Chronotype influences response to antidepressant chronotherapeutics in bipolar patients

Sex differences in insomnia and hypersomnia complaints during major depressive episode: Results from a national sample

BACKGROUND

Sex differences in sleep disturbances during major depressive episodes (MDE) have been suggested. This study compares the prevalence, sociodemographic characteristics, and psychiatric comorbidity associated with sleep complaints specific to each sex among adults with MDE. These findings are crucial for precise diagnosis, personalized treatment, and improved clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In a large nationally representative prospective survey, we used multi-adjusted logistic regression models including sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric comorbidity, and depression severity to examine whether associations differ between men and women.

RESULTS

Among women, 93.3 % reported at least one type of sleep complaints (i.e., trouble falling asleep, early morning awakening or hypersomnia) while 91.0 % of men did, with respectively 78.3 % and 77.2 % of insomnia complaints, and 46.2 % and 41.3 % of hypersomnia complaints. Women with sleep complaints were more likely to be black, with lower individual incomes, have histrionic personality disorder or a specific phobia. Conversely, men with sleep complaints were more likely to have a lifetime diagnosis of mania spectrum disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, drug use disorder, as well as dependent and schizotypal personality disorders. Surprisingly, being "never married" has emerged as a protective factor against sleep complaints in women, while posing as a risk factor in men compared to other marital statuses. Differences and specificities were also noted concerning subtypes of insomnia and hypersomnia complaints.

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional design means the associations found do not imply causality.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide insights into the complex relationship between sleep and depression in men and women, highlighting the need for personalized interventions.

Chronobiologic treatments for mood disorders

Chronotherapeutics are nonpharmacologic interventions whose development stems from investigations into sleep and circadian rhythm abnormalities associated with mood disorder. These therapies utilize controlled exposure to environmental cues (light, darkness) to regulate biologic rhythms. They encompass sleep-wake manipulations (partial/total sleep deprivation, sleep phase adjustment) and light therapy approaches. Growing evidence supports the safety and efficacy of chronotherapeutics in clinical settings. Indeed, they target core depressive symptoms, including suicidality and may represent a novel therapeutic approach for treatment-resistant depression. This makes them a viable treatment option, both as a monotherapy and in combination with existing psychopharmacologic medications and paves the way for their potential inclusion as first-line treatments for mood disorders.

Circadian markers as a predictor of response in the treatment of depression-A systematic review

Despite many available treatment options for depression, response rates remain suboptimal. To improve outcome, circadian markers may be suitable as markers of treatment response. This systematic review provides an overview of circadian markers that have been studied as predictors of response in treatment of depression. A search was performed (EMBASE, PUBMED, PSYCHINFO) for research studies or articles, randomized controlled trials and case report/series with no time boundaries on March 2, 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42021252333). Other criteria were; an antidepressant treatment as intervention, treatment response measured by depression symptom severity and/or occurrence of a clinical diagnosis of depression and assessment of a circadian marker at baseline. 44 articles, encompassing 8,772 participants were included in the analysis. Although additional research is needed with less variation in types of markers and treatments to provide definitive recommendations, circadian markers, especially diurnal mood variation and chronotype, show potential to implement as response markers in the clinic.

Antidepressant effects of acute sleep deprivation are reduced in highly controlled environments

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies summarized in a recent meta-analysis have shown sleep deprivation rapidly improves depressive symptoms in approximately 50 % of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD), however those studies were typically conducted in clinical settings. Here we investigated the effects of sleep deprivation utilizing a highly controlled experimental approach.

METHODS

36 antidepressant-free individuals with MDD and 10 healthy controls (HC) completed a 5 day/4-night protocol consisting of adaptation, baseline, total sleep deprivation (TSD), and recovery phases. Light was kept consistently dim (≤50 lx), meals were regulated, and activity was restricted. In-the-moment mood was assessed using a modified Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) at screening and each morning following the experimental nights.

RESULTS

Day of study had a significant effect on mood in both groups. Post-hoc analyses revealed that significant effects were attributed to mood improvement in the MDD group following study initiation prior to beginning TSD, and in the HC group following recovery sleep, but were not due to mood improvement in the MDD group during TSD. No further improvement in mood occurred during 36 h of TSD.

LIMITATIONS

Strict eligibility requirements may limit generalizability. The requirement to be medication free may have biased toward a less severely depressed sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Results revealed that individuals with moderate MDD can experience a significant reduction in depressive symptoms upon entering a highly controlled laboratory environment. Environmental effects on mood can be substantial and need to be considered.

Chronotype is associated with affective temperaments, clinical severity and worse treatment outcomes in bipolar disorders: results from a two-center, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

The present study was aimed at investigating the clinical correlates of evening chronotype in a population of subjects suffering from bipolar disorders (BD).

