis, including dual-energy X-ray, ultrasound bone sonometer, fragility fracture history, biochemistry markers, and the awareness of the susceptible population. However, there was no improvement in the cognition of single/dual photo absorptiometry, symptoms and signs, and bone turnover index. Their understanding of antiosteoporosis drugs, especially the application of calcitonin, diphosphates, and vitamin D, was significantly promoted, while the perception of indicators and time in follow-up, some adverse drug reactions, and exercise therapy remained unchanged. Medical staff were remarkably less aware of the management of follow-up for osteoporosis, exercise and diet therapy, and bone turnover markers.

Conclusion

A great gap was identified in the perception of osteoporosis among medical staff in the Ningxia region. After the educational intervention, the knowledge regarding some aspects of osteoporosis generally improved. Much more effort should be made to strengthen the training and learning on the special detection methods of osteoporosis, medications and exercise therapy, and follow-up management.

Determinants of imminent fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

In elderly women with osteoporosis, prior fracture, low BMD, impaired physical functioning, poorer general health, and recent falls were all direct predictors of imminent (in next year) fracture risk. Prior fracture, older age, worse health, impaired cognitive functioning, and recent falls indirectly increased imminent risk by reducing physical functioning/general health.

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to examine determinants of imminent risk of osteoporotic fracture (i.e., next 1-2 years) in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from Caucasian women age 65 or older with osteoporosis who participated in the observational Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF). We examined potential direct and indirect predictors of hip and nonvertebral fractures in 1-year follow-up intervals including anthropometric measures, bone mineral density (T-score), fracture since age 50, physical function, cognition, medical conditions, recent (past year) falls, and lifestyle factors. Clinically related variables were grouped into constructs via factor analysis. These constructs and selected individual variables were incorporated into a theoretical structural equation model to evaluate factors that influence imminent risk.

RESULTS

Among 2261 patients, 19.4% had a nonvertebral fracture and 5.5% had a hip fracture within 1 year of a study visit between 1992 and 2008. Prior fracture, lower T-scores, lower physical functioning, and recent falls all directly increased 1-year risk of nonvertebral fracture. For both nonvertebral and hip fractures, prior fracture and recent falls influenced risk indirectly through general health, while cognition influenced risk via physical functioning. Age influenced both physical functioning and general health.

CONCLUSIONS

Several established risk factors for 10-year fracture risk also played a role in predicting imminent risk of fracture (e.g., T-scores, prior fracture), as did falls, cognition, physical functioning, and general health. Fracture risk assessments should also consider falls and fall risk factors as well as established bone-related risk factors in assessing imminent fracture risk.

Determinants of imminent fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

In elderly women with osteoporosis, prior fracture, low BMD, impaired physical functioning, poorer general health, and recent falls were all direct predictors of imminent (in next year) fracture risk. Prior fracture, older age, worse health, impaired cognitive functioning, and recent falls indirectly increased imminent risk by reducing physical functioning/general health.

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to examine determinants of imminent risk of osteoporotic fracture (i.e., next 1-2 years) in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from Caucasian women age 65 or older with osteoporosis who participated in the observational Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF). We examined potential direct and indirect predictors of hip and nonvertebral fractures in 1-year follow-up intervals including anthropometric measures, bone mineral density (T-score), fracture since age 50, physical function, cognition, medical conditions, recent (past year) falls, and lifestyle factors. Clinically related variables were grouped into constructs via factor analysis. These constructs and selected individual variables were incorporated into a theoretical structural equation model to evaluate factors that influence imminent risk.

RESULTS

Among 2261 patients, 19.4% had a nonvertebral fracture and 5.5% had a hip fracture within 1 year of a study visit between 1992 and 2008. Prior fracture, lower T-scores, lower physical functioning, and recent falls all directly increased 1-year risk of nonvertebral fracture. For both nonvertebral and hip fractures, prior fracture and recent falls influenced risk indirectly through general health, while cognition influenced risk via physical functioning. Age influenced both physical functioning and general health.

CONCLUSIONS

Several established risk factors for 10-year fracture risk also played a role in predicting imminent risk of fracture (e.g., T-scores, prior fracture), as did falls, cognition, physical functioning, and general health. Fracture risk assessments should also consider falls and fall risk factors as well as established bone-related risk factors in assessing imminent fracture risk.

Cost-effectiveness of five versus ten years of alendronate treatment prior to drug holiday for women with osteoporosis

We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 5 versus 10 years of alendronate treatment prior to 5-year drug holiday for US postmenopausal women with hip BMD T-scores between - 2.5 and - 3.5. We found that for most postmenopausal women 5 years of treatment prior to drug holiday is the more effective and cost-effective option.

