Race/ethnicity is an independent risk factor for autoimmune hepatitis among the San Francisco underserved

Donor-recipient race-ethnicity concordance and patient survival after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the association between patient survival after liver transplantation (LT) and donor-recipient race-ethnicity (R/E) concordance.

METHODS

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) was retrospectively analyzed using data collected between 2002 and 2019. Only adults without history of prior organ transplant and recipients of LT alone were included. The primary outcome was patient survival. Donors and recipients were categorized into five R/E groups: White/Caucasian, African American/Black, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, and Others. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox Proportional Hazards models, adjusting for donor and recipient covariates.

RESULTS

85,427 patients were included. Among all the R/E groups, Asian patients had the highest 5-year survival (81.3%; 95% CI = 79.9-82.7), while African American/Black patients had the lowest (71.4%; 95% CI = 70.3-72.6) (P < 0.001). Lower survival rates were observed in recipients who received discordant R/E grafts irrespective of their R/E group. The fully adjusted hazard ratio for death was statistically significant in African American/Black (aHR 1.07-1.18-1.31; P < 0.01) and in White∕Caucasian patients (aHR 1.00-1.04-1.07; P = 0.03) in the presence of donor-recipient R/E discordance.

CONCLUSION

Disparities in post-LT outcomes might be influenced by biological factors in addition to well-known social determinants of health.

Novel autoantibody targets identified in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) by PhIP-Seq reveals pathogenic insights

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a severe autoimmune disease, characterized by the presence of autoantibodies. However, the role of autoantibodies in the pathophysiology of AIH remains uncertain. Here, we employed Phage Immunoprecipitation-Sequencing (PhIP-Seq) to identify novel autoantibodies in AIH. Using these results, a logistic regression classifier was able to predict which patients had AIH, indicating the presence of a distinct humoral immune signature. To further investigate the autoantibodies most specific to AIH, significant peptides were identified relative to a broad array of controls (298 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), or healthy controls). Top ranked autoreactive targets included SLA, the target of a well-recognized autoantibody in AIH, and disco interacting protein 2 homolog A (DIP2A). The autoreactive fragment of DIP2A shares a 9-amino acid stretch nearly identical to the U27 protein of HHV-6B, a virus found in the liver. In addition, antibodies against peptides derived from the leucine rich repeat N-terminal (LRRNT) domain of the relaxin family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1) were highly enriched and specific to AIH. The enriched peptides map to a motif adjacent to the receptor binding domain, which is required for RXFP1 signaling. RXFP1 is a G protein-coupled receptor that binds relaxin-2, an anti-fibrogenic molecule shown to reduce the myofibroblastic phenotype of hepatic stellate cells. Eight of nine patients with antibodies to RXFP1 had evidence of advanced fibrosis (F3 or greater). Furthermore, serum from AIH patients positive for anti-RFXP1 antibody was able to significantly inhibit relaxin-2 signaling in the human monocytic cell line, THP1. Depletion of IgG from anti-RXFP1 positive serum abrogated this effect. These data provide supporting evidence that HHV6 plays a role in the development of AIH and point to a potential pathogenic role for anti-RXFP1 IgG in some patients. Identification of anti-RXFP1 in patient serum may enable risk stratification of AIH patients for fibrosis progression and lead to the development of novel strategies for disease intervention.

Health disparities in chronic liver disease

The syndemic of hazardous alcohol consumption, opioid use, and obesity has led to important changes in liver disease epidemiology that have exacerbated health disparities. Health disparities occur when plausibly avoidable health differences are experienced by socially disadvantaged populations. Highlighting health disparities, their sources, and consequences in chronic liver disease is fundamental to improving liver health outcomes. There have been large increases in alcohol use disorder in women, racial and ethnic minorities, and those experiencing poverty in the context of poor access to alcohol treatment, leading to increasing rates of alcohol-associated liver diseases. Rising rates of NAFLD and associated fibrosis have been observed in Hispanic persons, women aged > 50, and individuals experiencing food insecurity. Access to viral hepatitis screening and linkage to treatment are suboptimal for racial and ethnic minorities and individuals who are uninsured or underinsured, resulting in greater liver-related mortality and later-stage diagnoses of HCC. Data from more diverse cohorts on autoimmune and cholestatic liver diseases are lacking, supporting the need to study the contemporary epidemiology of these disorders in greater detail. Herein, we review the existing literature on racial and ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic disparities in chronic liver diseases using a social determinants of health framework to better understand how social and structural factors cause health disparities and affect chronic liver disease outcomes. We also propose potential solutions to eliminate disparities, outlining health-policy, health-system, community, and individual solutions to promote equity and improve health outcomes.

