60 Minutes for health: examining the feasibility and acceptability of a low-resource behavioral intervention designed to promote retention in HIV care

Project RETAIN: Providing Integrated Care for People With HIV Who Use Cocaine

Background

People with HIV (PWH) who use cocaine are less likely to achieve virologic suppression (<200 copies/mL) because of poor engagement in care. We tested the efficacy of an integrated substance use treatment and outpatient HIV care intervention on improving viral suppression in nonsuppressed PWH who use cocaine.

Methods

Project RETAIN recruited 360 cocaine-using PWH who were not virologically suppressed in Miami, FL, and Atlanta, GA. Patients were randomized to treatment as usual (TAU) or the intervention, which included patient navigation and substance use treatment with motivational enhancement therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy. The primary outcome assessed viral suppression at 6- and 12-month follow-up.

Results

There was no difference in viral suppression by group (TAU = 17.1%, intervention = 15.6%, P = .897). The intervention group had significantly more participation in substance use treatment (87.0%) than TAU (7.2%, P < .001). There were significant decreases in stimulant use in both groups, but oxycodone use decreased more in the intervention group. Severe psychological distress (32% of the baseline sample) declined differentially at 6 months (TAU = 24.5%, intervention = 16.1%, P = .0492).

Conclusions

Only a minority of PWH who used cocaine became virally suppressed over the 12-month study, with no effect of the integrated intervention. Patients in the intervention did have reduced psychological distress postintervention. Despite more substance use treatment in the intervention, both groups declined equally in substance use. Interventions that improve retention in care and viral suppression are needed for this vulnerable population, including those that address their other complex medical and psychosocial needs.

ClinicalTrialsgov

NCT01614106.

Randomized Controlled Trial of 60 minutes for Health With Rapid Antiretroviral Therapy to Reengage Persons With HIV Who Are Out of Care

BACKGROUND

Many persons with HIV remain out of care (PWH-OOC). We evaluated InstaCare, a complex intervention integrating the brief behavioral intervention 60 minutes for Health with the rapid restart of antiretroviral therapy (rapid ART).

SETTING

Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial among PWH-OOC in San Diego, USA.

METHODS

PWH-OOC were randomized 1:1 to InstaCare or a time-and-attention control integrating a diet-and-nutrition behavioral intervention also with rapid ART initiation (restart ≤7 days from enrollment). All participants had access to support services (free transport, HIV peer navigation, adherence counseling, and linkage to care) and primary care services (mental health, case management, social work, medication-assisted treatment, and specialist pharmacy). The primary outcomes were viral suppression (<50 copies/mL) and re-engagement with care (≥2 HIV care visits >90 days apart) by 24 weeks. Outcomes were reported on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Between November 2020 and August 2022, 52 PWH-OOC were enrolled. Baseline substance use in the preceding month (49%), unstable housing (51%), moderate/severe depression (49%), and moderate/severe anxiety (41.7%) were prevalent. Rapid ART was provided for all participants. At week 24, the proportion with HIV viral load <50 copies/mL was 37.3% (19/51) (InstaCare 28.0%, control 46.2%, P = 0.25). Fourteen (27.5%) were engaged with care (InstaCare 7/25 [28.0%], control 7/26 [26.9%], P = 1.00). Most participants (94%) reported low or very low emotional distress associated with rapid ART. Study lost to follow-up by week 24 was high (23/51, 45%).

CONCLUSIONS

The InstaCare complex intervention did not improve viral suppression or reengagement with care among PWH-OOC. Investigation of high-intensity, individually adapted interventions is needed among PWH-OOC.

Strategies to improve HIV care outcomes for people with HIV who are out of care

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of five intervention strategies: patient navigation, appointment help/alerts, psychosocial support, transportation/appointment accompaniment, and data-to-care on HIV care outcomes among persons with HIV (PWH) who are out of care (OOC).

DESIGN

A systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched CDC's Prevention Research Synthesis (PRS) Project's cumulative HIV database to identify intervention studies conducted in the U.S., published between 2000 and 2020 that included comparisons between groups or prepost, and reported at least one relevant outcome (i.e. re-engagement or retention in HIV care, and viral suppression). Effect sizes were meta-analyzed using random-effect models to assess intervention effectiveness.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies reporting on 42 unique interventions met the inclusion criteria. Overall, intervention strategies are effective in improving re-engagement in care [odds ratio (OR) = 1.79;95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.36-2.36, k = 14], retention in care (OR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.64-2.64, k = 22), and viral suppression (OR = 2.50;95% CI: 1.87-3.34, k = 27). Patient navigation, appointment help/alerts, psychosocial support, and transportation/appointment accompaniment improved all three HIV care outcomes. Data-to-care improved re-engagement and retention but had insufficient evidence for viral suppression.

CONCLUSION

Several strategies are effective for improving HIV care outcomes among PWH who are OOC. More work is still needed for consistent definitions of OOC and HIV care outcomes, better reporting of intervention and cost data, and identifying how best to implement and scale-up effective strategies to engage and retain OOC PWH in care and reach the ending the HIV epidemic goals.

A systematic review of early adoption of implementation science for HIV prevention or treatment in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To provide the first systematic review of the early adoption of implementation science for HIV prevention or treatment in the United States. We identified primary research studies that addressed implementation of HIV prevention or treatment in the United States and qualitatively assessed the reporting of implementation outcomes and intervention descriptions.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases for evaluations of HIV prevention or treatment interventions that at least reported one implementation outcome and were published between 2014 and 2018. We used the 12-item Template for Intervention Description and Replication to assess study interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 2275 articles were identified. Thirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 84.6% used quantitative methods with 5% being hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies and 15% used qualitative methods. No studies cited a formal theoretical framework for implementation science. Acceptability and feasibility were the most frequently reported implementation outcomes. Eligible studies were diverse with regard to demographic categories. Most interventions focused on HIV prevention, particularly risk-reduction strategies. HIV treatment interventions targeted linkage to care and adherence to medications. Key implementation outcome findings indicated that these interventions are feasible and acceptable in the real world.

