Use of systemic therapies in adults with atopic dermatitis: 12-month results from the European prospective observational study in patients eligible for systemic therapy for atopic dermatitis (EUROSTAD)

One-Year Insights into the GLOBOSTAD Multinational Prospective Observational Study of Patients Receiving Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Currently, limited data are available on long-term use of dupilumab to treat atopic dermatitis (AD) in a multinational real-world setting. The aim of this analysis was to report the interim 1-year data for patients with AD enrolled in the GLOBOSTAD registry, including treatment patterns, dupilumab effectiveness and safety, and healthcare burden.

METHODS

GLOBOSTAD is an ongoing, 5-year, multinational, prospective, observational study of adult/adolescent (aged ≥ 12 years at baseline) patients with AD who initiated dupilumab in real-world settings according to their local country-specific prescribing guidelines. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months and included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) total score, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) total score, percent body surface area (BSA) affected, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) total score for adults or Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) total score for adolescents and pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) total score.

RESULTS

At the interim 1-year cut-off (March 2023), 955 patients were enrolled in GLOBOSTAD, and follow-up data were obtained from 903 patients. After dupilumab initiation, mean improvements in effectiveness outcome measures from baseline to month 3 were EASI from 25.1 to 6.1, SCORAD 59.3 to 25.3, POEM 19.7 to 8.7, DLQI 13.7 to 5.3, CDLQI 12.2 to 2.7 and pruritus NRS 6.3 to 2.5, with each measure exceeding the minimal clinically important difference. These positive changes in effectiveness outcomes were maintained or further improved through 12 months since treatment initiation. AD-related hospitalizations and emergency room or urgent care facility visits decreased from 11.1% to 1.7% from baseline to month 12.

CONCLUSIONS

In a multinational real-world setting, dupilumab demonstrated rapid, robust and sustained effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severe AD across multiple disease domains, including AD signs, symptoms, quality of life and emergency/urgent care visits. Safety was consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03992417.

A prospective observational cohort study comparing the treatment effectiveness and safety of ciclosporin, dupilumab and methotrexate in adult and paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: results from the UK-Irish A-STAR register

BACKGROUND

The main conventional systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) are methotrexate (MTX) and ciclosporin (CyA). Dupilumab was the first novel systemic agent to enter routine clinical practice. There are no head-to-head randomized controlled trials or real-world studies comparing these agents directly. Network meta-analyses provide indirect comparative efficacy and safety data and have shown strong evidence for dupilumab and CyA.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of CyA, dupilumab and MTX in AD.

METHODS

We compared the effectiveness and safety of these systemic agents in a prospective observational cohort study of adult and paediatric patients recruited into the UK-Irish Atopic eczema Systemic TherApy Register (A-STAR). Treatment effectiveness measures included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and children's DLQI (cDLQI). The minimum duration of treatment was 28 days and follow-up was 12 months. Adjusted Cox-regression analysis was used to compare the hazard ratios of achieving EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 over time, and linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate changes in efficacy scores. Treatment safety was assessed by examining adverse events (AEs) at follow-up visits.

RESULTS

We included 488 patients (311 adults and 177 children/adolescents) on dupilumab (n = 282), MTX (n = 149) or CyA (n = 57). CyA and MTX were primarily used as the first-line treatment, while dupilumab was mainly a second-line systemic treatment as per UK National Institute of Clinical and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations. EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 were achieved more rapidly in the dupilumab and CyA groups compared with MTX. After adjustment for previous severity, the reduction in EASI, POEM, PP-NRS and DLQI was greater for patients treated with dupilumab compared with MTX. In patients with severe disease the reduction in EASI, POEM and PP-NRS was even greater with CyA. The incidence rates of AEs were similar across groups (734, 654 and 594 per 10 000 person-month on CyA, dupilumab and MTX, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world comparison of CyA, dupilumab and MTX in AD suggests that dupilumab is consistently more effective than MTX and that CyA is most effective in very severe disease within 1 year of follow-up.