Sociodemographic and geographic differences in the US epidemiology of autoimmune hepatitis with and without cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Data on the epidemiology of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in the United States are limited. This study investigated the sociodemographic and geographic factors associated with AIH incidence and prevalence with and without cirrhosis.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

In a retrospective cohort of adults in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (2009-2018), we identified AIH cases using a validated claims-based algorithm. Incidence and prevalence were compared between sociodemographic subgroups. Logistic regression evaluated the association of US Census Division with AIH incidence and the factors associated with incident AIH with cirrhosis. From 2009 to 2018, the age- and sex-standardized prevalence of AIH in the Optum cohort was 26.6 per 100,000 persons with an incidence of 4.0 per 100,000 person-years. AIH incidence increased earlier among Hispanics (age 50-59 years) and later among Asians (≥80 years). Adjusted AIH incidence was higher in the Mountain Division (odds ratio [OR] 1.17) and lower in the Pacific (OR 0.68), Middle Atlantic (OR 0.81), and West North Central Divisions (OR 0.86 vs. East North Central; p < 0.001). Male sex (OR 1.31, p = 0.003), Black race (OR 1.32, p = 0.022), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.37 vs. non-Hispanic White, p = 0.009) were associated with incident AIH with cirrhosis. Incident AIH with cirrhosis was greater in the West South Central Division (OR 1.30 vs. South Atlantic; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

AIH epidemiology differs according to sociodemographic and geographic factors in the United States. Studies are needed to determine the genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors underlying the heterogeneity in AIH risk and outcomes.

Applying an equity lens to liver health and research in Europe

Liver disease is a major cause of premature death and disability in Europe. However, morbidity and mortality are not equally distributed in the population. In spite of this, there are few studies addressing the issue of health inequalities in Europe. In this Public Health Corner article, we compare the research conducted on health inequalities in Europe to other settings and highlight the main differences based upon an extensive review of the literature. We report that only 10.2% of studies were led by European institutions or conducted in European populations and that certain topics such as alcohol-related liver disease are largely overlooked. In addition, we discuss the relevance of including a health equity lens when conducting clinical, epidemiological and health systems' research in liver disease and set out the basic requirements to tackle health inequalities in liver disease in Europe.

Current status of disparity in liver disease

Disparities have emerged as an important issue in many aspects of healthcare in developed countries and may be based on race, ethnicity, sex, geographical location, and socioeconomic status. For liver disease specifically, these potential disparities can affect access to care and outcome in viral hepatitis, chronic liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Shortages in hepatologists and medical providers versed in liver disease may amplify these disparities by compromising early detection of liver disease, surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma, and prompt referral to subspecialists and transplant centers. In the United States, continued efforts have been made to address some of these disparities with better education of healthcare providers, use of telehealth to enhance access to specialists, reminders in electronic medical records, and modifying organ allocation systems for liver transplantation. This review will detail the current status of disparities in liver disease and describe current efforts to minimize these disparities.

Evaluation of the Prevalence and Incidence of Pediatric Alopecia Areata Using Electronic Health Record Data

Importance

Pediatric alopecia areata (AA) prevalence and incidence data are key to understanding the natural history of this medical disease.

Objective

To determine the prevalence and incidence of AA in a pediatric population across time, age, sex, race and ethnicity, and geographic areas within the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this multicenter cohort study conducted among 5 children's hospitals, data (January 2009 to November 2020) were collected from a standardized electronic health record (PEDSnet database, version 4.0) to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of pediatric AA. The study cohort included patients younger than 18 years with at least 2 physician visits during which a diagnosis code for AA was recorded, or 1 dermatologist specialty visit for which AA was recorded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The prevalence denominator population comprised 5 409 919 patients. The incidence denominator population was 2 896 241. We identified 5801 children for inclusion in the AA cohort, and 2398 (41.3%) had 12 months or more of follow-up and were included in the incidence analysis.

