The impact of switching to mTOR inhibitor-based immunosuppression on long-term non-melanoma skin cancer incidence and renal function in kidney and liver transplant recipients

Management of Cutaneous Head and Neck Squamous and Basal Cell Carcinomas for Immunocompromised Patients

The incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) continues to rise, and more than one million cases are diagnosed in the United States each year. The increase in prevalence has been attributed to increased lifespan and improvements in survival for conditions that increase the risk of these malignancies. Patients who are immunocompromised have a higher risk of developing NMSC compared to the general population. In immunosuppressed patients, a combination of prevention, frequent surveillance, and early intervention are necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality. In this review, we collate and summarize current knowledge regarding pathogenesis of head and neck cutaneous SCC and BCC within immunocompromised patients, examine the potential role of the immune response in disease progression, and detail the role of novel immunotherapies in this subset of patients.

Association of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers, Melanoma, and Merkel Cell Carcinoma with Dermatologic Medications: A Case-Control Pharmacovigilance Study of the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Medications used in the treatment of dermatologic conditions have been associated with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), basal cell carcinoma (BCC), melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to examine the relationship between systemic dermatologic medications and skin cancer in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

Case-control analyses were performed in FAERS from 1968 to 2021 to examine the reporting odds ratios (RORs) for SCC, BCC, melanoma, and MCC.

RESULTS

The oral immunosuppressants were all associated with increased ROR of SCC, BCC, melanoma, and MCC. Azathioprine had the highest ROR for SCC (34.13, 95% CI 29.07-40.08), BCC (21.15, 95% CI 20.63-25.98), and MCC (44.76, 95% CI 31.52-63.55), while quinacrine and guselkumab had the highest ROR for melanoma (13.14, 95% CI 1.84-93.89 vs. 12.73, 95% CI 10.60-15.30, respectively). The TNF-α inhibitors were associated with an increased ROR for all skin cancers investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

The oral immunosuppressants and many biologic medications were associated with an increased ROR of skin cancers including TNF-α inhibitors (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab), IL-23 or IL-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab, risankizumab), and the CD-20 inhibitor rituximab but not dupilumab or IL-17 inhibitors.

De novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation: a single-center experience in China

BACKGROUND

Long-term prognosis and risk factors of de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation were rarely studied. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features, risk factors, and long-term prognosis of de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation, especially the impact of aristolochic acid on tumor, using a large sample.

METHODS

106 patients were enrolled in retrospective study. The endpoints included overall survival, cancer-specific survival, bladder or contralateral upper tract recurrence-free survival. Patients were grouped according to aristolochic acid exposure. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curve. Log-rank test was used to compare the difference. Multivariable cox regression was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance.

RESULTS

Median time from transplantation to development of upper tract urothelial carcinoma was 91.5 months. Cancer-specific survival rate at 1, 5, 10 years was 89.2%, 73.2%, 61.6%. Tumor staging (≥ T2), lymph node status (N +) were independent risk factors for cancer-specific death. Contralateral upper tract recurrence-free survival rate at 1, 3, 5 years was 80.4%, 68.5%, 50.9%. Aristolochic acid exposure was independent risk factor for contralateral upper tract recurrence. The patients exposed to aristolochic acid had more multifocal tumors and higher incidence of contralateral upper tract recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Both higher tumor staging and positive lymph node status were associated with a worse cancer-specific survival in patients with post-transplant de novo upper tract urothelial carcinoma, which highlighted the importance of early diagnosis. Aristolochic acid was associated with multifocality of tumors and higher incidence of contralateral upper tract recurrence. Thus, prophylactic contralateral resection was suggested for post-transplant upper tract urothelial carcinoma, especially for patients with aristolochic acid exposure.

Solid Organ Transplantation Is Associated with an Increased Rate of Mismatch Repair Deficiency and PIK3CA Mutations in Colorectal Cancer

Solid organ transplants are associated with a modestly increased risk of colorectal cancers (CRC). However, the molecular profile of these cancers has not been described. We hypothesized that transplant-related immunosuppression may promote development of more immunogenic tumors as suggested by a high tumor mutation burden or mismatch repair deficiency. We performed an electronic medical record search for patients seen in the Johns Hopkins University Health System (JHHS) between 2017 and 2022 who developed CRC following solid organ transplantation. A comparator cohort of patients treated for CRC at JHHS with molecular profiling data was also identified. In this case, 29 patients were identified that developed post-transplant CRC (renal transplant, n = 18; liver transplant, n = 8; kidney-liver transplantation, n = 3). Compared to the JHHS general population CRC cohort, patients who developed post-transplant CRC had a higher rate of mismatch repair deficiency (41% versus 12%, p-value = 0.0038), and elevated tumor mutation burden (median of 22 mut/Mb versus 3.5 mut/Mb, p-value = 0.033) (range 3.52-53.65). Post-transplant tumors were enriched for PIK3CA mutations (43% versus 24%, p-value = 0.042). Post-Transplant CRCs are associated with clinical and molecular features of immune sensitivity, supporting a potential role for impaired immune surveillance in shaping the landscape of CRCs. These results may help inform the management of patients with post-transplant CRC.

