Biodose Tools: an R shiny application for biological dosimetry

LBDNet inter-laboratory comparison at high doses of ionizing radiation using the dicentric plus caffeine assay

PURPOSE

To assess the performance of the LBDNet laboratories in estimating dose over 5 Gy of ionizing radiation using the dicentric chromosome plus caffeine assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dose-response curve fitting: Peripheral blood was irradiated in vitro between 5 and 25 Gy. Then, the DC plus caffeine assay was carried out. Thirteen laboratories received and analyzed metaphase images. The linear dose-response curve was fitted for each laboratory. Dose estimation was performed analyzing coded metaphase images from three different irradiated samples (7.5, 15, 20 Gy) and using the fitted curve from every laboratory.

RESULTS

The dose estimation accuracy was within the expected dose ranges. The 76.9%, 84.6% and 69.2% of the estimated doses fell into the ± 20% of the true radiation dose. The 92.3%, 92.3%, and 61.5% of the 95% of the confidence interval of the estimated doses included the true radiation dose. The trueness was 0.9%, 4.4% and 9.6%. The Coefficients of Variation of the estimated doses were 14.5%, 16.1% and 17.8%. Results from only one laboratory were deemed questionable for dose estimation, based on the Z-score derived from robust methods.

CONCLUSION

The intercomparison study yielded satisfactory results; however, dose estimation accuracy tended to decrease, and variability between laboratory results increased as the dose level rose.

Synergistic Effects of UVB and Ionizing Radiation on Human Non-Malignant Cells: Implications for Ozone Depletion and Secondary Cosmic Radiation Exposure

The ozone layer in the Earth's atmosphere filters solar radiation and limits the unwanted effects on humans. A depletion of this ozone shield would permit hazardous levels of UV solar radiation, especially in the UVB range, to bombard Earth's surface, resulting in potentially significant effects on human health. The concern for these adverse effects intensifies if we consider that the UVB solar radiation is combined with secondary cosmic radiation (SCR) components, such as protons and muons, as well as terrestrial gamma rays. This research aims to delve into the intricate interplay between cosmic and solar radiation on earth at the cellular level, focusing on their synergistic effects on human cell biology. Through a multidisciplinary approach integrating radiobiology and physics, we aim to explore key aspects of biological responses, including cell viability, DNA damage, stress gene expression, and finally, genomic instability. To assess the impact of the combined exposure, normal i.e., non-malignant human cells (skin fibroblasts, keratinocytes, monocytes, and lymphocytes) were exposed to high-energy protons or gamma rays in combination with UVB. Cellular molecular and cytogenetic biomarkers of radiation exposure, such as DNA damage (γH2AΧ histone protein and dicentric chromosomes), as well as the expression pattern of various stress genes, were analyzed. In parallel, the MTS reduction and lactate dehydrogenase assays were used as indicators of cell viability, proliferation, and cytotoxicity. Results reveal remaining DNA damage for the co-exposed samples compared to samples exposed to only one type of radiation in all types of cells, accompanied by increased genomic instability and distinct stress gene expression patterns detected at 24-48 h post-exposure. Understanding the impact of combined radiation exposures is crucial for assessing the health risks posed to humans if the ozone layer is partially depleted, with structural and functional damages inflicted by combined cosmic and UVB exposure.

Automated system for establishing standard radiation dose-response curves and dose estimation for the Korean population

Biological dosimetry is crucial for estimating the doses from biological samples and guiding medical interventions for accidental radiation exposure. This study aimed to derive rapid and precise dose estimates using a dicentric chromosome assay. To address the challenges of manual scoring of dicentric chromosomes, we upgraded an automatic system aimed at enhancing the precision of dicentric chromosome detection while reducing the need for human intervention. We collected blood from 30 individuals aged 20-67 years to create 30 dose-response curves aiming to investigate the differences in responses among individuals. To validate dose-estimate accuracy within a 95% confidence interval, blinded samples were categorized into three groups according to the radiation dose as follows: ≥2, ≤ 1, and 0.1 Gy. When scoring dicentric chromosomes without human review and constructing a dose-response curve, individual differences were observed. For doses ≤ 1 Gy, the standard root formula was effective; conversely, for doses ≥ 2 Gy, the regression deep neural network proved to be more ac-curate. Our developed program allowed for the rapid analysis of a large volume of dicentric chromosome images.