INTRODUCTION

We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare 5 versus 10 years of alendronate treatment prior to 5-year drug holiday for postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

METHODS

We created an individual-level state-transition microsimulation model to compare 3 treatment strategies for US postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and femoral neck BMD T-scores between - 2.5 and - 3.5 at baseline: recurrent periods of 5 years of alendronate followed by 5 years of drug holiday (alendronate 5/5), recurrent periods of 10 years of alendronate followed by 5 years of drug holiday (alendronate 10/5), and no alendronate treatment.

RESULTS

Base-case analysis revealed for women initiating treatment at ages 50, 60, and 70, the alendronate 5/5 strategy dominated (was more effective and less costly than) the alendronate 10/5 strategy and no treatment. For women age 80, the alendronate 10/5 strategy dominated. When assuming a lower relative risk of nonvertebral fracture during years 6-10 of alendronate treatment than the base-case assumption, the alendronate 10/5 strategy became the most cost-effective strategy even at younger treatment initiation ages. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results supported the base-case findings; for treatment initiation ages of 50, 60, and 70, the alendronate 5/5 strategy was favored, whereas for treatment initiation age of 80, the alendronate 10/5 strategy was favored; however, there was uncertainty in these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

After 5 years of alendronate treatment, younger postmenopausal women (ages 50-70) with osteoporosis would likely benefit from a drug holiday, whereas older women (age 80) are likely to benefit from treatment for 10 years before a drug holiday.

Quality Measures and Quality Improvement Initiatives in Osteoporosis-an Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aims of this review are to summarize current performance for osteoporosis quality measures used by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) for pay-for-performance programs and to describe recent quality improvement strategies around these measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information (HEDIS) quality measures for the managed care population indicate gradual improvement in osteoporosis screening, osteoporosis identification and treatment following fragility fracture, and documentation of fall risk assessment and plan of care between 2006 and 2016. However, population-based studies suggest achievement for these process measures is lower where reporting is not mandated. Performance gaps remain, particularly for post-fracture care. Elderly patients with increased comorbidity are especially vulnerable to fractures, yet underperformance is documented in this population. Gender and racial disparities also exist. As has been shown for other areas of health care, education alone has a limited role as a quality improvement intervention. Multifactorial and systems-based interventions seem to be most successful in leading to measurable change for osteoporosis care and fall prevention. Despite increasing recognition of evidence-based quality measures for osteoporosis and incentives to improve upon performance for these measures, persistent gaps in care exist that will require further investigation into sustainable and value-adding quality improvement interventions.

Extensive undertreatment of osteoporosis in older Swedish women

In a population-based study of older Swedish women, we investigated the proportion of women treated with osteoporosis medication in relation to the proportion of women eligible for treatment according to national guidelines. We found that only a minority (22%) of those eligible for treatment were prescribed osteoporosis medication.

INTRODUCTION

Fracture rates increase markedly in old age and the incidence of hip fracture in Swedish women is among the highest in the world. Although effective pharmacological treatment is available, treatment rates remain low. Limited data are available regarding treatment rates in relation to fracture risk in a population-based setting in older women. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the proportion of older women eligible for treatment according to Swedish Osteoporosis Society (SvOS) guidelines.

METHODS

A population-based study was performed in Gothenburg in 3028 older women (77.8 ± 1.6 years [mean ± SD]). Bone mineral density of the spine and hip was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clinical risk factors for fracture and data regarding osteoporosis medication was collected with self-administered questionnaires. Logistic regression was used to evaluate whether the 10-year probability of sustaining a major osteoporotic fracture (FRAX-score) or its components predicted treatment with osteoporosis medication.

RESULTS

For the 2983 women with complete data, 1107 (37%) women were eligible for treatment using SvOS criteria. The proportion of these women receiving treatment was 21.8%. For women eligible for treatment according to SvOS guidelines, strong predictors for receiving osteoporosis medication were glucocorticoid treatment (odds ratio (95% CI) 2.88 (1.80-4.59)) and prior fracture (2.58 (1.84-3.61)).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that a substantial proportion of older Swedish women should be considered for osteoporosis medication given their high fracture risk, but that only a minority receives treatment.

Primary care physicians' views on osteoporosis management: a qualitative study

Osteoporosis is an under-diagnosed condition; only around 14% of patients in Sweden receive bone-specific treatment after a fragility fracture. This qualitative interview study found that primary care physicians perceive osteoporosis as a silent disease that is overshadowed by other conditions and is complicated to manage.

PURPOSE

To explore primary care physicians' views on managing osteoporosis.

METHODS

A total of 17 primary care physicians in Stockholm participated in four focus group interviews. Interview transcripts were analysed with thematic analysis.