Skin Cancer in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Review for the Nondermatologist

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at increased risk for the development of skin cancer compared with the general population, which requires consistent monitoring and management from a multidisciplinary team. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview for nondermatologist clinicians, outlining skin cancer diagnosis, treatment pearls, and skin cancer prevention strategies as they relate to SOTRs. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted through the MEDLINE database with search terms including organ transplantation, transplant recipient, skin cancer, cutaneous neoplasms, management, and therapies. The search was limited to the English language and dates ranging from January 1, 2011, to December 28, 2021. All studies were reviewed for inclusion. Skin cancer will develop in more than half of SOTRs at some point in their life, most often nonmelanoma skin cancer such as basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Melanoma and rarer cutaneous malignant neoplasms, such as Merkel cell carcinoma and Kaposi sarcoma, are also more frequent among SOTRs. A multidisciplinary effort at skin cancer screening and patient education is invaluable to prevent skin cancer-related morbidity and mortality in this population of patients. Reduction in immunosuppressive medications and surgical intervention are effective therapeutic approaches, and more novel systemic therapies including G protein-coupled receptor inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors are possible options when traditional treatment approaches are not feasible. Checkpoint inhibitor therapy, however, comes with the risk of allograft rejection. With a growing and aging SOTR population, it is essential that SOTRs have support from dermatologists and nondermatologists alike in skin cancer prevention and treatment.

De Novo Skin Neoplasms in Liver-Transplanted Patients: Single-Center Prospective Evaluation of 105 Cases

Background and Objectives: Solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are notably considered at risk for developing cutaneous malignancies. However, most of the existing literature is focused on kidney transplant-related non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). Conflicting data have been published so far on NMSC incidence among liver transplant recipients (LTRs), and whether LTRs really should be considered at lower risk remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to prospectively collect data on the incidence of cutaneous neoplasms in an LTR cohort. Materials and Methods: All LTRs transplanted at the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit of Modena University Hospital from October 2015 to June 2021 underwent a post-transplant periodic skin check at the Dermatology Unit according to our institutional integrated care pathway. Data on the presence of cutaneous malignant and premalignant lesions were collected at every timepoint. Results: A total of 105 patients were enrolled in the present study. Nearly 15% of the patients developed cutaneous cancerous and/or precancerous lesions during the follow-up period. Almost half of the skin cancerous lesions were basal cell carcinomas. Actinic keratoses (AKs) were observed in six patients. Four patients developed in situ squamous cell carcinomas, and one patient was diagnosed with stage I malignant melanoma. Otherwise, well-established risk factors for the occurrence of skin tumors, such as skin phototype, cumulative sun exposure, and familial history of cutaneous neoplasms, seemed to have no direct impact on skin cancer occurrence in our cohort, as well as an immunosuppressive regimen and the occurrence of non-cutaneous neoplasms. Conclusions: Close dermatological follow-up is crucial for LTRs, and shared protocols of regular skin checks in this particular subset of patients are needed in transplant centers.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the prevention of kidney transplant rejection: the evidence to date

INTRODUCTION

Although early rejection episodes are successfully controlled, the problem of unrecognized production of de novo anti HLA antibodies and associated chronic rejection still persists.

AREAS COVERED

In addition to the standard induction and maintenance therapy, we present a couple of new drugs as induction (Alemtuzumab), CNI free protocol (Belatacept, Sirolimus, Everolimus), maintenance treatment in transplant patients with various type of malignancies (T cell targeted immunomodulators blocking the immune checkpoints CTLA-4, PD1/PDL1) and TMA (aHUS) -eculizimab, and IL6 receptor antagonists in antibody mediated rejection (AMR).

EXPERT OPINION

There are couple of issues still preventing improvement in kidney transplant long-term outcomes with current and anticipated future immunosuppression: patient more susceptible to infection and CNI nephrotoxicity in kidneys obtained from elderly donors, highly sensitized patients with limited chances to get appropriate kidney and a higher risk for late AMR. A lower rate of CMV/BK virus infections has been observed in everolimus treated patients. Belatacept use has been justified only in EBV seropositive kidney transplants due to the increased risk of PTLD. Eculizumab upon recurrence of aHUS is a sole cost-effective option. A new IL-6 blocking drug (clazakizumab/tocilizumab) is promising option for prevention/treatment of AMR. Clinical experience in tailoring immunosuppression for as long as possible graft and patient survival is inevitable.