Nonsteroidal Approaches for Atopic Dermatitis®: A Clinical Update

Topical corticosteroids (TCSs) are the most widely used treatment for atopic Dermatitis® (AD), but they can have adverse effects such as skin atrophy, telangiectasias, and hypopigmentation, especially with prolonged use of higher potency steroids. Many patients also have a fear of using TCSs, known as "corticophobia." With the development of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors, a nonsteroidal approach to the treatment of AD may be possible and may be preferred by certain patients. Given what is known about these nonsteroidal therapies, we propose a structured treatment ladder and action plan that can guide clinicians and patients on the use of these therapies for the treatment of AD. The ladder divides nonsteroidal medication classes into treatments for exacerbation versus maintenance therapies in an escalating order of increasing potential for adverse effects, both real and perceived. This treatment algorithm proposal paves the way for a potential nonsteroidal approach to managing AD.

Italian healthcare resource consumptions and direct costs of adults with atopic dermatitis before and after dupilumab treatment

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease, associated with comorbidities, and high healthcare consumptions and costs. This study assessed the burden before and after treatment with dupilumab in adults with severe AD from 2018 to 2020, from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (SSN).

METHODS

From Fondazione Ricerca e Salute's administrative healthcare database (~5 million inhabitants/year), adults treated with dupilumab from 09/01/2018 to 31/12/2020 (index date) and a five-year lookback were identified. Age, sex and comorbidities at baseline, concomitant drugs, overnight hospitalizations, outpatient specialist services and direct costs charged to the SSN one year before/after index date were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 337 adults treated with dupilumab (5.8x100,000 adult inhabitants/2019; 8.0x100,000/2020; 55% males; mean age 43±19), 68% (228/337) had ≥12-month follow-up available. Asthma was a common comorbidity (23% patients). Rates of patients treated with nearly all concomitant AD-related therapies reduced from 12 months before to 12 months after dupilumab treatment: antibacterials (from 59% to 50%), systemic corticosteroids (55% to 29%), antihistamines (54% to 38%) and cyclosporine (52% to 7%). A similar trend was observed among patients with asthma as comorbidity. Within 12 months before/after dupilumab, patients hospitalized halved from 14% to 7%, and patients receiving outpatient specialist care reduced from 72% to 65%. Annual mean direct total costs per patient treated with dupilumab charged to the SSN, net of dupilumab cost, were €1384 and €773, before and after dupilumab dispensation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Before dupilumab, observed patients had higher healthcare resource consumptions and direct SSN costs than after dupilumab.

Perception and Experience of Dupilumab in Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-Life Study

Purpose

There are few data on the practical use of dupilumab by the patients and on the patients' experience with this treatment.

Objective

The objective of our study was to describe the experience and perception of dupilumab treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Patients and Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study including adult patients with moderate to severe AD treated with dupilumab between January 2017 and December 2021. Clinical characteristics were collected and a questionnaire was sent to all patients. It consisted of different parts including the injection method and different numeric rating scales (NRS) evaluating the patient's satisfaction and the constraints related to the treatment.

Results

Eighty-two patients were included and the information was available for 77 patients who responded to the questionnaire. Injection of dupilumab was performed by a nurse in 47% (n=36) of patients and 43% (n=33) were autonomous. Injections were performed by a family member for 7 patients or by the general practitioner (1 patient). A wearing-off of the beneficial effect of dupilumab was reported by 47% of patients leading to shorten the dosing interval. In contrast, dose spacing was reported by 9 patients (11%). After a mean follow-up time of 29.7 ± 10.7 months (median: 27 months), drug survival was 72%. From the patients' perspective, the mean patient's satisfaction NRS score was 7.5 ± 1.8, and the constraints related to the treatment were scored at 3.1 ± 2.1 on NRS.

Conclusion

Although AD treatments may contribute to the burden of the disease, dupilumab was associated with a lower burden score, likely reflecting both treatment efficacy and easy of use and patient satisfaction.