1
|
Morison LD, van Reyk O, Forbes E, Rouxel F, Faivre L, Bruinsma F, Vincent M, Jacquemont ML, Dykzeul NL, Geneviève D, Amor DJ, Morgan AT. CDK13-related disorder: a deep characterization of speech and language abilities and addition of 33 novel cases. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:793-804. [PMID: 36599938 PMCID: PMC10325997 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01275-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Speech and language impairments are central features of CDK13-related disorder. While pathogenic CDK13 variants have been associated with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), a systematic characterisation of communication has not been conducted. Here we examined speech, language, non-verbal communication skills, social behaviour and health and development in 41 individuals with CDK13-related disorder from 10 countries (male = 22, median-age 7 years 1 month, range 1-25 years; 33 novel). Most participants used augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in early childhood (24/41). CAS was common (14/22). Performance varied widely across intellectual ability, social behaviour and expressive language skills, with participants ranging from within average through to the severely impaired range. Receptive language was significantly stronger than expressive language ability. Social motivation was a relative strength. In terms of a broader health phenotype, a quarter had one or more of: renal, urogenital, musculoskeletal, and cardiac malformations, vision impairment, ear infections and/or sleep disturbance. All had gross and fine motor impairments (41/41). Other conditions included mild-moderate intellectual disability (16/22) and autism (7/41). No genotype-phenotype correlations were found. Recognition of CAS, a rare speech disorder, is required to ensure appropriately targeted therapy. The high prevalence of speech and language impairment underscores the importance of tailored speech therapy, particularly early access to AAC supports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lottie D Morison
- Speech and Language, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Olivia van Reyk
- Speech and Language, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elana Forbes
- Speech and Language, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Flavien Rouxel
- Génétique Clinique, Départment de Génétique Médicale, Maladies Rares et Médecine Personnalisée, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University, Centre de Référence Anomalies du Développement SOOR, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurence Faivre
- Centre de Référence Anomalies du Développment et Syndromes Malformatifs, FHU TRANSLAD, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France
- Genetics of Developmental Disorders, INSERM - Bourgogne Franche-Comté Univeristy, Dijon, France
| | | | - Marie Vincent
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, Nantes, France
| | | | - Natalie L Dykzeul
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford Children's Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - David Geneviève
- Génétique Clinique, Départment de Génétique Médicale, Maladies Rares et Médecine Personnalisée, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University, Centre de Référence Anomalies du Développement SOOR, Montpellier, France
| | - David J Amor
- Speech and Language, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Angela T Morgan
- Speech and Language, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clarke ZC, Judge S, Fryer K, Cunningham S, Toogood J, Hawley MS. A qualitative study exploring the effect of communicating with partially intelligible speech. Augment Altern Commun 2023:1-13. [PMID: 37262383 DOI: 10.1080/07434618.2023.2206910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Few studies have investigated how individuals with partially intelligible speech choose to communicate, including how, when, and why they might use a speech-generating device (SGD). This study aimed to add to the literature by exploring how this group of individuals use different communication strategies. Qualitative interviews were carried out with 10 participants with partially intelligible speech with the aim of investigating participants' perceptions of modes of communication and communication strategies. Transcripts were analyzed using Framework Analysis to investigate the role of SGDs alongside other communication strategies. Factors that influence why, when, and how a person chooses to communicate were identified and these were interpreted as an explanatory model of communication with partially intelligible speech. Participants described how they made the decision whether to attempt to communicate at all and then which communication method to use. Decision-making was influenced by the importance of the message, how much time is available, past experience, and the communication partner. Each communication attempt adds to an individuals' experience of communicating and influences subsequent decisions. This study suggests that individuals with partially intelligible speech are at risk of reduced communication environments and networks and that current SGDs may not be designed in a way that recognizes their particular needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë Charlotte Clarke
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Simon Judge
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kate Fryer
