Emerging from the database shadows: characterizing undocumented immigrants in a large cohort of HIV-infected persons

Factors Influencing Engagement Across the Motivational PrEP Cascade Among Latino SMM: A Mixed-Methods Analysis from the Perspectives of Community Providers and Latino SMM

Latino sexual minority men (SMM) are a highly vulnerable population to HIV, and while pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has emerged as a promising biomedical tool for HIV prevention among them, its utilization remains disproportionately low in this community despite its potential. Understanding the barriers along the PrEP continuum of care, known as the "PrEP cascade," is crucial for effectively implementing PrEP interventions. Therefore, the objective of our study was twofold: first, to explore the stage of Latino SMM in the PrEP cascade by examining disparities in demographics, social factors, and healthcare aspects; second, to gain insights from healthcare providers who have direct clinical experience with our population regarding the challenges faced by Latino SMM in accessing and adhering to PrEP. Based on the study findings, the majority of participants (n = 74; 49%) were in the contemplation stage, and only one in ten Latino SMM (10.6%) were currently adherent to PrEP. Compared to those who were at least second-generation, first-generation status had a positive association (B = 0.699, SE = 0.208, β = 0.351, p < .001) with engagement along the PrEP Contemplation Ladder. Conversely, having at least one parent who did not have legal residency, relative to those whose parents were both U.S. citizens or held legal residency documentation, was found to have a negative association (B = - 0.689, SE = 0.245, β = 0.245, p = .006) with engagement along the PrEP Contemplation Ladder. Additionally, discussing PrEP with a healthcare provider had a positive association (B = 0.374, SE = 0.179, β = 0.185, p = .038) with engagement along the PrEP Contemplation Ladder. Qualitative results from our study suggest that some Latinos who initially agreed to start using PrEP ended up getting lost in the care pipeline and failed to attend their scheduled appointments. Providers also noted that many patients lacked access to a pharmacy where they felt comfortable obtaining their PrEP prescription, leading them to discontinue use after only a few months. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the unique needs, culture, and background of Latinos, including care delivery and provider attitudes that can facilitate progress through the PrEP cascade.

Increased Traumatic Brain Injury Severity and Mortality in Undocumented Immigrants

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Health disparities related to traumatic brain injury (TBI) have focused on socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. We sought to characterize TBI patterns and outcomes based on undocumented status.

METHODS

Patients who presented to University of California, San Diego Health Trauma Center with a TBI between 2019 and 2022 were identified and stratified based on undocumented status. Undocumented immigrants were identified using validated methods of absent or invalid social security number and key terms through chart review. Demographic information, injury characteristics, and neurosurgical interventions were recorded. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the impact of patient factors on outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1654 patients with TBI, 76 (4.6%) were undocumented. Undocumented immigrants were younger (50 vs 60 years; P < .001) and had higher Injury Severity Score (17 vs 13; P < .001). They presented from farther distances (12.8 vs 5.3 miles, P < .001) with greater midline shift (1.49 vs 0.91 mm; P = .003). A greater proportion had basal cistern compression/effacement (14% vs 4.6%; P = .001) and required neurosurgical intervention (18% vs 9.6%; P = .012). Undocumented immigrants had higher hospital charges ($208 403 vs $128 948; P < .001), length of stay (5 vs 4 days; P = .002), and were discharged to a health facility at a lower rate (18% vs 32%; P = .012). They had nearly double the mortality rate (14% vs 7.3%; P = .021), with undocumented status trending as a predictor on multivariable regression (odds ratio = 2.87; P = .052).

CONCLUSION

Undocumented immigrants presented from farther distances with increased TBI severity, likely from both more severe trauma and delayed presentation, requiring more neurosurgical intervention. They also had greater length of stay, charges, and nearly double the mortality rate. Importantly, undocumented status was a strong predictor for mortality. Despite worse outcomes, they were discharged to a health care facility at a lower rate. Advocacy efforts should be directed at increasing health care coverage and migrant community engagement and education.

