1
|
Svenstrup L, Möller S, Fedder J, Pedersen DE, Erb K, Andersen CY, Humaidan P. Investigation of luteal HCG supplementation in GnRH-agonist-triggered fresh embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biomed Online 2024; 48:103415. [PMID: 38452605 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Does splitting the human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) support in IVF cycles triggered by a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist result in a better progesterone profile? DESIGN Randomized controlled three-arm study, performed at the Fertility Clinic, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Patients with 12-25 follicles ≥12 mm were randomized into three groups: Group 1 - ovulation triggered with 6500 IU HCG; Group 2 - ovulation triggered with 0.5 mg GnRH agonist, followed by 1500 IU HCG on the day of oocyte retrieval (OCR); and Group 3 - ovulation triggered with 0.5 mg GnRH agonist, followed by 1000 IU HCG on the day of OCR and 500 IU HCG on OCR + 5. All groups received 180 mg vaginal progesterone. Progesterone concentrations were analysed in eight blood samples from each patient. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients completed the study. Baseline and laboratory data were comparable. Progesterone concentration peaked on OCR + 4 in Groups 1 and 2, and peaked on OCR + 6 in Group 3. On OCR + 6, the progesterone concentration in Group 2 was significantly lower compared with Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). On OCR + 8, the progesterone concentration in Group 3 was significantly higher compared with the other groups (both P<0.001). Progesterone concentrations were significantly higher in Group 3 from OCR + 6 until OCR + 14 compared with the other groups (all P ≤ 0.003). Four patients developed ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in Group 3. CONCLUSION Sequential HCG support after a GnRH agonist trigger provides a better progesterone concentration in the luteal phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Svenstrup
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Fertility Clinic, Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Sören Möller
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jens Fedder
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Fertility Clinic, Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Dorrit Elschner Pedersen
- Fertility Clinic, Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karin Erb
- Fertility Clinic, Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Claus Yding Andersen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Humaidan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; The Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Skive, Denmark; Faculty of Health, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernández-Sánchez M, Fatemi H, García-Velasco JA, Heiser PW, Daftary GS, Mannaerts B. Incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger in "freeze-all" approach. Gynecol Endocrinol 2023; 39:2205952. [PMID: 37156263 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2023.2205952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders (25-35 follicles with a diameter of ≥12 mm on day of triggering) who received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to trigger final follicular maturation. METHODS We used individual data from women who participated in four different clinical trials and were high responders to ovarian stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol in this retrospective combined analysis. All women were evaluated for signs and symptoms of OHSS using identical criteria based on Golan's system (1989). RESULTS High responders (n = 77) were of different ethnicities. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between women with or without signs and symptoms of OHSS. Mean ± standard deviation baseline data were: age, 32.3 ± 3.5 years; anti-Müllerian hormone, 42.4 ± 20.7 pmol/L; antral follicle count, 21.5 ± 9.2. Before triggering, duration of stimulation was 9.5 ± 1.6 days and the mean number of follicles with a diameter of ≥12 mm and ≥17 mm was 26.5 ± 4.4 and 8.8 ± 4.7, respectively. Mean serum estradiol (17,159 pmol/l) and progesterone (5.1 nmol/l) levels were high at 36 h after triggering. Overall, 17/77 high responders (22%) developed signs and symptoms of mild OHSS which lasted 6-21 days. The most frequently prescribed medication was cabergoline to prevent worsening of OHSS. No severe OHSS occurred and no OHSS cases were reported as serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS High responders receiving GnRH agonist for triggering should be informed that they may experience signs and symptoms of mild OHSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Fernández-Sánchez
- IVI-RMA Seville, Seville, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
- Fundacion IVI, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - H Fatemi
- ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - J A García-Velasco
- Fundacion IVI, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- Reproductive Medicine Department, IVIRMA Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - P W Heiser
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA
| | - G S Daftary
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA
| | - B Mannaerts