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Toogood
- Disability Theorist and Dysarthria Speaker, JPT Writing, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mark S Hawley
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leonet O, Orcasitas-Vicandi M, Langarika-Rocafort A, Mondragon NI, Etxebarrieta GR. A Systematic Review of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Interventions for Children Aged From 0 to 6 Years. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2022; 53:894-920. [PMID: 35759607 DOI: 10.1044/2022_lshss-21-00191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review evaluates the latest available evidence regarding augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions in children from 0 to 6 years old diagnosed with various disabilities. METHOD A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (OVID), PsycINFO (EBSCO), ERIC (ProQuest), SCIELO (WOS), Teacher Reference Center (EBSCO), and Education Database (ProQuest), and studies on AAC interventions in children from 0 to 6 years old diagnosed with various disabilities were selected independently by two reviewers (A.L.-R. and N.I.M.) according to the purpose of the review. RESULTS Twenty-nine of 1,709 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed, and the characteristics and results of the studies were extracted by a descriptive analysis (O.L.S. and M.O.-V.). CONCLUSION This analysis revealed that children with different diagnoses show improvements in expressive and receptive communication, functional communication behaviors, communication participation skills, interaction strategies, and symbol and multisymbol production and comprehension by using various AAC systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oihana Leonet
- Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education, Philosophy and Anthropology, University of the Basque Country, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Maria Orcasitas-Vicandi
- Department of English and German Philology, Translation and Interpretating, Faculty of Letters, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Argia Langarika-Rocafort
- Department of Didactics of Musical, Plastic and Body Expression, Faculty of Education of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain
| | - Nahia Idoiaga Mondragon
- Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain
| | - Gorka Roman Etxebarrieta
- Department of Didactics of Language and Literature, Faculty of Education of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Biggs EE, Carter EW, Gilson CB. Systematic Review of Interventions Involving Aided AAC Modeling for Children With Complex Communication Needs. AMERICAN JOURNAL ON INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2018; 123:443-473. [PMID: 30198767 DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-123.5.443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Building the communicative competence of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) requires intervention and support. This systematic review examined experimental studies involving aided AAC modeling to promote the expressive communication of children and youth (i.e., birth to age 21) with complex communication needs. A search yielded 48 studies involving 267 participants. Interventions were categorized according to three different approaches to aided AAC modeling-augmented input, models as prompts, and models within instructional demonstrations. Although the procedures varied, interventions were generally effective at improving diverse measures of expressive communication. This review provides insight for both researchers and practitioners by describing interventions involving three distinct approaches to aided AAC modeling, highlighting areas needing future research, and offering implications for practice.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gevarter C, O'Reilly MF, Rojeski L, Sammarco N, Lang R, Lancioni GE, Sigafoos J. Comparing communication systems for individuals with developmental disabilities: a review of single-case research studies. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2013; 34:4415-32. [PMID: 24377101 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Studies that have compared different communication systems for individuals with developmental disabilities were systematically reviewed in an effort to provide information useful for clinical decision making and directions for future research. Specifically, 28 studies that compared (a) non-electronic picture systems to speech generating devices, (b) aided AAC (e.g. picture exchange systems and SGDs) to unaided AAC systems (manual sign), or (c) AAC to speech-language interventions were included in this review. Dependent variables forming the basis for comparison included: (a) effectiveness (e.g. acquisition of systems and/or rate of use), (b) efficiency or rate of skill acquisition (c) participants' preference for systems, (d) occurrence of vocalizations and problem behavior, and (e) generalization across communication partners, settings, and time (i.e. maintenance). Results suggest that clear and consistent differences between communication systems are rare, precluding definitive statements regarding a universal best approach for all people with developmental disabilities. Instead, findings of this review support the consideration of an individual's existing skills, goals and preferences as part of the process of selecting an approach to communication.