Delayed Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the Latino Population at a Federally Qualified Community Health Center in New Jersey

Late diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with early progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). We examined racial/ethnic differences in presentation with advanced HIV/AIDS at a community health center in New Jersey. Records of patients diagnosed with HIV between 1990 and 2018 were reviewed. Odds ratios (OR) of presenting with AIDS at HIV diagnosis were computed in unadjusted and adjusted models. There were 182 (48.3%) Latino, 48 (12.7%) non-Latino White (NLW), 130 (34.5%) non-Latino Black, and 17 (4.5%) non-Latino of other race/ethnicity included in the analysis. Over 75% of the Latinos were foreign-born. Latino patients had higher odds of presentation with AIDS at time of HIV diagnosis than NLW in unadjusted (OR = 4.85, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.28-10.31) and adjusted models (OR = 3.71, 95%CI: 1.60-8.59). Latino patients, particularly foreign-born and bisexual, had higher odds of being diagnosed with AIDS at presentation with HIV in this cohort.

Birth Country Influences the Choice of Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals: Experience From a French HIV Centre

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether antiretroviral therapy (ART) prescriptions differ between naive and virally suppressed HIV patients born in France (PBFs) and in Sub-Saharan Africa (PBSSAs).

SETTING

Observational single-center study.

METHODS

We included all PBFs and PBSSAs who entered into care at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France, from 01/01/2000 to 31/12/2018, with plasma HIV-RNA>200 copies/mL. We first compared the initial ART in naive PBFs and PBSSAs. Second, we compared the last-prescribed ART (including drug-reduced ART: daily 2-drug regimens, daily 1-drug regimens and intermittent 3-drug regimens) in virally suppressed PBFs and PBSSAs, by focusing on patients in care in 2018 with HIV-RNA <50 copies for at least 24 months. A univariable and multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the impact of geographical origin on ART prescriptions.

RESULTS

A total of 1944 naive patients were included (915 PBSSAs and 1029 PBFs). PBSSAs were more frequently women, hepatitis B coinfected, with a lower pretherapeutic CD4 T-cell count, and most had tuberculosis at HIV diagnosis. After adjustment for confounders, PBSSAs were more likely to receive a first-line protease inhibitor-based regimen (OR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.31 to 1.98), and less likely to receive an integrase inhibitor-based regimen (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.88). Of the 968 virally suppressed patients (431 PBSSAs and 537 PBFs), PBSSAs were less likely to receive drug-reduced ART, including 2-drug regimens and intermittent three-drug regimens (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in ART prescriptions between PBSSAs and PBFs were not only explained by different clinical and virologic situations. Personal motivations of doctors in choosing ART according to country of birth need to be explored.

Post-immigration factors affecting retention in HIV care and viral suppression in Latin American and Caribbean immigrant populations in the United States: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To reduce disparities in HIV care outcomes among Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) immigrants living with HIV in the U.S., it is necessary to identify factors influencing HIV care in this population. A systematic review that provides a comprehensive understanding of factors influencing retention in HIV care and viral suppression among LAC immigrants living with HIV in the U.S. is lacking. This systematic review used the Immigrant Health Services Utilization theoretical framework to provide an understanding of these factors.

DESIGN

We searched for peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ASSIA, from January 1996 to June 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 17 qualitative (n = 10) and quantitative (n = 7) studies were included in the review. The most commonly reported general and immigrant-specific factors appearing in studies were undocumented immigration status, HIV stigma, homophobia, cultural norms, values and beliefs, family and social support, language barriers, structure, complexity and quality of the U.S. healthcare delivery system, and patient-provider relationship.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the importance of considering immigrant-specific factors along with general factors to improve the provision of HIV care services and HIV care outcomes among LAC immigrant populations.

Brief Report: Role of Gender-Affirming Hormonal Care in HIV Care Continuum Outcomes When Comparing Transgender Women With Cisgender Sexual Minority Men

BACKGROUND

Transgender women (transwomen) are frequently conflated with cisgender sexual minority men (cis-SMM) in HIV research. We examined the impact of socioeconomic and health conditions, and gender-affirming hormones in comparing HIV-related outcomes between cis-SMM and transwomen.

SETTING

Large tertiary care health system in the Bronx, NY.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of people with HIV receiving care in 2008-2017. We compared retention in care, antiretroviral therapy (ART) prescription, and viral suppression between cis-SMM and transwomen, using modified Poisson regression, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Transwomen were further stratified by receipt of estrogen prescription.

