1
|
Antonic-Baker A, Auvrez C, Tao G, Bagg MK, Gadowski A, McKimmie A, Hicks AJ, Hill R, Romero L, Ponsford JL, Lannin NA, Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Rushworth N, Fitzgerald M, O'Brien TJ. The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Systematic Review and Consensus Process to Determine the Predictive Value of Pre-existing Health Conditions for People with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 2024. [PMID: 38450564 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The first aim of the Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) encompasses development of a set of measures that comprehensively predict outcomes for people with moderate-severe TBI across Australia. This process engaged diverse stakeholders and information sources across six areas: social, health, and clinical factors; biological markers; treatments; and longer-term outcomes. Here, we report the systematic review of pre-existing health conditions as predictors of outcome for people with moderate-severe TBI. Standardized searches were implemented across databases until March 31, 2022. English-language reports of studies evaluating association between pre-existing health conditions and clinical outcome in at least 10 patients with moderate-severe TBI were included. A predefined algorithm was used to assign a judgement of predictive value to each observed association. The list of identified pre-existing health conditions was then discussed with key stakeholders during a consensus meeting to determine the feasibility of incorporating them into standard care. The searches retrieved 22,217 records, of which 47 articles were included. The process led to identification of 88 unique health predictors (homologized to 21 predictor categories) of 55 outcomes (homologized to 19 outcome categories). Only pre-existing health conditions with high and moderate predictive values were discussed during the consensus meeting. Following the consensus meeting, 5 out of 11 were included (migraine, mental health conditions, ≥4 pre-existing health conditions, osteoporosis, and body mass index [BMI]) as common data elements in the AUS-TBI data dictionary. Upon further discussion, 3 additional pre-existing health conditions were included. These are pre-existing heart disease, frailty score, and previous incidence of TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Antonic-Baker
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Clarissa Auvrez
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gerard Tao
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew K Bagg
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Adelle Gadowski
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ancelin McKimmie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Belinda J Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, United Kingdom
| | - Peter A Cameron
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - D Jamie Cooper
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Terence J O'Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ponsford JL, Hicks AJ, Bagg MK, Phyland R, Carrier S, James AC, Lannin NA, Rushworth N, O'Brien TJ, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Hill R, Gabbe BJ, Fitzgerald M. The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Review and Recommendations for Outcome Measures for Use With Adults and Children After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurotrauma Rep 2024; 5:387-408. [PMID: 38655112 PMCID: PMC11035854 DOI: 10.1089/neur.2023.0127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) aims to select a set of measures to comprehensively predict and assess outcomes following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Australia. The aim of this article was to report on the implementation and findings of an evidence-based consensus approach to develop AUS-TBI recommendations for outcome measures following adult and pediatric moderate-to-severe TBI. Following consultation with a panel of expert clinicians, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representatives and a Living Experience group, and preliminary literature searches with a broader focus, a decision was made to focus on measures of mortality, everyday functional outcomes, and quality of life. Standardized searches of bibliographic databases were conducted through March 2022. Characteristics of 75 outcome measures were extracted from 1485 primary studies. Consensus meetings among the AUS-TBI Steering Committee, an expert panel of clinicians and researchers and a group of individuals with lived experience of TBI resulted in the production of a final list of 11 core outcome measures: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM); Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E); Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) (adult); mortality; EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D); Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI); Return to Work /Study (adult and pediatric); Functional Independence Measure for Children (WEEFIM); Glasgow Outcome Scale Modified for Children (GOS-E PEDS); Paediatric Quality of Life Scale (PEDS-QL); and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (pediatric). These 11 outcome measures will be included as common data elements in the AUS-TBI data dictionary. Review Registration PROSPERO (CRD42022290954).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie L. Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amelia J. Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew K. Bagg
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ruby Phyland
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Carrier
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amelia C. James
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natasha A. Lannin
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nick Rushworth
- Brain Injury Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Terence J. O'Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter A. Cameron
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia
| | - D. Jamie Cooper
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne Victoria, Australia
| | - Regina Hill
- Regina Hill Effective Philanthropy Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda J Gabbe
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, United Kingdom
| | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bagg MK, Hicks AJ, Hellewell SC, Ponsford JL, Lannin NA, O'Brien TJ, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Rushworth N, Gabbe BJ, Fitzgerald M. The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Statement of Working Principles and Rapid Review of Methods to Define Data Dictionaries for Neurological Conditions. Neurotrauma Rep 2024; 5:424-447. [PMID: 38660461 PMCID: PMC11040195 DOI: 10.1089/neur.2023.0116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) aims to develop a health informatics approach to collect data predictive of outcomes for persons with moderate-severe TBI across Australia. Central to this approach is a data dictionary; however, no systematic reviews of methods to define and develop data dictionaries exist to-date. This rapid systematic review aimed to identify and characterize methods for designing data dictionaries to collect outcomes or variables in persons with neurological conditions. Database searches were conducted from inception through October 2021. Records were screened in two stages against set criteria to identify methods to define data dictionaries for neurological conditions (International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision: 08, 22, and 23). Standardized data were extracted. Processes were checked at each stage by independent review of a random 25% of records. Consensus was reached through discussion where necessary. Thirty-nine initiatives were identified across 29 neurological conditions. No single established or recommended method for defining a data dictionary was identified. Nine initiatives conducted systematic reviews to collate information before implementing a consensus process. Thirty-seven initiatives consulted with end-users. Methods of consultation were "roundtable" discussion (n = 30); with facilitation (n = 16); that was iterative (n = 27); and frequently conducted in-person (n = 27). Researcher stakeholders were involved in all initiatives and clinicians in 25. Importantly, only six initiatives involved persons with lived experience of TBI and four involved carers. Methods for defining data dictionaries were variable and reporting is sparse. Our findings are instructive for AUS-TBI and can be used to further development of methods for defining data dictionaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K. Bagg
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Amelia J. Hicks
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah C. Hellewell
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jennie L. Ponsford
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natasha A. Lannin
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Terence J. O'Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter A. Cameron
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - D. Jamie Cooper
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nick Rushworth
- Brain Injury Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Belinda J. Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, United Kingdom
| | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Keeves J, Gadowski A, McKimmie A, Bagg MK, Antonic-Baker A, Hicks AJ, Clarke N, Brown A, McNamara R, Reeder S, Roman C, Jeffcote T, Romero L, Hill R, Ponsford JL, Lannin NA, O'Brien TJ, Cameron PA, Rushworth N, Fitzgerald M, Gabbe BJ, Cooper DJ. The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Systematic Review of the Effect of Acute Interventions on Outcome for People With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 2024. [PMID: 38279797 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) is developing a data resource to enable improved outcome prediction for people with moderate-severe TBI (msTBI) across Australia. Fundamental to this resource is the collaboratively designed data dictionary. This systematic review and consultation aimed to identify acute interventions with potential to modify clinical outcomes for people after msTBI, for inclusion in a data dictionary. Standardized searches were implemented across bibliographic databases from inception through April 2022. English-language reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating any association between any acute intervention and clinical outcome in at least 100 patients with msTBI, were included. A predefined algorithm was used to assign a value to each observed association. Consultation with AUS-TBI clinicians and researchers formed the consensus process for interventions to be included in a single data dictionary. Searches retrieved 14,455 records, of which 124 full-length RCTs were screened, with 35 studies included. These studies evaluated 26 unique acute interventions across 21 unique clinical outcomes. Only 4 interventions were considered to have medium modifying value for any outcome from the review, with an additional 8 interventions agreed upon through the consensus process. The interventions with medium value were tranexamic acid and phenytoin, which had a positive effect on an outcome; and decompressive craniectomy surgery and hypothermia, which negatively affected outcomes. From the systematic review and consensus process, 12 interventions were identified as potential modifiers to be included in the AUS-TBI national data resource.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemma Keeves
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australlia, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adelle Gadowski
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ancelin McKimmie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew K Bagg
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australlia, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Ana Antonic-Baker
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nyssa Clarke
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alastair Brown
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rob McNamara
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sandy Reeder
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Toby Jeffcote
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Regina Hill
- Regina Hill Effective Consulting Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Terence J O'Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter A Cameron
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nick Rushworth
- Brain Injury Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australlia, Australia
| | - Belinda J Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, United Kingdom
| | - D Jamie Cooper
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fitzgerald M, Ponsford JL, Hill R, Rushworth N, Kendall E, Armstrong E, Gilroy J, Bullen J, Keeves J, Bagg MK, Hellewell SC, Lannin NA, O'Brien TJ, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Gabbe BJ. The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Single Data Dictionary to Predict Outcome for People With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 2024. [PMID: 38117144 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
In this series of eight articles, the Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) consortium describes the Australian approach used to select the common data elements collected acutely that have been shown to predict outcome following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) across the lifespan. This article presents the unified single data dictionary, together with additional measures chosen to facilitate comparative effectiveness research and data linkage. Consultations with the AUS-TBI Lived Experience Expert Group provided insights on the merits and considerations regarding data elements for some of the study areas, as well as more general principles to guide the collection of data and the selection of meaningful measures. These are presented as a series of guiding principles and themes. The AUS-TBI Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Group identified a number of key points and considerations for the project approach specific to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, including key issues of data sovereignty and community involvement. These are outlined in the form of principles to guide selection of appropriate methodologies, data management, and governance. Implementation of the AUS-TBI approach aims to maximize ongoing data collection and linkage, to facilitate personalization of care and improved outcomes for people who experience moderate-severe TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Regina Hill
- Regina Hill Effective Consulting Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nick Rushworth
- Brain Injury Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Kendall
- The Hopkins Centre, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Armstrong
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - John Gilroy
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan Bullen
- Office of DVCA, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, West Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jemma Keeves
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew K Bagg
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sarah C Hellewell
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Terence J O'Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter A Cameron
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Jamie Cooper
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda J Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gabbe BJ, Keeves J, McKimmie A, Gadowski AM, Holland AJ, Semple BD, Young JT, Crowe L, Ownsworth T, Bagg MK, Antonic-Baker A, Hicks AJ, Hill R, Curtis K, Romero L, Ponsford JL, Lannin NA, O'Brien TJ, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Rushworth N, Fitzgerald M. The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Systematic Review and Consensus Process to Determine the Predictive Value of Demographic, Injury Event, and Social Characteristics on Outcomes for People With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 2024. [PMID: 38115598 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of the Australian Traumatic Brain Injury (AUS-TBI) Initiative is to develop a data dictionary to inform data collection and facilitate prediction of outcomes of people who experience moderate-severe TBI in Australia. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence of the association between demographic, injury event, and social characteristics with outcomes, in people with moderate-severe TBI, to identify potentially predictive indicators. Standardized searches were implemented across bibliographic databases to March 31, 2022. English-language reports, excluding case series, which evaluated the association between demographic, injury event, and social characteristics, and any clinical outcome in at least 10 patients with moderate-severe TBI were included. Abstracts and full text records were independently screened by at least two reviewers in Covidence. A pre-defined algorithm was used to assign a judgement of predictive value to each observed association. The review findings were discussed with an expert panel to determine the feasibility of incorporation of routine measurement into standard care. The search strategy retrieved 16,685 records; 867 full-length records were screened, and 111 studies included. Twenty-two predictors of 32 different outcomes were identified; 7 were classified as high-level (age, sex, ethnicity, employment, insurance, education, and living situation at the time of injury). After discussion with an expert consensus group, 15 were recommended for inclusion in the data dictionary. This review identified numerous predictors capable of enabling early identification of those at risk for poor outcomes and improved personalization of care through inclusion in routine data collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda J Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, United Kingdom
| | - Jemma Keeves
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Ancelin McKimmie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adelle M Gadowski
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew J Holland
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney School of Medicine, Westmead, Australia
| | - Bridgette D Semple
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jesse T Young
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Clinical Sciences Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Justice Health Group, Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louise Crowe
- Clinical Sciences Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Tamara Ownsworth
- School of Applied Psychology and the Hopkins Centre, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Matthew K Bagg
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | - Ana Antonic-Baker
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Regina Hill
- Regina Hill Effective Consulting Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kate Curtis
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Illawarra Shoalhaven LHD, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Terence J O'Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter A Cameron
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - D Jamie Cooper
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carminati JYJ, Holth K, Ponsford JL, Gould KR. Co-designing positive behaviour support (PBS+PLUS) training resources: a qualitative study of people with ABI, close-others, and clinicians' experiences. BRAIN IMPAIR 2024; 25:IB23060. [PMID: 38603544 DOI: 10.1071/ib23060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Challenging behaviours are often a significant difficulty faced following acquired brain injury (ABI), for which PBS+PLUS (a Positive Behaviour Support framework) is an effective intervention. Clinicians report experiencing a range of barriers to supporting behaviour change for individuals with ABI and require tailored resources to support the implementation of PBS+PLUS. This study aimed to describe the process of co-designing a PBS+PLUS intervention guidebook and podcast series together with individuals with ABI, close-others, and clinicians, and qualitatively examine co-design experiences. Methods The Knowledge-To-Action Framework was followed to support the translation of PBS+PLUS into clinical practice. Participants with ABI (n = 4), close-others (n = 7), and clinicians (n = 3) participated in focus groups contributing to the development of a PBS+PLUS intervention guidebook and podcast series. Following completion of the groups, qualitative interviews were conducted to understand participants' perspectives of the co-design experience. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Co-design processes are described, and participants provided practical suggestions for co-design and the dissemination of developed resources. Two core themes encapsulating four sub-themes were identified. Firstly, 'Esteeming Experiences ' described the person-driven approach of co-design whereby participants felt supported and connected with other contributors and facilitators through sharing their perspectives. Secondly, 'Empowerment ' reflected participants' increased confidence and skills in applying PBS+PLUS. Conclusions Overall, participants endorsed the therapeutic benefits of co-design engagement and high utility of PBS+PLUS resources. This study adds to the growing literature supporting the use of co-design methodology within clinical implementation, and is inclusive of individuals with ABI, close-others, and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jao-Yue J Carminati
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia
| | - Kristian Holth
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia
| | - Kate Rachel Gould
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Downing MG, Carty M, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Mckenzie D, Ponsford JL. The impact of age on outcome 2 years after traumatic brain injury: Case control study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2024; 67:101834. [PMID: 38518520 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Age is associated with outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there are mixed findings across outcome domains and most studies lack controls. OBJECTIVES This cross-sectional study examined the association between age group (15-24 years, 25-34 years, 35-44 years, 45-54 years, 55-64 years, and 65 years or more) and outcomes 2 years after TBI in independence in daily activities, driving, public transportation use, employment, leisure activities, social integration, relationships and emotional functioning, relative to healthy controls. It was hypothesized that older individuals with TBI would have significantly poorer outcomes than controls in all domains except anxiety and depression, for which it was expected they would show better outcomes. Global functional outcome (measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended) was also examined, and we hypothesized that older adults would have poorer outcomes than younger adults. METHODS Participants were 1897 individuals with TBI (mean, SD age 36.7, 17.7 years) who completed measures 2 years post-injury and 110 healthy controls (age 38.3, 17.5 years). RESULTS Compared to controls, individuals with TBI were less independent in most activities of daily living, participated less in leisure activities and employment, and were more socially isolated, anxious and depressed (p < 0.001). Those who were older in age were disproportionately less likely to be independent in light domestic activities, shopping and driving; and participated less in occupational activities relative to controls. Functional outcome was significantly higher in the youngest age group than in all older age groups (p < 0.001), but the younger groups were more likely to report being socially isolated (p < 0.001), depressed (p = 0.005) and anxious (p = 0.02), and less likely to be married or in a relationship (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION A greater focus is needed on addressing psychosocial issues in younger individuals with TBI, whereas those who are older may require more intensive therapy to maximise independence in activities of daily living and return to employment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina G Downing
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Meagan Carty
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John Olver
- Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Rose Acher
- Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ponsford JL, Carty M, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, McKenzie D, Downing MG. "It's Not Only the Injury but Also the Kind of Head." Factors Influencing Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024:S0003-9993(24)00884-0. [PMID: 38493908 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given the high variability in traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes and relative lack of examination of the influence of noninjury factors on outcome, this study aimed to examine factors associated with functional outcome at 1 and 2 years after moderate to severe TBI, including both preinjury and injury-related factors. DESIGN Observational cohort study. SETTING Inpatient hospital recruitment with outpatient follow-up at 1 and 2 years post injury. PARTICIPANTS Individuals with moderate to severe TBI were recruited prospectively into a Longitudinal Head Injury Outcome Study. Of the eligible 3253 individuals who were eligible, 1899 participants consented to the study (N=1899). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Functional outcome was measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E). RESULTS 1476 participants (73.6% males) and 1365 participants (73% males) completed the GOS-E at 1 and 2 years post injury. They had a mean age at injury of 40 years and mean duration of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) of 26 days. Good recovery, representing return to previous activities on the GOS-E (score 7-8), was present in 31% of participants at 1 year post injury and 33.5% at 2 years post injury. When predictor variables were entered into regression together, good outcome was significantly associated with not being from a culturally and linguistically diverse background and not having preinjury mental health or alcohol treatment, shorter PTA duration, and absence of limb injuries at both 1 and 2 years; higher education was also a significant predictor at 1 year post injury. CONCLUSIONS Alongside consideration of injury severity, consideration of preinjury factors is important to inform prognostication and rehabilitation planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne; School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne.