- Reproductive Medicine & Maternal Health, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kastrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Gennarelli G, Guido M, Alviggi C, Conforti A, Livi C, Revelli A, Colamaria S, Argento C, Giuliani M, De Angelis C, Matteo M, Canosa S, D’Alfonso A, Cimadomo V, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:663-673. [PMID: 35128583 PMCID: PMC8995212 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02409-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our primary objective was to assess whether immediately undergoing a second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) for advanced-maternal-age and/or poor-ovarian-reserve (AMA/POR) patients obtaining ≤ 3 blastocysts for preimplantation-genetic-testing-for-aneuploidies (PGT-A) is more efficient than the conventional-approach. METHODS All AMA/POR patients obtaining ≤ 3 blastocysts after conventional-stimulation between 2017 and 2019 were proposed DuoStim, and 143 couples accepted (DuoStim-group) and were matched for the main confounders to 143 couples who did not accept (conventional-group). GnRH-antagonist protocol with recombinant-gonadotrophins and agonist trigger, intra-cytoplasmatic-sperm-injection (ICSI) with ejaculated sperm, PGT-A and vitrified-warmed euploid single-blastocyst-transfer(s) were performed. The primary outcome was the cumulative-live-birth-delivery-rate per intention-to-treat (CLBdR per ITT) within 1 year. If not delivering, the conventional-group had 1 year to undergo another conventional-stimulation. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also conducted. RESULTS The CLBdR was 10.5% in the conventional-group after the first attempt. Only 12 of the 128 non-pregnant patients returned (165 ± 95 days later; drop-out = 116/128,90.6%), and 3 delivered. Thus, the 1-year CLBdR was 12.6% (N = 18/143). In the DuoStim-group, the CLBdR was 24.5% (N = 35/143; p = 0.01), 2 women delivered twice and 13 patients have other euploid blastocysts after a LB (0 and 2 in the conventional-group). DuoStim resulted in an incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratio of 23,303€. DuoStim was costlier and more effective in 98.7% of the 1000 pseudo-replicates generated through bootstrapping, and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves unveiled that DuoStim would be more cost-effective than the conventional-approach at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 23,100€. CONCLUSIONS During PGT-A treatments in AMA/POR women, DuoStim can be suggested in progress to rescue poor blastocyst yields after conventional-stimulation. It might indeed prevent drop-out or further aging between attempts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Vaiarelli
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- grid.487136.f0000 0004 1756 2878GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Guido
- grid.158820.60000 0004 1757 2611MeSVA Department, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- grid.4691.a0000 0001 0790 385XDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Conforti
- grid.4691.a0000 0001 0790 385XDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Revelli
- GeneraLife IVF, Livet, Turin Italy ,grid.7605.40000 0001 2336 6580Obstetrics and Gynaecology SCDU1, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Sant’Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Colamaria
- grid.487136.f0000 0004 1756 2878GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Cindy Argento
- grid.487136.f0000 0004 1756 2878GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Giuliani
- grid.487136.f0000 0004 1756 2878GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo De Angelis
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Operative Unit of Obstetrics, Fabia Mater Clinic, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Matteo
- grid.10796.390000000121049995Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Physiopathology and Reproductive Unit, University Hospital of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Angela D’Alfonso
- grid.158820.60000 0004 1757 2611MeSVA Department, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Laura Rienzi
- grid.487136.f0000 0004 1756 2878GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- grid.487136.f0000 0004 1756 2878GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris, 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iorio GG, Rovetto MY, Conforti A, Carbone L, Vallone R, Cariati F, Bagnulo F, Di Girolamo R, La Marca A, Alviggi C. Severe Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in a Woman With Breast Cancer Under Letrozole Triggered With GnRH Agonist: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2021; 3:704153. [PMID: 36303992 PMCID: PMC9580822 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2021.704153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We report a rare case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in a 28-year-old woman with breast cancer and with a history of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) despite treatment with letrozole and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) triggering in a GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol without the administration of any human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for luteal-phase support. The patient, who underwent controlled ovarian syndrome (COS)-oocyte cryopreservation before chemotherapy, required hospitalization. Complete recovery was achieved after treatment with volume expanders, human albumin, and cabergoline. Based on our case and literature review, it is possible to establish that estradiol (E2) modulation with letrozole and GnRH-a triggering does not eliminate the risk of OHSS. Furthermore, it is advisable to postpone GnRH-a depot to minimize the risk of OHSS after the suspension of letrozole, following menstruation or at least 7–8 days after triggering. It would be desirable to identify high-risk patients, also on a genetic basis, in order to avoid delays in oncologic treatments that could strongly impact life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Gabriele Iorio