Results

Of 5801 patients in the AA cohort, the mean (SD) age was 9.0 (4.5) years, 3259 (56.2%) were female, 359 (6.2) were Asian, 1094 (18.9%) were Black, 1348 (23.2%) were Hispanic, and 2362 (40.7%) were White. The overall prevalence of pediatric AA was 0.11%, and the participants in the AA cohort were more often older, female, and members of a racial and ethnic minority group than the full PEDSnet population. The 11-year overall incidence rate of pediatric AA between 2009 and 2020 was 13.6 cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 13.1-14.2). The incidence rate by age was normally distributed and peaked at age 6 years. Rates were 22.8% higher in female patients than male patients (15.1 cases per 100 000 person-years for females vs 12.3 cases per 100 000 person-years for males). Additionally, incidence rates were highest among Hispanic children (31.5 cases per 100 000 person-years).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study examined the prevalence and incidence rates of pediatric AA in the US across time, age, sex, race and ethnicity, and region from 2009 to 2020, finding a prevalence of 0.11% (doubling during the last decade) and incidence rate of 13.6 cases per 100 000 person-years. Additionally, the results identified Asian and Hispanic children as high-risk demographic subgroups who were shown to be 2 and 3 times more likely, respectively, to receive a diagnosis of AA.

Transcriptomic profiling of blood from autoimmune hepatitis patients reveals potential mechanisms with implications for management

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a poorly understood, chronic disease, for which corticosteroids are still the mainstay of therapy and most patients undergo liver biopsy to obtain a diagnosis. We aimed to determine if there was a transcriptomic signature of AIH in the peripheral blood and investigate underlying biologic pathways revealed by gene expression analysis. Whole blood RNA from 75 AIH patients and 25 healthy volunteers was extracted and sequenced. Differential gene expression analysis revealed 249 genes that were significantly differentially expressed in AIH patients compared to controls. Using a random forest algorithm, we determined that less than 10 genes were sufficient to differentiate the two groups in our cohort. Interferon signaling was more active in AIH samples compared to controls, regardless of treatment status. Pegivirus sequences were detected in five AIH samples and 1 healthy sample. The gene expression data and clinical metadata were used to determine 12 genes that were significantly associated with advanced fibrosis in AIH. AIH patients with a partial response to therapy demonstrated decreased evidence of a CD8+ T cell gene expression signal. These findings represent progress in understanding a disease in need of better tests, therapies, and biomarkers.

Outcomes of pregnancy in autoimmune hepatitis: A population-based study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) disproportionately affects young women, which may have implications in pregnancy. However, data on pregnancy outcomes in women with AIH are limited.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Using weighted discharge data from the United States National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2016, we evaluated pregnancies after 20 weeks gestation and compared outcomes in AIH to other chronic liver diseases (CLD) or no CLD in pregnancy. The association of AIH with maternal and perinatal outcomes was assessed by logistic regression. Among 18,595,345 pregnancies, 935 (<0.001%) had AIH (60 with cirrhosis) and 120,100 (0.006%) had other CLD (845 with cirrhosis). Temporal trends in pregnancies with AIH remained stable from 2008 to 2016 with 1.4-6.8/100,000 pregnancies per year (p = 0.25). On adjusted analysis, the odds of gestational diabetes (GDM) and hypertensive complications (pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, or hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) were significantly higher in AIH compared to other CLD (GDM: OR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.5-3.9, p < 0.001; hypertensive complications: OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.0-3.2, p = 0.05) and also compared to no CLD in pregnancy (GDM: OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.6-3.6, p < 0.001; hypertensive complications: OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3-4.1, p = 0.003). AIH was also associated with preterm births when compared with women without CLD (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2-3.5, p = 0.01). AIH was not associated with postpartum hemorrhage, maternal, or perinatal death.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of pregnancy in women with AIH have remained stable in recent years, although AIH is associated with notable maternal and perinatal risks, such as GDM, hypertensive complications, and preterm birth. Whether these risks are influenced by steroid use and/or AIH disease activity warrants evaluation. These data support a low risk of postpartum hemorrhage and favorable survival of mothers and infants.