| | - Meagan Carty
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne; Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne
| | - John Olver
- Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne
| | | | | | - Dean McKenzie
- Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marina G Downing
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne; School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bagg MK, Hellewell SC, Keeves J, Antonic-Baker A, McKimmie A, Hicks AJ, Gadowski A, Newcombe VFJ, Barlow KM, Balogh ZJ, Ross JP, Law M, Caeyenberghs K, Parizel PM, Thorne J, Papini M, Gill G, Jefferson A, Ponsford JL, Lannin NA, O'Brien TJ, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Rushworth N, Gabbe BJ, Fitzgerald M. The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Systematic Review of Predictive Value of Biological Markers for People With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 2024. [PMID: 38115587 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) aims to co-design a data resource to predict outcomes for people with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Australia. Fundamental to this resource is the data dictionary, which is an ontology of data items. Here, we report the systematic review and consensus process for inclusion of biological markers in the data dictionary. Standardized database searches were implemented from inception through April 2022. English-language studies evaluating association between a fluid, tissue, or imaging marker and any clinical outcome in at least 10 patients with moderate-severe TBI were included. Records were screened using a prioritization algorithm and saturation threshold in Research Screener. Full-length records were then screened in Covidence. A pre-defined algorithm was used to assign a judgement of predictive value to each observed association, and high-value predictors were discussed in a consensus process. Searches retrieved 106,593 records; 1,417 full-length records were screened, resulting in 546 included records. Two hundred thirty-nine individual markers were extracted, evaluated against 101 outcomes. Forty-one markers were judged to be high-value predictors of 15 outcomes. Fluid markers retained following the consensus process included ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), S100, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Imaging markers included computed tomography (CT) scores (e.g., Marshall scores), pathological observations (e.g., hemorrhage, midline shift), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification (e.g., diffuse axonal injury). Clinical context and time of sampling of potential predictive indicators are important considerations for utility. This systematic review and consensus process has identified fluid and imaging biomarkers with high predictive value of clinical and long-term outcomes following moderate-severe TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K Bagg
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | - Sarah C Hellewell
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Jemma Keeves
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ana Antonic-Baker
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ancelin McKimmie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adelle Gadowski
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Virginia F J Newcombe
- PACE Section, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Karen M Barlow
- Acquired Brain Injury in Children Research Program, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Children's Health Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Zsolt J Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Jason P Ross
- Molecular Diagnostic Solutions, Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Australia
| | - Meng Law
- Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neuroscience and Radiology, Monash University, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karen Caeyenberghs
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Paul M Parizel
- University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Royal Perth Hospital and University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- West Australian National Imaging Facility Node, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Jacinta Thorne
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Melissa Papini
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Geena Gill
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Amanda Jefferson
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Terence J O'Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter A Cameron
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - D Jamie Cooper
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Belinda J Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, United Kingdom
| | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cameron KV, Ponsford JL, McKenzie DP, Stolwyk RJ. When stroke survivors' self-ratings are inconsistent with the ratings of others: a cohort study examining biopsychosocial factors associated with impaired self-awareness of functional abilities. BRAIN IMPAIR 2024; 25:IB23064. [PMID: 38566288 DOI: 10.1071/ib23064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Background Stroke survivors' self-ratings of functional abilities are often inconsistent with ratings assigned by others (e.g. clinicians), a phenomenon referred to as 'impaired self-awareness' (ISA). There is limited knowledge of the biopsychosocial contributors and consequences of post-stroke ISA measured across the rehabilitation journey. This multi-site cohort study explored biopsychosocial correlates of ISA during subacute rehabilitation (inpatient) and at 4 months post-discharge (community-dwelling). Methods Forty-five subacute stroke survivors participated (Age M (s.d.) = 71.5 (15.6), 56% female), and 38 were successfully followed-up. Self-assessments were compared to those of an independent rater (occupational therapist, close other) to calculate ISA at both time points. Survivors and raters completed additional cognitive, psychological and functional measures. Results Multivariate regression (multiple outcomes) identified associations between ISA during inpatient admission and poorer outcomes at follow-up, including poorer functional cognition, participation restriction, caregiver burden, and close other depression and anxiety. Regression models applied cross-sectionally, including one intended for correlated predictors, indicated associations between ISA during inpatient admission and younger age, male sex, poorer functional cognition, poorer rehabilitation engagement and less frequent use of non-productive coping (adjusted R 2 = 0.60). ISA at community follow-up was associated with poorer functional cognition and close other anxiety (adjusted R 2 = 0.66). Conclusions Associations between ISA and poorer outcomes across the rehabilitation journey highlight the clinical importance of ISA and the value of assessment and management approaches that consider the potential influence of numerous biological and psychosocial factors on ISA. Future studies should use larger sample sizes to confirm these results and determine the causal mechanisms of these relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate V Cameron
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Dean P McKenzie
- Epworth HealthCare, Office for Research, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Renerus J Stolwyk
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Symons GF, Gregg MC, Hicks AJ, Rowe CC, Shultz SR, Ponsford JL, Spitz G. Altered grey matter structural covariance in chronic moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1728. [PMID: 38242923 PMCID: PMC10799053 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50396-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) alters brain network connectivity. Structural covariance networks (SCNs) reflect morphological covariation between brain regions. SCNs may elucidate how altered brain network topology in TBI influences long-term outcomes. Here, we assessed whether SCN organisation is altered in individuals with chronic moderate-severe TBI (≥ 10 years post-injury) and associations with cognitive performance. This case-control study included fifty individuals with chronic moderate-severe TBI compared to 75 healthy controls recruited from an ongoing longitudinal head injury outcome study. SCNs were constructed using grey matter volume measurements from T1-weighted MRI images. Global and regional SCN organisation in relation to group membership and cognitive ability was examined using regression analyses. Globally, TBI participants had reduced small-worldness, longer characteristic path length, higher clustering, and higher modularity globally (p < 0.05). Regionally, TBI participants had greater betweenness centrality (p < 0.05) in frontal and central areas of the cortex. No significant associations were observed between global network measures and cognitive ability in participants with TBI (p > 0.05). Chronic moderate-severe TBI was associated with a shift towards a more segregated global network topology and altered organisation in frontal and central brain regions. There was no evidence that SCNs are associated with cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia F Symons
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, 6th Floor, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| | - Matthew C Gregg
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Ground Floor, 185-187 Hoddle St, Richmond, 3121, Australia
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Ground Floor, 185-187 Hoddle St, Richmond, 3121, Australia
| | - Christopher C Rowe
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Sandy R Shultz
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, 6th Floor, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Health Sciences, Vancouver Island University, 900 Fifth Street, Nanaimo, BC, V9R 5S5, Canada
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Ground Floor, 185-187 Hoddle St, Richmond, 3121, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, 6th Floor, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Ground Floor, 185-187 Hoddle St, Richmond, 3121, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hwang JHA, Downing MG, Specht RAG, Ponsford JL. Co-designing for behavioural change: understanding barriers and enablers to addressing sexuality after traumatic brain injury and mapping intervention strategies in a multi-disciplinary rehabilitation unit. BRAIN IMPAIR 2024; 25:IB23068. [PMID: 38566291 DOI: 10.1071/ib23068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Background Persistent changes in sexuality often follow traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, health professionals remain reticent about discussing sexuality and have reported barriers including uncertainties around whose role it is and limited educational and institutional support. This study employed a co-design and implementation process, aiming to promote team-wide behavioural change, whereby health professionals at a TBI rehabilitation unit would attempt to address sexuality with patients routinely. Methods Focus group sessions with multidisciplinary health professionals were conducted to identify barriers and enablers to behavioural change, identify areas for development, and co-design intervention options. Implementation deliverables were then finalised and provided to the team. The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to map factors influencing behaviours and the Behaviour Change Wheel was used to map interventions. Thematic analysis was used to further analyse barrier themes. Results Thirty-five barriers and eight enablers falling within 12 theoretical domains to behavioural change were identified. Thematic analysis revealed highly correlated barriers in initiating and sustaining change. Nine co-designed intervention options aligned with five intervention functions of the Behaviour Change Wheel, resulting in six final implementation deliverables. Conclusions Barriers were highly interrelated, influencing the approach to implementation deliverables. Simultaneously addressing multiple barriers could potentially alleviate discomfort associated with discussing sexuality. Concerns around initiating change were related to confidence in achieving sustainable changes. Achieving change requires organisational and team-level environmental restructuring and enablement. The next step involves evaluating the effectiveness of the co-design and implementation process in driving behavioural change and potential impacts on patient satisfaction and sexuality outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill H A Hwang
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3121, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121 Australia
| | - Marina G Downing
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3121, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121 Australia
| | - Riccarda A G Specht
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3121, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sharp VL, Gardner B, Ponsford JL, Chapman JE, Giummarra MJ, Lannin NA, Olver J, Stolwyk RJ. Providing rehabilitation services to major traumatic injury survivors in rural Australia: perspectives of rehabilitation practitioners and compensation claims managers. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:334-343. [PMID: 36587832 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2160836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The delivery of healthcare services in rural locations can be challenging. From the perspectives of rural rehabilitation practitioners and compensation claims managers, this study explored the experience of providing and coordinating rehabilitation services for rural major traumatic injury survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Semi-structured interviews with 14 rural rehabilitation practitioners and 10 compensation claims managers were transcribed, and reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Six themes were identified (1) Challenges finding and connecting with rural services, (2) Factors relating to insurance claims management, (3) Managing the demand for services, (4) Good working relationships, (5) Limited training and support, and (6) Client resilience and community. System-related barriers included a lack of available search resources to find rural rehabilitation services, limited service/clinician availability and funding policies lacking the flexibility to meet rehabilitation needs in a rural context. Strong peer and interdisciplinary relationships were viewed as crucial facilitators, which rural practitioners were particularly adept at developing. CONCLUSIONS Greater consideration of unique needs within rural contexts is required when developing service delivery models. Specifically, flexible and equitable funding policies; facilitating interdisciplinary connections, support and training for rehabilitation practitioners and compensation claims managers; and harnessing clients' resilience may improve the delivery of rural services.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRural survivors of major traumatic injury often have ongoing health and rehabilitation needs and struggle to access required treatment services.Rehabilitation providers and compensation claims managers highlighted areas for improvement in rural areas, including resources for locating available services, funding the additional costs of rural service delivery, and greater service choice for clients.Building rural workforce capacity for treatment of major traumatic injury is needed, including improved clinician access to specialist training and support.Developing good working relationships between clients and clinicians, including interdisciplinary collaborations, and supporting client resilience and self-management should be promoted in future service delivery models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Sharp
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Betina Gardner
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jodie E Chapman
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melita J Giummarra
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John Olver
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Research Unit, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renerus J Stolwyk
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Carminati JYJ, Ponsford JL, Gould KR. Co-developing 'The CyberABIlity Scale' to assess vulnerability to cyberscams for people with acquired brain injury: Delphi and cognitive interviews with clinicians and people with acquired brain injury. BRAIN IMPAIR 2024; 25:IB23065. [PMID: 38566289 DOI: 10.1071/ib23065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Background Although individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) may be vulnerable to cyberscams, the lack of existing measures documenting cybersafety behaviours in people with ABI limits our understanding of ABI-specific risk factors, the frequency of this problem, and the ability to evaluate evidence-based interventions. The CyberABIlity Scale was developed to assess vulnerability in people with ABI via self-rated statements and practical scam-identification tasks. This study aimed to develop and refine The CyberABIlity Scale through feedback from clinicians and people with ABI. Methods Scale feedback was collected via three rounds of clinician surveys (n = 14) using Delphi methods and two rounds of cognitive interviews with participants with ABI (n = 8). Following each round, feedback was quantitatively and qualitatively summarised, and revisions were made accordingly. Results Key revisions included removing 12 items deemed irrelevant. Instructions and rating scales were revised to improve clarity. Cognitive interviews identified 15 comprehension errors, with further revisions made to support response clarity for participants with ABI. Clinicians and participants with ABI endorsed the content and face validities of The CyberABIlity Scale . Conclusions Following further validation, The CyberABIlity Scale has the potential to be an effective screening measure for online vulnerability for people with ABI within clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jao-Yue J Carminati