RESULTS

We included 166 transwomen (1.4%), 1936 cis-SMM (17%), 4715 other cisgender men (41%), and 4745 cisgender women (41%). Transwomen were more likely to have public insurance (78% vs 65%) and mental health (49% vs 39%) or substance use (43% vs 33%) diagnoses than cis-SMM. Compared with cis-SMM, transwomen prescribed estrogen (67% of transwomen) were more likely to be retained [adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.23), prescribed ART (aRR 1.06, CI 1.01 to 1.11), and virally suppressed (aRR 1.08, CI 1.01 to 1.16). Transwomen not prescribed estrogen were less likely to be retained (aRR 0.92, CI 0.83 to 1.02), prescribed ART (aRR 0.90, CI 0.82 to 0.98), or virally suppressed (aRR 0.85, CI 0.76 to 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of HIV, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and gender-affirming care distinguish transwomen from cis-SMM. Compared with cis-SMM, transwomen who were prescribed estrogen had better HIV care continuum outcomes; transwomen not prescribed estrogen had worse outcomes. These differences should be accounted for in HIV-related research.

Algorithm to identify transgender and gender nonbinary individuals among people living with HIV performs differently by age and ethnicity

PURPOSE

HIV research among transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) people is limited by lack of gender identity data collection. We designed an EHR-based algorithm to identify TGNB people among people living with HIV (PLWH) when gender identity was not systematically collected.

METHODS

We applied EHR-based search criteria to all PLWH receiving care at a large urban health system between 1997 and 2017, then confirmed gender identity by chart review. We compared patient characteristics by gender identity and screening criteria, then calculated positive predictive values for each criterion.

RESULTS

Among 18,086 PLWH, 213 (1.2%) met criteria as potential TGNB patients and 178/213 were confirmed. Positive predictive values were highest for free-text keywords (91.7%) and diagnosis codes (77.4%). Confirmed TGNB patients were younger (median 32.5 vs. 42.5 years, P < .001) and less likely to be Hispanic (37.1% vs. 62.9%, P = .03) than unconfirmed patients. Among confirmed patients, 15% met criteria only for prospective gender identity data collection and were significantly older.

CONCLUSION

EHR-based criteria can identify TGNB PLWH, but success may differ by ethnicity and age. Retrospective versus intentional, prospective gender identity data collection may capture different patients. To reduce misclassification in epidemiologic studies, gender identity data collection should address these potential differences and be systematic and prospective.

The Health of Undocumented Latinx Immigrants: What We Know and Future Directions

Undocumented Latinx immigrants experience unique factors prior to migration, during migration, and after migration that shape their health. Our review summarizes the limited but growing literature highlighting how exposure to trauma, immigration enforcement, changes to social networks, and discrimination negatively affect the mental and physical health of undocumented Latinx immigrants. We also discuss how policies and social ties can promote their health. We focus on areas of particular concern, including health care, mental health, and HIV. Future research should use interdisciplinary approaches and intersectional frameworks to understand and address health inequities. Conducting research with undocumented Latinx immigrant communities requires community engagement, assurance of confidentiality, and creative recruitment and retention strategies. Recommendations for public health practice include investing in community health centers and organizations to ensure access to health and social services; presenting results with sufficient contextualization to interpret their generalizability; and advocating for federal-, state-, and local-level policy changes that reduce the negative health consequences associated with being undocumented.

Documenting best practices for maintaining access to HIV prevention, care and treatment in an era of shifting immigration policy and discourse

Changes in the United States federal-level political landscape have been felt within immigrant communities, and the public health clinics that serve them. We sought to document how HIV prevention and care clinics are reaching and retaining their immigrant community patients during a period of retrenchment of accessible public resources and immigrant rights. From May 2018 through January 2019, we conducted 20 in-depth interviews with clinicians, case workers, advocates, legal experts, and peer navigators in Northern and Central California. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Several themes emerged which can be grouped into three primary areas: changes post-election, challenges meeting the needs of patients, and best practices for maintaining access to prevention and care services. Post-election, providers reported some of their patients skipping clinic appointments due to fear of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids and deportation while other patients had moved to locations that they felt were less policed. Challenges emerged around linguistic competency, meeting basic needs such as housing stability and employment, and treating mental health sequelae resulting from trauma experienced in home countries or during migration itself. Best practices included hiring bi-lingual and bi-cultural staff, linking to legal services to assist with immigration status, holding trainings around immigrant rights and responses to ICE raids, and building trust with immigrant patients by assuring them that their status would not be collected or reported. In light of adverse policy changes affecting immigrants, agencies have begun to institute best practices to mitigate the negative impact of those policies on their clients and patients.

