Fitting the right non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant to the right patient with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: an evidence-based choice

Oral anticoagulant timing and hospitalization in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients

Background

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) significantly increases ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (SE) risks. Despite the proven efficacy of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in reducing these risks, their underutilization highlights a gap in clinical practice. This study examined OAC utilization patterns within the first year after NVAF diagnosis in patients without prior OAC use and the association between the timing of OAC initiation and the risk of all-cause and stroke/SE-specific hospitalizations.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Premier Healthcare Database and linked claims from 1/1/2017-3/31/2021. Patients newly diagnosed with NVAF, without prior OAC use, were included.

Results

Of 23,148 adults with newly diagnosed NVAF, 11,059 (47.8%) initiated OAC within one year. OAC users predominantly had cardiovascular disease and risk factors, whereas non-OAC users had higher rates of malignancy and dementia. Early OAC initiation (74.9% during the index visit) was linked to lower hospitalization risks compared to those initiating later (29.2% vs. 45.9% for all-cause, p-value < 0.001 and 1.3% vs. 2.6% for stroke/SE-specific, p-value < 0.001). Adjusted odds ratios for all-cause and stroke/SE hospitalization favored early initiation were 0.35 (95% CI: 0.32-0.39) and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.24-0.47), respectively.

Conclusions

This study highlights OAC underutilization in NVAF patients and suggests early initiation may lower hospitalization rates. The findings emphasize the need for further research into real-world compliance with OAC guidelines and call for further research to confirm the benefits of early initiation. Personalized management strategies that consider individual patient profiles are recommended.

Prevention and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation via Risk Factor Modification

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant arrhythmia, and it increases stroke risk. A preventive approach to AF is needed because virtually all treatments such as cardioversion, antiarrhythmic drugs, ablation, and anticoagulation are associated with high cost and carry significant risk. A systematic review was performed to identify effective lifestyle-based strategies for reducing primary and secondary AF. A PubMed search was performed using articles up to March 1, 2021. Search terms included atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, exercise, diet, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, stress, tobacco smoking, alcohol, Mediterranean diet, sodium, and omega-3 fatty acids. Additional articles were identified from the bibliographies of retrieved articles. The control of hypertension, ideally with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, is effective for preventing primary AF and recurrence. Obstructive sleep apnea is a common cause of AF, and treating it effectively reduces AF episodes. Alcohol increases the risk of AF in a dose-dependent manner, and abstinence reduces risk of recurrence. Sedentary behavior and chronic high-intensity endurance exercise are both risk factors for AF; however, moderate physical activity is associated with lower risk of AF. Recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists have been associated with reduced risk of AF. Among overweight/obese patients, weight loss of ≥10% is associated with reduced AF risk. Lifestyle changes and risk factor modification are highly effective for preventing AF.

Significance of serum fibroblast growth factor-23 and miR-208b in pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation and their relationship with prognosis

BACKGROUND

The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation are increasing each year, and this condition is one of the most common clinical arrhythmias.

AIM

To investigate the levels and significance of serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) and miR-208b in patients with atrial fibrillation and their relationship with prognosis.

METHODS

From May 2018 to October 2019, 240 patients with atrial fibrillation were selected as an observation group, including 134 with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 106 with persistent atrial fibrillation; 150 patients with healthy sinus rhythm were selected as a control group. The serum levels of FGF-23 and miR-208b in the two groups were measured. In the observation group, cardiac parameters were determined by echocardiography.

RESULTS

The serum levels of FGF-23 and miR-208b in the observation group were 210.20 ± 89.60 ng/mL and 5.30 ± 1.22 ng/mL, which were significantly higher than the corresponding values in the control group (P < 0.05). In the observation group, the serum levels of FGF-23 and miR-208b in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation were 234.22 ± 70.05 ng/mL and 5.83 ± 1.00 ng/mL, which were significantly higher than the corresponding values in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (P < 0.05). The left atrial dimension (LAD) of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation was 38.81 ± 5.11 mm, which was significantly higher than that of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (P > 0.05). The serum levels of FGF-23 and miR-208b were positively correlated with the LAD (r = 0.411 and 0.382, P < 0.05). In the observation group, the serum levels of FGF-23 and miR-208b in patients with a major cardiovascular event (MACE) were 243.30 ± 72.29 ng/mL and 6.12 ± 1.12 ng/mL, which were significantly higher than the corresponding values in patients without a MACE (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The serum levels of FGF-23 and miR-208b are increased in patients with atrial fibrillation and are related to the type of disease, cardiac parameters, and prognosis.

Association of different oral anticoagulants use with renal function worsening in patients with atrial fibrillation: A multicentre cohort study

AIMS

To investigate the decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs).

METHODS

Multicentre prospective cohort study including 1667 patients with nonvalvular AF. The eGFR was assessed by the CKD-EPI formula at baseline and during follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study was the median annual decline of eGFR according to VKA (n = 743) or NOAC (n = 924) use. As secondary endpoints, we analysed the transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m² and the eGFR class worsening.

RESULTS

Median age was 73.7 ± 9.1 years and 43.3% were women. VKA-treated patients showed an eGFR decline of -2.11 (interquartile range [IQR] -5.68/-0.62), which was -0.27 (IQR -9.00/4.54, P < 0.001 vs VKAs), -1.21 (IQR -9.98/4.02, P = 0.004 vs VKAs) and -1.32 (IQR -8.70/3.99, P = 0.003 vs VKAs) in patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m² was lower in dabigatran- and apixaban-treated patients: odds ratio (OR) 0.492, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.298-0.813, P = 0.006 and OR 0.449, 95% CI 0.276-0.728, P = 0.001, respectively. A lower rate of eGFR class worsening was found in all groups of NOACs compared to VKAs. No difference between full and reduced dose of NOAC was found. Subgroup analysis showed that the association between NOAC and eGFR changes was markedly reduced in diabetic patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients prescribed NOACs showed a lower decline of renal function compared to those prescribed VKAs. This effect was partially lost in patients with diabetes.

