Risk of peripheral edema in cancer patients treated with MEK inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Syndromes of Concurrent Hypertension, Diastolic Dysfunction, and Pulmonary or Peripheral Edema in Cardio-Oncology: Case Studies, Literature Review, and New Classification System

OPINION STATEMENT

Individuals who have ever been diagnosed with cancer are at increased risk for cardiovascular conditions during and after cancer treatment. Especially during cancer treatment, cardiovascular conditions can manifest in many ways, including peripheral or pulmonary edema. Edema can indicate volume overload affecting the heart even without other unequivocal evidence of apparent diastolic or systolic left ventricular dysfunction, particularly at rest. We propose a novel algorithm to streamline the diagnostic evaluation and cardiovascular classification for cancer patients with edema. We initially advise prompt evaluation with a chest X-ray and echocardiogram. We then suggest classification into one of five categories based on the timing of presentation of edema relative to cancer treatment, as well as echocardiography results and the presence or absence of hypertension or lymphatic causes of edema. This classification tool can then be utilized to guide further cardiovascular management suggestions. These concurrent syndromes presenting as edema may indicate the development or aggravation of undiagnosed diastolic dysfunction with or without hypertension, even if transiently present only while on cancer treatment.

Management of Peripheral Edema in Patients with MET Exon 14-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Small Molecule MET Inhibitors

Small molecule mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) inhibitors, such as crizotinib, capmatinib, and tepotinib, are treatment options for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in adult patients whose tumors have a mutation that leads to MET exon 14 skipping. In clinical trials, these MET inhibitors were associated with a high incidence of peripheral edema, although this was generally mild-to-moderate in severity. There is limited information about the mechanism involved in MET inhibitor-induced peripheral edema. Perturbation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/MET signaling may disrupt the permeability balance in the vascular endothelium and thus promote edema development. Another potential mechanism is through effects on renal function, although this is unlikely to be the primary mechanism. Because edema is common in cancer patients and may not necessarily be caused by the cancer treatment, or other conditions that have similar symptoms to peripheral edema, a thorough assessment is required to ascertain the underlying cause. Before starting MET-inhibitor therapy, patients should be educated about the possibility of developing peripheral edema. Patient limb volume should be measured before initiating treatment, to aid assessment if symptoms develop. Since the exact mechanism of MET inhibitor-induced edema is unknown, management is empiric, with common approaches including compression stockings, specific exercises, massage, limb elevation, and/or diuretic treatment. Although not usually required, discontinuation of MET inhibitor treatment generally resolves peripheral edema. Early diagnosis and management, as well as patient information and education, are vital to decrease the clinical burden associated with edema, and to reinforce capmatinib treatment adherence.

How we approach lymphedema in the pediatric population

Lymphedema in children is rare; however, it is usually a progressive and chronic condition. Accurate diagnosis of lymphedema in the pediatric population often takes several months and sometimes is delayed for years. Lymphedema can be isolated or associated with genetic syndromes, thus it is very important to identify the correct diagnosis, to select carefully which patients to refer for genetic testing, and to initiate appropriate treatment in a timely fashion. In this article, we review key information about diagnosis of lymphedema, associated conditions and syndromes, and current treatment modalities.

How we approach lymphedema in the pediatric population

Lymphedema in children is rare; however, it is usually a progressive and chronic condition. Accurate diagnosis of lymphedema in the pediatric population often takes several months and sometimes is delayed for years. Lymphedema can be isolated or associated with genetic syndromes, thus it is very important to identify the correct diagnosis, to select carefully which patients to refer for genetic testing, and to initiate appropriate treatment in a timely fashion. In this article, we review key information about diagnosis of lymphedema, associated conditions and syndromes, and current treatment modalities.

Adverse cutaneous effects of mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors in children

BACKGROUND

Mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors (MEKi) are currently used for the treatment of central nervous system tumors in children and have shown promising results. Cutaneous adverse effects are among the most common toxicities described in adults, but few studies exist in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the cutaneous adverse effects associated with MEKi in pediatric patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out at our pediatric hospital in Barcelona, Spain, in patients undergoing treatment with MEKi.

RESULTS

Sixty-one children between 1 and 18 years of age were included. All patients developed cutaneous toxicity. Eczema, hair abnormalities, oral aphthae, and paronychia were among the most common cutaneous side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing skin toxicity in pediatric patients under treatment with MEKi is essential to establishing appropriate education and therapy, thereby improving treatment tolerability and minimizing avoidable interruptions in treatment.