RENEB interlaboratory comparison for biological dosimetry based on dicentric chromosome analysis and cobalt-60 exposures higher than 2.5 Gy

In previous RENEB interlaboratory comparisons based on the manual scoring of dicentric chromosomes, a tendency for systematic overestimation for doses > 2.5 Gy was found. However, these exercises included only very few doses in the high dose range, and they were heterogeneous in terms of radiation quality and evaluation mode, and comparable only to a limited extent. Here, this presumed deviation was explored by investigating three doses > 2.5 Gy. Blood samples were irradiated (2.56, 3.41 and 4.54 Gy) using a 60Co source and sent to 14 member laboratories of the RENEB network, which performed the dicentric chromosome assay (manual and/or semi-automatic scoring) and reported dose estimates. Most participants provided estimates that agreed very well with the physical reference doses and all provided dose estimates were in the correct clinical category (> 2 Gy). The previously observed tendency for a systematic bias across all laboratories was not confirmed. However, tendencies for systematic underestimation were detected for dose estimations for reference doses given in terms of absorbed dose to blood and for some participants, a laboratory-specific trend of systematic under- or overestimation was observed. The importance of regularly performed quality checks for a broad dose range became obvious to avoid misinterpretation of results.

Influence of statistical methods on lower limits of dose estimation in biological dosimetry

PURPOSE

In cases of radiological or nuclear events, biological dosimetry enables decisions whether an individual was exposed to ionizing radiation and the estimation of the dose. Several statistical methods are used to assess uncertainties. The stringency of the applied method has an impact on the lowest dose that can be detected. To obtain reliable and comparable results, it is crucial to harmonize the applied statistical methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The decision threshold and detection limit of the statistical methods were derived for variable cell numbers. The coverage of the 95% confidence intervals as well as the false-positive and false-negative rates of the methods were compared based on simulations. The evaluated methods included a graphical method, the propagation of errors and a Bayesian method.

RESULTS

The minimum resolvable doses, the doses at the detection limit and the coverage were relatively variable between the compared methods. The Bayesian method showed the best coverage, lowest resolvable doses and had false-positive rates close to 5%. The graphical method with the combination of two 83% confidence intervals also showed promising results. The other methods were either too conservative or underestimated the uncertainties for some doses or cell numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of the lower dose limits is a central part of biological dosimetry and the applied statistical methods have a strong influence on the interpretation of the results. Simulations enable comparisons between methods and provide important information for the harmonization and standardization of the uncertainty assessment.

Networking in biological and physical retrospective dosimetry in Europe and beyond

Ionizing radiation is of huge benefit to society; however, the risks of radiation overexposure in occupational settings or due to accidents or other incidents are of growing concern, not least due to the potential implications for exposed individuals in terms of acute high dose (e.g. ARS) and/or longer term low dose health effects such as cancer or genetic effects. This manuscript considers the state of the art for biological and 'fortuitous' physical retrospective dose estimation either in blood or in materials being carried by suspected exposed individuals, respectively, in support of routine and emergency radiation incident response, and the potential future progress in this fascinating and active field. In recent years, international experts in this field have engaged in active collaboration and networking on support of these goals, and continued efforts in this area will ensure the global community remains ready to respond to radiation accidents and incidents. In addition, over and above improved dose and exposure characterization in the field of radiation emergency medicine, scientific developments in biological markers may contribute to potential contributions to individualized or stratified risk estimation in molecular epidemiology to assess long term, low dose radiation risk; in personalized medical dosimetry for better justification and optimization for use of radiation in such settings, and even perhaps for potential future situations involving radiation exposure, for example protection of individuals traveling to space.

Radiation-induced gastrointestinal and cutaneous injuries: understanding models, pathologies, assessments, and clinically accepted practices

PURPOSE

A U. S. and European joint effort fostering the development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) operable in case of radiological or nuclear emergencies.

METHODS

Based on the joint engagement between the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the French Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), a Statement of Intent to Collaborate was signed in 2014 and a series of working group meeting were established. In December 2022, the NIAID and IRSN hosted a five-day, U.S./European meeting titled 'Radiation-Induced Cutaneous and Gastrointestinal Injuries: Advances in Understanding Pathologies, Assessment, and Clinically Accepted Practices' in Paris, France. The goals of the meeting were to bring together U.S. and European investigators to explore new research avenues for the medical management of skin and gastrointestinal injuries, including specific diagnostics for each organ system, animal models, and promising medical countermeasures (MCMs) to mitigate radiation damage. There was also an emphasis on exploring additional areas of medicine and response to understand best practices from other emergency scenarios, which could be leveraged to improve radiation preparedness, and the importance of accurate dosimetry in preclinical work.