Tailored Practical Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Risk Factor-Based Approach

The management of antithrombotic therapy for thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been recently evolved by the progressive replacement of vitamin K antagonists with the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). However, while these drugs are effective in reducing ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, a still high rate of cardiovascular events is present in the AF population. A tailored integrated approach to patients with AF is therefore necessary to reduce both thromboembolic events and cardiovascular disease. This approach should consist in the assessment of individual risk factors for ischemic and bleeding events in order to choose the most appropriate anticoagulant treatment according to patient's characteristics and preference. To this purpose, several risk scores have been developed and validated to stratify thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk. This review provides an individual-based strategy for the management of patients with AF, from a risk-factor based approach to a tailored prescription and monitoring of NOACs. In particular, we reported an updated practical management strategy for AF patients in specific clinical situations such as those (1) experiencing a major bleeding, (2) requiring a switch to another antithrombotic regimen, (3) restarting anticoagulation after acute ischemic stroke, (4) suffering from an acute coronary artery disease (acute coronary syndrome or undergoing cardiac revascularization).

Left atrial thrombus resolution in non-valvular atrial fibrillation or flutter: biomarker substudy results from a prospective study with rivaroxaban (X-TRA)

BACKGROUND

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants including rivaroxaban are widely used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated the relationship between plasma biomarkers (indicative of thrombogenesis, fibrinolysis and inflammation) and left atrial thrombus resolution after rivaroxaban treatment.

METHODS

This was an ancillary analysis of the X-TRA study, which was a prospective interventional study evaluating the use of rivaroxaban for left atrial/left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombus resolution in AF patients. We assessed various biomarkers of thrombogenesis/fibrinolysis [D-dimer, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1,2), thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes, von Willebrand factor (vWF)] and inflammation [high-sensitivity interleukin-6 (hsIL-6), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)], measured at baseline and after 6 weeks' of rivaroxaban treatment.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in the mean levels of hsCRP, D-dimer, vWF, and TAT from baseline to end of treatment with rivaroxaban. Although none of the thrombogenesis/fibrinolysis biomarkers showed a significant relationship with thrombus resolution, high inflammatory biomarkers at baseline were significantly associated with an increased chance of the thrombus being completely resolved (hsIL-6) or reduced/resolved (hsCRP).

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarkers of inflammation are significantly associated with LA/LAA thrombus outcomes in AF patients prospectively treated with rivaroxaban.

One-year risks of stroke and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation from different clinical settings: The Gulf SAFE registry and Darlington AF registry

BACKGROUND

Differences exist in oral anticoagulation (OAC) use between different populations with atrial fibrillation (AF), which may be associated with varying outcomes.

PURPOSE

We aimed to provide patient level comparisons of two cohorts of patients with AF, from the United Kingdom (UK) and Middle East (ME).

METHODS

The clinical characteristics, prescription of OAC, one-year risk of stroke and mortality were compared between individual patients with AF included into the Darlington AF registry (UK, n = 2258) and the Gulf SAFE (Survey of atrial fibrillation events) registry (ME, n = 1740).

RESULTS

A high percentage of patients from the Darlington registry were candidates for OAC (i.e., CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2 in males or ≥3 in females; 82.0% in Darlington and 57.1% in Gulf SAFE). OAC use was suboptimal (52.0% in Darlington vs 58.4% in Gulf SAFE). One-year rates of stroke and mortality were high in both populations, especially in those with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2 in males and ≥3 in females (Darlington vs. Gulf SAFE: 3.51% vs. 5.63 for stroke; 11.4% vs. 16.8% for mortality). On multivariate analyses, female sex and previous stroke were independently associated with stroke events; while elderly age, female sex, vascular disease and heart failure were independent risk factors for mortality (all p < 0.05). Patients from Gulf SAFE registry had higher risk of stroke (odds ratio, 2.18 [1.47-3.23]) and mortality (odds ratio, 1.67 [1.31-2.14]) compared with those from Darlington registry. The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score showed good discrimination in predicting one-year risk of stroke (area under curve, 0.71 [0.65-0.76] in non-anticoagulated patients) and mortality (area under curve, 0.70 [0.68-0.72]) in the whole study population, as well as in Darlington or Gulf SAFE registry separately.

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke prevention was generally suboptimal in patient cohorts from the two registries, which was associated with high one-year risks of stroke and mortality, particularly so among patients from the Gulf SAFE registry. The higher risks for stroke and mortality in AF patients from the Gulf SAFE registry (compared to a UK cohort) merit further implementation of cardiovascular prevention strategies.

Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Focus on Asian Patients

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia conferring a fivefold increased risk of stroke. Stroke prevention is the cornerstone of management of patients with AF. Asians have a generally higher incidence of AF-related risks of stroke and bleeding (particularly intracranial bleeding), compared with non-Asians. Despite the well-documented efficacy and relative safety of oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention among Asians, the suboptimal use of oral anticoagulation remains common. The current narrative review aims to provide a summary of the available evidence on stroke prevention among patients with AF focused on the Asia region, regarding stroke and bleeding risk evaluation, the performance of oral anticoagulation, and current use of thromboprophylaxis.