Racial differences in primary sclerosing cholangitis mortality is associated with community socioeconomic status

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Natural history and outcomes data in PSC are mostly derived from cohorts where Blacks have been underrepresented. It is unknown if there are differences in mortality between Blacks and Whites with PSC.

METHODS

PSC patients seen at our institution from June 1988 to Jan 2019 were identified by merging prospective ERCP hepatology-clinic databases and liver-transplant registry. Data on race, clinical events, and death was obtained through chart review. Data on community health were collected using indices from county health rankings. Cumulative incidence of death was calculated using liver transplant (LT) as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Of 449 patients, 404 were White and 45 were Black. The median-duration of follow-up was 7 years (IQR:3, 13). Black patients were younger at presentation than White patients (36.3 vs 42.5 years., P = .013). Disease severity as indicated by Mayo Risk Score categories (low 27% vs 31%, intermediate 54% vs 49% and high 19% vs 19%, P = .690), comorbidity burden and frequency of cirrhosis (42% vs 35%, P = .411) were similar between Blacks and Whites. Cumulative incidence of liver-related death, with LT as a competing risk was significantly higher in Blacks compared to Whites (sHR 1.80, 95%CI 1.25, 2.61, P = .002). There was a significant interaction between race and community socioeconomic factors that attenuated the racial difference in mortality (sHR 1.01, 95%CI 0.99, 1.04, P = .345).

CONCLUSIONS

Blacks with PSC present at a younger age with a similar disease severity as Whites but have higher liver related mortality that is mediated in part through community health.

We Are Not Immune: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Autoimmune Liver Diseases

Autoimmune liver diseases are attributed to a complex interplay of biologic, acquired, and environmental factors. Increased prevalence, later stage at presentation, worse response to standard therapy, and transplant-related disparities have all been reported in racial and ethnic minorities such as Black and Latinx patients with autoimmune liver diseases. While biology and inherited genetic predispositions may partly explain these disparities, definitive and universal genetic variations underlying these differences in outcomes have not been defined. Nonetheless, socioeconomic status, access to health care, environmental and societal factors, and implicit provider bias can all contribute to poor patient outcomes. There remains an unmet need to understand and mitigate the factors contributing to health inequity in autoimmune liver diseases. In this review, we summarize the data on racial and ethnic disparities in presentation, treatment response, and outcomes pertaining to autoimmune liver diseases in minority populations, on the premise that understanding disparities is the first step toward reaching health equity.

Racial and ethnic disparities in treatment response and tolerability in multiple sclerosis: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Inter-individual response and tolerability profiles associated with available disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are an important aspect of the therapeutic decision-making process in multiple sclerosis (MS). In the absence of racially diverse clinical studies, the possible effect of race and ethnicity on treatment outcome remains uncertain. This study aims to compare disease outcome among Hispanic, Black, and White patients with MS, and assess the impact of race/ethnicity on long-term outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective review of electronic medical records was performed on a multiethnic cohort of MS patients treated in a large academic center. Sociodemographic characteristics, treatment regimens, and disability outcomes were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

A total of 300 age- and gender-matched MS patients (100 Hispanic, 100 Black, and 100 White) were included in the study. When assessing the overall survival of MS patients without ambulatory disability 5 years from diagnosis, Hispanics and Blacks attained lower survival times compared to Whites (survival time ratio [STR] 0.17, p = 0.004; and 0.14, p = 0.002, respectively). Black patients had the highest rate of disease progression and treatment-limiting adverse events despite similar sociodemographic profiles and DMT exposure relative to Hispanics and Whites.

CONCLUSION

Racial/ethnic disparities in treatment outcome create an unmet need to identify tailored, multifaceted approaches to therapy selection in MS.

Validating a novel algorithm to identify patients with autoimmune hepatitis in an administrative database

PURPOSE

Population-level studies on the treatment practices and comparative effectiveness of therapies in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are lacking due to the absence of validated methods to identify patients with AIH in large databases, such as administrative claims or electronic health records. This study ascertained the performance of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for AIH, and developed and validated a novel algorithm that reliably identifies patients with AIH in health administrative data and claims.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of patients with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient ICD codes for AIH between 2008 and 2019 at a single health system. In a random sample of 250 patients, definite or probable AIH was determined using the Simplified AIH score, Revised AIH score or expert adjudication. The positive predictive value (PPV) was obtained. Variations of this base algorithm were evaluated using additional criteria to increase its performance.