Selumetinib side effects in children treated for plexiform neurofibromas: first case reports of peripheral edema and hair color change

BACKGROUND

Plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) are congenital tumors that affect around 50 % of the subjects with neurofibromatosis type 1. Despite being histologically benign, PNs can grow rapidly, especially in the pediatric age, and cause severe morbidities. In the past, various therapeutic approaches have been proposed to treat these masses, none of which obtained valuable results. Selumetinib, an inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) 1 and 2, has been the first molecule to demonstrate the ability of tackling the growth of PNs. The drug's most common side effects, which usually are mild or moderate, include gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain), dermatologic manifestations (maculo-papular and acneiform rash, paronychia, mucositis), and various laboratory test abnormalities (elevation of creatine kinase and aminotransferase).

CASES PRESENTATION

We report two previously undescribed adverse events in pediatric patients: peripheral edema and hair color change. The first case of peripheral edema occurred in a 7-year-old boy affected by a severe form of NF1, after two years of treatment with selumetinib at the standard dose (25 mg/m²twice a day). The edema involved the right leg, and the patient did not complain of pain. The second case of peripheral edema occurred in a 12-year-old girl after six months of therapy with selumetinib at the standard dose, involving her lower left leg. The patient initially complained of pain in that area, but it gradually and spontaneously resolved. In both patients, all the radiological exams, including lymphoscintigraphy, pelvic and abdominal ultrasound, and doppler ultrasound of the affected limb, as well as blood tests, revealed no abnormalities. Hair color change appeared in a 4-year-old boy after six months of therapy at the standard dose. The boy's hair, whose natural color was dark blonde, became lighter in some areas. Despite the appearance of these side effects, all the patients and their families decided to continue the treatment with selumetinib, in considerations of its clinical benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the use of selumetinib to treat plexiform neurofibromas is increasing in the pediatric population, clinicians should be aware of its side effects, so to decide whether continuing the treatment, reducing the dose or even interrupting it, when appropriate.

Tolerability of BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations: adverse event evaluation and management

The inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinases signalling pathway through combined use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi+MEKi) represents an established therapeutic option in patients with BRAF-mutated, advanced melanoma. These efficient therapies are well tolerated with mostly moderate and reversible side effects and a discontinuation rate due to adverse events of 11.5%-15.7%. Median duration of therapy ranges between 8.8 and 11.7 months. Based on data from confirmatory trials, safety profiles of three BRAFi+MEKi combinations were reviewed, that is, dabrafenib plus trametinib, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib and encorafenib plus binimetinib. Many adverse events are class effects, such as cutaneous, gastrointestinal, ocular, cardiac and musculoskeletal events; some adverse events are substance associated. Fever (dabrafenib) and photosensitivity (vemurafenib) are the most common and clinically prominent examples. Other adverse events are less frequent and the association to one substance is less strong such as anaemia, facial paresis (encorafenib), neutropenia (dabrafenib), skin rash, QTc prolongation and increased liver function tests (vemurafenib). This narrative review provides recommendations for monitoring, adverse event evaluation and management focusing on the clinically relevant side effects of the three regimens.

Anti-tumor and anti-metastasis efficacy of E6201, a MEK1 inhibitor, in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks the receptor targets estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and thus, it does not respond to receptor-targeted treatments. TNBC has higher recurrence, metastasis, and mortality rates than other subtypes of breast cancer. Mounting data suggest that the MAPK (also known as RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK) pathway is an important therapeutic target in TNBC.

METHODS

To evaluate anti-tumor and anti-metastasis efficacy of E6201, we used cell proliferation assay, soft agar assay, cell cycle assay, Annexin V staining assay, immunoblotting analysis, immunohistochemistry, migration assay, invasion assay, mammary fat pad xenograft, and experimental and spontaneous metastasis xenograft models. We also evaluated the anti-tumor efficacy of E6201 plus CDK4/6 inhibitor, mTOR inhibitor, or ATR inhibitor.

RESULTS

E6201 inhibited TNBC cell colony formation, migration, and invasion in a dose-dependent manner. E6201 induced G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. E6201 inhibited TNBC xenograft growth and inhibited TNBC lung metastasis and improved mouse survival in experimental metastasis and spontaneous metastasis assays. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that E6201 decreased the metastatic burden in the lung and decreased phosphorylated ERK expression in a dose-dependent manner. Combination of E6201 with CDK4/6 inhibitor or mTOR inhibitor enhanced E6201's in vitro anti-tumor efficacy.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that E6201 exhibits anti-tumor efficacy against TNBC in vitro and anti-metastasis efficacy against TNBC in vivo. These results provide a rationale for further clinical development of E6201 as a MAPK-pathway-targeted therapy for TNBC.