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giuseppe Gabriele Iorio orcid.org/0000-0002-1723-3420
| | - Marika Ylenia Rovetto
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Carbone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Vallone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Federica Cariati
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Bagnulo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaella Di Girolamo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Antonio La Marca
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. Reply: 'Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle', probably a terminology more appropriate than 'luteal phase stimulation' in the DuoStim protocol. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:1723-1724. [PMID: 33615387 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF Centers, Rome 00197, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF Centers, Rome 00197, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Alviggi E, Sansone A, Trabucco E, Dusi L, Buffo L, Barnocchi N, Fiorini F, Colamaria S, Giuliani M, Argento C, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:2598-2608. [PMID: 32951051 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are the reproductive outcomes (clinical, obstetric and perinatal) different between follicular phase stimulation (FPS)- and luteal phase stimulation (LPS)-derived euploid blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER No difference was observed between FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocysts after vitrified-warmed single embryo transfer (SET). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Technical improvements in IVF allow the implementation non-conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols for oncologic and poor prognosis patients. One of these protocols begins LPS 5 days after FPS is ended (DuoStim). Although, several studies have reported similar embryological outcomes (e.g. fertilization, blastulation, euploidy) between FPS- and LPS-derived cohort of oocytes, information on the reproductive (clinical, obstetric and perinatal) outcomes of LPS-derived blastocysts is limited to small and retrospective studies. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Multicenter study conducted between October 2015 and March 2019 including all vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfers after DuoStim. Only first transfers of good quality blastocysts (≥BB according to Gardner and Schoolcraft's classification) were included. If euploid blastocysts obtained after both FPS and LPS were available the embryo to transfer was chosen blindly. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfer in the two groups. To achieve 80% power (α = 0.05) to rule-out a 15% difference in the LBR, a total of 366 first transfers were required. Every other clinical, as well as obstetric and perinatal outcomes, were recorded. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Throughout the study period, 827 patients concluded a DuoStim cycle and among them, 339 did not identify any transferable blastocyst, 145 had an euploid blastocyst after FPS, 186 after LPS and 157 after both FPS and LPS. Fifty transfers of poor quality euploid blastocysts were excluded and 49 patients did not undergo an embryo transfer during the study period. Thus, 389 patients had a vitrified-warmed SET of a good quality euploid blastocyst (182 after FPS and 207 after LPS). For 126 cases (32%) where both FPS- and LPS-derived good quality blastocysts were available, the embryo transferred was chosen blindly with a 'True Random Number Generator' function where '0' stood for FPS-derived euploid blastocysts and '1' for LPS-derived ones (n = 70 and 56, respectively) on the website random.org. All embryos were obtained with the same ovarian stimulation protocol in FPS and LPS (GnRH antagonist protocol with fixed dose of rec-FSH plus rec-LH and GnRH-agonist trigger), culture conditions (continuous culture in a humidified atmosphere with 37°C, 6% CO2 and 5% O2) and laboratory protocols (ICSI, trophectoderm biopsy in Day 5-7 without assisted hatching in Day 3, vitrification and comprehensive chromosome testing). The women whose embryos were included had similar age (FPS: 38.5 ± 3.1 and LPS: 38.5 ± 3.2 years), prevalence of male factor, antral follicle count, basal hormonal characteristics, main cause of infertility and previous reproductive history (i.e. previous live births, miscarriages and implantation failures) whether the embryo came from FPS or LPS. All transfers were conducted after warming in an artificial cycle. The blastocysts transferred after FPS and LPS were similar in terms of day of full-development and morphological quality. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The positive pregnancy test rates for FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocysts were 57% and 62%, biochemical pregnancy loss rates were 10% and 8%, miscarriage rates were 15% and 14% and LBRs were 44% (n = 80/182, 95% CI 37-51%) and 49% (n = 102/207, 95% CI 42-56%; P = 0.3), respectively. The overall odds ratio for live birth (LPS vs FPS (reference)) adjusted for day of blastocyst development and quality, was 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.0, P = 0.2. Among patients with euploid blastocysts obtained following both FPS and LPS, the LBRs were also similar (53% (n = 37/70, 95% CI 41-65%) and 48% (n = 27/56, 95% CI 35-62%) respectively; P = 0.7). Gestational issues were experienced by 7.5% of pregnant women after FPS- and 10% of women following LPS-derived euploid single blastocyst transfer. Perinatal issues were reported in 5% and 0% of the FPS- and LPS-derived newborns, respectively. The gestational weeks and birthweight were similar in the two groups. A 5% pre-term delivery rate was reported in both groups. A low birthweight was registered in 2.5% and 5% of the newborns, while 4% and 7% showed high birthweight, in FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocyst, respectively. Encompassing the 81 FPS-derived newborns, a total of 9% were small and 11% large for gestational age. Among the 102 LPS-derived newborns, 8% were small and 6% large for gestational age. No significant difference was reported for all these comparisons. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The LPS-derived blastocysts were all obtained after FPS in a DuoStim protocol. Therefore, studies are required with LPS-only, late-FPS and random start approaches. The study is powered to assess differences in the LBR per embryo transfer, therefore obstetric and perinatal outcomes should be considered observational. Although prospective, the study was not registered. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study represents a further backing of the safety of non-conventional COS protocols. Therefore, LPS after FPS (DuoStim protocol) is confirmed a feasible and efficient approach also from clinical, obstetric and perinatal perspectives, targeted at patients who need to reach the transfer of an euploid blastocyst in the shortest timeframe possible due to reasons such as cancer, advanced maternal age and/or reduced ovarian reserve and poor ovarian response. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,Clinica Ruesch, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Napoli, Italy.,GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy.,GENERA Umbria, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Umbertide, Italy
| | - Erminia Alviggi
- Clinica Ruesch, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Napoli, Italy
| | - Anna Sansone
- Clinica Ruesch, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Ludovica Dusi
- GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | - Laura Buffo
- GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio Fiorini
- GENERA Umbria, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Umbertide, Italy
| | - Silvia Colamaria
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Giuliani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Cindy Argento
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,Clinica Ruesch, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Napoli, Italy.,GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,Clinica Ruesch, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Napoli, Italy.,GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Popovic-Todorovic B, Santos-Ribeiro S, Drakopoulos P, De Vos M, Racca A, Mackens S, Thorrez Y, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Quintero L, Blockeel C. Predicting suboptimal oocyte yield following GnRH agonist trigger by measuring serum LH at the start of ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 2020; 34:2027-2035. [PMID: 31560740 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are the LH levels at the start of ovarian stimulation predictive of suboptimal oocyte yield from GnRH agonist triggering in GnRH antagonist down-regulated cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER LH levels at the start of ovarian stimulation are an independent predictor of suboptimal oocyte yield following a GnRH agonist trigger. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY A GnRH agonist ovulation trigger may result in an inadequate oocyte yield in a small subset of patients. This failure can range from empty follicle syndrome to the retrieval of much fewer oocytes than expected. Suboptimal response to a GnRH agonist trigger has been defined as the presence of circulating LH levels <15 IU/l 12 h after triggering. It has been shown that patients with immeasurable LH levels on trigger day have an up to 25% risk of suboptimal response. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION In this retrospective cohort study, all patients (n = 3334) who received GnRH agonist triggering (using Triptoreline 0.2 mg) for final oocyte maturation undergoing a GnRH antagonist cycle in our centre from 2011 to 2017 were included. The primary outcome of the study was oocyte yield, defined as the ratio between the total number of collected oocytes and the number of follicles with a mean diameter >10 mm prior to GnRH agonist trigger. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The endocrine profile of all patients was studied at initiation as well as at the end of ovarian stimulation. In order to evaluate whether LH levels, not only at the end but also at the start, of ovarian stimulation predicted oocyte yield, we performed multivariable regression analysis adjusting for the following confounding factors: female age, body mass index, oral contraceptives before treatment, basal and trigger day estradiol levels, starting FSH levels, use of highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin and total gonadotropin dose. Suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger was defined as <10th percentile of oocyte yield. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The average age was 31.9 years, and the mean oocyte yield was 89%. The suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger cut-off (<10th percentile) was 45%, which was exhibited by 340 patients. Following confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analysis showed that LH levels at the initiation of ovarian stimulation remained an independent predictor of suboptimal response even in the multivariable model (adjusted OR 0.920, 95% CI 0.871-0.971). Patients with immeasurable LH levels at the start of stimulation (<0.1 IU/l) had a 45.2% risk of suboptimal response, while the risk decreased with increasing basal LH levels; baseline circulating LH <0.5 IU/L, <2 IU/L and <5 IU/L were associated with a 39.1%, 25.2% and 13.6% risk, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The main limitation of the study is its retrospective design. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This is the largest study of GnRH agonist trigger cycles only, since most of the previous research on the predictive value of basal LH levels was performed in dual trigger cycles. LH values should be measured prior to start of ovarian stimulation. In cases where they are immeasurable, suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger can be anticipated, and an individualized approach is warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) There was no funding and no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Santos-Ribeiro
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Jette, Belgium.,IVI-RMA, Lisboa, Avenida Infante Dom Henrique, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - P Drakopoulos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Jette, Belgium
| | - M De Vos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Jette, Belgium
| | - A Racca
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Jette, Belgium
| | - S Mackens
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Jette, Belgium
| | - Y Thorrez
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Jette, Belgium
| | - G Verheyen
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Jette, Belgium
| | - H Tournaye
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Jette, Belgium
| | - L Quintero
- IMER - Instituto de Medicina Reproductiva, Avda. de Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
| | - C Blockeel
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Jette, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lawrenz B, Garrido N, Samir S, Ruiz F, Melado L, Fatemi HM. Individual luteolysis pattern after GnRH-agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176600. [PMID: 28459828 PMCID: PMC5411051 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Final oocyte maturation using GnRH-agonist trigger in a GnRH-antagonist protocol is increasingly common, as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is almost completely avoided. However, this approach might lead to reduced pregnancy rates due to severe luteolysis. This proof of concept study evaluated the extend of luteolysis by measuring progesterone levels 48 hours after oocyte retrieval in 51 patients, who received GnRH-agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation in a GnRH-antagonist protocol due to the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. It was shown, that luteolysis after GnRHa-trigger differs greatly among patients, with progesterone levels ranging from 13.0 ng/ml to ≥ 60.0 ng/ml, 48 hours after oocyte retrieval. Significant positive correlations could be demonstrated between progesterone levels and the number of ovarian stimulation and suppression days (p = 0.006 and p = 0.002 respectively), the total amount of medication used for ovarian suppression (p = 0.015), the level of progesterone on the day of final oocyte maturation (p = 0.008) and the number of retrieved oocytes (p = 0.019). Therefore it was concluded, that luteolysis after GnRH-agonist trigger is patient-specific and also luteal phase support requires individualization. Longer stimulation duration as well as a higher level of progesterone on the day of final oocyte maturation and more retrieved oocytes will result in higher levels of progesterone 48 hours after oocyte retrieval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Lawrenz
- IVF department, IVI Middle-East Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE
- Obstetrical Department, Women´s university hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Suzan Samir
- IVF department, IVI Middle-East Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Francisco Ruiz
- IVF department, IVI Middle-East Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Laura Melado
- IVF department, IVI Middle-East Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Human M. Fatemi
- IVF department, IVI Middle-East Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| |
Collapse
|