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia
| | - Kate Rachel Gould
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia; and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hlauschek G, Lossius MI, Schwartz DL, Silbert LC, Hicks AJ, Ponsford JL, Vivash L, Sinclair B, Kwan P, O'Brien TJ, Shultz SR, Law M, Spitz G. Reduced total number of enlarged perivascular spaces in post-traumatic epilepsy patients with unilateral lesions - a feasibility study. Seizure 2023; 113:1-5. [PMID: 37847935 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the value of automated enlarged perivascular spaces (ePVS) quantification to distinguish chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE+) from chronic TBI patients without PTE (PTE-) in a feasibility study. METHODS Patients with and without PTE were recruited and underwent an MRI post-TBI. Multimodal auto identification of ePVS algorithm was applied to T1-weighted MRIs to segment ePVS. The total number of ePVS was calculated and corrected for white matter volume, and an asymmetry index (AI) derived. RESULTS PTE was diagnosed in 7 out of the 99 participants (male=69) after a median time of less than one year since injury (range 10-22). Brain lesions were observed in all 7 PTE+ cases (unilateral=4, 57%; bilateral=3, 43%) as compared to 40 PTE- cases (total 44%; unilateral=17, 42%; bilateral=23, 58%). There was a significant difference between PTE+ (M=1.21e-4, IQR [8.89e-5]) and PTE- cases (M=2.79e-4, IQR [6.25e-5]) in total corrected numbers of ePVS in patients with unilateral lesions (p=0.024). No differences in AI, trauma severity and lesion volume were seen between groups. CONCLUSION This study has shown that automated quantification of ePVS is feasible and provided initial evidence that individuals with PTE with unilateral lesions may have fewer ePVS compared to TBI patients without epilepsy. Further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to determine the value of ePVS quantification as a PTE-biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gernot Hlauschek
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, National Centre for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Morten I Lossius
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, National Centre for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Daniel L Schwartz
- Oregon Health & Science University, Oregon Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Neurology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, USA.
| | - Lisa C Silbert
- Oregon Health & Science University, Oregon Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Neurology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, USA.
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Lucy Vivash
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia,; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Benjamin Sinclair
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia,.
| | - Patrick Kwan
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia,; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Terrence J O'Brien
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia,; Departments of Medicine and Neurology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Sandy R Shultz
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia,; Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences, Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, Canada.
| | - Meng Law
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Reyes J, Spitz G, Major BP, O'Brien WT, Giesler LP, Bain JWP, Xie B, Rosenfeld JV, Law M, Ponsford JL, O'Brien TJ, Shultz SR, Willmott C, Mitra B, McDonald SJ. Utility of Acute and Subacute Blood Biomarkers to Assist Diagnosis in CT-Negative Isolated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurology 2023; 101:e1992-e2004. [PMID: 37788938 PMCID: PMC10662993 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Blood biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have recently been Food and Drug Administration approved as predictors of intracranial lesions on CT after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, most cases with mTBI are CT negative, and no biomarkers are approved to assist diagnosis in these individuals. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal combination of blood biomarkers to assist mTBI diagnosis in otherwise healthy adults younger than 50 years presenting to an emergency department within 6 hours of injury. To further understand the utility of biomarkers, we assessed how biological sex, presence or absence of loss of consciousness and/or post-traumatic amnesia (LOC/PTA), and delayed presentation affected classification performance. METHODS Blood samples, symptom questionnaires, and cognitive tests were prospectively conducted for participants with mTBI recruited from The Alfred Hospital Level 1 Emergency & Trauma Center and uninjured controls. Follow-up testing was conducted at 7 days. Simoa quantified plasma GFAP, UCH-L1, tau, neurofilament light chain (NfL), interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1β. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) analysis assessed classification accuracy for diagnosed mTBI, and logistic regression models identified optimal biomarker combinations. RESULTS Plasma IL-6 (AUC 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.96), GFAP (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93), and UCH-L1 (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.88) best differentiated mTBI (n = 74) from controls (n = 44) acutely (<6 hours), with NfL (AUC 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.90) the only marker to have such utility subacutely (7 days). Biomarker performance was similar between sexes and for participants with and without LOC/PTA, with the exception at 7 days, where GFAP and IL-6 retained some utility in female participants (GFAP: AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.88; IL-6: AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.87) and in those with LOC/PTA (GFAP: AUC 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.86; IL-6: AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.84). Acute IL-6 (R 2 = 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.64) outperformed GFAP and UCH-L1 combined (R 2 = 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.50), with the best acute model featuring GFAP and IL-6 (R 2 = 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.68). DISCUSSION These findings indicate that adding IL-6 to a panel of brain-specific proteins such as GFAP and UCH-L1 might assist in the acute diagnosis of mTBI in adults younger than 50 years. Multiple markers had high classification accuracy in participants without LOC/PTA. When compared with the best-performing acute markers, subacute measures of plasma NfL resulted in minimal reduction in classification accuracy. Future studies will investigate the optimal time frame over which plasma IL-6 might assist diagnostic decisions and how extracranial trauma affects utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Reyes
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Brendan P Major
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - William T O'Brien
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lauren P Giesler
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jesse W P Bain
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Becca Xie
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeffrey V Rosenfeld
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Meng Law
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Terence J O'Brien
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandy R Shultz
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catherine Willmott
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Biswadev Mitra
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stuart J McDonald
- From the Department of Neuroscience (J.R., G.S., B.P.M., W.T.O.B., L.P.G., J.W.P.B., B.X., M.L., T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), School of Psychological Sciences (J.R., G.S., C.W.), Monash University; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (J.R., G.S., J.L.P., C.W.), Epworth Hospital; Department of Neurosurgery (J.V.R.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Surgery (J.V.R.), Monash University; Department of Radiology (M.L.), The Alfred Hospital; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (M.L.), Monash University; Department of Neurology (T.J.O.B., S.R.S., S.J.M.), The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., S.R.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Health Sciences (S.R.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; Australian Football League (AFL) (C.W.); Emergency & Trauma Centre (B.M.), The Alfred Hospital; and School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (B.M.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Carminati JYJ, Ponsford JL, Gould KR. "This group… I felt like I was medicating myself from this cyberscam illness that was living with me." A qualitative evaluation of co-designing cybersafety training resources with and for people with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:3719-3729. [PMID: 36342759 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2139418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Whilst anyone can be scammed, individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) may have unique risk factors to cyberscams for which tailored interventions are required. To address this, a co-design approach was utilised to develop cybersafety resources with people with living experience of ABI and scams. This study aimed to evaluate the co-design experience to inform future utilisation of co-design methods. METHOD Semi-structured qualitative interviews explored perceived benefits and challenges, level of support and the co-design process for people with ABI (n= 7) and an attendant care worker (ACW) (n= 1). Transcripts were analysed using a six-stage reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Five themes were identified: "An Intervention Addressing Shame"; "Feeling Validated and Valued"; "Experiencing a 'Profound Change Amongst a Group of Peers'"; 'Gaining Stronger Scam Awareness'; and 'Taking Ownership'. Adjustments to support communication, memory impairments and fatigue in the co-design process were recommended. CONCLUSIONS Participant reflections on the co-design process extended beyond resource design and highlighted therapeutic benefits of increased insight and emotional recovery from shame. Likely mechanisms underpinning these benefits were the peer group format and opportunities to make meaningful contributions. Despite identified challenges in facilitating co-design projects, the practical and emotional benefits reported by participants underscore the value of co-design with people with ABI. Implications for rehabilitationIndividuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) may be at increased risk of cyberscams due to cognitive impairments, for which tailored cyberscam interventions are required.Using a co-design approach maximises the relevance of training resources for individuals with ABI.Using a collaborative co-design approach to developing cybersafety training resources may facilitate scam awareness and peer support.Support for communication, memory impairments and fatigue may be necessary in co-design efforts with people with ABI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jao-Yue J Carminati
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia
| | - Kate Rachel Gould
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hicks AJ, Sinclair B, Shultz SR, Pham W, Silbert LC, Schwartz DL, Rowe CC, Ponsford JL, Law M, Spitz G. Associations of Enlarged Perivascular Spaces With Brain Lesions, Brain Age, and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurology 2023; 101:e63-e73. [PMID: 37156615 PMCID: PMC10351302 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Enlarged perivascular spaces (ePVS) have been identified as a key signature of glymphatic system dysfunction in neurologic conditions. The incidence and clinical implications of ePVS after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are not yet understood. We investigated whether individuals with chronic moderate-to-severe TBI had an increased burden of ePVS and whether ePVS burden is modulated by the presence of focal lesions, older brain age, and poorer sleep quality. We examined whether an increased burden of ePVS was associated with poorer cognitive and emotional outcomes. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, participants with a single moderate-to-severe chronic TBI (sustained ≥10 years ago) were recruited from an inpatient rehabilitation program. Control participants were recruited from the community. Participants underwent 3T brain MRI, neuropsychological assessment, and clinical evaluations. ePVS burden in white matter was quantified using automated segmentation. The relationship between the number of ePVS, group membership, focal lesions, brain age, current sleep quality, and outcome was modeled using negative binomial and linear regressions. RESULTS This study included 100 participants with TBI (70% male; mean age = 56.8 years) and 75 control participants (54.3% male; mean age = 59.8 years). The TBI group had a significantly greater burden of ePVS (prevalence ratio rate [PRR] = 1.29, p = 0.013, 95% CI 1.05-1.57). The presence of bilateral lesions was associated with greater ePVS burden (PRR = 1.41, p = 0.021, 95% CI 1.05-1.90). There was no association between ePVS burden, sleep quality (PRR = 1.01, p = 0.491, 95% CI 0.98-1.048), and sleep duration (PRR = 1.03, p = 0.556, 95% CI 0.92-1.16). ePVS was associated with verbal memory (β = -0.42, p = 0.006, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.12), but not with other cognitive domains. The burden of ePVS was not associated with emotional distress (β = -0.70, p = 0.461, 95% CI -2.57 to 1.17) or brain age (PRR = 1.00, p = 0.665, 95% CI 0.99-1.02). DISCUSSION TBI is associated with a greater burden of ePVS, especially when there have been bilateral brain lesions. ePVS was associated with reduced verbal memory performance. ePVS may indicate ongoing impairments in glymphatic system function in the chronic postinjury period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia J Hicks
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Benjamin Sinclair
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandy R Shultz
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - William Pham
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa C Silbert
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel L Schwartz
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christopher C Rowe
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Meng Law
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- From the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (A.J.H., J.L.P., G.S.), Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience (A.J.H., B.S., S.R.S., W.P., M.L., G.S.), Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton; Department of Neurology (B.S.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Health and Human Services (S.S.), Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo; Division of Medical Sciences (S.S.), University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; NIA-Layton Oregon Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (L.C.S., D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University; Department of Neurology (L.C.S.), Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Advanced Imaging Research Center (D.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (C.C.R.), Austin Health, Heidelberg; Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.C.R.), University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Department of Radiology (M.L.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Løke D, Andelic N, Helseth E, Vassend O, Andersson S, Ponsford JL, Tverdal C, Brunborg C, Løvstad M. Stability and Change in Biopsychosocial Factors Associated With Fatigue 6 and 12 Months After Traumatic Brain Injury: An Exploratory Multilevel Study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2023; 38:E244-E253. [PMID: 36602267 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore factors associated with stability and change in fatigue from 6 to 12 months following traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING Combined in- and outpatient acute care and postacute rehabilitation settings. PARTICIPANTS A total of 103 patients with confirmed intracranial injury were assessed 6 and/or 12 months following TBI. DESIGN A prospective observational study with repeated measures at 2 time points, analyzed with a hybrid mixed-effects model. MAIN MEASURES Primary outcomes were the fatigue factor derived from items from several fatigue patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; Fatigue Severity Scale, Chalder Fatigue Scale, Giessen Subjective Complaints List-fatigue subscale, and Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire-fatigue item) Secondary outcomes were PROMs relating to pain, somatic and psychological distress, insomnia, sleepiness, personality traits, optimism, resilience, behavioral activation and inhibition, and loneliness, as well as neuropsychological measures. Demographic variables and injury severity characteristics were included as covariates. RESULTS In multilevel regression, female sex, years of education, and 3 factors related to injury severity, somatic vulnerability, and psychosocial robustness were all significantly associated with variation in fatigue between subjects, and explained 61% of the variance in fatigue that was due to stable between-subject differences. Fatigue levels declined significantly over time. Changes in pain severity, somatic symptom burden, psychological distress, and behavioral inhibition were positively associated with changes in fatigue, explaining 22% of the variance in fatigue within subjects. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated that several previously implicated factors show robust effects in distinguishing individuals with TBI on levels of fatigue, but only a few show additional within-subject associations across time. Pain severity, somatic symptom burden, psychological distress, and behavioral inhibition correlated with fatigue across time, implicating these factors as crucial targets for rehabilitation of patients with TBI who suffer from persistent fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Løke