METHODS

We assessed chronotype using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. We administered the brief Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, and San Diego, the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, and the Alda Scale to evaluate affective temperaments, impulsiveness, and response to mood stabilisers. We performed bivariate analyses and ran a logistic regression model to analyse clinical variables associated with evening chronotype.

RESULTS

In our sample (n = 178), subjects with an evening chronotype (n = 56, 31.5%) more often suffered from BD type I and reported higher prevalence of seasonality, antidepressant-induced mood switches, psychotic, aggressive, mixed, and anxiety features, and substance use disorders. The number of lifetime suicide attempts and mood episodes was higher in this subgroup. Depressive, cyclothymic, irritable, and anxious temperament scores were higher among evening-chronotype subjects, who also displayed greater levels of impulsiveness and worse treatment response. At the logistic regression, evening chronotype was associated with depressive and irritable temperaments.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with evening chronotype display higher clinical severity and worse BD course. Clinicians should evaluate the presence of evening chronotype in BD subjects, especially in those with irritable or depressive temperament.Key pointsEvening chronotype is a frequent clinical feature in subjects suffering from bipolar disorders (BD);Affective temperaments, particularly depressive and irritable, are associated with evening chronotype in BD;Evening chronotype underpins higher severity of the clinical picture in BD, as well as a worse response to mood stabiliser treatment;Circadian preferences should be systematically assessed in subjects suffering from BD, with particular attention to evening preference.

Assessing the Significance of the Circadian Time of Administration on the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis

We aimed to provide insights on the role of the circadian time of administration in influencing the efficacy and tolerability/safety profile of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) for chronic migraine (CM) prophylaxis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical files of BoNTA-naïve patients with CM who completed three consecutive cycles of treatment, according to the standard PREEMPT paradigm. Participants were classified to those scheduled to be treated in the morning hours from 8:00 to 12:00 (AM) or afternoon hours from 13:00 to 18:00 (PM). We then assessed and compared between groups the changes from baseline (T0—trimester before BoNTA’s first administration) to the period after its third administration (T3) in the following efficacy outcomes: (i) mean number of headache days/month, (ii) mean number of days/month with peak headache intensity of >4/10, (iii) mean number of days/month with consumption of any abortive treatment. Safety−tolerability was also compared between groups. Results: A total of 50 AM and 50 PM-treated patients were evaluated. The within-group analysis in both groups showed a significant decrease in all efficacy variables between T0 and T3. However, the between-group comparisons of all BoNTA-related efficacy outcomes at T3 vs. T0 documented comparable improvements between AM vs. PM-treated patients. Safety/tolerability was also similar between groups. Conclusions: We were not able to identify significant differences between patients treated in the AM vs. PM, so as to demonstrate that the circadian time of administration should be considered before initiating BoNTA in CM patients.

Factors Associated With Response to Pilot Home-Based Light Therapy for Fatigue Following Traumatic Brain Injury and Stroke

Background: Fatigue and sleep disturbance are common and debilitating problems after brain injury. Light therapy shows promise as a potential treatment. We conducted a trial of in-home light therapy to alleviate fatigue and sleep disturbance. The aim of the current study was to identify factors moderating treatment response.

Methods: Participants were 24 individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (n = 19) or stroke (n = 5) reporting clinically significant fatigue. Outcomes included fatigue on Brief Fatigue Inventory (primary outcome), sleep disturbance on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, reaction time (RT) on Psychomotor Vigilance Task and time spent in productive activity. Interactions of demographic and clinical variables with these outcomes were examined in linear mixed-model analyses.

Results: Whilst there were no variables found to be significantly associated with change in our primary outcome of fatigue, some variables revealed medium or large effect sizes, including chronotype, eye color, injury severity as measured by PTA, and baseline depressive symptoms. Chronotype significantly moderated sleep quality, with evening chronotype being associated with greater improvement during treatment. Injury type significantly predicted mean RT, with stroke participants exhibiting greater post-treatment reduction than TBI. Age significantly predicted productive activity during Treatment, with younger participants showing stronger Treatment effect.

Conclusion: Light therapy may have a greater impact on sleep in younger individuals and those with an evening chronotype. Older individuals may need higher treatment dose to achieve benefit.

Clinical Trial Registration:www.anzctr.org.au, identifier: ACTRN12617000866303.

Meta-analysis of sleep deprivation in the acute treatment of bipolar depression

BACKGROUND

Sleep deprivation (SD) is an antidepressant intervention with multiple administration formats that has been investigated primarily with uncontrolled clinical trials and qualitative reviews of the literature. The validity and applicability of these findings to the treatment of bipolar depression (BPD) is uncertain.