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors for prolonged secondary prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive agents are essential for graft survival in solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), but they have substantial durable side effects, including a higher incidence of aggressive non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). Hitherto, only one class of immunosuppressants, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi), may inhibit skin tumor formation, however their durable effectiveness is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sustained effectiveness of mTORi in reducing NMSCs' incidence in SOTRs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in a specialized dermatology clinic for SOTRs of a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. SOTRs with a history of at least one histologically proven NMSC, were followed for 6 years: 3 years after transplantation, before initiation of mTORi, and 3 years under mTORi treatment.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 44 SOTRs. Treatment with mTORi was initiated on average 6.27 (3.34-6.34) years following transplantation. In the 3 years before mTORi treatment initiation, the mean number of new NMSCs per patient was 2.11 (1-14). This value decreased to 1.2 (0-19) in the 3 years under mTORi treatment (P=0.0007). Analysis by NMSC type yielded a significant decrease in both SCCs and BCCs.

CONCLUSION

This study found that mTORi are effective for prolonged secondary prevention of NMSCs in SOTRs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Review of Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR) of non-lymphoid de novo malignancies after liver transplantation: Structured analysis of global differences

INTRODUCTION

De Novo malignancy after liver transplantation (LTx) is the second most common cause of death in adult LTx recipients. The current report identifies differences in Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR) for various non-lymphoid de novo malignancies by comparing and analyzing post LTx SIR for non-lymphoid de novo malignancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A thorough search of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted; 25 publications describing de novo malignancies post-LTx with SIR were identified.

RESULTS

Overall SIR varied from 1.4 to 11.6 (median 2.4). Oropharyngeal/larynx (OPL), lung, colo-rectal, and kidney malignancies were more prevalent with higher SIR (median = 4.4, 1.9, 2.67, 2.5, respectively). Breast and prostate malignancies were also more prevalent with lower SIR (median = 0.9, 1.0, respectively). Pancreatic, central nervous system (CNS), melanoma, rare cancers and Kaposi's sarcoma were less prevalent (except in Italy and Sweden) but had much higher SIR (median = 2.6, 2.4, 2.02, 22.5 and 53.6, respectively). The overall higher SIR values are related to the age of the recipient, length of follow-up, the grouping of different organ systems, inclusion or exclusion of epidermal non-malacotic skin cancers, lymphoid malignancy, and occurrence of rare malignancies including Kaposi's sarcoma.

CONCLUSION

OPL, lung, gastrointestinal, kidney, and bladder malignancies were more prevalent with higher SIR. Breast and prostate cancers were more prevalent with lower SIR. Pancreatic, CNS, melanoma, rare cancers and Kaposi's sarcoma were less prevalent with higher SIR. Age of the recipients, length of follow-up, and rare cancer types influence overall SIR values with some global differences.

Oh, the Mutations You'll Acquire! A Systematic Overview of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Nearly two million cases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) are diagnosed every year in the United States alone. cSCC is notable for both its prevalence and its propensity for invasion and metastasis. For many patients, surgery is curative. However, patients experiencing immunosuppression or recurrent, advanced, and metastatic disease still face limited therapeutic options and significant mortality. cSCC forms after decades of sun exposure and possesses the highest known mutation rate of all cancers. This mutational burden complicates efforts to identify the primary factors driving cSCC initiation and progression, which in turn hinders the development of targeted therapeutics. In this review, we summarize the mutations and alterations that have been observed in patients’ cSCC tumors, affecting signaling pathways, transcriptional regulators, and the microenvironment. We also highlight novel therapeutic opportunities in development and clinical trials.

Association of HLA mismatch and MTOR inhibitor regimens with malignancy and mortality after kidney transplantation

Background The association of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (MTORI) with malignancies and mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with different degrees of human leukocyte antigen mismatch (HLA-mm) at transplant has not been previously studied. Methods Our observational cohort study included 166, 256 adult KTRs in 2000-2018. Immunosuppression in the first post-transplant year were MTORIs in 13,056 (7.85%) and non-MTORIs in 153,200 (92.15%). We used Cox multivariable regression models to determine the cause-specific hazard ratio (HRcs) of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC),solid organ malignancies (SOM)] and all-cause death (death_ac); and the HR of the composite outcomes of NMSC or death_ac and SOM or death_ac associated with MTORI versus non-MTORI regimens in the overall study sample and the 0, 1-3, and 4-6 HLA-A, B and DR mm subgroups. Results NMSC risk was lower with MTORI than non-MTORI in all HLA-mm subgroups [(0 mm, HRcs = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.46-0.97, 1-3 mm, HRcs = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.61-0.87, 4-6 mm, HRcs = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.62-0.76)]. SOM risks were similar between regimens in the 0 HLA mm subgroup (HRcs = 1.10 (95% CI = 0.78-1.57) and lower with MTORI than non-MTORI in the 1-3, and 4-6 HLA-mm subgroups, [(HR = 0.84; (95% CI = 0.71-0.99), and (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.78-0.94); respectively]. Risks of death_ac and composite outcomes (NMSC or death_ac and SOM or death_ac) were higher with MTORI than non-MTORI in almost all HLA-mm subgroups. Conclusion MTORIs are associated with protection from NMSC and SOM in almost all HLA-mm subgroups ca; however, their association with increased all-cause mortality in adult kidney transplant recipients needs further investigation.