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyr, Norway (Mr Løke and Dr Løvstad); Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Mr Løke and Drs Vassend, Andersson, and Løvstad); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, and Institute of Health and Society, Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Dr Andelic); Department of Neurosurgery, Ullevål Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Drs Helseth and Tverdal); Psychosomatic and CL Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Dr Andersson); Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia (Dr Ponsford); and Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ms Brunborg)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fraser EE, Downing MG, Haines K, Bennett L, Olver J, Ponsford JL. Experience of adapted cognitive behaviour therapy to address sexuality problems after traumatic brain injury: A qualitative study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2023:1-28. [PMID: 37306485 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2023.2221858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Although sexuality has been shown to be negatively impacted in up to half of individuals who sustain traumatic brain injury (TBI), few studies have sought to evaluate the efficacy of targeted interventions. Gaining insight into the participant experience of undergoing treatment for post-TBI sexuality changes is a crucial aspect of intervention evaluation. This study aimed to investigate participants with TBI experience of undergoing eight sessions of a novel CBT intervention designed to help both couples and singles improve sexual wellbeing after TBI. Eight participants (50% male) with moderate-severe TBI, and a mean age of 46.38-years (SD = 13.54), completed a qualitative interview. A six-phase reflexive thematic analysis approach was used. Despite variability in participant characteristics, the findings suggested that participants with TBI experience reflected that of a positive treatment journey characterized by high levels of enjoyment and satisfaction. Key themes identified included contextual factors that preceded treatment, factors that facilitated treatment engagement, outcomes derived from the treatment experience, and feedback provided on reflection. The results not only provide an enriched understanding of the client experience of the intervention but provide corroborating preliminary evidence of efficacy for this novel CBT intervention in addressing complex and persistent sexuality problems after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor E Fraser
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Australia
| | - Marina G Downing
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Australia
| | - Kerrie Haines
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Linda Bennett
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - John Olver
- Epworth HealthCare, Rehabilitation Medicine, Richmond, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Taing AS, Mundy ME, Ponsford JL, Spitz G. Traumatic brain injury alters the relationship between brain structure and episodic memory. Brain Behav 2023; 13:e3012. [PMID: 37132290 PMCID: PMC10275516 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal and diffuse pathology resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) often disrupts brain circuitry that is critical for episodic memory, including medial temporal lobe and prefrontal regions. Prior studies have focused on unitary accounts of temporal lobe function, associating verbally learned material and brain morphology. Medial temporal lobe structures, however, are domain-sensitive, preferentially supporting different visual stimuli. There has been little consideration of whether TBI preferentially disrupts the type of visually learned material and its association with cortical morphology following injury. Here, we investigated whether (1) episodic memory deficits differ according to the stimulus type, and (2) the pattern in memory performance can be linked to changes in cortical thickness. METHODS Forty-three individuals with moderate-severe TBI and 38 demographically similar healthy controls completed a recognition task in which memory was assessed for three categories of stimuli: faces, scenes, and animals. The association between episodic memory accuracy on this task and cortical thickness was subsequently examined within and between groups. RESULTS Our behavioral results support the notion of category-specific impairments: the TBI group had significantly impaired accuracy for memory for faces and scenes, but not animals. Moreover, the association between cortical thickness and behavioral performance was only significant for faces between groups. CONCLUSION Taken together, these behavioral and structural findings provide support for an emergent memory account, and highlight that cortical thickness differentially affects episodic memory for specific categories of stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbie S. Taing
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental HealthMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research CentreRichmondVictoriaAustralia
| | - Matthew E. Mundy
- Faculty of Health and EducationTorrens UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jennie L. Ponsford
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental HealthMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research CentreRichmondVictoriaAustralia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental HealthMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research CentreRichmondVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sharp VL, Chapman JE, Gardner B, Ponsford JL, Giummarra MJ, Lannin NA, Olver J, Stolwyk RJ. Perspectives of major traumatic injury survivors on accessibility and quality of rehabilitation services in rural Australia. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:1379-1388. [PMID: 35417290 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2060345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For the 30% of Australians who live in rural areas, access to rehabilitation services after sustaining a major traumatic injury can be challenging. This study aimed to explore the experience of rural major traumatic injury survivors accessing rehabilitation services. MATERIALS AND METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 rural major traumatic injury survivors (Mage = 47.86; SD = 11.35; Range: 21-61) who were an average of seven years post-injury (SD = 3.10; Range: 3.25-13.01). Transcribed interviews were thematically analysed. RESULTS Four themes were identified: (1) Managing the transition back to local services, (2) Independence and determination to get better, (3) Rehabilitation is an ongoing process, and (4) Limited service access and quality. While injury-related symptoms persisted for many participants, they expressed strong determination for independence and self-management of their recovery. Barriers to accessing rehabilitation services included poor knowledge of local services, travel burden, financial costs, and a lack of local practitioners experienced in major traumatic injury rehabilitation. Facilitating factors included financial, psychological, community, and informal supports. CONCLUSIONS To support recovery, future rural service models should improve consideration of factors resulting from living at a distance to services and harness independence to self-manage.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRural major traumatic injury survivors need support to navigate numerous barriers to accessing rehabilitation services.Rural participants expressed their preference for greater involvement in planning their transition back home following hospitalisation and help to link with available services in their local area.Specialist training and support for rural rehabilitation practitioners is needed, to effectively treat impairments related to major traumatic injury, particularly psychological and cognitive difficulties.Future service delivery models should incorporate methods to locate rural services; facilitate telehealth access and client self-management; and provide financial and mental health support to both rural survivors of major traumatic injury and their carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Sharp
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jodie E Chapman
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Betina Gardner
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melita J Giummarra
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John Olver
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Research Unit, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renerus J Stolwyk
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wu Y, Levis B, Daray FM, Ioannidis JPA, Patten SB, Cuijpers P, Ziegelstein RC, Gilbody S, Fischer FH, Fan S, Sun Y, He C, Krishnan A, Neupane D, Bhandari PM, Negeri Z, Riehm KE, Rice DB, Azar M, Yan XW, Imran M, Chiovitti MJ, Boruff JT, McMillan D, Kloda LA, Markham S, Henry M, Ismail Z, Loiselle CG, Mitchell ND, Al-Adawi S, Beck KR, Beraldi A, Bernstein CN, Boye B, Büel-Drabe N, Bunevicius A, Can C, Carter G, Chen CK, Cheung G, Clover K, Conroy RM, Costa-Requena G, Cukor D, Dabscheck E, De Souza J, Downing M, Feinstein A, Ferentinos PP, Flint AJ, Gallagher P, Gandy M, Grassi L, Härter M, Hernando A, Jackson ML, Jenewein J, Jetté N, Julião M, Kjærgaard M, Köhler S, König HH, Krishna LKR, Lee Y, Löbner M, Loosman WL, Love AW, Löwe B, Malt UF, Marrie RA, Massardo L, Matsuoka Y, Mehnert A, Michopoulos I, Misery L, Nelson CJ, Ng CG, O'Donnell ML, O'Rourke SJ, Öztürk A, Pabst A, Pasco JA, Peceliuniene J, Pintor L, Ponsford JL, Pulido F, Quinn TJ, Reme SE, Reuter K, Riedel-Heller SG, Rooney AG, Sánchez-González R, Saracino RM, Schellekens MPJ, Scherer M, Benedetti A, Thombs BD, Et Al. Comparison of the accuracy of the 7-item HADS Depression subscale and 14-item total HADS for screening for major depression: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychol Assess 2023; 35:95-114. [PMID: 36689386 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The seven-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) and the total score of the 14-item HADS (HADS-T) are both used for major depression screening. Compared to the HADS-D, the HADS-T includes anxiety items and requires more time to complete. We compared the screening accuracy of the HADS-D and HADS-T for major depression detection. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis and fit bivariate random effects models to assess diagnostic accuracy among participants with both HADS-D and HADS-T scores. We identified optimal cutoffs, estimated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, and compared screening accuracy across paired cutoffs via two-stage and individual-level models. We used a 0.05 equivalence margin to assess equivalency in sensitivity and specificity. 20,700 participants (2,285 major depression cases) from 98 studies were included. Cutoffs of ≥7 for the HADS-D (sensitivity 0.79 [0.75, 0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.75, 0.80]) and ≥15 for the HADS-T (sensitivity 0.79 [0.76, 0.82], specificity 0.81 [0.78, 0.83]) minimized the distance to the top-left corner of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Across all sets of paired cutoffs evaluated, differences of sensitivity between HADS-T and HADS-D ranged from -0.05 to 0.01 (0.00 at paired optimal cutoffs), and differences of specificity were within 0.03 for all cutoffs (0.02-0.03). The pattern was similar among outpatients, although the HADS-T was slightly (not nonequivalently) more specific among inpatients. The accuracy of HADS-T was equivalent to the HADS-D for detecting major depression. In most settings, the shorter HADS-D would be preferred. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Wu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Brooke Levis
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Federico M Daray
- Institute of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires
| | | | - Scott B Patten
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit
| | | | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York
| | - Felix H Fischer
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| | - Suiqiong Fan
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Ying Sun
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Chen He
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Ankur Krishnan
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Dipika Neupane
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | | | - Zelalem Negeri
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Kira E Riehm
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Danielle B Rice
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Marleine Azar
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Xin Wei Yan
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Mahrukh Imran
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | | | - Jill T Boruff
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University
| | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York
| | | | - Sarah Markham
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London
| | - Melissa Henry
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | - Zahinoor Ismail
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary
| | | | | | - Samir Al-Adawi
- Department of Behavioural Medicine, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University
| | - Kevin R Beck
- Department of Psychiatry, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Anna Beraldi
- kbo Lech-Mangfall-Klinik für Psychatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychsomatik, Garmisch-Partenkirchen
| | | | - Birgitte Boye
- Department of Behavioural Medicine, University of Oslo
| | | | | | - Ceyhun Can
- Adana City Training and Research Hospital
| | - Gregory Carter
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle
| | - Chih-Ken Chen
- Community Medicine Research Center, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine
| | - Gary Cheung
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland
| | - Kerrie Clover
- Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle
| | - Ronán M Conroy
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
| | - Gema Costa-Requena
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Centro de Investigacióo Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Panagiotis P Ferentinos
- 2nd Department of Psychiatry, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
| | | | | | - Milena Gandy
- The School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University
| | - Luigi Grassi
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara
| | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg, University of Hamburg
| | | | | | - Josef Jenewein
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Graz
| | - Nathalie Jetté
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| | - Miguel Julião
- Equipa Comunitária de Suporte em Cuidados Paliativos de Sintra
| | - Marie Kjærgaard
- Endocrinology Research Group, Medical Clinic, University Hospital of North Norway
| | - Sebastian Köhler
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | | | - Yu Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine
| | - Margrit Löbner
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig
| | | | | | - Bernd Löwe
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Ulrik F Malt
- Department of Research and Education Division of Surgery and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oslo
| | - Ruth Ann Marrie
- Department of Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba
| | - Loreto Massardo
- Centro de Biología Celular y Biomedicina, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián
| | - Yutaka Matsuoka
- Division of Health Care Research, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center
| | - Anja Mehnert
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig
| | - Ioannis Michopoulos
- 2nd Department of Psychiatry, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
| | | | - Christian J Nelson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Chong Guan Ng
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
| | | | | | | | - Alexander Pabst
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig
| | - Julie A Pasco
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University
| | - Jurate Peceliuniene
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic of Internal Diseases, Family Medicine and Oncology, Vilnius University
| | - Luis Pintor
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Augusto Pi i Sunyer
| | | | | | - Terence J Quinn
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow
| | - Silje E Reme
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo
| | - Katrin Reuter