HIV outcomes among migrants from low-income and middle-income countries living in high-income countries: a review of recent evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Migrants living in high-income countries are disproportionately affected by HIV infection and frequently have characteristics associated with poor HIV clinical outcomes. HIV epidemiology among migrants is influenced by changes in migration patterns and variations in transmission risk behaviors. Here we review the recently published literature on known HIV outcomes among migrants from low-income and middle-income countries living in high-income countries.

RECENT FINDINGS

High proportions of migrants acquire HIV after migration, and this group frequently presents to care late. Once established in care, migrants are often more likely to experience worse HIV treatment outcomes compared with native populations. Multiple individual and structural factors influence HIV diagnosis and treatment outcomes among migrants, including disruption of social networks, increased sexual risk behaviors, communication barriers, limited access to care, and stigma. Few studies have examined interventions targeted at improving HIV outcomes among migrants.

SUMMARY

Stigma and limited access to care appear to be primary drivers of poor HIV outcomes among migrants in high-income countries. Addressing these disparities is limited by difficulties in identifying and monitoring this population as well as a lack of evidence regarding appropriate interventions for migrants living with HIV. Improving outcomes for this group requires interventions that are specifically targeted at this marginalized and growing population.

HIV Testing, Risk Behaviors, and Fear: A Comparison of Documented and Undocumented Latino Immigrants

Latino immigrants in the United States are at elevated risk for HIV infection and delayed HIV diagnosis. Immigration documentation status and its contribution to fears are important barriers to accessing health services including HIV testing. A currently changing political climate within the United States may have increased the complexity of the intersection of documentation status and health care access. This study used an anonymous survey conducted in March and April 2017 in New York City to compare: sociodemographic characteristics, HIV testing behaviors, HIV risk behaviors, and perceptions of fear around HIV testing among documented and undocumented Latino immigrants (N = 301). We found that undocumented immigrants reported lower levels of education, income, and health insurance than did documented immigrants. However, groups did not differ in having tested for HIV in the last 12 months, in future intentions to test for HIV, or in emotional/cognitive perceptions of fear around HIV testing. Undocumented immigrants reported lower rates of having ever tested for HIV in their lifetime (68.6%) than documented immigrants (80.5%) (p = 0.027). In conclusion, we found that despite sociodemographic challenges, undocumented immigrants had similar HIV testing behaviors as their documented counterparts in our study community. Further understanding of the mitigating factors that resulted in seemingly equal access to HIV testing in this community for undocumented immigrants is warranted.

Outcomes Along the HIV Care Continuum Among Undocumented Immigrants in Clinical Care

HIV-infected undocumented immigrants face unique barriers to care yet little is known about their clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of HIV-infected adults in clinical care from 2006 to 2014 at a large academic medical center in a setting where medical insurance is available to HIV-infected undocumented immigrants. Undocumented status was assessed based on Social Security number and insurance status and verified through medical chart review. Using Poisson regression models, we compared undocumented and documented patients with respect to retention in care (≥2 HIV-related laboratory tests ≥90 days apart), antiretroviral therapy (ART) prescription (≥3 active antiretroviral agents prescribed in a year), and viral suppression (HIV RNA <200 copies/ml for the last measured viral load) for each year in care. Of 7,551 patients included in the analysis, we classified 173 (2.3%) as undocumented. For each year of the analysis, higher proportions of undocumented patients were retained in care, prescribed ART, and virally suppressed. In adjusted models, undocumented status was associated with increased probability of retention in care [risk ratio (RR) 1.05, confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-1.09], ART prescription (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), and viral suppression (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.19) compared to documented status. Undocumented patients achieved clinical outcomes at modestly higher rates than documented patients, despite entering care with more advanced disease. In a setting where insurance is available to undocumented patients, similar outcomes along the HIV care continuum may be achieved regardless of immigration status.