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Meer L, Kagohara D, Achmadi D, O'Reilly MF, Lancioni GE, Sutherland D, Sigafoos J. Speech-generating devices versus manual signing for children with developmental disabilities. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2012; 33:1658-69. [PMID: 22554812 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2012] [Accepted: 04/05/2012] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
We compared speed of acquisition and preference for using a speech-generating device (SGD) versus manual signing (MS) as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) options. Four children with developmental disabilities (DD), aged 5-10 years, were taught to request preferred objects using an iPod(®)-based SGD and MS. Intervention was introduced in a multiple-probe across participants design and SGD and MS conditions were compared in an alternating treatments design. A systematic choice-making paradigm was implemented to determine if the children showed a preference for using SGD or MS. All participants showed increased use of SGD when intervention was introduced, but only three learned under the MS condition. Three participants exhibited a preference for the SGD while the remaining participant demonstrated a preference for using MS. Results support previous studies showing that individuals with DD often show a preference for different AAC options and extend previous data by suggesting that acquisition and maintenance was better for the preferred option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larah van der Meer
- School of Educational Psychology and Pedagogy, Victoria University of Wellington, Karori, Wellington, New Zealand.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rispoli MJ, Franco JH, van der Meer L, Lang R, Camargo SPH. The use of speech generating devices in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. Dev Neurorehabil 2010; 13:276-93. [PMID: 20629594 DOI: 10.3109/17518421003636794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review synthesizes communication interventions that involved the use of speech generating devices (SGD) for individuals with developmental disabilities. METHODS Systematic searches of electronic databases, journals and reference lists identified 35 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. These studies were evaluated in terms of (a) participants, (b) SGD function, (c) SGD characteristics, (d) intervention procedures, (e) intervention results and (f) certainty of evidence. RESULTS Across these studies, intervention was provided to a total of 86 participants aged 1-42 years. Communication skills targeted included requesting, social or conversational skills, labelling items and receptive language. Intervention approaches were categorized as using Discrete Trial Training, Milieu teaching or a combined instructional approach. Positive outcomes were reported in 86% of the studies with 54% of studies categorized as providing conclusive evidence. CONCLUSION This literature base is considered promising due to the large number of conclusive studies and the replication of intervention approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy Jenkins Rispoli
- Texas A & M University, Educational Psychology, 4225 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4225, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schlosser R. Comparative efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/07434619912331278575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
9
|
Schlosser R, Lee D. Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research. Augment Altern Commun 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/07434610012331279074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
10
|
Blischak D, Lloyd L. Augmentative and alternative communication in developing countries: challenge of the future. Augment Altern Commun 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/07434619612331277468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
11
|
Iacono T, Duncum J. Comparison of Sign alone and in combination with an electronic communication device in early language intervention: Case study. Augment Altern Commun 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/07434619512331277389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
12
|
Balandin S, Iacono T. AAC and Australian speech pathologists: report on a national survey. Augment Altern Commun 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/07434619812331278416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
13
|
Vaughn B, Horner R. Effects of concrete versus verbal choice systems on problem behavior. Augment Altern Commun 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/07434619512331277179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
14
|
Pennington L, Marshall J, Goldbart J. Describing participants in AAC research and their communicative environments: Guidelines for research and practice. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 29:521-35. [PMID: 17453973 DOI: 10.1080/09638280600902794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE People who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) vary widely in their skills and communication needs. Interventions have been developed to meet different needs, but have met with varied success. Attempts to discover why interventions succeed or fail are hindered by the lack of detailed description of the research participants and the environments in which they communicate. This paper reviews the information commonly given about AAC research participants and presents guidelines for the description of people who use AAC, their conversation partners and their communicative environments. METHOD Electronic databases were searched for AAC intervention research reports published between 1990 and 2004. Data on research participants and their communication environments were extracted from reviewed papers. Information given in published papers and variables known to affect communication were presented to an expert group. A modified Nominal Group technique was used to decide what information should be reported in AAC intervention research. RESULTS Guidelines for participant description that link with the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health were developed from the results of the nominal group. CONCLUSIONS Detailed information is needed to demonstrate efficacy of AAC interventions. Guidelines for participant description are presented and discussion of their utility is now needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Pennington
