Great expectations: views and perceptions of professionalism amongst mental health services staff, patients and carers

Supporting unpaid carers around hospital leave for people detained under the Mental Health Act (1983) in England: carer and practitioner perspectives

BACKGROUND

When an individual is detained in hospital it is important that they maintain contact with their family, friends and communities as these can be helpful for their well-being and recovery. Maintaining these relationships is also important to unpaid carers (family or friends), but they can be strained by carers' instigation of, or compliance with, the involuntary detention. Section 17 of the Mental Health Act (1983) in England and Wales allows for temporary leave from hospital, from an hour in the hospital grounds to going home for a few days. However, carers are not always involved in decisions around statutory s.17 leave, even where they are expected to support someone at home. This study aimed to explore how practice can be improved to better involve and support carers around s.17 leave.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were held with 14 unpaid carers and 19 mental health practitioners, including four Responsible Clinicians, in three sites in England in 2021. The research explored views on what works well for carers around s.17 leave, what could be improved and the barriers to such improvements. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified in the analysis: the need for carer support and the challenges surrounding provision; challenges with communication, planning and feedback around s.17 leave; and inconsistency in involving carers around s.17 leave. Permeating all themes was a lack of resources presenting as under-staffing, high demands on existing staff, and lack of time and capacity to work and communicate with carers.

CONCLUSION

Implications include the need for more funding for mental health services for both prevention and treatment; staff training to increase confidence with carers; and standardised guidance for practitioners on working with carers around s.17 leave to help ensure consistency in practice. The study concluded with the production of a 'S.17 Standard', a guidance document based on the research findings consisting of 10 steps for practitioners to follow to support the greater involvement and support of carers.

Assessing professionalism in mental health clinicians: development and validation of a situational judgement test

BACKGROUND

Situational judgement test (SJT) scores have been observed to predict actual workplace performance. They are commonly used to assess non-academic attributes as part of selection into many healthcare roles. However, no validated SJT yet exists for recruiting into mental health services.

AIMS

To develop and validate an SJT that can evaluate procedural knowledge of professionalism in applicants to clinical roles in mental health services.

METHOD

SJT item content was generated through interviews and focus groups with 56 professionals, patients and carers related to a large National Health Service mental health trust in England. These subject matter experts informed the content of the final items for the SJT. The SJT was completed by 73 registered nurses and 36 allied health professionals (AHPs). The primary outcome measure was supervisor ratings of professionalism and effectiveness on a relative percentile rating scale and was present for 69 of the participating nurses and AHPs. Personality assessment scores were reported as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

SJT scores statistically significantly predicted ratings of professionalism (β = 0.31, P = 0.01) and effectiveness (β = 0.32, P = 0.01). The scores demonstrated statistically significant incremental predictive validity over the personality assessment scores for predicting supervisor ratings of professionalism (β = 0.26, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that a carefully designed SJT can validly assess important personal attributes in clinicians working in mental health services. Such assessments are likely to represent evidence based, cost-effective tools that can support values-based recruitment to mental health service roles.

Humor in rehabilitation professions: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Studying humor in the rehabilitation professions is important given its positive effects on health and well-being. We conducted a scoping review to understand how the use of humor has been explored in the existing literature in four rehabilitation professions. The rehabilitation professions included audiology, speech-language pathology, physical therapy, and occupational therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The five-stage method identified by Arksey and O'Malley was used to conduct this review. Six databases were searched. We included 57 articles in our final review, summarized in a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We generated seven themes in our analysis: (1) humour as a management strategy in therapy; (2) humour as a power establisher vs. equalizer; (3) humour as a coping mechanism in rehabilitation; (4) conceptualizations of non-verbal humor cues in therapy; (5) Is humour trainable? (6) Humor used to foster group cohesion; and (7) Attitudes and beliefs surrounding humor practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings emphasize the importance of using humor in the rehabilitation professions, and the ways in which humor is conceptualized in a multitude of ways for both clinician and client. Future work is needed to further understand the presence and use of humor in rehabilitation professions.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIn a scoping review of the literature, this study showed that humor was used mainly positively in rehabilitation by the included professions of audiology, speech-language pathology, physical therapy, and occupational therapy and contributed to a sense of belonging.Humor may be an effective way to improve management of client/clinician relations as well as improving group cohesion in rehabilitation settings.In the rehabilitation professions of audiology, speech-language pathology, physical therapy, and occupational therapy, non-verbal humor cues were used in instances where communication was difficult or impaired for clients.

Interventions that support unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients often lack support for their well-being and feel excluded from decisions about patient care.

AIMS

This scoping review aimed to: synthesise the peer-reviewed literature evaluating the outcomes of brief interventions for unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients, identify transferable lessons for evidenced-informed practice, and establish future research priorities.

METHODS

PRISMA scoping review guidelines were followed to search 12 databases using predefined search terms. Two reviewers independently screened papers and applied exclusion/inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact or outcomes of interventions. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Data were synthesised to categorise types of interventions and evidence for their outcomes.

RESULTS

16 papers met the inclusion criteria, and five types of interventions were identified: those that aimed to (1) increase carer involvement in inpatient care; (2) facilitate organisational change to increase carer support and involvement; (3) provide carers with support; (4) deliver psychoeducation and offer support; and (5) reduce carer stress and improve coping skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst evidence of intervention effectiveness was promising, the quality of studies was generally weak. More research is needed to develop an evidence-informed approach to supporting carers during inpatient stays.