RESULTS

Of the 250 patients, 143 (57.2%) patients had sufficient records available for review. The PPV of the base algorithm was 77.6% (95% CI: 69.9-84.2%). Exclusion of patients with ≥1 ICD code for primary biliary cholangitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis yielded a PPV of 89.7% (95% CI: 82.8-94.6%). Further exclusion of patients with recent immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy increased the PPV to 92.9% (95% CI: 86.5-96.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ICD codes for AIH alone are insufficient to reliably identify patients with AIH in health administrative data and claims. Our proposed algorithm that includes additional diagnostic and medication-related coding criteria demonstrates excellent performance.

Ursodeoxycholic Acid Treatment Preferentially Improves Overall Survival Among African Americans With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

BACKGROUND

We used data from the Fibrotic Liver Disease Consortium to evaluate the impact of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment across race/ethnicity, gender, and clinical status among patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

METHODS

Data were collected from "index date" (baseline) through December 31, 2016. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting was used to adjust for UDCA treatment selection bias. Cox regression, focusing on UDCA-by-risk factor interactions, was used to assess the association between treatment and mortality and liver transplant/death.

RESULTS

Among 4,238 patients with primary biliary cholangitis (13% men; 8% African American, 7% Asian American/American Indian/Pacific Island [ASINPI]; 21% Hispanic), 78% had ever received UDCA. The final multivariable model for mortality retained age, household income, comorbidity score, total bilirubin, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and interactions of UDCA with race, gender, and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ≥1.1. Among untreated patients, African Americans and ASINPIs had higher mortality than whites (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.67 and aHR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.11-1.76, respectively). Among treated patients, this relationship was reversed (aHR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.86 and aHR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.67-1.16). Patterns were similar for liver transplant/death. UDCA reduced the risk of liver transplant/death in all patient groups and mortality across all groups except white women with aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ≥1.1. As compared to patients with low-normal bilirubin at baseline (≤0.4 mg/dL), those with high-normal (1.0 > 0.7) and mid-normal bilirubin (0.7 > 0.4) had significantly higher liver transplant/death and all-cause mortality.

DISCUSSION

African American and ASINPI patients who did not receive UDCA had significantly higher mortality than white patients. Among African Americans, treatment was associated with significantly lower mortality. Regardless of UDCA treatment, higher baseline bilirubin, even within the normal range, was associated with increased mortality and liver transplant/death compared with low-normal levels.

Association Between Black Race and Presentation and Liver-Related Outcomes of Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

INTRODUCTION & AIMS

Small studies have found that black patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) present with more aggressive disease. We aimed to characterize the presentation and outcome in black and white patients with AIH.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study, collecting information from databases of patients with AIH attending the Institute of Liver studies at King's College Hospital, London (1971-October 2015, the Royal Free Hospital, London (1982 through December 2016) and the multicenter Dutch Autoimmune Hepatitis Study Group cohort (2006-August 2016). We identified 88 black patients with AIH and we compared their clinical characteristics and outcomes to 897 white patients with AIH.

RESULTS

Black patients presented at a younger age (median 38 years vs 45 years) (P = .007), had higher IgG levels (mean 31.0 mg/dL vs 27.5 mg/dL) (P = .04), but there were no significant differences between groups in auto-antibody profiles, International AIH Group scores, or sex distribution of disease. A higher proportion of black patients had systemic lupus erythematosus (10%) than white patients (2%) (P ≤ .001). There was no significant difference in proportions of patients with a response to standard therapy (86% for black patients vs 91% for white patients; P = .20) or in rate of relapse (57% vs 50%; P = .3). Despite this, black patients had an increased risk of liver transplantation and liver-related death (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.0; P < .001). Overall mortality was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In a comparison of black and white patients with AIH in Europe, we found that black patients present at a younger age, have higher levels of IgG levels, and a greater proportion have SLE. We also found black patients to have a greater risk of liver transplantation and liver-related mortality, indicating more aggressive disease.