- Child Health, Clinical Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Taylor R, Iacono T. AAC and scripting activities to facilitate communication and play. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/14417040510001669111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
16
|
Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Cuvo AJ, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Didden R. PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: an overview of the literature. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2007; 28:468-88. [PMID: 16887326 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2006] [Accepted: 06/28/2006] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the literature dealing with the use of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) and voice output communication aids (VOCAs) for promoting the performance of requests by students with developmental disabilities. Computerized and manual searches were carried out to identify the studies published during the last 15 years (i.e., the period between 1992 and 2006 during which PECS and VOCA approaches became popular). Thirty-seven studies were identified and then divided into three groups concerning the use of the PECS or equivalents, the use of VOCAs or equivalents, and the comparison of both these approaches, respectively. Of the 173 students involved in studies using the PECS or equivalents only three could be considered failures, while a fourth one did not progress in the program due to illness. Similarly, of the 39 students who used VOCAs or equivalents only three could be considered failures, while one was partly successful. Finally, of the 11 students involved in the comparisons between PECS and VOCAs none could be classified as a failure. The results are very encouraging but methodological concerns and the relatively limited use of the systems in terms of request items and request opportunities suggest caution. Caution may also be needed in interpreting the reported similarities between the two systems in usability and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio E Lancioni
- Department of Psychology, University of Bari, Via Quintino Sella 268, 70100 Bari, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schlosser RW, Sigafoos J. Augmentative and alternative communication interventions for persons with developmental disabilities: narrative review of comparative single-subject experimental studies. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2006; 27:1-29. [PMID: 16360073 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2004] [Revised: 04/13/2004] [Accepted: 04/24/2004] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as an area of clinical and educational practice involves a myriad of decisions related to the symbols, devices, and strategies from which each client must choose. These decision-making points can be productively informed through evidence from comparative intervention studies. The purpose of this review was to synthesize comparative AAC intervention studies using single-subject experimental designs involving participants with developmental disabilities. Following a systematic search, each qualifying study was reviewed in terms of a priori determined appraisal criteria, and summarized in tabular format. Studies were divided into three groups according to their study of aided approaches, unaided approaches, or a combination of both. Results are discussed in terms of methodological adequacy of the studies and their implications for future research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf W Schlosser
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Northeastern University, 151C Forsyth, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pennington L, Goldbart J, Marshall J. Speech and language therapy to improve the communication skills of children with cerebral palsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 2004:CD003466. [PMID: 15106204 PMCID: PMC8407241 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003466.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The production of speech, language and gesture for communication is often affected by cerebral palsy. Communication difficulties associated with cerebral palsy can be multifactorial, arising from motor, intellectual and / or sensory impairments, and children with this diagnosis can experience mild to severe difficulties in expressing themselves. They are often referred to speech and language therapy (SLT) services, to maximise their communication skills and help them to take an independent a role as possible in interaction. This can include introducing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, such as symbol charts or speech synthesizers, as well treating children's natural forms of communication. Various strategies have been used to treat the communication disorders associated with cerebral palsy but evidence of their effectiveness is limited. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of SLT that focuses on the child or their familiar communication partners, as measured by change in interaction patterns. To determine if individual types of SLT intervention are more effective than others in changing interaction patterns. SEARCH STRATEGY Searches were conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PSYCH INFO, LLBA, ERIC, WEB of SCIENCE, NRR, BEI, SIGLE up to December 2002. References from identified studies were examined and relevant journals and conference reports were hand-searched. SELECTION CRITERIA Any experimental study containing an element of control was included in this review. This includes non-randomised group studies and single case experimental designs in which two interventions were compared or two communication processes were examined. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS L Pennington searched for and selected studies for inclusion. J Goldbart and J Marshall independently assessed separate random samples each comprising 25% of all identified studies. Two reviewers independently abstracted data from each selected study. Disagreements were settled by discussion between the three reviewers. MAIN RESULTS Eleven studies were included in the review. Seven studies evaluated treatment given directly to children, four investigated the effects of training for communication partners. Subjects in the studies varied widely in age, type and severity of cerebral palsy, cognitive and linguistic skills. Studies focusing directly on children suggest that this model of therapy delivery has been associated with increases in treated communication skills by individual children. However, methodological flaws prevent firm conclusions being made about the effectiveness of therapy. In addition, maintenance of these skills was not investigated thoroughly. The studies targeting communication partners describe small exploratory group projects which contain insufficient detail to allow replication, have very low power and cannot provide evidence of effectiveness of this type of treatment. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS Firm evidence of the positive effects of SLT for children with cerebral palsy has not been demonstrated by this review. However, positive trends in communication change were shown. No change in practice is recommended from this review. Further research is needed to describe this client group, and its possible clinical subgroups, and the methods of treatment currently used in SLT. Research is also needed to investigate the effectiveness of new and established interventions and their acceptability to families. Rigour in research practice needs to be extended to enable firm associations between therapy and communication change to be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Pennington
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health and SocietySir James Spence Institute ‐ Royal Victoria InfirmaryQueen Victoria RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE1 4LP
| | - Juliet Goldbart
- Manchester Metropolitan UniversityDepartment of Psychology and Speech PathologyElizabeth Gaskell SiteHathersage RoadManchesterUKM13 0JA
| | - Julie Marshall
- Manchester Metropolitan UniversityProfessional Registration DeptElizabeth Gaskell SiteHathersage RoadManchesterUKM13 0JA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mirenda P. Toward Functional Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Students With Autism. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2003; 34:203-216. [DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461(2003/017)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2002] [Accepted: 03/24/2003] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Many individuals with autism are candidates for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, either to supplement (i.e., augment) their existing speech or to act as their primary (i.e., alternative) method of expressive communication. The purpose of this article is to summarize research and directions for future research with regard to two questions related to the delivery of AAC supports to these individuals: (a) What AAC modality is preferable to use? and (b) What do we know about the use of voice output communication aids with people with autism?
Collapse
|
20
|
Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Basili G. Use of microswitches and speech output systems with people with severe/profound intellectual or multiple disabilities: a literature review. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2001; 22:21-40. [PMID: 11263629 DOI: 10.1016/s0891-4222(00)00064-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Microswitches and speech output systems are two forms of technology which have been used with people with severe/profound intellectual or multiple disabilities to help them reduce their isolation and interact with the surrounding world (i.e., thus obtaining environmental stimulation independently or requesting it efficiently). This paper reviews the studies which used microswitches and speech output systems with the aforementioned people during the 1986-1999 period, and discusses the research findings and the practicality of these two forms of technology. Some relevant issues for future research are also pointed out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G E Lancioni
- University of Leiden, Department of Psychology, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grove N, Dockrell J. Multisign combinations by children with intellectual impairments: an analysis of language skills. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2000; 43:309-323. [PMID: 10757686 DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4302.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Research suggests that people with intellectual impairments who use manual signs to augment or substitute for speech rarely progress beyond the stage of single signs and that word order is particularly problematic. However, the majority of studies have focused on experimental tasks, and relatively little is known about spontaneous sign production in naturalistic settings. The present study explored the linguistic development in sign and speech of 10 children who relied on manual signs (the Makaton vocabulary) as their main means of communication. Mean utterance length in sign ranged from 1.0 to 2.5, and analysis of semantic relations, lexical development, and word order suggested that the children had not developed their language beyond MLU Stage I. Examination of their abilities within the modality of sign indicated that some children were able to manipulate features of sign at a sublexical level. The results are discussed in relation to the language input by teachers, and inferences are drawn regarding the underlying modality of linguistic representation in children who use manual signs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Grove
- Department of Language & Communication Science, City University, Northampton Square, London.
| | | |
Collapse
|