- Private Practice for Psychotherapy and Psycho-oncology, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg
| | - Steffi G Riedel-Heller
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig
| | | | - Roberto Sánchez-González
- Department of Psychiatry, Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiccions, Centre Emili Mira, Parc de Salut Mar
| | - Rebecca M Saracino
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - Martin Scherer
- Institute of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andrea Benedetti
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University
| | - Brett D Thombs
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Phyland RK, McKay A, Olver J, Walterfang M, Hopwood M, Ponsford M, Ponsford JL. Use of Olanzapine to Treat Agitation in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Series of N-of-One Trials. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:33-51. [PMID: 35833454 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Agitation is common during post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is associated with risk of harm to patients and caregivers. Antipsychotics are frequently used to manage agitation in early TBI recovery despite limited evidence to support their efficacy, safety, and impact upon patient outcomes. The sedating and cognitive side effects of these agents are theorized to exacerbate confusion during PTA, leading to prolonged PTA duration and increased agitation. This study, conducted in a subacute inpatient rehabilitation setting, describes the results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy of olanzapine for agitation management during PTA, analyzed as an n-of-1 series. Group comparisons were additionally conducted, examining level of agitation; number of agitated days; agitation at discharge, duration, and depth of PTA; length of hospitalization; cognitive outcome; adverse events; and rescue medication use. Eleven agitated participants in PTA (mean [M] age = 39.82 years, standard deviation [SD] = 20.06; mean time post-injury = 46.09 days, SD = 32.75) received oral olanzapine (n = 5) or placebo (n = 6) for the duration of PTA, beginning at a dose of 5 mg/day and titrated every 3 to 4 days to a maximum dose of 20 mg/day. All participants received recommended environmental management for agitation. A significant decrease in agitation with moderate to very large effect (Tau-U effect size = 0.37-0.86) was observed for three of five participants receiving olanzapine, while no significant reduction in agitation over the PTA period was observed for any participant receiving placebo. Effective olanzapine dose ranged from 5-20 mg. Response to treatment was characterized by lower level of agitation and response to treatment within 3 days. In group analyses, participants receiving olanzapine demonstrated poorer orientation and memory during PTA with large effect size (olanzapine, mean = 9.32, SD = 0.69; placebo, M = 10.68, SD = 0.30; p = .009, d = -2.16), and a trend toward longer PTA duration with large effect size (olanzapine, M = 71.96 days, SD = 20.31; placebo, M = 47.50 days, SD = 11.27; p = 0.072, d = 1.26). No further group comparisons were statistically significant. These results suggest that olanzapine can be effective in reducing agitation during PTA, but not universally so. Importantly, administration of olanzapine during PTA may lead to increased patient confusion, possibly prolonging PTA. When utilizing olanzapine, physicians must therefore balance the possible advantages of agitation management with the possibility that the patient may never respond to the medication and may experience increased confusion, longer PTA and potentially poorer outcomes. Further high-quality research is required to support these findings and the efficacy and outcomes associated with the use of any pharmacological agent for the management of agitation during the PTA period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruby K Phyland
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Center, Melbourne, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Australia
| | - Adam McKay
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Center, Melbourne, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Australia.,Division of Rehabilitation and Mental Health, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John Olver
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.,Epworth Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Research Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Walterfang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Malcolm Hopwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Albert Road Clinic Professorial Psychiatry Unit, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Ponsford
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.,Epworth Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Research Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Center, Melbourne, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hwang JHA, Fraser EE, Downing MG, Ponsford JL. A qualitative study on the attitudes and approaches of Australian clinicians in addressing sexuality after acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44:8294-8302. [PMID: 34951561 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2012605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies indicate that up to 50% of survivors of acquired brain injury (ABI) experience persistent changes in sexuality. However, research on clinicians' perspectives in addressing sexuality issues post-ABI is limited. This study explored the attitudes and approaches, barriers and facilitators, and training preferences of Australian clinicians in addressing sexuality in individuals post-ABI. METHOD Purposive sampling was used to recruit 20 Australian multi-disciplinary clinicians from a related survey study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and qualitatively analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Three broad themes were identified: ABI results in multi-faceted changes in sexuality; there is a fundamental discomfort in talking about sexuality; and, strategies proposed by clinicians may help to improve sexuality support. Participants also provided suggestions for sexuality training, which they believed should start at university. CONCLUSION Most clinicians are aware of sexuality issues post-ABI but fail to adequately address sexuality in individuals post-ABI due to personal levels of discomfort, perpetuated by institutional factors. Therefore, participants believe that changes made at individual and institutional levels may increase sexuality support for individuals with ABI. However, further research on the causes and treatment of sexual problems and patient perspectives is required to provide the evidence-based guidelines and training programs that clinicians require.Implications for rehabilitationUp to half of individuals experience changes in sexuality after ABI that restrict quality of life and relationships.The consequences of ABI and their impacts on sexuality are understood by Australian clinicians but remain largely unaddressed due to individual discomfort, perpetuated by institutional factors.This study suggests that professional training targeted towards understanding, assessing and treating sexuality issues post-ABI may help to reduce the discomfort.Adjustments should also be made at individual, policy and procedural levels to ensure that sexuality is addressed within rehabilitation post-ABI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill H A Hwang
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elinor E Fraser
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marina G Downing
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fraser EE, Downing MG, Ponsford JL. Survey on the experiences, attitudes, and training needs of Australian healthcare professionals related to sexuality and service delivery in individuals with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2022; 32:2248-2268. [PMID: 34044727 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1934486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Following acquired brain injury (ABI), sexuality, self-esteem and practices are often negatively impacted. Whilst sexuality is recognized as an essential part of a person's life regardless of medical condition, it is poorly understood in the ABI rehabilitation context. This study examined current assessment and treatment practices for sexual health and wellbeing in ABI rehabilitation, including perceived barriers and facilitators to discussing sexuality with individuals after ABI. We also assessed the need for further education and training in this area. Two hundred and thirty-nine Australian healthcare professionals predominantly working with both traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke populations completed an online survey comprising thirty-four questions. The 12-item sexuality attitudes and beliefs survey (SABS) was included as an additional objective outcome measure. Findings suggest that healthcare professionals infrequently raise sexuality with individuals with ABI. Inadequate education and training, not knowing whose role it is and when to raise the topic, and the view that individuals with ABI will ask for the information were all identified as key barriers contributing to poor sexuality management after ABI. More education and training opportunities with greater access to resources are needed to facilitate the incorporation of sexuality into routine practice across the continuum of ABI care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor E Fraser
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marina G Downing
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fraser EE, Downing MG, Haines K, Bennett L, Olver J, Ponsford JL. Evaluating a Novel Treatment Adapting a Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Approach for Sexuality Problems after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single Case Design with Nonconcurrent Multiple Baselines. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123525. [PMID: 35743597 PMCID: PMC9225377 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been little progress in development of evidence-based interventions to improve sexuality outcomes for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of an individualised intervention using a cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) framework to treat sexuality problems after TBI. A nonconcurrent multiple baseline single-case design with 8-week follow-up and randomisation to multiple baseline lengths (3, 4, or 6 weeks) was repeated across nine participants (five female) with complicated mild–severe TBI (mean age = 46.44 years (SD = 12.67), mean post-traumatic amnesia = 29.14 days (SD = 29.76), mean time post-injury = 6.56 years (median = 2.50 years, SD = 10.11)). Treatment comprised eight weekly, individual sessions, combining behavioural, cognitive, and educational strategies to address diverse sexuality problems. Clinical psychologists adopted a flexible, patient-centred, and goal-orientated approach whilst following a treatment guide and accommodating TBI-related impairments. Target behaviour was subjective ratings of satisfaction with sexuality, measured three times weekly. Secondary outcomes included measures of sexuality, mood, self-esteem, and participation. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) was used to measure personally meaningful goals. Preliminary support was shown for intervention effectiveness, with most cases demonstrating sustained improvements in subjective sexuality satisfaction and GAS goal attainment. Based on the current findings, larger clinical trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor E. Fraser
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia; (M.G.D.); (K.H.); (L.B.); (J.L.P.)
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Marina G. Downing
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia; (M.G.D.); (K.H.); (L.B.); (J.L.P.)
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Kerrie Haines
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia; (M.G.D.); (K.H.); (L.B.); (J.L.P.)
| | - Linda Bennett
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia; (M.G.D.); (K.H.); (L.B.); (J.L.P.)
| | - John Olver
- Rehabilitation Medicine, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia;
| | - Jennie L. Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia; (M.G.D.); (K.H.); (L.B.); (J.L.P.)
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hicks A, Ponsford JL, Spitz G, Dore V, Krishnadas N, Roberts C, Rowe CC. Amyloid- and Tau Imaging in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cross-sectional Study. Neurology 2022; 99:e1131-e1141. [PMID: 36096678 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been promoted as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. There is evidence of elevated amyloid-β and tau, the pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease, immediately following TBI. It is not clear whether amyloid-β and tau remain elevated in the chronic period. To address this issue, we assessed amyloid-β and tau burden in long-term TBI survivors and healthy controls using PET imaging. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, we recruited individuals following a single moderate to severe TBI at least 10 years previously from an inpatient rehabilitation program. A demographically similar healthy control group was recruited from the community. PET data were acquired using 18F-NAV4694 (amyloid-β) and 18F-MK6240 (tau) tracers. Amyloid-β deposition was quantified using the Centiloid scale. Tau deposition was quantified using the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) in four regions of interest (ROI). As a secondary measure, PET scans were also visually read as positive or negative. We examined PET data in relation to time since injury and age at injury. PET data were analysed in a series of regression analyses. RESULTS The sample comprised 87 individuals with TBI (71.3% male; 28.7% female; M = 57.53 years, SD = 11.53) and 59 controls (59.3% male; 40.7% female; M = 60.34 years, SD = 11.97). Individuals with TBI did not have significantly higher 18F-NAV4694 Centiloid values (p = 0.067) or 18F-MK6240 tau SUVRs in any ROI (p = ≤ 0.001; SUVR greater for controls). Visual assessment was consistent with the quantification; individuals with TBI were not more likely than controls to have a positive amyloid-β (p = 0.505) or tau scan (p = 0.221). No associations were identified for amyloid-β or tau burden with time since injury (p = 0.057 to 0.332) or age at injury. DISCUSSION A single moderate to severe TBI was not associated with higher burden of amyloid-β or tau pathologies in the chronic period relative to healthy controls. Amyloid-β and tau burden did not show a significant increase with years since injury, and burden did not appear to be greater for those who were older at the time of injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Australia.
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Australia
| | - Vincent Dore
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, 3084, Australia.,CSIRO Health and Biosecurity Flagship, The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Parkville, 3052, Australia
| | - Natasha Krishnadas
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, 3084, Australia.,Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
| | - Caroline Roberts
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Australia
| | - Christopher C Rowe
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, 3084, Australia.,Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hicks AJ, Clay FJ, James AC, Hopwood M, Ponsford JL. Effectiveness of Pharmacotherapy for Depression after Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: an Umbrella Review. Neuropsychol Rev 2022; 33:393-431. [PMID: 35699850 PMCID: PMC10148771 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-022-09543-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Symptoms of depression are common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), impacting survivors' ability to return to work, participate in leisure activities, and placing strain on relationships. Depression symptoms post TBI are often managed with pharmacotherapy, however, there is little research evidence to guide clinical practice. There have been a number of recent systematic reviews examining pharmacotherapy for post TBI depression. The aim of this umbrella review was to synthesize systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for the management of post TBI depression in adults. Eligible reviews examined any pharmacotherapy against any comparators, for the treatment of depression in adults who had sustained TBI. Seven databases were searched, with additional searching of online journals, Research Gate, Google Scholar and the TRIP Medical Database to identify published and unpublished systematic reviews and meta-analyses in English up to May 2020. A systematic review of primary studies available between March 2018 and May 2020 was also conducted. Evidence quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Instruments. The results are presented as a narrative synthesis. Twenty-two systematic reviews were identified, of which ten reviews contained a meta-analysis. No new primary studies were identified in the systematic review. There was insufficient high quality and methodologically rigorous evidence to recommend prescribing any specific drug or drug class for post TBI depression. The findings do show, however, that depression post TBI is responsive to pharmacotherapy in at least some individuals. Recommendations for primary studies, systematic reviews and advice for prescribers is provided. Review Registration PROSPERO (CRD42020184915).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Ground Floor, 185-187 Hoddle St, Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, 3121, Australia.
