Determination of blood sirolimus concentrations in liver and kidney transplant recipients using the Innofluor fluorescence polarization immunoassay: comparison with the microparticle enzyme immunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method

Overview of therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs: Analytical and clinical practices

Immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs) play a key role in short-term patient survival together with very low acute allograft rejection rates in transplant recipients. Due to the narrow therapeutic index and large inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability of ISDs, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is needed to dose adjustment for each patient (personalized medicine approach) to avoid treatment failure or side effects of the therapy. To achieve this, TDM needs to be done effectively. However, it would not be possible without the proper clinical practice and analytical tools. The purpose of this review is to provide a guide to establish reliable TDM, followed by a critical overview of the current analytical methods and clinical practices for the TDM of ISDs, and to discuss some of the main practical aspects of the TDM.

Antineoplastic drugs and their analysis: a state of the art review

We provide an overview of the analytical methods available for the quantification of antineoplastic drugs in pharmaceutical formulations, biological and environmental samples.

Current methods of the analysis of immunosuppressive agents in clinical materials: A review

More than 100000 solid organ transplantations are performed every year worldwide. Calcineurin (cyclosporine A, tacrolimus), serine/threonine kinase (sirolimus, everolimus) and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor (mycophenolate mofetil), are the most common drugs used as immunosuppressive agents after solid organ transplantation. Immunosuppressive therapy, although necessary after transplantation, is associated with many adverse consequences, including the formation of secondary metabolites of drugs and the induction of their side effects. Calcineurin inhibitors are associated with nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity; moreover, they increase the risk of many diseases after transplantation. The review presents a study of the movement of drugs in the body, including the processes of absorption, distribution, localisation in tissues, biotransformation and excretion, and also their accompanying side effects. Therefore, there is a necessity to monitor immunosuppressants, especially because these drugs are characterised by narrow therapeutic ranges. Their incorrect concentrations in a patient's blood could result in transplant rejection or in the accumulation of toxic effects. Immunosuppressive pharmaceuticals are macrolide lactones, peptides, and high molecular weight molecules that can be metabolised to several metabolites. Therefore the two main analytical methods used for their determination are high performance liquid chromatography with various detection methods and immunoassay methods. Despite the rapid development of new analytical methods of analysing immunosuppressive agents, the application of the latest generation of detectors and increasing sensitivity of such methods, there is still a great demand for the development of highly selective, sensitive, specific, rapid and relatively simple methods of immunosuppressive drugs analysis.

Sirolimus and everolimus clearance in maintenance kidney and liver transplant recipients: diagnostic efficiency of the concentration/dose ratio for the prediction of trough steady-state concentrations

OBJECTIVES

Therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus and everolimus is necessary in order to minimize adverse side-effects and to ensure effective immunosuppression. A sirolimus-dosing model using the concentration/dose ratio has been previously proposed for kidney transplant patients, and the aim of our study was the evaluation of this single model for the prediction of trough sirolimus and everolimus concentrations.

METHODS

Trough steady-state sirolimus concentrations were determined in several blood samples from each of 7 kidney and 9 liver maintenance transplant recipients, and everolimus concentrations from 20 kidney, 17 liver, and 3 kidney/liver maintenance transplant recipients. Predicted sirolimus and everolimus concentrations (Css), corresponding to the doses (D), were calculated using the measured concentrations (Css(0)) and corresponding doses (D(0)) on starting the study: Css = (Css(0))(D)/D(0).

RESULTS

The diagnostic efficiency of the predicting model for the correct classification as subtherapeutic, therapeutic, and supratherapeutic values with respect to the experimentally obtained concentrations was 91.3% for sirolimus and 81.4% for everolimus in the kidney transplant patients. In the liver transplant patients the efficiency was 69.2% for sirolimus and 72.6% for everolimus, and in the kidney/liver transplant recipients the efficiency for everolimus was 67.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The model has an acceptable diagnostic efficiency (>80%) for the prediction of sirolimus and everolimus concentrations in kidney transplant recipients, but not in liver transplant recipients. However, considering the wide ranges found for the prediction error of sirolimus and everolimus concentrations, the clinical relevance of this dosing model is weak.