Assessment of the benefit of achieving complete versus almost complete skin clearance in psoriasis: a patient's perspective

Impact of psoriasis disease severity and special area involvement on patient-reported outcomes in the real world: an analysis from the CorEvitas psoriasis registry

BACKGROUND

The impact of psoriasis in special areas (i.e., scalp, nails, palms, soles, genitals) on patient physical functioning, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and work abilities has not been fully characterized. We assessed associations between disease severity and special area involvement in psoriasis symptoms, HRQoL, and work/activity impairment.

METHODS

Patients with psoriasis from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry who initiated systemic treatment between 04/2015-06/2020 were included. Outcomes were change from baseline in psoriasis symptoms, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and work/activity impairment at 6 months stratified by baseline disease severity and special area involvement.

RESULTS

Among 2620 patients, increasing disease severity was associated with worsening patient-reported outcomes. Patients with (46.0%; N = 1205) versus without (54.0%; N = 1415) psoriasis in special areas reported greater HRQoL and work/activity impairment. Over 6 months, patients with unchanged or worsening disease severity had reduced HRQoL and increased symptom severity; incremental increases in patient HRQoL and decreases in symptom severity were associated with improved disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher disease severity and special area involvement was associated with worse outcomes and impaired work abilities. These data highlight the significant impact that adequate treatment of severe psoriasis and/or special area involvement may have on patient HRQoL and function.

Impact of residual skin lesions and previous biologic treatment failure on patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic treatment

Recent advances in biologic treatments have made clear skin a realistic treatment goal for psoriasis. However, clear skin may not uniformly translate to an absence of impact on patients' quality of life. This retrospective observational study aimed to elucidate the factors influencing patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis who have demonstrated successful clinician-reported outcomes on using biologics. A total of 96 patients who have achieved a ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores with ≥6 months of biologic treatment were included. Their median PASI score was 0.4, with 37.5% having achieved PASI 100 (clear skin). Furthermore, 47.9% reported no impact of psoriasis on their quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] score 0 or 1), while 52.1% reported a negative impact (DLQI score ≥2). Notably, 28.1% of the participants had a history of biologic treatment failure, defined as the inability to achieve or sustain a 75% PASI improvement with the previously used biologic agent. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a positive association between achieving PASI 100 and reporting no impact of psoriasis on quality of life (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-10.91, P = 0.007). Conversely, prior biologic treatment failure was negatively associated with reporting no impact of psoriasis on quality of life (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.65, P = 0.023). Furthermore, among patients with clear skin, those with experience of previous biologic treatment failure reported significantly lower quality of life than those without such experience (P = 0.033). In conclusion, minimal residual skin lesions and prior biologic treatment failure were associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriasis. Opting for a biologic agent with the highest predicted efficacy, rather than pursuing a "step-up" approach with a higher possibility of treatment failure, may be a more suitable strategy in the biologic treatment of psoriasis.

Real-World Long-Term Effectiveness of Risankizumab Among Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Analysis from an International Medical Chart Review (RAPID) Study

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data on the efficacy of risankizumab (RZB) in clinical moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) are limited. The RAPID study assessed real-world clinical and patient-reported outcomes in RZB-treated PsO patients using data collected from dermatologists in Canada, the Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, and Poland.

METHODS

This ongoing, retrospective chart review collected data from medical records of RZB-treated adults with moderate-to-severe PsO (09/2022-06/2023). Eligible patients received RZB, had ≥ 12 months of medical records after RZB initiation (index date), and had Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), or static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) scores ≥ 3 months before and up to 18 months after the index date. The proportion of patients achieving a clear/almost clear PsO (IGA/sPGA = 0/1), PASI ≤ 1, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) = 0/1, and a 90%/100% improvement from baseline in PASI as well as the mean changes in PASI, DLQI, itch, and skin pain scores at 12 and 18 months were reported for patients with non-missing assessments at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

Most patients (66.4%) were male, 74.0% were biologic naïve, and 73.0% had scalp PsO. Mean baseline IGA/sPGA was 3.7 ± 0.5, with a mean PASI of 23.3 ± 11.8. After 12 months, 86.1% of patients reported IGA/sPGA ≤ 1, and 75.7% achieved PASI90; these further increased to 91.1% and 80.5% at 18 months. DLQI, itch, and skin pain scores improved over time.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrated the durable, real-world effectiveness of RZB in patients with moderate-to-severe PsO through continued improvement in disease and symptom severity over 18 months, with most of the patients reporting clear/almost clear skin.

Long-Term Efficacy, Safety, and Drug Survival of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriasis: Real-World Data from the Czech Republic BIOREP Registry

BACKGROUND

Real-world data on the long-term use of guselkumab for treatment of psoriasis are still limited.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, and drug survival of guselkumab in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study analyzing Czech Republic registry (BIOREP) data of patients treated with guselkumab.