| | - Fiona J Clay
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Southbank, Australia
| | - Amelia C James
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Ground Floor, 185-187 Hoddle St, Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, 3121, Australia
| | - Malcolm Hopwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Professorial Psychiatry Unit, Albert Road Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, 31 Albert Road, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Ground Floor, 185-187 Hoddle St, Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, 3121, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gould KR, Carminati JYJ, Ponsford JL. "They just say how stupid I was for being conned". Cyberscams and acquired brain injury: A qualitative exploration of the lived experience of survivors and close others. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2021; 33:325-345. [PMID: 34957919 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2021.2016447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) may be vulnerable to cyberscams due to their cognitive and psychosocial impairments. However, the lived experiences of cyberscam survivors with ABI and their close others is not understood, and no effective intervention has been identified. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of cyberscam survivors with ABI (n = 7) and their close others (n = 6). Semi-structured interviews explored the scam experience, impacts, vulnerabilities and interventions. Reflexive thematic analysis of interview transcripts identified seven themes: "who is at the helm?: vulnerabilities," "the lure: scammer tactics," "scammers aboard: scam experience," "the discovery," "sinking in: impacts," "responding to the mayday: responses from others," and "lifesavers: suggestions for intervention." The journey towards scam victimisation was complex, and complicated by the ABI. Cyberscams contributed to substantial financial disadvantage, loss of trust and shame. ABI related impairments and social isolation reportedly increased scam vulnerability and interfered with intervention attempts by family and professionals. Confusion, denial and disbelief created further barriers to discovery. The practical and emotional impacts on both cyberscam survivors with ABI and their family members, and a lack of effective intervention, highlight the need for increased education and awareness in order to improve online safety for those with ABI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate R Gould
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia
| | - Jao-Yue J Carminati
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Phyland RK, Ponsford JL, Carrier SL, Hicks AJ, McKay A. Agitated Behaviors following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence by Post-Traumatic Amnesia Status, Hospital Setting, and Agitated Behavior Type. J Neurotrauma 2021; 38:3047-3067. [PMID: 34435884 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2021.0257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Agitation is a common behavioral problem following traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, the precise proportion of patients who experience agitation in the early stages of recovery is unknown. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence of agitation in TBI patients undergoing inpatient care, and whether this prevalence differed by post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) status and setting (acute and rehabilitation). We also aimed to describe the prevalence of sub-types of agitated behavior (disinhibited, aggressive, and emotionally labile). We searched five databases and one clinical trials register, with additional review of websites and key journals to identify any relevant records up to July 2020. We included studies describing the proportion of hospitalized TBI patients age 16 years or older demonstrating agitated behavior. We included comparative studies with and without concurrent controls, randomized controlled trials, pseudo-randomized controlled trials, and case series. Methodological quality was critically appraised using a Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Sixteen studies met eligibility criteria, with a total of 5592 participants. The pooled prevalence of agitation was 31.73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.25%-39.00%) during inpatient care (acute and rehabilitation), 32.23% (95% CI, 27.13%-37.80%) during rehabilitative care and 44.06% (95% CI, 36.15%-52.28%) for inpatients in PTA specifically. Disinhibited behaviors were the most common. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies. Additional high-quality research featuring large samples, frequent and long-term measurement of agitation, use of validated scales, and consideration of variables such as PTA status will further improve estimates of agitation prevalence following TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruby K Phyland
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah L Carrier
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adam McKay
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Rehabilitation and Mental Health, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ponsford JL, Hicks AJ, Gould KR, Downing MG, Hopwood M, Feeney TJ. Positive Behaviour Support for adults with acquired brain injury and challenging behaviour: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 65:101604. [PMID: 34774810 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Challenging behaviours are common and disabling consequences of acquired brain injury (ABI), causing stress for close-others and disrupting community integration. Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) interventions have support from case studies as a means of reducing these behaviours, but controlled trials are lacking. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate, with a randomised waitlist-controlled trial, the efficacy of a 12-month PBS intervention, termed PBS+PLUS, in reducing challenging behaviours after ABI. METHODS Participants included 49 individuals with ABI (PBS+PLUS Intervention and Waitlist Treatment-as-usual groups) and their close-others. The design was a randomised waitlist-controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. PBS+PLUS involved setting collaborative goals toward a more meaningful life with the individual with ABI and addressing barriers to achieving these, including challenging behaviours, through skill-building, restructuring environments and executive strategies. The primary outcome measure was the Overt Behaviour Scale (OBS). The Challenging Behaviour Self-Efficacy Scale (CBSES) was a secondary outcome, assessing close-others' self-efficacy in addressing challenging behaviour. Measures were completed at baseline and every 4 months. Data analyses involved mixed-effects and negative binomial regressions examining change over time by group. RESULTS The PBS+PLUS Intervention group included 24 participants and the Waitlist group 25 participants. On the OBS, the Intervention group showed a significant reduction in challenging behaviour over the 12-month intervention. However, the Waitlist group showed similar improvement on the OBS over the 12-month waitlist period. The Waitlist group was not denied an intervention from other providers during this period. Gains continued for 8 months post-intervention. The PBS+PLUS intervention resulted in significantly greater gains in close-others' confidence in addressing challenging behaviours on the CBSES, relative to those in the Waitlist group, who showed no such gains. CONCLUSIONS Although we cannot say this intervention is more effective than any other, the study did show that PBS+PLUS can result in significant and sustained reductions in challenging behaviour in individuals with severe ABI and increased confidence of close-others in addressing these difficult behaviours. AUSTRALIAN NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: #ACTRN12616001704482.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Victoria, Australia; Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, 3121, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Victoria, Australia; Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, 3121, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate R Gould
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Victoria, Australia; Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, 3121, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marina G Downing
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Victoria, Australia; Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, 3121, Victoria, Australia
| | - Malcolm Hopwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tim J Feeney
- Belvedere Health Services and the Mill School, Essex Junction, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Connolly LJ, Ponsford JL, Rajaratnam SMW, Lockley SW. Development of a Home-Based Light Therapy for Fatigue Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Two Case Studies. Front Neurol 2021; 12:651498. [PMID: 34589041 PMCID: PMC8473693 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.651498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Fatigue and sleep disturbance negatively impact quality of life following brain injury and there are no established treatments. Building on research showing efficacy of blue light therapy delivered via a lightbox in reducing fatigue and daytime sleepiness after traumatic brain injury (TBI), this paper describes the development and implementation of a novel in-home light therapy to alleviate fatigue and sleep disturbance in two case studies. Methods: During the 8-week lighting intervention, participants' home lighting was adjusted to provide high intensity, blue-enriched (high melanopic) light all day as a stimulant and dimmer, blue-depleted (low melanopic) light for 3 h before sleep as a soporific. The sham 8-week control condition resembled participants' usual (baseline) lighting conditions (3,000-4,000 K all day). Lighting conditions were crossed-over. Outcomes were measures of fatigue, subjective daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, insomnia symptoms, psychomotor vigilance and mood. Case study participants were a 35-year old male (5 years post-TBI), and a 46-year-old female (22 years post-TBI). Results: The relative proportion of melanopic lux was greater in Treatment lighting than Control during daytime, and lower during evenings. Participants found treatment to be feasible to implement, and was well-tolerated with no serious side effects noted. Self-reported compliance was >70%. Both cases demonstrated reduced fatigue, sleep disturbance and insomnia symptoms during the treatment lighting intervention. Case 2 additionally showed reductions in daytime sleepiness and depressive symptoms. As expected, symptoms trended toward baseline levels during the control condition. Discussion: Treatment was positively received and compliance rates were high, with no problematic side-effects. Participants expressed interest in continuing the ambient light therapy in their daily lives. Conclusions: These cases studies demonstrate the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a personalized in-home dynamic light treatment for TBI patients, with evidence for efficacy in reducing fatigue and sleep disturbance. Clinical Trial Registration:www.anzctr.org.au, identifier: ACTRN12617000866303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Connolly
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shantha M W Rajaratnam
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Steven W Lockley
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Taing AS, Mundy ME, Ponsford JL, Spitz G. Temporal lobe activation during episodic memory encoding following traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep 2021; 11:18830. [PMID: 34552133 PMCID: PMC8458357 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97953-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The temporal lobes are critical for encoding and retrieving episodic memories. The temporal lobes are preferentially disrupted following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), likely contributing to the difficulties observed in episodic memory. However, the underlying neural changes that precipitate or maintain these difficulties in individuals with TBI remains poorly understood. Here, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to interrogate the relationship between temporal lobe activation and encoding of episodic stimuli. Participants encoded face, scene, and animal stimuli during an fMRI run. In an out-of-scanner task, participants were required to correctly identify previously displayed stimuli over two presentation runs (each in-scanner stimuli presented twice). Forty-three patients with moderate-severe TBI were recruited and compared with 38 demographically similar healthy controls. The pattern of behavioural performance between groups depended on the stimuli presentation run. The TBI group demonstrated poorer episodic memory for faces and scenes during the first presentation, but not the second presentation. When episodic memory was analysed across all presentation runs, behavioural deficits were only apparent for faces. Interestingly, processing of faces emerged as the only between group-difference on fMRI, whereby TBI participants had an increased signal in the middle temporal gyrus extending to the superior temporal sulcus. These findings provide evidence to suggest that following TBI: (a) episodic memory is preferentially impaired for complex stimuli such as faces, and (b) robust behavioural inefficiencies are reflected in increased activation in specific temporal lobe structures during encoding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbie S Taing
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, 185-187 Hoddle Street, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia
| | - Matthew E Mundy
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, 185-187 Hoddle Street, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, 185-187 Hoddle Street, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Taing AS, Mundy ME, Ponsford JL, Spitz G. Aberrant modulation of brain activity underlies impaired working memory following traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 31:102777. [PMID: 34343728 PMCID: PMC8350067 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Impaired working memory is a common and disabling consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that is caused by aberrant brain processing. However, little is known about the extent to which deficits are perpetuated by specific working memory subprocesses. Using a combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and working memory paradigm, we tested the hypothesis that the pattern of brain activation subserving working memory following TBI would interact with both task demands and specific working memory subcomponents: encoding, maintenance, and retrieval. Forty-three patients with moderate-severe TBI, of whom 25 were in the acute phase of recovery (M = 2.16 months, SD = 1.48 months, range = 0.69 - 6.64 months) and 18 in the chronic phase of recovery (M = 23.44 months, SD = 6.76 months, range = 13.35 - 34.82 months), were compared with 38 demographically similar healthy controls. Behaviourally, we found that working memory deficits were confined to the high cognitive load trials in both acute (P = 0.006) and chronic (P = 0.024) cohorts. Furthermore, results for a subset of the sample (18 chronic TBI and 17 healthy controls) who underwent fMRI revealed that the TBI group showed reduced brain activation when simply averaged across all task trials (regardless of cognitive load or subcomponent). However, interrogation of the subcomponents of working memory revealed a more nuanced pattern of activation. When examined more closely, patterns of brain activity following TBI were found to interact with both task demands and the working memory subcomponent: increased activation was observed during encoding in the left inferior occipital gyrus whereas decreased activation was apparent during maintenance in the bilateral cerebellum and left calcarine sulcus. Taken together, findings indicate an inability to appropriately modulate brain activity according to task demand that is specific to working memory encoding and maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbie S Taing
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Matthew E Mundy
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Connolly LJ, Rajaratnam SMW, Spitz G, Lockley SW, Ponsford JL. Factors Associated With Response to Pilot Home-Based Light Therapy for Fatigue Following Traumatic Brain Injury and Stroke. Front Neurol 2021; 12:651392. [PMID: 34335435 PMCID: PMC8319544 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.651392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Fatigue and sleep disturbance are common and debilitating problems after brain injury. Light therapy shows promise as a potential treatment. We conducted a trial of in-home light therapy to alleviate fatigue and sleep disturbance. The aim of the current study was to identify factors moderating treatment response. Methods: Participants were 24 individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (n = 19) or stroke (n = 5) reporting clinically significant fatigue. Outcomes included fatigue on Brief Fatigue Inventory (primary outcome), sleep disturbance on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, reaction time (RT) on Psychomotor Vigilance Task and time spent in productive activity. Interactions of demographic and clinical variables with these outcomes were examined in linear mixed-model analyses. Results: Whilst there were no variables found to be significantly associated with change in our primary outcome of fatigue, some variables revealed medium or large effect sizes, including chronotype, eye color, injury severity as measured by PTA, and baseline depressive symptoms. Chronotype significantly moderated sleep quality, with evening chronotype being associated with greater improvement during treatment. Injury type significantly predicted mean RT, with stroke participants exhibiting greater post-treatment reduction than TBI. Age significantly predicted productive activity during Treatment, with younger participants showing stronger Treatment effect. Conclusion: Light therapy may have a greater impact on sleep in younger individuals and those with an evening chronotype. Older individuals may need higher treatment dose to achieve benefit. Clinical Trial Registration:www.anzctr.org.au, identifier: ACTRN12617000866303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Connolly
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shantha M W Rajaratnam
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Steven W Lockley
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Connolly LJ, Rajaratnam SMW, Murray JM, Spitz G, Lockley SW, Ponsford JL. Home-based light therapy for fatigue following acquired brain injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol 2021; 21:262. [PMID: 34225698 PMCID: PMC8256500 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02292-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Fatigue and sleep disturbance are debilitating problems following brain injury and there are no established treatments. Building on demonstrated efficacy of blue light delivered via a lightbox in reducing fatigue and daytime sleepiness after TBI, this study evaluated the efficacy of a novel in-home light intervention in alleviating fatigue, sleep disturbance, daytime sleepiness and depressive symptoms, and in improving psychomotor vigilance and participation in daily productive activity, following injury METHODS: The impact of exposure to a dynamic light intervention (Treatment) was compared to usual lighting (Control) in a randomized within-subject, crossover trial. Outcomes were fatigue (primary outcome), daytime sleepiness, sleep disturbance, insomnia symptoms, psychomotor vigilance, mood and activity levels. Participants (N = 24, M ± SDage = 44.3 ± 11.4) had mild-severe TBI or stroke > 3 months previously, and self-reported fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale ≥ 4). Following 2-week baseline, participants completed each condition for 2 months in counter-balanced order, with 1-month follow-up. Treatment comprised daytime blue-enriched white light (CCT > 5000 K) and blue-depleted light (< 3000 K) 3 h prior to sleep. RESULTS Random-effects mixed-model analysis showed no significantly greater change in fatigue on the Brief Fatigue Inventory during Treatment, but a medium effect size of improvement (p = .33, d = -0.42). There were significantly greater decreases in sleep disturbance (p = .004), insomnia symptoms (p = .036), reaction time (p = .004) and improvements in productive activity (p = .005) at end of Treatment relative to Control, with large effect sizes (d > 0.80). Changes in other outcomes were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study provides preliminary support for in-home dynamic light therapy to address sleep-related symptoms in acquired brain injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 13 June 2017, www.anzctr.org.au , ACTRN12617000866303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Connolly