RESULTS

Subsequent to the workshop, seven collaborative projects, funded by both organizations, were established on topics ranging from MCMs and predictive biomarkers, and using physical methods to assess cutaneous radiation injuries, to mechanistic studies to understand radiation-induced damage in multiple organ systems. The importance of accurate dosimetry in preclinical works was highlighted and two recently published U.S./European commentaries that focus on the need for dosimetry standardization in the reported literature had their origins in this meeting. This commentary summarizes the workshop and open discussions among academic investigators, industry researchers, and U.S. and IRSN program representatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the substantive progress made due to these interactions, both groups plan to expand out these meetings by incorporating high-level investigators from across the globe, while endeavoring to maintain the informal setting that was conducive to in-depth scientific discussion and enhanced the state of the science in radiation research.

Effect of changing the radiation dose range on the in vitro cytogenetic dose response to gamma-rays

PURPOSE

To examine the distortion of the linear quadratic (LQ) model of in vitro cytogenetic dose response over an extended range of γ-ray doses by analyzing the available literature data, and to establish the dose ranges, in which the LQ dose response curve (DRC) can be most accurately fitted for biological dosimetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on yields of dicentrics (Dic) or dicentrics plus centric rings (Dic + CR) induced in vitro in human lymphocytes by acute γ-rays were extracted from 108 open sources. The overall dose response dataset in the dose range up to 50 Gy was fitted to a fractional-rational (FR) model, which included a 'basic' LQ function in the numerator, and a reduction factor dependent on the square of the dose in the denominator. Cytogenetic dose response data obtained at Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology, Kharkiv, Ukraine (GIMRO) in the range 0.1 - 20.3 Gy acute γ-rays were fitted to the LQ model with the progressive changing minimum or maximum radiation dose.

RESULTS

The overall dose response, as expected, followed the LQ function in the dose range ≤5 Gy, but in the extended dose range appeared to be S-shaped, with intensive saturation and a plateau at doses ≥22 Gy. Coefficients of the 'basic' LQ equation in FR model were very close to many published DRCs; calculated asymptote was 17. Fitting of the GIMRO dataset to the LQ model with the shift of the dose range showed the increase in linear coefficient with the increment of either minimum or maximum radiation dose, while the decline of the quadratic coefficient was regulated mostly by the increase of the highest dose. The best goodness of fit, assessed by lower χ2 values, occurred for dose ranges 0.1 - 1.0 Gy; 0.5 - 5.9 Gy; 1.0 - 7.8 Gy; 2.0 - 9.6 Gy, 3.9 - 16.4 Gy and 5.9 - 20.3 Gy. The 'see-saw' effect in changes of LQ coefficients was confirmed by re-fitting datasets published by other laboratories.

CONCLUSIONS

The classical LQ model with fixed coefficients appears to have limited applicability for cytogenetic dosimetry at radiation doses >5 Gy due to the saturation of the dose response. Different response of the LQ coefficients to the changes of the dose range must be considered during the DRC construction. Proper selection of minimum and maximum dose in calibration experiments makes it possible to improve the goodness of fit of the LQ DRC.

Baseline micronucleus frequencies and 60Co cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay dose-response curve for biodosimetry in Vietnam

This study aims to establish baseline micronucleus (MN) frequencies from various populations of residents in Vietnam and develop a 60Co dose-response curve for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay. Blood samples were exposed in vitro to a 60Co source at a dose rate of 275 mGy per min in a range of 0.1 to 4.0 Gy. MN background frequencies were 4.5 ± 3.2, 7.3 ± 4.6, 7.0 ± 3.8 and 13.1 ± 6.7 in 1000 binucleated (BN) cells for 96 healthy donors, 22 male radiation workers and 12 breast cancer patients, respectively. Blood samples from three healthy donors were used to generate the MN dose-response curve: y = C + (0.0496 ± 0.0069)D + (0.0143 ± 0.0026)D2. This curve was verified through an inter-laboratory comparison (RENEB ILC 2021). Our findings highlight the significance of the CBMN assay as an additional essential tool for biodosimetry in Vietnam.