RESULTS

In total, 333 patients were included. Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score was significant. Mean PASI score decreased from 16 at baseline to 0.7, 0.9, and 0.8 after 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Absolute PASI scores of ≤ 3 and ≤ 1 were achieved in 93.9% and 77.9%, 94.2% and 71.0%, and 94.8% and 70.7% of patients after 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Response PASI 90 and PASI 100 were attained in 81.8% and 57.1%, 75.4% and 50.7%, and 75.9% and 55.2% of patients after 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. The percentage of patients achieving PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses was higher throughout the study in bio-naive and in normal-weight patients, while presence of psoriatic arthritis had no influence. Improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score was also significant; mean DLQI score decreased from 14.2 at baseline to 0.9, 1.0, and 0.7 after 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Patients with PASI 100 had lower mean DLQI throughout the study compared with patients with PASI 90. Major reason for discontinuation was loss of effectiveness in 7.1% of patients, while only 0.6% were due to adverse events. Overall cumulative drug survival was high, with only a minimal decline over time, reaching 91.6%, 87.0%, and 85.5% after 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Drug survival was not affected by previous biological treatment, patient weight, or presence of psoriatic arthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study demonstrated the long-term effectiveness, good safety profile, and high drug survival of guselkumab treatment over a period of 36 months.

The impact of complete clearance and almost complete clearance of psoriasis on quality of life: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic skin condition with systemic manifestations that have a detrimental impact on a patient's quality of life, affecting social, psychological, and sexual aspects of life. Complete clearance of lesions is a meaningful end goal of treatment; however, it is often difficult for patients to achieve. In this literature review, we summarized past studies that compared patients who achieved complete clearance to those who were almost clear to highlight the effect of complete clearance on psychological distress, social stigma, self-esteem, and interpersonal relationships in adult patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

A literature search was performed through the PubMed database using the keywords "clearance of psoriasis", "complete clearance of psoriasis", "psychological impact psoriasis", "social impact psoriasis", and "stigma of psoriasis". Age (< 18) and language (only articles written in English were included) were the only exclusion criteria to include adult patients only. The information was then collected and evaluated to compare complete clearance and almost complete clearance of psoriasis.

RESULTS

Of the patients with complete skin clearance (sPGA of 0), 61.4-91.1% reported a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0, indicating no detectable impact of psoriasis on quality of life, compared to 45.7-48.3% who were almost clear. Patients who were completely clear felt psoriasis had less of an effect on their leisure activities and daily living compared to patients who were almost clear. Patient perceptions of disease severity also differed between the two groups, with the majority (65.5%) of those achieving complete clearance reporting a Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI) of 0, which is consistent with their disease being "not at all severe", compared to 32.6% of those who were almost but not completely clear. While patients with complete clearance achieve a DLQI of 0 at a higher rate than those who have only almost complete clearance, the difference in the mean DLQI between patients with sPGA of 0 (completely clear) and sPGA of 1 (almost clear) is less than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID of 3-5) of the DLQI.

Super-Response to Guselkumab Treatment in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Age, Body Weight, Baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and Baseline Investigator's Global Assessment Scores Predict Complete Skin Clearance

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease that often leads to a diminished quality of life. Goals of treating patients with psoriasis have shifted with more focus on achieving near or complete clearance of the skin. Guselkumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23, is effective in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis achieving super-response (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 100 response at Weeks 20 and 28) after commencing guselkumab treatment.

METHODS

Pooled data from VOYAGE-1 and VOYAGE-2 studies identified super-response; baseline demographic, disease, and pharmacokinetic characteristics were compared with non-super-response. A stepwise logistic regression analysis identified which factors were potentially predictive of super-response status, with significance level of 0.1.

RESULTS

A subset of patients randomized to guselkumab comprised this post hoc analysis (n=664); 271 patients achieved super-response vs 393 with non-super-response. Patient age at study entry and baseline body weight (≤90 kg vs >90 kg), PASI, and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score were significant predictors of super-response status, with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.98 (0.967-0.993; p=0.003), 1.42 (1.026-1.977; p=0.034), 0.97 (0.955-0.993; p=0.007), and 0.66 (0.433-0.997; p=0.048), respectively. More patients with super-response achieved an early response: Week 2 PASI 75 (5.5% vs 1.8%) and Week 8 PASI 100 (22.5% vs 3.3%) vs non-super-response. Median serum guselkumab concentrations through Week 28 were slightly greater in patients with super-response vs non-super-response.

CONCLUSION

Guselkumab was more likely to achieve early clinical responses (complete skin clearance) in younger patients, less obese patients, and patients with less severe psoriasis.

Efficacy of Brodalumab and Guselkumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Who are Inadequate Responders to Ustekinumab: A Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Purpose

Both brodalumab and guselkumab improve skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis after inadequate response to ustekinumab. In the absence of a direct head-to-head comparison, the relative efficacy of brodalumab and guselkumab in non-responders to ustekinumab were compared using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).

Patients and Methods

Individual patient data for brodalumab (n = 121) were pooled from the AMAGINE-2 and -3 trials and adjusted using a propensity score reweighting method, so that baseline and week 16 characteristics matched the aggregate published data of patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab who switched to guselkumab (n = 135) in the NAVIGATE trial.

Results

After inadequate response to ustekinumab, brodalumab resulted in significantly higher psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 90 rates versus guselkumab at post-treatment switch week 12 (62.7% vs 48.1%, relative difference 14.6% [95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3–23.9], p = 0.002 [number needed to treat [NNT] = 6.8]) and week 36 (63.7% vs 51.1%; relative difference 12.6% [95% CI 4.1–21.0]; p = 0.004 [NNT = 7.9]) and PASI 100 rate at week 36 (40.3% vs 20.0%; relative difference 20.3% [95% CI 11.8–28.7]; p < 0.001 [NNT = 4.9]).

Conclusion

In this MAIC, brodalumab was associated with greater improvements than guselkumab in inadequate responders to ustekinumab. Switching to brodalumab in such patients may be a more effective strategy than switching to guselkumab.