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia. .,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Shantha M W Rajaratnam
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.,Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jade M Murray
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Steven W Lockley
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.,Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hicks AJ, Clay FJ, James AC, Hopwood M, Ponsford JL. Effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for depression after traumatic brain injury in adults: an umbrella review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 19:1720-1734. [PMID: 33534290 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-20-00363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to synthesize systematic reviews of the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy vs any other comparator for the management of post-traumatic brain injury depression in adults. INTRODUCTION Depression following a traumatic brain injury can have a considerable impact on the life of the individual, their family members, and the health care system. There have been several recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses on pharmacologic treatment for depression caused by post-traumatic brain injury. These reviews differ in conduct, quality, and reporting, and have discordant results and conclusions. Therefore, an umbrella review can provide prescribers with a summary of the evidence. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review will consider systematic reviews of studies of adults 16 years or older who have sustained a traumatic brain injury of any severity at any time in the past, who are receiving pharmacotherapy for depression of any severity in any health care setting. Studies that include the following outcomes will be considered: change in symptoms of depression and occurrence of harms. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos, and PROSPERO will be searched, as well as Google Scholar, ResearchGate, TRIP Medical Database, and hand searching journals. There will be no restriction on publication date. Only systematic reviews published in English will be considered. Screening of articles, assessment of methodological quality, and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. A Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Summary of Findings will be presented. Data will be summarized in narrative form with supporting tables. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42020184915.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Fiona J Clay
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Southbank, VIC, Australia.,Professorial Psychiatry Unit Albert Road Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amelia C James
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Malcolm Hopwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Professorial Psychiatry Unit Albert Road Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hicks AJ, Spitz G, Rowe CC, Roberts CM, McKenzie DP, Ponsford JL. Does cognitive decline occur decades after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury? A prospective controlled study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2021; 32:1530-1549. [PMID: 33858304 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1914674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
This prospective controlled study examined long-term trajectories of neuropsychological performance in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to healthy controls, and the impact of IQ, age at injury, time since injury, and injury severity on change over time. Fifty-three individuals with moderate to severe TBI (60.37% male; M = 59.77 yrs, SD = 14.03), and 26 controls (46.15% male; M = 63.96 yrs, SD = 14.42) were studied prospectively (M = 12.72 yrs between assessments). Participants completed measures of premorbid IQ (Weschler Test of Adult Reading), processing speed (Digit Symbol Coding Test), working memory (Digit Span Backwards), memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test) and executive function (Trail Making Test Part B; Hayling Errors), at a mean of 10.62 yrs (Initial) and 23.91 yrs (Follow-Up) post injury. Individuals with TBI did not show a significantly greater decline in neuropsychological performance over time compared with demographically similar controls. There was no association between change over time with IQ, time since injury or injury severity. Being older at injury had a greater adverse impact on executive function at follow-up. In this small sample, a single moderate to severe TBI was not associated with ongoing cognitive decline up to three decades post injury. Changes in cognitive function were similar between the groups and likely reflect healthy aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christopher C Rowe
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg and Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Caroline M Roberts
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dean P McKenzie
- Research Development and Governance Unit, Epworth HealthCare Melbourne, Australia and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dimech-Betancourt B, Ponsford JL, Charlton JL, Ross PE, Gooden JR, Stolwyk RJ. Investigating feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a simulator-based driving intervention for people with acquired brain injury: A randomised controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2021; 35:1277-1289. [PMID: 33810776 DOI: 10.1177/02692155211002455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a driving simulator intervention on driving outcomes following acquired brain injury. DESIGN Pilot randomised controlled trial. SETTING Occupational therapy driver assessment and rehabilitation service. SUBJECTS Individuals post-acquired brain injury aiming to return to driving. INTERVENTION Eight sessions of simulated driver training over four weeks, in addition to usual care. Control: Usual care only. MAIN MEASURES Feasibility outcomes: Participant recruitment and retention; data completeness; therapy attendance and fidelity; adverse events. Performance outcomes: on-road driving performance; Simulator Sickness Questionnaire; Brain Injury Driving Self-Awareness Measure and Driving Comfort Scale - Daytime, assessed at baseline and five weeks post-randomisation. RESULTS Out of 523 individuals screened, 22 (4%) were recruited and randomised, with 20 completing their allocated group (n = 12 Simulator, n = 8 Usual Care). For those who completed training, session attendance was 100% with simulator sickness rated, on average, as mild. Six individuals (50%) in the Simulator group failed the on-road assessment, versus two (25%) in the Usual Care group (P = 0.373). On average, the Simulator group reported a positive change in confidence ratings (M = 5.77, SD = 13.96) compared to the Usual Care group, who reported a negative change (M = -6.97, SD = 8.47), P = 0.034. The Simulator group (M = 0.67, SD = 3.34) demonstrated no significant change in self-awareness relative to the Usual Care group (M = -0.83, SD = 1.83, P = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS With adjustments to inclusion criteria and recruitment strategies, it may be feasible to deliver the intervention and conduct a larger trial. There is potential benefit of simulator training for improving driver confidence after acquired brain injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bleydy Dimech-Betancourt
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Epworth Rehabilitation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Judith L Charlton
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Pamela E Ross
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Epworth Rehabilitation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - James R Gooden
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Renerus J Stolwyk
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bruijel J, van Heugten CM, Murray J, Grima N, Ymer L, Walters EM, Sinclair K, Stapert SZ, Vermeeren A, Ponsford JL. The bidirectional relationship between sleep and physical activity following traumatic brain injury. J Sleep Res 2021; 30:e13334. [PMID: 33719114 PMCID: PMC8519136 DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Sleep and physical activity are both modifiable behavioural factors that are associated with better health and are potentially related. Following traumatic brain injury, damage to the brain caused by an external force, sleep disturbances are common. Exploring bidirectional relationships between sleep and physical activity might provide insight into whether increasing physical activity could decrease these sleep disturbances. The current study, therefore, examined inter- and intra-individual temporal associations between sleep and daytime physical activity in 64 people with traumatic brain injury reporting sleep problems or fatigue (47 males; mean age, 40 years). Sleep and physical activity were measured using actigraphy with corroborating sleep diaries over 14 consecutive days. Multilevel models were used to examine inter- and intra-individual associations between physical activity and sleep. Inter-individual variations showed that earlier bedtimes, earlier wake-up times and lower sleep efficiency were associated with more physical activity. Intra-individual temporal variations showed no significant association of daytime physical activity with sleep duration or continuity. However, shorter sleep time and less wake after sleep onset than usual were associated with more time spent in light-intensity activity the next day. Therefore, sleep may have more of an influence on physical activity than physical activity has on sleep in people with traumatic brain injury. In conclusion, the results do not confirm a potential beneficial effect of physical activity on sleep but suggest that improving sleep quality might be relevant to support of a physically active lifestyle in people with traumatic brain injury. Further research is necessary to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Bruijel
- Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline M van Heugten
- Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jade Murray
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia
| | - Natalie Grima
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia.,Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Lucy Ymer
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia.,Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Elizabeth M Walters
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia
| | - Kelly Sinclair
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Sven Z Stapert
- Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical and Medical Psychology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemiek Vermeeren
- Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia.,Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Grima NA, Rajaratnam SMW, Mansfield D, McKenzie D, Ponsford JL. Poorer sleep quality predicts melatonin response in TBI patients: findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Sleep Med 2021; 17:1545-1551. [PMID: 33704046 DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.9234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES A recent clinical trial demonstrated that melatonin treatment was effective in improving self-perceived sleep quality in patients with TBI; however, it remains unclear which patients benefited from melatonin treatment. To that end, findings from the clinical trial were re-examined to identify possible predictors of treatment response. METHODS Hierarchical multiple regression was utilized to identify patient characteristics, TBI injury characteristics, and self-report measures assessing sleep, fatigue, mood, and anxiety symptomatology that may uniquely explain a change in self-reported sleep quality scores (follow-up minus baseline score) as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI). RESULTS After controlling for patient demographic and TBI injury-related variables, baseline self-report measures of sleep, fatigue, mood, and anxiety explained an additional 32% of the variance in change in PSQI scores. However, only baseline PSQI score made a unique and statistically significant contribution (β = -.56, p = .006). After controlling for patient and TBI characteristics, baseline PSQI scores further explained 27% of the variance in change in PSQI scores, R squared change = .27, F change (1, 27) = 11.79, p = .002). The standardized beta for baseline PSQI score revealed a statistically significant negative relationship with change in PSQI score (β = -.54, p = .002) revealing that higher PSQI score at baseline was associated with better sleep outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In a sample comprising predominately severe TBI and comorbid insomnia, participants who report poorer sleep quality have the most to gain from melatonin treatment irrespective of time since injury, demographics, fatigue, daytimes sleepiness, mood, and anxiety symptomology. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The manuscript reports on a clinical trial which was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on the 13th of July, 2011. Identifier: ACTRN12611000734965 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=343083&showOriginal=true&isReview=true.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie A Grima
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Shantha M W Rajaratnam
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Darren Mansfield
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Dean McKenzie
- Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, St. Kilda, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lawson DW, Stolwyk RJ, Ponsford JL, Wong D. Evaluating telehealth delivery of a compensatory memory rehabilitation programme following stroke: A single-case experimental design. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2021; 32:897-921. [PMID: 33678132 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1843500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Rehabilitation of memory remains an unmet need for many stroke survivors. Telehealth methods may provide a solution, however evidence supporting the efficacy of remotely-delivered therapy is needed. A non-concurrent multiple baseline design was used with randomized onset of intervention across five individuals with chronic stroke-related memory complaints. A six-week compensatory memory skills programme was delivered individually via internet videoconferencing. Target behaviours of frequencies of self-reported lapses of everyday and prospective memory were measured weekly across baseline, intervention, and follow-up phases. A secondary outcome of functional goal attainment was measured once per phase, with participants setting two personal rehabilitation goals. Data were analysed visually and statistically. Improvements in memory functioning were statistically significant on at least one measure of target behaviour for four out of five participants at intervention or follow-up. Visual evidence of level change indicated at least modest improvements for all participants by follow-up. All participants attained at least one functional goal by follow-up. High rates of treatment adherence and participant satisfaction were observed. Technological issues were minimal and did not impact content delivery or engagement. These results provide preliminary support for the efficacy of a telehealth-delivered rehabilitation programme in improving memory function and achieving memory-related goals for stroke survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Lawson
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renerus J Stolwyk
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dana Wong
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia.,School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Brehaut E, Neupane D, Levis B, Wu Y, Sun Y, Krishnan A, He C, Bhandari PM, Negeri Z, Riehm KE, Rice DB, Azar M, Yan XW, Imran M, Chiovitti MJ, Saadat N, Cuijpers P, Ioannidis JPA, Markham S, Patten SB, Ziegelstein RC, Henry M, Ismail Z, Loiselle CG, Mitchell ND, Tonelli M, Boruff JT, Kloda LA, Beraldi A, Braeken APBM, Carter G, Clover K, Conroy RM, Cukor D, da Rocha E Silva CE, De Souza J, Downing MG, Feinstein A, Ferentinos PP, Fischer FH, Flint AJ, Fujimori M, Gallagher P, Goebel S, Jetté N, Julião M, Keller M, Kjærgaard M, Love AW, Löwe B, Martin-Santos R, Michopoulos I, Navines R, O'Rourke SJ, Öztürk A, Pintor L, Ponsford JL, Rooney AG, Sánchez-González R, Schwarzbold ML, Sharpe M, Simard S, Singer S, Stone J, Tung KY, Turner A, Walker J, Walterfang M, White J, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Depression prevalence using the HADS-D compared to SCID major depression classification: An individual participant data meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 2020; 139:110256. [PMID: 33069051 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Validated diagnostic interviews are required to classify depression status and estimate prevalence of disorder, but screening tools are often used instead. We used individual participant data meta-analysis to compare prevalence based on standard Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - depression subscale (HADS-D) cutoffs of ≥8 and ≥11 versus Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression and determined if an alternative HADS-D cutoff could more accurately estimate prevalence. METHODS We searched Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations via Ovid, PsycINFO, and Web of Science (inception-July 11, 2016) for studies comparing HADS-D scores to SCID major depression status. Pooled prevalence and pooled differences in prevalence for HADS-D cutoffs versus SCID major depression were estimated. RESULTS 6005 participants (689 SCID major depression cases) from 41 primary studies were included. Pooled prevalence was 24.5% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 20.5%, 29.0%) for HADS-D ≥8, 10.7% (95% CI: 8.3%, 13.8%) for HADS-D ≥11, and 11.6% (95% CI: 9.2%, 14.6%) for SCID major depression. HADS-D ≥11 was closest to SCID major depression prevalence, but the 95% prediction interval for the difference that could be expected for HADS-D ≥11 versus SCID in a new study was -21.1% to 19.5%. CONCLUSIONS HADS-D ≥8 substantially overestimates depression prevalence. Of all possible cutoff thresholds, HADS-D ≥11 was closest to the SCID, but there was substantial heterogeneity in the difference between HADS-D ≥11 and SCID-based estimates. HADS-D should not be used as a substitute for a validated diagnostic interview.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Brehaut
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Dipika Neupane
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Brooke Levis
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - Yin Wu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Ying Sun
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Ankur Krishnan
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Chen He
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Parash Mani Bhandari
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Zelalem Negeri
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Kira E Riehm
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Danielle B Rice
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Marleine Azar
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Xin Wei Yan
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Mahrukh Imran
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Matthew J Chiovitti
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Nazanin Saadat
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Department of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Sarah Markham
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Scott B Patten
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Cuthbertson & Fischer Chair in Pediatric Mental Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Roy C Ziegelstein
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Melissa Henry
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Zahinoor Ismail
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Neuroscience and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Carmen G Loiselle
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Nursing Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Nicholas D Mitchell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Marcello Tonelli
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Jill T Boruff
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Lorie A Kloda
- Library, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Anna Beraldi
- kbo Lech-Mangfall-Klinik für Psychatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychsomatik, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Bayern, Germany.
