Effects on plasma noradrenaline may explain some of the improved insulin sensitivity seen by AT‐1 receptor blockade

Bioactive Signaling in Next-Generation Pharmacotherapies for Heart Failure: A Review

Importance

The standard pharmacotherapy for heart failure (HF), particularly HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), is primarily through the use of receptor antagonists, notably inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system by either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition or angiotensin II receptor blockade (ARB). However, the completed Prospective Comparison of ARNI With an ACE-Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial identified that the use of a single molecule (sacubitril/valsartan), which is an ARB and the neutral endopeptidase inhibitor (NEPi) neprilysin, yielded improved clinical outcomes in HFrEF compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition alone.

Observations

This review examined specific bioactive signaling pathways that would be potentiated by NEPi and how these would affect key cardiovascular processes relevant to HFrEF. It also addressed potential additive/synergistic effects of ARB. A number of biological signaling pathways that may be potentiated by sacubitril/valsartan were identified, including some novel candidate molecules, which will act in a synergistic manner to favorably alter the natural history of HFrEF.

Conclusions and Relevance

This review identified that activation rather than inhibition of specific receptor pathways provided favorable cardiovascular effects that cannot be achieved by renin-angiotensin system inhibition alone. Thus, an entirely new avenue of translational and clinical research lies ahead in which HF pharmacotherapies will move beyond receptor antagonist strategies.

Acute angiotensin II receptor blockade improves insulin-induced microvascular function in hypertensive individuals

OBJECTIVE

An effect of insulin that is crucial for stimulating glucose uptake is its ability to increase the number of perfused capillaries, and thereby enhance its own delivery, and that of glucose, to muscle cells. To unravel possible mechanisms involved in the insulin-sensitizing effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in hypertensive individuals we investigated the effect of single-dose ARB administration on insulin-mediated microvascular perfusion in hypertensive individuals.

METHODS

We examined the effects of ARB administration on hyperinsulinemia-associated capillary density by measuring baseline skin capillary density, capillary density during reactive hyperemia (hyperemic capillary recruitment), and capillary density during venous congestion in 17 hypertensive individuals in the basal state, during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, and during a hyperinsulinemic clamp with acute ARB administration (600 mg irbesartan), acute calcium channel blockade (CCB; 10mg felodipine ER), as a control for the reduction in blood pressure, or placebo. In addition, insulin sensitivity and blood pressure were measured.

RESULTS

Compared to the basal state, hyperinsulinemia increased baseline capillary density (57.3 ± 6.8 vs. 60.3 ± 7.9 n/mm(2), P<0.01), but not hyperemic capillary recruitment. ARB and CCB treatment induced similar blood pressure reductions. Compared to placebo, ARB, but not CCB, increased hyperinsulinemia-associated baseline capillary density (+2.3 ± 3.4 (P=0.02) and -0.4 ± 4.4n/mm(2), respectively). Hyperinsulinemia-associated hyperemic capillary recruitment was not altered by either treatment. Compared to placebo, neither ARB nor CCB treatment enhanced insulin sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute ARB administration increases insulin-induced microvascular perfusion in mildly hypertensive individuals; this beneficial effect on microvascular perfusion was however not associated with increased insulin-mediated glucose uptake.