METHODS

A PRISMA-based systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the efficacy of SD in the treatment of BPD and to identify moderator variables that influence response rate.

RESULTS

From a sample of 15 studies covering 384 patients, the overall, mean response rate to SD was 47.6% (CI 36.0%, 59.5%). This response rate compared post-SD to pre-SD depression scores, and not to a placebo control condition. Of several potential moderating variables examined, the use of adjunctive pharmacotherapy achieved statistical significance with response rates of 59.4% [CI 48.5, 69.5] for patients using adjunctive medication vs 27.4% [CI 17.8, 39.8] for patients not using adjunctive medication.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of SD in the treatment of BPD found an overall, response rate of almost 50%, reinforcing earlier estimates of efficacy. The use of adjunctive pharmacotherapy had a statistically significant moderating effect on SD response suggesting that clinical practice should routinely pair these interventions. These findings provide a higher level of evidence supporting the use of SD, especially when used with medication, and should inform future management guidelines for the treatment of BPD.

A randomized, controlled trial assessing the acute efficacy of triple chronotherapy in unipolar depression

BACKGROUND

Triple chronotherapy (wake night [one night without sleep], sleep phase advance, and early morning bright light exposure) demonstrated rapid efficacy primarily in bipolar depression, but has not been as well studied in unipolar depression. Our primary hypothesis is that triple chronotherapy is associated with a significantly greater Week 1 remission rate compared to the alternative protocol.

METHODS

Unipolar depressed, nonpsychotic adult outpatients were randomized to triple chronotherapy or an alternative protocol (assigned sleep times without wake night, bright light exposure with blue-green wavelengths filtered out). Symptoms were assessed with Structured Interview Guide for Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with Atypical Supplement (SIGH-ADS) at each visit and a modified form (m-SIGH) daily for the first week. Response was defined as a 50% decrease in m-SIGH score, and remission as m-SIGH≤7, modified Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (m-CGI-I)≤2, and no depressed mood on m-SIGH.

RESULTS

44 patients (84.1% major depressive disorder, 75.0% persistent depressive disorder; 54.5% female; age mean±SD 38.3 ± 15.2 years) were randomized to triple chronotherapy (N = 22) or an alternative protocol (N = 22). Week 1 remission rate was numerically higher but not statistically significant in the triple chronotherapy versus alternative protocol group (25.0% vs. 6.7%, Chi-square=1.76, df=1, p = 0.294). m-SIGH scores and response and remission rates on Days 2-7 were numerically improved without reaching statistical significance in the triple chronotherapy versus alternative protocol group.

LIMITATIONS

Predominantly white, educated sample.

CONCLUSIONS

This small pilot study demonstrated triple chronotherapy's feasibility and tolerability in unipolar depressed outpatients. Larger randomized trials are warranted to further characterize acute and long-term efficacy.

Effectiveness of preventive onabotulinumtoxin A injections for migraine headaches is dependent on the circadian time of administration

We have previously shown that quarterly preventive onabotulinumtoxin A (BTA) injections administered to diurnally active patients for chronic migraines (CM) associate with increased discomfort when performed in the morning. The purpose of this study was to further examine if the effectiveness of preventive BTA injections depends on the procedure's circadian timing. A total of 90 diurnally active patients with a medical history of CM and undergoing BTA injection therapy were enrolled in the study. One hundred and fifty-five units of BTA were administered according to the standardized PREEMPT protocol, either during the course of morning (AM) or afternoon (PM) clinic hours. Patients were asked to keep headache diaries, which were reviewed at the time of their follow-up BTA injections 3 months later. The number of headache days experienced during the first, second, and third month following BTA injection, and the number of headache days during the last 7 days prior to follow-up was collected, as was the self-rating of the effectiveness of BTA treatment. Fifty-five (61%) patients were injected during the AM clinic and 35 (39%) during the PM clinic. There was no difference in gender, race, and age variables between the AM and PM patients. The average total number of headache days during 3 months following injection was significantly higher for the AM-treated compared to the PM-treated patients (22.37 ± 18.85 vs. 10.54 ± 7.5, p =.0007). AM patients also reported a higher number of headache days during each of the 3 months following BTA injection. In contrast, PM patients reported higher effectiveness of preventive BTA treatment. The average number of headache days during the week prior to the follow up, as well as the presence of headache on the day of the follow-up was not significantly different between the AM and PM groups. Scheduling diurnally active CM patients with stable circadian sleep/wake routine for afternoon BTA injections appear to improve the effectiveness of BTA therapy as well as patients' satisfaction with the treatment.

Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Bright light therapy (BLT) was reported as an effective adjunctive treatment option for bipolar disorder. Previous meta-analytic study showed that augmentation treatment with light therapy significantly decreased the severity of bipolar depression. However, most of included studies were case-control studies and several of them focused on BLT that was provided in combination with sleep deprivation therapy.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, we used several electronic databases to search the studies and included only randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies to compare BLT with control experimental groups for treating bipolar depression with pharmacological treatment to clarify the adjunctive efficacy of BLT. We searched the databases of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies published in English until September 19, 2019. Two researchers conducted the literature screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment independently. The main outcome was the response rate and remission rate. We used the Review Manager 5.3 Software for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Four trials with a total of 190 participants (intervention: 94, control: 96) with bipolar depression were evaluated to gauge the effects of light therapy. The meta-analysis showed risk ratios of 1.78 (95% CI 1.24-2.56, p = .002; I2  = 17%) demonstrating a significant effect of light therapy in the response rate of bipolar disorder. The meta-analysis shows risk ratios of 2.03 (95% CI 0.48-8.59, p = .34; I2  = 67%) demonstrating no significant effect of light therapy in the remission rate of patients with bipolar disorder. None of the articles reported any serious adverse effects. Manic switch rate was 1.1% in the light therapy group and 1.2% in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Bright light therapy is an effective treatment for reducing depression symptoms among patients with bipolar depression.

Using Chronobiological Phenotypes to Address Heterogeneity in Bipolar Disorder

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a neuropsychiatric mood disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of mania and depression in addition to disruptions in sleep, energy, appetite, and cognitive functions-rhythmic behaviors that typically change on daily cycles. BD symptoms can also be provoked by seasonal changes, sleep, and/or circadian disruption, indicating that chronobiological factors linked to the circadian clock may be a common feature in the disorder. Research indicates that BD exists on a clinical spectrum, with distinct subtypes often intersecting with other psychiatric disorders. This heterogeneity has been a major challenge to BD research and contributes to problems in diagnostic stability and treatment outcomes. To address this heterogeneity, we propose that chronobiologically related biomarkers could be useful in classifying BD into objectively measurable phenotypes to establish better diagnoses, inform treatments, and perhaps lead to better clinical outcomes. Presently, we review the biological basis of circadian time keeping in humans, discuss the links of BD to the circadian clock, and pre-sent recent studies that evaluated chronobiological measures as a basis for establishing BD phenotypes. We conclude that chronobiology may inform future research using other novel techniques such as genomics, cell biology, and advanced behavioral analyses to establish new and more biologically based BD phenotypes.

Influence of chronotype on daily mood fluctuations: pilot study in patients with depression

Depression risk is associated with a late chronotype pattern often described as an 'evening chronotype'. Fluctuations in mood over consecutive days have not yet been measured according to chronotype in in-patients with depression. A total of 30 in-patients with depression and 32 healthy controls matched for gender and age completed a chronotype questionnaire and twice-daily ratings on mood for 10 consecutive days (registered in the German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00010215). The in-patients had Saturdays and Sundays as hospital-leave days. The relationship between chronotype and daily mood was mediated by the weekday-weekend schedule with higher levels of negative affect in the evening-chronotype patient subgroup at weekends. Results are discussed with respect to a probably advantageous standardised clinical setting with early morning routines, especially for patients with evening chronotypes.

Chronotherapy for the rapid treatment of depression: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronotherapy (sleep deprivation, sleep phase shifting and/or the use of bright light) combines non-invasive and non-pharmacological interventions that may act rapidly against depressive symptoms. However, to date no meta-analysis has been conducted to examine their effectiveness.

METHODS

We carried out meta-analysis of 16 studies (four randomised controlled trials and 12 open-label case series) with between-subject comparisons between experimental and control conditions for RCTs and within-subject comparisons between baseline and follow-up for all studies.

RESULTS

Overall chronotherapy was generally superior to other therapies such as psychotherapy, antidepressants, exercise or light therapy alone after 5-7 days. For RCTs, chronotherapy was favoured (Hedge's g = 0.62, 95% CI 0.23-1.01) compared to control treatments such as antidepressants and exercise. 33.0% of patients were responders after 5-7 days in the chronotherapy group and 1.5% of patients in the control condition (OR = 7.58, 95% CI 2.03-28.28). For the case series, large effect sizes were found by 5-7 days (g = 1.78, 95% CI 1.49-2.07). In the case series, 61.6% of patients were classed as responders.

LIMITATIONS

The number of RCTs included in this meta-analysis was small, and the potential for risk of bias could not be ascertained accurately. One specific limitation is that studies nearly all included in-patients and the results may not be generalisable to out-patients, and nearly all the subjects lacked credibility ratings before receiving treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronotherapy appears to be effective and well-tolerated in depressed patients. Nevertheless, further clinical and cost effectiveness studies are needed.