| | - Anna P B M Braeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Faculty of Psychology, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Gregory Carter
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; Calvary Mater Newcastle, Australia.
| | - Kerrie Clover
- Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
| | - Ronán M Conroy
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Division of Population Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
| | | | - Carlos E da Rocha E Silva
- Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Jennifer De Souza
- Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Marina G Downing
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Anthony Feinstein
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Panagiotis P Ferentinos
- 2nd Department of Psychiatry, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
| | - Felix H Fischer
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Alastair J Flint
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Maiko Fujimori
- Section of Psychological Science, Division of Health Care Research, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | - Simone Goebel
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Nathalie Jetté
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Miguel Julião
- Equipa Comunitária de Suporte em Cuidados Paliativos de Sintra, Portugal.
| | - Monika Keller
- Division of Psychooncology, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Marie Kjærgaard
- Endocrinology Research Group, Medical Clinic, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway; Department of Internal Medicine, Kolding Hospital, Hospital Lillebaelt, Denmark.
| | - Anthony W Love
- Department of Psychology, Victoria University, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Bernd Löwe
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Rocio Martin-Santos
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medicine, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Ioannis Michopoulos
- 2nd Department of Psychiatry, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Ricard Navines
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medicine, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Suzanne J O'Rourke
- School of Health in Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Suzanne.O'
| | | | - Luis Pintor
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Augusto Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Consultation Liaison Psychiatry Unit, Hospital Clínico de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Alasdair G Rooney
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Robert Fergusson Unit, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Roberto Sánchez-González
- Department of Psychiatry, Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiccions, Centre Emili Mira, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Marcelo L Schwarzbold
- Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
| | - Michael Sharpe
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Sébastien Simard
- Département des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Québec, Canada; Centre intersectoriel en santé durable (CISD), Québec, Canada; Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Québec, Canada.
| | - Susanne Singer
- University Medical Centre Mainz, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Jon Stone
- Department of Neurology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | | | - Alyna Turner
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| | - Jane Walker
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Mark Walterfang
- Neuropsychiatry Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Jennifer White
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrea Benedetti
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Brett D Thombs
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hicks AJ, Clay FJ, Hopwood M, James AC, Perry LA, Jayaram M, Batty R, Ponsford JL. Efficacy and Harms of Pharmacological Interventions for Anxiety after Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review. J Neurotrauma 2020; 38:519-528. [PMID: 33045912 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
After a traumatic brain injury (TBI), many persons experience significant and debilitating problems with anxiety. The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the evidence regarding efficacy of pharmacological interventions for anxiety after TBI. We reviewed studies published in English before July 2020 and included original research on pharmacological interventions for anxiety after TBI in adults ≥16 years of age. MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL databases were searched, with additional searching of key journals, clinical trials registries, and international drug regulators. The primary outcomes of interest were reduction in symptoms of anxiety and occurrence of harms. The secondary outcomes of interest were changes in depression, cognition, quality of life, and participation. Data were summarized in a narrative synthesis, and evidence quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Only a single non-peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trial of 19 male military service members with mild TBI met inclusion criteria. This study found no significant effect of citalopram on anxiety symptoms over a 12-week intervention. The trial was stopped early because of poor recruitment, and much of the study detail was not included in the report. The methodological quality of the study was difficult to assess because of the lack of detail. No recommendations could be drawn from this review. There is a critical need for adequately powered and controlled studies of pharmacological interventions for anxiety after TBI across all severities that examine side-effect profiles and consider issues of comorbidity and effects of long-term pharmacotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fiona J Clay
- Department of Psychiatry, Albert Road Clinic, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Southbank, Victoria, Australia.,Professorial Psychiatry Unit, Albert Road Clinic, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Malcolm Hopwood
- Department of Psychiatry, Albert Road Clinic, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Professorial Psychiatry Unit, Albert Road Clinic, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amelia C James
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Luke A Perry
- Department of Psychiatry, Albert Road Clinic, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mahesh Jayaram
- Department of Psychiatry, Albert Road Clinic, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel Batty
- Department of Psychiatry, Albert Road Clinic, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Carrier SL, Hicks AJ, Ponsford JL, McKay A. Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for managing agitation during post-traumatic amnesia following traumatic brain injury: a systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 19:499-512. [PMID: 33165180 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-20-00216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize current evidence on the effects and harms of non-pharmacological interventions for managing agitation during post-traumatic amnesia in adults who have sustained a traumatic brain injury. INTRODUCTION Agitation is one of the most disruptive and clinically significant sequelae observed during post-traumatic amnesia. Patients who experience agitation during this period demonstrate reduced engagement in rehabilitation and poorer long-term functional outcomes. Agitation also poses a risk to staff and patient safety. Research for the effects of pharmacological intervention for managing agitation during this period is inconclusive. Thus, synthesis of the research for non-pharmacological interventions for reducing agitation during post-traumatic amnesia is essential for improving long-term outcomes for survivors of traumatic brain injury. INCLUSION CRITERIA Studies will be considered if they include participants aged 16 years and older who exhibit agitated behaviors during post-traumatic amnesia after sustaining a traumatic brain injury (irrespective of severity or mechanism). Studies will be considered if they evaluate any non-pharmacological intervention for reducing agitation, with all types of comparators accepted. Primary outcomes of interest include a change in agitation severity and any adverse effects. METHODS Key information sources include MEDLINE Ovid SP interface, PubMed, CINAHL, Excerpta Medica Database, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies published in English will be included, irrespective of publication year. Two independent reviewers will be involved in study selection and data extraction. Eligible studies will be critically appraised for methodological quality. Studies will be pooled with statistical meta-analysis where possible; otherwise findings will be reported in narrative form. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42020186802.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Carrier
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Rehabilitation and Mental Health Division, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Adam McKay
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Rehabilitation and Mental Health Division, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Phyland RK, McKay A, Olver J, Walterfang M, Hopwood M, Hicks AJ, Mortimer D, Ponsford JL. Use of olanzapine to treat agitation in traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:662. [PMID: 32690072 PMCID: PMC7370410 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04553-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Agitation is common in the early stages of recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI), when patients are in post-traumatic amnesia (PTA). Agitation is associated with risk of harm to patients and caregivers. Recent guidelines recommend that agitation during PTA is managed using environmental modifications. Agitation is also frequently treated pharmacologically, with the use of atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine among the most common. This is despite a lack of well-designed studies to support the use of antipsychotics within this context. This study will be a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial. We will examine the efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and outcomes associated with the use of olanzapine for reducing agitation in patients in PTA following TBI over and above recommended environmental management. Methods Fifty-eight TBI rehabilitation inpatients who are in PTA and are agitated will receive olanzapine or placebo for the duration of PTA. All participants will additionally receive optimal environmental management for agitation. Measures of agitation, PTA and health will be undertaken at baseline. Treatment administration will begin at a dose of 5 mg daily and may be escalated to a maximum dose of 20 mg per day. Throughout the treatment period, agitation and PTA will be measured daily, and adverse events monitored weekly. Efficacy will be assessed by treatment group comparison of average Agitated Behaviour Scale scores during PTA. Participants will cease treatment upon emergence from PTA. Agitation levels will continue to be monitored for a further 2 weeks, post-treatment measures of health will be undertaken and cognitive and functional status will be assessed. Level of agitation and functional health will be assessed at hospital discharge. At 3 months post-discharge, functional outcomes and health service utilisation will be measured. Discussion This trial will provide crucial evidence to inform the management of agitation in patients in PTA following TBI. It will provide guidance as to whether olanzapine reduces agitation over and above recommended environmental management or conversely whether it increases or prolongs agitation and PTA, increases length of inpatient hospitalisation and impacts longer term cognitive and functional outcomes. It will also speak to the safety and cost-effectiveness of olanzapine use in this population. Trial registration ANZCTR ACTRN12619000284167. Registered on 25 February 2019
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruby K Phyland
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, 185-187 Hoddle Street, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia. .,School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia. .,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Level 5, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
| | - Adam McKay
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, 185-187 Hoddle Street, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia.,School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Level 5, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.,Department of Psychology, Epworth HealthCare, 29 Erin Street, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia
| | - John Olver
- Rehabilitation Medicine, Epworth HealthCare, 89 Bridge Rd, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia
| | - Mark Walterfang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 1 North Block, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.,Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia.,Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, 30 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Malcolm Hopwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 1 North Block, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.,Albert Road Clinic Professorial Psychiatry Unit, University of Melbourne, 31 Albert Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, 185-187 Hoddle Street, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia.,School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Level 5, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia
| | - Duncan Mortimer
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Building H, Level 5, Caulfield Campus, Clayton, Victoria, 3145, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, 185-187 Hoddle Street, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia.,School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.,Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Level 5, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lawson DW, Stolwyk RJ, Ponsford JL, Baker KS, Tran J, Wong D. Acceptability of telehealth in post-stroke memory rehabilitation: A qualitative analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 32:1-21. [PMID: 32677539 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1792318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite evidence of the efficacy of telerehabilitation post-stroke, uptake has lagged behind the development of available technology, slowed by low confidence in user experience. We aimed to explore the issue of acceptability by characterizing the experience of telerehabilitation for service providers and consumers of a memory rehabilitation program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine clinicians (Mage = 33.29; SD = 7.37; range 25-44) and 25 stroke survivors with memory difficulties (Mage = 54.12; SD = 10.99; range 36-82) following a 6-week compensatory memory skills program delivered via in-home videoconferencing. Thematic analysis identified a range of perspectives under three overarching themes: (1) Content and Delivery; (2) Relationship and Connection; and (3) The Role and Benefits of Telerehabilitation. Reports from both respondent groups were overwhelmingly positive about the telerehabilitation experience and identified the benefits of increasing service availability. Videoconferencing technology was usable and occasional reliability issues were not a barrier. Users identified a range of benefits and challenges regarding communication, rapport building, and integration of rehabilitation in the home environment. Furthermore, most stroke survivors reported benefit from the intervention, via the acquisition of memory strategies and improved self-confidence through better understanding of their deficits. Overall, telerehabilitation of memory was acceptable to users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Lawson
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renerus J Stolwyk
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Katharine S Baker
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joanna Tran
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dana Wong
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dimech-Betancourt B, Ponsford JL, Charlton JL, Ross PE, Stolwyk RJ. User experiences and perspectives of a driving simulator intervention for individuals with acquired brain injury: A qualitative study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 31:773-796. [PMID: 32114901 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1731555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Driving a motor vehicle is a common rehabilitation goal following acquired brain injury (ABI). There is increasing interest in the use of driving simulators for driver rehabilitation post-ABI; however, there is still limited research demonstrating efficacy and acceptability. This study sought to examine the user experience of a driving simulator intervention for ABI survivors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 individuals, including 12 ABI survivors (42% male; Mean age = 53.92 years, SD age = 17.63) who completed the intervention, and 2 occupational therapist driver assessors who facilitated the intervention. Thematic analysis was adopted to analyse interview data. Findings suggest that individual differences (e.g., anxiety, previous experience) influenced participant response to training. The intervention allowed participants to practise various driving skills, re-familiarize themselves with the task of driving, and prepare for return to on-road driving within a safe environment. The intervention was perceived to be useful for enhancing driver self-awareness, autonomy, confidence and patience. Fidelity and simulator sickness were considered limitations of the simulator technology. Subjective accounts of the appropriateness of intervention components are also documented. Overall, the simulator intervention was reported to be a positive experience for participants. Themes emerging from this study can inform future driving simulator interventions for ABI survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bleydy Dimech-Betancourt
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Australia
| | - Jennie L Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Australia.,Epworth Rehabilitation, Richmond, Australia
| | - Judith L Charlton
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Pamela E Ross
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Australia.,Epworth Rehabilitation, Richmond, Australia
| | - Renerus J Stolwyk
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Australia
| |
Collapse
|