CONCLUSION

HIV implementation science could support dissemination of HIV prevention or treatment in the United States, although HIV treatment interventions are limited. Theoretical frameworks and key implementation outcomes like fidelity, penetration, and appropriateness could promote the rigor of future HIV treatment implementation research, helping the field deliver the promise of HIV prevention or treatment efforts in the United States.

Evaluation of smartphone APP-based case-management services among antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a randomized controlled trial protocol

Background

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionally affected by HIV in China. ‘Treatment as Prevention’ is a promising strategy for HIV prevention but requires adequate adherence. Mobile health (mHealth) may be an acceptable and feasible approach for service delivery, but there is little evidence supporting mHealth intervention for improving antiretroviral treatment adherence among HIV-infected MSM in low- and middle-income countries, including China. This study will aim to develop a smartphone application-based case-management service and compare its efficacy to standard care with regards to adherence, CD4, HIV viral load and psychosocial outcomes among MSM patients in Guangzhou, China.

Methods

A non-blinded 1:1 parallel-group randomised controlled trial will be conducted in Guangzhou Eighth People’s Hospital, with 300 MSM enrolled in each arm. Eligible MSM who are newly initiating ART will be randomly assigned to an intervention group (standard-of-care case management plus mHealth intervention) or a control group (standard-of-care case management). The development of the mHealth intervention will be based on the information–motivation–behavioural skills theory of ART adherence, and comprise four components: educational articles, one-to-one online communication with case managers, support-service information and hospital-visit reminders. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12. The primary outcomes will be ART adherence and CD4 count at month 6. Secondary outcomes include HIV RNA, sexual behaviours, mental health status, illness perceptions, and quality of life. χ² test and t-test will be used for between-group comparisons. Intervention effects will be evaluated using General estimating equation performed by SAS 9.0, on the principle of intention-to-treat. Structural equation modelling will be used to test potential mechanisms of intervention effect.

Discussion

This study is the first to explore the efficacy of mHealth intervention in the case management services targeted at HIV-infected MSM in low-and middle-income countries. Once proven effective, the innovative mHealth service could be integrated into the routine case management of PLWH. as well as be tailored to the patient management service for other chronic conditions.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03860116; Registered on 1 March 2019.

A need for implementation science to optimise the use of evidence-based interventions in HIV care: A systematic literature review

To improve health outcomes in people living with HIV, adoption of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) using effective and transferable implementation strategies to optimise the delivery of healthcare is needed. ViiV Healthcare's Positive Pathways initiative was established to support the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals. A compendium of EBIs was developed to address gaps within the HIV care continuum, yet it was unknown whether efforts existed to adapt and implement these EBIs across diverse clinical contexts. Therefore, this review sought to report on the use of implementation science in adapting HIV continuum of care EBIs. A systematic literature review was undertaken to summarise the evaluation of implementation and effectiveness outcomes, and report on the use of implementation science in HIV care. Ten databases were reviewed to identify studies (time-period: 2013-2018; geographic scope: United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Canada, Australia and Europe; English only publications). Studies were included if they reported on people living with HIV or those at risk of acquiring HIV and used interventions consistent with the EBIs. A broad range of study designs and methods were searched, including hybrid designs. Overall, 118 publications covering 225 interventions consistent with the EBIs were identified. These interventions were evaluated on implementation (N = 183), effectiveness (N = 81), or both outcomes (N = 39). High variability in the methodological approaches was observed. Implementation outcomes were frequently evaluated but use of theoretical frameworks was limited (N = 13). Evaluations undertaken to assess effectiveness were inconsistent, resulting in a range of measures. This review revealed extensive reporting on implementation science as defined using evaluation outcomes. However, high variability was observed in how implementation outcomes and effectiveness were defined, quantified, and reported. A more specific and consistent approach to conducting and reporting on implementation science in HIV could facilitate achievement of UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets.

Compound Retention in Care and All-Cause Mortality Among Persons Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Background

To obtain optimal health outcomes, persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) must be retained in clinical care. We examined the relationships between 4 possible combinations of 2 separate retention measures (missed visits and the Institute of Medicine [IOM] indicator) and all-cause mortality.

Methods

The sample included 4162 antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive patients who started ART between January 2000 and July 2010 at any of 5 US sites of the Center for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems. The independent variable of interest was retention, captured over the 12-month period after the initiation of ART. The study outcome, all-cause mortality 1 year after ART initiation, was determined by querying the Social Security Death Index or the National Death Index. We evaluated the associations of the 4 categories of retention with all-cause mortality, using the Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Ten percent of patients did not meet retention standards for either measure (hazard ratio [HR], 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-3.21). Patients retained by the IOM but not the missed-visits measure (42%) had a higher HR for mortality (1.72; 95% CI, 1.33-2.21) than patients retained by both measures (41%). Patients retained by the missed-visits but not the IOM measure (6%) had the same mortality hazards as patients retained by both measures (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, .54-1.87).

Conclusions

Missed visits within the first 12 months of ART initiation are a major risk factor for subsequent death. Incorporating missed visits in clinical and public health retention and viral suppression programming is advised.