RESULTS

One main theme was found: Osteoporosis-a silent disease overshadowed by other conditions. The main theme contained five sub-themes. Physicians perceived osteoporosis as a low-priority issue. They described uncertainty about managing it and insufficient awareness of the condition in primary healthcare (PHC). Physicians had differing opinions about who is responsible for managing osteoporosis. They reported that the health care system regulated their work such that they gave low priority to the condition. They were uncertain about the value of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). The physicians thought that financial incentives, education, and increased collaboration with other relevant health care professionals and with patients were needed to increase the priority of osteoporosis in PHC.

CONCLUSION

Physicians perceived osteoporosis as a silent disease that is complicated to manage. They gave low priority to osteoporosis and thought their patients shared this view. The physicians saw other issues and medical conditions as more important than osteoporosis. They wanted better collaboration at their PHC centres and with hospitals. They also wanted district nurses to be more involved in managing osteoporosis and especially in assessing fracture risk.

How Can We Improve Osteoporosis Care? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Quality Improvement Strategies for Osteoporosis

Although osteoporosis affects 10 million people in the United States, screening and treatment rates remain low. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of quality improvement strategies to improve osteoporosis screening (bone mineral density [BMD]/dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA] testing) and/or treatment (pharmacotherapy) initiation rates. We developed broad literature search strategies for PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, and applied inclusion/exclusion criteria to select relevant studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for outcomes of BMD/DXA testing and/or osteoporosis treatment. Forty-three randomized clinical studies met inclusion criteria. For increasing BMD/DXA testing in patients with recent or prior fracture, meta-analyses demonstrated several efficacious strategies, including orthopedic surgeon or fracture clinic initiation of osteoporosis evaluation or management (risk difference 44%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 26%-63%), fracture liaison service/case management (risk difference 43%, 95% CI 23%-64%), multifaceted interventions targeting providers and patients (risk difference 24%, 95% CI 15%-32%), and patient education and/or activation (risk difference 16%, 95% CI 6%-26%). For increasing osteoporosis treatment in patients with recent or prior fracture, meta-analyses demonstrated significant efficacy for interventions of fracture liaison service/case management (risk difference 20%, 95% CI 1%-40%) and multifaceted interventions targeting providers and patients (risk difference 12%, 95% CI 6%-17%). The only quality improvement strategy for which meta-analysis findings demonstrated significant improvement of osteoporosis care for patient populations including individuals without prior fracture was patient self-scheduling of DXA plus education, for increasing the outcome of BMD testing (risk difference 13%, 95% CI 7%-18%). The meta-analyses findings were limited by small number of studies in each analysis; high between-study heterogeneity; sensitivity to removal of individual studies; and unclear risk of bias of included studies. Despite the limitations of the current body of evidence, our findings indicate there are several strategies that appear worthwhile to enact to try to improve osteoporosis screening and/or treatment rates. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

The role of carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen, dual x-ray absorptiometry bone strain and Romberg test in a new osteoporotic fracture risk evaluation: A proposal from an observational study

The consolidated way of diagnosing and treating osteoporosis in order to prevent fragility fractures has recently been questioned by some papers, which complained of overdiagnosis and consequent overtreatment of this pathology with underestimating other causes of the fragility fractures, like falls. A new clinical approach is proposed for identifying the subgroup of patients prone to fragility fractures. This retrospective observational study was conducted from January to June 2015 at the Nuclear Medicine-Bone Metabolic Unit of the of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy. An Italian population of 125 consecutive postmenopausal women was investigated for bone quantity and bone quality. Patients with neurological diseases regarding balance and vestibular dysfunction, sarcopenia, past or current history of diseases and use of drugs known to affect bone metabolism were excluded. Dual X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess bone quantity (bone mineral density) and bone quality (trabecular bone score and bone strain). Biochemical markers of bone turnover (type I collagen carboxy-terminal telopeptide, alkaline phosphatase, vitamin D) have been measured. Morphometric fractures have been searched by spine radiography. Balance was evaluated by the Romberg test. The data were evaluated with the neural network analysis using the Auto Contractive Map algorithm. The resulting semantic map shows the Minimal Spanning Tree and the Maximally Regular Graph of the interrelations between bone status parameters, balance conditions and fractures of the studied population. A low fracture risk seems to be related to a low carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen level, whereas a positive Romberg test, together with compromised bone trabecular microarchitecture DXA parameters, appears to be strictly connected with fragility fractures. A simple assessment of the risk of fragility fracture is proposed in order to identify those frail patients at risk for osteoporotic fractures, who may have the best benefit from a pharmacological and physiotherapeutic approach.